&rqvxowdwlrq 6wdwhphqw $xjxvw laxfield
TRANSCRIPT
Laxfield Neighbourhood Plan
2018 -2036
Prepared by Laxfield Parish Council with the support of Places4People Planning Consultancy August 2020
Contents 1. Introduction 3
2. Background to the Preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan 4
3. How the plan was prepared and the consultation process 5
Appendix 1 – Consultees Notification 9
Appendix 2 – Statutory Consultees List 10
Appendix 3 – Consultation Leaflet 12
Appendix 4 – Pre-Submission Consultation Drop-in Event Display Boards 13
Appendix 5 – Consultation Response Form 25
Appendix 5 – Summary of Responses to Consultation Responses 46
Appendix 6 - Responses received to Pre-Submission Consultation, Responses to Comments and Proposed Changes 61
Appendix 7 - Schedule of Changes following the Regulation 14 Pre-Submission Consultation Stage 113
3
1. Introduction
1.1 This consultation statement has been prepared to fulfil the legal obligations of the Neighbourhood Planning Regulations 2012 in respect of the Laxfield Neighbourhood Plan (LNP).
1.2 The legal basis of this Consultation Statement is provided by Section 15(2) of the 2012 Neighbourhood Planning Regulations, which requires that a consultation statement should:
contain details of the persons and bodies who were consulted about the proposed neighbourhood development plan;
explain how they were consulted; summarise the main issues and concerns raised by the persons consulted; and describe how these issues and concerns have been considered and, where relevant addressed
in the proposed neighbourhood development plan.
1.3 The policies contained in the LNP are a result of extensive engagement and consultation with residents of Laxfield as well as other statutory bodies. Work has involved a household questionnaire, a young adults questionnaire, and a number of public meetings and consultation events at appropriate stages during the preparation of the plan.
4
2. Background to the Preparation of the Neighbourhood Plan 2.1 In 2018 the Parish Council decided, as a result of research carried out towards the end of 2017, that
there was clear evidence that parishioners believed it was important to develop a Neighbourhood Plan for the Parish.
2.2 A Working Party of the Parish Council was formed in February 2018, comprising Parish Council representatives and also, importantly, other volunteers who live in the parish. Following a community consultation event in July 2018, a number of themes were identified as matters that should be addressed in the Neighbourhood Plan:
Settlement pattern and spatial policy Housing demand and development opportunities Built environment and design Natural environment Amenities and services Businesses, employment and makers Transport, infrastructure and distribution links
2.3 Laxfield Parish Council, for purposes of the Localism Act, is the “qualifying body” and has prepared
the plan with the assistance of a working group of volunteers and supported by Places4People Planning Consultancy. This has been assisted by grant funding from the Government Neighbourhood Planning Grant Initiative via Locality, for which the Parish Council is grateful.
5
3. How the plan was prepared and the consultation process
3.1 The Neighbourhood Plan has been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Government’s Neighbourhood Planning Regulations and, in particular, has involved considerable local community engagement to gather evidence for the content of the plan and later inform the plan’s direction and policies. The content of the Neighbourhood Plan has been generated and led by the community and shaped by results of surveys and drop-in events, to ensure that the Neighbourhood Plan reflects the aspirations of the community.
Neighbourhood Area Designation
3.2 The Neighbourhood Plan Area, covering the whole of the parish, was designated by Mid Suffolk District Council in February 2018. The designated area is illustrated on the map below.
6
Initial Engagement - March-June 2018 3.3 Initial engagement and consultation activity included meetings and workshops with community
groups and representatives from other relevant organisations to discuss the development of a Neighbourhood Plan for Laxfield, and to gain an initial understanding of the concerns and aspirations of local people. These included:
Bell ringers group Allotment holders Horticultural Society Walking Group Museum Village Hall Committee Church and Chapel
Primary and High Schools Pre-school Village pubs Over-60s lunch session Annual Parish Meeting Community Feast
‘Living Laxfield’ public event – 7th July 2018 3.4 A drop-in event held in the Village Hall, with displays and people available to answer questions,
giving residents the opportunity to explore and discuss issues relating to seven themes which had been developed from the previous consultation activity. This generated a valuable collection of views which informed the household questionnaire and fed into the plan itself. The feedback from the event can be found on Evidence page of the Neighbourhood Plan website.
Parish questionnaires – October 2018
3.5 All households received an invitation for household members to participate in either a Household or a Young Adults questionnaire, available online or as hard copy. The questionnaires were entirely anonymous, apart from a randomly generated ID for each response. The forms were analysed via a software package provided by Community Action Suffolk, which allowed the results to be produced in a number of different ways. Free text input from respondents was also encouraged. The outcomes are available on the Evidence page of the Neighbourhood Plan website.
7
Public consultation event – 4th May 2019 3.6 The event was laid out as a series of themed tables, complete with survey findings, maps,
photographs and drawings, to illustrate many of the assets the village already has and how some elements might be developed. Members of the Neighbourhood Planning Group and other willing helpers were on hand to discuss the different topics and take notes about the discussions. The outcomes are available on the Evidence page of the Neighbourhood Plan website.
Public consultation event – 12th October 2019
3.7 The primary focus of this event was the policies that it was proposed would be included in the Neighbourhood Plan, although of course the supporting material was also available to set the policies in context. The outcomes are available on the Evidence page of the Neighbourhood Plan website.
Regulation 14 Pre-submission Consultation
3.8 On 13th January 2020 the formal Pre-submission Draft Plan was approved for publication by the Parish Council. A statutory consultation period of 6 weeks and 2 days was initiated on Saturday 22nd February, ending on Monday 6th April 2020. At the start of the consultation, all the statutory Regulation 14 consultees (as advised by Mid Suffolk District Council) were consulted. The full list of bodies consulted is shown in Appendix 1 and the letter used to notify them is included at Appendix 2.
How we publicised the consultation 3.9 The consultation period began with a drop-in session and exhibition held in the Village Hall on
Saturday 22nd February 2020 from 10am until 4pm. Flyers promoting the event (illustrated in appendix 3) were delivered to every household, and a large notice was posted on the railings outside the Church; it was also advertised on the Parish Council notice boards and website, in the Parish Magazine, at the Community Market and on social media. The session was very well-attended, with many people spending a considerable amount of time studying the displays and asking questions; a number completed their consultation responses at the event. Display boards summarised the content of the Plan and provided details of all the planning policies, and copies of the draft Neighbourhood Plan were available to read. Copies of the pre-submission draft display boards are shown at Appendix 4.
8
3.10 A series of further events was arranged in February and March at different times and venues around the village so that anyone who had been unable to attend the initial launch had further opportunities to consider the display material and ask questions before completing their response forms. Three of the five events actually took place; the remaining two were cancelled because of the Covid-19 pandemic.
3.11 The Draft Plan and the display material was made available on the Neighbourhood Plan pages of the Parish Council website together with the supporting documents that had been prepared to inform the content of the Plan. A comments form, included at Appendix 5, was also devised and available for completion throughout the consultation period, either online or in paper format. Paper copies of the Plan were available on loan and hard copy comments forms were made available for those who did not have access to these online.
3.12 Details of the responses received during the pre-submission consultation period are detailed in the table in Appendix 6 below. The table also includes the response to the comments and what changes were made as a result of the comment. Appendix 7 identifies all the changes made to the Pre-Submission Plan to form the Submission Plan.
Ongoing publicity and community engagement 3.13 During the whole Neighbourhood Plan development process, there has been regular publicity,
awareness raising and community engagement. Updates have been published in the monthly Parish Magazine and presented at Parish Council meetings, and on the Parish Council noticeboard. Residents and those with an interest in the Plan were welcome to attend Working Group meetings throughout the development process.
9
Appendix 1 – Consultees Notification
Dear LAXFIELD (SUFFOLK) NEIGHBOURHOOD PLAN – PRE-SUBMISSION CONSULTATION (REGULATION 14) As part of the requirements of the Localism Act 2011 and Regulation 14 of the Neighbourhood Planning (General) Regulations 2015 (as amended), Laxfield Parish Council is undertaking a Pre-Submission Consultation on the Draft Laxfield Neighbourhood Plan. As a body/individual we are required to consult, we are hereby seeking your views on the Draft Neighbourhood Plan. The full plan and supporting documents can be viewed here together with information on how to send us your comments. This Pre-Submission Consultation runs for a period of 6 weeks, between 22 February 2020 and 6 April inclusive. We look forward to receiving your comments.
10
Appendix 2 – Statutory Consultees List Position Company / Organisation Corporate Manager - Spatial Planning BMSDC SCC Neighbourhood Planning Suffolk County Council Transport Policy Suffolk County Council Planning Obligations Manager Suffolk County Council Area Manager, Norfolk & Suffolk Team Homes & Communities Agency (HCA) Land Use Operations Natural England Essex, Norfolk & Suffolk Sustainable Places Team Environment Agency East of England Office Historic England East of England Office National Trust Town Planning Team Network Rail Infrastructure Limited Highways England Stakeholders & Networks Officer Marine Management Organisation Vodafone and O2 - EMF Enquiries EE (part of the BT Group) Three Estates Planning Support Officer Ipswich & East Suffolk CCG & West Suffolk CCG Transco - National Grid Consultant Wood Plc (obo National Grid) Infrastructure Planning North UK Power Networks Strategic and Spatial Planning Manager Anglian Water Essex & Suffolk Water National Federation of Gypsy Liaison Groups Norfolk & Suffolk Gypsy Roma & Traveller Service Diocese of St Edmundsbury & Ipswich Chief Executive Suffolk Chamber of Commerce Senior Growing Places Fund Co-ordinator New Anglia LEP Strategy Manager New Anglia LEP Conservation Officer RSPB Conservation Officer (Essex, Beds & Herts) RSPB Senior Planning Manager Sport England (East) Suffolk Constabulary Suffolk Wildlife Trust Director Suffolk Preservation Society Suffolk Preservation Society Community Dev' Officer – Rural Affordable Hsg Community Action Suffolk Senior Manager Community Engagement Community Action Suffolk AONB Officer (Joint AONBs Team) Suffolk Coast & Heath AONB Theatres Trust East Suffolk Internal Drainage Board MP for Central Suffolk & North Ipswich MP for Suffolk Coastal County Cllr to Hoxne & Eye Division Suffolk County Council County Cllr to Framlingham Division Suffolk County Council County Cllr to Thredling Division Suffolk County Council Ward Cllr to Stradbroke & Laxfield Mid Suffolk District Council Ward Cllr to Kelsale & Yoxford East Suffolk Council Ward Cllr to Framlingham East Suffolk Council Ward Cllr to Fressingfield Mid Suffolk District Council Parish Clerk Fressingfield Parish Council Parish Clerk Stradbroke Parish Council
11
Position Company / Organisation Parish Clerk Wilby Parish Council Parish Clerk Ubbeston Parish Council Parish Clerk Brundish Parish Council Parish Clerk Dennington Parish Council Parish Clerk Badingham Parish Council Parish Clerk Cratfield Parish Council
12
Appendix 3 – Consultation Leaflet
13
Appendix 4 – Pre-Submission Consultation Drop-in Event Display Boards
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Appendix 5 – Consultation Response Form
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
Appendix 5 – Summary of Responses to Consultation Responses
1. Chapters 1 – 3 Do you support the content of Chapters 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
2. Do you support the Vision and Objectives in Chapter 6?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
3. Policy LAX 1 - Spatial Strategy Do you support the policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No
4.08% 2
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
4. Chapter 7. Not including Policy LAX1, do you support Chapter 7?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
47
5. Policy LAX 2 - Housing Development Do you support the content of this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
6. Policy LAX 3 - Land at Mill Road Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
82.98% 39
2 No
8.51% 4
3 No opinion
8.51% 4
answered 47
skipped 2
7. Policy LAX 4 - Land off Cullingford Close Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
87.50% 42
2 No
4.17% 2
3 No opinion
8.33% 4
answered 48
skipped 1
8. Policy LAX 5 - Affordable Housing on Rural Exception Sites Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
87.23% 41
2 No
8.51% 4
3 No opinion
4.26% 2
answered 47
skipped 2
48
9. Do you support Community Action 1?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
10. Policy LAX 6 - Housing Mix Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
11. Policy LAX 7 – Measures for New Housing Development Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
91.84% 45
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
6.12% 3
answered 49
skipped 0
12. Chapter 8. Other than Policies LAX 2 to LAX 7 do you support the remaining contents of Chapter 8?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
49
13. Policy LAX 8 – Buildings of Local Significance Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
14. Policy LAX 9 – Heritage Assets Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
15. Do you support Community Action 2?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
16. Policy LAX 10 – Dark Skies Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
50
17. Policy LAX 11 – Design Considerations Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
18. Do you support Community Action 3?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
91.84% 45
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
8.16% 4
answered 49
skipped 0
19. Policy LAX 12 – Sustainable Construction Practices Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
20. Do you support Community Action 4?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
51
21. Chapter 9. Other than Policies LAX 8, LAX 9, LAX 10, LAX 11 and LAX 12, do you support the remaining contents of Chapter 9?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
22. Policy LAX 13 – Protection of Landscape Setting of Laxfield Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
23. Policy LAX 14 – Biodiversity Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
100.00% 49
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
24. Policy LAX 15 – Local Green Spaces Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
52
25. Do you support Community Action 5?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
26. Do you support Community Action 6?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
27. Do you support Community Action 7?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
28. Do you support Community Action 8?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
53
29. Do you support Community Action 9?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.88% 46
2 No
4.08% 2
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
30. Chapter 10. Other than Policies LAX 13, LAX 14 and LAX 15, do you support the remaining contents of Chapter 10?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
31. Policy LAX 16 – Protecting Existing Services and Facilities Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
32. Policy LAX 17 – Open Space, Sport and Recreation Facilities Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.83% 46
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.17% 2
answered 48
skipped 1
54
33. Do you support Community Action 10?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
100.00% 49
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
34. Do you support Community Action 11?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.88% 46
2 No
4.08% 2
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
35. Do you support Community Action 12?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
100.00% 49
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 49
skipped 0
36. Do you support Community Action 13?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
100.00% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion 0.00% 0
answered 48
skipped 1
55
37. Do you support Community Action 14?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
38. Do you support Community Action 15?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
39. Chapter 11. Other than Policies LAX 16 and LAX 17, do you support the remaining contents of Chapter 11?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
40. Policy LAX 18 – New Businesses and Employment Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
56
41. Policy LAX 19 – Farm Diversification Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
91.67% 44
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
8.33% 4
answered 48
skipped 1
42. Do you support Community Action 16?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.88% 46
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
6.12% 3
answered 49
skipped 0
43. Do you support Community Action 17?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.75% 45
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
6.25% 3
answered 48
skipped 1
44. Chapter 12. Other than Policies LAX 18 and LAX 19, do you support the contents of Chapter 12?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
57
45. Policy LAX 20 – Public Rights of Way Do you support this policy?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
46. Do you support Community Action 18?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
47. Do you support Community Action 19?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.08% 2
answered 49
skipped 0
48. Do you support Community Action 20?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
91.84% 45
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
6.12% 3
answered 49
skipped 0
58
49. Do you support Community Action 21?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.96% 48
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
50. Do you support Community Action 22?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
97.92% 47
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
2.08% 1
answered 48
skipped 1
51. Do you support Community Action 23?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.92% 47
2 No
2.04% 1
3 No opinion
2.04% 1
answered 49
skipped 0
52. Do you support Community Action 24?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
89.58% 43
2 No
4.17% 2
3 No opinion
6.25% 3
answered 48
skipped 1
59
53. Do you support Community Action 25?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
87.50% 42
2 No
4.17% 2
3 No opinion
8.33% 4
answered 48
skipped 1
54. Chapter 13. Other than Policy LAX 20, do you support the contents of Chapter 13?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.75% 45
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
6.25% 3
answered 48
skipped 1
55. Chapter 14. Do you support the contents of Chapter 14?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
95.74% 45
2 No 0.00% 0
3 No opinion
4.26% 2
answered 47
skipped 2
56. Policies Map Do you support the contents of the Policies Map, including the Village Centre Inset Map?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
93.75% 45
2 No
4.17% 2
3 No opinion
2.08% 1
answered 48
skipped 1
60
57. Appendices Do you have any comments on the Appendices?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
23.91% 11
2 No
71.74% 33
3 No opinion
4.35% 2
answered 46
skipped 3
58. Do you have any other comments on the Draft Neighbourhood Plan?
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
45.83% 22
2 No
54.17% 26
answered 48
skipped 1
59. Would you like to be notified when the Parish Council submits the Plan to Mid Suffolk District Council? (if yes, please provide either address or email address above)
Response Percent
Response Total
1 Yes
72.34% 34
2 No
27.66% 13
answered 47
skipped 2
61
Appe
ndix
6 -
Resp
onse
s re
ceiv
ed to
Pre
-Sub
mis
sion
Con
sulta
tion,
Res
pons
es to
Com
men
ts a
nd P
ropo
sed
Chan
ges
The
tabl
es in
this
appe
ndix
set o
ut th
e co
mm
ents
that
wer
e re
ceiv
ed d
urin
g th
e Pr
e-Su
bmiss
ion
Cons
ulta
tion
Stag
e an
d th
e re
spon
ses a
nd c
hang
es m
ade
to th
e Pl
an a
s a re
sult
of th
e co
mm
ents
. Th
e ta
ble
is la
id o
ut in
Pla
n or
der w
ith th
e ge
nera
l com
men
ts fo
llow
ing
the
com
men
ts o
n th
e po
licie
s.
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Ch
apte
rs 1
, 2, 3
, 4 a
nd 5
M C
olem
an
Ye
s - it
will
be
good
to h
ave
up-t
o-da
te p
lans
and
sugg
este
d ac
tion
from
thes
e, w
hich
refe
renc
e pr
esen
t ide
as.
Not
ed
Non
e
L Br
ydso
n
I ful
ly su
ppor
t the
con
tent
s of C
haps
1 -
5, in
par
ticul
ar I
am im
pres
sed
that
the
issue
s fac
ing
the
villa
ge h
ave
been
reco
gnise
d an
d ar
ticul
ated
an
d th
at a
goo
d ba
lanc
e ha
s bee
n st
ruck
bet
wee
n se
ekin
g to
pre
serv
e th
e un
ique
cha
ract
er o
f Lax
field
whi
lst re
cogn
ising
the
need
to p
lan
for
the
futu
re. A
n ar
ea o
f con
cern
for m
e, h
owev
er, i
s the
app
aren
t di
ffere
nce
of o
pini
on b
etw
een
our v
illag
e an
d th
e M
SDC
as to
wha
t co
nstit
utes
"sm
all s
cale
hou
sing
grow
th to
mee
t loc
al n
eeds
" in
a pr
imar
y vi
llage
as e
vide
nced
by
outli
ne p
lann
ing
for a
pot
entia
l de
velo
pmen
t of a
bout
70
hous
es m
ore
suite
d to
a sm
all t
own .
Not
ed
Non
e
C Em
eny
I f
ully
supp
ort t
he w
ork
done
to d
ate
on th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n an
d ho
pe th
at w
ith it
s ado
ptio
n w
e ca
n tru
ly h
ave
som
e co
ntro
l ove
r bu
ildin
g in
the
villa
ge b
ound
ary
area
.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Alch
in
1:
Pro
vide
s a c
ompr
ehen
sive/
accu
rate
acc
ount
of L
axfie
ld's
deve
lopm
ent a
nd h
istor
y. 2:
It is
ESS
ENTI
AL th
at L
axfie
ld h
as a
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
to e
nabl
e de
velo
pmen
t tha
t ref
lect
s loc
al n
eeds
, tha
t res
pect
the
envi
ronm
ent,
wish
es a
nd o
f the
Vill
age
popu
latio
n - w
ho a
re n
ot o
ppos
ed to
de
velo
pmen
t but
are
una
nim
ous i
n th
e be
lief t
hat s
mal
l (10
hou
ses
max
) bui
lds a
re th
e ap
prop
riate
way
forw
ard.
Th
is is
a co
mpr
ehen
sive
and
deta
iled
sect
ion,
evi
denc
ing
the
signi
fican
t w
ork
unde
rtake
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
R W
inn
4.
1 I a
bsol
utel
y su
ppor
t the
vie
w th
at m
ore
smal
ler,
truly
affo
rdab
le
hom
es a
re n
eede
d fo
r cur
rent
and
futu
re re
siden
ts. I
hav
e a
prob
lem
w
ith th
e nu
mbe
r of s
mal
ler p
rope
rties
(inc
ludi
ng n
ew b
uild
s) th
at a
re
Not
ed
Non
e
62
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n bo
ught
up
as in
vest
men
t pro
perti
es a
nd ra
rely
-use
d ho
liday
hom
es -
ther
efor
e em
pty
muc
h of
the
year
and
flee
tingl
y oc
cupi
ed b
y vi
sitor
s w
ho st
ock
up u
sing
Wai
trose
hom
e de
liver
y ra
ther
than
supp
ortin
g ou
r lo
cal C
oop.
Yes
, thi
s cre
ates
an
inco
me
for s
ome
in o
ur c
omm
unity
, but
if
Laxf
ield
is b
eing
ask
ed to
giv
e up
its g
reen
spac
es to
pro
vide
new
ho
uses
, is t
here
any
way
of e
nsur
ing
they
pro
vide
real
, nee
ded
hom
es?
4.
1 Gr
een
spac
es -
yes p
leas
e! W
e ne
ed to
pro
vide
eno
ugh
park
ing,
too,
so
that
peo
ple
don'
t par
k on
the
gree
nsw
ard
dow
n th
e m
ain
Stre
et.
G
Ayre
TiDI
-2: E
mpl
oy 'l
ollip
op' p
erso
n to
supe
rvise
chi
ldre
n cr
ossin
g ra
od a
t sc
hool
tim
es.
TIDI
-4: S
ugge
st p
edes
trian
cro
ssin
g ap
prox
imat
ely
oppo
site
'Gen
eral
W
olf'
hous
e.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Wor
thin
gton
Page
4 v
alua
ble
supp
ort t
o na
viga
ting
way
aro
und
the
repo
rt.
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
ns e
qual
ly im
porta
nt a
s pol
icies
, sho
uld
be li
sted
in
cont
ents
Agre
ed
Cont
ents
pag
e to
be
upda
ted
to
inclu
de C
omm
unity
Act
ions
J Ree
ve
TI
DI5
Lack
of p
ublic
tran
spor
t is t
he m
ajor
con
cern
. N
oted
N
one
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
HDI-3
;TID
I-5; B
EMI-1
; TID
I-2; T
IDI-4
; BEM
-3
I agr
ee th
at L
axfie
ld is
in n
eed
of lo
w c
ost h
ousin
g. T
his h
as to
be
depe
nden
t on
publ
ic tra
nspo
rt be
ing
impr
oved
, pa
rkin
g at
the
scho
ol
and
taki
ng in
to a
ccou
nt in
crea
sing
deliv
ery
vehi
cles a
nd th
e la
ck o
f su
ppor
t for
loca
l bus
ines
ses.
ASI-6
Thi
s was
the
only
men
tion
of H
artis
mer
e Ho
use
whi
ch u
sed
to b
e Su
ppor
tive
Hous
ing
but n
ow h
as o
nly
a pa
rt-tim
e w
arde
n w
ith n
o ov
erni
ght o
r wee
kend
cov
er.
This
mea
ns th
at p
eopl
e w
ith c
are
need
s m
ay h
ave
to le
ave
the
villa
ge.
Not
ed
Non
e
M G
odfre
y
In p
artic
ular
the
lack
of p
arki
ng n
ear t
he sh
op a
nd th
e sc
hool
is a
n iss
ue.
Not
ed
Non
e J G
raha
m &
R
Mat
thew
s
As la
ndow
ners
of t
he m
eado
w, r
efer
red
to in
the
repo
rt as
Mob
bs
Mea
dow
, we
cann
ot a
gree
that
ther
e ha
s bee
n go
od c
omm
unity
en
gage
men
t in
crea
ting
this
plan
. We
subm
itted
our
site
to th
e Pa
rish
in
2018
as a
pos
sible
site
for d
evel
opm
ent.
We
wer
e in
form
ed th
at w
e w
ould
be
kept
upd
ated
but
ther
e ha
s nev
er b
een
any
feed
back
/ co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith u
s. Ho
w c
an a
pla
n be
com
pile
d in
cludi
ng d
ecisi
ons
abou
t the
futu
re o
f our
land
with
out a
ny c
onta
ct o
r con
sulta
tion
with
us
. Thi
s see
ms u
nacc
epta
ble
and
imm
oral
.
The
prep
arat
ion
of th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ha
s gon
e be
yond
the
min
imum
re
quire
men
ts se
t out
by
the
Gove
rnm
ent R
egul
atio
ns.
The
pre-
subm
issio
n co
nsul
tatio
n on
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
has
prov
ided
the
form
al c
onsu
ltatio
n
Non
e
63
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n op
portu
nity
to m
ake
repr
esen
tatio
ns a
bout
the
land
in
ques
tion.
An
onym
ous
I
thin
k th
e ke
y iss
ues
have
bee
n w
ell
capt
ured
in C
h 4
I
parti
cula
rly e
ndor
se H
D1 --
can
MSD
C an
d o
ur e
lect
ed m
embe
r be
invi
ted
to a
ckno
wle
dge
and
end
orse
this
poin
t and
con
firm
ing
or
othe
rwise
that
they
do
not
conf
lict w
ith th
eir r
ole
as th
e p
lann
ing
au
thor
ity
Not
ed
Non
e
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
Publ
ic Ri
ghts
of W
ay
The
SWO
T an
alys
is on
p11
is v
ery
wel
com
e, h
ighl
ight
ing
the
“aw
aren
ess
of fo
otpa
ths”
bei
ng a
wea
knes
s and
pro
vidi
ng “a
cces
sible
, all-
wea
ther
, sa
fe p
athw
ays f
or w
alke
rs, c
yclis
ts a
nd m
obili
ty sc
oote
rs” a
s an
oppo
rtuni
ty.
The
Nat
ural
Env
ironm
ent I
ssue
s (p1
3) is
also
wel
com
e by
refle
ctin
g a
dem
and
and
need
for m
ore
acce
ssib
le ri
ghts
of w
ay. C
omm
unity
Act
ion
5 co
uld
wid
en it
s sco
pe b
eyon
d “fo
ot a
nd c
ycle
pat
hs” b
y al
so re
ferri
ng
to “P
ublic
Rig
hts o
f Way
”.
Not
ed
Not
ed
Non
e N
one
Visi
on a
nd O
bjec
tives
Com
men
ts
M
Col
eman
6.1
is th
e id
ealis
tic v
iew
whi
ch I
agre
e w
ith a
nd h
just
hop
e it
is no
t too
id
ealis
tic.
Not
ed
Non
e
C Em
eny
O
rgan
ic gr
owth
is a
n ab
solu
te m
ust,
not l
arge
scal
e de
velo
pmen
ts
Not
ed
Non
e J A
lchin
The
Visio
n is
wel
l evi
denc
ed.
6.4
The
Guid
ing
Prin
ciple
s sho
uld
endu
ringl
y be
rega
rded
. N
oted
N
one
M S
teve
ns
6.
4-- T
hat
prici
pals
1 1
nd 2
sho
uld
have
mor
e pr
omin
ance
ove
r the
ot
hers
P
lann
ing
and
bein
g cli
mat
e ch
ange
read
y/aw
are
are
for m
e th
e m
ost
pres
sing.
Da
nger
is th
at so
me
will
con
cent
rate
on
the
othe
rs --
not
qui
te
fiddl
ing
whi
le L
axfie
ld /
Rom
e b
urns
but
the
re a
re e
lem
ents
of
this
for m
e
The
low
er 3
will
follo
w I
thin
k if
the
the
first
2 a
re m
ore
to th
e fo
re.
Not
ed
Non
e
64
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n R
Win
n
6.1
Spot
on!
N
oted
N
one
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
Guid
ing
prin
ciple
s - re
cycli
ng.
It sh
ould
be
poin
ted
out t
hat t
he
recy
cling
facil
ity w
hich
use
d to
be
on th
e pl
ayin
g fie
ld h
as b
een
rem
oved
.
Not
ed
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
6.1
Ful
ly e
ndor
se
6.4
-- F
irst t
wo
poin
ts s
houl
d be
show
n to
be
mos
t im
porta
nt a
nd
prom
inen
t - o
ther
poi
nts a
re i
mpo
rtant
but
I be
lieve
are
of
less
er
impo
rtanc
e an
d w
ill fo
llow
in p
art f
rom
firs
t 2 p
oint
s.
Not
ed
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
MO
ST
Not
ed
Non
e Po
licy
LAX1
– S
patia
l Str
ateg
y
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il LA
X 1
Sugg
est f
irst p
arag
raph
sim
ply
read
: “T
he N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n Ar
ea w
ill a
ccom
mod
ate
deve
lopm
ent
com
men
sura
te w
ith L
axfie
ld’s
desig
natio
n in
the
adop
ted
settl
emen
t hi
erar
chy.”
The
polic
y as
writ
ten
is co
nsist
ent
with
oth
er e
xam
ined
ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
s in
Mid
Su
ffolk
and
Bab
ergh
and
, to
mai
ntai
n co
nsist
ency
, it i
s not
co
nsid
ered
app
ropr
iate
to
inco
rpor
ate
the
requ
este
d am
endm
ent.
Non
e
D Al
chin
It sh
ould
be
emph
asise
d th
at th
e em
ergi
ng d
esig
natio
n of
the
villa
ge, a
s pr
omot
ed b
y th
e Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
in th
eir e
mer
ging
Join
t loc
al P
lan,
is a
s a
HIN
TERL
AND
villa
ge.
The
Polic
y st
ates
this
Non
e
J Alch
in
M
ost i
mpo
rtant
ly -
' the
re a
re n
o sit
es a
vaila
ble
with
in th
e se
ttlem
ent
boun
dary
for d
evel
opm
ents
of m
ore
than
four
hou
ses.
Not
ed
Non
e
M S
teve
ns
Ca
n M
SDC
and
our
ele
cted
mem
ber b
e in
vite
d to
say
if th
ey a
gree
w
ith th
is in
prin
ciple
for
thw
ith.
Th
e re
spon
se b
y M
SDC
is no
ted
abov
e N
one
G Ay
re
So
uth-
east
qua
dran
t B11
17 -
verg
e be
side
Rive
r Bly
th u
sed
to b
e a
gras
s ver
ge th
at c
ould
be
wal
ked
on. S
hrub
s hav
e be
en a
llow
ed to
gro
w
over
the
year
s and
it is
no
long
er p
ossib
le to
wal
k on
the
verg
e.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Wor
thin
gton
Polic
ies m
ap a
t end
of r
epor
t (P.
68) d
oes n
ot in
clude
bui
ldin
gs
com
plet
ed o
r und
er c
onst
ruct
ion
that
are
con
tiguo
us w
ith c
urre
nt
BUAB
.
The
map
bas
e us
es th
e m
ost u
p-to
-dat
e pu
blish
ed O
rdna
nce
Surv
ey m
appi
ng
Non
e
W S
huttl
e
The
stra
tegy
is g
ood.
Whe
n pu
tting
into
pra
ctice
with
refe
renc
e to
po
tent
ial f
utur
e de
velo
pmen
ts o
utsid
e th
e Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary
the
chal
leng
e w
ill b
e ac
hiev
ing
conc
ensu
s on
wha
t con
stitu
tes "
exce
ptio
nal
Not
ed
Non
e
65
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n us
es" i
n th
e co
ntex
t of "
iden
tifie
d lo
cal n
eeds
". (I
see
this
cove
red
in L
ax
5)
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
If
hous
e st
ock
is to
incr
ease
as r
equi
red,
the
villa
ge w
ill n
eed
to lo
ok
outs
ide
the
settl
emen
t bou
ndar
y. N
oted
N
one
Anon
ymou
s
Laxf
ield
PC
and
our
elec
ted
mem
ber
shou
ld se
ek t
o g
et th
is po
licy
en
dors
ed b
y M
SDC
, and
be
info
rmed
ASA
P th
at th
is ac
tion
is n
ow
bein
g p
ropo
sed.
Th
e se
ttlem
ent b
ound
ary
shou
ld n
ot b
reac
hed
prio
r to
the
NP
adop
tion.
Also
that
no
furth
er d
evel
opm
ent a
gree
men
t in
prin
ciple
or
in d
etai
l sho
uld
be a
gree
d b
y M
SDC
in th
e in
terim
.
The
resp
onse
by
MSD
C is
note
d ab
ove.
Pl
anni
ng d
ecisi
ons c
anno
t leg
ally
be
stop
ped
bein
g m
ade
until
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
is in
pla
ce.
Non
e
Chap
ter 7
- Oth
er C
omm
ents
M C
olem
an
Pr
efer
to re
mai
n a
Hint
erla
nd V
illag
e N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
I w
holly
agr
ee w
ith th
e se
ttlem
ent b
ound
ary
and
the
note
d ex
cept
iona
l us
es a
s ide
ntifi
ed
Not
ed
Non
e
J Wor
thin
gton
7.7
sugg
ests
that
the
prop
osed
BUA
B "r
efle
ct c
hang
es d
urin
g th
at 2
0 ye
ar p
erio
d an
d op
portu
nitie
s for
new
dev
elop
men
t tha
t will
aris
e du
ring
the
next
20
year
s"
Shou
ldn'
t rep
ort p
ropo
se h
ow n
eeds
ove
r nex
t 20
year
s for
site
s of u
p to
10
hom
es w
ithin
or c
ontig
uous
to th
e cu
rrent
BUA
B co
uld
be
prov
ided
?
The
Plan
iden
tifie
s how
the
hous
ing
requ
irem
ent d
urin
g th
e pe
riod
to 2
036
will
be
met
.
Non
e
C Ca
woo
d
SPO
-4 I'
m p
artic
ular
ly k
een
to se
e th
is ob
ject
ive
acte
d up
on.
Not
ed
Non
e Po
licy
LAX2
– H
ousi
ng D
evel
opm
ent
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
Crite
ria ii
i is,
for t
he m
ost p
art,
a re
peat
of w
ordi
ng se
t out
in th
e th
ird
para
in L
AX 1
. Qst
n: Is
this
abso
lute
ly n
eces
sary
? Th
e po
licy
as w
ritte
n is
cons
isten
t w
ith o
ther
exa
min
ed
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
ans i
n M
id
Suffo
lk a
nd B
aber
gh a
nd, t
o m
aint
ain
cons
isten
cy, i
t is n
ot
cons
ider
ed a
ppro
pria
te to
in
corp
orat
e th
e re
ques
ted
amen
dmen
t.
Non
e
M C
olem
an
N
umbe
rs sh
ould
be
adhe
red
to, w
here
pos
sible
! N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
I w
ould
like
to se
e gr
owth
but
nev
er u
p Bi
cker
s Hill
esp
ecia
lly o
n M
obb'
s mea
dow
. The
re is
onl
y on
e sit
e su
itabl
e an
d w
hy it
has
n't b
een
Mob
b’s M
eado
w is
pro
pose
d fo
r de
signa
tion
as a
Loc
al G
reen
Sp
ace,
whi
ch w
ould
rest
rict
Non
e
66
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n fu
lly e
xplo
red
I will
nev
er k
now
, wha
teve
r it c
osts
. The
site
is n
ext t
o th
e O
ld P
olice
Sta
tion,
my
reas
ons a
re a
t the
bac
k in
com
men
ts.
deve
lopm
ent o
nly
to e
ssen
tial
wor
ks.
J Alch
in
Th
e po
licie
s pro
vide
a fr
amew
ork
for a
ppro
pria
te/s
ympa
thet
ic ho
usin
g de
velo
pmen
t. N
oted
N
one
G Ay
re
W
e ag
ree
gene
rally
but
wou
ld li
ke to
see
the
%ag
e of
4 b
edro
om
hom
es re
duce
d to
25%
to g
ive
low
er in
com
e re
siden
ts a
bet
ter c
hanc
e.
Not
ed
Non
e
Polic
yLAX
3 -
Land
at M
ill R
oad
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
Sugg
est i
nclu
ding
a re
fere
nce
to M
ap 4
with
in th
e po
licy
wor
ding
. Ag
reed
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 3
as fo
llow
s: A
site
of 0
.32
hect
ares
eas
t of M
ill
Road
, as i
dent
ified
on
Map
4 a
nd o
n th
e Po
licie
s Map
, is a
lloca
ted
for
four
, thr
ee b
edro
omed
bun
galo
ws
with
acc
ess f
rom
Mill
Roa
d.
D Al
chin
It is
disa
ppoi
ntin
g th
at th
e DC
(pla
nnin
g au
thor
ity) d
id n
ot se
e fit
to
allo
w fo
r a fo
otw
ay to
be
cons
truct
ed a
long
the
Mill
Rd
front
age
to
conn
ect t
o th
e on
e pr
ovid
ed fr
om th
e Cu
lling
ford
Clo
se d
evel
opm
ent.
Th
e de
velo
pmen
t is n
earin
g co
mpl
etio
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
E Ha
wki
ns
Al
read
y be
ing
built
on.
N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
e w
ork
has a
lread
y co
mm
ence
d.
Not
ed
Non
e J W
orth
ingt
on
If
we
have
con
cern
s abo
ut d
evel
opm
ent w
hich
is a
lread
y on
site
wha
t ca
n co
uld
we
do?
The
deve
lopm
ent h
as to
com
ply
with
the
cond
ition
s atta
ched
to it
s pl
anni
ng p
erm
issio
n.
Non
e
S St
ephe
nson
Too
man
y Th
e sit
e al
read
y ha
s pla
nnin
g pe
rmiss
ion
and
the
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an c
anno
t re
voke
pla
nnin
g pe
rmiss
ions
Non
e
M S
teph
enso
n
Too
man
y Th
e sit
e al
read
y ha
s pla
nnin
g pe
rmiss
ion
and
the
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an c
anno
t re
voke
pla
nnin
g pe
rmiss
ions
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
Po
int 3
, why
is d
evel
opm
ent o
utsid
e th
e Se
ttlem
ent b
ound
ary
so
rest
ricte
d? W
hy c
an't
loca
l peo
ple
prov
idin
g lo
cal w
ork
build
on
thei
r ow
n la
nd if
it is
on
a sm
all s
cale
.
The
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an
conf
orm
s with
nat
iona
l and
loca
l pl
an p
olici
es in
seek
ing
to p
rovi
de
certa
inty
as t
o w
here
dev
elop
men
t ca
n an
d ca
nnot
take
pla
ce.
Polic
y LA
X 1
does
not
rule
out
Non
e
67
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n de
velo
pmen
t in
prov
en
exce
ptio
nal c
ircum
stan
ces w
hich
is
in li
ne w
ith p
olici
es e
lsew
here
. An
onym
ous
Al
thou
gh a
littl
e la
te.
The
site
in M
ill R
oad
allo
wed
to fo
r bui
ldin
g as
furth
er in
the
plan
ther
e ha
s bee
n a
need
for m
ore
smal
l allo
tmen
t typ
e gr
owin
g sp
ace.
Not
ed
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 4
- Lan
d of
f Cul
lingf
ord
Clos
e
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il Su
gges
t inc
ludi
ng a
refe
renc
e to
Map
5 w
ithin
the
polic
y w
ordi
ng.
Para
8.1
7 It
is no
w u
nder
stoo
d th
at th
e Jo
int L
ocal
Pla
n w
ill n
ow in
clude
po
licy
wor
ding
rela
ting
to th
e de
liver
y of
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g on
rura
l ex
cept
ion
sites
.
Agre
e. A
men
d Po
licy
LAX
4 Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 4
as fo
llow
s: A
site
of 0
.71
hect
ares
eas
t of M
ill
Road
, as i
dent
ified
on
Map
5 a
nd o
n th
e Po
licie
s Map
, is a
lloca
ted
for
thirt
een
dwel
lings
inclu
ding
four
af
ford
able
hom
es.
J Alch
in
Af
ford
able
hom
es a
re a
nd sh
ould
be
the
prio
rity
need
in fu
ture
de
velo
pmen
t. N
oted
N
one
R W
inn
Af
ford
able
hom
es -
yes p
leas
e! B
ut N
OT
for s
econ
d ho
mes
and
hol
iday
ge
taw
ays!
Not
ed. A
fford
able
hom
es h
ave
stric
t occ
upat
ion
crite
ria
Non
e
J Wor
thin
gton
To g
ive
this
polic
y m
ore
stre
ngth
shou
ld w
e dr
aft a
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n,
to b
e im
plem
ente
d w
ith th
e Pa
rish
Coun
cil.
CA c
ould
be
writ
e fo
r all
phas
ed si
tes o
f 11
hous
es a
nd a
bove
. Co
ver:
Rev
iew
of f
ist p
hase
dev
elop
men
t aga
inst
lodg
ed p
lans
and
sp
ecia
l pla
nnin
g co
nditi
ons.
Inte
grat
ion
of la
ndsc
apin
g an
d lin
ks to
su
rroun
ding
site
s. W
ork
with
pha
se 1
resid
ents
. Ide
ntify
add
ition
al
fund
ing
for i
mpr
oved
pub
lic re
al e
g su
bsid
y fo
r tre
e pl
antin
g
Not
ed
Non
e
M G
odfre
y
Affo
rdab
le/lo
w c
ost h
ousin
g. sh
ould
be
prio
ritise
d.
Not
ed
Non
e R
Holla
nd
4
"affo
rdab
le" h
omes
out
of 1
3 ho
mes
is n
ot e
noug
h. A
t lea
st h
alf o
f th
e de
velo
pmen
t sho
uld
be 3
bed
room
"affo
rdab
le" h
omes
mad
e av
aila
ble
to L
axfie
ld re
siden
ts w
ho w
ish to
up
size.
The
requ
irem
ent a
ccor
ds w
ith th
e pl
anni
ng p
erm
issio
n fo
r the
site
an
d th
e ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
ca
nnot
cha
nge
the
requ
irem
ents
.
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
Agai
n to
late
but
, hop
eful
ly le
sson
s can
be
lear
ned
to h
elp
alle
viat
e so
me
of th
e di
srup
tion
and
mes
s dur
ing
and
afte
r bui
ldin
g, a
lso th
e sit
e Th
e hi
ghw
ays a
nd a
cces
ses h
ave
been
agr
eed
by th
e Co
unty
Co
uncil
Hig
hway
s Dep
artm
ent.
Non
e
68
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n en
tranc
e is
an a
ccid
ent w
aitin
g to
hap
pen.
No
pede
stria
n ac
cess
for a
sit
e w
ith fa
mily
hom
es.
Is
ther
e a
com
plet
ion
date
on
exist
ing
sites
bef
ore
any
new
bui
ldin
gs
can
com
men
ce, a
s it w
ould
be
diffi
cult
to d
eter
min
e th
e ne
ed.
Ther
e is
no c
ompl
etio
n da
te
Polic
y LA
X 5
- Aff
orda
ble
Hou
sing
on
Rura
l Exc
eptio
n Si
tes
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
We
mak
e no
com
men
t on
this
polic
y at
this
time.
N
oted
N
one
M C
olem
an
Af
ford
able
hou
sing
is es
sent
ial
Not
ed
Non
e L
Bryd
son
W
hilst
I fu
lly su
ppor
t thi
s pol
icy, I
wou
ld li
ke to
reco
rd th
at I
have
som
e co
ncer
ns a
bout
pos
sible
clu
ster
ing
of a
fford
able
hou
sing.
I be
lieve
that
th
e po
licy
of u
sing
rura
l exc
eptio
n sit
es fo
r affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g is
a go
od
one.
I am
less
com
forta
ble
with
the
prov
ision
of l
ow c
ost h
omes
by
deve
lope
rs a
s par
t of l
arge
r dev
elop
men
ts a
nd I
hope
that
we
shal
l be
able
to a
void
that
by
mee
ting
the
need
s of t
he v
illag
e m
ore
sens
itive
ly.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Al
chin
Entir
ely
in su
ppor
t. Af
ford
able
hom
es sh
ould
be/
are
the
prio
rity
need
. N
oted
N
one
M S
teve
ns
--
-- A
nd a
dd --
--
will
larg
ely
be fo
r ren
t in
per
petu
ity,
at r
ents
af
ford
able
to
thos
e on
bel
ow l
ocal
ave
rage
hou
seho
ld i
ncom
es a
nd/o
r on
ben
efit.
The
mak
e-up
of a
fford
able
ho
usin
g te
nure
will
refle
ct th
e id
entif
ied
loca
l nee
d at
the
time
of
the
deve
lopm
ent.
Non
e
E N
ason
Why
was
n't t
he S
tradb
roke
Roa
d sit
e no
t con
sider
ed?
oppo
site
the
cem
eter
y. N
o sit
es a
re id
entif
ied
for
deve
lopm
ent t
hat w
ould
acc
ord
with
this
polic
y at
this
time.
Non
e
C Ca
woo
d
I'm o
ppos
ed to
any
hou
sing
sche
mes
out
side
the
Settl
emen
t Bou
ndar
y.
I'm p
artic
ular
ly o
ppos
ed to
any
sche
me
whe
re m
arke
t hom
es a
re
perm
itted
as I
fear
that
the
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g w
ill b
e us
ed a
s a w
hite
w
ash
for t
he b
uild
ing
of m
arke
t hom
es.
Thes
e ar
e st
rictly
con
trolle
d th
roug
h th
e pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss a
nd
The
hous
ing
asso
ciatio
n de
velo
ping
the
sche
me
wou
ld
have
to d
emon
stra
te th
roug
h a
viab
ility
ass
essm
ent t
hat t
he
affo
rdab
le h
ousin
g sc
hem
e is
not
viab
le w
ithou
t the
min
imum
el
emen
t of a
fford
able
hou
sing.
Non
e
L Hu
nt
De
pend
ent o
n ac
tual
site
s pla
nned
, oth
erw
ise su
ppor
t in
prin
ciple
N
oted
N
one
M H
unt
De
pend
ant o
n sit
es p
lann
ed. O
ther
wise
supp
ort i
n pr
incip
le
Not
ed
Non
e
69
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n E
& D
Mer
cer
I a
m c
once
rned
that
by
appr
ovin
g th
e us
e of
rura
l exc
eptio
n sit
es w
ill
crea
te a
pre
cede
nt th
at w
ill th
en b
e us
ed g
oing
forw
ard.
Exis
ting
villa
ge
infra
stru
ctur
e an
d fa
ciliti
es w
ill b
e pu
t und
er p
ress
ure
and
desig
nate
d 'g
reen
' are
as p
ut a
t risk
.
This
polic
y ap
proa
ch h
as b
een
in
plac
e fo
r man
y ye
ars t
o en
able
the
prov
ision
of a
fford
able
hou
sing
for v
illag
es. T
he a
mou
nt o
f ho
usin
g is
gene
rally
min
imal
and
su
bjec
t to
a lo
cal n
eed
bein
g id
entif
ied.
Non
e
V M
ason
We
do n
ot su
ppor
t res
iden
tial d
evel
opm
ent o
n de
signa
ted
agric
ultu
ral
land
. N
oted
N
one
H Ev
ans
Th
is sh
ould
n’t b
e th
e go
to so
lutio
n an
d it
shou
ld n
ot b
ecom
e a
loop
ho
le fo
r tho
se w
antin
g to
mak
e m
oney
on
a sit
e th
at h
as p
revi
ously
be
en tu
rned
dow
n fo
r pla
nnin
g m
any
times
bef
ore
for v
ery
good
re
ason
s whi
ch st
ill e
xist.
If us
ed c
orre
ctly
it c
ould
be
a go
od id
ea b
ut
need
s a g
reat
dea
l of p
olici
ng to
mak
e it
wor
k su
cces
sful
ly a
nd to
pr
even
t peo
ple
been
pre
ssur
ised
in to
agr
eein
g to
the
wro
ng sc
hem
es.
Not
ed
Non
e
W S
huttl
e
8.15
says
"up
to 3
5%" a
fford
able
hou
sing
in a
new
dev
elop
men
t. I
wou
ld li
ke th
ere
to b
e a
defin
ed m
inim
um re
quire
men
t for
affo
rdab
le
hom
es. C
ould
that
be
spec
ified
in th
e po
licy?
This
wou
ld n
ot c
onfo
rm w
ith
curre
nt p
lann
ing
polic
ies,
with
w
hich
the
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an
mus
t con
form
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
Hous
ing
shou
ld p
rimar
ily b
e av
aila
ble
for
rent
in p
erpe
tuity
at
rent
s pa
yabl
e to
thos
e o
n m
inim
um w
age
and
/or
bene
fit l
evel
s. Th
e de
finiti
on o
f affo
rdab
le n
eeds
to b
e cla
rifie
d fo
r the
pub
lic --
ex
actly
wha
t doe
s tha
t m
ean
and
on w
hat i
ncom
e le
vels.
I w
ould
add
to i
--- a
fford
able
in p
erpe
tuity
TO
REN
T
The
mak
e-up
of a
fford
able
ho
usin
g te
nure
will
refle
ct th
e id
entif
ied
loca
l nee
d at
the
time
of
the
deve
lopm
ent.
Ag
reed
that
a g
loss
ary
shou
ld b
e in
clude
d.
Affo
rdab
ility
doe
s not
app
ly so
lely
fo
r ren
ted
prop
erty
but
is
appl
icabl
e to
shar
ed o
wne
rshi
p pr
oper
ty to
o.
Non
e Gl
ossa
ry to
be
prov
ided
as a
n ap
pend
ix to
the
Plan
. N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 1
J A
lchin
The
Com
mun
ity L
and
Trus
t is a
n ex
celle
nt id
ea a
nd p
rom
otes
loca
l ne
ed.
Not
ed
Non
e
70
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Po
licy
LAX
6 - H
ousi
ng M
ix
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
We
mak
e no
com
men
t on
this
polic
y at
this
time
Not
ed
Non
e
D Al
chin
I acc
ept t
he p
olicy
in p
rincip
le b
ut w
ould
like
to se
e th
e %
age
of 4
be
droo
m h
omes
redu
ced
to 2
0% w
ith th
e ba
lanc
e sp
read
acr
oss 2
and
3
bedr
oom
hom
es.
Not
ed
Non
e
M C
olem
an
Th
is ne
eds t
o be
stric
tly a
dher
ed to
. N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
I t
hink
the
best
mix
wou
ld b
e 20
% 4
-bed
; 40%
3-b
ed &
40%
2-b
ed
Not
ed
Non
e L
Bryd
son
Ve
ry m
uch
supp
ort t
his -
see
note
s abo
ve.
Not
ed
Non
e W
Tho
mps
on
BU
T - t
here
mus
t be
safe
guar
ds in
pla
ce to
disc
oura
ge/p
reve
nt sm
alle
r, le
ss e
xpen
sive
hous
ing
bein
g ac
quire
d by
seco
nd h
ome
owne
rs.
Not
ed. A
fford
able
hom
es h
ave
stric
t occ
upat
ion
crite
ria
Non
e
G N
ason
Prev
ent/
disc
oura
ge se
cond
hom
e ow
ners
N
oted
. Affo
rdab
le h
omes
hav
e st
rict o
ccup
atio
n cr
iteria
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
e im
porta
nce
of b
alan
ce is
ess
entia
l.
Not
ed
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
But w
ould
add
som
ethi
ng to
effe
ct --
and
will
look
to
signi
fican
tly
redu
ce c
arbo
n em
issio
ns fr
om a
ll ne
w d
wel
lings
and
not
be
heat
ed
whe
re p
ossib
le b
y fo
ssil
/ car
bon
base
d fu
els.
M
y po
int i
s tha
t new
bui
ld s
houl
d no
t be
look
ing
to h
ave
LPG/
Oil
fu
elle
d h
eatin
g in
stal
led
as c
arbo
n ne
utra
l ele
ctric
ity is
incr
easin
gly
av
aila
ble.
Hig
her s
tand
ards
of i
nsul
atio
n w
ould
also
nee
d to
be
part
of
any
spec
ifica
tion.
The
Gove
rnm
ent i
ntro
duce
d na
tiona
l te
chni
cal s
tand
ards
for
hous
ing
in 2
015.
A W
ritte
n M
inist
eria
l Sta
tem
ent (
2015
) ex
plai
ns th
at n
eigh
bour
hood
pl
ans s
houl
d no
t set
out
any
ad
ditio
nal l
ocal
tech
nica
l st
anda
rds o
r req
uire
men
ts re
latin
g to
the
cons
truct
ion,
inte
rnal
layo
ut
or p
erfo
rman
ce o
f new
dw
ellin
gs.
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 7
– M
easu
res f
or N
ew H
ousi
ng D
evel
opm
ent
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
Ag
eing
pop
ulat
ion
As
stat
ed in
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan,
the
agei
ng p
opul
atio
n of
Lax
field
is
mor
e lik
ely
to p
refe
r sm
alle
r dw
ellin
gs fo
r dow
nsizi
ng, a
s are
firs
t-tim
e bu
yers
and
you
ng fa
mili
es. T
he C
ount
y Co
uncil
is su
ppor
tive
in p
rincip
le
of th
e pr
opos
al fo
r hom
es b
uilt
to L
ifetim
e st
anda
rd, a
s sta
ted
in P
olicy
LA
X7, h
owev
er th
e Lif
etim
es H
omes
stan
dard
has
bee
n re
plac
ed b
y th
e op
tiona
l bui
ldin
g st
anda
rd M
4(2)
. Th
e fo
llow
ing
amen
dmen
t is r
ecom
men
ded
to L
AX7
to re
flect
this;
Agre
ed
Amen
d po
licy
LAX7
as f
ollo
ws:
All n
ew d
wel
lings
shal
l ach
ieve
ap
prop
riate
inte
rnal
spac
e th
roug
h ad
here
nce
to th
e la
test
N
atio
nally
Des
crib
ed S
pace
St
anda
rds.
Prop
osal
s to
deliv
er n
ew
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t to
Lifet
ime
Hom
es st
anda
rds t
hat i
s ad
apta
ble
to B
uild
ing
Regu
latio
ns
71
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n “A
ll ne
w d
wel
lings
shal
l ach
ieve
app
ropr
iate
inte
rnal
spac
e th
roug
h ad
here
nce
to th
e la
test
Nat
iona
lly D
escr
ibed
Spa
ce S
tand
ards
. Pr
opos
als t
o de
liver
new
resid
entia
l dev
elop
men
t tha
t is a
dapt
able
to
M(4
)2 st
anda
rds i
n or
der t
o m
eet t
he n
eeds
of t
he in
crea
singl
y ag
eing
an
d fra
il po
pula
tion
with
out r
estri
ctin
g th
e ne
eds o
f you
ng fa
mili
es, w
ill
be st
rong
ly su
ppor
ted.
” Th
e ai
ms t
o m
ake
Laxf
ield
a “D
emen
tia-F
riend
ly V
illag
e” is
wel
com
e, a
s it
is im
porta
nt to
mee
t the
nee
ds o
f an
agei
ng p
opul
atio
n. T
his c
an h
elp
to re
duce
socia
l iso
latio
n in
the
elde
rly, a
nd im
prov
e ph
ysica
l and
m
enta
l wel
lbei
ng w
ith th
e op
portu
nitie
s to
mee
t in
safe
and
frie
ndly
co
mm
unity
env
ironm
ents
. Pol
icies
with
in th
e ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
cou
ld
cont
ribut
e to
war
ds th
is ai
m. T
he R
oyal
Tow
n Pl
anni
ng In
stitu
te h
as
guid
ance
on
Tow
n Pl
anni
ng a
nd D
emen
tia
http
s://w
ww
.rtpi
.org
.uk/
prac
tice/
2017
/aug
ust/
dem
entia
-and
-tow
n-pl
anni
ng/ ,
whi
ch m
ay b
e he
lpfu
l in
info
rmin
g po
licie
s. Th
e W
aven
ey
Loca
l Pla
n co
ntai
ns a
goo
d ex
ampl
e of
a “d
esig
ning
for d
emen
tia”
polic
y.
M(4
)2 st
anda
rds i
n or
der t
o m
eet t
he
need
s of t
he in
crea
singl
y ag
eing
and
fra
il po
pula
tion
with
out r
estri
ctin
g th
e ne
eds o
f you
ng fa
mili
es w
ill b
e st
rong
ly su
ppor
ted.
In
add
ition
, ins
ert s
pace
bet
wee
n fir
st
and
seco
nd se
nten
ce a
nd re
mov
e ch
arac
ter s
pace
in “s
trong
ly”
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il N
o co
mm
ent o
ther
than
to d
raw
atte
ntio
n to
the
typo
in th
e se
cond
se
nten
ce a
nd su
gges
t ins
ertin
g a
char
acte
r spa
ce b
etw
een
first
and
se
cond
sent
ence
.
Agre
ed
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
7 as
follo
ws:
Inse
rt sp
ace
betw
een
sent
ence
s. De
lete
cha
ract
er sp
ace
in “s
trong
ly”
J A
lchin
I und
erst
and
the
???
in re
cent
dev
elop
men
ts a
re e
xtre
mel
y slo
w.
N
oted
N
one
M S
teve
ns
N
ot su
re w
here
this
fits -
- hou
sing
shou
ld b
e bu
ilt to
hav
e as
low
a
carb
on fo
otpr
int a
s pra
ctica
ble
and
shou
ld n
ot in
clude
hea
ting
syst
ems
whi
ch u
se o
il , o
r LP
G . T
he fu
ture
will
see
incr
easin
g us
e of
non
-car
bon
base
d el
ectri
city
to h
eat h
omes
and
we
are
bui
ldin
g fo
r the
nex
t 50
year
s
The
Gove
rnm
ent i
ntro
duce
d na
tiona
l tec
hnica
l sta
ndar
ds fo
r ho
usin
g in
201
5. A
Writ
ten
Min
ister
ial S
tate
men
t (20
15)
expl
ains
that
nei
ghbo
urho
od
plan
s sho
uld
not s
et o
ut a
ny
addi
tiona
l loc
al te
chni
cal
stan
dard
s or r
equi
rem
ents
rela
ting
to th
e co
nstru
ctio
n, in
tern
al la
yout
or
per
form
ance
of n
ew d
wel
lings
. Th
e su
gges
tion
goes
bey
ond
wha
t pl
anni
ng p
olici
es a
re a
llow
ed to
re
quire
.
Non
e
72
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Al
l new
bui
ld m
ust i
nclu
de a
con
nect
ion
for e
lect
ric v
ehicl
es
This
requ
irem
ent i
s con
tain
ed in
Po
licy
LAX
11
J Wor
thin
gton
Ensu
re th
e m
easu
res a
pply
to b
oth
spac
e st
anda
rds w
ithin
the
hom
e an
d fo
e sp
ace
betw
een
hom
es fr
ont a
reas
and
shar
ed g
roun
ds su
ch a
s pa
rkin
g, p
lay
or re
flect
ion.
Not
ed
Non
e
Chap
ter 8
– O
ther
Com
men
ts
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il Pa
ra 8
.8 T
his p
arag
raph
mak
es tw
o re
fere
nces
to a
201
8 Se
ttlem
ent
Boun
dary
. Qst
n: W
hich
bou
ndar
y is
that
?
Para
8.9
Qst
n: S
houl
d th
e op
enin
g tw
o w
ords
(Hou
sing
Deve
lopm
ent)
appe
ar a
s a su
b-he
adin
g in
gre
en ty
pe?
The
2018
Set
tlem
ent B
ound
ary
is th
e ex
istin
g Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary
as d
efin
ed a
t the
beg
inni
ng o
f the
Pl
an p
erio
d –
ie th
at sh
own
in th
e M
id S
uffo
lk L
ocal
Pla
n Ag
reed
Non
e Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 12
as f
ollo
ws:
Dele
te c
riter
ia c
. and
renu
mbe
r su
bseq
uent
crit
eria
acc
ordi
ngly
.
J Alch
in
It
is ho
ped
the
signi
fican
ce o
f her
itage
site
s will
be
rega
rded
. N
oted
N
one
C Ca
woo
d
8.25
I'm
par
ticul
arly
kee
n on
the
prov
ision
of s
ecur
e, c
over
ed st
orag
e fo
r cy
cles.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Tre
adw
ay
W
hilst
app
recia
ting
the
sear
ch fo
r sui
tabl
e sit
es w
ithin
the
villa
ge
foot
prin
t, I w
ould
con
sider
that
onc
e th
e cu
rrent
and
pla
nned
de
velo
pmen
ts a
re c
ompl
eted
, thi
s sho
uld
suffi
ce u
ntil
a fu
rther
surv
ey o
f ne
ed is
und
erta
ken.
By
this
I mea
n th
e de
velo
pmen
t on
Mill
Roa
d (in
cludi
ng th
e pl
anne
d ar
ea st
ill to
be
built
), th
e fu
rther
are
a st
retc
hing
be
hind
the
mos
t wes
terly
hou
sing
in N
oyes
Ave
nue
and
adja
cent
to th
e pl
ayin
g fie
ld*,
the
curre
nt a
llotm
ent s
ite, t
oget
her w
ith th
e re
cent
de
velo
pmen
t on
Bick
ers H
ill.
I par
ticul
arly
con
sider
LAX
5 to
be
impo
rtant
this
rega
rd,
With
refe
renc
e to
the
larg
er d
evel
opm
ent a
long
side
the
play
ing
field
* st
ill to
be
com
men
ced,
car
e sh
ould
be
take
n to
ens
ure
a m
ix of
size
s, st
yles
, with
acc
omm
odat
ion
both
to re
nt a
nd p
urch
ase.
Oth
er
cons
ider
atio
ns a
re a
lso im
porta
nt. M
any
prop
ertie
s bui
lt by
dev
elop
ers
toda
y ar
e sm
all i
n to
tal a
rea.
It is
all
very
wel
l say
ing
that
ther
e sh
ould
be
eno
ugh
spac
e to
ext
end
into
the
roof
or t
he g
arde
n, b
ut th
e UK
is
build
ing
som
e of
the
smal
lest
hou
ses i
n vo
lum
e an
d ar
ea in
Eur
ope,
We
Not
ed. T
he P
lan
mak
es p
rovi
sion
for h
ousin
g to
203
6 bu
t it w
ill b
e ne
cess
ary
to o
ccas
iona
lly re
view
th
e Pl
an to
kee
p it
in c
onfo
rmity
w
ith th
e M
id S
uffo
lk L
ocal
Pla
n.
This
site
has p
lann
ing
perm
issio
n fo
r the
dev
elop
men
t des
crib
ed in
Po
licy
LAX
4 an
d m
atte
rs ra
ised
here
cou
ld o
nly
be c
onsid
ered
sh
ould
an
amen
ded
sche
me
be
subm
itted
for p
lann
ing
perm
issio
n. P
olicy
LAX
7 se
ts
Non
e N
one
73
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n ha
ve n
ow o
verta
ken
the
Net
herla
nds i
n th
e sm
all a
vera
ge si
ze o
f est
ate
hous
es b
eing
bui
lt.
Ofte
n th
e ga
rage
s bui
lt ar
e to
o sm
all e
xcep
t for
the
smal
lest
of c
ars a
nd
owne
rs le
ave
them
on
the
road
with
mos
t of t
he u
sing
part
of th
e pa
vem
ent t
o en
sure
ther
e is
enou
gh ro
om fo
r em
erge
ncy
vehi
cles t
o pa
ss.
Traf
alga
r Way
on
the
road
into
Diss
from
the
Bury
St E
dmun
ds R
oad
is an
exa
mpl
e of
this.
Adm
itted
ly it
was
a b
row
n fie
ld si
te b
efor
e co
nstru
ctio
n st
arte
d, b
ut it
is in
dica
tive
of w
hat c
an b
e pa
ssed
by
plan
ning
aut
horit
ies a
nd o
f cou
rse
ther
e is
the
app
allin
g sit
uatio
n in
Fr
amlin
gham
whe
re h
ouse
s an
d ro
ads w
ere
not c
onst
ruct
ed a
ccor
ding
to
the
plan
and
by
the
time
the
plan
ning
aut
horit
y ha
d di
scov
ered
the
situa
tion
it w
as to
o la
te.
Man
y ho
me
owne
rs h
ave
mor
e th
an o
ne c
ar a
nd th
is fa
cts n
eeds
to b
e bu
ilt in
to th
e pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss. O
ften
this
is be
caus
e ol
der c
hild
ren
still
liv
e at
hom
e an
d ca
nnot
affo
rd to
rent
or b
uy.
I not
e th
e us
e of
the
term
‘ava
ilabi
lity
of w
indf
all s
ites’
with
in th
e se
ttlem
ent b
ound
ary,
I hop
e th
ere
will
be
no a
ttem
pt to
em
ulat
e Tr
afal
gar W
ay. T
his w
as a
win
dfal
l for
the
deve
lope
r, no
t for
thos
e liv
ing
ther
e, w
ith a
ll th
e at
tend
ant i
ssue
s. Tw
o ar
eas i
n th
e vi
llage
that
do
caus
e co
ncer
n in
rela
tion
to th
is ar
e:
(a).T
he fi
eld,
whi
ch li
es a
t the
eas
tern
end
of T
he S
treet
, whi
ch is
on
risin
g gr
ound
and
if b
uilt
on w
ould
spoi
l the
visu
al a
spec
t of t
he v
illag
e co
mpl
etel
y. T
his i
s par
t of i
ts a
ttrac
tive
setti
ng.
(b).T
he fi
eld
oppo
site
the
scho
ol h
as, I
und
erst
and,
an
owne
r liv
ing
in
Fran
ce. I
t wou
ld b
e ea
sy fo
r thi
s to
beco
me
a ‘w
indf
all d
evel
opm
ent’
for
him
, but
disa
stro
us fo
r the
vill
age.
Thi
s wou
ldn’
t be
just
a ‘h
int o
f su
burb
ia’!
min
imum
floo
rspa
ce st
anda
rds f
or
new
dw
ellin
gs w
hen
new
pr
opos
als a
re c
onsid
ered
. N
oted
. The
Suf
folk
Par
king
Gu
idel
ines
inclu
de p
rovi
sion
for
min
imum
gar
age
sizes
. N
oted
. N
oted
. New
dev
elop
men
t has
to
mee
t the
Suf
folk
Par
king
Gu
idel
ines
min
imum
stan
dard
s. N
oted
. Pol
icies
else
whe
re in
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
addr
ess
mat
ters
such
as d
esig
n an
d im
pact
of
new
dev
elop
men
t.
Non
e N
one
Non
e N
one
Polic
y LA
X 8
– Bu
ildin
gs o
f Loc
al S
igni
fican
ce
Hi
stor
ic En
glan
d Th
ank
you
for i
nviti
ng H
istor
ic En
glan
d to
com
men
t on
the
Regu
latio
n 14
Pre
-Sub
miss
ion
Draf
t of t
he L
axfie
ld N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
74
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n W
e w
elco
me
the
prod
uctio
n of
this
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an, e
spec
ially
Po
licie
s LAX
8 a
nd 9
dea
ling
with
the
prot
ectio
n of
the
hist
oric
envi
ronm
ent.
We
cons
ider
that
thes
e po
licie
s ref
lect
a p
ositi
ve st
rate
gy
for t
he h
istor
ic en
viro
nmen
t of L
axfie
ld, a
nd a
re p
leas
ed to
not
e th
at
your
pla
n ai
ms t
o pr
otec
t bui
ldin
gs o
f loc
al si
gnifi
canc
e in
par
ticul
ar. W
e do
not
wish
to m
ake
any
furth
er c
omm
ents
at t
his t
ime
but f
or g
ener
al
advi
ce w
ould
refe
r you
to o
ur d
etai
led
guid
ance
on
succ
essf
ully
in
corp
orat
ing
hist
oric
envi
ronm
ent c
onsid
erat
ions
into
you
r ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
, whi
ch c
an b
e fo
und
here
: <h
ttps:/
/hist
orice
ngla
nd.o
rg.u
k/ad
vice
/pla
nnin
g/pl
an-m
akin
g/im
prov
e-yo
ur-n
eigh
bour
hood
/>.
For f
urth
er a
dvice
rega
rdin
g th
e hi
stor
ic en
viro
nmen
t and
how
to
inte
grat
e it
into
you
r nei
ghbo
urho
od p
lan,
we
reco
mm
end
that
you
co
nsul
t you
r loc
al p
lann
ing
auth
ority
con
serv
atio
n of
ficer
, and
if
appr
opria
te th
e Hi
stor
ic En
viro
nmen
t Rec
ord
at S
uffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
. To
avo
id a
ny d
oubt
, thi
s let
ter d
oes n
ot re
flect
our
obl
igat
ion
to p
rovi
de
furth
er a
dvice
on
or, p
oten
tially
, obj
ect t
o sp
ecifi
c pr
opos
als w
hich
may
su
bseq
uent
ly a
rise
as a
resu
lt of
the
prop
osed
pla
n, w
here
we
cons
ider
th
ese
wou
ld h
ave
an a
dver
se e
ffect
on
the
hist
oric
envi
ronm
ent.
M C
olem
an
Th
ese
build
ings
shou
ld b
e pr
eser
ved,
with
the
outlo
oks i
nvol
ved,
as
esse
ntia
l to
the
Villa
ge
Not
ed
Non
e
W T
hom
pson
- but
ther
e ar
e ra
ther
mor
e th
an sp
ecifi
ed.
Not
ed
Non
e G
Nas
on
Al
thou
gh th
ere
are
cons
ider
ably
mor
e th
an sp
ecifi
ed.
Not
ed
Non
e J A
lchin
Entir
ely.
Not
ed
Non
e S
Hepw
orth
Add:
impr
ovem
ent t
o dr
aina
ge n
ear B
ridge
Hou
se/L
ow H
ouse
car
par
k w
here
the
wat
er fl
oods
acr
oss t
he ro
ad to
reac
h th
e riv
er a
nd c
ontin
ues
dow
n to
col
lect
out
side
St M
arga
rets
in fl
ood
cond
ition
s. Th
is is
exac
erba
ted
by w
ater
floo
ding
dow
n th
e tra
ck fr
om H
igh
Barn
from
the
low
er g
ate
to H
igh
Barn
and
not
usin
g th
e di
tch
but r
unni
ng d
own
the
track
and
then
ce d
own
into
Gor
ams M
ill L
ane
past
The
Low
Hou
se a
nd
endi
ng u
p ou
tsid
e St
Mar
gare
ts. S
ever
al a
ttem
pts h
ave
prev
ious
ly b
een
tried
to fi
x th
is bu
t see
m to
hav
e m
ade
the
prob
lem
wor
se.
Not
ed
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 9
– H
erita
ge A
sset
s
75
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
• Crit
eria
c. r
efer
s to
a ‘B
uilt
Char
acte
r Ass
essm
ent’
but t
his i
s not
im
med
iate
ly o
bvio
us a
mon
gst t
he li
st o
f pub
lishe
d su
ppor
ting
docu
men
ts.
Qst
n: Is
the
refe
renc
e m
ade
in e
rror o
r has
this
supp
ortin
g do
cum
ent
not b
een
mad
e av
aila
ble
yet?
• T
his p
olicy
doe
s not
diff
eren
tiate
bet
wee
n de
signa
ted
and
non-
desig
nate
d he
ritag
e as
sets
. Whi
le it
is th
is Co
uncil
s Her
itage
Tea
m’s
view
that
all
herit
age
asse
ts sh
ould
rece
ive
the
sam
e co
nsid
erat
ion,
they
m
ake
it cle
ar th
at th
e N
PPF
does
mak
e a
dist
inct
ion.
The
refo
re, i
t sho
uld
be m
ade
clear
whi
ch a
sset
s are
bei
ng ta
lked
abo
ut. F
or e
xam
ple:
“To
ensu
re th
e co
nser
vatio
n an
d en
hanc
emen
t of t
he v
illag
e’s d
esig
nate
d an
d no
ndes
igna
ted
herit
age
asse
ts, p
ropo
sals
mus
t:”
• Our
Her
itage
Tea
m a
lso a
dvise
refe
rring
to th
e N
PPF
wor
ding
, i.e
.: “P
ropo
sals
will
not
be
supp
orte
d w
here
any
har
m -
less
than
subs
tant
ial
or su
bsta
ntia
l har
m -
caus
ed a
s a re
sult
of th
e im
pact
of a
pro
pose
d sc
hem
e is
not o
utw
eigh
ed b
y th
e pu
blic
bene
fits t
hat w
ould
be
prov
ided
.”
Para
9.1
1 Pe
nulti
mat
e lin
e. S
ugge
st fu
ll-st
op a
fter ‘
term
’ and
star
t new
se
nten
ce w
ith “W
ork
also
…”
This
docu
men
t will
be
publ
ished
w
ith th
e ot
her s
uppo
rting
do
cum
ents
(om
itted
in e
rror)
The
polic
y as
writ
ten
is co
nsist
ent
with
oth
er e
xam
ined
ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
s in
Mid
Su
ffolk
and
Bab
ergh
and
, to
mai
ntai
n co
nsist
ency
, it i
s not
co
nsid
ered
app
ropr
iate
to
inco
rpor
ate
the
requ
este
d am
endm
ent.
Agre
ed
Built
Cha
ract
er A
sses
smen
t su
ppor
ting
docu
men
t to
be p
ublis
hed
Amen
d se
cond
sent
ence
of p
ara
9.11
as
follo
ws:
It ne
eds i
nves
tmen
t in
signi
fican
t re
pair
and
mai
nten
ance
wor
k to
pr
eser
ve it
for t
he lo
ng te
rm. W
wor
k al
so n
eeds
to b
e do
ne…
….
M
Col
eman
Who
le h
earte
dly
agre
e.
Not
ed
Non
e J A
lchin
Esse
ntia
l N
oted
N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 2
M C
olem
an
Es
sent
ial t
o pr
eser
ve th
is bu
ildin
g N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
is so
unds
like
a g
ood
plan
. N
oted
N
one
Polic
y LA
X 10
– D
ark
Skie
s
76
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
We
mak
e no
com
men
t on
this
polic
y at
this
time.
N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
Bu
t low
ene
rgy
stre
et li
ghtin
g sh
ould
be
mai
ntai
ned
till m
idni
ght a
s it
curre
ntly
stan
ds. I
am
aga
inst
the
switc
hing
off
of st
reet
light
s bef
ore
this
time.
Not
ed. T
he N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ca
nnot
spec
ify ti
mes
whe
n st
reet
lig
hts a
re sw
itche
d on
.
Non
e
J Alch
in
Lig
ht p
ollu
tion
has t
he p
oten
tial t
o sig
nific
antly
impa
ct o
n th
e lo
cal
envi
ronm
ent -
onc
e ag
ain
an e
ssen
tial p
olicy
. N
oted
N
one
Anon
ymou
s
To a
deg
ree.
The
re is
a n
eed
in k
ey p
lace
s for
ligh
ting,
and
may
be a
look
at
the
indi
vidu
al h
ome
light
ing
bein
g in
stal
led
by th
e de
velo
pers
cou
ld
be lo
oked
at i
n re
gard
s to
dark
skie
s.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Tre
adw
ay
7.
Lig
htin
g.
Whe
n Th
e St
reet
was
relit
som
e tw
enty
yea
rs g
o it
was
ove
rkill
. It i
s the
so
rt of
ligh
ting
mor
e su
ited
to su
burb
an e
stat
e. It
is to
tally
out
of
keep
ing
for a
vill
age
who
se m
ain
stre
et is
a c
onse
rvat
ion
area
Not
ed
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 11
– D
esig
n Co
nsid
erat
ions
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
Fl
oodi
ng
The
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
has n
ot a
sses
sed
or re
fere
nced
the
exist
ing
flood
risk
s are
as, w
hich
ther
e is
Floo
d Zo
nes 2
and
3, a
nd a
reas
of
surfa
ce w
ater
floo
ding
. In
addi
tion,
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
has n
ot
refe
renc
ed th
e flo
odin
g th
at o
ccur
s to
resid
ents
and
com
mer
cial
prem
ises o
f Gor
ams M
ill L
ane.
It
is su
gges
ted
that
Pol
icy L
AX11
Des
ign
Cons
ider
atio
ns, p
art i
) sho
uld
inclu
de th
e fo
llow
ing
addi
tion;
“i.
do
not r
esul
t in
wat
er ru
n-of
f tha
t wou
ld a
dd to
or c
reat
e su
rface
w
ater
floo
ding
; and
shal
l inc
lude
the
use
of a
bove
gro
und
open
Su
stai
nabl
e Dr
aina
ge S
yste
ms (
SuDS
), w
hich
cou
ld in
clude
wet
land
and
ot
her w
ater
feat
ures
, whi
ch c
an h
elp
redu
ce fl
ood
risk
whi
lst o
fferin
g ot
her b
enef
its in
cludi
ng w
ater
qua
lity,
amen
ity/r
ecre
atio
nal a
reas
and
bi
odiv
ersit
y be
nefit
s;”
It is
sugg
este
d th
at th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n sh
ould
refe
r to
long
term
riv
er fl
oodi
ng ri
sk m
aps h
ttps:/
/floo
d-w
arni
ng-
info
rmat
ion.
serv
ice.g
ov.u
k/lo
ng-t
erm
-floo
d-ris
k/m
ap?lo
catio
n=la
xfie
ld+s
uffo
lk ,
and
flood
zon
es a
nd li
kelih
ood
of
flood
ing
http
s://fl
ood-
map
-for-
plan
ning
.serv
ice.g
ov.u
k/co
nfirm
-
It is
not a
requ
irem
ent o
f ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
s to
refe
r to
flood
zon
es.
The
sugg
estio
ns a
re m
ore
rele
vant
to
Pol
icy L
AX 1
2 w
here
am
endm
ents
are
pro
pose
d to
ad
dres
s som
e of
the
sugg
estio
ns
as a
ppro
pria
te a
nd to
ens
ure
cons
isten
cy w
ith o
ther
rece
ntly
ex
amin
ed P
lans
in th
e M
SDC
area
It
is no
t a re
quire
men
t of
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
ans t
o re
fer t
o th
ese.
Non
e Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 12
as f
ollo
ws:
e.
inco
rpor
ate
sust
aina
ble
desig
n an
d co
nstru
ctio
n m
easu
res
and
ener
gy e
fficie
ncy
mea
sure
s in
cludi
ng, w
here
feas
ible
, gro
und/
air
sour
ce h
eat p
umps
, pho
tovo
ltaics
, so
lar p
anel
s and
gre
y w
ater
recy
cling
an
d ra
inw
ater
and
stor
mw
ater
ha
rves
ting.
77
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n lo
catio
n?ea
stin
g=62
9608
.96&
north
ing=
2723
93.9
4&pl
aceO
rPos
tcod
e=L
axfie
ld%
2C%
20su
ffolk
, fo
und
on th
e Go
vern
men
t web
site.
It
is su
gges
ted
that
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
coul
d ad
d in
the
Land
scap
e Ch
arac
ter p
arag
raph
s, th
e de
sire
for m
ultif
unct
iona
l SuD
S th
at m
imic
the
natu
ral e
nviro
nmen
t, an
d pr
ovid
e am
enity
and
bi
odiv
ersit
y be
nefit
s.
The
follo
win
g am
endm
ents
to P
olicy
LAX
11 a
re su
gges
ted,
as t
he
curre
nt w
ordi
ng o
f par
t d) c
ould
be
over
ly re
stric
tive
as su
ch th
e fo
llow
ing
amen
dmen
t is s
ugge
sted
; d.
“… ta
king
miti
gatio
n m
easu
res i
nto
acco
unt,
do n
ot a
ffect
adv
erse
ly
resu
lt in
a si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
effe
ct o
n;” i
. “an
y th
e hi
storic
char
acte
r, ar
chite
ctur
al o
r arc
haeo
logi
cal h
erita
ge a
sset
s…”
Polic
y LA
X11:
Des
ign
Char
acte
ristic
s Pa
rt g
of th
is po
licy
stat
es; “
all v
ehicl
e pa
rkin
g is
prov
ided
with
in th
e pl
ot a
nd se
ek a
lway
s to
ensu
re p
erm
eabi
lity
thro
ugh
new
hou
sing
area
s, co
nnec
ting
any
new
dev
elop
men
t int
o th
e he
art o
f the
exis
ting
settl
emen
t;” It
is su
gges
ted
that
this
polic
y is
amen
ded
to in
clude
the
supp
ort o
f a p
ropo
rtion
of o
n-st
reet
par
king
in d
evel
opm
ents
, as s
ome
park
ing
on th
e st
reet
will
be
inev
itabl
e, fo
r exa
mpl
e by
visi
tors
, de
liver
ies a
nd tr
ades
peop
le. I
f the
re is
no
prop
erly
des
igne
d, w
ell
inte
grat
ed o
n st
reet
par
king
inco
rpor
ated
into
the
deve
lopm
ent t
his c
an
caus
e iss
ues o
f obs
truct
ion,
such
as m
ount
ing
of p
avem
ents
and
re
duce
d vi
sibili
ty.
To a
ddre
ss th
ese
issue
s the
pol
icy sh
ould
spec
ify th
at th
e de
sign,
lo
catio
n an
d la
yout
of p
arki
ng sh
ould
avo
id o
r min
imise
thes
e iss
ues.
In
add
ition
, key
issu
e HD
I-5 st
ates
that
new
dev
elop
men
t sho
uld
cons
ider
shar
ed p
arki
ng, w
hich
is u
nlik
ely
to b
e ac
hiev
able
if a
ll th
e pa
rkin
g is
prov
ided
with
in th
e pl
ot o
f a d
wel
ling.
Agre
ed
The
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
seek
s to
prov
ide
cons
isten
cy o
f pol
icies
ac
ross
Mid
Suf
folk
. As s
uch,
this
elem
ent o
f the
pol
icy is
con
siste
nt
with
oth
er n
eigh
bour
hood
pol
icies
in
Mid
Suf
folk
. A
maj
or c
once
rn in
the
villa
ge is
th
e na
rrow
ness
of t
he p
ublic
hi
ghw
ays,
as n
oted
in th
e Pl
an. A
s su
ch, i
t is n
ot c
onsid
ered
that
any
ad
ditio
nal a
llow
ance
for o
n-st
reet
pa
rkin
g sh
ould
be
mad
e on
the
exist
ing
high
way
s.
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX1
1 as
follo
ws:
d. “…
taki
ng m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s int
o ac
coun
t, do
not
affe
ct a
dver
sely
resu
lt in
a si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
effe
ct o
n;”
i. “a
ny th
e hi
stor
ic ch
arac
ter,
arch
itect
ural
or a
rcha
eolo
gica
l he
ritag
e as
sets
…”
78
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Th
e m
entio
n of
per
mea
bilit
y in
Pol
icy L
AX11
par
t g is
wel
com
e, a
s im
prov
ed c
onne
ctiv
ity c
an h
elp
to e
ncou
rage
wal
king
and
cyc
ling
for
resid
ents
. Th
e m
entio
n of
per
mea
bilit
y is
wel
com
ed h
owev
er L
AX11
cou
ld b
e fu
rther
enh
ance
d by
inclu
ding
that
mov
emen
ts o
f ped
estri
ans a
nd
cycli
sts s
houl
d be
prio
ritise
d w
ithin
dev
elop
men
ts a
nd sh
ould
con
nect
to
exis
ting
foot
way
s. h
ttps:/
/ww
w.su
ffolk
.gov
.uk/
asse
ts/c
ounc
il-an
d-de
moc
racy
/con
sulta
tions
-pet
ition
s-an
d-el
ectio
ns/R
OW
IPSu
ffolk
-Gre
en-
Acce
ss-S
trate
gy.p
df
It is
note
d th
at o
bjec
tive
TIDO
-3 st
ates
that
“Suf
ficie
nt o
ff-st
reet
par
king
sh
ould
be
inclu
ded
in n
ew b
uild
pla
ns”.
Suffo
lk G
uida
nce
for P
arki
ng
2019
(SGP
) http
s://w
ww
.suffo
lk.g
ov.u
k/as
sets
/pla
nnin
g-w
aste
-and
-en
viro
nmen
t/pl
anni
ng-a
nd-d
evel
opm
ent-
advi
ce/S
uffo
lkGu
idan
ce-fo
r-Pa
rkin
g-20
19-A
dopt
ed-b
y-SC
C.pd
f se
ts m
inim
um p
arki
ng st
anda
rds
for S
uffo
lk a
nd is
use
d by
the
High
way
Aut
horit
y in
ass
essin
g al
l re
leva
nt p
lann
ing
appl
icatio
ns.
It is
reco
mm
ende
d th
at th
e ex
plan
ator
y te
xt su
ppor
ting
Polic
y LA
X11
shou
ld m
entio
n SG
P 20
19 a
re th
e cu
rrent
rele
vant
stan
dard
s.
SCC
wel
com
es th
e pr
ovisi
on o
f ele
ctric
veh
icle
char
ging
poi
nts,
in P
olicy
LA
X11.
Th
e ab
ove
com
men
ts c
an b
e ad
dres
sed
thro
ugh
amen
dmen
ts to
Pol
icy
LAX1
1. S
ee re
com
men
ded
amen
dmen
ts to
this
polic
y be
low
. “g
. pro
duce
des
igns
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith st
anda
rds,
that
mai
ntai
n or
en
hanc
e th
e sa
fety
of t
he h
ighw
ay n
etw
ork
ensu
ring
that
all
appr
opria
te
vehi
cle p
arki
ng is
pro
vide
d w
ithin
the
plot
, a p
ropo
rtion
of p
arki
ng is
pr
ovid
ed o
n st
reet
but
is w
ell d
esig
ned,
loca
ted
and
inte
grat
ed in
to th
e sc
hem
e to
avo
id o
bstru
ctio
n to
all
high
way
use
rs a
nd v
isibi
lity
seek
al
way
s to
ensu
re p
erm
eabi
lity
thro
ugh
new
hou
sing
area
s, co
nnec
ting
any
new
dev
elop
men
t int
o th
e he
art o
f the
exis
ting
settl
emen
t, pr
iorit
ising
the
mov
emen
t of p
edes
trian
s and
cyc
lists
;”
Not
ed
Not
ed
Not
ed
Not
ed
Such
a re
fere
nce
coul
d qu
ickly
be
com
e ou
t-of
-dat
e.
Not
ed
Agre
ed. P
lan
will
be
amen
ded
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX1
1 g.
as f
ollo
ws:
g. p
rodu
ce d
esig
ns, i
n ac
cord
ance
w
ith st
anda
rds,
that
mai
ntai
n or
en
hanc
e th
e sa
fety
of t
he h
ighw
ay
netw
ork
ensu
ring
that
all
appr
opria
te
vehi
cle p
arki
ng is
pro
vide
d w
ithin
the
plot
, a p
ropo
rtion
of p
arki
ng is
pr
ovid
ed o
n st
reet
but
is w
ell
desig
ned,
loca
ted
and
inte
grat
ed in
to
the
sche
me
to a
void
obs
truct
ion
to a
ll
79
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Se
ttlem
ent G
aps i
s men
tione
d in
par
t c o
f Pol
icy L
AX11
, not
ing
that
they
ar
e di
spla
yed
on th
e Po
licy
Map
s. Ho
wev
er, t
he P
olicy
Map
s do
not
appe
ar to
disp
lay
any
impo
rtant
settl
emen
t gap
s. It
is th
eref
ore
sugg
este
d th
at th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n sh
ould
eith
er re
mov
e th
is pa
rt of
the
polic
y, or
am
end
the
Polic
y M
ap to
show
settl
emen
t gap
s.
Agre
ed. P
olici
es M
ap to
be
amen
ded
high
way
use
rs a
nd v
isibi
lity
seek
al
way
s to
ensu
re p
erm
eabi
lity
thro
ugh
new
hou
sing
area
s, co
nnec
ting
any
new
dev
elop
men
t int
o th
e he
art o
f th
e ex
istin
g se
ttlem
ent,
prio
ritisi
ng
the
mov
emen
t of p
edes
trian
s and
cy
clist
s; Am
end
Villa
ge C
entre
Inse
t Map
to
iden
tify
Settl
emen
t Gap
s
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il • C
riter
ia a
.: Sug
gest
the
grou
p co
nsid
er re
plac
ing
“whe
re n
eces
sary
” w
ith “o
n sit
es lo
cate
d ou
tsid
e th
e se
ttlem
ent b
ound
ary”
to m
ake
it cle
arer
in w
hich
circ
umst
ance
s thi
s is r
equi
red
• C
riter
ia c
.: With
refe
renc
e to
a re
com
men
datio
n se
t out
in th
e El
mse
tt N
P Ex
amin
ers R
epor
t sug
gest
cha
ngin
g th
e w
ord
“sig
nific
ant”
to
“pos
itive
” • C
riter
ia f.
: Sug
gest
“… c
hara
cter
, sca
le, h
eigh
t, de
nsity
of t
he lo
calit
y;”
Agre
ed
Agre
ed
Agre
ed
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
11 a
. as f
ollo
ws:
a. re
cogn
ise a
nd a
ddre
ss th
e ke
y fe
atur
es, c
hara
cter
istics
, la
ndsc
ape/
build
ing
char
acte
r, lo
cal
dist
inct
iven
ess a
nd sp
ecia
l qua
litie
s of
the
area
and
/or b
uild
ing
as id
entif
ied
in th
e Bu
ilt C
hara
cter
Ass
essm
ent a
nd,
whe
re n
eces
sary
on
sites
loca
ted
outs
ide
the
Settl
emen
t Bou
ndar
y, pr
epar
e a
land
scap
e ch
arac
ter
appr
aisa
l to
dem
onst
rate
this;
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 11
c. a
s fol
low
s: c.
do
not i
nvol
ve th
e lo
ss o
f gar
dens
, im
porta
nt o
pen,
gre
en o
r lan
dsca
ped
area
s or t
he e
rosio
n of
the
settl
emen
t ga
ps id
entif
ied
on th
e Po
licie
s Map
, w
hich
mak
e a
posit
ive
signi
fican
t co
ntrib
utio
n to
the
char
acte
r of t
hat
part
of th
e vi
llage
; Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 11
f. a
s fol
low
s f.
prod
uce
desig
ns th
at re
flect
the
char
acte
r, sc
ale,
hei
ght a
nd d
ensit
y of
th
e lo
calit
y;
80
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n • C
riter
ia i.
: Sub
ject
to th
e vi
ews o
f oth
er c
onsu
ltees
, sug
gest
it re
ads:
“do
not i
ncre
ase
the
risk
of b
oth
fluvi
al a
nd p
luvi
al fl
oodi
ng, o
r the
risk
of
floo
ding
else
whe
re;”
• C
riter
ia j.
: Sub
ject
to th
e vi
ews o
f Cou
nty
colle
ague
s sug
gest
this
may
w
ant t
o re
fer m
ore
spec
ifica
lly to
the
adop
ted
‘Suf
folk
Gui
danc
e fo
r Pa
rkin
g’
Not
ed. S
ugge
sted
am
endm
ents
fro
m S
uffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
are
to
be in
corp
orat
ed in
to P
olicy
LAX
12
.
Not
ed
Non
e N
one
M C
olem
an
To
tally
supp
ort a
nd a
gree
. N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Al
l ess
entia
l are
as c
over
ed
Not
ed
Non
e J R
eeve
Ie. U
nlik
e Pu
mp
Lane
, whe
re d
esig
n co
nsid
erat
ions
hav
e al
read
y be
en
igno
red.
N
oted
N
one
M P
oole
Polic
y 11
par
agra
ph b
, ref
ers t
o th
e un
desir
abili
ty o
f cul
-de-
sac
deve
lopm
ents
. - M
aint
ain
or c
reat
e th
e vi
llage
’s se
nse
of p
lace
and
/or l
ocal
cha
ract
er
avoi
ding
, whe
re p
ossib
le, c
ul-d
e-sa
c de
velo
pmen
ts w
hich
do
not r
efle
ct
the
lane
hie
rarc
hy a
nd fo
rm o
f the
settl
emen
t; I d
o no
t und
erst
and
the
reas
on fo
r thi
s pol
icy st
atem
ent.
I liv
e in
Elm
Lod
ge R
oad,
and
find
it v
ery
adva
ntag
eous
from
a
neig
hbou
rhoo
d w
atch
poi
nt o
f vie
w, a
s it d
iscou
rage
s dan
gero
us
pass
ing
traffi
c, an
d bu
rgla
ry.
Ther
e ar
e m
any
exam
ples
of s
uch
road
s in
Laxf
ield
: Ju
bile
e Cl
ose.
Th
e O
rcha
rds.
Mal
t Clo
se.
Elm
Lod
ge R
oad.
Ho
me
Mea
dow
. Ch
atte
ns L
ane.
N
oyes
ave
nue
at it
s eas
tern
end
.
Not
ed
Amen
d Po
licy
11 b
. as f
ollo
ws:
b. m
aint
ain
or c
reat
e th
e vi
llage
’s se
nse
of p
lace
and
/or l
ocal
cha
ract
er
avoi
ding
, whe
re p
ossib
le, c
ul-d
e-sa
c de
velo
pmen
ts w
hich
do
not r
efle
ct
the
lane
hie
rarc
hy a
nd fo
rm o
f the
se
ttlem
ent;
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
W
ould
like
it to
inclu
de;
If th
ere
is a
spec
ial r
easo
n (i.
e. e
colo
gica
l int
eres
t) w
hy a
gre
en a
rea
coul
d be
enh
ance
d as
a re
sult
of d
evel
opm
ent,
this
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 3
81
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n J A
lchin
Poss
ibly
, or c
ould
the
wor
king
gro
up re
mit
be c
onsid
ered
with
in
anot
her g
roup
? N
oted
N
one
Polic
y LA
X 12
– S
usta
inab
le C
onst
ruct
ion
Prac
tices
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
De
lete
crit
eria
c. a
s it i
s a re
peat
of c
riter
ia a
. and
re-in
dex
acco
rdin
gly.
Agre
ed
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 12
as f
ollo
ws:
Dele
te c
riter
ia c
. and
renu
mbe
r su
bseq
uent
crit
eria
acc
ordi
ngly
M
Col
eman
Som
e of
this
may
hav
e di
fficu
lties
in b
eing
stric
tly a
dher
ed to
at t
he
outs
et.
Not
ed
Non
e
C Em
eny
As
long
as t
he e
xter
nal d
esig
n of
the
build
ing
is in
kee
ping
with
the
char
acte
r of t
he v
illag
e an
d is
not t
he ty
pe o
f woo
den
'bol
t on'
ex
tens
ions
that
seem
to b
e th
e cu
rrent
flav
our o
f the
mon
th w
ith
BMSD
C an
d lo
ok li
ke w
oode
n sh
eds.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Alch
in
It
wou
ld b
e ex
celle
nt to
inco
rpor
ate
sust
aina
ble
prac
tices
. N
oted
N
one
M S
teve
ns
se
e m
y pr
evio
us c
omm
ents
N
oted
N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 4
J Alch
in
Ye
s, de
finite
ly
Not
ed
Non
e Ch
apte
r 9 –
Oth
er C
omm
ents
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
Para
9.2
Ref
eren
ce h
ere
shou
ld b
e to
Map
7 ‘K
ey V
iew
s’ •
Para
9.7
• Pg
38
- 40
• Map
8 •
Polic
ies M
ap •
Land
scap
e As
sess
men
t su
ppor
ting
doc’:
We
note
that
par
a 9.
7 re
fers
to th
e M
arch
201
8 He
ritag
e &
Set
tlem
ent S
ensit
ivity
Ass
essm
ent (
HSSA
) and
that
Map
8
show
s fou
r key
vie
ws w
hich
we
read
as a
re-in
terp
reta
tion
of th
e m
ap
show
n in
the
HSSA
. We
have
also
look
ed a
t the
info
rmat
ion
pres
ente
d in
the
Land
scap
e As
sess
men
t sup
porti
ng d
ocum
ent.
We
mak
e so
me
gene
ral o
bser
vatio
ns h
ere
only
and
leav
e it
the
NP
Grou
p to
impl
emen
t w
hate
ver s
olut
ion
wor
ks b
est a
nd is
mos
t con
siste
nt a
cros
s pla
n an
d su
ppor
ting
docu
men
t:
Not
ed. P
lan
will
be
amen
ded
Agre
ed
Amen
d se
cond
sent
ence
of p
arag
raph
9.
2 as
follo
ws:
A ke
y fe
atur
e of
the
hist
oric
core
(see
M
ap 6
7) i
s tha
t alth
ough
the
patte
rns
is co
nsid
ered
that
of a
line
ar
villa
ge,…
..
82
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n • I
t mig
ht b
e he
lpfu
l to
amen
d th
e en
d of
par
a 9.
7 to
read
as f
ollo
ws:
“...
iden
tifie
s fou
r key
s vie
ws i
n th
e se
ttlem
ent o
f Lax
field
, whi
ch w
e fu
rther
su
mm
arise
as f
ollo
ws:”
• W
e su
gges
t Map
8 (a
nd th
e po
licie
s map
as n
eces
sary
) be
anno
tate
d in
som
e so
that
the
‘Key
Vie
w’ a
rrow
s can
be
cros
s-re
fere
nced
to th
e re
leva
nt d
escr
iptio
ns.
• On
the
first
pag
e of
the
Land
scap
e As
sess
men
t sup
porti
ng d
oc’ t
he
Key
View
des
crip
tions
are
mor
e al
igne
d to
way
they
are
set o
ut in
the
HSSA
, exc
ept t
hat t
he la
st e
ntry
re G
oram
s Mill
Lan
e sh
ould
read
‘3’ a
nd
not ‘
2’
This
is no
t con
sider
ed n
eces
sary
as
to d
o so
wou
ld o
ver-
com
plica
te
the
Plan
. Th
e La
ndsc
ape
Asse
ssm
ent w
ill b
e am
ende
d.
Amen
d fir
st se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph 9
.7
as fo
llow
s: …
……
iden
tifie
s fou
r key
s vie
ws i
n th
e se
ttlem
ent o
f Lax
field
, whi
ch w
e fu
rther
sum
mar
ise a
s fol
low
s: N
one
Amen
d La
ndsc
ape
Asse
ssm
ent
conc
erni
ng re
fere
nce
num
ber f
or
Gora
ms M
ill L
ane.
M S
teve
ns
BE
O 2
-- sh
ould
be
stro
nger
I th
ink
---
will
whe
re p
ossib
le --
- no
t sh
ould
N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
se
e no
tes o
n Q
. 19
abov
e N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
e po
tent
ial t
o m
ake
Laxf
ield
a G
reen
Vill
age
is an
exc
elle
nt p
lan.
W
ith a
n ag
eing
pop
ulat
ion,
mak
ing
Laxf
ield
a d
emen
tia fr
iend
ly v
illag
e w
ould
be
bene
ficia
l.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
Pl
ease
see
our c
omm
ents
in L
AX 1
5 re
'Mob
b's M
eado
w'.
Not
ed
Non
e
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
In p
arag
raph
9.9
, the
follo
win
g am
endm
ents
are
sugg
este
d, to
pro
vide
fu
rther
det
ail:
“S
uffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
’s Hi
stor
ic En
viro
nmen
t Rec
ord
(HER
) pro
vide
s de
tails
of a
rcha
eolo
gica
l and
hist
oric
sites
and
bui
ldin
gs a
nd fi
nds,
and
the
Arch
aeol
ogica
l Ser
vice
shou
ld b
e co
nsul
ted
at th
e ea
rlies
t pos
sible
st
ages
of p
repa
ring
a pl
anni
ng a
pplic
atio
n. T
he p
ublic
ver
sion
of th
e HE
R ca
n be
vie
wed
onl
ine
thro
ugh
the
Suffo
lk H
erita
ge E
xplo
rer.
http
s://h
erita
ge.su
ffolk
.gov
.uk
”
Agre
ed.
Amen
d pa
ragr
aph
9.9
as fo
llow
s: Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil’s
Hist
oric
Envi
ronm
ent R
ecor
d (H
ER) p
rovi
des
deta
ils o
f arc
haeo
logi
cal a
nd h
istor
ic sit
es a
nd b
uild
ings
and
find
s, an
d th
e Ar
chae
olog
ical S
ervi
ce sh
ould
be
cons
ulte
d at
the
earli
est p
ossib
le
stag
es o
f pre
parin
g a
plan
ning
ap
plica
tion.
The
pub
lic v
ersio
n of
the
HER
can
be v
iew
ed o
nlin
e th
roug
h th
e Su
ffolk
Her
itage
Exp
lore
r.
J Tre
adw
ay
6.
Herit
age.
N
oted
N
one
83
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n O
ur G
uild
hall
is a
won
derfu
l ass
et. I
t is G
rade
2* a
nd h
as a
fire
ala
rm
whi
ch w
as c
ut o
ff m
any
year
s ago
due
to it
goi
ng o
ff re
gula
rly a
nd
anno
ying
the
neig
hbou
rs, e
spec
ially
at n
ight
. In
thos
e da
ys th
e se
nsor
s w
ere
pron
e to
be
set o
ff by
spid
ers a
nd in
sect
s. Th
is ha
s lar
gely
bee
n ov
erco
me
by m
oder
n te
chno
logy
. As C
hairm
an o
f the
mus
eum
for
seve
ral y
ears
, I tr
ied
in v
ain
to h
ave
a ne
w fi
t for
pur
pose
syst
em
inst
alle
d. b
ut m
et c
onsid
erab
le h
ostil
ity fr
om th
e tru
st re
spon
sible
for
build
ing.
The
reas
on w
asn’
t jus
t cos
t. It
was
con
sider
ed ‘u
nnec
essa
ry’.
This
was
one
of t
he re
ason
s I re
signe
d. S
o do
we
leav
e th
is hi
stor
ic bu
ildin
g to
cha
nce?
It is
unl
ikel
y to
be
rebu
ilt a
nd w
ith it
wou
ld g
o th
e va
luab
le c
olle
ctio
n in
the
mus
eum
. As a
form
er c
omm
ittee
mem
ber o
f th
e m
useu
m, I
wou
ld d
isput
e th
e ac
tive
inte
rest
of t
he v
illag
e. T
hey
are
glad
it is
ther
e, b
ut la
rgel
y ig
nore
it a
part
from
the
begi
nnin
g an
d en
d of
seas
on m
eetin
gs. A
cces
s is o
bvio
usly
an
issue
that
can
not b
e im
prov
ed d
ue to
its s
tatu
s and
con
stru
ctio
n.
Polic
y LA
X 13
– P
rote
ctio
n of
Lan
dsca
pe S
ettin
g of
Lax
field
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
We
mak
e no
com
men
t on
this
polic
y at
this
time
othe
r tha
n to
not
e th
at
‘det
rimen
tal i
mpa
ct’ c
ould
be
a ve
ry su
bjec
tive
judg
emen
t. N
oted
N
one
D Al
chin
Ther
e is
a ne
ed to
take
acc
ount
of t
he fu
ture
cha
nges
to th
e co
untry
sid
e w
hich
will
be
affe
cted
by
chan
ges t
o ne
w a
gricu
ltura
l pol
icy a
nd b
y th
e ne
ed to
supp
ort s
usta
inab
le e
nerg
y so
lutio
ns.
Not
ed
Non
e
M C
olem
an
So
hop
e th
is ca
n be
ach
ieve
d.
Not
ed
Non
e J A
lchin
It is
esse
ntia
l tha
t you
ng p
eopl
e ar
e in
volv
ed in
futu
re d
evel
opm
ent a
nd
plan
ning
. N
oted
N
one
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
10-3
; 10-
9 W
hilst
man
y fie
lds h
ave
been
enl
arge
d to
ena
ble
larg
e m
achi
nery
, thi
s ha
s cau
sed
loss
of h
edge
row
and
tree
s, lo
ss o
f wild
life,
ero
sion
of so
il an
d th
e bu
ild u
p of
snow
in w
inte
r whi
ch c
an b
e bl
own
on to
road
s.
Whi
le it
is n
ice to
hav
e op
en v
iew
s, do
es th
is re
ally
mea
n a
lack
of
hedg
es a
nd tr
ees?
Not
ed
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
Pl
ease
see
com
men
ts in
LAX
15
re 'M
obb'
s Mea
dow
'. N
oted
N
one
Polic
y LA
X 14
- Bi
odiv
ersi
ty
84
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
Po
licy
LAX1
4, a
nd su
ppor
ting
refe
renc
es to
bio
dive
rsity
thro
ugho
ut th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n, a
re w
ell w
ritte
n an
d de
taile
d an
d is
supp
orte
d by
SC
C as
par
t of o
ngoi
ng w
ork
tow
ards
the
Gree
nest
Cou
nty
Initi
ativ
e6
In re
gard
to th
e ph
otog
raph
of “
an e
xam
ple
of e
co-fr
iend
ly h
ouse
” (p
47),
it m
ay b
e he
lpfu
l to
add
in a
des
crip
tion
as to
wha
t mak
es th
is ho
use
“eco
-frie
ndly
”.
Not
ed
Non
e
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il Th
e ‘g
reen
vill
age’
am
bitio
ns w
ithin
the
plan
are
cle
ar. D
id th
e gr
oup
cons
ider
whe
ther
a re
quire
men
t for
new
dev
elop
men
t pro
posa
ls to
also
in
clude
Sw
ift b
ricks
and
/or b
at b
oxes
(for
exa
mpl
e) a
s a fu
rther
mea
ns
of p
rovi
ding
net
bio
dive
rsity
gai
n?
Para
10.
14 A
not
e on
ly to
dra
w a
ttent
ion
to th
e fa
ct th
at th
e em
ergi
ng
JLP
also
iden
tifie
s the
allo
tmen
ts a
long
Sta
tion
Road
as a
n im
porta
nt
open
spac
e.
Not
ed
Non
e at
this
stag
e.
To c
onsid
er a
dditi
onal
bio
dive
rsity
ga
in re
quire
men
ts a
t nex
t Pla
n re
visio
n
M C
olem
an
To
tal a
gree
men
t N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
e M
useu
m is
an
exce
llent
reso
urce
. N
oted
N
one
Anon
ymou
s
But t
here
is n
o po
int l
eavi
ng a
n ol
d es
tabl
ished
hed
ge w
ith n
o ac
cess
to
ditc
h or
hed
ge fo
r mai
nten
ance
. N
oted
N
one
Polic
y L
AX 1
5 –
Loca
l Gre
en S
pace
s
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
It w
ould
app
ear t
hat t
he L
ocal
Gre
en S
pace
App
raisa
l ref
erre
d to
in p
ara
10.1
7 w
as n
ot a
vaila
ble
durin
g th
is co
nsul
tatio
n pe
riod,
whi
ch is
un
fortu
nate
. Tha
t sai
d, w
e no
te th
at tw
o of
the
six d
esig
natio
ns (t
he tw
o al
lotm
ent s
ites)
are
also
iden
tifie
d in
the
emer
ging
JLP.
With
rega
rds t
o ‘M
obbs
Mea
dow
’ and
the
‘Fie
ld b
ehin
d Ch
urch
Wal
k’ w
e ha
ve n
o sp
ecifi
c co
ncer
ns a
t thi
s tim
e.
Para
11.
2 Su
gges
t inc
ludi
ng a
n “(a
t mon
th /
year
)” af
ter t
he w
ord
‘curre
ntly
’ in
the
first
sent
ence
to p
rovi
de so
me
time
cont
ext f
or fu
ture
re
fere
nce.
11
.10
to 1
1.12
A th
ough
t. Co
uld
thes
e be
com
bine
d as
one
, with
pub
de
tails
pre
sent
ed a
s bul
let p
oint
s und
er 1
1.10
? Th
is w
ould
also
requ
ire
cons
eque
ntia
l par
a’ re
-num
berin
g. P
ara
11.1
5 M
ay w
ant t
o ad
d a
cros
s-re
f’ to
thei
r allo
catio
ns v
ia L
AX 1
5.
Not
ed
Agre
ed
Not
ed
Loca
l Gre
en S
pace
App
raisa
l to
be
publ
ished
N
one
at th
is st
age
To b
e co
nsid
ered
at n
ext P
lan
revi
sion
85
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n D
Alch
in
Su
ppor
t the
pol
icy b
ut it
is im
porta
nt th
at th
e ow
ners
of p
rivat
e la
nd a
re
carri
ed a
long
with
the
desig
natio
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
M C
olem
an
W
e m
ust b
e st
rict w
ith u
tility
wor
ks o
n ve
rges
, etc
. in
that
they
mus
t be
mad
e go
od a
s soo
n as
pos
sible
. N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
As
sets
shou
ld b
e m
aint
aine
d an
d de
velo
ped
Not
ed
Non
e C
Win
gate
For c
larit
y, po
int 5
shou
ld b
e re
nam
ed F
ield
on
left
of G
oram
Mill
Lan
e
Agre
ed
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
15 a
s fol
low
s:
5. F
ield
beh
ind
Chur
ch W
alk
on le
ft of
Go
ram
Mill
Lan
e
J Wor
thin
gton
shou
ld w
e de
fine
wha
t we
mea
n by
gre
en sp
aces
. Can
they
be
urba
n,
hard
surfa
ces w
ith tr
ee c
over
and
pla
ntin
g or
nat
ural
, allo
tmen
ts o
r co
mm
unity
orc
hard
or b
uria
l gro
und
How
do
we
defin
e co
mm
on la
nds,
eg M
arke
t Squ
are,
Mid
dy L
ine
a ta
nk
pool
. Priv
ate
land
giv
en p
erm
issiv
e ac
cess
. Mea
dow
beh
ind
Low
Hou
se
Allo
tmen
t lan
d - C
hich
en h
ut tr
iang
le
The
NPP
F de
fines
wha
t qua
lify
as
Loca
l Gre
en S
pace
s. N
one
E &
D M
erce
r
Whi
lst w
e ha
ve a
nsw
ered
yes
, we
are
conc
erne
d th
at th
e w
ordi
ng o
f thi
s po
licy
'ope
ns th
e do
or' f
or p
oten
tial f
utur
e de
velo
pmen
t. Th
ese
gree
n sp
aces
def
ine
the
villa
ge a
s it s
tand
s and
shou
ld b
e pr
otec
ted
all c
osts
.
The
polic
y do
es n
ot a
llow
any
de
velo
pmen
t on
the
iden
tifie
d gr
een
spac
es, e
xcep
t in
exce
ptio
nal c
ircum
stan
ces.
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
W
e w
ish to
offi
cially
log
our c
ompl
aint
abo
ut th
is se
ctio
n of
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan.
W
e ar
e in
cred
ibly
disa
ppoi
nted
that
our
site
at B
icker
s Hill
, ref
erre
d to
in
the
repo
rt as
'Mob
bs M
eado
w',
has b
een
desig
nate
d as
a g
reen
ope
n sp
ace
and
ther
efor
e no
t a p
riorit
y fo
r dev
elop
men
t. W
e pu
t thi
s site
forw
ard
for d
evel
opm
ent c
onsid
erat
ion
in S
epte
mbe
r 20
18 a
nd a
re su
rpris
ed a
nd v
ery
disa
ppoi
nted
that
ther
e ha
s bee
n no
co
nsul
tatio
n w
ith u
s or f
ollo
w u
p by
the
Paris
h pr
ior t
o th
em c
omin
g to
th
eir d
ecisi
on. I
t is u
nacc
epta
ble
that
a d
ecisi
on a
bout
the
futu
re o
f our
la
nd c
an b
e m
ade
with
out o
ur c
onse
nt a
nd w
ithou
t any
con
sulta
tion
with
us.
We
only
foun
d ou
t abo
ut th
is op
portu
nity
to c
omm
ent o
n th
e dr
aft p
lan
by c
hanc
e. W
e sh
ould
hav
e be
en in
form
ed a
nd k
ept u
pdat
ed
thro
ugho
ut th
e pr
oces
s esp
ecia
lly w
e ha
d su
bmitt
ed o
ur si
te fo
r
Not
ed
Not
ed
The
prep
arat
ion
of th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ha
s gon
e be
yond
the
min
imum
re
quire
men
ts se
t out
by
the
Gove
rnm
ent R
egul
atio
ns.
The
pre-
subm
issio
n co
nsul
tatio
n on
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
has
prov
ided
the
form
al c
onsu
ltatio
n op
portu
nity
to m
ake
Non
e
86
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n co
nsid
erat
ion.
As o
wne
rs o
f the
mea
dow
we
stro
ngly
feel
that
we
shou
ld h
ave
repr
esen
tatio
n in
the
decis
ion
mak
ing
proc
ess.
We
unde
rsta
nd fr
om th
e re
port
that
the
villa
ge fe
els s
trong
ly th
at th
e vi
ew o
f our
mea
dow
from
the
High
Stre
et is
impo
rtant
. The
pla
nnin
g ap
plica
tion
whi
ch is
cur
rent
ly p
endi
ng fo
r onl
y th
ree
prop
ertie
s wou
ld
not h
ave
any
impa
ct o
n th
at v
iew
at a
ll. W
e pu
rpos
eful
ly p
ositi
oned
the
prop
osed
pro
perti
es a
long
the
boun
dary
adj
oini
ng B
icker
s Hill
and
th
eref
ore
they
are
not
, by
desig
n, v
isibl
e fro
m th
e Hi
gh S
treet
. In
addi
tion,
the
hedg
ing
alon
gsid
e Bi
cker
s Hill
wou
ld b
e m
aint
aine
d an
d th
eref
ore
once
aga
in m
inim
ise a
ny im
pact
. Yo
u w
ill b
e aw
are
that
we
have
und
erta
ken
num
erou
s eco
logi
cal s
urve
ys
on th
is sit
e. T
he la
test
subm
issio
n re
cogn
ises t
hat t
he sp
ecie
s div
ersit
y on
the
site
as b
eing
in d
eclin
e. H
owev
er if
pla
nnin
g is
gran
ted
on th
e sm
all s
ectio
n, th
e m
easu
res r
epor
ted
will
ben
efit
the
rem
aind
er o
f the
m
eado
w.
We
wou
ld li
ke to
add
that
the
mea
dow
has
bee
n in
our
fam
ily fo
r in
exce
ss o
f 100
yea
rs a
nd w
e ha
ve n
o in
tent
ions
of s
ellin
g th
e sit
e. A
ny
build
ing
wor
k w
ould
not
be
pass
ed o
n to
dev
elop
ers b
ut in
stea
d w
ould
be
pro
vidin
g lo
cal w
ork
for l
ocal
peo
ple.
repr
esen
tatio
ns a
bout
the
land
in
ques
tion.
N
oted
. N
oted
. La
nd o
wne
rshi
p is
not a
mat
ter
that
can
be
take
n in
to a
ccou
nt in
se
tting
pla
nnin
g po
licie
s.
L Pi
ckle
s
Deve
lopm
ent e
ven
with
VER
Y SP
ECIA
L CI
RCUM
STAN
CES
shou
ld n
ot g
o ah
ead
on th
e 6
loca
l gre
en sp
aces
stat
ed.
The
polic
y, as
writ
ten,
con
form
s w
ith th
e N
atio
nal P
lann
ing
Polic
y N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 5
C
Emen
y
Defin
itely
! som
e fo
otpa
ths a
ppea
r to
have
bee
n lo
st p
erha
ps d
ue to
re
duce
d us
e an
d m
issin
g F.P
. sig
ns.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Alch
in
Fo
ot a
nd c
ycle
pat
hs n
eed
to b
e cle
arly
sign
post
ed.
Not
ed
Non
e J W
orth
ingt
on
M
erge
CA5
and
6
Not
ed
Non
e Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
6 J A
lchin
I am
uns
ure
how
man
y w
orki
ng g
roup
s wou
ld b
e vi
able
. N
oted
N
one
87
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
7 J W
orth
ingt
on
Co
nsol
idat
e CA
's 5
-9
Not
ed
Non
e An
onym
ous
A
wor
king
par
ty w
ould
be
a gr
eat i
dea
as w
e kn
ow w
e ha
ve a
pric
eles
s ar
ea fo
r all
to e
njoy
, and
with
a fe
w sm
all a
djus
tmen
ts it
cou
ld b
e m
ore
com
forta
ble
for f
amili
es in
the
play
are
a, su
ch a
s som
e sh
aded
are
as
Ther
e is
no d
oubt
that
at t
his p
rese
nt ti
me
it is
unde
r use
d, b
ut it
was
an
d sh
ould
be
utili
sed
for d
iffer
ing
type
s of s
port.
We
have
had
or
char
ds in
the
villa
ge a
lso a
llotm
ents
and
we
all k
now
if y
ou w
ant t
o gr
ow it
ent
ails
the
rest
rictio
n of
wild
life
.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 8
J Alch
in
Co
uld
thes
e gr
oups
be
amal
gam
ated
? N
oted
N
one
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
The
Coun
ty C
ounc
il is
supp
ortiv
e of
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 8
and
Obj
ectiv
e N
EO-5
, to
mak
e La
xfie
ld a
Gre
en V
illag
e.
Activ
e Tr
avel
Th
e vi
sion
for t
he re
siden
ts o
f the
par
ish to
lead
act
ive
and
heal
thy
lives
, an
d th
e m
entio
n of
act
ive
trave
l in
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 8
is w
elco
med
. Ph
ysica
l act
ivity
, suc
h as
wal
king
and
cyc
ling,
has
not
onl
y th
e ob
viou
s im
prov
emen
ts to
phy
sical
hea
lth, b
ut a
lso c
an h
elp
to im
prov
e m
enta
l he
alth
and
wel
lbei
ng, a
s men
tione
d in
par
agra
ph 8
.3, w
hich
is w
elco
me.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 9
J Alch
in
W
ithin
one
gro
up, p
ossib
ly?
Not
ed
Non
e S
Pren
derg
ast
N
ot su
re a
bout
this.
.. wha
t abo
ut w
ild fl
ower
ver
ges a
nd e
dges
of f
ield
s, ra
ther
than
the
loss
of a
rabl
e la
nd?
Not
ed
Non
e
S He
pwor
th
Ad
d: T
his s
houl
d in
clude
letti
ng th
e bo
ttom
third
of t
he C
hurc
hyar
d re
vert
to w
ildflo
wer
mea
dow
as i
t for
mal
ly w
as (1
8 ye
ars a
go) a
s the
re
are
hard
ly a
ny g
rave
ston
es th
ere
and
it w
ould
enh
ance
the
prot
ecte
d ar
ea a
bove
the
brid
ge.
Not
ed
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
Wou
ld th
at m
ean
with
acc
ess t
o th
e pu
blic.
N
oted
N
one
at th
is st
age.
Fo
r disc
ussio
n at
nex
t Pla
n re
visio
n Ch
apte
r 10
– O
ther
Com
men
ts
M C
olem
an
Ho
pe v
illag
ers w
ill c
ome
forw
ard
to jo
in th
e w
orki
ng p
artie
s (gr
oups
). N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
se
e no
tes Q
. 25
Not
ed
Non
e
88
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n J A
lchin
At le
ast o
ne w
orki
ng p
arty
wou
ld b
e be
nefic
ial.
Not
ed
Non
e C
Caw
ood
N
EO-5
I'm
par
ticul
arly
kee
n on
this
obje
ctiv
e.
Not
ed
Non
e S
Pren
derg
ast
10
-8
Ther
e is
no o
utdo
or sp
ace
for t
he re
siden
ts o
f Har
tism
ere
Hou
se, a
part
from
a b
ench
in th
e ca
r par
k. T
here
is a
smal
l gre
en sp
ace
betw
een
the
row
s of t
he b
unga
low
s whi
ch c
ould
be
a de
signa
ted
plac
e fo
r a g
arde
n,
pond
and
a p
lace
for r
efle
ctio
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
10
.16
- Due
to th
e un
just
and
unt
rue
com
plai
nts l
ogge
d ag
ains
t our
cu
rrent
pla
nnin
g ap
plica
tion
we
feel
that
our
des
igna
tion
as a
LGS
has
be
en d
one
to b
lock
dev
elop
men
t on
our m
eado
w.
We
wer
e pa
rticu
larly
surp
rised
to se
e a
rece
nt c
ompl
aint
quo
ting
this
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
as o
ne o
f the
reas
ons f
or re
ject
ion,
whe
n th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n is
still
in a
dra
ft fo
rmat
. Sur
ely
this
docu
men
t ca
nnot
be
quot
ed u
ntil
the
proc
ess h
as b
een
com
plet
ed a
nd it
is a
n ap
prov
ed N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n.
The
draf
t Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
that
we
cons
ulte
d on
onl
y ca
rries
lim
ited
wei
ght i
n th
e pl
anni
ng
decis
ion
mak
ing
proc
ess.
The
amou
nt o
f wei
ght t
o be
affo
rded
to
the
Plan
will
incr
ease
as i
t goe
s fo
rwar
d to
refe
rend
um.
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 16
– P
rote
ctin
g Ex
istin
g Se
rvic
es a
nd F
acili
ties
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
Acce
ss to
Gre
ensp
aces
and
Com
mun
ity F
acili
ties
The
impo
rtanc
e of
pro
tect
ing
exist
ing
facil
ities
is h
ighl
ight
ed in
Pol
icy
LAX1
6, a
nd is
wel
com
ed b
y SC
C. T
hese
facil
ities
can
hel
p to
pro
mot
e so
cial i
nclu
sion,
and
the
feel
ing
of c
omm
unity
spiri
t and
con
nect
ivity
, w
hich
has
ben
efits
to m
enta
l wel
lbei
ng. A
cces
s to
plea
sant
and
at
tract
ive
outd
oor s
pace
s also
hel
p to
con
tribu
te to
phy
sical
hea
lth a
nd
wel
lbei
ng, w
ith in
crea
sed
phys
ical a
ctiv
ity a
t rec
reat
iona
l fac
ilitie
s, as
w
ell a
s lin
ks to
impr
oved
men
tal h
ealth
ht
tps:/
/ww
w.n
cbi.n
lm.n
ih.g
ov/p
mc/
artic
les/
PMC5
6630
18/ .
Not
ed
Non
e
La
xfie
ld &
Di
stric
t Mus
eum
Co
nsid
er G
uild
hall
as c
omm
unity
ass
et: B
uild
ing
and
site
P11
Don’
t tak
e w
hat w
e ha
ve fo
r gra
nted
. Suc
cess
requ
ires e
nerg
y an
d co
mm
itmen
t of v
olun
teer
s (M
useu
m) a
nd lo
cal s
ourc
ing
(food
and
se
rvice
s) •
Com
mun
ity re
cogn
ition
of n
eed
for l
ong
term
con
serv
atio
n an
d m
aint
enan
ce p
lan
P11
BEI-2
: The
Gui
ldha
ll is
a m
edie
val b
uild
ing
and
requ
ires i
nves
tmen
t to
pres
erve
the
fabr
ic of
the
build
ing,
impr
ove
acce
ss a
nd d
evel
op it
s use
as
a v
illag
e as
set.
P13
Not
ed
Non
e at
this
stag
e.
Any
chan
ges o
r pro
posa
ls pu
t for
war
d to
ext
end
the
use
of th
e Gu
ildha
ll, or
to
seek
fund
ing
for a
ny p
urpo
se,
wou
ld in
volv
e th
e M
useu
m T
rust
ees.
Th
ere
is no
inte
nt to
impo
se a
ny
chan
ges o
r req
uire
men
ts, o
nly
to
supp
ort t
he v
alua
ble
wor
k th
at is
al
read
y be
ing
done
.
89
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Se
ekin
g cla
rifica
tion
– do
es th
is m
ean
othe
r use
rs in
the
Paris
h Ro
om?
Or m
ore
open
ing
hour
s for
the
Mus
eum
as A
S1-5
bel
ow?
Or b
oth?
AS
I-5: T
here
is a
gre
at d
eman
d fo
r inc
reas
ed a
cces
s to
the
Mus
eum
and
fo
r mor
e ev
ents
to b
e st
aged
by
the
Mus
eum
.P14
Ag
ain,
poi
nt o
f cla
rifica
tion:
doe
s thi
s mea
n in
crea
sed
hour
s of o
peni
ng?
Or i
ncre
ased
acc
essib
ility
for p
eopl
e w
ith re
stric
ted
mob
ility
?
We
are
resp
ondi
ng to
the
requ
est f
or m
ore
hour
s by
incr
easin
g M
arke
t Da
y op
enin
g ho
urs f
rom
11a
m –
5pm
. Also
, we
do h
ost a
num
ber o
f gr
oup
visit
s whe
n re
ques
ted
by h
istor
y gr
oups
or v
isitin
g fa
mili
es. A
ny
grou
p in
Lax
field
and
surro
undi
ng a
reas
is w
elco
me
to re
ques
t the
sa
me.
W
e ar
e op
enin
g fo
r the
Eas
ter W
eeke
nd 2
020
in a
dditi
on to
our
usu
al
open
ing
from
May
to S
epte
mbe
r. As
the
Plan
poi
nts o
ut th
e M
useu
m e
xists
and
runs
on
the
volu
ntar
y tim
e, in
tere
st a
nd d
edica
tion
of a
com
para
tivel
y fe
w p
eopl
e in
term
s of
its m
anag
emen
t and
stew
ards
. The
re is
a li
mit
to w
hich
this
can
be
stre
tche
d.
Limite
d m
obili
ty is
sues
bei
ng p
artia
lly a
ddre
ssed
by
new
dow
nsta
irs
galle
ry in
our
old
offi
ce sp
ace.
Sta
ged
even
ts o
utsid
e w
ill b
e th
ree
this
year
to c
eleb
rate
our
50th
ann
iver
sary
and
the
guild
hall’s
500
th. T
he 2
us
ual e
vent
s in
the
villa
ge h
all p
lus a
cel
ebra
tion
on C
hurc
h Pl
ain
on
20th
June
. BE
I-2: T
he G
uild
hall
is a
med
ieva
l bui
ldin
g an
d re
quire
s inv
estm
ent t
o pr
eser
ve th
e fa
bric
of th
e bu
ildin
g, im
prov
e ac
cess
and
dev
elop
its u
se
as a
vill
age
asse
t. P3
6 9.
11 T
he G
rade
2* l
isted
Gui
ldha
ll is
one
of L
axfie
ld’s
key
build
ings
and
is
muc
h va
lued
by
resid
ents
. It c
urre
ntly
hou
ses t
he M
useu
m o
n th
e fir
st
floor
, and
the
Paris
h Ro
oms o
n th
e gr
ound
floo
r as w
ell a
s oth
er a
reas
w
hich
are
let t
o te
nant
s for
stor
age.
It n
eeds
inve
stm
ent i
n sig
nific
ant
repa
ir an
d m
aint
enan
ce w
ork
to p
rese
rve
it fo
r the
long
term
; wor
k al
so
need
s to
be d
one
to se
e w
heth
er it
is p
ossib
le to
ena
ble
it to
bec
ome
finan
cially
sust
aina
ble
and
to su
ppor
t mor
e ex
tens
ive
use
of th
is co
mm
unity
ass
et. P
43
The
mus
eum
has
take
n on
the
old
surg
ery
room
s. Th
is is
to b
e ad
min
an
d pl
ace
whe
re w
e ca
n sh
ow d
ocum
ents
on
requ
est.
Ther
e is
only
one
Pa
rish
Room
and
one
room
let f
or st
orag
e.
Agai
n, se
ekin
g cla
rifica
tion
of fi
nanc
ially
via
ble
give
n ou
r lim
ited
fund
s an
d sc
ope
for m
ore.
We
reco
gnise
and
supp
ort t
he a
ctio
ns
alre
ady
bein
g ta
ken
as se
t out
in th
e co
mm
ents
mad
e.
90
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n An
d m
ore
exte
nsiv
e us
e?
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 2
Esta
blish
a W
orki
ng G
roup
to w
ork
with
the
Trus
tees
of t
he G
uild
hall
to d
evel
op a
bus
ines
s cas
e fo
r inv
estm
ent i
n th
is hi
stor
ic bu
ildin
g to
pre
serv
e an
d im
prov
e its
usa
bilit
y P4
3 W
e ar
e as
sum
ing
the
busin
ess c
ase
is fo
r the
pur
pose
of s
eeki
ng
fund
ing
for t
he fa
bric
of th
e bu
ildin
g?
11.9
The
Mus
eum
is h
ouse
d in
the
16th
Cen
tury
Gui
ldha
ll in
the
cent
re
of th
e vil
lage
and
hol
ds a
n ex
tens
ive
villa
ge a
rchi
ve, c
ompr
ising
of
phot
os, d
ocum
ents
and
arte
fact
s. It
is op
en re
gula
rly, f
or li
mite
d pe
riods
be
twee
n Ap
ril a
nd O
ctob
er. A
cces
s is l
imite
d as
it is
on
the
first
floo
r of
a Gr
ade
2 lis
ted
build
ing
and
open
ing
hour
s are
lim
ited.
The
re a
re li
nks
with
the
scho
ol, H
artis
mer
e Ho
use
and
the
com
mun
ity in
gen
eral
via
sp
ecifi
c ou
treac
h pa
ckag
es fo
r edu
catio
n, th
erap
y an
d re
sear
ch. T
he
villa
ge is
pro
ud o
f its
mus
eum
; whe
n as
ked
wha
t the
y va
lued
mos
t ab
out t
he v
illag
e, o
ver 5
0% o
f hou
seho
ld su
rvey
resp
onde
nts s
aid
they
va
lued
the
Guild
hall
and
over
70%
said
‘vill
age
hist
ory/
built
her
itage
’.
ASI-5
: Lax
field
Mus
eum
. The
re is
a g
reat
dem
and
for i
ncre
ased
acc
ess t
o th
e M
useu
m a
nd fo
r mor
e ev
ents
to b
e st
aged
by
the
Mus
eum
. Co
ncer
ns re
gard
ing
the
fabr
ic of
the
build
ing
and
unus
ed sp
ace
with
in
the
Guild
hall
in g
ener
al w
ere
also
raise
d in
the
Surv
ey P
55
As st
ated
abo
ve –
we
are
atte
mpt
ing
to a
ddre
ss th
e op
enin
g ho
urs a
nd
mob
ility
issu
es. T
here
is n
o un
used
spac
e at
pre
sent
. AS
O-2
: Inc
reas
e ac
cess
to th
e m
ater
ial u
sed
and
cura
ted
by th
e M
useu
m P
56
Polic
y LA
X 16
- Pr
otec
ting
exist
ing
serv
ices a
nd fa
ciliti
es P
ropo
sals
that
w
ould
resu
lt in
the
loss
of v
alue
d fa
ciliti
es o
r ser
vice
s whi
ch su
ppor
t a
loca
l com
mun
ity (o
r pre
mise
s las
t use
d fo
r suc
h pu
rpos
es) w
ill o
nly
be
perm
itted
whe
re: a
. it c
an b
e de
mon
stra
ted
that
the
curre
nt u
se is
not
ec
onom
ically
via
ble
nor l
ikel
y to
bec
ome
viab
le. W
here
app
ropr
iate
, su
ppor
ting
finan
cial e
vide
nce
shou
ld b
e pr
ovid
ed in
cludi
ng a
ny e
fforts
to
adv
ertis
e th
e pr
emise
s for
sale
for a
min
imum
of 1
2 m
onth
s; an
d b.
it
can
be d
emon
stra
ted,
thro
ugh
evid
ence
d re
sear
ch, t
hat t
here
is n
o lo
cal
dem
and
for t
he u
se a
nd th
at th
e bu
ildin
g/sit
e is
not n
eede
d fo
r any
al
tern
ativ
e so
cial,
com
mun
ity o
r lei
sure
use
; or c
. alte
rnat
ive
facil
ities
an
d se
rvice
s are
ava
ilabl
e, o
r rep
lace
men
t pro
visio
n is
mad
e, o
f at l
east
eq
uiva
lent
stan
dard
, in
a lo
catio
n th
at is
acc
essib
le to
the
com
mun
ity it
se
rves
with
goo
d ac
cess
by
publ
ic tra
nspo
rt or
by
cycli
ng o
r wal
king
. P5
6
91
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Th
e m
useu
m h
as c
once
rns a
bout
eco
nom
ically
via
ble
for t
he re
ason
s st
ated
bef
ore.
Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
14 W
ork
with
the
Mus
eum
Tru
stee
s to
expl
ore
way
s of
ext
endi
ng u
se o
f thi
s val
uabl
e as
set.
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 15
Dev
elop
a
Paris
h In
frast
ruct
ure
Inve
stm
ent P
lan
to p
rovi
de a
cle
ar p
ictur
e of
La
xfie
ld’s
curre
nt a
nd p
oten
tial a
sset
s and
ens
ure
that
app
ropr
iate
fu
ndin
g ca
n be
pro
vide
d (a
nd w
here
nec
essa
ry a
dditi
onal
fund
ing
soug
ht) t
o m
aint
ain
and
deve
lop
thos
e as
sets
app
ropr
iate
ly. P
58
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il W
e m
ake
no c
omm
ent o
n th
is po
licy
at th
is tim
e.
Not
ed
Non
e
M C
olem
an
W
e m
ust p
rote
ct e
xistin
g se
rvice
s etc
. but
at t
he m
omen
t tra
nspo
rt is
alm
ost n
on-e
xiste
nt.
Not
ed
Non
e
J Alch
in
Se
rvice
s and
facil
ities
requ
ire p
rote
ctio
n to
enh
ance
the
villa
ge's
futu
re.
Not
ed
Non
e Po
licy
LAX
17 –
Ope
n Sp
ace,
Spo
rt a
nd R
ecre
atio
n Fa
cilit
ies
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il W
e m
ake
no c
omm
ent o
n th
is po
licy
at th
is tim
e.
Not
ed
Non
e
M C
olem
an
Be
tter u
se o
f fac
ilitie
s and
mod
erni
satio
n to
brin
g th
ings
up-
to-d
ate
and
safe
. N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Es
sent
ial a
long
side
furth
er d
evel
opm
ent
Not
ed
Non
e M
Poo
le
Pa
ragr
aph
11:1
3 st
ates
: Th
e pa
vilio
n is
used
by
The
Horti
cultu
ral S
ocie
ty a
long
side
its g
ener
al
use.
Th
e pa
vilio
n is
now
ver
y se
ldom
use
d by
the
Horti
cultu
ral S
ocie
ty.
The
villa
ge h
all i
s use
d fo
r the
socie
ty’s
annu
al su
mm
er sh
ow a
nd
occa
siona
lly a
lso th
e Ba
ptist
cha
pel h
all,
for o
ccas
ions
whe
n th
ere
is an
ove
rspi
ll of
exh
ibits
.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 10
M
Col
eman
Long
ove
rdue
. N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
is m
ay a
lread
y ha
ppen
? N
oted
N
one
J Wor
thin
gton
Spec
ial e
mph
asis
on d
esig
ning
for s
hare
d an
d ex
tend
ed u
se
Not
ed
Non
e Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
11
J Alch
in
St
rong
ly su
ppor
ted.
N
oted
N
one
92
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n G
Ayre
I hav
e re
serv
atio
ns a
bout
com
mun
ity g
arde
ns a
nd o
utdo
or g
ym
beca
use
of p
ast h
istor
y of
van
dalis
m o
f chi
ldre
n's p
lay
area
and
bot
tle
bank
whe
n it
was
site
d th
ere.
(how
will
it b
e fu
nded
?)
Not
ed
Non
e
R Ho
lland
I do
not s
uppo
rt th
e id
ea o
f a c
omm
unity
gar
den
as th
ere
are
alre
ady
allo
tmen
ts w
hich
app
ear n
egle
cted
/not
look
ed a
fter a
nd I
fear
the
sam
e w
ould
hap
pen
with
this
idea
. Ho
wev
er, I
do
supp
ort t
he o
ther
su
gges
tions
of o
utdo
or e
quip
men
t and
an
may
be a
n or
char
d.
Not
ed
Non
e
Anon
ymou
s
Agre
e w
ith g
ym e
quip
men
t and
any
spor
t fac
ility
but
not
a g
arde
n or
an
orch
ard.
N
oted
N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 12
J A
lchin
As p
revi
ously
refe
rred
to -
bene
ficia
l with
age
ing
popu
latio
n.
Not
ed
Non
e Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
13
J Alch
in
En
gage
men
t of y
oung
peo
ple
- ess
entia
l. N
oted
N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 14
N
o co
mm
ents
rece
ived
Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
15
J Wor
thin
gton
Stre
ss th
is as
a st
rate
gic
tool
the
PC h
as to
coo
rdin
ate
com
mun
ity
initi
ativ
es, w
ider
fund
ing
sour
ces a
nd li
nks w
ith e
xter
nal a
genc
ies a
nd
publ
ic se
rvice
s.
Not
ed
Non
e
Chap
ter 1
1 –
Oth
er C
omm
ents
S
Jack
11.1
: The
re is
no
Disp
ensin
g Ph
arm
acy
at H
artis
mer
e Ho
use.
Som
eone
dr
oppi
ng o
ff an
d gi
ving
out
med
icatio
ns d
oes n
ot a
Disp
ensin
g Ph
arm
acy
mak
e!
11.4
: The
Chu
rch
is pa
rt of
the
Four
Riv
ers B
enef
ice, n
ot L
axfie
ld a
nd
Wor
lingw
orth
. 11
.6: S
ee a
bove
for D
ispen
sing
Phar
mac
y co
mm
ents
.
Agre
ed.
Agre
ed.
Amen
d fif
th b
ulle
t poi
nt o
f par
agra
ph
11.1
as f
ollo
ws:
Shel
tere
d, R
etire
men
t and
Sup
porte
d Liv
ing
Acco
mm
odat
ion
with
a
Disp
ensin
g Ph
arm
acy
Amen
d fir
st se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph
11.4
as f
ollo
ws:
11.4
All
Sain
ts C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Ch
urch
is p
art o
f the
Fou
r Riv
ers
Laxf
ield
and
Wor
lingw
orth
Ben
efice
.
93
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n
Agre
ed
Amen
d th
ird se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph
11.6
as f
ollo
ws:
This
is al
so th
e sit
e fo
r a d
ispen
sing
phar
mac
y av
aila
ble
to v
illag
e re
siden
ts a
s wel
l as H
arte
smer
e Ho
use
resid
ents
; it i
s also
the
loca
tion
for t
he
visit
ing
Mob
ile L
ibra
ry.
C Em
eny
Fu
lly su
ppor
t it.
Not
e 11
:13
the
Play
ing
field
is n
ot u
sed
by th
e Ho
rticu
ltura
l Soc
iety
, pag
e 55
. Ag
reed
Am
end
final
sent
ence
of p
arag
raph
11
.13
as fo
llow
s: Th
e pa
vilio
n is
used
by
the
Horti
cultu
ral S
ocie
ty a
long
side
its
gene
ral u
se.
J Alch
in
Gr
oups
cou
ld b
e am
alga
mat
ed.
Not
ed
Non
e J T
read
way
5.Lo
cal S
ervi
ces
Whe
n th
e de
velo
pers
of t
he fo
ur n
ew h
ousin
g es
tate
s in
Fram
lingh
am
got u
nder
way
ther
e w
as n
o co
ncer
n fo
r the
affe
ct o
n th
e do
ctor
’s su
rger
y or
the
scho
ols o
r any
oth
er a
spec
t of t
he to
wn’
s inf
rast
ruct
ure.
Th
ere
is a
stra
in o
n th
ese
reso
urce
s and
whi
lst F
ram
Sur
gery
seem
s to
be ‘a
bout
man
agin
g’ th
is is
not t
he c
ase
in H
ales
wor
th, w
hich
has
an
extre
me
shor
tage
of G
P’s a
nd w
aits
can
be
ther
e w
eeks
. I c
anno
t co
mm
ent o
n th
e Fr
essin
gfie
ld /
Stra
dbro
ke su
rger
ies.
Deve
lopm
ent o
n ou
r vill
age
will
hav
e an
effe
ct o
n th
is to
o.
Not
ed
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 18
– N
ew B
usin
esse
s and
Em
ploy
men
t
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
N
ew B
usin
esse
s and
Em
ploy
men
t Th
e op
enin
g st
atem
ent o
f thi
s Pol
icy st
ates
that
inte
nsifi
catio
n or
re
tent
ion
of e
mpl
oym
ent p
rem
ises s
houl
d be
supp
orte
d un
less
it h
as
“una
ccep
tabl
e im
pact
on…
the
high
way
s net
wor
k””.
One
of t
he b
asic
cond
ition
s the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
need
s to
mee
t is t
hat i
t “ha
s reg
ard
to n
atio
nal p
olicy
and
adv
ice c
onta
ined
in g
uida
nce
issue
d by
the
Secr
etar
y of
Sta
te” P
arag
raph
109
of t
he N
PPF
stat
es th
at “D
evel
opm
ent
shou
ld o
nly
be p
reve
nted
or r
efus
ed o
n hi
ghw
ays g
roun
ds if
ther
e w
ould
be
an u
nacc
epta
ble
impa
ct o
n hi
ghw
ay sa
fety
, or t
he re
sidua
l cu
mul
ativ
e im
pact
s on
the
road
net
wor
k w
ould
be
seve
re”
It is
not c
lear
whe
ther
“una
ccep
tabl
e im
pact
on…
the
high
way
s net
wor
k”
is an
equ
ival
ent t
est t
o th
at se
t out
in th
e N
PPF
whi
ch c
ould
lead
to a
la
ck o
f cla
rity
in d
ecisi
on m
akin
g.
Agre
e. T
he P
lan
will
be
amen
ded.
Am
end
the
first
sent
ence
of P
olicy
LA
X 18
as f
ollo
ws:
Prop
osal
s for
new
bus
ines
s de
velo
pmen
t will
be
supp
orte
d w
here
sit
es a
re lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
Settl
emen
t Bo
unda
ry id
entif
ied
on th
e Po
licie
s M
ap, w
here
they
wou
ld n
ot h
ave
an
unac
cept
able
impa
ct o
n re
siden
tial
amen
ity, h
erita
ge a
sset
s, an
d th
e hi
ghw
ays n
etw
ork
high
way
safe
ty, o
r
94
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n To
ens
ure
alig
nmen
t with
nat
iona
l pol
icy a
nd th
at th
is po
licy
can
mee
t th
e ba
sic c
ondi
tions
, an
amen
dmen
t to
brin
g th
e op
enin
g st
atem
ent o
f th
is po
licy
in a
ccor
danc
e w
ith p
arag
raph
109
of t
he N
PPF
is as
follo
ws:
“…w
here
they
wou
ld n
ot h
ave
an u
nacc
epta
ble
impa
ct o
n re
siden
tial
amen
ity, h
erita
ge a
sset
s, an
d th
e hi
ghw
ays n
etw
ork
high
way
safe
ty, o
r th
e re
sidua
l cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts o
n th
e ro
ad n
etw
ork
wou
ld b
e se
vere
.”
the
resid
ual c
umul
ativ
e im
pact
s on
the
road
net
wor
k w
ould
be
seve
re.
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il Cr
iteria
a) r
efer
s to
supp
ort f
or b
usin
ess o
utsid
e th
e se
ttlem
ent
boun
dary
whe
re th
ey a
re lo
cate
d on
land
des
igna
ted
in th
e de
velo
pmen
t pla
n. Q
stn:
Whi
ch d
evel
opm
ent p
lan
is th
is?
The
wor
ding
in th
is po
licy
is co
nsist
ent w
ith P
olicy
B&
R 17
of
the
Bote
sdal
e an
d Ri
ckin
ghal
l N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n.
Non
e
J Alch
in
Em
ploy
men
t is r
equi
red
for y
oung
er p
eopl
e - c
onsis
tent
with
futu
re
deve
lopm
ent.
Not
ed
Non
e
L Hu
nt
Th
e po
licy
stat
es th
at ...
."dev
elop
men
t will
be
supp
orte
d w
here
site
s are
lo
cate
d w
ithin
the
Settl
emen
t Bou
ndar
y id
entif
ied
on th
e Po
licie
s Map
. "
This
impl
ies t
hat t
hey
have
alre
ady
been
iden
tifie
d, w
hich
is n
ot th
e ca
se.
This
is m
islea
ding
, so
plea
se re
wor
d.
It is
the
Settl
emen
t Bou
ndar
y th
at
is id
entif
ied
on th
e Po
licie
s Map
. N
one
M H
unt
LA
X 18
indi
cate
s tha
t lan
d is
desig
nate
d on
Pol
icies
Map
but
not
show
n.
This
is m
islea
ding
. It
is th
e Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary
that
is
iden
tifie
d on
the
Polic
ies M
ap.
Non
e
Polic
y LA
X 19
– F
arm
Div
ersi
ficat
ion
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il W
e m
ake
no c
omm
ent o
n th
is po
licy
at th
is tim
e Pa
ra 1
3.2
Re-a
rrang
e th
e ph
otog
raph
s so
the
orde
r mat
ches
the
arro
ws
on M
ap 9
.
Not
ed
Agre
ed
Amen
d Pa
ragr
aph
13.2
as f
ollo
ws:
Ther
e ar
e fo
ur e
ntra
nces
to th
e vi
llage
–
the
two
prin
cipal
gat
eway
s (n
umbe
red
1 an
d 3
on th
e m
ap a
nd in
th
e ph
otog
raph
s bel
ow) a
re o
n th
e m
ain
rout
e th
roug
h th
e vi
llage
, the
B1
117.
N
umbe
r pho
tos a
s fol
low
s: 1.
Sta
tion
Road
(eas
t bou
nd v
iew
) 2.
Bick
ers H
ill R
oad
(wes
t bou
nd v
iew
) 3.
Vica
rage
Roa
d (w
est b
ound
vie
w)
4. F
ram
lingh
am R
oad
(eas
t bou
nd
view
)
95
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Pa
ra 1
3.6
Penu
ltim
ate
line.
Sug
gest
full-
stop
afte
r ‘da
nger
ous’
and
star
t ne
w se
nten
ce w
ith “T
here
hav
e …
”
Agre
ed
Amen
d se
cond
sent
ence
of p
ara
13.6
as
follo
ws:
Give
n th
e ge
nera
l inc
reas
e in
traf
fic,
inclu
ding
larg
e ag
ricul
tura
l veh
icles
, tra
velli
ng th
roug
h th
e vi
llage
, thi
s is
pote
ntia
lly v
ery
dang
erou
s. Tt
here
ha
ve a
lread
y be
en in
ciden
ts w
here
ca
rs re
vers
ing
away
from
the
Co-o
p ha
ve b
acke
d in
to c
ars p
arke
d ac
ross
th
e ro
ad.
J A
lchin
Crea
tive
use
of la
nd w
ould
be
bene
ficia
l. N
oted
N
one
J Wor
thin
gton
In te
xt o
f rep
ort s
how
how
CA
16 c
an b
e us
ed to
dev
elop
new
bus
ines
s op
portu
nitie
s and
div
ersif
y lo
cal e
cono
my
and
prim
e se
ctor
agr
icultu
re
Not
ed
Non
e
E N
ason
No
cam
p sit
es.
Not
ed
Non
e Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
16
D Al
chin
Impe
rativ
e fo
r the
futu
re v
iabi
lity
of th
e co
mm
unity
. N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Al
l gro
up a
ctio
ns w
ould
be
bene
ficia
l. N
oted
N
one
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 17
N
o co
mm
ents
rece
ived
Ch
apte
r 12
– O
ther
Com
men
ts
No
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
Polic
y LA
X 20
– P
ublic
Rig
hts o
f Way
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
We
mak
e no
com
men
t on
this
polic
y at
this
time.
N
oted
N
one
C Em
eny
Fu
lly su
ppor
ted
200%
N
oted
N
one
J Alch
in
Ca
r sha
ring
is a
good
/sim
ple
plan
N
oted
N
one
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
Polic
y LA
X20
rega
rdin
g Pu
blic
Righ
ts o
f Way
is e
xem
plar
y an
d th
e Co
unty
Cou
ncil
is su
ppor
tive
of th
is po
licy.
N
oted
and
Tha
nk Y
ou
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 18
J A
lchin
An a
mal
gam
ated
gro
up.
Not
ed
Non
e
96
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
19
No
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 20
E
Nas
on
Pu
blic
trans
port
still
nee
ded.
Dia
l-a-r
ide
not p
ossib
le fo
r som
e ol
der
resid
ents
. N
oted
N
one
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
I wou
ld a
dd th
e po
ssib
ility
of a
vill
age
owne
d el
ectri
c ca
r whi
ch c
ould
be
rent
ed p
er h
our b
y th
e re
siden
ts.
This
mig
ht c
ut d
own
the
amou
nt o
f ca
rs o
wne
d by
peo
ple
who
onl
y ne
ed th
eir c
ar o
ccas
iona
lly.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 21
C
Emen
y
In g
ener
al, I
wou
ld li
ke th
e Ch
urch
Pla
in to
be
used
onl
y by
peo
ple
visit
ing
the
shop
, mus
eum
, Chu
rch
& th
e Ro
yal O
ak, n
ot fo
r ove
rnig
ht
park
ing
or p
arki
ng fo
r hou
ses a
roun
d th
e ar
ea a
t any
tim
e, o
ur sh
op,
Chur
ch, p
ubs &
mus
eum
are
so im
porta
nt to
our
vill
age
& th
ey a
ll ne
ed
park
ing
spac
es.
Not
ed
Non
e
E N
ason
Disc
oura
ge c
ar p
arki
ng o
n pa
vem
ents
and
ver
ges.
N
oted
N
one
Anon
ymou
s
We
have
bee
n ba
ngin
g on
abo
ut p
arki
ng a
s lon
g as
i ca
n re
mem
ber,
but w
ith m
ore
cars
nee
ded
with
in th
e vi
llage
as t
here
is n
o ot
her m
ood
of tr
ansp
ort,
peop
le h
ave
utili
sed
spac
e by
con
verti
ng g
arag
es, b
uild
ing
in th
eir g
roun
ds fo
r var
ying
reas
ons w
ith n
o th
ough
t of w
here
they
m
ight
par
k th
eir v
ehicl
es. P
arki
ng c
ould
be
mad
e av
aila
ble
on th
e pl
ayin
g fie
ld b
ut th
ere
agai
n no
wal
king
acc
ess.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 22
An
onym
ous
W
e ne
ed th
e sh
op.
Not
ed
Non
e Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
23
M W
illis
As
we
live
on R
owes
Hill
whi
ch i
thin
k 80
% o
f the
vill
age
have
nev
er
hear
d of
, Eve
ryth
ing
in th
e pl
an is
ver
y ve
ry g
ood,
but
as t
he ro
ad o
ut o
f th
e vi
llage
seem
s to
be o
ne o
f the
mos
t dan
gero
us w
ith a
ll th
e be
nds,
no st
reet
ligh
ts o
r pav
emen
ts it
seem
s to
be fo
rgot
ten.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 24
C
Emen
y
I jus
t don
't th
ink
this
is po
ssib
le g
iven
the
larg
e Co
-op
deliv
ery
lorri
es. I
n an
idea
l wor
ld it
wou
ld b
e fa
ntas
tic b
ut I
don'
t thi
nk it
will
hap
pen.
N
oted
N
one
97
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n J A
lchin
Nee
d to
pro
mot
e su
stai
nabl
e m
etho
ds.
Not
ed
Non
e M
Ste
vens
Mos
t thi
ngs r
e de
liver
ed b
y v
ans o
r pos
t ---
do
we
wan
t an
amat
eur
deliv
ery
post
al sy
stem
?
Van
deliv
erie
s are
now
muc
h im
prov
ed a
nd e
cono
mica
lly m
anag
ed
Not
ed
Non
e
J Ree
ve
Th
is w
ould
just
cau
se th
e sa
me
prob
lem
in a
diff
eren
t pla
ce.
Not
seen
as a
via
ble
optio
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 25
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
25
The
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 25
whi
ch a
ims t
o te
st th
e fe
asib
ility
of c
reat
ing
Qui
et L
anes
is a
ckno
wle
dged
. SCC
cur
rent
ly h
as n
o pl
ans o
r fun
ding
to
expa
nd th
e pr
ovisi
ons o
f qui
et la
nes w
ithin
Suf
folk
, how
ever
if g
roup
s (s
uch
as p
arish
cou
ncils
) can
iden
tify
fund
ing
to c
arry
out
wor
ks
requ
ired
to e
stab
lish
a qu
iet l
ane
then
it m
ay b
e po
ssib
le. T
here
are
cr
iteria
for t
he d
esig
natio
n of
a Q
uiet
Lan
e, w
here
a sp
eed
and
volu
me
surv
ey n
eeds
to sh
ow lo
w sp
eeds
and
littl
e us
e. Q
uiet
Lan
es a
re n
ot
traffi
c ca
lmin
g or
spee
d re
ducin
g m
easu
res,
they
are
to a
dvise
driv
ers o
f th
e lik
elih
ood
of w
alke
rs, c
yclis
ts a
nd e
ques
trian
s .
Not
ed
Non
e
C Em
eny
O
nly
one
way
to sl
ow tr
affic
, tha
t is w
ith sp
eed
hum
ps.
Not
ed
Non
e J W
orth
ingt
on
Co
nsid
er if
hav
e 3
wor
king
gro
ups f
or th
is Ch
apte
r 1.
Acc
essib
ility
2
Deliv
erie
s and
stor
age
3. A
ctiv
e tra
vel a
nd le
isure
Not
ed
Non
e
Chap
ter 1
3 –
Oth
er C
omm
ents
M
Col
eman
Exce
ptin
g w
here
I kn
ow li
ttle
of im
plica
tions
and
do
not f
eel s
trong
ly
eith
er w
ay.
Not
ed
Non
e
C Em
eny
se
e no
tes Q
. 52
Not
ed
Non
e M
Will
is
Apar
t fro
m 2
3 N
oted
N
one
Anon
ymou
s
Mor
e or
less
. N
oted
N
one
J Tre
adw
ay
2.
Park
ing
is an
impo
rtant
issu
e an
d du
e to
the
fact
the
villa
ge h
all h
as
rem
aine
d in
the
posit
ion
that
was
cho
sen
befo
re W
W2,
whe
n ca
r ow
ners
hip
was
lim
ited,
it n
ow c
ause
s ext
rem
e pa
rkin
g di
fficu
lty fo
r lar
ge
even
ts, c
ausin
g Th
e St
reet
to b
e cr
amm
ed w
ith c
ars.
Larg
e ve
hicle
s and
fa
rmin
g m
achi
nery
inclu
ding
com
bine
har
vest
ers s
till g
o th
roug
h in
the
even
ing.
Not
ed
Non
e
98
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n 3.
Spee
d is
an is
sue
not r
eally
add
ress
ed.
We
have
just
one
spee
d ca
mer
a w
hich
is m
oved
to a
nd fr
o be
twee
n th
ree
sites
. Thi
s rea
lly is
in
suffi
cient
. De
spite
the
cost
, the
re sh
ould
be
one
perm
anen
tly a
t eac
h en
d of
the
B111
7.
Befo
re, w
hen
one
faile
d, S
cole
Vill
age
had
one
at e
ach
end.
The
road
to
Hoxn
e ha
s a c
hica
ne a
dded
to it
s eas
tern
ent
ry to
slow
traf
fic. T
he
wes
tern
end
is to
all
inte
nts a
nd p
urpo
ses,
is ‘p
olice
d.’ b
y th
e sh
arp
bend
. O
ther
mea
sure
s tha
t hav
e w
orke
d is
a he
ight
ened
pre
senc
e of
the
spee
d ca
mer
a va
ns, T
he ro
ad th
roug
h W
eybr
ead
was
regu
larly
cov
ered
as
was
the
road
from
Fra
mlin
gham
to th
e A.
12. T
his h
as b
een
very
ef
fect
ive.
Wha
t hap
pens
on
the
B111
7 w
hich
pas
ses t
hrou
gh L
axfie
ld?
Not
hing
! Th
ere
is a
van
occa
siona
lly in
the
lay-
by a
t Wal
pole
Cem
eter
y or
in th
e ba
y ju
st b
efor
e th
e ro
ad le
ads u
p to
the
Heve
ning
ham
est
ate.
The
re is
al
so so
met
imes
one
in th
e la
y-by
at t
he c
emet
ery
in S
tradb
roke
. Why
is
Laxf
ield
igno
red?
We
have
a b
ay o
utsid
e th
e Ba
ptist
Cha
pel i
deal
to
catc
h sp
eedi
ng v
ehicl
es c
omin
g ei
ther
way
. If
you
live
on T
he S
treet
yo
u ar
e ve
ry a
war
e th
at c
ars,
boy
race
rs a
nd fa
rm v
ehicl
es a
re e
xcee
ding
th
e sp
eed
limit
on a
regu
lar b
asis.
Som
e fa
rm v
ehicl
es h
ave
whe
els a
s hi
gh a
s the
ave
rage
car
. Th
e vi
llage
shop
is e
xcel
lent
and
attr
acts
peo
ple
from
oth
er v
illag
es.
Cars
bac
k ou
t of t
his s
mal
l car
par
k sp
ace
with
lim
ited
visib
ility
into
on
com
ing
traffi
c. T
he b
end
is al
so a
noth
er h
azar
d. T
here
has
bee
n a
rece
nt in
ciden
t on
the
corn
er.
Sure
ly w
e:
1. C
ould
ask
for t
he sp
eed
van
to v
isit t
he v
illag
e re
gula
rly, e
spec
ially
in
the
mor
ning
and
eve
ning
pea
ks
2. C
ould
rein
stat
e th
e vi
llage
‘Spe
ed W
atch
’. I w
ould
be
happ
y to
be
part
of a
new
ly tr
aine
d te
am.
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 23
seek
s to
addr
ess t
hese
con
cern
s. N
oted
N
oted
N
oted
Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
21 se
eks t
o ad
dres
s the
se c
once
rns.
Not
ed
Non
e N
one
Non
e N
one
Non
e N
one
99
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n 4.
Pub
lic T
rans
port
in th
e vi
llage
is a
ppal
ling.
Tho
se w
ith fr
ee b
us p
asse
s ha
ve n
o re
gula
r tim
ed b
us se
rvice
s. Po
intle
ss h
avin
g it!
I us
e m
ine
on
occa
siona
l visi
ts to
Lon
don.
I h
ave
had
man
y co
mpl
aint
s for
the
elde
rly a
nd th
ose
in H
arte
smer
e Ho
use
sayi
ng th
ey fe
el m
aroo
ned.
Thi
s is a
s im
porta
nt a
n iss
ue a
s fas
t br
oadb
and,
I us
ed to
driv
e th
e co
mm
unity
bus
from
Lax
field
to
Hale
swor
th o
n W
edne
sday
s as a
vol
unte
er d
river
. The
15
seat
er b
us w
as
alw
ays f
ull a
nd so
met
imes
I co
uld
not c
olle
ct th
ose
wai
ting
in
Hunt
ingf
ied
due
to th
e nu
mbe
rs o
n bo
ard.
l. I
wen
t on
this
bus j
ust
befo
re th
e se
rvice
was
cut
last
Oct
ober
. . It
was
still
full.
Whe
re is
the
sens
e in
that
? W
e ca
n’t e
xpec
t hou
rly a
nd d
aily
bus
es h
ere,
but
one
or
two
a w
eek
with
ade
quat
e tim
e in
Hal
esw
orth
or D
iss m
ust b
e po
ssib
le.
As th
e Pa
nora
ma
repo
rt m
ade
clear
at t
he b
egin
ning
of M
arch
,, sin
ce
the
That
cher
de-
regu
latio
n of
bus
es in
the
80’s,
bus
serv
ices h
ave
decli
ned
by o
ver 5
0%. D
espi
te e
ven
limite
d fu
ndin
g av
aila
ble
to lo
cal
auth
oriti
es, t
hese
serv
ices a
re c
ut b
ecau
se a
s the
pre
sent
er re
mar
ked
it is
now
con
trolle
d by
pro
fit a
nd n
ot n
eed.
Cyc
ling
is a
dang
erou
s act
ivity
le
avin
g th
e vi
llage
in a
ny d
irect
ion.
With
no
publ
ic tra
nspo
rt an
y fu
rther
de
velo
pmen
t wou
ld b
e ad
ding
to th
e iss
ue o
f gl
obal
war
min
g.
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
Tran
spor
t La
xfie
ld V
illag
e is
iden
tifie
d as
a H
inte
rland
Vill
age;
Sta
tion
Road
, Hig
h St
reet
and
Vica
rage
Roa
d ar
e th
e B
road
cla
ssifi
ed ro
ad (B
1117
) par
t of
the
stra
tegi
c hi
ghw
ay n
etw
ork
is th
e m
ain
rout
e th
roug
h th
e vi
llage
w
hich
link
s the
Hev
enin
gham
to S
tradb
roke
. The
vill
age
cent
re is
with
in
a 30
mph
spee
d lim
it.
The
Plan
doe
s not
show
the
rece
nt a
ppro
ved
site
on F
ram
lingh
am R
oad
DC/1
9/02
312,
for 4
9 dw
ellin
gs. T
his s
ite w
ill p
rovi
de im
prov
ed
pede
stria
n cr
ossin
g fa
ciliti
es n
ear t
he sc
hool
and
to th
e PR
OW
net
wor
k.
Sust
aina
ble
Trav
el
The
issue
s rai
sed
rega
rdin
g pu
blic
trans
port
are
note
d. S
hifti
ng to
mor
e su
stai
nabl
e m
odes
of t
rans
port
can
help
with
the
redu
ctio
n of
em
issio
ns
thro
ugh
redu
cing
traffi
c an
d co
nges
tion,
by
enco
urag
ing
the
use
of
non-
car m
odes
of t
rans
port
for s
hort
jour
neys
, suc
h as
wal
king
and
cy
cling
. The
inte
rest
in th
is fro
m th
e pa
rish
is hi
ghlig
hted
in T
IDI-6
, w
hich
is w
elco
med
by
the
coun
cil. S
CC is
also
supp
ortiv
e of
par
agra
ph
Not
ed
The
perm
issio
n ha
s yet
to b
e iss
ued
by M
SDC
Not
ed
Non
e N
one
Non
e
100
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n 8.
25 a
nd P
olicy
LAX
11 re
gard
ing
cycle
stor
age
and
park
ing,
as t
his c
an
help
to in
crea
se th
e us
age
of su
stai
nabl
e m
odes
of t
rans
port.
Chap
ter 1
4 –
Oth
er C
omm
ents
M
Ste
vens
BUT
--- 1
4.3
-- s
tate
how
ofte
n --
on
at le
ast a
n an
nual
/ 6
mon
thly
ba
sis --
repo
rting
bac
k to
the
villa
ge
Agre
ed
Amen
d pa
ragr
aph
14.3
as f
ollo
ws:
The
Paris
h Co
uncil
will
mon
itor t
he
Plan
at l
east
ann
ually
to e
nsur
e th
at it
re
mai
ns re
leva
nt a
nd a
ppro
pria
te
give
n ch
ange
s to
Loca
l and
Nat
iona
l Pl
anni
ng P
olicy
and
will
repo
rt th
e ou
tcom
e to
Par
ish re
siden
ts.
Po
licie
s Map
Com
men
ts
M
id S
uffo
lk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il
Inse
t Map
If p
ossib
le, a
nnot
ate
the
two
hous
ing
site
allo
catio
ns o
n th
e m
ap
Agre
e In
set M
ap to
be
amen
ded
to a
nnot
ate
hous
ing
site
allo
catio
ns.
J Alch
in
Be
autif
ully
pre
sent
ed, n
o ch
ange
s req
uire
d.
Not
ed
Non
e J W
orth
ingt
on
Bo
th im
porta
nt m
aps
Paris
h w
ide
polic
ies m
ap c
ross
refe
renc
e to
rele
vant
pol
icies
. Vi
llage
cen
tre p
olici
es m
ap p
ropo
sed
settl
emen
t bou
ndar
y 20
18- 2
025
Not
ed
Non
e
J Gra
ham
&
R M
atth
ews
Se
e co
mm
ents
in L
AX 1
5.
N
oted
N
one
Appe
ndic
es C
omm
ents
Mid
Suf
folk
Di
stric
t Cou
ncil
Appe
ndix
1 Su
gges
t you
man
y w
ant t
o ad
d an
intro
duct
ory
para
’ at t
he
top:
“The
info
rmat
ion
in th
is ap
pend
ix w
as c
orre
ct a
t the
tim
e of
writ
ing
this
Plan
. Up
to d
ate
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e so
ught
from
the
loca
l pl
anni
ng a
utho
rity,
the
Paris
h Co
uncil
or a
ppro
pria
te st
atut
ory
body
.”
Agre
e bu
t ref
eren
ce to
the
Paris
h Co
uncil
is n
ot a
ppro
pria
te
Amen
d Ap
pend
ix 1
by in
serti
ng th
e fo
llow
ing
text
afte
r the
title
:
The
info
rmat
ion
in th
is ap
pend
ix w
as
corre
ct a
t the
tim
e of
writ
ing
this
Plan
. Up
to d
ate
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e so
ught
from
Hist
oric
Engl
and
or M
id
Suffo
lk D
istric
t Cou
ncil.
101
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n C
Emen
y
Appe
ndix
2 po
int 8
shou
ld re
ad B
ridge
Stre
et, n
ot G
oram
s Mill
Lan
e.
Not
e: so
me
peop
le c
all i
t Mar
ket S
treet
as w
ell.
The
desc
riptio
n w
ill b
e am
ende
d to
inclu
de re
fere
nce
to B
ridge
St
reet
.
Amen
d Ap
pend
ix 2,
poi
nt 8
as f
ollo
ws:
8. B
ridge
Hou
se, G
oram
s Mill
Lan
e (B
ridge
Stre
et) –
J Alch
in
Ex
celle
nt C
ompr
ehen
sive
Not
ed
Non
e C
Win
gate
Appe
ndix
2 - B
uild
ings
of L
ocal
Sig
nific
ance
Sh
ould
read
- Ex
ampl
es o
f Bui
ldin
gs, e
tc. e
tc, a
s the
re a
re m
any
mor
e th
an ju
st th
ose
liste
d.
Such
an
amen
dmen
t wou
ld m
ake
the
Plan
vag
ue a
nd n
ot p
rovi
de
certa
inty
to u
sers
of t
he P
lan
Non
e
J Ree
ve
Al
l add
ress
es re
ferre
d to
as '
The
Stre
et' s
houl
d be
am
ende
d to
'Hig
h St
reet
' (la
nd re
gist
ry).
The
list r
efle
cts t
he d
escr
iptio
n on
Hi
stor
ic En
glan
d’s w
ebsit
e.
Non
e
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
Appe
ndix
3.
Loca
l opp
ositi
on to
new
bui
lds M
/168
3/15
/FUL
and
DC/
17/0
4032
/FUL
, DC
/17/
0631
3/FU
L w
as ig
nore
d an
d al
l deg
rade
d th
e hi
stor
ic ho
uses
, all
grad
e 2
that
they
wer
e bu
ilt b
ehin
d an
d us
ed la
rge
piec
es o
f lan
d.
Muc
h op
posit
ion
to M
/364
2/16
/OUT
- Te
n ho
uses
on
Bick
ers H
ill. A
ro
ad w
ith n
o pa
vem
ents
into
the
villa
ge a
nd p
ossib
ly th
e m
ost
dang
erou
s are
a to
bui
ld in
Lax
field
apa
rt fro
m o
ppos
ite th
e sc
hool
.
Not
ed
Non
e
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil
For A
ppen
dix
2: B
uild
ings
of L
ocal
Inte
rest
, far
mst
eads
in L
axfie
ld h
ave
been
revi
ewed
at a
hig
h le
vel f
or a
n on
goin
g pr
ojec
t und
erta
ken
and
fund
ed b
y Hi
stor
ic En
glan
d. It
is su
gges
ted
that
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od
Plan
may
wish
to c
onsid
er w
heth
er th
e ex
ercis
e ad
ds a
ny
deta
il/in
form
atio
n to
the
list i
n Ap
pend
ix 2,
and
ent
ries f
rom
the
proj
ect
can
be se
en th
roug
h th
e He
ritag
e Ex
plor
er.
Not
ed –
than
k yo
u.
The
Herit
age
Expl
orer
ent
ries w
ill
be c
onsid
ered
as p
art o
f N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n re
view
Non
e
Oth
er C
omm
ents
Ju
lie C
olle
tt
Cler
k to
Ub
best
on P
C W
e iso
late
d th
e m
ain
polic
ies f
rom
the
docu
men
t min
us P
olici
es 3
-7
inclu
sive,
whi
ch re
fer t
o pa
rticu
lar p
oten
tial b
uild
ing
sites
and
we
didn
’t fe
el it
was
our
pla
ce to
com
men
t on
thes
e.
All t
he o
ther
pol
icies
we
wer
e in
supp
ort o
f as t
hey
do h
ave
an im
pact
on
our
ow
n ar
ea a
butti
ng L
axfie
ld p
arish
in a
s muc
h as
the
Plan
seek
s to
pres
erve
the
char
acte
r of t
he c
ount
rysid
e; is
in li
ne w
ith U
bbes
ton
resid
ents
’ vie
ws o
n av
oidi
ng li
ght p
ollu
tion
and
seek
ing
to b
e as
gre
en
as p
ossib
le.
Not
ed
Non
e
102
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Po
licie
s whi
ch re
fer t
o th
e ch
arac
ter o
f the
vill
age
of L
axfie
ld, t
he h
istor
ic bu
ildin
gs, t
he a
men
ities
, a d
esire
to re
gula
te tr
affic
, enc
oura
ge
alte
rnat
ive
mea
ns o
f tra
nspo
rt ot
her t
han
cars
, pre
serv
atio
n of
gre
en
spac
es e
tc a
ll ar
e w
elco
me
stat
emen
ts w
hich
are
ben
efici
al to
Ubb
esto
n as
a n
eigh
bour
and
freq
uent
use
r of a
ll La
xfie
ld h
as to
offe
r.
In b
rief,
Ubbe
ston
Par
ish C
ounc
il is
supp
ortiv
e of
all
polic
ies e
xcep
t 3-7
in
clusiv
e, w
here
we
rem
ain
neut
ral.
Lu
ke W
atso
n O
ffice
of R
t Hon
Dr
Thé
rèse
Co
ffey
MP
Suffo
lk C
oast
al
and
Secr
etar
y of
St
ate
at
the
Depa
rtmen
t for
W
ork
&
Pens
ions
Dr C
offe
y th
anks
you
for b
ringi
ng th
is to
her
atte
ntio
n bu
t she
will
leav
e it
to th
e lo
cal M
P, D
an P
oulte
r, to
pro
vide
a su
bmiss
ion
for y
our l
ocal
N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n.
Not
ed
Non
e
Robe
rt C.
T.W
ardl
ey
Denn
ingt
on
Paris
h Co
uncil
Th
ank
you
for s
endi
ng u
s you
r nei
ghbo
urho
od p
lan
cons
ulta
tion
docu
men
t. As
cha
irman
of D
enni
ngto
n pa
rish
Coun
cil, c
ongr
atul
atio
ns o
n pr
oduc
ing
such
a d
etai
led
plan
, my
inte
ntio
n is
to p
lace
this
on o
ur
agen
da fo
r disc
ussio
n at
our
nex
t mee
ting
on th
e 16
th M
arch
. W
e ar
e in
disc
ussio
ns a
t the
mom
ent a
bout
pro
ducin
g on
e fo
r De
nnin
gton
and
I’m
inte
rest
ed in
how
long
it h
as ta
ken
you
from
star
t to
fini
sh to
pro
duce
you
rs a
nd h
ow m
any
of p
eopl
e w
ere
invo
lved
to
put i
t tog
ethe
r. I’m
fully
aw
are
of th
e ha
rd w
ork
invo
lved
and
the
poss
ible
hea
dach
es
you
may
hav
e ha
d ho
wev
er I
thin
k yo
u’ve
don
e ex
trem
ely
wel
l.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
Ellie
Rob
erts
W
ater
M
anag
emen
t Al
lianc
e
The
site
is ne
ar to
the
Inte
rnal
Dra
inag
e Di
stric
t (ID
D) o
f the
Eas
t Suf
folk
In
tern
al D
rain
age
Boar
d (ID
B) a
nd th
eref
ore
the
Boar
d’s B
yela
ws a
pply
. A
copy
of t
he B
oard
's By
elaw
s can
be
acce
ssed
on
our w
ebsit
e
Not
ed
Non
e
103
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n (h
ttps:/
/ww
w.w
lma.
org.
uk/u
ploa
ds/E
SIDB
_Bye
law
s.pdf
), al
ong
with
map
s of
the
IDD
(http
s://w
ww
.wlm
a.or
g.uk
/upl
oads
/ESI
DB_In
dex_
plan
). Th
ese
map
s also
show
whi
ch w
ater
cour
ses h
ave
been
des
igna
ted
as
'Ado
pted
Wat
erco
urse
s' by
the
Boar
d. T
he a
dopt
ion
of a
wat
erco
urse
is
an a
ckno
wle
dgem
ent b
y th
e Bo
ard
that
the
wat
erco
urse
is o
f arte
rial
impo
rtanc
e to
the
IDD
and
as su
ch w
ill n
orm
ally
rece
ive
mai
nten
ance
fro
m th
e ID
B.
In o
rder
to a
void
con
flict
bet
wee
n th
e pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss a
nd th
e Bo
ard'
s re
gula
tory
regi
me
and
cons
entin
g pr
oces
s ple
ase
be a
war
e of
the
follo
win
g:
Sho
uld
any
deve
lopm
ent p
ropo
se to
disc
harg
e su
rface
wat
er to
a
wat
erco
urse
with
in th
e ID
D (d
irect
ly o
r ind
irect
ly),
the
prop
osed
de
velo
pmen
t will
requ
ire la
nd d
rain
age
cons
ent i
n lin
e w
ith th
e Bo
ard’
s by
elaw
s (sp
ecifi
cally
bye
law
3).
Any
cons
ent g
rant
ed w
ill li
kely
be
cond
ition
al, p
endi
ng th
e pa
ymen
t of a
Sur
face
Wat
er D
evel
opm
ent
Cont
ribut
ion
fee,
cal
cula
ted
in li
ne w
ith th
e Bo
ard’
s cha
rgin
g po
licy.
(http
s://w
ww
.wlm
a.or
g.uk
/upl
oads
/WM
A_Ta
ble_
of_C
harg
es_a
nd_F
ees.p
df).
Whi
lst th
e co
nsen
ting
proc
ess a
s set
out
und
er th
e La
nd D
rain
age
Act
1991
and
the
afor
emen
tione
d By
elaw
s are
sepa
rate
from
pla
nnin
g, th
e ab
ility
to im
plem
ent a
pla
nnin
g pe
rmiss
ion
may
be
depe
nden
t on
the
gran
ting
of th
ese
cons
ents
. As s
uch
we
stro
ngly
reco
mm
end
that
any
re
quire
d co
nsen
t is s
ough
t prio
r to
dete
rmin
atio
n of
a p
lann
ing
appl
icatio
n.
N
atio
nal G
rid
LAXF
IELD
NEI
GHBO
URHO
OD
PLAN
(REG
ULAT
ION
14)
CO
NSU
LTAT
ION
Re
pres
enta
tions
on
beha
lf of
Nat
iona
l Grid
Nat
iona
l Grid
has
app
oint
ed
Aviso
n Yo
ung
to re
view
and
resp
ond
to N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n co
nsul
tatio
ns o
n its
beh
alf.
We
are
inst
ruct
ed b
y ou
r clie
nt to
subm
it th
e fo
llow
ing
repr
esen
tatio
n w
ith re
gard
to th
e cu
rrent
con
sulta
tion
on th
e ab
ove
docu
men
t. Ab
out N
atio
nal G
rid N
atio
nal G
rid E
lect
ricity
Tr
ansm
issio
n pl
c (N
GET)
ow
ns a
nd m
aint
ains
the
elec
tricit
y tra
nsm
issio
n sy
stem
in E
ngla
nd a
nd W
ales
. The
ene
rgy
is th
en d
istrib
uted
to th
e el
ectri
city
dist
ribut
ion
netw
ork
oper
ator
s acr
oss E
ngla
nd, W
ales
and
Sc
otla
nd. N
atio
nal G
rid G
as p
lc (N
GG) o
wns
and
ope
rate
s the
hig
h-pr
essu
re g
as tr
ansm
issio
n sy
stem
acr
oss t
he U
K. In
the
UK, g
as le
aves
th
e tra
nsm
issio
n sy
stem
and
ent
ers t
he U
K’s f
our g
as d
istrib
utio
n ne
twor
ks w
here
pre
ssur
e is
redu
ced
for p
ublic
use
. Nat
iona
l Grid
Ve
ntur
es (N
GV) i
s sep
arat
e fro
m N
atio
nal G
rid’s
core
regu
late
d
Not
ed
Non
e
104
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n bu
sines
ses.
NGV
dev
elop
, ope
rate
and
inve
st in
ene
rgy
proj
ects
, te
chno
logi
es, a
nd p
artn
ersh
ips t
o he
lp a
ccel
erat
e th
e de
velo
pmen
t of a
cle
an e
nerg
y fu
ture
for c
onsu
mer
s acr
oss t
he U
K, E
urop
e an
d th
e Un
ited
Stat
es. P
ropo
sed
deve
lopm
ent s
ites c
ross
ed b
y or
in c
lose
pro
ximity
to
Nat
iona
l Grid
ass
ets A
n as
sess
men
t has
bee
n ca
rried
out
with
resp
ect t
o N
atio
nal G
rid’s
elec
tricit
y an
d ga
s tra
nsm
issio
n as
sets
whi
ch in
clude
hi
gh v
olta
ge e
lect
ricity
ass
ets a
nd h
igh-
pres
sure
gas
pip
elin
es. N
atio
nal
Grid
has
iden
tifie
d th
at it
has
no
reco
rd o
f suc
h as
sets
with
in th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ar
ea. N
atio
nal G
rid p
rovi
des i
nfor
mat
ion
in
rela
tion
to it
s ass
ets a
t the
web
site
belo
w. •
w
ww
2.na
tiona
lgrid
.com
/uk/
serv
ices/
land
-and
deve
lopm
ent/
plan
ning
-au
thor
ity/s
hape
-file
s/ P
leas
e al
so se
e at
tach
ed in
form
atio
n ou
tlini
ng
guid
ance
on
deve
lopm
ent c
lose
to N
atio
nal G
rid in
frast
ruct
ure.
Di
strib
utio
n N
etw
orks
Info
rmat
ion
rega
rdin
g th
e el
ectri
city
dist
ribut
ion
netw
ork
is av
aila
ble
at th
e w
ebsit
e be
low
: ww
w.e
nerg
ynet
wor
ks.o
rg.u
k In
form
atio
n re
gard
ing
the
gas d
istrib
utio
n ne
twor
k is
avai
labl
e by
co
ntac
ting:
pla
ntpr
otec
tion@
cade
ntga
s.com
Fur
ther
Adv
ice P
leas
e re
mem
ber t
o co
nsul
t Nat
iona
l Grid
on
any
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Docu
men
ts o
r site
-spe
cific
prop
osal
s tha
t cou
ld a
ffect
our
ass
ets.
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
Th
ank
you
for c
onsu
lting
Suf
folk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil (S
CC) o
n th
e Pr
e-Su
bmiss
ion
vers
ion
of th
e La
xfie
ld N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n. S
CC is
not
a
plan
mak
ing
auth
ority
, exc
ept f
or m
iner
als a
nd w
aste
. How
ever
, it i
s a
fund
amen
tal p
art o
f the
pla
nnin
g sy
stem
bei
ng re
spon
sible
for m
atte
rs
inclu
ding
: - A
rcha
eolo
gy -
Educ
atio
n - F
ire a
nd R
escu
e - F
lood
ing
- He
alth
and
Wel
lbei
ng -
Libra
ries -
Min
eral
s and
Was
te -
Nat
ural
En
viro
nmen
t - P
ublic
Rig
hts o
f Way
- Tr
ansp
ort T
his r
espo
nse,
as w
ith
all t
hose
com
men
ts w
hich
SCC
mak
es o
n em
ergi
ng p
lann
ing
polic
ies
and
allo
catio
ns, w
ill fo
cus o
n m
atte
rs re
latin
g to
thos
e se
rvice
s.
Suffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
is su
ppor
tive
of th
e vi
sion
for t
he P
arish
. In
this
lette
r we
aim
to h
ighl
ight
pot
entia
l iss
ues a
nd o
ppor
tuni
ties i
n th
e pl
an
and
are
happ
y to
disc
uss a
nyth
ing
that
is ra
ised.
Whe
re a
men
dmen
ts to
th
e pl
an a
re su
gges
ted
adde
d te
xt w
ill b
e in
ital
ics a
nd d
elet
ed te
xt w
ill
be in
strik
ethr
ough
. Ar
chae
olog
y
Not
ed
Not
ed
Non
e N
one
105
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n Th
e Co
unty
Cou
ncil
wel
com
es th
e re
fere
nces
to a
rcha
eolo
gy w
ithin
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan.
It is
sugg
este
d th
at th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n m
ay
wish
to in
clude
in th
e “L
axfie
ld, A
Sho
rt Hi
stor
y” se
ctio
n, th
at th
ere
are
Preh
istor
ic an
d Ro
man
find
s rec
orde
d fro
m th
e pa
rish,
par
ticul
arly
re
late
d to
the
topo
grap
hy a
nd w
ater
cour
ses,
whi
ch h
ints
at e
arly
oc
cupa
tion
in th
e ar
ea.
Educ
atio
n
Early
Yea
rs
Laxf
ield
is in
the
Stra
dbro
ke a
nd L
axfie
ld W
ard
whe
re a
t the
pre
-sch
ool
ther
e is
a su
rplu
s of o
ne fu
ll tim
e pl
ace.
As t
he m
ajor
ity o
f the
pla
nned
70
dw
ellin
gs a
re p
erm
itted
it is
not
exp
ecte
d th
at a
dditi
onal
ear
ly y
ears
ca
pacit
y w
ill b
e re
quire
d as
a re
sult
of th
e ne
ighb
ourh
ood
plan
The
st
rate
gy fo
r Ear
ly Y
ears
in th
e St
radb
roke
and
Lax
field
War
d in
the
draf
t In
frast
ruct
ure
Deliv
ery
Fram
ewor
k, w
hich
acc
ompa
nied
the
draf
t Joi
nt
Loca
l Pla
n, is
to e
xpan
d th
e se
tting
in S
tradb
roke
. How
ever
, the
Join
t Lo
cal P
lan
is cu
rrent
ly a
n ite
rativ
e do
cum
ent a
nd th
is st
rate
gy m
ay b
e re
vise
d.
Prim
ary
Educ
atio
n
All S
aint
s Chu
rch
of E
ngla
nd P
rimar
y Sc
hool
is th
e pr
imar
y ed
ucat
ion
prov
ider
for L
axfie
ld, w
ith a
cap
acity
of 1
19 p
lace
s, ho
wev
er fo
r pla
nnin
g pu
rpos
es a
95%
cap
acity
is u
sed,
mak
ing
a to
tal o
f 113
pla
ces.
It is
note
d th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n st
ates
that
the
prim
ary
scho
ol is
alre
ady
at c
apac
ity, w
hich
is c
orre
ct. T
he sc
hool
is c
urre
ntly
fore
cast
to e
xcee
d 95
% c
apac
ity, w
ith a
def
icit o
f 31
plac
es. T
he q
uant
um o
f gro
wth
pr
opos
ed fo
r the
cat
chm
ent a
rea
does
not
war
rant
per
man
ent
expa
nsio
n of
the
catc
hmen
t sch
ool.
It is
expe
cted
that
the
addi
tiona
l pu
pils
eman
atin
g fro
m th
is de
velo
pmen
t wou
ld ta
ke p
riorit
y ov
er
child
ren
com
ing
from
out
of t
he c
atch
men
t are
a ov
er ti
me
via
appl
icatio
n of
the
adm
issio
ns p
olicy
(as a
t Oct
ober
201
9 c.3
9% o
f the
sc
hool
roll)
.
Agre
ed
Not
ed
Not
ed
Amen
d fir
st p
arag
raph
of L
axfie
ld: a
sh
ort h
istor
y as
follo
ws:
Laxf
ield
aro
se in
Sax
on ti
mes
and
Pr
ehist
oric
and
Rom
an fi
nds r
ecor
ded
from
the
paris
h, p
artic
ular
ly re
late
d to
th
e to
pogr
aphy
and
wat
erco
urse
s, hi
nts a
t ear
ly o
ccup
atio
n in
the
area
.; it
is kn
own
that
an
early
chu
rch
was
th
ere
and
the
villa
ge it
self
appe
ars i
n th
e Do
mes
day
Book
. In
1226
, Lax
field
w
as g
iven
cha
rter t
o ho
ld a
mar
ket.
106
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n It
is no
ted
that
issu
es a
roun
d pa
rkin
g ne
ar th
e sc
hool
hav
e be
en ra
ised
in T
IDI-2
, ASI
-2, a
nd C
omm
unity
Act
ion
21. T
he p
erm
itted
DC/
19/0
2312
La
nd o
n th
e So
uth
Side
of F
ram
lingh
am R
oad,
Lax
field
inclu
des
prov
ision
of c
ar p
arki
ng fa
ciliti
es fo
r the
scho
ol w
hich
shou
ld h
elp
to
alle
viat
e so
me
of th
e iss
ues a
roun
d pa
rkin
g ne
ar th
e sc
hool
. The
de
velo
pmen
t inc
lude
s a 1
7-sp
ace
car p
ark
for t
he sc
hool
and
17
spac
es
for v
isito
r par
king
for t
he d
evel
opm
ent a
nd a
dditi
onal
dro
p of
f spa
ces
for t
he sc
hool
. Se
cond
ary
Educ
atio
n
Stra
dbro
ke H
igh
Scho
ol is
the
catc
hmen
t pro
vide
r for
seco
ndar
y ed
ucat
ion,
with
a c
apac
ity o
f 435
pla
ces,
how
ever
for p
lann
ing
purp
oses
a
95%
cap
acity
is u
sed,
mak
ing
a to
tal o
f 413
pla
ces.
The
scho
ol is
cu
rrent
ly fo
reca
st to
exc
eed
95%
cap
acity
, with
a d
efici
t of 1
8 pl
aces
. Th
e qu
antu
m o
f gro
wth
pro
pose
d fo
r the
cat
chm
ent a
rea
does
not
w
arra
nt e
xpan
sion
of th
e sc
hool
. It i
s exp
ecte
d th
at th
e ad
ditio
nal p
upils
em
anat
ing
from
this
deve
lopm
ent w
ould
take
prio
rity
over
chi
ldre
n co
min
g fro
m o
ut o
f the
cat
chm
ent a
rea
over
tim
e vi
a ap
plica
tion
of th
e sc
hool
’s ad
miss
ions
pol
icy (a
s at O
ctob
er 2
018
c.26%
of t
he sc
hool
roll)
. Cu
rrent
ly, i
t is n
ot e
xpec
ted
that
Stra
dbro
ke H
igh
Scho
ol w
ill n
eed
to b
e ex
pand
ed, h
owev
er a
s the
Join
t Loc
al P
lan
proc
eeds
, thi
s will
be
kept
un
der r
evie
w. T
he In
frast
ruct
ure
Deliv
ery
Plan
for t
he Jo
int L
ocal
Pla
n in
dica
tes t
hat t
here
cou
ld b
e ex
pans
ion
for S
tradb
roke
Hig
h Sc
hool
, to
acco
mm
odat
e gr
owth
aris
ing
from
allo
cate
d ho
usin
g in
the
Join
t Loc
al
Plan
, if r
equi
red
in th
e fu
ture
. Lan
d fo
r fut
ure
poss
ible
exp
ansio
n ha
s be
en p
ropo
sed
in th
e St
radb
roke
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
with
in si
te
STRA
D16.
Fi
re a
nd R
escu
e
The
Suffo
lk F
ire &
Res
cue
Serv
ice (S
FRS)
has
con
sider
ed th
e pl
an a
nd
are
of th
e op
inio
n th
at, g
iven
the
leve
l of g
row
th p
ropo
sed,
we
do n
ot
envi
sage
add
ition
al se
rvice
pro
visio
n w
ill n
eed
to b
e m
ade
in o
rder
to
miti
gate
the
impa
ct. H
owev
er, t
his w
ill b
e re
cons
ider
ed if
serv
ice
cond
ition
s cha
nge.
As
alw
ays,
SFRS
wou
ld e
ncou
rage
the
prov
ision
of a
utom
ated
fire
su
ppre
ssio
n sp
rinkl
er sy
stem
s in
any
new
dev
elop
men
t as i
t not
onl
y af
ford
s enh
ance
d lif
e an
d pr
oper
ty p
rote
ctio
n bu
t if i
ncor
pora
ted
into
Not
ed
Not
ed
This
is no
t a m
atte
r of d
etai
l re
leva
nt to
pla
nnin
g po
licie
s but
107
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n th
e de
sign/
build
stag
e it
is ex
trem
ely
cost
effe
ctiv
e an
d ef
ficie
nt. S
FRS
will
not
hav
e an
y ob
ject
ion
with
rega
rd a
cces
s, as
long
as a
cces
s is i
n ac
cord
ance
with
bui
ldin
g re
gula
tion
guid
ance
. We
will
of c
ours
e w
ish to
ha
ve in
clude
d ad
equa
te w
ater
supp
lies f
or fi
refig
htin
g, sp
ecifi
c in
form
atio
n as
to th
e nu
mbe
r and
loca
tion
can
be o
btai
ned
from
our
w
ater
offi
cer v
ia th
e no
rmal
con
sulta
tion
proc
ess.
M
iner
als a
nd W
aste
SC
C is
the
min
eral
s and
was
te a
utho
rity
in S
uffo
lk. M
eani
ng, t
hat t
he
Coun
ty C
ounc
il is
resp
onsib
le fo
r mak
ing
loca
l pla
ns a
nd m
akin
g pl
anni
ng d
ecisi
ons w
ith re
gard
s to
min
eral
s and
was
te fa
ciliti
es. T
he
curre
nt p
lann
ing
docu
men
ts a
re th
e M
iner
als C
ore
Stra
tegy
and
the
Was
te C
ore
Stra
tegy
. It i
s exp
ecte
d th
at th
ese
docu
men
ts w
ill b
e re
plac
ed th
is ye
ar b
y th
e Su
ffolk
Min
eral
s and
Was
te L
ocal
Pla
n (S
MW
LP).
M
iner
al R
esou
rces
Saf
egua
rdin
g
The
Min
eral
s Cor
e St
rate
gy a
nd S
MW
LP in
clude
pol
icies
whi
ch
safe
guar
d m
iner
als r
esou
rces
from
bei
ng m
ade
inac
cess
ible
(ste
rilise
d)
by d
evel
opm
ent.
In S
uffo
lk m
iner
al re
sour
ces a
re m
ainl
y sa
nd a
nd
grav
el. L
ocat
ions
of r
esou
rces
are
show
n th
roug
h th
e M
iner
als
Cons
ulta
tion
Area
(MCA
). A
smal
l are
a of
the
paris
h is
cove
red
by th
e M
CA o
f the
em
ergi
ng S
MW
LP, t
o th
e w
est o
f the
par
ish fo
llow
ing
the
Rive
r Bly
th. I
t is n
ot e
xpec
ted
that
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
prop
osal
s w
ould
cau
se a
min
eral
s saf
egua
rdin
g iss
ue.
Min
eral
s and
Was
te F
acili
ties S
afeg
uard
ing
Bo
th th
e cu
rrent
pla
nnin
g do
cum
ents
and
em
ergi
ng S
MW
LP c
onta
in
polic
ies w
hich
pro
tect
exis
ting
was
te a
nd m
iner
al e
xtra
ctio
n fa
ciliti
es.
Ther
e is
a w
aste
wat
er tr
eatm
ent f
acili
ty in
the
paris
h, h
owev
er it
is n
ot
expe
cted
that
that
pla
n pr
opos
als w
ould
pre
judi
ce th
e op
erat
ion
of th
is fa
cility
. It
is su
gges
ted
that
ther
e co
uld
be re
fere
nce
to o
ther
stra
tegi
es th
at
supp
ort t
his N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n. T
his i
nclu
des S
uffo
lk C
ount
y Co
uncil
’s Gr
een
Acce
ss S
trate
gy (2
020-
2030
) ht
tps:/
/ww
w.su
ffolk
.gov
.uk/
asse
ts/c
ounc
il-an
d-
shou
ld b
e pi
cked
up
in th
e ap
plica
tion
of th
e Bu
ildin
g Re
gula
tions
. N
oted
N
oted
N
oted
N
oted
108
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n de
moc
racy
/con
sulta
tions
-pet
ition
s-an
d-el
ectio
ns/R
OW
IP-S
uffo
lk-
Gree
n-Ac
cess
-Stra
tegy
Th
is st
rate
gy se
ts o
ut th
e co
uncil
’s co
mm
itmen
t to
enha
nce
publ
ic rig
hts o
f way
, inc
ludi
ng n
ew li
nkag
es a
nd u
pgra
ding
rout
es w
here
ther
e is
a ne
ed. T
he st
rate
gy a
lso se
eks t
o im
prov
e ac
cess
for a
ll an
d to
su
ppor
t hea
lthy
and
sust
aina
ble
acce
ss b
etw
een
com
mun
ities
and
se
rvice
s thr
ough
dev
elop
men
t fun
ding
and
par
tner
ship
wor
king
. Ge
nera
l Co
nten
ts P
age:
the
num
berin
g do
es n
ot m
atch
rest
of d
ocum
ent.
Th
e Pa
rish
Wid
e Po
licie
s Map
doe
s not
app
ear t
o sh
ow a
ny p
olici
es,
only
the
paris
h bo
unda
ry a
nd th
e ar
ea o
f the
vill
age
cent
re in
set m
ap. I
t is
sugg
este
d th
at th
is Po
licy
Map
cou
ld d
ispla
y so
me
of th
e fe
atur
es
show
n in
the
Inse
t Map
. Pa
ragr
aph
12.5
: “ba
ck c
loth
ed” (
p60)
ple
ase
prov
ide
a de
finiti
on o
r ex
plan
atio
n.
Polic
y LA
X12:
par
ts a
) and
c) a
re re
peat
s, an
d it
reco
mm
ende
d th
at o
ne
of th
e po
ints
is re
mov
ed.
Appe
ndix
3 O
utst
andi
ng R
esid
entia
l Pla
nnin
g Pe
rmiss
ions
: ref
DC
/17/
0581
8/FU
L ha
s no
date
of a
ppro
val (
p72)
. I h
ope
that
thes
e co
mm
ents
are
hel
pful
. SCC
is a
lway
s will
ing
to d
iscus
s iss
ues o
r que
ries y
ou m
ay h
ave.
Som
e of
thes
e iss
ues m
ay b
e ad
dres
sed
Not
ed.
Ther
e ar
e no
pol
icy d
esig
natio
ns
that
spec
ifica
lly a
pply
to th
is ar
ea.
Not
ed
Agre
ed
The
perm
issio
n ha
s yet
to b
e iss
ued
by M
SDC
Not
ed
Amen
d Co
nten
ts p
age
to e
nsur
e pa
ge
num
bers
are
cor
rect
N
one
Amen
d th
ird se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph
12.5
as f
ollo
ws:
Whe
reve
r pos
sible
car
e sh
ould
be
take
n to
ens
ure
they
are
bac
k clo
thed
by
hav
e a
back
drop
of v
eget
atio
n Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 12
as f
ollo
ws:
Dele
te c
riter
ia c
. and
renu
mbe
r su
bseq
uent
crit
eria
acc
ordi
ngly
. N
one
109
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n by
the
SCC’
s Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lann
ing
Guid
ance
, whi
ch c
onta
ins
info
rmat
ion
rela
ting
to C
ount
y Co
uncil
serv
ice a
reas
and
link
s to
othe
r po
tent
ially
hel
pful
reso
urce
s. Th
e gu
idan
ce c
an b
e ac
cess
ed h
ere:
Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
nnin
g Gu
idan
ce.
M
Col
eman
The
peop
le in
volv
ed h
ere
have
wor
ked
tirel
essly
and
hav
e pr
epar
ed a
n ex
celle
nt d
raft.
Just
hop
e it
will
bec
ome
a re
ality
. Hug
e th
anks
to a
ll co
ncer
ned.
Than
k yo
u N
one
C Em
eny
M
y re
ason
s for
wan
ting
build
ing
next
to th
e O
ld P
olice
Sta
tion
are
as
follo
ws:-
1.
Chi
ldre
n co
uld
wal
k to
scho
ol fr
om th
at si
te
2. L
ess t
raffi
c 3.
Stra
ight
road
4.
It w
ould
brin
g th
e ce
met
ery
into
the
villa
ge c
entre
. Th
is is
a m
ust s
ite.
Not
ed. T
here
is n
o ne
ed a
t thi
s tim
e to
iden
tify
addi
tiona
l site
s to
mee
t the
hou
sing
requ
irem
ent
iden
tifie
d by
Mid
Suf
folk
Dist
rict
Coun
cil.
Non
e
LBry
dson
An im
pres
sive
and
com
preh
ensiv
e do
cum
ent
Than
k yo
u N
one
W T
hom
pson
You
have
all
done
rem
arka
ble
and
pain
stak
ing
wor
k ...
wha
t an
achi
evem
ent,
wel
l don
e!
Than
k yo
u N
one
G N
ason
Wel
l don
e!
Than
k yo
u N
one
C Em
eny
Tr
emen
dous
wor
k ha
s bee
n do
ne in
pul
ling
this
toge
ther
As
I kn
ow th
is is
the
docu
men
t tha
t will
be
amen
ded
befo
re su
bmiss
ion,
no
t tha
t the
pag
e nu
mbe
rs in
the
cont
ents
inde
x on
pag
e 5
are
wro
ng
and
need
to b
e co
rrect
ed b
efor
e su
bmitt
ing.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
J Alch
in
Th
e do
cum
ent i
s exc
elle
nt
It is
evid
ence
of a
sign
ifica
nt a
mou
nt o
f res
earc
h, ti
me
and
com
mitm
ent
by th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n Gr
oup.
It
is a
qual
ity d
ocum
ent t
hat s
houl
d be
ado
pted
, con
sider
ed a
nd
enha
nce
the
futu
re o
f our
vill
age.
Th
is do
cum
ent s
houl
d be
resp
ecte
d an
d hi
ghly
rega
rded
by
all r
elev
ant
parti
es.
Than
k yo
u N
one
M S
teve
ns
Th
at M
SDC
and
our e
lect
ed re
pres
enta
tive
at M
SDC
and
SCC
shou
ld b
e in
vite
d to
com
men
t and
whe
re t
hey
agre
e to
end
orse
this
draf
t pla
n fo
rthw
ith -
by th
e e
nd o
f the
con
sulta
tion
perio
d an
d to
supp
ort i
t's
futu
re i
mpl
emen
tatio
n.
MSD
C ar
e a
stat
utor
y co
nsul
tee
on
the
Plan
and
thei
r com
men
ts a
re
reco
rded
in th
is ta
ble.
Non
e
M W
illis
ot
her t
han
alre
ady
stat
ed
Not
ed
Non
e
110
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n R
Win
n
Than
k yo
u to
the
team
who
hav
e w
orke
d so
har
d to
pul
l thi
s tog
ethe
r. Cl
early
I'm
disa
ppoi
nted
that
out
line
plan
ning
per
miss
ion
was
gra
nted
to
the
larg
e de
velo
pmen
t opp
osite
the
scho
ol, e
ven
thou
gh it
was
kn
own
this
Plan
is so
clo
se to
fina
lisat
ion.
It's
a de
cisio
n th
at fl
ies i
n th
e fa
ce o
f eve
ryth
ing
said
in h
ere.
I do
n't b
elie
ve L
axfie
ld is
relu
ctan
t to
build
, gro
w, w
elco
me
and
mov
e fo
rwar
d. B
ut in
ord
er to
pro
tect
wha
t w
e ch
erish
, thi
s mus
t hap
pen
sust
aina
bly
and
colla
bora
tivel
y. Do
ne ri
ght,
this
coul
d be
a w
onde
rful o
ppor
tuni
ty fo
r our
com
mun
ity.
Let's
hop
e th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ha
s som
e re
al in
fluen
ce a
nd is
n't
simpl
y a
tickb
ox e
xerc
ise.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
G Ay
re
I w
ould
like
to th
ank
the
team
for a
ll of
the
hard
wor
k an
d vi
sion
that
ha
s gon
e in
to p
rodu
cing
the
draf
t Lax
field
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan.
We
hope
it p
rogr
esse
s suc
cess
fully
.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
J Wor
thin
gton
A va
luab
le to
ol fo
r the
com
mun
ity th
roug
h its
ele
cted
bod
y, th
e Pa
rish
Coun
cil (P
C) to
pla
n an
d m
anag
e th
e co
mm
uniti
es a
sset
s. Th
ank
you
Non
e
C Ca
woo
d
Than
k yo
u fo
r all
your
har
d w
ork
canv
assin
g op
inio
n an
d w
ritin
g th
e dr
aft p
lan.
Th
ank
you
Non
e
R Ca
pp
I t
hink
it is
a g
ood
all r
ound
doc
umen
t to
go fo
rwar
d w
ith
Than
k yo
u N
one
M B
laxil
l
TRAF
FIC
- 1)
As a
whe
elch
air u
ser,
I hav
e be
com
e ev
er m
ore
cons
cious
of t
he n
eed
for S
LOW
not
ices,
both
side
s to
be m
ade
befo
re tr
affic
turn
s the
cor
ner
by th
e Gu
ild H
all.
2) H
elp
with
Foo
tpat
hs c
an b
e gi
ven
by th
e Ra
mbl
ers A
ssoc
iatio
n. A
lde
Valle
y Gr
oup
wor
king
par
ty h
as d
one
wor
k in
Lax
field
for a
num
ber o
f ye
ars.
Not
ed
Non
e
S Pr
ende
rgas
t
A re
ally
thor
ough
pie
ce o
f wor
k. C
omm
enda
ble,
and
mus
t put
Lax
field
fo
rwar
d in
to a
mor
e po
sitiv
e fu
ture
. Th
ank
you
Non
e
K Du
nkle
y
I who
lehe
arte
dly
supp
ort t
he d
raft
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an in
its e
ntire
ty
and
appl
aud
the
dedi
catio
n an
d ha
rd w
ork
of a
ll th
ose
who
hav
e w
orke
d tir
eles
sly fo
r ove
r 3?
year
s to
brin
g it
to fr
uitio
n.
Than
k yo
u N
one
M G
odfre
y
We
fully
end
orse
the
initi
ative
s to
reta
in th
e ru
ral n
atur
e of
the
villa
ge;
we
parti
cula
rly su
ppor
t the
initi
ativ
e to
dev
elop
out
door
fitn
ess
equi
pmen
t on
the
play
ing
field
and
the
deve
lopm
ent o
f the
rura
l fo
otpa
ths.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
H Ev
ans
Co
ngra
tula
tions
to a
ll th
ose
invo
lved
for d
oing
such
a g
ood
job
Than
k yo
u N
one
111
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n W
Shu
ttle
Gr
eat p
iece
of w
ork.
Man
y th
anks
to a
ll in
the
team
that
hav
e de
vote
d so
muc
h tim
e an
d ef
fort
to d
evel
op it
. Th
ank
you
Non
e
Su
ffolk
Pr
eser
vatio
n So
ciety
Re: L
axfie
ld N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n –
Pre-
Subm
issio
n Co
nsul
tatio
n
I am
writ
ing
on b
ehal
f of t
he S
uffo
lk P
rese
rvat
ion
Socie
ty (S
PS),
the
only
co
unty
wid
e am
enity
socie
ty d
edica
ted
to p
rote
ctin
g an
d pr
omot
ing
the
spec
ial h
istor
ic an
d la
ndsc
ape
qual
ities
of S
uffo
lk. W
e al
so re
pres
ent t
he
Cam
paig
n fo
r the
Pro
tect
ion
of R
ural
Eng
land
in S
uffo
lk a
nd w
ork
close
ly w
ith p
arish
and
tow
n co
uncil
s and
oth
er b
odie
s who
shar
e ou
r ob
ject
ives
. As N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
ns o
ffer t
he o
ppor
tuni
ty fo
r pro
tect
ing
or im
prov
ing
the
herit
age
and
land
scap
e ch
arac
ter o
f an
area
and
pr
omot
ing
high
qua
lity
desig
n, S
PS a
re su
ppor
tive
of p
lans
bei
ng d
raw
n up
in S
uffo
lk, p
artic
ular
ly w
here
they
are
cen
tred
on h
istor
ic se
ttlem
ents
su
ch a
s Lax
field
, dist
inct
ive
for i
ts a
rchi
tect
ural
her
itage
and
land
scap
e qu
ality
. Ha
ving
read
the
draf
t pla
n w
e w
ould
like
to c
ongr
atul
ate
the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
team
on
the
exce
llent
doc
umen
t and
the
thor
ough
as
sess
men
t wor
k th
at h
as b
een
unde
rtake
n on
land
scap
e, d
esig
n an
d he
ritag
e. T
he su
ppor
ting
docu
men
tatio
n is
com
preh
ensiv
e an
d pr
ovid
es
a ro
bust
fram
ewor
k fo
r a ra
ft of
soun
d po
licie
s des
igne
d to
pro
tect
the
spec
ial q
ualit
ies o
f you
r par
ish. W
e ar
e pa
rticu
larly
ple
ased
to n
ote
the
inclu
sion
of sp
ecifi
c po
licie
s rel
atin
g to
Bui
ldin
gs o
f Loc
al S
igni
fican
ce
(LAX
8), H
erita
ge A
sset
s (LA
X9),
Dark
Ski
es (L
AX10
), De
sign
Cons
ider
atio
ns (L
AX11
) and
Pro
tect
ion
of L
ands
cape
Set
ting
(LAX
13).
We
also
wel
com
e bo
th C
omm
unity
Act
ion
poin
t (N
o.2)
, for
a w
orki
ng
grou
p to
wor
k on
a p
rogr
amm
e to
ens
ure
the
cons
erva
tion
of th
e hi
stor
ic fa
bric
of th
e Gu
ildha
ll, an
d Co
mm
unity
Act
ion
poin
t (N
o 3)
, for
a
wor
king
gro
up to
car
ry o
ut fu
rther
wor
k to
def
ine
Desig
n Gu
idel
ines
. Bo
th o
f the
se p
roje
cts w
ill m
ake
a sig
nific
ant c
ontri
butio
n th
roug
h th
e pr
otec
tion
of h
ighl
y im
porta
nt h
erita
ge a
sset
s, w
hich
con
tribu
te to
the
qual
ity a
nd c
hara
cter
of t
he v
illag
e, a
nd th
roug
h en
surin
g th
at th
e id
entif
ied
arch
itect
ural
cha
ract
er a
nd q
ualit
y of
the
built
env
ironm
ent i
s pr
otec
ted
and
that
futu
re d
evel
opm
ent s
afeg
uard
s it.
W
e fu
lly su
ppor
t the
exc
elle
nt w
ork
of th
e N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n te
am in
de
velo
ping
a ro
bust
rang
e of
pol
icies
to sa
fegu
ard
the
land
scap
e an
d he
ritag
e of
its p
arish
.
Not
ed a
nd T
hank
you
N
one
112
Nam
e Gr
oup
/ O
rgan
isat
ion
Com
men
ts (a
s su
bmitt
ed)
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
Resp
onse
Ch
ange
s mad
e to
Pla
n
East
Suf
folk
Dr
aina
ge B
oard
RE
: Lax
field
(Suf
folk
) Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
– Pr
e-Su
bmiss
ion
Cons
ulta
tion
(Reg
ulat
ion
14) T
he si
te is
nea
r to
the
Inte
rnal
Dra
inag
e Di
stric
t (ID
D) o
f the
Eas
t Suf
folk
Inte
rnal
Dra
inag
e Bo
ard
(IDB)
and
th
eref
ore
the
Boar
d’s B
yela
ws a
pply
. A c
opy
of th
e Bo
ard'
s Bye
law
s can
be
acc
esse
d on
our
web
site
(http
s://w
ww
.wlm
a.or
g.uk
/upl
oads
/ESI
DB_B
yela
ws.p
df),
alon
g w
ith m
aps
of th
e ID
D (h
ttps:/
/ww
w.w
lma.
org.
uk/u
ploa
ds/E
SIDB
_Inde
x_pl
an.p
df).
Thes
e m
aps a
lso sh
ow w
hich
wat
erco
urse
s hav
e be
en d
esig
nate
d as
'A
dopt
ed W
ater
cour
ses'
by th
e Bo
ard.
The
ado
ptio
n of
a w
ater
cour
se is
an
ack
now
ledg
emen
t by
the
Boar
d th
at th
e w
ater
cour
se is
of a
rteria
l im
porta
nce
to th
e ID
D an
d as
such
will
nor
mal
ly re
ceiv
e m
aint
enan
ce
from
the
IDB.
In o
rder
to a
void
con
flict
bet
wee
n th
e pl
anni
ng p
roce
ss
and
the
Boar
d's r
egul
ator
y re
gim
e an
d co
nsen
ting
proc
ess p
leas
e be
aw
are
of th
e fo
llow
ing:
Sho
uld
any
deve
lopm
ent p
ropo
se to
disc
harg
e su
rface
wat
er to
a w
ater
cour
se w
ithin
the
IDD
(dire
ctly
or i
ndire
ctly
), th
e pr
opos
ed d
evel
opm
ent w
ill re
quire
land
dra
inag
e co
nsen
t in
line
with
the
Boar
d’s b
yela
ws (
spec
ifica
lly b
yela
w 3
). An
y co
nsen
t gra
nted
w
ill li
kely
be
cond
ition
al, p
endi
ng th
e pa
ymen
t of a
Sur
face
Wat
er
Deve
lopm
ent C
ontri
butio
n fe
e, c
alcu
late
d in
line
with
the
Boar
d’s
char
ging
pol
icy.
(http
s://w
ww
.wlm
a.or
g.uk
/upl
oads
/WM
A_Ta
ble_
of_C
harg
es_a
nd_F
ees.p
df).
Whi
lst th
e co
nsen
ting
proc
ess a
s set
out
und
er th
e La
nd D
rain
age
Act 1
991
and
the
afor
emen
tione
d By
elaw
s are
sepa
rate
from
pla
nnin
g,
the
abili
ty to
impl
emen
t a p
lann
ing
perm
issio
n m
ay b
e de
pend
ent o
n th
e gr
antin
g of
thes
e co
nsen
ts. A
s suc
h w
e st
rong
ly re
com
men
d th
at
any
requ
ired
cons
ent i
s sou
ght p
rior t
o de
term
inat
ion
of a
pla
nnin
g ap
plica
tion.
Not
ed
Non
e
113
Appe
ndix
7 -
Sche
dule
of C
hang
es fo
llow
ing
the
Regu
latio
n 14
Pre
-Sub
mis
sion
Con
sulta
tion
Stag
e De
letio
ns a
re st
ruck
thro
ugh
eg d
elet
ion
Ad
ditio
ns a
re u
nder
lined
eg
addi
tion
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
Co
ver
Am
end
as fo
llow
s: Pr
e-Su
bmiss
ion
Draf
t Fe
brua
ry Ju
ne 2
020
To b
ring
the
Plan
up-
to-d
ate
3 Se
cond
par
agra
ph
Amen
d pa
ragr
aph
as fo
llow
s: Th
is fir
st d
raft
of th
e La
xfie
ld N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n ha
s bee
n pr
epar
ed b
y a
team
of P
arish
Co
uncil
lors
and
vol
unte
ers.
Know
n as
the
first
dra
ft of
the
Subm
issio
n Dr
aft N
eigh
bour
hood
Pla
n,
know
n as
the
“Pre
-Sub
miss
ion
Plan
”, w
hich
is b
eing
con
sulte
d on
for a
per
iod
of si
x w
eeks
. At t
he e
nd
of th
e co
nsul
tatio
n, c
omm
ents
rece
ived
will
be
revi
ewed
and
any
nec
essa
ry a
men
dmen
ts to
the
Plan
w
ill b
e m
ade
ahea
d of
it b
eing
subm
itted
to M
id S
uffo
lk D
istric
t Cou
ncil
it w
as su
bjec
t to
publ
ic co
nsul
tatio
n be
twee
n 22
nd F
ebru
ary
2020
to M
onda
y 6th
Apr
il 20
20 (i
nclu
sive)
. Fol
low
ing
that
co
nsul
tatio
n, a
men
dmen
ts h
ave
been
mad
e in
resp
onse
to c
omm
ents
rece
ived
and
the
Plan
has
bee
n br
ough
t up-
to-d
ate.
It h
as n
ow b
een
subm
itted
to M
id S
uffo
lk D
istric
t Cou
ncil
for f
urth
er c
onsu
ltatio
n an
d th
en e
xam
inat
ion
by a
n in
depe
nden
t exa
min
er. F
ollo
win
g th
e ex
amin
atio
n, a
nd su
bjec
t to
the
exam
iner
and
Dist
rict C
ounc
il’s a
ppro
val,
a re
fere
ndum
of r
esid
ents
will
be
held
to v
ote
on w
heth
er th
e Pl
an sh
ould
be
used
by
Mid
Suf
folk
Dist
rict C
ounc
il w
hen
decid
ing
plan
ning
app
licat
ions
. an
d it
has n
ow re
ache
d th
e fo
rmal
“pre
-sub
miss
ion”
con
sulta
tion
stag
e of
the
form
al p
repa
ratio
n pr
oces
s. At
the
end
of th
e co
nsul
tatio
n pe
riod,
all
subm
itted
co
mm
ents
will
be
cons
ider
ed a
nd th
e Pl
an w
ill b
e am
ende
d w
here
nec
essa
ry. T
he
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan
will
then
be
subm
itted
to M
id S
uffo
lk D
istric
t Cou
ncil
for a
furth
er
roun
d of
con
sulta
tion,
follo
wed
by
an e
xam
inat
ion
by a
n In
depe
nden
t Exa
min
er a
nd, i
f ap
prov
ed, a
vill
age
refe
rend
um.
To b
ring
the
Plan
up-
to-d
ate
5 Co
nten
ts
Cont
ents
to b
e up
date
d to
inclu
de C
omm
unity
Act
ions
as a
ttach
ed to
the
end
of th
is sc
hedu
le.
In
resp
onse
to c
omm
ents
9 Ke
y M
ilest
ones
Am
end
tabl
e as
follo
ws:
To b
ring
the
Plan
up-
to-d
ate
114
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
Pr
e-su
bmiss
ion
draf
t NP
Docu
men
t app
rove
d by
Par
ish C
ounc
il Ja
n 20
20
Pre-
Subm
issio
n Pl
an S
tatu
tory
Con
sulta
tion
(6-w
eek
perio
d) Q
1 20
20 F
eb-A
pr 2
020
Subm
issio
n of
revi
sed
NP
to M
SDC
Q2
2020
June
202
0 Su
bmiss
ion
Plan
con
sulta
tion
by M
SDC
(min
imum
6-w
eek
perio
d) Q
2 20
20 Q
3 20
20
Inde
pend
ent e
xam
inat
ion
Q3
2020
M
SDC
decid
e to
cal
l ref
eren
dum
Q3
2020
Q4
2020
Re
fere
ndum
Q3
2020
May
202
1 *
Inse
rt be
low
tabl
e:
Un
der C
ovid
-19
rest
rictio
ns, t
he G
over
nmen
t has
cur
rent
ly p
ostp
oned
all
neig
hbou
rhoo
d pl
an
refe
rend
ums u
ntil
May
202
1
6 La
xfie
ld: a
shor
t hi
stor
y Am
end
first
par
agra
ph o
f “La
xfie
ld: a
shor
t hist
ory”
as f
ollo
ws:
Laxf
ield
aro
se in
Sax
on ti
mes
and
Pre
hist
oric
and
Rom
an fi
nds r
ecor
ded
from
the
paris
h, p
artic
ular
ly
rela
ted
to th
e to
pogr
aphy
and
wat
erco
urse
s, hi
nts a
t ear
ly o
ccup
atio
n in
the
area
.; it i
s kno
wn
that
an
early
chu
rch
was
ther
e an
d th
e vi
llage
itse
lf ap
pear
s in
the
Dom
esda
y Bo
ok. I
n 12
26, L
axfie
ld w
as g
iven
ch
arte
r to
hold
a m
arke
t.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
12
HDI-5
Am
end
HDI-5
as f
ollo
ws:
New
dev
elop
men
ts sh
ould
aim
to b
e co
mpa
ct, c
onsid
er sh
ared
par
king
and
gre
en a
men
ities
, min
imise
th
e vi
sual
impa
ct o
f car
par
king
, int
egra
te w
ith su
rroun
ding
nei
ghbo
urho
ods a
nd o
pen
spac
e, a
nd
bala
nce
priv
acy
and
com
mun
ity.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
26
8.7
Amen
d th
e la
st se
nten
ce o
f Par
a 8.
7 as
follo
ws:
For g
roup
s of f
our o
r mor
e un
its, s
hare
d am
enity
or p
arki
ng sp
ace
shou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
. Pro
posa
ls sh
ould
also
seek
to m
inim
ise th
e vi
sual
impa
ct o
f car
par
king
on
the
char
acte
r of t
he a
rea.
Am
end
HDI-5
as f
ollo
ws:
New
dev
elop
men
ts sh
ould
aim
to b
e co
mpa
ct, c
onsid
er sh
ared
par
king
and
gre
en a
men
ities
, min
imise
th
e vi
sual
impa
ct o
f car
par
king
, int
egra
te w
ith su
rroun
ding
nei
ghbo
urho
ods a
nd o
pen
spac
e, a
nd
bala
nce
priv
acy
and
com
mun
ity.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
115
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
26
8.
8 Am
end
first
sent
ence
of p
arag
raph
8.8
as f
ollo
ws:
With
in th
e 20
18 A
dopt
ed L
ocal
Pla
n Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary
ther
e ar
e no
cle
ared
site
s for
dev
elop
men
ts
of fo
ur o
r mor
e dw
ellin
gs.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
26
8.9
Amen
d pa
ragr
aph
8.9
as fo
llow
s: H
ousi
ng D
evel
opm
ent
8.9
Hous
ing
Deve
lopm
ent.
A ke
y ro
le o
f the
Nei
ghbo
urho
od P
lan…
……
…..
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
28
Polic
y LA
X 3
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
3 as
follo
ws:
A sit
e of
0.3
2 he
ctar
es e
ast o
f Mill
Roa
d, a
s ide
ntifi
ed o
n M
ap 4
and
on
the
Polic
ies M
ap, i
s allo
cate
d fo
r fo
ur, t
hree
bed
room
ed b
unga
low
s with
acc
ess f
rom
Mill
Roa
d.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
29
Polic
y LA
X 4
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
4 as
follo
ws:
A sit
e of
0.7
1 he
ctar
es e
ast o
f Mill
Roa
d, a
s ide
ntifi
ed o
n M
ap 5
and
on
the
Polic
ies M
ap, i
s allo
cate
d fo
r th
irtee
n dw
ellin
gs in
cludi
ng fo
ur a
fford
able
hom
es.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
34
Polic
y LA
X 7
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
7 as
follo
ws:
All n
ew d
wel
lings
shal
l ach
ieve
app
ropr
iate
inte
rnal
spac
e th
roug
h ad
here
nce
to th
e la
test
N
atio
nally
Des
crib
ed S
pace
Sta
ndar
ds. P
ropo
sals
to d
eliv
er n
ew re
siden
tial d
evel
opm
ent t
o Lif
etim
e Ho
mes
stan
dard
s tha
t is a
dapt
able
to B
uild
ing
Regu
latio
ns M
(4)2
stan
dard
s in
orde
r to
mee
t th
e ne
eds o
f the
incr
easin
gly
agei
ng a
nd fr
ail p
opul
atio
n w
ithou
t res
trict
ing
the
need
s of y
oung
fam
ilies
w
ill b
e st
rong
ly su
ppor
ted.
In
add
ition
, ins
ert s
pace
bet
wee
n fir
st a
nd se
cond
sent
ence
and
rem
ove
char
acte
r spa
ce in
“stro
ngly
”
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
35
9.2
Amen
d se
cond
sent
ence
of p
arag
raph
9.2
as f
ollo
ws:
A ke
y fe
atur
e of
the
hist
oric
core
(see
Map
6 7
) is t
hat a
lthou
gh th
e pa
ttern
s is c
onsid
ered
that
of a
lin
ear v
illag
e,…
..
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
38
9.7
Amen
d fir
st se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph 9
.7 a
s fol
low
s: …
……
iden
tifie
s fou
r key
s vie
ws i
n th
e se
ttlem
ent o
f Lax
field
, whi
ch w
e fu
rther
sum
mar
ise a
s fol
low
s:
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
116
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
41
M
ap 8
Am
end
Map
8 a
nd p
rece
ding
pho
tos t
o pr
ovid
e a
link,
whe
re a
ppro
pria
te, b
etw
een
the
view
pho
tos
and
the
map
.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
42
9.9
Amen
d pa
ragr
aph
9.9
as fo
llow
s: Su
ffolk
Cou
nty
Coun
cil’s
Hist
oric
Envi
ronm
ent R
ecor
d (H
ER) p
rovi
des d
etai
ls of
arc
haeo
logi
cal a
nd
hist
oric
sites
and
bui
ldin
gs a
nd fi
nds,
and
the
Arch
aeol
ogica
l Ser
vice
shou
ld b
e co
nsul
ted
at th
e ea
rlies
t po
ssib
le st
ages
of p
repa
ring
a pl
anni
ng a
pplic
atio
n. T
he p
ublic
ver
sion
of th
e HE
R ca
n be
vie
wed
onl
ine
thro
ugh
the
Suffo
lk H
erita
ge E
xplo
rer.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
43
9.11
Am
end
seco
nd se
nten
ce o
f Par
a 9.
11 a
s fol
low
s: In
sert
full-
stop
afte
r ‘te
rm’ a
nd st
art n
ew se
nten
ce w
ith “W
ork
also
…”
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
44-4
5 Po
licy
LAX
11
Amen
d Po
licy
LAX
11 a
s fol
low
s: a.
reco
gnise
and
add
ress
the
key
feat
ures
, cha
ract
erist
ics, l
ands
cape
/bui
ldin
g ch
arac
ter,
loca
l di
stin
ctiv
enes
s and
spec
ial q
ualit
ies o
f the
are
a an
d/or
bui
ldin
g as
iden
tifie
d in
the
Built
Cha
ract
er
Asse
ssm
ent a
nd, w
here
nec
essa
ry o
n sit
es lo
cate
d ou
tsid
e th
e Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary,
prep
are
a la
ndsc
ape
char
acte
r app
raisa
l to
dem
onst
rate
this;
b.
mai
ntai
n or
cre
ate
the
villa
ge’s
sens
e of
pla
ce a
nd/o
r loc
al c
hara
cter
avo
idin
g, w
here
pos
sible
, cul
-de
-sac
dev
elop
men
ts w
hich
do
not r
efle
ct th
e la
ne h
iera
rchy
and
form
of t
he se
ttlem
ent;
c. d
o no
t inv
olve
the
loss
of g
arde
ns, i
mpo
rtant
ope
n, g
reen
or l
ands
cape
d ar
eas o
r the
ero
sion
of th
e se
ttlem
ent g
aps i
dent
ified
on
the
Polic
ies M
ap, w
hich
mak
e a
posit
ive
signi
fican
t con
tribu
tion
to th
e ch
arac
ter o
f tha
t par
t of t
he v
illag
e;
d. “…
taki
ng m
itiga
tion
mea
sure
s int
o ac
coun
t, do
not
affe
ct a
dver
sely
resu
lt in
a si
gnifi
cant
adv
erse
ef
fect
on;
” i.
“any
the
hist
oric
char
acte
r, ar
chite
ctur
al o
r arc
haeo
logi
cal h
erita
ge a
sset
s…”
f. pr
oduc
e de
signs
that
refle
ct th
e ch
arac
ter,
scal
e, h
eigh
t and
den
sity
of th
e lo
calit
y;
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
117
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
g.
pro
duce
des
igns
, in
acco
rdan
ce w
ith st
anda
rds,
that
mai
ntai
n or
enh
ance
the
safe
ty o
f the
hig
hway
ne
twor
k en
surin
g th
at a
ll ap
prop
riate
veh
icle
park
ing
is pr
ovid
ed w
ithin
the
plot
, a p
ropo
rtion
of
park
ing
is pr
ovid
ed o
n st
reet
but
is w
ell d
esig
ned,
loca
ted
and
inte
grat
ed in
to th
e sc
hem
e to
avo
id
obst
ruct
ion
to a
ll hi
ghw
ay u
sers
and
visi
bilit
y se
ek a
lway
s to
ensu
re p
erm
eabi
lity
thro
ugh
new
hou
sing
area
s, co
nnec
ting
any
new
dev
elop
men
t int
o th
e he
art o
f the
exis
ting
settl
emen
t, pr
iorit
ising
the
mov
emen
t of p
edes
trian
s and
cyc
lists
; i.
do n
ot re
sult
in w
ater
run-
off t
hat w
ould
add
to o
r cre
ate
surfa
ce w
ater
floo
ding
; and
shal
l inc
lude
the
use
of a
bove
-gro
und
open
Sus
tain
able
Dra
inag
e Sy
stem
s (Su
DS).
Thes
e co
uld
inclu
de w
etla
nd a
nd
othe
r wat
er fe
atur
es, w
hich
can
hel
p re
duce
floo
d ris
k w
hilst
offe
ring
othe
r ben
efits
inclu
ding
wat
er
qual
ity, a
men
ity/r
ecre
atio
nal a
reas
, and
bio
dive
rsity
ben
efits
46
9.17
Am
end
para
grap
h 9.
17 a
s fol
low
s: Br
oade
r sus
tain
abili
ty c
once
rns a
lso n
eed
to b
e ad
dres
sed
with
in c
onst
ruct
ion
proj
ects
, inc
ludi
ng (b
ut
not l
imite
d to
) wat
er, m
ater
ials,
reso
urce
effi
cienc
y an
d bi
odiv
ersit
y as
wel
l as t
he e
cono
mic
and
socia
l co
ncer
ns d
iscus
sed
in so
me
of th
e ot
her a
reas
of t
his P
lan.
Mea
sure
s tha
t red
uce
wat
er u
sage
inclu
ding
re
cycli
ng w
ill b
e su
ppor
ted
and
whe
re S
usta
inab
le D
rain
age
Syst
ems a
re im
plem
ente
d, d
esig
ns sh
ould
se
ek to
mim
ic th
e na
tura
l env
ironm
ent,
and
prov
ide
amen
ity a
nd b
iodi
vers
ity b
enef
its.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts
46
Polic
y LA
X 12
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 12
as f
ollo
ws:
Dele
te c
riter
ia c
. and
renu
mbe
r sub
sequ
ent c
riter
ia a
ccor
ding
ly.
e.
inco
rpor
ate
sust
aina
ble
desig
n an
d co
nstru
ctio
n m
easu
res a
nd e
nerg
y ef
ficie
ncy
mea
sure
s in
cludi
ng, w
here
feas
ible
, gro
und/
air s
ourc
e he
at p
umps
, pho
tovo
ltaics
, sol
ar p
anel
s and
gre
y w
ater
re
cycli
ng a
nd ra
inw
ater
and
stor
mw
ater
har
vest
ing.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
50
Polic
y LA
X 13
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 13
iii)
as fo
llow
s: iii
) w
ill n
ot h
ave
a de
trim
enta
l im
pact
on
the
key
feat
ures
of t
he im
porta
nt v
iew
s ide
ntifi
ed o
n th
e Po
licie
s Map
.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
51
Polic
y LA
X 14
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 14
by
addi
ng th
e fo
llow
ing
addi
tiona
l crit
erio
n to
the
end:
d)
the
inclu
sion
of sw
ift b
ricks
and
/or b
at b
oxes
with
in n
ew b
uild
ings
.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
118
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
52
Polic
y LA
X 15
Am
end
Polic
y LA
X 15
as f
ollo
ws:
5. F
ield
beh
ind
Chur
ch W
alk
on le
ft of
Gor
am M
ill L
ane
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
53
11.1
Am
end
fifth
bul
let p
oint
as f
ollo
ws:
Sh
elte
red,
Ret
irem
ent a
nd S
uppo
rted
Livin
g Ac
com
mod
atio
n w
ith a
Disp
ensin
g Ph
arm
acy
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
54
11.4
Am
end
first
sent
ence
as f
ollo
ws:
11.4
All
Sain
ts C
hurc
h of
Eng
land
Chu
rch
is pa
rt of
the
Four
Riv
ers L
axfie
ld a
nd W
orlin
gwor
th B
enef
ice.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
54
11.6
Am
end
third
sent
ence
of p
arag
raph
11.
6 as
follo
ws:
This
is al
so th
e sit
e fo
r a d
ispen
sing
phar
mac
y av
aila
ble
to v
illag
e re
siden
ts a
s wel
l as H
arte
smer
e Ho
use
resid
ents
; it i
s also
the
loca
tion
for t
he v
isitin
g M
obile
Lib
rary
.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
55
11.1
3
Amen
d fin
al se
nten
ce a
s fol
low
s: Th
e pa
vilio
n is
used
by
the
Horti
cultu
ral S
ocie
ty a
long
side
its g
ener
al u
se.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
60
Polic
y LA
X 18
Amen
d th
e fir
st se
nten
ce o
f Pol
icy L
AX 1
8 as
follo
ws:
Prop
osal
s for
new
bus
ines
s dev
elop
men
t will
be
supp
orte
d w
here
site
s are
loca
ted
with
in th
e Se
ttlem
ent B
ound
ary
iden
tifie
d on
the
Polic
ies M
ap, w
here
they
wou
ld n
ot h
ave
an u
nacc
epta
ble
impa
ct o
n re
siden
tial a
men
ity, h
erita
ge a
sset
s, an
d th
e hi
ghw
ays n
etw
ork
high
way
safe
ty, o
r the
re
sidua
l cum
ulat
ive
impa
cts o
n th
e ro
ad n
etw
ork
wou
ld b
e se
vere
.
60
12.5
Am
end
third
sent
ence
as f
ollo
ws:
Whe
reve
r pos
sible
car
e sh
ould
be
take
n to
ens
ure
they
are
bac
k clo
thed
by
have
a b
ackd
rop
of
vege
tatio
n
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
62
13.2
Am
end
Para
grap
h 13
.2 a
s fol
low
s: Th
ere
are
four
ent
ranc
es to
the
villa
ge –
the
two
prin
cipal
gat
eway
s (nu
mbe
red
1 an
d 3
on th
e m
ap a
nd
in th
e ph
otog
raph
s bel
ow) a
re o
n th
e m
ain
rout
e th
roug
h th
e vi
llage
, the
B11
17.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
119
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
N
umbe
r pho
tos a
s fol
low
s: 1.
Sta
tion
Road
(eas
t bou
nd v
iew
) 2.
Bick
ers H
ill R
oad
(wes
t bou
nd v
iew
) 3.
Vica
rage
Roa
d (w
est b
ound
vie
w)
4. F
ram
lingh
am R
oad
(eas
t bou
nd v
iew
)
63
13.6
Am
end
seco
nd se
nten
ce o
f par
agra
ph 1
3.6
as fo
llow
s: Gi
ven
the
gene
ral i
ncre
ase
in tr
affic
, inc
ludi
ng la
rge
agric
ultu
ral v
ehicl
es, t
rave
lling
thro
ugh
the
villa
ge,
this
is po
tent
ially
ver
y da
nger
ous.
; The
re h
ave
alre
ady
been
incid
ents
whe
re c
ars r
ever
sing
away
from
th
e Co
-op
have
bac
ked
into
car
s par
ked
acro
ss th
e ro
ad.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
65
Com
mun
ity A
ctio
n 23
Am
end
as fo
llow
s: En
hanc
e an
d en
forc
e Sp
eedi
ng sp
eed
limits
and
impr
ove
road
safe
ty, w
orki
ng w
ith th
e re
leva
nt
auth
oriti
es.
To c
orre
ct g
ram
mat
ical e
rror
66
14.3
Am
end
para
grap
h 14
.3 a
s fol
low
s: Th
e Pa
rish
Coun
cil w
ill m
onito
r the
Pla
n at
leas
t ann
ually
to e
nsur
e th
at it
rem
ains
rele
vant
and
ap
prop
riate
giv
en c
hang
es to
Loc
al a
nd N
atio
nal P
lann
ing
Polic
y an
d w
ill re
port
the
outc
ome
to P
arish
re
siden
ts.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
68
Villa
ge C
entre
Inse
t M
ap
Amen
d Vi
llage
Cen
tre In
set M
ap to
iden
tify
Settl
emen
t Gap
s In
resp
onse
to c
omm
ents
rece
ived
69
Appe
ndix
1 Am
end
Appe
ndix
1 by
inse
rting
the
follo
win
g te
xt a
fter t
he ti
tle:
The
info
rmat
ion
in th
is ap
pend
ix w
as c
orre
ct a
t the
tim
e of
writ
ing
this
Plan
. Up
to d
ate
info
rmat
ion
shou
ld b
e so
ught
from
Hist
oric
Engl
and
or M
id S
uffo
lk D
istric
t Cou
ncil.
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
70
Appe
ndix
2 Am
end
Appe
ndix
2, p
oint
8 a
s fol
low
s: 8.
Brid
ge H
ouse
, Gor
ams M
ill L
ane
(Brid
ge S
treet
) –
In re
spon
se to
com
men
ts re
ceiv
ed
120
Page
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
Para
No
/ Pol
icy
in P
re-
Subm
issi
on
Cons
ulta
tion
Plan
M
odifi
catio
n Re
ason
En
d of
Pla
n
Inse
rt Gl
ossa
ry a
s set
out
in p
ages
follo
win
g th
is ta
ble
In
resp
onse
to c
omm
ents
rece
ived
121
Contents Page Modification
Community ActionsCommunity Action 1 – Community Land Trust 32
Community Action 2 – Guildhall Preservation and Improvements 43
Community Action 3 – Laxfield Design Guidelines 45
Community Action 4 – Sustainable Design and Construction Best Practice 46
Community Action 5 – Footpath and Cyclepaths Working Group 52
Community Action 6 – Local Greenways 52
Community Action 7 – Community Green Space 52
Community Action 8 – Green Laxfield 52
Community Action 9 – Wildflower Meadows 52
Community Action 10 – The Sports Pavilion 57
Community Action 11 – The Playing Field 58
Community Action 12 – Dementia Friendly Laxfield 58
Community Action 13 – Young People’s Sport and Recreation 58
Community Action 14 – Laxfield Museum 58
Community Action 15 – Infrastructure Investment Plan 58
Community Action 16 – Small Businesses and Makers 61
Community Action 17 – The Local Economy 61
Community Action 18 – Safe Routes for Active Travel 64
Community Action 19 – Walking and Cycling 64
Community Action 20 – Car Sharing 64
Community Action 21 – Car Parking Improvements 64
Community Action 22 – Business Parking and Deliveries 65
Community Action 23 – Speed and Road Safety 65
Community Action 24 – Central Goods Delivery and Distribution 65
Community Action 25 – Quiet Lanes Project 65
122
Glossary Affordable housing: Social rented, affordable rented and intermediate housing, provided to eligible households whose needs are not met by the market. Eligibility is determined with regard to local incomes and local house prices. The definition also includes “starter homes”.
Archaeological interest: There will be archaeological interest in a heritage asset if it holds, or potentially may hold, evidence of past human activity worthy of expert investigation at some point. Heritage assets with archaeological interest are the primary source of evidence about the substance and evolution of places, and of the people and cultures that made them.
Biodiversity: Describes the range and variety of living organisms within an ecosystem. It can include all living organisms, plants, animals, fungi and bacteria and is often used to indicate the richness or number of species in an area. Such an area can be defined at different levels across the globe or be limited to a local area such as a parish.
Building of Local Significance: Locally important building valued for its contribution to the local scene or for local historical situations but not meriting listed status.
Conservation (for Heritage Policy): The process of maintaining and managing change to a heritage asset in a way that sustains and, where appropriate, enhances its significance.
Community Infrastructure Levy: A levy allowing local authorities to raise funds from owners or developers of land undertaking new building projects in their area.
Development Plan: This includes adopted Local Plans and Neighbourhood Plans as defined in section 38 of the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004.
Green infrastructure: A network of multi-functional green space, urban and rural, which is capable of delivering a wide range of environmental and quality of life benefits for local communities.
Habitat: The natural home of an animal or plant often designated as an area of nature conservation interest.
Heritage asset: A term that includes designated heritage assets (e.g. listed buildings, world heritage sites, conservation areas, scheduled monuments, protected wreck sites, registered parks and gardens and battlefields) and non-designated assets identified by the local planning authority. Non-designated heritage assets include sites of archaeological interest, buildings, structures or features of local heritage interest listed by, or fulfilling criteria for listing by, the local planning authority.
Hinterland Village: Defined in the Babergh Core Strategy (2014) as villages that tend to be small, with very limited facilities and so are dependent on nearby larger villages or urban areas for many of their everyday needs.
Historic environment: All aspects of the environment resulting from the interaction between people and places through time, including all surviving physical remains of past human activity, whether visible, buried or submerged, and landscaped and planted or managed flora.
Infrastructure: The basic physical and organisational structures and facilities (e.g. buildings, roads and power supplies) necessary for development to take place.
International, national and locally designated sites of importance for biodiversity: All international sites (Special Areas of Conservation, Special Protection Areas, and Ramsar sites), national sites (Sites of Special Scientific Interest) and locally designated sites including Local Wildlife Sites.
Local planning authority: The public authority whose duty it is to carry out specific planning functions for a particular area which in this case is Babergh District Council.
Local Plan: The plan for the future development of the district, drawn up by the local planning authority in consultation with the community.
Neighbourhood Area: The Neighbourhood Area is that which the Neighbourhood Plan covers. It normally covers a whole parish and is formally designated by the local planning authority upon request of the Parish Council.
Neighbourhood Plan: A plan prepared by a Parish Council or Neighbourhood Forum for a particular Neighbourhood Area (made under the Planning and Compulsory Purchase Act 2004).
Open space: All open space of public value, including not just land, but also areas of water (such as rivers, canals,
123
lakes and reservoirs) which offer important opportunities for sport and recreation and can act as a visual amenity.
Renewable and low carbon energy: Includes energy for heating and cooling as well as generating electricity. Renewable energy covers those energy flows that occur naturally and repeatedly in the environment – from the wind, the fall of water, the movement of the oceans, from the sun and also from biomass and deep geothermal heat. Low carbon technologies are those that can help reduce emissions (compared to conventional use of fossil fuels).
Rural exception sites for affordable housing: Sites for affordable housing development in rural locations where market housing would not normally be acceptable because of planning policy constraints. Homes can be brought forward on these sites only if there is a proven unmet local need for affordable housing and a legal planning agreement is in place to ensure that the homes will always remain affordable, will be for people in housing need and prioritised for those with a strong local connection to the Parish.
Setting of a heritage asset: The surroundings in which a heritage asset is experienced. Its extent is not fixed and may change as the asset and its surroundings evolve. Elements of a setting may make a positive or negative contribution to the significance of an asset, may affect the ability to appreciate that significance or may be neutral.
Significance (for heritage policy): The value of a heritage asset to this and future generations because of its heritage interest. That interest may be archaeological, architectural, artistic or historic. Significance derives not only from a heritage asset’s physical presence, but also from its setting.
Site of Special Scientific Interest: Sites designated by Natural England under the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981.
Starter Homes: The Housing and Planning Act 2016 provides the statutory framework for the delivery of starter homes. The Act defines starter homes as new homes costing up to £250,000 (£450,000 in London), to be available at a minimum 20% discount on market value to eligible first-time buyers.
Strategic Environmental Assessment: A procedure (set out in the Environmental Assessment of Plans and Programmes Regulations 2004 as amended) which requires the formal environmental assessment of certain plans and programmes which are likely to have significant effects on the environment.
Wildlife corridor: A wildlife corridor is a link of wildlife habitat, generally native vegetation, which joints two or more larger areas of similar wildlife habitat, Corridors are critical for the maintenance of ecological processes including allowing for the movement of animals and the continuation of viable populations of plants and animals.
Laxfield Neighbourhood Plan
2018 -2036