writing, editing and grammar tips for lawyers

The 7 All-Time Questions

about Grammar You Always Wanted Someone Else to Ask

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion:

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay”

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie”

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay the brief on the desk.

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay down in the hammock.

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay the brief on the desk.

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay the brief on the desk. Right now.

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay down in the hammock.

7 Lay/Lie

the confusion: “lay” is the present tense of “to lay” but the past tense of “to lie” and the two are not interchangeable

I lay down in the hammock. Yesterday.

7 Lay/Lie

present tense

7 Lay/Lie

present tense I __ down and ___ my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

present tense I lie down and ___ my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

present tense I lie down and lay my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

past tense

7 Lay/Lie

past tense I ___ down and ____ my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

past tense I lay down and ____ my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

past tense I lay down and laid my head on the pillow.

7 Lay/Lie

remember:

7 Lay/Lie

remember: to lay - requires an object

7 Lay/Lie

remember: to lay - requires an object to lie - never has an object

7 Lay/Lie

remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object

7 Lay/Lie

remember: to lay - requires an object - past tense is laid to lie - never has an object - past tense is lay

7 Lay/Lie

6

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.”

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which myself and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which I and the General Manager explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.

6 Me/Myself

Never use “myself” in place of “I.” My letter to Mr. Gallagher was written after our meeting earlier this year during which the General Manager and I explained at length why the District should serve as lead agency.

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.”

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on myself and Paul.

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.

6 Me/Myself

Use “myself” only as an object and only if “I” is acting on “myself.” I have enclosed information related to the relevant areas of practice, as well as profiles on Paul and myself.

6 Me/Myself

5

5 Can/May

can

5 Can/May

can - capability

5 Can/May

can - capability

He can fix a leak with a paper clip.

5 Can/May

can - capability

He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may

5 Can/May

can - capability

He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission

5 Can/May

can - capability

He can fix a leak with a paper clip. may - permission

You may not come in here.

5 Can/May

School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.

5 Can/May

School Can Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California can deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.

5 Can/May

School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.

5 Can/May

School May Deny Funding to Group A public law school in California may deny recognition to a Christian student group that refused to accept gay members, the Supreme Court ruled.

5 Can/May

4

4 Fewer/Less

fewer

4 Fewer/Less

fewer – numbers

4 Fewer/Less

fewer – numbers – can be separated

4 Fewer/Less

fewer – numbers – can be separated less

4 Fewer/Less

fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement

4 Fewer/Less

fewer – numbers – can be separated less – measurement – cannot be separated

4 Fewer/Less

4 Fewer/Less

fewer trees

4 Fewer/Less

fewer trees - less shade

4 Fewer/Less

fewer trees - less shade

fewer drops

4 Fewer/Less

fewer trees - less shade

fewer drops - less water

4 Fewer/Less

Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid:

4 Fewer/Less

Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.

4 Fewer/Less

Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means less trips to the gas station.

4 Fewer/Less

Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.

4 Fewer/Less

Ad for new Ford Escape Hybrid: That means fewer trips to the gas station.

4 Fewer/Less

3

3 Who/Whom

who

3 Who/Whom

who – subject

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Who did you wish to see?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Who did you wish to see?

Whom shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Who Did you wish to see she?

Whom shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Who Did you wish to see her?

Whom shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Whom shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Whom shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Whom Shall I say her is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Whom Shall I say she is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Who shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

Whom did you wish to see?

Who shall I say is calling?

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to _____ is in charge.

That depends on _____ you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to Him is in charge.

That depends on _____ you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to He is in charge.

That depends on _____ you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on _____ you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on _____ you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on Do you want he to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on Do you want him to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on whom you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

who – subject whom – object

I am writing this to whoever is in charge.

That depends on whom you want to go.

3 Who/Whom

2

2 Possessives

singular

2 Possessives

singular

add ’s

2 Possessives

singular

add ’s

the plaintiff’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural

add ’s

the plaintiff’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural

add ’s add ’

the plaintiff’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural

add ’s add ’

the plaintiff’s brief the plaintiffs’ brief

2 Possessives

singular

2 Possessives

singular (ending in s)

2 Possessives

singular (ending in s)

add ’s

2 Possessives

singular (ending in s)

add ’s

Andrews’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural (ending in s)

add ’s

Andrews’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)

add ’s

Andrews’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)

add ’s add ’s

Andrews’s brief

2 Possessives

singular plural (ending in s) (not ending in s)

add ’s add ’s

Andrews’s brief the people’s rights

2 Possessives

one BIG exception:

2 Possessives

one BIG exception:

its

2 Possessives

one BIG exception:

its (possessive pronoun)

2 Possessives

one BIG exception:

its (possessive pronoun)

it’s

2 Possessives

one BIG exception:

its (possessive pronoun)

it’s

(contraction for “it is”)

2 Possessives

1

1 That/Which

that

1 That/Which

that – restrictive

1 That/Which

that – restrictive which

1 That/Which

that – restrictive which – nonrestrictive

1 That/Which

that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive

1 That/Which

that – restrictive – essential which – nonrestrictive – nonessential

1 That/Which

that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential

1 That/Which

that – restrictive – essential – distinguishes which – nonrestrictive – nonessential – merely

adds information

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about?

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank that sits at Fifth and Pine does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? More than one. Which one are we talking about? The one at Fifth and Pine. The clause restricts us to that bank. This is essential information.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks?

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it?

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine.

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks;

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information,

1 That/Which

The Commerce Bank, which sits at Fifth and Pine, does not charge its customers to use the ATM. How many banks? Only one. Where is it? At Fifth and Pine. The clause does not distinguish this Commerce Bank from other Commerce Banks; it merely adds information, non-essential information.

1 That/Which

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that in

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that in of

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that in of .

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that in of .

as

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

it

that in of .

as or

7 Signs for Spotting Useless Words

It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

It should be noted that the Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

The Appendix does not include the transcripts from the depositions.

The Appendix does not include the transcripts.

The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:

The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:

The relevant provisions in Section 604 state in pertinent part:

The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:

The relevant provisions in Section 604 state:

The provisions in Section 604 state:

The provisions in Section 604 state:

The provisions in Section 604 state:

The provisions state:

The provisions in Section 604 state:

The provisions in Section 604 state:

Section 604 provides:

Section 604 provides:

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .

The purpose of this memorandum is to provide you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part of the memorandum provides . . . .

This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum provides you with an overview of the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes the legal aspects of trading in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes trade law in Germany. The first part provides . . . .

This memorandum summarizes German trade law. The first part provides . . . .

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed between the parties as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree:

At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.

At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.

At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.

At the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.

At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.

At or about the same time, Paulson termi-nated his agreement with Vitrex.

About the same time, Paulson terminated his agreement with Vitrex.

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

been

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

been be

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

been be

being

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

been be

being of

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

to be verbs am is

was were are

been be

being of

ion

3 Signs for Spotting Nominalizations

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we are in agreement on the proper tax allocations.

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.

I wanted to confirm this treatment with you, so we agree on the proper tax allocations.

French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not provide a definition of the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”

French law regarding patents does not define the term “inventor.”

French law does not define “inventor.”

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky was in violation of state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.

By applying for the permit, Arnofsky violated state licensing laws.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided in con-nection with our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in the state of India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the terms of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard form of Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accord-ingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of the treatment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

This memorandum is being provided . . . our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight’s (the “Company”) proposed outsourcing of certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum provides a comparative analysis of the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, please find an assessment of such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”), proposes to outsource certain diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor based in India. Specifically, this memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East, vis-à-vis the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Accordingly, set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares the proposed agreement as provided by Far East to the standard provisions under Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares Far East’s proposed agreement to Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”). Set forth below, under each referenced provision of the Preston Form, I have assessed such provision under the Far East form.

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).

Our client, NetRight (the “Company”) wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises (“Far East”), an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement (“Preston Form”).

NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India.

This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. This memorandum compares each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.

NetRight wants to outsource diagnostic testing and quality assurance services to Far East Enterprises, an independent contractor in India. In this memorandum I compare each provision of Far East’s proposed agreement to a similar provision in Preston’s standard Contractor Agreement.