annotated bibliography: multimodal supported writing

7
7/14/2019 Annotated Bibliography: Multimodal Supported Writing http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/annotated-bibliography-multimodal-supported-writing 1/7  Annotated Bibliography  Alberta Education. (2013). Ministerial order on student learning. Retrieved from http://education.alberta.ca/media/6950988/mostudentlearning.pdf The Ministerial Order is the fundamental document from Alberta Education (2013) implementing the vision of Inspiring Education. If we are looking at transformational tools and processes and how we can support those processes for all learners, this document and the competencies listed within, provide a vision and guidance for learning and research. One of the founding principles of the document is education in Alberta is, “based on the values of opportunity, fairness, citizenship, choice, diversity and excellence.” (Alberta Education, p. 1) This speaks to the need to provide tools and opportunities for all learners. Further to this basic principle, the foundations of “employ(ing) literacy and numeracy to create meaning” (p.2) and “apply(ing) multiple literacies: reading, writing, mathematics, technology, languages, media and personal finance” (p. 3) speak to the need to focus on literacy and writing, but also employ an expanded view of literacy. The inclusion of media and technology as literacies expand our view of writing and therefore how we can support changing digital, media infused writing through assistive technology.  Archer, A. A. (2012). Writing as design: Enabling access to academic discourse in a multimodal environment. South African Journal Of Higher Education, 26(3), 411-421. This article examines how to broaden student access to a wider range of tools and support to write in a multimodal environment. “Learning to write in part means learning how to produce well-designed print and digital texts, and learning how the design of the page contributes to rhetorical import” (p. 412). The visual spatial elements of writing, emphasis, materiality, spelling and typography, and how to teach students to consider these elements need to be

Upload: jennifer-deyenberg

Post on 19-Oct-2015

3.680 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Annotated Bibliography of articles, research and foundational documents on how to support and provide tools to learners with additional support needs as they create multimodal or media infused writing.

TRANSCRIPT

  • AnnotatedBibliography

    AlbertaEducation.(2013).Ministerialorderonstudentlearning.Retrievedfrom

    http://education.alberta.ca/media/6950988/mostudentlearning.pdf

    TheMinisterialOrderisthefundamentaldocumentfromAlbertaEducation(2013)

    implementingthevisionofInspiringEducation.Ifwearelookingattransformationaltoolsand

    processesandhowwecansupportthoseprocessesforalllearners,thisdocumentandthe

    competencieslistedwithin,provideavisionandguidanceforlearningandresearch.Oneofthe

    foundingprinciplesofthedocumentiseducationinAlbertais,basedonthevaluesof

    opportunity,fairness,citizenship,choice,diversityandexcellence.(AlbertaEducation,p.1)This

    speakstotheneedtoprovidetoolsandopportunitiesforalllearners.Furthertothisbasic

    principle,thefoundationsofemploy(ing)literacyandnumeracytocreatemeaning(p.2)and

    apply(ing)multipleliteracies:reading,writing,mathematics,technology,languages,mediaand

    personalfinance(p.3)speaktotheneedtofocusonliteracyandwriting,butalsoemployan

    expandedviewofliteracy.Theinclusionofmediaandtechnologyasliteraciesexpandourview

    ofwritingandthereforehowwecansupportchangingdigital,mediainfusedwritingthrough

    assistivetechnology.

    Archer,A.A.(2012).Writingasdesign:Enablingaccesstoacademicdiscourseinamultimodal

    environment.SouthAfricanJournalOfHigherEducation,26(3),411421.

    Thisarticleexamineshowtobroadenstudentaccesstoawiderrangeoftoolsand

    supporttowriteinamultimodalenvironment.Learningtowriteinpartmeanslearninghowto

    producewelldesignedprintanddigitaltexts,andlearninghowthedesignofthepagecontributes

    torhetoricalimport(p.412).Thevisualspatialelementsofwriting,emphasis,materiality,

    spellingandtypography,andhowtoteachstudentstoconsidertheseelementsneedtobe

  • consideredasweworkwithlearnerswithsupportneeds.Afterexaminingvisualtextelementsit

    thenmovesintographicandimageelementstocommunicateandtellstories.Thisarticletakes

    theperspectiveofconsidering,supportingandinstructingtheseelementsinHigherEducation,

    buttheprincipleseasilytransfertoaK12environment,andespeciallytothosewithprint

    difficulties.Ifweworkoncreatingmoreaccessibletextwithmorevisualelementsitcanbemore

    accessible.Thecreationofthisexpandedtextmediumisessentialtoconsider.

    Broun,L.(2009).Takethepenciloutoftheprocess.TEACHINGExceptionalChildren,42(1),

    1421.

    Anarticleexaminingthetraditionalneedtousethepencilandpaperastheprimary

    meansofcommunicatingwriting.Broun(2009)suggeststhepencilpresentsmultiplebarriers

    andoffersthekeyboardasaprimarywritingtool.Thephysicalprocessofwritingcanbesucha

    labourintensiveprocessthattheendproductdoesnotreflecttheacademicknowledgeor

    learningofthestudent.Brounviewsthelimitationsofthepencilasawritingtoolthroughthelens

    oflearnerswithAutismSpectrumDisorder(ASD)examiningthelimitationsinbraindevelopment

    thatmaybeaugmentedbyusingakeyboardtowrite,butrecognizingtherangewithinlearners

    withASD.Brounfurtherexploresstudentsthatarenonverbalandhowkeyboardslinkedwith

    speechcapabilitiescanfurtherenhancebothwritingandcommunicationskillsbyallowing

    studentstowriteandthenspeakthoughtsandcontributions.Thearticleprovidesarguments

    againstkeyboardsasaprimarywritingdeviceincludingcost,typinginstruction,equityandtime.

    Itisapassionateargument,supportedbycitedresearch,examiningourthinkingofwhattools

    andmediumsweareprovidingforlearnerswithadditionalsupportneedsandalllearners,as

    digitaltoolsareubiquitous.Thelimitationsareaviewofalearnerwithonespecificdisability,but

    theargumentcanbeappliedmoreglobally.

  • Cho,K.,&MacArthur,C.(2010).Studentrevisionwithpeerandexpertreviewing.Learningand

    Instruction,20(4),328338.

    Aresearchstudyexaminingtheeffectofdifferenttypesoffeedback,delivered

    electronically,onwriting.Twentyeightundergraduatelevelwritersreceivedfeedbackfromeither

    asingleexpert(SE),asinglepeer(SP),ormultiplepeers(MP).Howthestudentsreviseddrafts

    basedonthisfeedbackwasexamined.Itwasfoundthatstudentsmademorecontentbased

    revisionstotheirworkintheMPfeedbackgroupandthatmostoftheSEfeedbackresultedin

    lowleveleditingchanges,asopposedtocontentchanges.Itwasalsofoundacrossallgroups

    thatthemorecomplextherepairsmadetothewriting,thehigherqualitythewritingwasinthe

    end.Thestudyhaslimitationsofsamplesize,butthemethodasappliedtothisstudyandothers

    intheareaofwritingfeedbackappearstobethoughtfulandcomplete,measuringfeedback

    types,quality,andendproduct.Thelownumbersofparticipantlimitedtheamountofresultsthat

    werestatisticallysignificant.Whenexaminingwriting,feedbackisanessentialpartofthe

    process.Examininghowbesttoprovidethatfeedback,whetherbypeers,experts,multiple

    peersisvitaltoknowwhatkindsoftoolsandsupportswewillneedtoputintoplaceforour

    learners.

    Faux,F.(2005).Multimodality:Howstudentswithspecialeducationalneedscreatemultimedia

    stories.Education,Communication&Information,5(2),167181.

    Astudyanalysingtheproductionofmultimediatextsbythreestudentswithvarious

    needs,includinglowcognitivefunctionandlowselfesteem.Usingnewtoolsprovidedan

    increasedcognitiveload,buttheinterestinthetoolandsupportcapabilitiesofspellcheck,

    keyboarding,andvisualelementsbroughtmoremeaningandeasetothecompositionprocess.

  • Thepreandpostsamplesofwritingindicatedthatstudentswerechoosingtoemploythenew

    literaciesdevelopedthroughintroducingalternativewritingmethods.Faux(2005)foundthat,the

    abilitytocreateinteractiveenvironmentsnecessitatesaconsiderationofabstractconceptssuch

    astime,spaceandreaderintervention.Thisenhancementofskillsforlearnerswithadditional

    needssupportstheuseofmultimodaltextintheclassroomtoenhancelearning.Thestudyhas

    verylimitednumbers,butveryprecisedescriptionsofbenefitsandstrengthsaffordedbythe

    mediumtosupportneeds,giveshelpfulinsights.

    Klages,M.,&Clark,J.(2009).Newworldsoferrorsandexpectations:Basicwritersanddigital

    assumptions.JournalofBasicWriting(CUNY),28(1),3249.

    TwoProfessorsofEnglishataCommunityCollegeexaminewritingandtheuseof

    eportfoliosasawaytobridgethegapbetweentraditionalwritingandthewritingprocessandthe

    newdigitalageprocesslessworldofinstantpublishing.Tryingtobridgethegapbetween

    unstructuredwritingandmoreformaltraditionalwritingprocesses.Inordertobeeffectiveusers

    ofdigitalmedia,studentsmustknowhowtowriteforamultimodalenvironmenttheyareadriftin

    aworldofinstantpublishingwithouttheskillsofproficientwritersandthinkers(Klages&Clark,

    p.33).Thearticleprovidesremindersthateventhoughwritingtoolsandmediumsarechanging

    thereisstillaneedforprocessandsupportingalllearnersthroughthatchangingprocess.

    Instructionofwritingneedstoadapttochangingpublicationspeedandmethodsandweneedto

    examinehowlearnerswhorequirethemostsupportfitintothisnewworldofwritingandinstant

    publication.Thearticleisafantasticsetofprinciplestothinkthrough,withafocusonprocess

    elementsandhowtosupportthoseprocesselements.

    Jocius,R.(2013).Exploringadolescents'multimodalresponsestoTheKiteRunner:

  • Understandinghowstudentsusedigitalmediaforacademicpurposes.JournalOfMedia

    LiteracyEducation,5(1),310325.

    Anexaminationofamultimodalwritingprojectinahighschoolsetting.Theresearch

    studyexamineshowstudentschoose,useandapplytechnologytoshowtheirunderstandingof

    thenovelTheKiteRunner.Thearticlegoesintoextensivedetailaboutwhatmultimodalwritingis

    andhowitgoesbeyondthetraditionaldefinitionofwriting.Theprojectisdescribedindetail

    includingtheoptionsandchoicesgiventothestudents.Jocius(2013)thengoesontodraw

    comparisonsandhighlightstrengthsofindividualprojects,includingwherestudentsrequired

    additionalsupportwithinthemultimediatoolstocompletetheirwriting.Thearticleisstrongasit

    providesacasestudyanalysisofmultimodalwritingtogivedetailedinformationoftheprocess

    andsupportstudentsmayrequire.

    Shepard,A.T.(2014,January28).Studentgenerateddigitalmediatosupporttheliteracyskills

    ofhighschoolstudentswithautismspectrumdisorder.[Weblogpost].Retrievedfrom

    http://leadspartnership.ca/theconversation/studentgenerateddigitalmediasupportsliter

    acyautismspectrumdisorder/

    ApreliminaryresearchstudyfromShepard(2014)doingresearchforaPHDon

    supportingstudentswithASD.Studentsinjuniorandseniorhighcreatedvarioustypesofmedia

    basedtext.Shepardfoundthatstudentswerenotonlyindependentlycapableofcreating

    multimodalprojects,buttheycommunicatedmoreabouttheirlearningthanduringclass

    discussionorusingtraditionalwriting.Specificcasestudyexamplesofhowthemultimedia

    enhancedlearningopportunitiesandprovidealternativemethodsofcommunication.Supports

    andalternativetoolswhichsupportthewritingandcommunicationprocessarepresented.The

  • articleprovidesaninitialglimpseintoongoingresearchandisnotpeerreviewedyet,butasitis

    partofalargerdissertationitwillbeinthefuture.

    Vasudevan,L..(2010).Literaciesinaparticipatory,multimodalworld:Theartsandaestheticsof

    web2.0.LanguageArts,88(1),4350.

    Anarticlelookingathowdigitalmediacanbringbackart,creativity,andenhance

    imaginationinlearnersatalllevels.Vasudevan(2010)examinestheadditionofdigitaldesign

    elementstowritingasbringingmorecreativityandplayintothewritingprocess,makingitmore

    invitingandmoreaccessible.Theissuesofopenendedcreative,expressiveprojectsandwhere

    theyfitintomoretraditionalrigidclassroomandassessmentsystemsarediscussed.Shifting

    perspectivesofwritingandcreatingasplayandselfrepresentationinsteadofjustfor

    compositionandcommunicationareexplored.Thearticlefollowsaprocessofexaminingthe

    aestheticsofliteracy,theimplicationsofparticipatingincollaborativewritingspaces,andthe

    implicationsandconsiderationsofusingsuchspacesincludingstudentneedsandskills

    assessments.Thesestudentconsiderationslendthemselvestoanalysisoftoolaffordancesand

    supportrequirementstoincludealllearners.Thearticleislimitedtoasingleperspectiveofone

    contributor,butprovidesacreative,alternativeinsightintodigitaldesignoftext.

    Yancey,K.B.(2009).Writinginthe21stcentury.Retrievedfrom

    http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Press/Yancey_final.pdf

    AreportfromtheNationalCouncilofTeacherofEnglishintheUnitedStates.Itisacallto

    actiontohelpstudentscomposeoften,composewell,andthroughthesecomposingsbecome

    thecitizenwritersofourcountry,thecitizenswritersofourworld,andthewritersofourfuture

    (Yancey,2009,p.1).Thearticlediscussestheimportanceofexaminingpedagogyofteaching

  • thenewmodelsofwriting.Thereisalsoanawarenessofthechangingaudienceofwritingas

    optionsforsharingandcommunicatingwithanaudienceareenabledinawebbasedworld.The

    articledoesnotexaminethetechnologyasmuchasitexaminesthechangeinpedagogy

    requiredtoteachwritinginawithtools,mediums,audiencesandopportunitieschanging.The

    opportunitiestointeractmorewithtextthroughcommenting,manipulating,addingothermedia,

    andopenlysharingischanginghowwemustteachwritingandwhattoolsstudentsareprovided

    towritewith.WithanexaminationofthefutureofwritingYanceyalsolooksbacktohistorical

    perspectivesonwritingandwhereyourtoolsandprocesseshaveevolvedfrom.