another example text 692019 and your message to 37607
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Another example
![Page 2: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What is the pH of 0.100 M citric acid?
![Page 3: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What are you thinking…?
A. I am thinking absolutely nothing.B. I am waiting for you to tell me what to think.C. I’m thinking it must be equilibrium because
that’s all we talk about.D. I’m thinking it must be equilibrium because it
is asking about the pH
![Page 4: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What is the pH of 0.100 M citric acid?
Citric acid is H3C6H5O7
Now, I’m thinking…A. Must be an acidB. Must be diproticC. Must be triproticD. Must be a strong acidE. Must be a weak acid
![Page 5: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What is the pH of 0.100 M citric acid?
Ka1=7.1x10-4
Ka2=1.7x10-5
Ka3=4.1x10-7
Now, I’m thinking:A. Must be a weak acidB. Must be a strong acidC. Must be a triprotic weak acidD. I don’t get paid to think, you do.
![Page 6: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What is the pH of 0.100 M citric acid?
Ka1=7.1x10-4
Ka2=1.7x10-5
Ka3=4.1x10-7
Now, I’m thinking:A. 3 partsB. 2 parts
D. I’ve had about enough of your nonsense.
![Page 7: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
What is the pH of 0.100 M citric acid?
Ka1=7.1x10-4
Ka2=1.7x10-5
Ka3=4.1x10-7
H3C6H5O7 (aq) + H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + H2C6H5O7- (aq)
H2C6H5O7- (aq) + H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + HC6H5O7
2- (aq)
HC6H5O72- (aq) + H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + C6H5O7
3- (aq)
Take them one at a time…or do I?
![Page 8: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
H3C6H5O7 (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + H2C6H5O7-
(aq)
I 0.100 M - 0 0
C -x -x +x +x
E 0.100 –x - X X
![Page 9: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Always try the assumption, we only have 30 seconds to lose.Assume x<<0.100
![Page 10: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Check close but no cigar
![Page 11: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
![Page 12: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
H3C6H5O7 (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + H2C6H5O7-
(aq)
I 0.100 M - 0 0
C - - + +
E 0.092 -
![Page 13: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Start where the first one leaves offH2C6H5O7
- (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) HC6H5O7 -2(aq)
I 0
C -x -x +x +x
E 0.00808-x 0.00808+x x
![Page 14: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Always try the assumption, we only have 30 seconds to lose.Assume x<<0.00808
![Page 15: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Check
YAY! It works.
![Page 16: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Start where the first one leaves offH2C6H5O7
- (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) HC6H5O7 -2(aq)
I 0
C -x
E 0.00806 0.00810
![Page 17: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Let’s take a moment for some deep reflection….
Did anything change during the second equilibrium?A. Yes, EVERYTHING changed.B. No, NOTHING changed.C. Some things changed, some things didn’tD. What are these “things” of which you speak?
![Page 18: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Nothing changed…
…to 2 sig figs.
Which is a good thing! If it had changed, I would upset the first equilibrium!
![Page 19: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
First equilibriumH3C6H5O7 (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + H2C6H5O7
- (aq)
I 0.100 M - 0 0
C - - + +
E 0.092 -
![Page 20: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Second equilibrium
They BOTH have to be satisfied if I’m truly at equilibrium.
Let’s pretend this second equilibrium turned out differently…
![Page 21: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Imaginary second equilibriumH2C6H5O7
- (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) HC6H5O7 -2(aq)
I 0
C -0.004 -x
E 0.00508 0.0121
Now, look back at the first equilibrium…two of these compounds are the same!
![Page 22: Another example Text 692019 and your message to 37607](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062620/551a81ba55034643688b5731/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Text 692019 and your message to 37607
Imaginary first equilibriumH3C6H5O7 (aq) +H2O (l) ↔ H3O+ (aq) + H2C6H5O7
- (aq)
I 0.100 M - 0 0
C - - + +
E 0.092 still same - Now 0.0121 Now 0.004
It can’t be at equilibrium anymore.
The assumption that I can treat the equilibria separately relies on them not undoing each other. The bigger the K difference, the better. Otherwise, you have to solve both K’s simultaneously rather than consecutively.