“an act relative to the achievement gap” report of the superintendent melinda j. boone, ed.d....
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap”
Report of the SuperintendentMelinda J. Boone, Ed.D.
March 4, 2010
![Page 2: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
History of the Legislation
Origins are in the Readiness Project – over 9 months of meetings and discussions regarding the future of public education in Massachusetts
Report released from this project in June 2008 – “Ready for 21st Century Success – The New Promise of Public Education”Focused on the achievement gap
![Page 3: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
History of the Legislation
July 2008 – Executive Office of Education is formally established & drafting of legislation for “Readiness Schools” was initiatedFocus was on “creating opportunities for
innovation across the state & allowing intervention strategies to be implemented where they were needed most”
![Page 4: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
History of Legislation
January 2009 – Governor proposes language in FY10 budget to provide a targeted, charter school “smart cap lift”
July 2009 – Governor files two separate bills “An Act Relative to Charter Schools in Underperforming Districts” and “An Act Establishing Readiness Schools”
Fall 2009 – Joint Committee on Education combined the two bills into one
![Page 5: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
History of Legislation
November 17, 2009 – Senate passes its version of the bill
January 6, 2010 – House passes its version of the bill
January 14, 2010 – Conference Committee Report is enacted
January 18, 2010 – Governor Patrick signs into law “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap”
![Page 6: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Focus of Legislation
Innovation SchoolsIntervention StrategiesCharter School “Smart Cap Lift”Miscellaneous
Regional schools’ transportation “Race to the Top” ReportingEducation Finance ReportOthers
![Page 7: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Innovation Schools
May be established as a new school or as a conversion of existing school
Must be authorized by local school committee & operate according to an “innovation plan”
Articulates areas of increased autonomy & flexibility Curriculum Budget School schedule & calendar Staffing policies & procedures, including waivers from or
modifications to contracts or collective bargaining agreements Professional development
![Page 8: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Intervention Strategies
Provides that Level 4 (underperforming)& 5 (chronically underperforming)schools drawn from lowest performing 20% of schools in Commonwealth
Limits the number of Level 4 & 5 schools that can be designated at any point to 4% of all schools in Commonwealth (72 total)
Provides new rules, tools and supports through collaboratively developed turnaround plans for Level 4 & 5 schools
![Page 9: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Intervention Strategies (cont.)
Local superintendents primarily responsible for developing turnaround plans for Level 4 schools, with approval by the Commissioner
Commissioner is primarily responsible for developing turnaround plans in Level 5 schools
![Page 10: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Intervention Strategies (cont.)
Superintendent/Commissioner must create a stakeholder group to make recommendations on the content of the turnaround plan
Turnaround plan must include: Support for social service & health needs of
students & families Workforce development services for students &
families Steps to address achievement gaps for ELL,
special education and low-income students Financial plan
![Page 11: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Intervention Strategies (cont.)
Turnaround plan must also include measurable, annual goals: Attendance, dismissal rates and exclusion rates Student safety and discipline Student promotion, graduation and dropout rates Student achievement on the MCAS Reduction of achievement gaps among different
groups of students Student acquisition and master of 21st Century
skills Parent and family engagement
![Page 12: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Charter School “Smart Cap Lift”
Phased increased of the state’s net school spending cap from 9% to 18% for the 10% of lowest performing districts
Removes the statewide cap of 4% as a percentage of the general student population in total charter school population
Requires all current & prospective charter school applicants to develop student recruitment and retention plans
![Page 13: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Charter School “Smart Cap Lift” (cont.)
Increases the reimbursement to school districts from 100/60/40 model to 100/25/25/25/25/25
Emphasizes accountability and transparency in the authorization and renewal process
![Page 14: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Federal School Turnaround Grants
February 2010 – USED posted regulations for competitive grants to states to intervene in lowest performing schools
Massachusetts will be awarded $76 million over 3 years to provide competitive grants to local school districts for Level 4 schools
Districts may apply for $500,000 or more per year, up to 3 years, on behalf of Level 4 Schools
![Page 15: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Federal School Turnaround Grants
Districts applying for School Turnaround Grants are required to choose one of four prescribed intervention models: Restart Model: closes a school run by the district
and reopens it under the control of a charter management or educational management organization
School Closure: requires the closing of a school and assigning students to other high achieving schools in the district or to a charter school
Turnaround Model: requires replacing at least 50% of the staff and the principal
![Page 16: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Federal School Turnaround Grants
Transformation Model: must include strategies in 4 key areas:
Developing teacher and school leader effectiveness Comprehensive instructional reform strategies Extending learning time and creating community-oriented
schools Providing operating flexibility and sustained support Note: Principals who are in place prior to the initiation of
the transformation model must be replaced
![Page 17: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Worcester’s Current Status
Two Level 4 schools announced today: Chandler Elementary and Union Hill Elementary
Schools currently in restructuring and/or corrective action will likely be deemed Level 3 schools, also requiring instructional improvements
![Page 18: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Next Steps
Appoint a Stakeholder Team to begin the school redesign process (specific timelines)
Work with the EAW to address filling teacher vacancies at Level 4 schools
Appoint new principals at Level 4 schools Finalize school redesign model for submission
to Commissioner Apply for School Turnaround Grants to support
redesign efforts at Level 4 schools
![Page 19: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Next Steps
Continue focusing on the Worcester Improvement Strategy to address student achievement across the district
![Page 20: “An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010](https://reader036.vdocument.in/reader036/viewer/2022082820/56649e555503460f94b4ca42/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The principals, teachers and communities of Chandler Elementary and Union Hill Elementary have worked extremely hard to provide high quality educational opportunities for all the students enrolled in their schools. This is system issue. There is no single contributing factor that led to the schools’ Level 4 designation. I want to personally thank the principals, teachers, central office support, parents and community for their level of support and commitment to addressing the educational needs of students in Worcester.
Melinda J. Boone