analysis of the results of the unece questionnaire on valuing unpaid household service work dominic...
DESCRIPTION
The questionnaire* 33 countries responded to survey. 14 countries estimate the value of unpaid work. (3 measure physical units). Answered questions regarding: o Timeliness of estimates o Methodologies o Future intentions *Results reflect comments from MexicoTRANSCRIPT
Analysis of the results of the UNECE Questionnaire on valuing unpaid household service work
Dominic Webber, Office for National Statistics, UK
Contents
• The questionnaire
• Analysis of results
• Recommendations
• Discussion
The questionnaire*
• 33 countries responded to survey.
• 14 countries estimate the value of unpaid work. (3 measure physical units).
• Answered questions regarding:o Timeliness of estimateso Methodologieso Future intentions
*Results reflect comments from Mexico
Key findings
1. Disparity in the frequency of results.
2. Most countries opt for mix of monetary and physical values.
3. 87% of countries used a Time Use Survey.
4. Only 7 (37%) countries have future plans to value unpaid work.
Timeliness of estimates
Annua
l
Biannu
al
Every
4 yea
rs
4 yea
rs
5 yea
rs
6 yea
rs
7 yea
rs
8 yea
rs
9 yea
rs
10 ye
ars
In ac
corda
nce w
ith TUS/ot
her s
urvey
Resou
rce de
pend
ent
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
Methodology - Activities within scope
• Family care (adult and child).• Food management.• Housekeeping (cleaning, garden and vehicle
maintenance, and pet care).• Travel and transport.• Voluntary work.
Methodology - Type of estimation
Physical units
Monetary values
Production and income generation accounts
Full sequence of accounts
Other
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
Methodology - Analysis of approaches
Input approach, opportunity cost approachInput approach, RCA using wages of specialist workers in market en-terprisesInput approach, RCA using wages if specialist workers at homeInput approach, RCA using wages of generalist workersOutput approach, average market pricesOutput approach, average market price adjusted for qualityOther
Recommendations - Production boundary
Adult careChild careNutritionHousekeeping (incl. garden)TransportVoluntary work
• Do the TF agree with these? Is there anything missing?
Recommendations – Methodological approaches
• No single approach is seen as preferable. • Recommend:
Guidance should be clear on strengths and weaknesses all approaches.
Availability of data should be main guide for decision on which approach to take.
Encourage, where possible, estimation using both input and output approaches to allow greater sensitivity analysis.
Recommendations - Extent of account
• Most countries only estimate monetary values.
• Recommendation:Countries should aim at a minimum to provide
monetary estimates.Guidance should explain the steps to creating a
full sequence of accounts.
Other issues for discussion
• Multi-tasking? • What wage rate to use in the RCA?• What coverage don’t we have? E.g. internet
services.• How can countries make sure they’re
measuring relevant activities? • How can we make sure that we don’t miss
relevant activities?
Thank you
Questions and discussion