analyzing recyclable solid wastes in tabriz university of

7
Depiction of Health 2018; 9(1): 39-45 http://dohweb.tbzmed.ac.ir Original Article Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Campus Reza Dehghanzadeh Rayhani 1 , Ahmad Aslhashemi* 2 , Hanyeh Alizadeh 3 Abstract Background and Objectives: Integrated solid waste management is one of the biggest environmental challenges facing the public and private institutions. This requires knowledge of the composition and sources of waste production. The aim of this study was to determine the quality and quantity of common waste at the faculty of health and nutrition and medical schools. Material and Methods: This study was a cross sectional and descriptive study on the point of all- waste generated in both schools. A total of 24 samples were taken and weighted from each school. Data were analyzed with SPSS and Excel. T-test was used for comparison of means following normality test of the data. Results: Average of waste produced at faculties of health and nutrition and medicine were 37±7 and 30±3 kg per day, respectively. Paper and metals were the highest and lowest part of solid waste, respectively with daily average of 15 and 2 kg. Paper is accounted about 40 to 45 percent by weight of the total waste. Per capita waste production in the faculty of health and nutrition is nearly twice faculty of medicine. The total waste per capita of university was estimated at about 15 kg per person per year. Conclusion: University solid waste per capita, especially the amount of paper, is high compared with the other researches. The highest amount of waste material examined in this study is recyclable at source. Training programs and changes in attitude and practice must be applied for students and staff to produce less waste to protect environment and natural resource and create a green university. 1. Health and Environment Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran 2. Health and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Email: [email protected]) 3. Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran © 2018 The Author(s). This work is published by Depiction of Health as an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited. Citation: Dehghanzadeh Rayhani R, Aslhashemi A, Alizadeh H. Analyzing of Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Campus. Depiction of Health 2018; 9(1): 39-45. Article Info: Article History: Received: 2018/03/11 Accepted: 2018/04/17 Published: 2018/06/20 Keywords: Solid Waste Composition Quantity and Quality Discarded Paper Faculty University

Upload: others

Post on 10-Feb-2022

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

Depiction of Health

2018; 9(1): 39-45

http://dohweb.tbzmed.ac.ir

Original Article

Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Campus

Reza Dehghanzadeh Rayhani1, Ahmad Aslhashemi*2, Hanyeh Alizadeh3

Abstract Background and Objectives: Integrated solid waste management is one of the biggest

environmental challenges facing the public and private institutions. This requires knowledge of

the composition and sources of waste production. The aim of this study was to determine the

quality and quantity of common waste at the faculty of health and nutrition and medical schools.

Material and Methods: This study was a cross sectional and descriptive study on the point of all-

waste generated in both schools. A total of 24 samples were taken and weighted from each school.

Data were analyzed with SPSS and Excel. T-test was used for comparison of means following

normality test of the data.

Results: Average of waste produced at faculties of health and nutrition and medicine were 37±7 and

30±3 kg per day, respectively. Paper and metals were the highest and lowest part of solid waste,

respectively with daily average of 15 and 2 kg. Paper is accounted about 40 to 45 percent by weight

of the total waste. Per capita waste production in the faculty of health and nutrition is nearly twice

faculty of medicine. The total waste per capita of university was estimated at about 15 kg per person

per year.

Conclusion: University solid waste per capita, especially the amount of paper, is high compared

with the other researches. The highest amount of waste material examined in this study is

recyclable at source. Training programs and changes in attitude and practice must be applied for

students and staff to produce less waste to protect environment and natural resource and create

a green university.

1. Health and Environment Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

2. Health and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Email: [email protected])

3. Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran

© 2018 The Author(s). This work is published by Depiction of Health as an open access article distributed under the

terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the

work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.

Citation: Dehghanzadeh Rayhani R, Aslhashemi A, Alizadeh H. Analyzing of Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

Medical Sciences Campus. Depiction of Health 2018; 9(1): 39-45.

Article Info:

Article History:Received: 2018/03/11 Accepted: 2018/04/17

Published: 2018/06/20

Keywords:Solid Waste Composition

Quantity and Quality

Discarded Paper

Faculty

University

Page 2: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

*

SPSSExcel

:

.

(Email: [email protected])

.

(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/bync/4.0/

Page 3: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45

)(

SPSS

Excel

Page 4: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

زائدات مواد

غذايي

22%

کاغذ و مقوا

45%

پلاستیک

23%

پارچه و پنبه

4%

فلز

4%

شیشه

2%

پزشكي

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

ز رو

در له

زباار

قدم

(رم

وگکیل

)

بهداشت و تغذيه پزشكي

زائدات مواد

غذايي

28%

کاغذ و مقوا

40%

پلاستیک

22%

پارچه و پنبه

3%

فلز

1%

شیشه

6%

بهداشت و تغذيه

Page 5: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45

Page 6: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

References 1. Smyth DP, Fredeen AL, Booth AL. Reducing solid

waste in higher education: The first step towards

‘greening’ a university campus. Resources, Conservation

and Recycling. 2010;54(11):1007-16.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.008

2. Nemerow NL, Agardy FJ. Solid Waste Management.

Environmental engineering: Environmental health and

safety for municipal infrastructure, land use and

planning, and industry. John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2008:

177.

Page 7: Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of

Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45

3. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC.

Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities - A

review. Waste management (New York, NY).

2008;28(2):459-67. PMID:17433664

doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008

4. Armijo de Vega C, Ojeda Benitez S, Ramirez Barreto

ME. Solid waste characterization and recycling potential

for a university campus. Waste management (New York,

NY). 2008;28 Suppl 1:S21-6. PMID:18572396

doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.022

5. Keniry J, National Wildlife F. Ecodemia: Campus

environmental stewardship at the turn of the 21st century:

Lessons in smart management from administrators, staff,

and students. National Wildlife Federation. 1995: 180.

6. Creighton SH, Greening the ivory tower: Improving the

environmental track record of universities, colleges and

other institutions. The MIT Press. 1998: 9-49.

7. Almut B, Tarah W, Leslie M. Sustainability in higher

education in Atlantic Canada. International Journal of

Sustainability in Higher Education. 2008;9(1):48-67.

doi:doi:10.1108/14676370810842184

8. Maldonado L. The economics of urban solid waste

reduction in educational institutions in Mexico: A 3-year

experience. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

2006;48(1):41-55.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.007

9. Mason IG, Brooking AK, Oberender A, Harford JM,

Horsley PG. Implementation of a zero waste program at

a university campus. Resources, Conservation and

Recycling. 2003;38(4):257-69.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00147-7

10. Mason IG, Oberender A, Brooking AK. Source

separation and potential re-use of resource residuals at a

university campus. Resources, Conservation and

Recycling. 2004;40(2):155-72.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00068-5

11. Mbuligwe SE. Institutional solid waste management

practices in developing countries: a case study of three

academic institutions in Tanzania. Resources,

Conservation and Recycling. 2002;35(3):131-46.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00113-6

12. REMP. Resource and Environmental Management

Program. Ithaca College, USA, Available at:

http://www.ithaca.edu/remp. 2003.

13. Malakahmad A., Nasir M., Mohammed Kutty SR. and

Hasnain Isa M. Solid waste characterization and

recycling potential for University Technology

PETRONAS academic buildings. American Journal of

Environmental Sciences 2010; 6(5): 422-427.

14. Culler WW. State Agencies, Colleges and Universities

Waste Reduction, Recycling and Buy Recycled. 2002

Annual Report. SC Department of Health and

Environmental Control. Office of Solid Waste Reduction

and Recycling. South Carolina, USA. 2003.

15. Kelly TC, Mason IG, Leiss MW, Ganesh S. University

community responses to on-campus resource recycling.

Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2006;47(1):42-

55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.002

16. Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V. Municipal solid waste

disposal in Portugal. Waste Management.

17. 2006;26(12):1477-89.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.009

18. Agarwal A, Singhmar A, Kulshrestha M, Mittal AK.

Municipal solid waste recycling and associated markets

in Delhi, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

2005;44(1):73-90.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.007

19. Metin E, Eröztürk A, Neyim C. Solid waste management

practices and review of recovery and recycling

operations in Turkey. Waste Management.

2003;23(5):425-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-

053X(03)00070-9

20. Leu H-G, H. Lin S. Cost–benefit analysis of resource

material recycling. Resources, Conservation and

Recycling. 1998;23(3):183-92.

doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00020-2