the - parental decision - fallacy - israel 2014
Post on 21-Jul-2016
3 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Intactivists THINK before you SPEAK.
A "parental right of decision on MGM" DOES NOT EXIST.
Now you all think "everything is alright" because some "judges" say "it´s up to the parents to
""decide"" whether or not they "wish" to MUTILATE THE CHILD" ___ ...so now you think "everything
is alright" ___ and because you do not think deeper ... also because you do not want to listen to what
I am telling you since oh so long ... you speak as if "now all is well".
But I tell you again that NOTHING IS ALRIGHT.
Fact is: This "court ruling" is a FALLACY, it MISLEADS you all to think "oh, now everything is alright,
because now it is clear that it´s up to the parents to "make their informed decision" ___ ...and you
too believe this FALLACY of a "parental right to make a decision whether or not to inflict preventable
injury on a child" ___
And I tell you again - as so many times in the past - THE TRUTH IS:
NO PARENT has the legal right to inflict or to have inflicted any form of preventable injury on a
child ... because a) infliction of non-accidental injury or any other harm to a child IS ABSOLUTELY
SUBHUMAN!!! (every healthy common sense parent has no problem to agree with me on that one ...
NO healthy common sense parent would ever intentionally inflict preventable injury or any other
harm to the child!!! ___ and b) just as I tell you over and over again in the past years --- >any act of
infliction of non-accidental injury on a child of any age and gender< constitutes the >act of CHILD
ABUSE< under >Federal CAPTA Child Protection Law< and thus is ABSOLUTELY OUTLAWED in every
democratic jurisdiction ... thus also in the USA and ISRAEL!!!
It is HIGH TIME that ALL INTACTIVIST and of course ALL PARENTS finally understand this inarguable
fact, that >a parental right of "make your decision (whether informed of uninformed decision)
DOES NOT EXIST!!!
I tell you again: There are certain LIMITS to what parents are allowed to do ... and one of these
LIMITS is: >Parents DO NOT have the right to inflict preventable injury on a child ... and parents do
also NOT have a right to ""decide"" whether to have the child mutilated or not!!
Again: Such a legal right DOES NOT EXIST!!!
Brit Mila and any other form of Forced Circumcision is already OUTLAWED!
...and it is high time that also intactivists STOP circulating this FALSE and MISLEADING information
"please parents make your informed decision" ___ It is absolutely WRONG to imply that parents
were to have such a right.
Intactivists THINK before you SPEAK and ONLY give CORRECT INFORMATION!
So, while this Supreme Court ""Decision"" looks nice, so as if this were a "decision" for the "benefit of
the child" ... for the "protection of the child" ___ it only "seems to be good" - as this is the hideous
nature of every FALLACY, namely "to appear to be good" ___ BUT only mere "surface thinker" fall
prey to FALLACIES ___ the TRUTH is, that this "court decision" implies that "parents have the right to
decide" ___ which of course is unconstitutional, and DOES NOT constitute any protection of the
CHILD ... DOES NOT PROTECT the CHILD´s RIGHT of PHYSICAL INTEGRITY ... because this "court ruling"
ONLY and fallaciously PROTECTS a "parental right" ... a right that under existing law DOES NOT EXIST!
Conclusion:
What this all in all unconstitutional and hideous, fallacious "court ruling" means, is:
"The CHILDREN are still at the "mercy of their parents", because it wrongly suggests, that "parents
were to have a legal right to "decide" whether or not to mutilate the child ... and that MGM were not
outlawed thus legal ... even if the parents "decide" to mutilate the child or to have it genitally
mutilated."
I know, most of you consider this a "milestone court ruling for the protection of a parental right to
decide" ... BUT by "liking this obviously ludicrous and all in all ANTI-CHILD decision" ... you completely
DISREGARD THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE CHILD ... because this "decision" in its subhuman
nature DISREGARDS THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF THE CHILD of PHYSICAL INTEGRITY and the
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF EQUAL PROTECTION!
Learn in www.intacthumanity.org ... and endorse the Universal Declaration of Demand for Law
Enforcement and its ABC Solution. Amen
Amen Ronald Oberhollenzer - Paternoster
School of Humanity
school.for.humanity@gmail.com
Intact Humanity.org
Global Symposium for an Intact humanity
intact.humanity@gmail.com
www.intacthumanity.org
top related