Transcript
  • AnnotatedBibliography

    AlbertaEducation.(2013).Ministerialorderonstudentlearning.Retrievedfrom

    http://education.alberta.ca/media/6950988/mostudentlearning.pdf

    TheMinisterialOrderisthefundamentaldocumentfromAlbertaEducation(2013)

    implementingthevisionofInspiringEducation.Ifwearelookingattransformationaltoolsand

    processesandhowwecansupportthoseprocessesforalllearners,thisdocumentandthe

    competencieslistedwithin,provideavisionandguidanceforlearningandresearch.Oneofthe

    foundingprinciplesofthedocumentiseducationinAlbertais,basedonthevaluesof

    opportunity,fairness,citizenship,choice,diversityandexcellence.(AlbertaEducation,p.1)This

    speakstotheneedtoprovidetoolsandopportunitiesforalllearners.Furthertothisbasic

    principle,thefoundationsofemploy(ing)literacyandnumeracytocreatemeaning(p.2)and

    apply(ing)multipleliteracies:reading,writing,mathematics,technology,languages,mediaand

    personalfinance(p.3)speaktotheneedtofocusonliteracyandwriting,butalsoemployan

    expandedviewofliteracy.Theinclusionofmediaandtechnologyasliteraciesexpandourview

    ofwritingandthereforehowwecansupportchangingdigital,mediainfusedwritingthrough

    assistivetechnology.

    Archer,A.A.(2012).Writingasdesign:Enablingaccesstoacademicdiscourseinamultimodal

    environment.SouthAfricanJournalOfHigherEducation,26(3),411421.

    Thisarticleexamineshowtobroadenstudentaccesstoawiderrangeoftoolsand

    supporttowriteinamultimodalenvironment.Learningtowriteinpartmeanslearninghowto

    producewelldesignedprintanddigitaltexts,andlearninghowthedesignofthepagecontributes

    torhetoricalimport(p.412).Thevisualspatialelementsofwriting,emphasis,materiality,

    spellingandtypography,andhowtoteachstudentstoconsidertheseelementsneedtobe

  • consideredasweworkwithlearnerswithsupportneeds.Afterexaminingvisualtextelementsit

    thenmovesintographicandimageelementstocommunicateandtellstories.Thisarticletakes

    theperspectiveofconsidering,supportingandinstructingtheseelementsinHigherEducation,

    buttheprincipleseasilytransfertoaK12environment,andespeciallytothosewithprint

    difficulties.Ifweworkoncreatingmoreaccessibletextwithmorevisualelementsitcanbemore

    accessible.Thecreationofthisexpandedtextmediumisessentialtoconsider.

    Broun,L.(2009).Takethepenciloutoftheprocess.TEACHINGExceptionalChildren,42(1),

    1421.

    Anarticleexaminingthetraditionalneedtousethepencilandpaperastheprimary

    meansofcommunicatingwriting.Broun(2009)suggeststhepencilpresentsmultiplebarriers

    andoffersthekeyboardasaprimarywritingtool.Thephysicalprocessofwritingcanbesucha

    labourintensiveprocessthattheendproductdoesnotreflecttheacademicknowledgeor

    learningofthestudent.Brounviewsthelimitationsofthepencilasawritingtoolthroughthelens

    oflearnerswithAutismSpectrumDisorder(ASD)examiningthelimitationsinbraindevelopment

    thatmaybeaugmentedbyusingakeyboardtowrite,butrecognizingtherangewithinlearners

    withASD.Brounfurtherexploresstudentsthatarenonverbalandhowkeyboardslinkedwith

    speechcapabilitiescanfurtherenhancebothwritingandcommunicationskillsbyallowing

    studentstowriteandthenspeakthoughtsandcontributions.Thearticleprovidesarguments

    againstkeyboardsasaprimarywritingdeviceincludingcost,typinginstruction,equityandtime.

    Itisapassionateargument,supportedbycitedresearch,examiningourthinkingofwhattools

    andmediumsweareprovidingforlearnerswithadditionalsupportneedsandalllearners,as

    digitaltoolsareubiquitous.Thelimitationsareaviewofalearnerwithonespecificdisability,but

    theargumentcanbeappliedmoreglobally.

  • Cho,K.,&MacArthur,C.(2010).Studentrevisionwithpeerandexpertreviewing.Learningand

    Instruction,20(4),328338.

    Aresearchstudyexaminingtheeffectofdifferenttypesoffeedback,delivered

    electronically,onwriting.Twentyeightundergraduatelevelwritersreceivedfeedbackfromeither

    asingleexpert(SE),asinglepeer(SP),ormultiplepeers(MP).Howthestudentsreviseddrafts

    basedonthisfeedbackwasexamined.Itwasfoundthatstudentsmademorecontentbased

    revisionstotheirworkintheMPfeedbackgroupandthatmostoftheSEfeedbackresultedin

    lowleveleditingchanges,asopposedtocontentchanges.Itwasalsofoundacrossallgroups

    thatthemorecomplextherepairsmadetothewriting,thehigherqualitythewritingwasinthe

    end.Thestudyhaslimitationsofsamplesize,butthemethodasappliedtothisstudyandothers

    intheareaofwritingfeedbackappearstobethoughtfulandcomplete,measuringfeedback

    types,quality,andendproduct.Thelownumbersofparticipantlimitedtheamountofresultsthat

    werestatisticallysignificant.Whenexaminingwriting,feedbackisanessentialpartofthe

    process.Examininghowbesttoprovidethatfeedback,whetherbypeers,experts,multiple

    peersisvitaltoknowwhatkindsoftoolsandsupportswewillneedtoputintoplaceforour

    learners.

    Faux,F.(2005).Multimodality:Howstudentswithspecialeducationalneedscreatemultimedia

    stories.Education,Communication&Information,5(2),167181.

    Astudyanalysingtheproductionofmultimediatextsbythreestudentswithvarious

    needs,includinglowcognitivefunctionandlowselfesteem.Usingnewtoolsprovidedan

    increasedcognitiveload,buttheinterestinthetoolandsupportcapabilitiesofspellcheck,

    keyboarding,andvisualelementsbroughtmoremeaningandeasetothecompositionprocess.

  • Thepreandpostsamplesofwritingindicatedthatstudentswerechoosingtoemploythenew

    literaciesdevelopedthroughintroducingalternativewritingmethods.Faux(2005)foundthat,the

    abilitytocreateinteractiveenvironmentsnecessitatesaconsiderationofabstractconceptssuch

    astime,spaceandreaderintervention.Thisenhancementofskillsforlearnerswithadditional

    needssupportstheuseofmultimodaltextintheclassroomtoenhancelearning.Thestudyhas

    verylimitednumbers,butveryprecisedescriptionsofbenefitsandstrengthsaffordedbythe

    mediumtosupportneeds,giveshelpfulinsights.

    Klages,M.,&Clark,J.(2009).Newworldsoferrorsandexpectations:Basicwritersanddigital

    assumptions.JournalofBasicWriting(CUNY),28(1),3249.

    TwoProfessorsofEnglishataCommunityCollegeexaminewritingandtheuseof

    eportfoliosasawaytobridgethegapbetweentraditionalwritingandthewritingprocessandthe

    newdigitalageprocesslessworldofinstantpublishing.Tryingtobridgethegapbetween

    unstructuredwritingandmoreformaltraditionalwritingprocesses.Inordertobeeffectiveusers

    ofdigitalmedia,studentsmustknowhowtowriteforamultimodalenvironmenttheyareadriftin

    aworldofinstantpublishingwithouttheskillsofproficientwritersandthinkers(Klages&Clark,

    p.33).Thearticleprovidesremindersthateventhoughwritingtoolsandmediumsarechanging

    thereisstillaneedforprocessandsupportingalllearnersthroughthatchangingprocess.

    Instructionofwritingneedstoadapttochangingpublicationspeedandmethodsandweneedto

    examinehowlearnerswhorequirethemostsupportfitintothisnewworldofwritingandinstant

    publication.Thearticleisafantasticsetofprinciplestothinkthrough,withafocusonprocess

    elementsandhowtosupportthoseprocesselements.

    Jocius,R.(2013).Exploringadolescents'multimodalresponsestoTheKiteRunner:

  • Understandinghowstudentsusedigitalmediaforacademicpurposes.JournalOfMedia

    LiteracyEducation,5(1),310325.

    Anexaminationofamultimodalwritingprojectinahighschoolsetting.Theresearch

    studyexamineshowstudentschoose,useandapplytechnologytoshowtheirunderstandingof

    thenovelTheKiteRunner.Thearticlegoesintoextensivedetailaboutwhatmultimodalwritingis

    andhowitgoesbeyondthetraditionaldefinitionofwriting.Theprojectisdescribedindetail

    includingtheoptionsandchoicesgiventothestudents.Jocius(2013)thengoesontodraw

    comparisonsandhighlightstrengthsofindividualprojects,includingwherestudentsrequired

    additionalsupportwithinthemultimediatoolstocompletetheirwriting.Thearticleisstrongasit

    providesacasestudyanalysisofmultimodalwritingtogivedetailedinformationoftheprocess

    andsupportstudentsmayrequire.

    Shepard,A.T.(2014,January28).Studentgenerateddigitalmediatosupporttheliteracyskills

    ofhighschoolstudentswithautismspectrumdisorder.[Weblogpost].Retrievedfrom

    http://leadspartnership.ca/theconversation/studentgenerateddigitalmediasupportsliter

    acyautismspectrumdisorder/

    ApreliminaryresearchstudyfromShepard(2014)doingresearchforaPHDon

    supportingstudentswithASD.Studentsinjuniorandseniorhighcreatedvarioustypesofmedia

    basedtext.Shepardfoundthatstudentswerenotonlyindependentlycapableofcreating

    multimodalprojects,buttheycommunicatedmoreabouttheirlearningthanduringclass

    discussionorusingtraditionalwriting.Specificcasestudyexamplesofhowthemultimedia

    enhancedlearningopportunitiesandprovidealternativemethodsofcommunication.Supports

    andalternativetoolswhichsupportthewritingandcommunicationprocessarepresented.The

  • articleprovidesaninitialglimpseintoongoingresearchandisnotpeerreviewedyet,butasitis

    partofalargerdissertationitwillbeinthefuture.

    Vasudevan,L..(2010).Literaciesinaparticipatory,multimodalworld:Theartsandaestheticsof

    web2.0.LanguageArts,88(1),4350.

    Anarticlelookingathowdigitalmediacanbringbackart,creativity,andenhance

    imaginationinlearnersatalllevels.Vasudevan(2010)examinestheadditionofdigitaldesign

    elementstowritingasbringingmorecreativityandplayintothewritingprocess,makingitmore

    invitingandmoreaccessible.Theissuesofopenendedcreative,expressiveprojectsandwhere

    theyfitintomoretraditionalrigidclassroomandassessmentsystemsarediscussed.Shifting

    perspectivesofwritingandcreatingasplayandselfrepresentationinsteadofjustfor

    compositionandcommunicationareexplored.Thearticlefollowsaprocessofexaminingthe

    aestheticsofliteracy,theimplicationsofparticipatingincollaborativewritingspaces,andthe

    implicationsandconsiderationsofusingsuchspacesincludingstudentneedsandskills

    assessments.Thesestudentconsiderationslendthemselvestoanalysisoftoolaffordancesand

    supportrequirementstoincludealllearners.Thearticleislimitedtoasingleperspectiveofone

    contributor,butprovidesacreative,alternativeinsightintodigitaldesignoftext.

    Yancey,K.B.(2009).Writinginthe21stcentury.Retrievedfrom

    http://www.ncte.org/library/NCTEFiles/Press/Yancey_final.pdf

    AreportfromtheNationalCouncilofTeacherofEnglishintheUnitedStates.Itisacallto

    actiontohelpstudentscomposeoften,composewell,andthroughthesecomposingsbecome

    thecitizenwritersofourcountry,thecitizenswritersofourworld,andthewritersofourfuture

    (Yancey,2009,p.1).Thearticlediscussestheimportanceofexaminingpedagogyofteaching

  • thenewmodelsofwriting.Thereisalsoanawarenessofthechangingaudienceofwritingas

    optionsforsharingandcommunicatingwithanaudienceareenabledinawebbasedworld.The

    articledoesnotexaminethetechnologyasmuchasitexaminesthechangeinpedagogy

    requiredtoteachwritinginawithtools,mediums,audiencesandopportunitieschanging.The

    opportunitiestointeractmorewithtextthroughcommenting,manipulating,addingothermedia,

    andopenlysharingischanginghowwemustteachwritingandwhattoolsstudentsareprovided

    towritewith.WithanexaminationofthefutureofwritingYanceyalsolooksbacktohistorical

    perspectivesonwritingandwhereyourtoolsandprocesseshaveevolvedfrom.


Top Related