an svd in spherical surface wave tomographyqmi/presentations/2017rio.pdf · rio de janeiro, 2...
TRANSCRIPT
An SVD in Spherical Surface Wave TomographyChemnitz University of Technology, Faculty of Mathematics
An SVD in Spherical Surface Wave Tomography
Michael Quellmalz(joint work with Ralf Hielscher and Daniel Potts)
Chemnitz University of TechnologyFaculty of Mathematics
New Trends in Parameter Identification for Mathematical ModelsChemnitz Symposium on Inverse Problems on Tour
Rio de Janeiro, 2 November 2017
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 1 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
An SVD in Spherical Surface Wave Tomography
Content
1. IntroductionMotivation
2. Arc transformDefinitionSingular value decomposition
3. Special casesArcs starting in a fixed pointRecovery of local functionsArcs with fixed length
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 2 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Introduction
Content
1. IntroductionMotivation
2. Arc transformDefinitionSingular value decomposition
3. Special casesArcs starting in a fixed pointRecovery of local functionsArcs with fixed length
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 3 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Introduction
Funk–Radon transformI Sphere S2 = ξ ∈ R3 : ‖ξ‖ = 1I Function f : S2 → C
I Funk–Radon transform (a.k.a. Funktransform or spherical Radontransform)
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dλ(η)
Theorem [Funk 1911]
Any even function f can be reconstructed from Ff .
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 4 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Introduction
Funk–Radon transformI Sphere S2 = ξ ∈ R3 : ‖ξ‖ = 1I Function f : S2 → C
I Funk–Radon transform (a.k.a. Funktransform or spherical Radontransform)
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dλ(η)
Theorem [Funk 1911]
Any even function f can be reconstructed from Ff .
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 4 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Introduction
Funk–Radon transformI Sphere S2 = ξ ∈ R3 : ‖ξ‖ = 1I Function f : S2 → C
I Funk–Radon transform (a.k.a. Funktransform or spherical Radontransform)
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dλ(η)
Theorem [Funk 1911]
Any even function f can be reconstructed from Ff .
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 4 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionMotivation
Spherical surface wave tomography
I Seismic waves propagate along the surface of the earthI Speed of propagation depends on the position on S2
Method
I Measure the traveltimes of surface waves between many pairs ofepicenter and detector
I Reconstruct the local speed of propagation
Assumption
A wave propagates along the arc of a great circle.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 5 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionSelected references
P. Funk.Uber Flachen mit lauter geschlossenen geodatischen Linien.Math. Ann., 74(2): 278 – 300, 1913.
J. H. Woodhouse and A. M. Dziewonski.Mapping the upper mantle: Three-dimensional modeling of earth structure byinversion of seismic waveforms.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 89(B7):5953–5986, 1984.
A. Amirbekyan, V. Michel, and F. J. Simons.Parametrizing surface wave tomographic models with harmonic spherical splines.Geophys. J. Int., 174(2):617–628, 2008.
R. Hielscher, D. Potts and M. Quellmalz.An SVD in spherical surface wave tomographyIn B. Hofmann, A. Leitao and J. Zubelli, Eds., New Trends in ParameterIdentification for Mathematical Models. Birkhauser, Basel, 2018.https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05284
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 6 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionSelected references
P. Funk.Uber Flachen mit lauter geschlossenen geodatischen Linien.Math. Ann., 74(2): 278 – 300, 1913.
J. H. Woodhouse and A. M. Dziewonski.Mapping the upper mantle: Three-dimensional modeling of earth structure byinversion of seismic waveforms.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 89(B7):5953–5986, 1984.
A. Amirbekyan, V. Michel, and F. J. Simons.Parametrizing surface wave tomographic models with harmonic spherical splines.Geophys. J. Int., 174(2):617–628, 2008.
R. Hielscher, D. Potts and M. Quellmalz.An SVD in spherical surface wave tomographyIn B. Hofmann, A. Leitao and J. Zubelli, Eds., New Trends in ParameterIdentification for Mathematical Models. Birkhauser, Basel, 2018.https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05284
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 6 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionSelected references
P. Funk.Uber Flachen mit lauter geschlossenen geodatischen Linien.Math. Ann., 74(2): 278 – 300, 1913.
J. H. Woodhouse and A. M. Dziewonski.Mapping the upper mantle: Three-dimensional modeling of earth structure byinversion of seismic waveforms.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 89(B7):5953–5986, 1984.
A. Amirbekyan, V. Michel, and F. J. Simons.Parametrizing surface wave tomographic models with harmonic spherical splines.Geophys. J. Int., 174(2):617–628, 2008.
R. Hielscher, D. Potts and M. Quellmalz.An SVD in spherical surface wave tomographyIn B. Hofmann, A. Leitao and J. Zubelli, Eds., New Trends in ParameterIdentification for Mathematical Models. Birkhauser, Basel, 2018.https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05284
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 6 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
IntroductionSelected references
P. Funk.Uber Flachen mit lauter geschlossenen geodatischen Linien.Math. Ann., 74(2): 278 – 300, 1913.
J. H. Woodhouse and A. M. Dziewonski.Mapping the upper mantle: Three-dimensional modeling of earth structure byinversion of seismic waveforms.J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth, 89(B7):5953–5986, 1984.
A. Amirbekyan, V. Michel, and F. J. Simons.Parametrizing surface wave tomographic models with harmonic spherical splines.Geophys. J. Int., 174(2):617–628, 2008.
R. Hielscher, D. Potts and M. Quellmalz.An SVD in spherical surface wave tomographyIn B. Hofmann, A. Leitao and J. Zubelli, Eds., New Trends in ParameterIdentification for Mathematical Models. Birkhauser, Basel, 2018.https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.05284
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 6 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transform
Content
1. IntroductionMotivation
2. Arc transformDefinitionSingular value decomposition
3. Special casesArcs starting in a fixed pointRecovery of local functionsArcs with fixed length
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 7 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transformI Function f : S2 → R
I Surface waves: f = 1c
(c ... speed of sound)I ξ, ζ ∈ S2 not antipodalI γ(ξ, ζ) great circle arc
Definition
t(ξ, ζ) =
∫γ(ξ,ζ)
f dγ
t is not continuous on S2 × S2
We choose a different parameterization
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 8 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transform: alternative parameterization
I ψ = arccos(ξ>ζ) ... length of γI Q ∈ SO(3) such that
I Qξ = e−ψ/2 andI Qζ = eψ/2,
where eψ = (sinψ, cosψ, 0)
DefinitionA : C(S2)→ C(SO(3)× [0, 2π]),
Af(Q,ψ) =
∫ ψ/2
−ψ/2f(Q−1eϕ) dϕ
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 9 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transform: alternative parameterization
I ψ = arccos(ξ>ζ) ... length of γI Q ∈ SO(3) such that
I Qξ = e−ψ/2 andI Qζ = eψ/2,
where eψ = (sinψ, cosψ, 0)
DefinitionA : C(S2)→ C(SO(3)× [0, 2π]),
Af(Q,ψ) =
∫ ψ/2
−ψ/2f(Q−1eϕ) dϕ
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 9 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformDefinition
The arc transform: alternative parameterization
I ψ = arccos(ξ>ζ) ... length of γI Q ∈ SO(3) such that
I Qξ = e−ψ/2 andI Qζ = eψ/2,
where eψ = (sinψ, cosψ, 0)
DefinitionA : C(S2)→ C(SO(3)× [0, 2π]),
Af(Q,ψ) =
∫ ψ/2
−ψ/2f(Q−1eϕ) dϕ
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 9 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Notation: On the sphere S2
I Spherical coordinates
ξ(ϕ, ϑ) = sin(ϑ)eϕ + cosϑ(001
)
I Orthonormal basis on L2(S2): spherical harmonics of degree n ∈ N
Y kn (ϕ, ϑ) =
√2n+ 1
4π
(n− k)!
(n+ k)!P kn (cosϑ) eikϕ, k = −n, . . . , n
I P kn ... associated Legendre function
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 10 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Notation: On the sphere S2
I Spherical coordinates
ξ(ϕ, ϑ) = sin(ϑ)eϕ + cosϑ(001
)
I Orthonormal basis on L2(S2): spherical harmonics of degree n ∈ N
Y kn (ϕ, ϑ) =
√2n+ 1
4π
(n− k)!
(n+ k)!P kn (cosϑ) eikϕ, k = −n, . . . , n
I P kn ... associated Legendre function
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 10 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Notation: On the rotation group SO(3)
I Rotation group
SO(3) = Q ∈ R3×3 : Q−1 = Q>, det(Q) = 1
I Orthogonal basis on L2(SO(3)): rotational harmonics (WignerD-functions)
Dj,kn (Q) =
∫S2Y kn (Q−1ξ)Y j
n (ξ) dξ
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 11 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Notation: On the rotation group SO(3)
I Rotation group
SO(3) = Q ∈ R3×3 : Q−1 = Q>, det(Q) = 1
I Orthogonal basis on L2(SO(3)): rotational harmonics (WignerD-functions)
Dj,kn (Q) =
∫S2Y kn (Q−1ξ)Y j
n (ξ) dξ
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 11 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Theorem [Dahlen & Tromp 1998]
Let n ∈ N and k ∈ −n, . . . , n. Then
AY kn (Q,ψ) =
n∑j=−n
P jn(0)Dj,kn (Q) sj(ψ),
where
sj(ψ) =
ψ, j = 02 sin(jψ/2)
j , j 6= 0
and
P jn(0) =
(−1)
n+j2
√2n+14π
(n−j−1)!!(n+j−1)!!(n−j)!!(n+j)!! , n+ j even
0, n+ j odd.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 12 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Arc transformSingular value decomposition
Singular value decomposition [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
The operatorA : L2(S2)→ L2(SO(3)× [0, 2π]) is compact with the singularvalue decomposition
AY kn = σnE
kn, n ∈ N, k ∈ −n, . . . , n,
with singular values
σn =
√32π3
2n+ 1
√√√√π2
3
∣∣∣P 0n(0)
∣∣∣2 +n∑j=1
1
j2
∣∣∣P jn(0)∣∣∣2 ∈ O( 1√
n
)
and the orthonormal functions in L2(SO(3)× [0, 2π])
Enk = σ−1n
n∑j=−n
P jn(0)Dj,kn (Q) sj(ψ).
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 13 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special cases
Content
1. IntroductionMotivation
2. Arc transformDefinitionSingular value decomposition
3. Special casesArcs starting in a fixed pointRecovery of local functionsArcs with fixed length
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 14 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs starting in a fixed point
Arcs from the north pole
I Fix one endpoint of the arcs as the northpole e3:
Bf(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)) =
∫γ(e3, ξ(ϕ,ϑ))
f dγ
I If f is differentiable, it can be recoveredfrom Bf by
f(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)) =d
dϑBf(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)).
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 15 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs starting in a fixed point
Arcs from the north pole
I Fix one endpoint of the arcs as the northpole e3:
Bf(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)) =
∫γ(e3, ξ(ϕ,ϑ))
f dγ
I If f is differentiable, it can be recoveredfrom Bf by
f(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)) =d
dϑBf(ξ(ϕ, ϑ)).
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 15 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs starting in a fixed point
Arcs between two sets
More general Theorem [Amirbekyan 2007]
Let S be an open subset of S2 and A,B ⊂ Snonempty sets with A ∪B = S. If f ∈ C(S2)and ∫
γ(ξ,ζ)f dγ = 0 ∀ξ ∈ A, ζ ∈ B,
then f ≡ 0 on S.
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 16 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesRecovery of local functions
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let f ∈ C(S2) and Ω be a convex subset of S2 whose closure Ω is strictlycontained in a hemisphere, i.e., there exists a ζ ∈ S2 such that 〈ξ, ζ〉 > 0 forall ξ ∈ Ω. If ∫
γ(ξ,η)f dγ = 0 for all ξ,η ∈ ∂Ω, (1)
then f = 0 on Ω.
Proof
I Extend f to zero outside Ω
I (1) implies that the Funk–Radon transform of f must vanishI f must be oddI Because supp f ⊂ Ω is contained in a hemisphere, f must vanish
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 17 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Arcs with fixed length
We fix the arclength ψ ∈ [0, 2π] and define
Aψ = A(·, ψ) : L2(S2)→ L2(SO(3)).
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 18 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Arcs with fixed length
We fix the arclength ψ ∈ [0, 2π] and define
Aψ = A(·, ψ) : L2(S2)→ L2(SO(3)).
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 18 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular Value Decomposition [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
Let ψ ∈ (0, 2π) be fixed. The operatorAψ : L2(S2)→ L2(SO(3)) has theSVD
AψY kn = µn(ψ)Zkn,ψ, n ∈ N, k ∈ −n, . . . , n,
with singular values
µn(ψ) =
√√√√ n∑j=−n
8π2
2n+ 1
∣∣∣P jn(0)∣∣∣2 sj(ψ)2
and singular functions
Zkn,ψ =1
µn(ψ)
n∑j=−n
P jn(0) sj(ψ)Dj,kn ∈ L2(SO(3)).
HenceAψ is injective.2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 19 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 0.02π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 0.10π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 500
2
4
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 0.20π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
2
4
6
8
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 0.40π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
5
10
15
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 1.00π (half circle)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
32
34
36
38
40
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 1.04π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
35
40
45
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 1.90π
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
0
50
100
150
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on nψ = 2.00π (Funk–Radon transform)
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
0
50
100
150
polynomial degree n
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 20 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 0
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 1
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 2
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 3
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 4
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 5
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 6
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 7
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 8
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 9
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values µn(ψ): dependency on arc-length ψ
0 π 2π0
50
100
150
ψ
(n+
1 2)µn(ψ
)2
n even
limitn = 100
0 π 2π0
10
20
30
40
ψ
n odd
limitn = 101
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 21 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
Singular values: asymptotic behavior
Theorem [Hielscher, Potts, Q. 2017]
The singular values µn(ψ) ofAψ satisfy for odd n = 2m− 1
limm→∞
4m− 1
4µ2m−1(ψ)2 =
2πψ, ψ ∈ [0, π]
4π2 − 2πψ, ψ ∈ [π, 2π],
and for even n = 2m
limm→∞
4m+ 1
4µ2m(ψ)2 =
2πψ, ψ ∈ [0, π]
12πψ − 2π2, ψ ∈ [π, 2π].
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 22 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
Special casesArcs with fixed length
ψ = 2π: Great circles [Funk 1911]
I Funk–Radon transform
F : C(S2)→ C(S2),
Ff(ξ) =
∫〈ξ,η〉=0
f(η) dγ(η)
I Injective only for even functions
ψ = π: Half-circle transform
I Injective for all functions [Groemer 1998], [Goodey & Weil 2006]I [Rubin 2017] half circles in one hemisphere
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 23 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi
The end
\endinput
2 November 2017 · Michael Quellmalz 24 / 24 tu-chemnitz.de/∼qmi