analyzing recyclable solid wastes in tabriz university of
TRANSCRIPT
Depiction of Health
2018; 9(1): 39-45
http://dohweb.tbzmed.ac.ir
Original Article
Analyzing Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Campus
Reza Dehghanzadeh Rayhani1, Ahmad Aslhashemi*2, Hanyeh Alizadeh3
Abstract Background and Objectives: Integrated solid waste management is one of the biggest
environmental challenges facing the public and private institutions. This requires knowledge of
the composition and sources of waste production. The aim of this study was to determine the
quality and quantity of common waste at the faculty of health and nutrition and medical schools.
Material and Methods: This study was a cross sectional and descriptive study on the point of all-
waste generated in both schools. A total of 24 samples were taken and weighted from each school.
Data were analyzed with SPSS and Excel. T-test was used for comparison of means following
normality test of the data.
Results: Average of waste produced at faculties of health and nutrition and medicine were 37±7 and
30±3 kg per day, respectively. Paper and metals were the highest and lowest part of solid waste,
respectively with daily average of 15 and 2 kg. Paper is accounted about 40 to 45 percent by weight
of the total waste. Per capita waste production in the faculty of health and nutrition is nearly twice
faculty of medicine. The total waste per capita of university was estimated at about 15 kg per person
per year.
Conclusion: University solid waste per capita, especially the amount of paper, is high compared
with the other researches. The highest amount of waste material examined in this study is
recyclable at source. Training programs and changes in attitude and practice must be applied for
students and staff to produce less waste to protect environment and natural resource and create
a green university.
1. Health and Environment Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2. Health and Environment Research Center, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran (Email: [email protected])
3. Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
© 2018 The Author(s). This work is published by Depiction of Health as an open access article distributed under the
terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Non-commercial uses of the
work are permitted, provided the original work is properly cited.
Citation: Dehghanzadeh Rayhani R, Aslhashemi A, Alizadeh H. Analyzing of Recyclable Solid Wastes in Tabriz University of
Medical Sciences Campus. Depiction of Health 2018; 9(1): 39-45.
Article Info:
Article History:Received: 2018/03/11 Accepted: 2018/04/17
Published: 2018/06/20
Keywords:Solid Waste Composition
Quantity and Quality
Discarded Paper
Faculty
University
Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45
)(
SPSS
Excel
زائدات مواد
غذايي
22%
کاغذ و مقوا
45%
پلاستیک
23%
پارچه و پنبه
4%
فلز
4%
شیشه
2%
پزشكي
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
ز رو
در له
زباار
قدم
(رم
وگکیل
)
بهداشت و تغذيه پزشكي
زائدات مواد
غذايي
28%
کاغذ و مقوا
40%
پلاستیک
22%
پارچه و پنبه
3%
فلز
1%
شیشه
6%
بهداشت و تغذيه
Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45
References 1. Smyth DP, Fredeen AL, Booth AL. Reducing solid
waste in higher education: The first step towards
‘greening’ a university campus. Resources, Conservation
and Recycling. 2010;54(11):1007-16.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2010.02.008
2. Nemerow NL, Agardy FJ. Solid Waste Management.
Environmental engineering: Environmental health and
safety for municipal infrastructure, land use and
planning, and industry. John Wiley & Sons Inc. 2008:
177.
Depiction of Health, 2018; 9(1): 39-45
3. Sharholy M, Ahmad K, Mahmood G, Trivedi RC.
Municipal solid waste management in Indian cities - A
review. Waste management (New York, NY).
2008;28(2):459-67. PMID:17433664
doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2007.02.008
4. Armijo de Vega C, Ojeda Benitez S, Ramirez Barreto
ME. Solid waste characterization and recycling potential
for a university campus. Waste management (New York,
NY). 2008;28 Suppl 1:S21-6. PMID:18572396
doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2008.03.022
5. Keniry J, National Wildlife F. Ecodemia: Campus
environmental stewardship at the turn of the 21st century:
Lessons in smart management from administrators, staff,
and students. National Wildlife Federation. 1995: 180.
6. Creighton SH, Greening the ivory tower: Improving the
environmental track record of universities, colleges and
other institutions. The MIT Press. 1998: 9-49.
7. Almut B, Tarah W, Leslie M. Sustainability in higher
education in Atlantic Canada. International Journal of
Sustainability in Higher Education. 2008;9(1):48-67.
doi:doi:10.1108/14676370810842184
8. Maldonado L. The economics of urban solid waste
reduction in educational institutions in Mexico: A 3-year
experience. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
2006;48(1):41-55.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.12.007
9. Mason IG, Brooking AK, Oberender A, Harford JM,
Horsley PG. Implementation of a zero waste program at
a university campus. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling. 2003;38(4):257-69.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(02)00147-7
10. Mason IG, Oberender A, Brooking AK. Source
separation and potential re-use of resource residuals at a
university campus. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling. 2004;40(2):155-72.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(03)00068-5
11. Mbuligwe SE. Institutional solid waste management
practices in developing countries: a case study of three
academic institutions in Tanzania. Resources,
Conservation and Recycling. 2002;35(3):131-46.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(01)00113-6
12. REMP. Resource and Environmental Management
Program. Ithaca College, USA, Available at:
http://www.ithaca.edu/remp. 2003.
13. Malakahmad A., Nasir M., Mohammed Kutty SR. and
Hasnain Isa M. Solid waste characterization and
recycling potential for University Technology
PETRONAS academic buildings. American Journal of
Environmental Sciences 2010; 6(5): 422-427.
14. Culler WW. State Agencies, Colleges and Universities
Waste Reduction, Recycling and Buy Recycled. 2002
Annual Report. SC Department of Health and
Environmental Control. Office of Solid Waste Reduction
and Recycling. South Carolina, USA. 2003.
15. Kelly TC, Mason IG, Leiss MW, Ganesh S. University
community responses to on-campus resource recycling.
Resources, Conservation and Recycling. 2006;47(1):42-
55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2005.10.002
16. Magrinho A, Didelet F, Semiao V. Municipal solid waste
disposal in Portugal. Waste Management.
17. 2006;26(12):1477-89.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2006.03.009
18. Agarwal A, Singhmar A, Kulshrestha M, Mittal AK.
Municipal solid waste recycling and associated markets
in Delhi, India. Resources, Conservation and Recycling.
2005;44(1):73-90.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.09.007
19. Metin E, Eröztürk A, Neyim C. Solid waste management
practices and review of recovery and recycling
operations in Turkey. Waste Management.
2003;23(5):425-32. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-
053X(03)00070-9
20. Leu H-G, H. Lin S. Cost–benefit analysis of resource
material recycling. Resources, Conservation and
Recycling. 1998;23(3):183-92.
doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-3449(98)00020-2