amplification of twists in magnetic flux tubes youra taroyan department of physics, aberystwyth...
TRANSCRIPT
Amplification of twists in magnetic flux tubes
Youra Taroyan
Department of Physics, Aberystwyth University, email: [email protected]
users.aber.ac.uk/djp12
Brief chronology of Alfvén waveshttp://www.plasma-universe.com
1942: Alfvén theorises the existence of electromagnetic-hydromagnetic waves: "If a conducting liquid is placed in a constant magnetic field ... a kind of combined electromagnetic-hydrodynamic wave is produced."
1947: Alfvén suggests heating of the solar corona by these waves
1949: Laboratory experiments by Lundquist produce such waves in magnetised mercury
1949: Enrico Fermi uses Alfvén waves in his theory of cosmic rays.
1958: Alfvén waves detected in the ionosphere after a nuclear test explosion…
Basic properties of Alfvén waves
• Result from the competing effects between magnetic tension and plasma inertia
• Incompressible (no variations in pressure, density or magnetic field strength) not easy to detect!
• Able to carry large amounts of energy along field lines
• Propagation speed
• In non-uniform media may couple linearly or non-linearly to other types of waves
Dissipation of Alfvén waves in the atmospherePhase mixing
• Heyvartes & Priest (1983): generation of small transverse scales as Alfven waves propagate in an inhomogeneous magnetic field
• Coronal heating, wind acceleration: Browning (1991), Hood et al (1997), Ruderman et al (1998)
• A diverging magnetic field enhances the efficiency of phase mixing, whereas gravitational stratification diminishes the mechanism (De Moortel et al 2000).
• In open structures dissipation occurs only within several solar radii (Parker 1991, Ofman & Davila 1995)
• Non-linear Alfven waves phase mixing visco-resistive heating bulk flows (outflows) (McLaughlin et al 2011)
Dissipation of Alfvén waves in the atmosphereResonant absorption
• Ionson (1978), Lee & Roberts (1986), Goossens et al (1992), Ofman & Davila (1994), Erdelyi et al (1995), Ruderman et al (1997), Ruderman & Roberts (2002), Soler et al (2011)
Dissipation of Alfvén waves in the atmosphereNonlinear mode conversion
1.5D simulations of loop heating by Antolin & Shibata (2010):
• The regimes under which Alfven wave heating produces hot and stable coronae are found to be rather narrow;
• Independently of the photospheric wave amplitude and magnetic field, a corona can be produced and maintained only for long (>80 Mm) loops.
• Explanation: necessary distance for shock formation ~ wavelength but the wave has barely the distance to propagate 1 wavelength before reaching the other footpoint
Footprints and forward modellingDissipation of Alfvén waves in the atmosphere
Alfvén wave turbulence
• Hollweg (1986), Buchlin et al (2007), van Ballegooijen et al (2011): Alfven waves that travel along the flux tube, reflect due to gradients in Alfven speed, and generate turbulence via nonlinear wave–wave interactions.
Observational context
Alfvén waves in flux tubes simultaneous blue and red shifts nonthermal broadening of a spectral line profile
Doschek et al (1976), Dere & Mason (1993), Doyle et al (1998), Chae (1998)
Observational context
Jess et al. (2009) studied H-alpha absorption profiles with SST and found FWHM oscillations with an amplitude of 3 km/s accompanied by a blueshift of 23 km/s.
Observational context
Marsch et al. (2009)
Examples of other similar observations: Xia et al. (2003, 2004), McIntosh (2009, 2011) …
Is there coupling between Alfven waves and flows? How do they interact?
Questions
x=L
B0
00 ,, Acu
00 ,, Acu
x=0
0)(20
220
00
2
2
2
bu
cu
xu
xbu
xtt
b A
A ‘simple’ model
Stability analysis
Apply t -> ω Laplace transform
Connect the solutions in the + and – regions at x=L
Invert and determine the response of the system to an arbitrary perturbation
Response depends on the location of singularities in the complex ω plane
Location of singularities depends on the sign of Acuu 00
Case 1: incompressible flow 000 Acuu
0u
0u
Tran
sverse p
erturb
ation
Case 2: compressible flow 000 Acuu
0u
0u
Tran
sverse p
erturb
ation
Case 3: compressible flow 000 Acuu
0u
0u
Tran
sverse p
erturb
ation
Conclusions from the simple model
An instability exists when the flow is compressible enough
Over-reflection at the interface
No shear required
Sub-sonic and sub-Alfvenic flow
Taroyan, PRL 2008
s=0 s=L
0u
cu00u
0B- +Corona
l l
Taroyan, ApJ 2009
Taroyan, A&A 2015
Steady State
Linear twists
Stability analysis
Divide the tube into two parts: variable flow for 0<s<L and constant flow for s>L
Find numerical solutions in 0<s<L and analytical solutions in s>L
Connect the solutions at x=L
Solve the resulting numerical dispersion relation and find the complex frequencies, i.e., determine stability of the system to an arbitrary twist
Alfven speed
Subsonic flow Supersonic flow
Magnetic field
Alfven speed
Flow
Magnetic field
Peter (2001)
Conclusions
Steady state derived
Stratified flux tubes with smooth flow profiles are unstable with respect to linear torsional perturbations
Observational signature: - below over-reflection height; - above
Example: Photospheric sound speed 8 km/s, Alfven speed 10km/s, flow speed 4 km/s, distance of reflection height 250 km: amplification factor of 100 in about 10 min
• Nonlinear Evolution of the twists?
Rankine-Hugoniot Conditions
http://wonka.physics.ncsu.edu/pub/VH-1/bproblems.php
Twisting a magnetic shock tube
𝜕𝜕𝑡∫𝑥1
𝑥2
𝑒𝑑𝑥=𝐹 (𝑥1 )−𝐹 (𝑥2 )
aa
Chae et al. (1998), De Pontieu et al. (2014)
Conclusions
Steady state derived
Stratified flux tubes with smooth flow profiles are unstable with respect to linear torsional perturbations
Observational signature: - below over-reflection height; - above
Example: Photospheric sound speed 8 km/s, Alfven speed 10km/s, flow speed 4 km/s, distance of reflection height 250 km: amplification factor of 100 in about 10 min
Non-linear evolution of twist studied in magnetic shock tube
Kinetic energy of the flow extracted by the twist part of which converted back into kinetic energy in the upper regions.
Enough flux generated to heat corona and possibly chromosphere.