to poster 2012 vrubino photoel€¦ · to_poster_2012_vrubino_photoel.pptx author: vito rubino...

Laboratory(earthquakes:(Measuring(surface(displacements(with(high;speed(DIC(Vito%Rubino,%Nadia%Lapusta,%Ares%Rosakis%

California(Ins?tute(of(Technology(

The(full;field(displacement(clearly(shows(rela?ve(mo?on(on(the(two(sides(of(the(fault.(In(order(to(compute(strains,(we(denoise(the(displacement(field(using(the(tool(available( in(COSI;Corr,(based(on(Buades(et(al((2008).((

Research(goals(• ((Inves?gate(the(feasibility(of(dynamic(full;field(earthquake(measurements(from(space(through(laboratory(studies.(• ((First,(employ(digital(image(correla?on(techniques((such(as(VIC;2D(and(COSI;Corr)(to(study(the(final(sta?c(deforma?on(of(a(dynamic(crack(with(‘before’(and(‘aRer’(event(images(of(specimens(undergoing(dynamic(fric?onal(sliding.(• (Next,(extend(digital(image(correla?on(to(high(speed(photography(to(capture(dynamic(rupture(propaga?on.((

Specimen(configura?ons(

Sta?c(Measurements(San%Andreas%strike6slip%Fault,%Carrizo%Plain%(h>p://tharsisgallery.com/san6andres6fault6pictures)%

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500 −10

−8

−6

−4

−2

0

2

x 10−4

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500 −6

−5

−4

−3

−2

−1

0

1

2x 10−4

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500−2

−1

0

1

2

3

4

5x 10−4

Conclusions(and(Future(Work(• ((Successfully(characterized(full;field(sta?c(displacements(and(strain(of(a(dynamic(crack(with(digital(image(correla?on(techniques((COSI;Corr(and(VOC;2D).((• ((Performed(dynamic(measurements(by(coupling(high(speed(photography(and(digital(image(correla?on.((• ((Designing(experiments(to(study(poten?al(transi?on(to(supershear(speeds(due(to((favorable(heterogeneity.(

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500 −5

−4

−3

−2

−1

0

1

2

3

4

5x 10−4

• (((Study(discussed(in(this(poster:(interface(is(either(uniform(or(par?ally(glued(in(order(to(confine(the(rupture(before(it(reaches(the(ends(of(the(specimen.(• (((Ongoing(work:(interface(contains(a(patch(of(heterogeneity(with(lower(strength,(higher(stress,(or(pre;exis?ng(subcri?cal(crack.(The(aim(is(to(study(dynamic(triggering(of(a(secondary(rupture(on(a(patch(of(heterogeneity(and(explore(poten?al(transi?on(to(supershear(speeds((Liu(and(Lapusta,(2008).(

Displacement(field(u% Displacement(u(vs.(s% Strain(field(εxx%

Fault(parallel(displacement((((µm)( Fault(normal(displacement((((µm)(

εxx εyy εxy

Fault parallel displacement

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500−40

−35

−30

−25

−20

−15

−10

−5

0

ARer(Filtering(

Before(Filtering(

Fault normal displacement

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

From(real(earthquakes(to(

Earthquakes(are(mimicked( in( the( laboratory(by( the(dynamic( rupture(propaga?ng(along(an(inclined(fric?onal(interface(formed(by(two(Homalite(quadrilateral(plates(under(compression((Xia( et( al.,( 2004).( The( sta?c( compressive( stress(P,( applied( to( the( test( specimen( assembly,(provides( resolved( shear( and( normal( stresses( on( the( fault,( simula?ng( tectonic( stresses(applied(to(a(strike;slip(fric?onal(fault(within(the(Earth’s(crust.(Dynamic(rupture( is(triggered(through(the(electrical(discharge(provided(by(a(NiCr(wire(filament.(((

Digital( (Image(Correla?on((DIC)(is(an(op?cal(method(to(measure(the(deforma?on(on(a(specimen(surface.(DIC(technique(iden?fies(gray(level(pa]erns(in(small(pixel(subsets(and(tracks(their(mo?on(during(deforma?on.(Two(methods(are(used(in(this(study:(VIC;2D((Correlated(Solu?ons(Inc.)(and(COSI;Corr((Leprince(et.(al,(2007).(Results(are(presented(for(COSI;Corr.((

Before(dynamic(rupture% ARer(dynamic(rupture%

50 100 150 200 250

−0.4

−0.35

−0.3

−0.25

−0.2

−0.15

−0.1

Location

Dat

a va

lue

unfilteredfiltered

•  Interface length (shown in frame): ~40 mm •  Rupture goes through interface in t < 20 µs •  Computed rupture speed: vr ~ 2.5 mm/µs •  Compare to Homalite wave speeds: - cs = 1.29 mm/µs - cp = 2.61 mm/µs •  Mach cone angle is given by: sin θ = cs / vr , θ ~ 30° •  Mach cone will advance ~ 12.5 mm

Subset: 21 pixels Step: 1 pixels

Digital(Image(Correla?on((DIC)( Dynamic(Measurements(

laboratory(earthquakes(

All(quotes(are(in(mm(

x2’

x1

x2

u1# u2#

Large:(characteris?c(pa]ern(Small:(high(resolu?on(

• ((Subset(size:(32x32%• %%Step:(4(1 pixel ∼ 83 µm

42.6 mm

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500 −0.5

−0.45

−0.4

−0.35

−0.3

−0.25

−0.2

−0.15

−0.1

−0.05

0

s(

x1’

u1'#

Fault(Heterogenei?es(We(are(currently(inves?ga?ng(supershear(transi?on(by(dynamic(triggering(of(a(secondary(rupture(on(a(patch(of(heterogeneity,(such(as(a(preexis?ng(subcri?cal(crack(or(a(patch(of(higher(prestress,(to(extend(and(experimentally(validate(the(study(of(Liu(and(Lapusta,2008.((((

t = 29 µs

t = 37 µs

t = 41 µs

t = 50 µs

t = 30 µs

t = 35 µs

t = 40 µs

t = 45 µs

High-speed photoeleastic images from Mello et al, 2010.