annotated swmp review checklist€¦ · web viewarchaeology consultant documents quality control...
TRANSCRIPT
Archaeology Consultant Documents
Quality Control (QC) Review Project Name:
Document Prepared By:Reviewer:
Review Completion Date:
Status Key“X” indicates an item is satisfactorily addressed.“ok” indicates the item is satisfactorily addressed, but see comments for notes.Check appropriate Document/Template type- put NA for other documents/templates not part of this review.Blank status and highlighting indicates item needs to be corrected or completed as indicated in the comments.
Element Status CommentsType of Document/Template Baseline Report*Technical Report*DOEs*Damage Assessment*Archy Permit*Context Statement*Treatment Plan*Recovery Plan*Monitoring Report
Identifying InformationLocation InformationTitle, HeadersFed Aid # & Key #Signature Boxes
Project Description
BackgroundEnvironmental DescriptionHistoric ContextSources Used
Methods
Findings
NRHP assessment
1
QC Signatures
Preparer: _______________________
Reviewer: _______________________
Archaeology Consultant Documents
Quality Control (QC) Review Recommendations
List of References
MapLocation Map
Photographs Correct labeling
Overall Typos
Reviewer EvaluationDo you agree with findings and recommendationsDocument adequacySuggestions
*Please refer to the SOW for all content and expectations for each document.
2