ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western colorado
DESCRIPTION
2013. Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado. 38 th Annual Colorado Water Workshop Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, CO July 17, 2013. Jeff Lukas - [email protected] Western Water Assessment CIRES, University of Colorado. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Ancient trees, climate models, and the future of drought in western Colorado
Jeff Lukas - [email protected]
Western Water AssessmentCIRES, University of Colorado
38th Annual Colorado Water Workshop Western State Colorado University, Gunnison, COJuly 17, 2013
2013
Parsing our changing climate: a conceptual model
Internal (“natural, unforced”) climate variability
+External climate forcing (Greenhouse gases, etc.)
Changing future climate
=
PAST PRESENTPRESENT FUTURE
PRESENT FUTURE
change
Drought: driven by precipitation deficit, exacerbated by high temperatures
Middle photo: Jane Stulp
Need to look back and forwards to assess future drought risk
1900 2013
Instrumental record
Climate model projections
Tree-ring record
Western Colorado annual (water year) precipitation vs. Western Colorado naturalized runoff, 1900-2012
Precip Data: NOAA NCDC, CO Division 2 data
Precipitation deficits and hydrological drought
Streamflow data: Reclamation (1906-2010); 2011-12 values estimated from preliminary Reclamation data
68
1012141618202224
1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010
Prec
ipita
tion,
in.
02468101214161820
Stre
amflo
w, M
AF
PrecipitationStreamflow
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – average year
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 40 MAF
ET : -30 MAF
Runoff: 10 MAF
(MAF = million acre-feet)
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – drought year
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 30 MAF
ET : -24 MAF
Runoff: 6 MAF
While precipitation declines only 25% vs. average year, runoff declines 40% due to ET component increasing as proportion of precipitation
(MAF = million acre-feet)
Using tree rings to reconstruct past droughts
Douglas-fir, south San Juans, CO
1977 1983
Tree growth is typically limited by moisture availability
So:– a dry year leads to a narrow growth ring– a wet year leads to a wide growth ring
Ancient trees and wood are abundant across western Colorado
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
An
nu
al F
low
, MA
F
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005
2002
1977, 2002: in the lowest 10 reconstructed annual flows since 762
Meko et al. 2007. Medieval Drought in the Upper Colorado River Basin, Geophysical Research Letters; data available at http://treeflow.info
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005, with 20-year running mean
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
Water Year
An
nu
al F
low
, M
AF
Instrumental record
Tree-ring reconstructed annual flows, Colorado River at Lees Ferry, 762-2005, with 20-year running mean
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000
Water Year
An
nu
al F
low
, M
AF
0
5
10
15
20
25
1120 1130 1140 1150 1160 1170 1180
Ann
ual f
low
, MA
F
Mid-1100s megadrought
46 of 57 years were dry
Future projections from global climate models
Jan. 2070
Temperatures – Going up!
Source: Marty Hoerling, NOAA ESRL PSD; data available from http://gdo-dcp.ucllnl.org/
1950 2000 2050 2100
50°F
60°F
Western Colorado annual temperatures - ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions scenario
Observed temp.
+4ºF by 2050
1950 2000 2050 2100
32”
16”
Western Colorado annual precipitation – ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions
Precipitation – Up? Down?
Observed precip.
Source: Marty Hoerling, NOAA ESRL PSD
Runoff – Probably down, but continued high variability!
Observed runoff
Data: http://gis.usbr.gov/Streamflow_Projections/
0
10
20
30
40
50
1950 2000 2050 2100
Annu
al R
unoff
, MAF
Upper Colorado River Basin annual runoff – ensemble of 16 GCMs, medium emissions
Western Colorado’s annual water balance – average year, median 2050 projection (+4oF, no precip change)
Image: D. Meko, U. of Arizona
Precip: 40 MAF
ET : -31 MAF
Runoff: 9 MAF
Even though precipitation doesn’t change, runoff declines ~10% to 9 MAF due to increasing ET
+
-
Projections for Western Colorado from all GCM runs used in the most recent studies
Source: Denver Water & Joint Front Range Climate Change Vulnerability Study, as printed in Kerr, Science, 25 Nov 2011
More runoff
Less runoff
Median 2050
The “new normal” in a (yet) warmer climate
• Increased evaporation and transpiration• More rain and less snow in fall and spring• Reduced spring snowpack• Earlier peak runoff • Reduced annual flows (unless precip gains cancel out)• Reduced summer soil moisture• Greater plant moisture stress and crop water use
• These are all impacts currently associated with drought…they will occur more often in a warming climate
• Any future drought will be more severe, and will tend to persist longer, for a given precipitation deficit
Don’t fixate on trend: impacts will still be most deeply felt in low-precipitation (drought) years
Middle photo: Jane Stulp
Dust-on-snow also makes snow melt sooner, and probably reduces overall runoff
• Already has significant hydrologic impact; likely to get worse in future with warming/drying of source regions
• Impacts are in same direction as those caused by warming
Photos by Chris Landry, CSAS
Future drought: expectations from tree rings, instrumental record, and climate model projections
750 1000 1250 1500 1750 2000 1950 2000 2050 21001900 2000
Take-home
• Ancient trees tell us that the natural hydroclimatic variability is larger than the last 100 years would suggest (extreme short-term droughts & megadroughts)
• The instrumental record tells us precipitation drives drought, but temperature (ET) is also a big factor
• The climate models tell us that the temperature (ET) dial will continue to get turned up, but much more uncertain about precipitation
• Drought conditions will likely be more frequent and severe in the future
• Given the uncertainties in future climate, “scenario-based” planning is more appropriate than traditional “single-target” planning
• Please contact me ([email protected]) with questions or requests for information