anecom aerotest
TRANSCRIPT
AneCom AeroTest Engineering and Test Services
for the Aero Engine and Gas Turbine Industry
Challenges of Trend Monitoring on Modular Test Setups (M. Werther, M.O. Draeger, F. Grewe)
InnoTesting 2014 – “Future Technologies and Processes for Simulation and Testing”
February 20 – 21, 2014
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 2
Content
Background Information
Trend Monitoring for Drivelines
UFFA Trend Monitor
Summary
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 3
Content
Background Information
Trend Monitoring for Drivelines
UFFA Trend Monitor
Summary
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 4
Company
Certified to EN 9100 and EN 14001
Founded 2002
Business Engineering and Testing Services for the Aero Engine and Gas Turbine Industry
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 5
• 41 customers from aviation and industrial
gas turbine industry
• More than 890 projects in 11 years
Customer Project History
„ ... Extremely high professionality profused by each member of the operative personnel involved in the test setup and execution. Excellent program management performed by the project manager... “
Customer statement
Quality. Flexibility. Solution Orientation. …… and Satisfied Customers worldwide.
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 6
Aspects of trend monitoring
• trend analysis - the attempt to see the future
• information base: real data in relation to time
• main reasons for trend analysis regarding maintenance :
scheduling maintenance
reduce downtimes
safety in operation
efficiency maintenance
short: maintenance if necessary but in time
reducing costs
• Main problems:
- sufficient data base
- consideration of boundary conditions
- unknown disturbances
Maintenance
TREND
Run
http://esol.britishcouncil.org/professional-podcasts/trend-analysis
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 7
Project History & Testbed Reliability
• 11 customers from aviation and industrial gas turbine industry:
68 test campaigns in 11 years
> 4000 test running hours accumulated in total
• Since start of operation in 2003 no impact on customer
programs on order due to facility downtime
Test facility readiness level 2012/13: > 98%
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 8
2 Compressor Test Facilities
for aero-performance testing
Drive power 18MW (24000hp)
Air flow up to 200kg/s
Split flow capability for fan testing
Min. inlet pressure 20kPa (0,2bar)
Exhaust temperature up to 650oC
Operation of Compressor Test Centre Wildau
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 9
Fan Noise Test Facility
for aero-performance testing and noise investigations
under free-field conditions
• Drive power 18MW (24000 hp)
• Air flow up to 200kg/s
• Split flow capability for fan testing
• 1000m2 anechoic chamber (200Hz – 40kHz)
• Far field microphone array
Operation of Compressor Test Centre Wildau
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 10
Modular Concept to improve Test Efficiency
• Universal test vehicle for fan noise testing, adaptable to customer requirements
• Variation of aerodynamic and acoustic configuration also in the bypass duct
– Positioning of OGV and ESS
– Variation of bypass duct geometry
– Use of hard walled and acoustic liners
– Engine specific installations (bifurcations, bleed ports, etc.)
• Comprehensive instrumentation capability
for aerodynamic and noise measurements
• Major configuration changes on the bench
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 11
Modular Concept to improve Test Efficiency
• Universal test vehicle for fan noise testing, adaptable to customer requirements
• Variation of aerodynamic and acoustic configuration also in the bypass duct
– Positioning of OGV and ESS
– Variation of bypass duct geometry
– Use of hard walled and acoustic liners
– Engine specific installations (bifurcations, bleed ports, etc.)
• Comprehensive instrumentation capability
for aerodynamic and noise measurements
• Major configuration changes on the bench
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 12
Content
Background Information
Trend Monitoring for Drivelines
UFFA Trend Monitor
Summary
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 13
Trend monitoring for motor drivelines
• Driveline is composed of the motor, gearbox, torquemeter and shaft
• Oil supply system for all bearings
• Plenty of parameters available (minimum of 100 per driveline)
A simplified assembly valid to all ACAT drivelines Oil supply system
Gear set
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 14
• Driveline is composed of the motor, gearbox, torquemeter and shaft
• Oil supply system for all bearings
• Plenty of parameters available (minimum of 100 per driveline)
Trend monitoring for motor drivelines
A simplified assembly valid to all ACAT drivelines Oil supply system
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 15
Trend monitoring for motor drivelines
• To achieve comparability Zero torque datum events (no compressor installed)
Draw a distinction between testbed & driveline parameters
Building parameter groups
• To achieve multiplexed information Determine significant parameters
Accomplish database reduction
Keep important system information
• Parameter groups segmentation
Speeds
Vibrations
Temperatures
Torques
Flow rate (oil supply and cooling system)
Parameters
Algorithms
System characteristics
Trend data of an event
Trend monitoring Visualization
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 16
• Execution Develop algorithms (physical characteristics, statistic methods) Visualization (concise)
Trend monitoring for motor drivelines
ZTD log read Data analysis Visual data
Extract for TDM
TDM log read Data analysis
Visual trend data Extract the TDM
ZTD
Eva
luation
TD
M E
valu
ation
DATA Archiv
Evaluated ZTD log
TDM log
Trend analysis file
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 17
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 18
Content
Background Information
Trend Monitoring for Drivelines
UFFA Trend Monitor
Summary
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 19
NON VARIABLE
PARTS
VARIABLE PARTS
(CUSTOMER SPECIFIC
HARDWARE)
Challenges in UFFA Trend Monitoring
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 20
• Huge data sets (about 500GB / test day)
• Generated data are sensitive (customers possession)
• No consistent operating run program
Challenges in UFFA Trend Monitoring
NON
VARIABLE
PARTS
VARIABLE PARTS
(CUSTOMER
SPECIFIC
HARDWARE)
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 21
Approach to implement the UFFA Trend Monitor
• Provide background information for the engineer
• Filter parameters independent from UFFA configuration
• Separation of customers data by
Excluding parameters non-related to machine condition
Using AneCom intern designations
• Further Requirements:
Link several test sets into one (unsteady operating run over speed intervals)
Transform, reduce and compress raw data
Automatic program run
NON
VARIABLE
PARTS
VARIABLE PARTS
(CUSTOMER
SPECIFIC
HARDWARE)
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 22
Execution of UFFA Trend Monitor
• Classified parameter list (about 30 remaining)
• Analysis concept:
Vibration signals to perform engine order and bearing analysis by using FFT
Temperatures statistic indicators
Displacement statistic indicators
Pressures (in progress)
Chip detector (quantification)
• Precise overview of analyzed information in a graphical user interface
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 23
UFFA Trend Monitor program structure
Data
dynamic measurements – raw data & config file slow-rate measurements – raw data Chip detector – laboratory test results boundary conditions UFFA configuration information
Analysis
Visualization Evaluation of test data
Save record Basic file for trend monitoring Trend monitor file Trend monitor file
Trend monitor file
Trend monitoring
Processing
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 24
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 25
Content
Background Information
Trend Monitoring for Drivelines
UFFA Trend Monitor
Summary
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 26
What has been achieved so far
• Extracting important information from test data sets
• Safety of customers data
• Visualization of data in a graphical user interface
Assemble multiple test runs in a chart
Conclusions by engineer regarding next maintenance events are possible
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 27
Outlook in trend monitoring
• Optimization of both programs
Improve user-friendliness
• Enhancement of automation
• Interpretation of life cycles by the program
• In case of UFFA: Life cycle monitoring of structure parts that are used frequently for instance standard ESS & OGV
• Implementation of bearing and oil pressure analysis
• Further development and derivations to limits out of existing data base
Limits and criteria independent from UFFA configuration
• Determination of trends (no extrapolation)
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 28
Further Discussions
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 29
Contact
AneCom AeroTest GmbH
im Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt
Freiheitstrasse 122, 15745 Wildau, Germany
www.anecom.de
Ansprechpartner
Marek Werther
Group Leader Measurement
Telefon +49 (0) 3375 92 26 73
Mail: [email protected]
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 30
© AneCom AeroTest GmbH. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary
document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole
property of AneCom AeroTest GmbH. No intellectual property rights are
granted by the delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This
document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the
express written consent of AneCom AeroTest GmbH. This
document and its content shall not be used for any purpose other than that for
which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an
offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in
good faith. Where the supporting grounds for these statements are not shown,
AneCom AeroTest GmbH will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.
© AneCom AeroTest 2014
Innotesting 2014 Slide 31