an-6003

Upload: jessewpeters

Post on 04-Jun-2018

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    1/6

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    2/6

    Shoot-through in Synchronous Buck Regulators AN-6003

    04/25/2003 2

    Gate Step The shoot-through culpritIf the adaptive circuits are working, then weshouldnt see any shoot-through, right?

    Not exactly. Most shoot-through occurs when the

    high-side MOSFET is turned on. The high dv/dT onthe SW node (Drain of the low-side MOSFET)couples charge through C

    GD. This drives the gate

    positive at the very moment when the driver is tryingto hold the gate low. C

    GDand C

    GS form a capacitive

    voltage divider, which attenuates the gate step suchthat the worst case peak amplitude of the gate step(V

    STEP) seen is:

    +

    )CC(R

    T

    R

    INGDT)PK(STEP

    GSGDT

    R

    e1T

    VCRV

    (1a)

    Where RT= R

    DRIVER+ R

    GATE+ R

    DAMPING(see Figure 5),

    and TR is the rise-time of the SW node.

    The limiting case is when TR= 0. Then

    GSGD

    GDIN)MAX(STEP

    CC

    CVV

    + (1b)

    This expression only illustrates the AC portion of thegate step. The gate step is injected onto whatevervoltage the MOSFETs gate has discharged to. Forexample, if the switch node rises when VGS = 1V,and the gate step amplitude is 2V, instantaneouslythere will be 3 V

    GSwhich is more than enough to

    have a high instantaneous current through bothMOSFETs. Its important, therefore that adaptivegate drive circuits allow sufficient delay to preventthe high side from turning on before the low-side V

    GS

    is discharged down to a few hundred mV.

    An illustration of gate step is seen below.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 20 40 60 80

    t (nS)

    VGS

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    V

    SW NODE VOLTAGE

    LS MOSFET GATE

    Figure 3. Gate Step for VIN.=12V.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    0 20 40 60 80

    t (nS)

    VGS

    -5

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    V

    SW NODE VOLTAGE

    LS MOSFET GATE

    Figure 4. Gate Step for VIN.=20V

    Further exacerbating the problem for adaptivecircuits is the fact that the adaptive comparator is notactually sensing the voltage at the internal gatejunction of the MOSFET. As seen in Figure 5, theinternal MOSFETs gate voltage has an unavoidable

    internal RGATEresistance. In addition, some designerslike to have a damping resistor in series with thegates of MOSFETs that are located physically faraway from their gate drives. This creates a biggerproblem for the adaptive gate drive circuit. Theseseries resistances form a voltage divider with theinternal pull-down resistance of the low-side gatedrive of the IC, causing it to think the gate voltage islower than it really is when it decides to release theHigh-side driver.

    RDRIVER

    RDamping

    H.S. MOSFET

    1V

    HDRV

    LDRV RGATE

    CGS

    CGD

    D

    S

    G

    Q2

    Delay

    Figure 5. Resistance in the gate drive pathattenuates the voltage at the MOSFET gate node.

    When there is 1V at the pin of the IC, the internalMOSFET V

    GSis:

    ( )DampingGATEDRIVERDRIVER

    )I(GS RRR

    R

    V1V ++=

    Consider an example where:

    RDRIVER

    = 2, RGATE

    = 1.2

    RDAMPING

    = 5

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    3/6

    Shoot-through in Synchronous Buck Regulators AN-6003

    04/25/2003 3

    When the adaptive gate circuit switches, the internalMOSFET gate voltage will be:

    ( ) V1.452.122

    V1=++

    In this example, if there were no delay in the circuit,the HDRV would turn on when the low-sideMOSFET has just begun to discharge, causing a veryhigh shoot-through current.

    Much of the problem in the above circuit is thedamping resistor. If a damping resistance isnecessary, place a Schottky diode across the resistor(as shown below) to reduce the effect the dampingresistor will have on the adaptive gate drive.

    RDRIVER

    RDamping

    H.S. MOSFET

    1V

    HDRV

    LDRV

    Delay

    H.S. MOSFET

    RGATE

    CGS

    CGD

    D

    S

    G

    Q2

    Figure 6. Schottky diode reduces dampingresistor error in adaptive gate drive

    When using the schottky, the internal gate node willbe at:

    ( )GATEDRIVERDRIVER

    )I(GS RRR

    V15.0V ++=

    or 2.1V for our example. A dramatic improvement.

    Furthermore, the Schottky reduces the duration of theshoot-through step, since only R

    GATE+ R

    DRIVERwill be

    discharging CGS

    , rather than the sum ofR

    GATE+ R

    DAMPING+ R

    DRIVER.

    Table 1 below illustrates the performanceimprovement in our example with and without theSchottky diode:

    No

    Schottky

    With

    Schottky

    Comparator Flips @ VGS(INT)= 4.1 2.1 V

    VGS(INT)after 20nS delay 2.23 1.14 V

    VSTEP Peak 2.50 1.25 V

    Peak current 36 0.29 A

    Power Loss @ FSW=300KHz 1100 20 mW

    Conditions: Typical low-side MOSFET, 25nSdelay from comparator sense to beginning of SWnode rise, 19V

    IN, 10nS SW node rise time.

    Table 1 . Peak Currents with and without

    Schottky with RDAMPING

    = 5 .

    MOSFET Choices

    MOSFET characteristics can have a dramatic effecton how much shoot-through current can be inducedby the gate step. The worst case for shoot-through isan infinitely fast (0 rise time) on the drain node. Theamount of gate step is largely determined by the

    ration of CGSand CGD. Once the size of the gate stepis determined (eq. 1 above), the peak magnitude ofthe shoot-through current can be calculated as :

    )MIN(THSTEP(MAX)M)MAX(PEAK VVGKI (2)

    where GMis the transconductance (in S, or A/V)

    given in the datasheet. While only a smallpercentage of MOSFETs exhibit V

    TH(MIN)at room

    temperature, VTH

    goes down with increasing junctiontemperature, therefore V

    TH(MIN)is a good proxy for the

    VTH

    at the operating junction temperature of theMOSFET. Subsequent calculations use V

    TH(MIN)for

    this reason.

    GMis not really a contstant, however, and its value isgreatly reduced low enhancement voltages (VGS

    -VTH

    ).In these calculations we use a factor "K" from thegraph below, which is typical of G

    Mwith low values

    of enhancement. The X axis of Figure 7 is calculated

    as)MIN(TH

    )MIN(THGS

    V

    VV

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    0% 50% 100% 150% 200% 250% 300%

    Normalized Enhancement Voltage

    K

    (GM

    Multipler)

    Figure 7 GMfactor (K)

    Table 2 shows the relevant MOSFET characteristicswhich determine the maximum shoot-throughcurrent.

    MOSFET CGS CGD TypicalVTHMinVTH

    GM

    MOSFET1 3,514 307 1.6 1 86

    MOSFET2 5,070 230 1.2 0.8 97

    MOSFET3 4,942 315 1.6 1 80

    MOSFET4 3,888 401 1.6 1 135

    MOSFET5 6,324 281 1.15 0.6 90

    Table 2 . Low-Side MOSFET Characteristics

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    4/6

    Shoot-through in Synchronous Buck Regulators AN-6003

    04/25/2003 4

    Each of the MOSFETs represented is from a differentprocess and has different ratios of internalcapacitance.

    MOSFET VSTEP(MAX) VTH(MIN)VSTEP

    VTH(MIN)

    IPEAK

    (max)

    MOSFET1 1.53 1 0.53 0.31

    MOSFET2 0.82 0.8 0.02 0.02MOSFET3 1.14 1 0.14 0.07

    MOSFET4 1.78 1 0.78 16.37

    MOSFET5 0.81 0.6 0.21 0.13

    Table 3. Maximum VSTEP

    and ISHOOTTHROUGH

    @V

    IN= 19V and V

    GS(START)= 0V.

    Table 3 assumes that the VGS

    has dropped to 0 beforethe SW node rises when HDRV turns on. Asdemonstrated above, the smallest amplitude of V

    STEP

    comes from MOSFET2 and MOSFET5, which arelow-threshold devices. Low threshold in large part isdue to a thin gate oxide, giving the MOSFET a high

    GDGSC

    Cratio, which attenuates VSTEP. more than other

    MOSFETs.

    Also, Table 3 only shows the theoretical peak currentin Q2 due to the gate step. In a real converter,parasitic inductance limits the rise in current to4A/nS. Even for the MOSFET4, the gate pulse onlystays above threshold for about 5nS, so the shoot-through current would be further limited.

    An additional shortcoming of the simplifiedcalculations of Table 3 is the assumption that SWnode turn-on begins when V

    GSof the low-side is at 0.

    As we saw from the earlier discussion, this may not

    be the case.

    Reducing gate step by slowingdown Q1 rise timeUsually, designers attempt to achieve the fastest rise-time possible on the High-Side MOSFET in order tominimize switching losses. A simplified expression

    for turn-on losses (P(TURN-ON)) for the high-sideMOSFET is:

    2

    IVTFP OUTINRSWONTURN (3)

    where TRis the rise-time of the MOSFET. A very

    fast rise-time (highdt

    dVon SW) is desirable to

    minimize high-side power dissipation, but if it resultsin a large gate-step, causing shoot-through, thedissipation effect can be greater than the dissipationinduced by slowing the rise time. In some situationsthis is the only practical approach to eliminate shoot-

    through.As can be seen in Figure 8, slowing down the risetime has a dramatic effect on the amplitude of V

    STEP

    that is coupled into the Low-side MOSFET gate. TR

    slowdown has the added benefit of reducing EMI, butcomes at a cost of efficiency loss . Figure 8 andsubsequent tables were simulated with MOSFETstypical of those used in notebook PCs (2 in parallel)with 15A output current and 19V

    IN. Figure 8 assumes

    that the SW node begins to rise when the internalgate node has discharged down to 0.5V.

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    5/6

    Shoot-through in Synchronous Buck Regulators AN-6003

    04/25/2003 5

    0.0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    1.8

    2.0

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

    19V RiseTime(nS)

    V(STEP)Peak

    MOSFET4

    MOSFET1

    MOSFET3

    MOSFET5MOSFET2

    Figure 8 . Effect of SW node rise-time on VSTEP

    VIN=19V, SW rise starts @ VGS(Q2)

    = 0.5V

    Table 4 shows the power loss due to shoot-throughfor each MOSFET.

    The major component of switching loss during Q1

    turn-on is:

    2

    IVFtP OUTINSWRONTURN

    (3)

    and is computed in the right-most column for eachrise-time in Table 4 for I

    OUT= 15A.

    TR(SW) FET1 FET2 FET3 FET4 FET5 Q1 tRLoss

    5 18 10 10 56 27 214

    10 12 6 6 39 24 428

    15 7 3 3 28 19 641

    20 3 0 0 19 16 855

    25 0 0 0 11 12 1,069

    30 0 0 0 4 8 1,283

    Table 4. Worst case (Min VTH

    ) shoot-through

    power loss (mW)SW rise starts @ V

    GS(Q2)= 0.5V

    In most cases, the shoot-through is negligble, soslowing down high-side rise-time would not be aprudent choice, since the more power would be lostin slowing down the rise time than power saved byeliminating shoot-through.

    If, the controller's gate drive starts to turn Q1 onbefore allowing the internal node of Q2 to discharge,

    SW will rise when there is still a substantial VGS

    onQ2 as shown is Table 5. Slowing down Q1 can thenbe an effective strategy to reduce shoot-throughlosses.

    TR(SW) FET1 FET2 FET3 FET4 FET5 Q1 tRLoss

    5 90 62 29 380 551 214

    10 30 31 24 127 266 428

    15 23 26 18 61 58 641

    20 16 21 13 50 54 855

    25 8 16 7 39 51 1,069

    30 0 11 1 25 47 1,283

    Table 5. Worst case (Min VTH

    ) shoot-throughpower loss (mW)

    SW rise starts @ VGS(Q2)

    = 1V

    This is typically achieved by adding resistance (RGin Figure 2) in series with C

    BOOT. An approximation

    for TRprovides a good starting point for choosing a

    value of RG:

    RGRCT )HL(DRIVEGSR + (4)

    where RDRIVE(L-H)

    is the resistance of the ICs high-sideMOSFET gate driver when driving from low to high.

  • 8/13/2019 AN-6003

    6/6

    Shoot-through in Synchronous Buck Regulators AN-6003

    04/25/2003 6

    DISCLAIMER

    FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR RESERVES THE RIGHT TO MAKE CHANGES WITHOUT FURTHER NOTICETO ANY PRODUCTS HEREIN TO IMPROVE RELIABILITY, FUNCTION OR DESIGN. FAIRCHILD DOES NOT

    ASSUME ANY LIABILITY ARISING OUT OF THE APPLICATION OR USE OF ANY PRODUCT OR CIRCUITDESCRIBED HEREIN; NEITHER DOES IT CONVEY ANY LICENSE UNDER ITS PATENT RIGHTS, NOR THERIGHTS OF OTHERS.

    LIFE SUPPORT POLICY

    FAIRCHILDS PRODUCTS ARE NOT AUTHORIZED FOR USE AS CRITICAL COMPONENTS IN LIFESUPPORT DEVICES OR SYSTEMS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS WRITTEN APPROVAL OF THE PRESIDENTOF FAIRCHILD SEMICONDUCTOR CORPORATION. As used herein:

    1. Life support devices or systems are devices or systemswhich, (a) are intended for surgical implant into thebody or (b) support or sustain life, and (c) whose failureto perform when properly used in accordanceinstructions for use provided in the labeling, can bereasonably expected to result in a significant injury ofthe user.

    2. A critical component in any component of a life support,device or system whose failure to perform can bereasonably expected to cause the failure of the lifesupport device or system, or to affect its safety oreffectiveness.

    www.fairchildsemi.com