visceral adipose tissue volume measurement using …...border semi-a presen morph we pe fat, a...
Post on 23-Apr-2020
3 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Visce
Cri
1Facude C
Pontif
OBJE[1]. Arisk tobetweparticuVAT afindinusing CircumRadiatrelatiorelatioMETHrange:anthrohistorybiocheBMI, (TF), AdditiMRI sincludshot tuout-ofimagesequenand SAbordersemi-apresenmorphWe pefat, AcorrelaRESUshowefeature(range2390cWe foCompARFI of adv0.94 bbetweDISCUindepepopulaVAT +Clinicsuperiliver samounCONCused tvolumREFE2011,
eral adipose ti
stóbal Martín Serr
lty of Medicine, PoChile, Santiago, Regificia Universidad
Metr
ECTIVE: ViscerAdditionally, it ha
o develop NALen different biomular, we studied and liver stiffnegs; measuremenMRI; anthrop
mference (WC)tion Force Impu
on between anthon between the aHODS: 19 pati: 61.5-97) with opometry, ARFIy, physical exaemical workup, WC, body fat bicipital fold
ionally, 10 TrE mscans were perfoding the followiurbo spin-echo, f-phase, T1 grade sequences. Wence, centered atAT volumes. Thr until below theautomatic softwnce of hepatichological criteriaerformed differeARFI and anthation statistic.
ULTS: Clinicaled that no subjes of liver cirrhe = 22.6-29), ancc ± 801cc, (rangound a poor correparing measurem
was 0.10 (p=0.6vanced liver fibrobetween (VAT+en (VAT+SAT) USSION: We cendent of the boation. However,+ SAT.
cal diagnosis indior to 1.6m/s thastiffness. This fint of VAT to conCLUSION. Becto study the clin
mes, since it has bERENCES. 1. v
5. Schwenzer et
issue volume m
rano García1,2, Fran
ontificia Universidgión MetropolitanCatólica de Chile,
ropolitana, Chile, 6
ral Adipose Tissas been reported
LFD [2]. In thismarkers and livethe association
ess. For this purpnts of VAT andometric indexe) and Transienulse) for measurihropometric ind
amount of VAT aents (mean ageDM2 were enroI, and MRI. C
am and laboratoHbA1c). Anthropercentage (BF(BF), supraili
measurements wormed on a Philing sequences: T2 with fat satudient echo, ande also included t fat, to assess he FOV includee kidneys. VAT
ware (Image J [3c disease waa over the MRI sent comparisonshropometry usin
l diagnosis anject had clinicahosis. The BM
nd the WC was ge = 1173-2252) elation comparin
ments of adipose 66) and betweenosis [4]), we fouSAT) with ARFand ARFI (p=0
confirmed previdy phenotype. M in those patient
dicated that noneat are at a greateinding suggests nfirm whether thcause of the impnical condition obeen demonstrat
van der Poorten et al Invest Radio
measurement
ncisco Barrera3, HPrieto2,6,
dad Católica de Chna, Chile, 3Gastroe, Santiago, Región6Electrical Engine
sue (VAT) has bd that type 2 diab work, we proper fibrosis/cirrhoof liver fibrosis/pose, we performd Subcutaneous es, like Body nt Elastographying liver stiffnesdexes and MRIand the stiffness : 62 years, rangolled. All patienClinical evaluatory data (hemoopometric data
F%), brachial ciriac fold (SpF)
were made in the llips Intera 1.5Thalf-Fourier sin
uration, in-phased diffusion weiga spectral excitaquantitatively V
ed the diaphragmwas measured u3]) (Figure 1). s evaluated u
scans. between abdomng the Pearson
nd MRI findinal or biochemicI was 29.3 ± 499.7cm ± 9.1 (rand SAT was 3
ng anthropometrtissue with ARF
n (VAT+SAT) wund that the correFI (p=0.001) (Fi.29). ous results [5],
Moreover, we didts with greater l
e of the DM2 paer risk of developerforming furt
here is a progresplications of devf the liver. For tted that anthropoet al Hepatology
ol 2010.
using MRI, andiab
Hugo Vidal4, CarloPablo Irarrázaval2
hile, Santiago, Regenterology, Pontifin Metropolitana, Ceering, Pontificia U
been associated wbetic patients (Dpose to evaluateosis in type 2 dia/cirrhosis with bmed a study that
Adipose TissueMass Index (B
y (TrE) using ss. Furthermore, measurement of the liver.
ge: 55-75, meannts underwent cltion included cglobin, platelet assessed includercumference (B) and subscapuright lobe of the
T MR ngle-e and ghted ation VAT matic using
The using
minal n’s
ngs cal 4.7 range =85-120).143cc ± 1298ccric indexes with FI we found that
with ARFI was 0.elation was 0.63igure 2, right). I
indicating that d not find a relatliver stiffness w
atients had diagnoping liver fibrosher studies of lision of liver fibrveloping hepaticthis, MR imagesometric measurey 2008, 2. Luxm
Figure 2. adipose tiadipose ti
nd its relationbetic patients.
s Riquelme4, Pilar,6, Cristián Tejos2,6
gión Metropolitanficia Universidad CChile, 5Nutrition &Universidad Catól
with liver fibrosi
DM2) are at highe the relationshabetic patients. Ioth the amount ot included clinice (SAT) volumeBMI) and WaiARFI (Acoust
we evaluated thof VAT and th
n weight: 77.2klinical evaluatiocomplete medic
count, compleed weight, heighC), tricipital foular fold (SbFe liver.
. The TrE was . measurements o: the correlation .08 (p=0.72). By
3 between VAT aIn the group wi
BMI and WC ation between thee found a good
nosis of liver fibsis or cirrhosis. iver fibrosis (e.grosis and begin Nc disorders due s do not only plments are bad pr
mi et al. JLUMH
(left) Dispersion gssue volume. (righssue volume. In bl
n with liver ela
r Labbé3, Jessica L6, and Sergio Urib
na, Chile, 2BiomedCatólica de Chile,
& Diabetes, Pontifilica de Chile, Sant
is on patients wiher hip In of
cal es ist tic he he
kg, on, cal ete ht,
old F).
1.65 ± 0.8 m/s,
of VAT (Figurebetween ARFI
y analyzing the gand ARFI (p=0.ith ARFI inferio
are bad predictoe stiffness of thecorrelation betw
brosis/cirrhosis. WOn this group, h
g. liver biopsy) oNASH medical tto metabolic dis
lay a role in liveredictors of this
HS 2008 3. http://
Figure 1. adipose tis
graph showing theht) Dispersion graplue squares data w
astography an
Liberona5, Marco Abe2,4 dical Imaging Cent
Santiago, Región icia Universidad Ctiago, Región Metr
ith Non-alcoholi
(range 0.8-3.4
e 2, left) (r=0.13 and VAT was -0group with ARF12), 0.66 betwee
or to 1.6 m/s the
ors of VAT volue liver and the adween ARFI valu
We identified a higher VAT volon those patienttherapy. seases, different
er fibrosis diagnfat depot.
//rsbweb.nih.gov
MRI image (a), assue (c), and subcu
e relation between ph showing the rel
with direct correlati
nd anthropom
Arrese3, Francisco
ter, Pontificia UniMetropolitana, Ch
Católica de Chile, ropolitana, Chile
ic Fatty Liver D
m/s). The amou
for BMI), and (0.01 (p=0.94), be
FI superior to 1.6en SAT and ARe largest correlat
ume in type 2 ddipose tissue depues and the amo
subgroup of patlume was associts with largest A
t imaging biomaosis, but can als
v/ij/ 4. Nguyen e
and binary image (utaneous adipose ti
waist circumferenlation between ARion.
etry, in type 2
Cruz4, Claudia
versidad Católica hile, 4Radiology, Santiago, Región
isease (NAFLD)
unt of VAT was
(r=0.56 for WC)etween SAT and
6 m/s (suggestiveRFI (p=0.10), and
tion was r=0.33
diabetic patientspots in the entire
ount of VAT and
tients with ARFIiated with higherARFI and larges
arkers should beso measure VAT
et al Hepatology
(b) visceral issue
nce and visceral RFI and visceral
2
)
s
. d e d ,
, e d
I r t
e T
y
4097Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 20 (2012)
top related