analysis of statistics 2012 - council of europe

60
Analysis of statistics 2012 January 2013

Upload: others

Post on 09-Feb-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Analysis of statistics 2012

January 2013

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 2/60

Table of contents

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2012 ................................................................. 4 A. Number of new applications ............................................................................ 4

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications ................................. 4

C. Processing of applications ............................................................................... 4

1. Pre-allocation ............................................................................................ 4

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions ........................................................... 4

3. Communicated applications ......................................................................... 4

4. Judgments ................................................................................................ 5

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court) ........................ 5

D. Priority policy ................................................................................................ 5

General information ............................................................................................... 6 Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation ......................................... 7

Processing of applications ................................................................................... 9

Country-specific information .................................................................................. 14 Albania ............................................................................................................ 14

Andorra ........................................................................................................... 15

Armenia .......................................................................................................... 16

Austria ............................................................................................................ 17

Azerbaijan ....................................................................................................... 18

Belgium ........................................................................................................... 19

Bosnia and Herzegovina .................................................................................... 20

Bulgaria .......................................................................................................... 21

Croatia ............................................................................................................ 22

Cyprus ............................................................................................................ 23

Czech Republic ................................................................................................. 24

Denmark ......................................................................................................... 25

Estonia ............................................................................................................ 26

Finland ............................................................................................................ 27

France ............................................................................................................. 28

Georgia ........................................................................................................... 29

Germany ......................................................................................................... 30

Greece ............................................................................................................ 31

Hungary .......................................................................................................... 32

Iceland ............................................................................................................ 33

Ireland ............................................................................................................ 34

Italy ................................................................................................................ 35

Latvia ............................................................................................................. 36

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 3/60

Liechtenstein ................................................................................................... 37

Lithuania ......................................................................................................... 38

Luxembourg .................................................................................................... 39

Malta .............................................................................................................. 40

Republic of Moldova .......................................................................................... 41

Monaco ........................................................................................................... 42

Montenegro ..................................................................................................... 43

Netherlands ..................................................................................................... 44

Norway ........................................................................................................... 45

Poland ............................................................................................................. 46

Portugal .......................................................................................................... 47

Romania .......................................................................................................... 48

Russia ............................................................................................................. 49

San Marino ...................................................................................................... 50

Serbia ............................................................................................................. 51

Slovakia .......................................................................................................... 52

Slovenia .......................................................................................................... 53

Spain .............................................................................................................. 54

Sweden ........................................................................................................... 55

Switzerland ...................................................................................................... 56

“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia” ...................................................... 57

Turkey ............................................................................................................ 58

Ukraine ........................................................................................................... 59

United Kingdom ................................................................................................ 60

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 4/60

Overview of the Court’s statistics in 2012

A. Number of new applications

In 2012 65,150 applications were allocated to a judicial formation, an overall increase of

1% compared with 2011 (64,400). 48,350 of these were identified as Single-Judge cases

likely to be declared inadmissible (an increase of 1% in relation to 2011). 16,800 were

identified as Chamber or Committee1 cases (an increase of 3%).

B. Applications disposed of judicially and pending applications

87,879 applications were disposed of judicially, an increase of 68% in relation to 2011

(52,188). The number of cases disposed of therefore exceeded those allocated by

approximately 22,700 (i.e. a monthly surplus of almost 1,900). As a result, and for the

first time since 1998, the stock of allocated applications pending before the Court

decreased over the year, by 16% from 151,600 to 128,100.

C. Processing of applications

1. Pre-allocation

Before a case is allocated to a judicial formation applicants are required to complete the

application form and submit the necessary supporting documents on pain of

administrative disposal. As at 31 December 2012 the number of applications pending at

this pre-judicial stage stood at 20,300, a decrease of 10% in relation to the same date

the previous year (22,600). The number of applications disposed of administratively in

2012 was 18,700, an increase of 39%.

2. Inadmissibility or strike out decisions

In 2012 86,201 applications were declared inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases

by a Single Judge, a Committee or a Chamber, a 70% increase compared with 2011

(50,677). The Single-Judge formation decided 81,764 cases in 2012, an increase of 74%

compared with 2011 (46,930). This increase is due to the introduction of new working

methods and to the fact that in 2012 more judges were appointed Single Judges. The

number of applications struck out, in a decision or a judgment, following a friendly

settlement or a unilateral declaration, increased by 25% in 2012 (1,532 in 2011).

Friendly settlements increased by 57%, but there were 14% fewer unilateral

declarations.

3. Communicated applications

Where an application is not on its face inadmissible, it is communicated to the

respondent Government. In 2012 5,238 applications were communicated (a decrease of

2% in relation to 2011 when 5,360 applications were communicated). This decrease can

be explained by efforts to concentrate on more time-consuming priority applications, a

higher number of which were communicated to the governments (see D. below).

1 Committee competence provided for in Article 28 § 1 b) of the Convention.

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 5/60

4. Judgments

Judgments were delivered in respect of 1,678 applications (compared with 1,511 in 2011

– an increase of 11%). A significant proportion of these applications were joined with the

result that the number of judgments actually delivered was 1,093, a decrease of 6%. 206

judgments were adopted by a three-judge Committee formation under the new

procedure introduced by Protocol 14.

5. Requests for interim measures (Rule 39 of the Rules of Court)

The total number of decisions on interim measures (1,973) decreased by 29% compared

with 2011 (2,782). The Court granted requests for interim measures in 103 cases (a

decrease of 70% compared with 342 in 2011) and dismissed them in 1,203 cases (33%

less than the 1,807 in 2011). The remainder fell outside the scope of Rule 39 of the Rules

of Court.

D. Priority policy2

In June 2009 the Court adopted a priority policy establishing seven different categories.

The essence of this policy is to concentrate more resources on the most important cases,

namely the cases falling within the top three categories (“priority applications”). At

31 December 2012 there were 6,568 applications in these categories.

The number of priority applications dealt with in 2012 increased by 30% compared to

2011. 16% more priority applications were communicated to the respondent

Governments in comparison with 2011. The number of priority applications declared

inadmissible or struck out of the list of cases by a Chamber or Committee increased by

61%. The number of priority applications struck out following a friendly settlement or a

unilateral declaration rose from 146 in 2011 to 158 in 2012. The number of priority

applications giving rise to a judgment increased by 33% in 2012 and represented 33% of

the total number of applications dealt with by judgments in 2012 (compared to 27% in

2011).

2 An explanation of the Court’s priority policy can be found on the Court’s internet site http://www.echr.coe.int/ECHR/EN/Header/The+Court/How+the+Court+works/Case+processing/ .

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 6/60

General information

Table 1 General statistical information

65150 64400 1%

2012 2011 +/-

5238 5360 -2%

2012 2011 +/-

87879 52188 68%

1678 1511 11%

86201 50677 70%

31/12/2012 1/1/2012 +/-

128100 151600 -16%

43050 45850 -6%

25200 13700 84%

59850 92050 -35%

31/12/2012 1/1/2012 +/-

20300 22600 -10%

2012 2011 +/-

18700 13450 39%

2. Interim procedural events

2012 2011 +/-[round figures (50)]

Applications at a pre-judicial stage

Applications communicated to respondent Government

1. Applications allocated to a judicial formation

By decision or judgment

Applications pending before a judicial formation

- Chamber (7 judges)

- Committee (3 judges)

Applications allocated

Applications disposed of administratively (applications not pursued)

3. Applications decided

4. Pending applications [round figures (50)]

5. Pre-judicial applications [round figures (50)]

- by judgment delivered

- by decision (inadmissible or struck out)

- Single-Judge formation

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 7/60

Number of applications allocated to a judicial formation3

Figure 1 Applications allocated to a judicial formation per year

840010500

13800

28200 27200

3250035400

3935041700

49850

57100

6130064400 65200

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Figure 2 Applications pending before a judicial formation

1260015900

19800

29400

38500

5000056800

66500

128100

151600

97300

79400

139650

119300

0

20000

40000

60000

80000

100000

120000

140000

160000

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

3 Figures represent the total number of applications, including joined applications. The document generally gives round figures. The upsurge in applications allocated in 2002 was due to a change in working methods, transferring much of the screening of inadmissible applications from the administrative, pre-judicial phase to the judicial stage.

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 8/60

Figure 3 High case-count States (more than 3,000 applications pending before a

judicial formation)

Russia

28600

22,3%

Italy

14200

11,1%

Bulgaria

3850

3,0%

United Kingdom

3300

2,6%

Poland

3100

2,4%

Republic of Moldova

3250

2,5%

remaining 37 States

25700

20,1%

Turkey

16900

13,2%

Ukraine

10450

8,2%

Serbia

10050

7,8%

Romania

8700

6,8%

Total number of pending applications: 128,100

Figure 4 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation4

Communicated

11214

8,8%

Pending Government

action

4555

3,6%

Admissible

846

0,7%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

51483

40,2%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

60013

46,8%

Total applications

128,100

4 The “Pending Government action” category was created to monitor applications following a judgment applying

the pilot procedure.

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 9/60

Figure 5 The Court’s total caseload by category

Cat. IV

20578

16,1%Cat. III

5417

4,2%

Cat. II

265

0,2%

Cat. I

886

0,7%

Cat. VI-VII

60013

46,8%

Cat. V

40945

32,0%

Total applications

128,100

Processing of applications

Figure 6 Major procedural steps in processing of applications

0

10000

20000

30000

40000

50000

60000

70000

80000

90000

100000

Applications

judgment delivered

241 757 934 889 736 816 1208 1719 1734 1880 2393 2607 1511 1678

Applications

communicated

1656 1463 1573 1686 1717 2447 2956 3232 3456 4416 6203 6674 5360 5238

Applications

inadmissible

or struck out

3520 6779 8992 17865 17272 20350 27612 28160 27059 30163 33067 38575 50677 86201

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 10/60

Figure 7 Number of judgments since 1999

177

695

888844

703 718

1105

1560 1503 15431625

1499

11571093

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012

Figure 8 Applications in categories I, II and III processed in 2011 and 2012

1194

537495

1342

573

412

1563

921

546

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

2010 2011 2012

communicated

decision

judgment

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 11/60

Table 2 Applications allocated per Contracting State and population

State

2009 2010 2011 2012 1.1.2009 1.1.2010 1.1.2011 1.1.2012 2009 2010 2011 2012

Albania 99 96 85 111 3185 3185 2832 3195 0,31 0,30 0,30 0,35

Andorra 6 8 8 6 87 85 85 85 0,69 0,94 0,94 0,71

Armenia 125 197 173 238 3238 3249 3263 3274 0,39 0,61 0,53 0,73

Austria 410 439 387 376 8355 8375 8404 8443 0,49 0,52 0,46 0,45

Azerbaijan 361 337 527 342 8897 8998 9111 9235 0,41 0,37 0,58 0,37

Belgium 256 304 252 268 10753 10840 11001 11041 0,24 0,28 0,23 0,24

Bosnia and

Herzegovina621 658 508 430 3844 3844 3843 3829 1,62 1,71 1,32 1,12

Bulgaria 1194 1348 1200 1276 7607 7564 7369 7327 1,57 1,78 1,63 1,74

Croatia 755 992 1192 1912 4435 4426 4412 4398 1,70 2,24 2,70 4,35

Cyprus 59 118 69 79 797 819 840 862 0,74 1,44 0,82 0,92

Czech Republic 726 606 522 547 10468 10507 10487 10505 0,69 0,58 0,50 0,52

Denmark 63 96 111 103 5511 5535 5561 5581 0,11 0,17 0,20 0,18

Estonia 204 265 346 301 1340 1340 1340 1340 1,52 1,98 2,58 2,25

Finland 489 377 432 317 5326 5351 5375 5401 0,92 0,70 0,80 0,59

France 1589 1619 1598 1347 64350 64694 65048 65398 0,25 0,25 0,25 0,21

Georgia 2122 375 395 367 4385 4436 4469 4498 4,84 0,85 0,88 0,82

Germany 1515 1683 1758 1494 82002 81802 81752 81844 0,18 0,21 0,22 0,18

Greece 518 585 668 722 11260 11305 11310 11291 0,46 0,52 0,59 0,64

Hungary 449 436 656 738 10030 10014 9986 9958 0,45 0,44 0,66 0,74

Iceland 10 15 10 10 319 318 318 320 0,31 0,47 0,31 0,31

Ireland 62 62 54 55 4450 4468 4570 4583 0,14 0,14 0,12 0,12

Italy 3624 3852 4714 3253 60045 60340 60626 60821 0,60 0,64 0,78 0,53

Latvia 326 271 291 286 2261 2248 2075 2042 1,44 1,21 1,40 1,40

Liechtenstein 14 15 9 16 36 36 36 36 3,92 4,17 2,50 4,44

Lithuania 261 242 305 373 3350 3329 3053 3008 0,78 0,73 1,00 1,24

Luxemburg 29 44 24 31 493 502 512 525 0,59 0,88 0,47 0,59

Malta 14 23 22 26 414 414 415 416 0,34 0,56 0,53 0,63

Republic of Moldova 1322 945 1021 938 3568 3564 3560 3560 3,71 2,65 2,87 2,63

Monaco 9 13 8 5 33 33 33 36 2,73 3,94 2,42 1,39

Montenegro 269 305 314 180 630 616 618 618 4,27 4,95 5,08 2,91

Netherlands 500 727 800 675 16486 16575 16656 16730 0,30 0,44 0,48 0,40

Norway 79 86 155 101 4799 4858 4920 4986 0,16 0,18 0,32 0,20

Poland 4986 5777 5023 4077 38136 38167 38530 38538 1,31 1,51 1,30 1,06

Portugal 152 186 164 217 10627 10638 10572 10542 0,14 0,17 0,16 0,21

Romania 5260 5992 5130 6790 21499 21462 21414 21356 2,45 2,79 2,40 3,18

Russia 13666 14309 12455 10755 141904 141915 142857 143056 0,96 1,01 0,87 0,75

San Marino 2 4 0 1 31 31 32 32 0,65 1,29 0,00 0,31

Serbia 1576 1566 3726 4900 7335 7307 7276 7241 2,15 2,14 5,12 6,77

Slovak Republic 569 568 553 531 5412 5425 5392 5404 1,05 1,05 1,03 0,98

Slovenia 598 837 424 422 2032 2047 2050 2055 2,94 4,09 2,07 2,05

Spain 641 689 807 694 45828 45989 46153 46196 0,14 0,15 0,17 0,15

Sweden 367 901 1942 545 9256 9341 9416 9483 0,40 0,96 2,06 0,57

Switzerland 471 368 358 325 7702 7786 7870 7955 0,61 0,47 0,45 0,41

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia"489 422 376 354 2049 2053 2057 2060 2,39 2,06 1,83 1,72

Turkey 4474 5821 8668 9098 71517 72561 73723 74724 0,63 0,80 1,18 1,22

Ukraine 4693 3962 4618 7796 45963 45783 45598 45453 1,02 0,87 1,01 1,72

United Kingdom 1133 2766 1547 1734 61595 62027 62499 62990 0,18 0,45 0,25 0,28

Total 57157 61307 64405 65162 813640 816202 819319 822271 0,70 0,75 0,79 0,79

SOURCES 2011 et 2012: Internet sites of the Eurostat service (“Population and social conditions” ) or from the United Nations Statistics Division.

Applications allocated to a

judicial formation

Population

(1000)

Allocated/population

(10000)

The Council of Europe member States had a combined population of about 822 million

inhabitants on 1 January 2012. The average number of applications allocated per 10,000

inhabitants was 0.79 in 2012.

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 12/60

Table 3 The Court’s total caseload by stage of proceedings and judicial formation

State

Single Judge

or Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

Chamber or

Committee -

awaiting first

examination

(cat. I - V)

Communicated

Pending

Government

action

Admissible TOTAL

Albania 117 160 95 7 379

Andorra 3 1 1 1 6

Armenia 145 745 53 7 950

Austria 236 93 70 8 407

Azerbaijan 168 1036 87 8 1299

Belgium 25 286 40 8 359

Bosnia and Herzegovina 1151 228 42 22 1443

Bulgaria 2804 872 126 27 3829

Croatia 667 477 73 15 1232

Cyprus 100 43 46 1 190

Czech Republic 739 149 54 19 961

Denmark 16 5 5 1 27

Estonia 590 33 16 0 639

Finland 116 38 31 3 188

France 1050 337 137 15 1539

Georgia 400 2305 168 10 2883

Germany 1880 100 29 4 2013

Greece 114 745 200 19 1078

Hungary 1276 466 94 13 1849

Iceland 11 0 2 0 13

Ireland 10 6 8 1 25

Italy 1954 11219 965 49 14187

Latvia 318 120 83 12 533

Liechtenstein 11 2 1 0 14

Lithuania 99 76 67 4 246

Luxembourg 5 0 2 0 7

Malta 4 14 13 6 37

Republic of Moldova 2373 613 211 42 17 3256

Monaco 1 1 4 0 6

Montenegro 676 137 30 5 848

Netherlands 705 295 61 1 1062

Norway 46 6 8 1 61

Poland 393 2363 306 43 3105

Portugal 98 59 56 4 217

Romania 3021 1345 1330 2971 45 8712

Russia 22322 3982 2013 210 71 28598

San Marino 0 1 1 0 2

Serbia 2986 6105 928 34 10053

Slovakia 264 142 58 17 481

Slovenia 1972 109 122 15 2218

Spain 497 88 63 5 653

Sweden 20 27 58 5 110

Switzerland 790 172 63 5 1030

"The former Yugoslav

Republic of Macedonia"375 235 124 2 736

Turkey 3430 11446 1935 65 16876

Ukraine 5357 2284 1243 1332 230 10446

United Kingdom 678 2517 92 21 3308

ALL STATES 60013 51483 11214 4555 846 128111

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 13/60

Table 4 Unilateral declarations and friendly settlements in 2011 and 2012

State

2011 2012 2011 2012

Albania 1 2 0 1

Andorra 0 0 0 0

Armenia 6 2 0 0

Austria 0 0 8 1

Azerbaijan 1 0 2 1

Belgium 1 0 0 0

Bosnia and Herzegovina 0 3 78 43

Bulgaria 5 28 9 85

Croatia 0 6 11 18

Cyprus 0 0 0 0

Czech Republic 0 7 10 4

Denmark 0 0 0 6

Estonia 0 0 2 0

Finland 1 4 2 8

France 1 4 7 2

Georgia 0 1 2 4

Germany 0 1 1 2

Greece 0 0 14 3

Hungary 0 2 45 53

Iceland 0 0 0 0

Ireland 0 0 2 1

Italy 0 0 7 117

Latvia 1 1 3 1

Liechtenstein 1 0 0 0

Lithuania 1 0 0 0

Luxembourg 0 0 0 0

Malta 0 2 0 0

Republic of Moldova 62 5 15 13

Monaco 0 0 0 1

Montenegro 0 0 0 1

Netherlands 0 0 0 1

Norway 0 0 0 0

Poland 44 40 154 111

Portugal 5 1 12 10

Romania 30 61 21 35

Russia 205 100 12 3

San Marino 1 1 1

Serbia 10 3 69 415

Slovakia 2 3 29 9

Slovenia 2 0 0 1

Spain 0 0 0 0

Sweden 0 0 0 1

Switzerland 0 0 0 0The former Yugoslav Republic

of Macedonia' 12 1 28 67

Turkey 39 14 115 99

Ukraine 262 313 161 178

United Kingdom 10 2 9 7

Grand Total 703 606 829 1303

Unilateral declaration Friendly settlement

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 14/60

Country-specific information

Albania

Figure 9 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

160

42%

Communicated

95

25%

Admissible

7

2%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

117

31%

Total applications

379

Figure 10 Major procedural steps in processing applications

96

2017

9

85

46

17

5

111

58

39

10

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 15/60

Andorra

Figure 11 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Admissible

1

17%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

1

17%

Communicated

1

17%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

3

49%

Total applications

6

Figure 12 Major procedural steps in processing applications

8

3

1

0

8

4

2

0

6

15

0

2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 16/60

Armenia

Figure 13 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

745

78%

Communicated

53

6%

Admissible

7

0,7%Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

145

15%

Total applications

950

Figure 14 Major procedural steps in processing applications

197

81

155

173

144

16

5

238229

11 16

0

50

100

150

200

250

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 17/60

Austria

Figure 15 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

236

58%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

93

23%

Communicated

70

17%

Admissible

8

2%

Total applications

407

Figure 16 Major procedural steps in processing applications

439

510

23 19

387

334

21 18

376

549

14 23

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 18/60

Azerbaijan

Figure 17 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

1036

79,8%

Communicated

87

6,7%

Admissible

8

0,6%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

168

12,9%

Total applications

1 299

Figure 18 Major procedural steps in processing applications

337

167

49 23

527

6245

25

342

694

34 37

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 19/60

Belgium

Figure 19 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

286

80%

Communicated

40

11%

Admissible

8

2%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

25

7%

Total applications

359

Figure 20 Major procedural steps in processing applications

304

69

30

4

252265

189

268

468

276

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

500

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 20/60

Bosnia and Herzegovina

Figure 21 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1151

79%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

228

16%

Communicated

42

3%

Admissible

22

2%

Total applications

1 443

Figure 22 Major procedural steps in processing applications

658

1393

142

1

508

410

79 33

430 361

29 12

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 21/60

Bulgaria

Figure 23 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

872

23%

Communicated

126

3%

Admissible

27

1%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

2804

73%

Total applications

3 829

Figure 24 Major procedural steps in processing applications

1348

525

92 84

1200

543

14173

1276

1425

85 72

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 22/60

Croatia

Figure 25 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

477

39%

Communicated

73

6%

Admissible

15

1%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

667

54%

Total applications

1 232

Figure 26 Major procedural steps in processing applications

992

357

55 21

1192

1014

65 49

1912

2392

59 22

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 23/60

Cyprus

Figure 27 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

100

52%

Admissible

1

1%Communicated

46

24%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

43

23%Total applications

190

Figure 28 Major procedural steps in processing applications

118

57

9

3

69

43

39

3

79

55

20

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 24/60

Czech Republic

Figure 29 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Admissible

19

2%

Communicated

54

6%Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

149

16%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

739

76%Total applications

961

Figure 30 Major procedural steps in processing applications

606

1367

5912

522

588

46 29

547

773

43 30

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 25/60

Denmark

Figure 31 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Communicated

5

19%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

5

19%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

16

58%

Admissible

1

4%

Total applications

27

Figure 32 Major procedural steps in processing applications

96

36

26

0

11199

166

103

201

8 1

0

50

100

150

200

250

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 26/60

Estonia

Figure 33 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

590

92,3%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

33

5,2%

Communicated

16

2,5%

Total applications

639

Figure 34 Major procedural steps in processing applications

265

183

11 3

346

229

123

301

269

8 8

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 27/60

Finland

Figure 35 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

116

61,7%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

38

20,2%

Communicated

31

16,5%

Admissible

3

1,6%

Total applications

188

Figure 36 Major procedural steps in processing applications

377

214

29 17

432

485

247

317

615

24 5

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 28/60

France

Figure 37 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1050

68%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

337

22%

Communicated

137

9%Admissible

15

1%

Total applications

1 539

Figure 38 Major procedural steps in processing applications

1619

1367

90 44

1598 1485

10532

1347

2518

45 32

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 29/60

Georgia

Figure 39 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

2305

80%

Communicated

168

6%

Admissible

10

0,3%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

400

14%

Total applications

2 883

Figure 40 Major procedural steps in processing applications

375

1608

44 4

395

160

51 4

367

521

30 12

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 30/60

Germany

Figure 41 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1880

94%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

100

5%

Communicated

29

1%

Admissible

4

0%

Total applications

2 013

Figure 42 Major procedural steps in processing applications

1683

1544

45 47

1758

1095

32 46

1494

2468

22 23

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 31/60

Greece

Figure 43 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

114

11%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

745

68%

Communicated

200

19%

Admissible

19

2%

Total applications

1 078

Figure 44 Major procedural steps in processing applications

585

383

128

60

668

179

112 73

722

861

93

58

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 32/60

Hungary

Figure 45 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

466

25%

Communicated

94

5%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1276

69%

Admissible

13

0,7%

Total applications

1 849

Figure 46 Major procedural steps in processing applications

436

240

79

21

656

224

99

34

738

840

106

27

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 33/60

Iceland

Figure 47 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

11

85%

Communicated

2

15%

Total applications

13

Figure 48 Major procedural steps in processing applications

15

8

2

1

10

14

0 0

10 10

2 2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 34/60

Ireland

Figure 49 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

10

40%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

6

24%

Communicated

8

32%

Admissible

1

4%

Total applications

25

Figure 50 Major procedural steps in processing applications

62

76

22

54

77

42

55

63

8

2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 35/60

Italy

Figure 51 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

11219

79%

Communicated

965

7%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1954

14%

Admissible

49

0,3%

Total applications

14 187

Figure 52 Major procedural steps in processing applications

3852

687220 668

4714

556

21484

3253

2693

149 122

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 36/60

Latvia

Figure 53 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

318

59%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

120

23%

Communicated

83

16%

Admissible

12

2%

Total applications

533

Figure 54 Major procedural steps in processing applications

271 273

45

4

291 300

30

12

286 296

16 14

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 37/60

Liechtenstein

Figure 55 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

11

79%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

2

14%

Communicated

1

7%

Total applications

14

Figure 56 Major procedural steps in processing applications

15 15

01

9

10

2

0

16

15

0 0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 38/60

Lithuania

Figure 57 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

99

40%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

76

31%

Communicated

67

27%

Admissible

4

2%

Total applications

246

Figure 58 Major procedural steps in processing applications

242

153

15 8

305

152

22 10

373

705

26 12

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 39/60

Luxembourg

Figure 59 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

5

71%

Communicated

2

29%

Total applications

7

Figure 60 Major procedural steps in processing applications

44

39

4 7

24

66

2 3

3130

1 2

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 40/60

Malta

Figure 61 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Admissible

6

16%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

4

11%

Communicated

13

35%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

14

38%Total applications

37

Figure 62 Major procedural steps in processing applications

23

14

12

4

22

6

4

13

26

20

13

3

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 41/60

Republic of Moldova

Figure 63 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

613

19%

Communicated

211

6%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

2373

73%

Admissible

17

1%

Pending Government

action

42

1%

Total applications

3 256

Figure 64 Major procedural steps in processing applications

945

434

135

29

1021

550

11842

938

1905

56 32

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

1800

2000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 42/60

Monaco

Figure 65 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1

17%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

1

17%

Communicated

4

66%

Total applications

6

Figure 66 Major procedural steps in processing applications

13

7

0 0

8

14

1

0

5

7

5

0

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 43/60

Montenegro

Figure 67 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

676

79%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

137

16%

Communicated

30

4%

Admissible

5

1%

Total applications

848

Figure 68 Major procedural steps in processing applications

305

45

28

2

314

135

24

8

180 181

415

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 44/60

Netherlands

Figure 69 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

295

28%

Communicated

61

6%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

705

66%

Admissible

1

0,1%

Total applications

1 062

Figure 70 Major procedural steps in processing applications

727

299

314

800

485

27 6

675

859

37 7

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 45/60

Norway

Figure 71 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

46

75%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

6

10%

Communicated

8

13%

Admissible

1

2%

Total applications

61

Figure 72 Major procedural steps in processing applications

86

76

91

155

102

4 1

101

165

2 4

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 46/60

Poland

Figure 73 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

393

12,7%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

2363

76,1%

Communicated

306

9,9%

Admissible

43

1,4%

Total applications

3 105

Figure 74 Major procedural steps in processing applications

5777

3924

315108

5023 5038

24772

4077

7283

192 74

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 47/60

Portugal

Figure 75 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

98

45%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

59

27%

Communicated

56

26%

Admissible

4

2%

Total applications

217

Figure 76 Major procedural steps in processing applications

186

116

61

35

164

123

35

48

217

239

37

25

0

50

100

150

200

250

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 48/60

Romania

Figure 77 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Admissible

45

0,5%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

3021

35%

Pending Government

action

2971

34%

Communicated

1330

15%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

1345

15%Total applications

8 712

Figure 78 Major procedural steps in processing applications

5992

3650

422150

5130

4585

916

105

6790

10066

439155

0

2000

4000

6000

8000

10000

12000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 49/60

Russia

Figure 79 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Admissible

71

0,2%

Pending Government

action

210

0,7%Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

3982

14%

Communicated

2013

7%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

22322

78%

Total applications

28 598

Figure 80 Major procedural steps in processing applications

14309

6911

721430

1245512223

734199

10755

22142

796216

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 50/60

San Marino

Figure 81 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Communicated

1

50%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

1

50%

Total applications

2

Figure 82 Major procedural steps in processing applications

4

5 5

0 0

3 3

1 1 1

0

1

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 51/60

Serbia

Figure 83 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

2986

30%

Admissible

34

0,3%

Communicated

928

9%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

6105

61%

Total applications

10 053

Figure 84 Major procedural steps in processing applications

1566

1195

132 38

3726

449451

12

4900

1599

905

39

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

4500

5000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 52/60

Slovakia

Figure 85 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

264

54%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

142

30%

Communicated

58

12%

Admissible

17

4%

Total applications

481

Figure 86 Major procedural steps in processing applications

568

664

129

41

553

694

96

21

531

1079

4323

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 53/60

Slovenia

Figure 87 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

109

5%

Communicated

122

6%Admissible

15

0,7%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

1972

88%

Total applications

2 218

Figure 88 Major procedural steps in processing applications

837

581

328

6

424

517

90

16

422

1517

90

22

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

1400

1600

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 54/60

Spain

Figure 89 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

497

76%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

88

13%

Communicated

63

10%

Admissible

5

1%

Total applications

653

Figure 90 Major procedural steps in processing applications

689

454

11 16

807

871

4615

694

895

26 11

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 55/60

Sweden

Figure 91 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

27

25%

Communicated

58

52%

Admissible

5

5%

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

20

18%

Total applications

110

Figure 92 Major procedural steps in processing applications

901

283

13 6

1942

2586

384

545

894

32 15

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 56/60

Switzerland

Figure 93 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

790

77%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

172

17%

Communicated

63

6%

Admissible

5

0,5%

Total applications

1 030

Figure 94 Major procedural steps in processing applications

368

305

30

11

358

130

13 11

325

341

238

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 57/60

“The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”

Figure 95 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

375

51%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

235

32%

Communicated

124

17%

Admissible

2

0,3%

Total applications

736

Figure 96 Major procedural steps in processing applications

422 456

95

15

376 380

38

6

354

618

155

8

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 58/60

Turkey

Figure 97 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

3430

20%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

11446

69%

Communicated

1935

11%

Admissible

65

0%

Total applications

16 876

Figure 98 Major procedural steps in processing applications

5821

3296

1311

501

8668

7527

458229

9098

7914

422134

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

9000

10000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 59/60

Ukraine

Figure 99 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

2284

22%

Communicated

1243

12%

Pending Government

action

1332

13%Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

5357

51%

Admissible

230

2,2%

Total applications

10 446

Figure 100 Major procedural steps in processing applications

3962

3311

1587

119

4618

4647

743

107

7796

7305

1032

301

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered

ECHR – Analysis of Statistics 2012 60/60

United Kingdom

Figure 101 The Court’s caseload by stage of proceedings and decision body

Single Judge or

Committee

(cat. VI - VII)

678

20%

Chamber or Committee -

awaiting first examination

(cat. I - V)

2517

76%

Communicated

92

3%

Admissible

21

1%

Total applications

3 308

Figure 102 Major procedural steps in processing applications

2766

1175

68 23

1547

1028

60 30

1734

2047

48 35

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

2010 2011 2012

Applications allocated to a judicialformation

Applications declared inadmissibleor struck out

Applications communicated to theGovernment

Applications in which judgmentsdelivered