appendix iv.a.3 technical memo summarizing and analyzing ... · of the existing outdoor...

19
APPENDIX IV.A.3 Technical Memo Summarizing and Analyzing Illustrative Athletic Field Lighting Plan (January 2010)

Upload: others

Post on 01-Jun-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

APPENDIX IV.A.3Technical Memo Summarizing and Analyzing Illustrative Athletic Field

Lighting Plan (January 2010)

Technical Memo Summarizing and AnalyzingIllustrative Athletic Field Lighting Plan for theProposed Loyola Marymount University Master

Plan Project

Prepared by Musco Lighting, LLC

4 Jenner, Suite 100Irvine, California 92618

Prepared for Loyola Marymount University.

January 2010

i

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Page

1.0 Purpose of memo..........................................................................................................................................1

2.0 Introduction to Light....................................................................................................................................1

3.0 Existing Conditions......................................................................................................................................2

4.0 illustrative Light Plan ..................................................................................................................................24.1 Leavey Field....................................................................................................................................34.2 Hannon Field..................................................................................................................................34.3 Sullivan Soccer Field......................................................................................................................44.4 Page Baseball Stadium...................................................................................................................44.5 Smith Softball Field........................................................................................................................44.6 University Pool...............................................................................................................................5

5.0 Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines......................................................................................55.1 South of W. 78th Street....................................................................................................................55.2 South of W. 80th Street....................................................................................................................65.3 East of Campus (West of McConnell Avenue)...........................................................................65.4 Summary of Light Spillover .........................................................................................................6

6.0 Skyglow .........................................................................................................................................................7

7.0 Recommendations........................................................................................................................................7

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1 Leavey Field Light Plan...............................................................................................................................82 Hannon Field Light Plan .............................................................................................................................93 Sullivan Soccer Field Light Plan...............................................................................................................104 Page Baseball Stadium Light Plan............................................................................................................115 Smith Softball Field Light Plan.................................................................................................................126 University Pool Light Plan........................................................................................................................137 Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines South of W. 78th Street ............................................148 Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines South of W. 80th Street ............................................159 Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines East of Campus (West of McConnell

Avenue)........................................................................................................................................................16

Illustrative Athletic Field Lighting Plan

1

1.0 PURPOSE OF MEMO

The purpose of this memo is to describe and analyze a potential light plan for athletic fields at Loyola

Marymount University, which was prepared by Musco Lighting, LLC, to provide nighttime illumination

of the existing outdoor recreational facilities on the Loyola Marymount University Campus (Campus).

Musco Lighting specializes in the design and manufacture of systems for lighting recreation and athletic

fields throughout the U.S. and worldwide.

This memo includes (1) a technical introduction to light, (2) a description of the existing outdoor

recreational facilities on the Campus, (3) a description of the illustrative light plan by facility, (4) an

analysis of light spillover and skyglow as a result of the illustrative light plan, and (5) recommended

mitigation to reduce light spillover.

The illustrative lighting plan evaluated in this memo is conceptual only and may be subject to change at

the time of installation at athletic facilities on the LMU Campus. Future light spillover levels at off-site

locations were predicted using computer models, not actual field measurements. Accordingly, the

modeling of future off-site light levels associated with this lighting plan assumes the absence of any

screening of off-site light spillover (that is, no existing or future walls or vegetation in proximity to

facilities to be lighted), in order to evaluate the greatest potential for impacts. As discussed above, this

conservative approach results in some light spillage in a few discrete locations on the boundary of

Campus. However, if conditions remain as they are today, existing vegetation on the perimeter of

Campus in proximity to facilities that are proposed to be lighted, as well as the 130-foot-wide by 37-foot-

tall left field scoreboard and nearby wall that stand between the edge of the field and the adjacent

residential properties on McConnell Avenue, would greatly reduce off-site light spillover in this area.

Additional vegetation planted in the future, and the continued presence of the scoreboard and nearby

wall, also would reduce spillover. Further, as discussed in Section 7.0, Recommendations, of this report,

various additional measures, including adjusting light locations and visors and construction of additional

screens or vegetative buffers can reduce light spillover to minimal levels at off-site locations.

2.0 INTRODUCTION TO LIGHT

"Light" refers to light emissions, or the degree of brightness, generated by a given source. Artificial

lighting may be generated from point sources (i.e., focused points of origin representing unshielded light

sources) or from indirectly illuminated sources of reflected light. Light may be directed downward to

illuminate an area or surface, cast upward into the sky by an unshielded fixture and refracted (dispersed)

by atmospheric conditions (skyglow), or cast sideways and outwards onto off-site properties (spillover).

Skyglow and light spillover are considered forms of light pollution.

2

Nighttime illumination may also cause nighttime glare, which refers to direct, intense, focused light, as

well as reflected light, and hampers visibility. Glare caused by direct sources of light generally originates

from mobile and therefore transitory sources, such as automobiles, but may also originate from

particularly intense stationary sources, such as floodlights.

3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS

The majority of LMU’s athletic fields and facilities are concentrated in the southernmost portion of LMU’s

Campus. Facilities include Sullivan Soccer Field, Page Baseball Stadium, Smith Softball Field, Higgins

Golf Center (which consists of a putting green, two bunkers, and a driving cage), the LMU Tennis Center,

and the University Pool at Burns Recreation and Aquatic Center. Hannon Field, which is at the southern

end of the portion of Campus historically referred to as the Burns Campus, and Leavey Field, which is

located atop Drollinger Parking Plaza in the area historically referred to as the Leavey Campus, are used

for intramural recreational activities. With the exception of the Tennis Center and University Pool,

outdoor Campus athletic facilities are currently not lighted after dark; no high-mast flood lighting (i.e.,

multiple light fixtures mounted atop poles of approximately 50 feet or more in height or more) or other

sources of substantial outdoor, nighttime lighting are present at these facilities. Nighttime light levels on

the Campus are comparable to those within the surrounding residential neighborhoods.

4.0 ILLUSTRATIVE LIGHT PLAN

The illustrative light plan has been designed to achieve a specific level of lighting uniformity for each

facility that is adequate for both recreational and competitive use. The illustrative light plan for each

facility is described below. The proposed number of poles, pole and mounting height ranges, and number

of luminaires are described for each facility. The model assumes “Green Generation” luminaire types,

with a rated lamp life of 5,000 hours and an average of 134,000 lumens per lamp (light output of the lamp

itself). The range of illumination levels provided on the facility is described in horizontal foot-candles at a

level of 3 feet above grade.

As discussed more fully below, for a number of reasons, various fields require different levels of

illumination, depending on the type of use. The illustrative lighting designs range from approximately 30

foot-candles of illumination on Hannon Field to approximately 100 foot-candles on the field of Page

Baseball Stadium. For safety reasons, more light is required to light sports such as baseball, softball, and

lacrosse, since they employ smaller, faster moving objects. Thus, for safety reasons, more light is

recommended on fields for these sports. Additionally, due to the level of competition, more light is

recommended for practice and play of intercollegiate sports than is recommended for intramural or club

sports.

3

The illustrative lighting designs also include poles of varying heights. Taller poles help control light

spillover because the taller poles allow lights to be focused more precisely on the playing area. Thus, the

taller the poles, the smaller the light spillage. Additionally, different visors can be installed on the light

fixtures to control spillover and skyglow. These visors generally range in length from 5 and 7 inches to 14

inches, with longer visors providing better control. The longer 7 and 14 inch visors, however, cannot be

used for baseball and softball fields because these longer visors limit the up lighting for the field such that

players cannot adequately track or see fly balls.

4.1 Leavey Field

Leavey Field is located on the roof deck of Drollinger Parking Plaza. Drollinger is located along a sloping

portion of LMU Drive adjacent to Burns Campus. Drollinger’s roof deck, and therefore Leavey Field, sits

at the same elevation as the campus and off-site 78th Street neighborhood to the south of the parking

structure, but the parking structure rises to a maximum height of approximately 30 feet above adjacent

grade along its northwest elevation, fronting on LMU Drive. As shown in Figure 1, 9 poles would be

installed at grade surrounding Drollinger Parking Plaza in order to illuminate Leavey Field. The poles

would range in height from 70 feet above grade along the south edge of Leavey Field to 110 feet above

grade along its northwest edge, and accordingly would range from 70 to 80 feet above the surface of the

playing field surface. The three tallest poles, with heights of 100 and 110 feet above grade, would be

located along the northwest elevation of Drollinger Parking Plaza and would illuminate the northwest

edge of Leavey Field. The remaining six poles would be located along the southern elevation (four poles)

and eastern elevation (two poles) of Drollinger; the poles along the east elevation would be several

hundred feet north of the Campus’s southern property line. A total of 71 luminaires would be installed

on the 9 poles.

Light levels on Leavey Field would range from 31 to 60 foot-candles when all 71 luminaires are operating.

Although the spillover analysis below conservatively assumes all 71 luminaires are lit, the light levels

could be adjusted to lower levels (i.e., 39 luminaires) under the illustrative lighting plan, depending on

the type of sport and level of play the field is being used for.

4.2 Hannon Field

As shown in Figure 2, four poles would be installed on Hannon Field, including two on the eastern

perimeter of the field close to Loyola Boulevard, and two on the western perimeter of the field. Each

would extend 70 feet above the surface of the field. A total of 26 luminaires would be installed on these

four poles. The luminaires would be mounted at the top of the poles.

4

Light levels on Hannon Field would range from 18 to 43 foot-candles when all 26 luminaires are

operating.

4.3 Sullivan Soccer Field

As shown in Figure 3, eight poles would be installed on Sullivan Field: four along the eastern edge of the

field adjacent to Page Baseball Stadium and four along the western edge near Loyola Boulevard. They

would range in height from 80 to 90 feet extending above the surface of the field. A total of 82 luminaires

would be installed on these eight poles. The luminaires would be mounted at the top of the poles.

Light levels on Sullivan Field would range from 63 to 88 foot-candles when all 82 luminaires are

operating.

4.4 Page Baseball Stadium

As shown in Figure 4, eight poles would be installed in Page Stadium around the perimeter of the field.

Two poles in the northwestern corner of the field would illuminate home plate, the pitcher’s mound, and

a portion of the infield; an additional two poles would illuminate the infield (center, left and right fields);

and four poles on the eastern and southern perimeter would illuminate the outfield. Each pole would

extend 90 feet above the surface of the field. A total of 125 luminaires would be installed on these eight

poles. The luminaires would be mounted at heights ranging from 70 to 90 feet above the surface of the

field. The three poles closest to home plate would utilize back-to-back mounting configurations to also

provide light to the warm-up area and bull-pens located north and west of the home plate and the

surrounding bleachers.

Light levels on Page Stadium would range from 89 to 116 foot-candles in the infield and 52 to 99 foot-

candles in the outfield when 120 of the 125 luminaires are operating (the remaining 5 luminaires would

not contribute to the lighting of Page Stadium, but would instead provide lighting solely to the warm-up

area described above).

4.5 Smith Softball Field

As shown in Figure 5, six poles would be installed on Smith Field. Two poles along the western perimeter

of the field would illuminate home plate, left field, and the bleachers; two poles along the southern

perimeter would illuminate right field and the outfield; and two poles along the eastern perimeter would

illuminate the outfield. They would range in height from 70 to 75 feet above the surface of the field. A

total of 38 luminaires would be installed on these 6 poles. The luminaires would be mounted at heights

5

ranging from 70 to 75 feet above the surface of the field. These poles would also provide lighting to the

two bull-pens located immediately west and north of Smith Field.

Light levels on Smith Field would range from 65 to 89 foot-candles in the infield and 42 to 72 foot-candles

in the outfield when 34 of the 38 luminaires are operating (the remaining 4 luminaires would not

contribute to the lighting of Smith Field, but would instead provide lighting to Higgins Golf Center.

4.6 University Pool

As shown in Figure 6 , four poles would be installed on the University Pool deck in the northeast,

southeast, northwest, and southwest corners of the pool deck. Each pole would extend to a height of

90 feet above the deck surface. A total of 50 luminaires would be installed on these four poles. The

luminaires would be mounted at the top of the poles.

Light levels on the pool itself would range from 115 to 137 foot-candles when all 50 luminaires are

operating. Light levels on the pool deck would range from 43 to 124 foot-candles when all 50 luminaires

are operating.

5.0 LIGHT SPILLOVER ONTO RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES

Models were prepared by Musco Lighting to evaluate light spillover levels at the nearest residential

properties and the findings of those models is presented below. Residential properties along W. 78th

Street, W. 80th Street and McConnell Avenue would be subject to light spillover from lighting installed in

existing athletic fields. As previously stated, since models were used to predict future off-site light

spillover levels, model results assume the absence of any intervening screening devices such as

vegetation or a wall, including existing vegetation and the existing, to-remain 130-foot-wide by 37-foot-

tall left field scoreboard and nearby wall, and are therefore conservative estimates of off-site light

spillover.

Recommendations to reduce off-site spillover levels are presented in Section 7.0, Recommendations, of

this report.

5.1 South of W. 78th Street

As shown in Figure 7, lighting installed in Leavey Field would generate a maximum spillover of

0.50 foot-candles (horizontal) at the property lines of residential properties south of the Campus along W.

78th Street.

6

5.2 South of W. 80th Street

As shown in Figure 8 , lighting installed at the facilities located in the southeastern corner of Campus,

primarily Sullivan Soccer Field and Page Baseball Stadium, would generate a maximum light spillover of

2.01 foot-candles (horizontal) at the residential property lines along W. 80th Street.

5.3 East of Campus (West of McConnell Avenue)

As shown in Figure 9, lighting installed in the southeastern corner of Campus, primarily at Page Baseball

Stadium, Smith Softball Field, and Higgins Golf Center, would generate light spillover at levels ranging

from 0.75 to 10.42 foot-candles at adjacent residential property lines along McConnell Avenue. Light

spillover is greatest (i.e., in excess of 3 foot-candles) on the properties immediately east of Page Baseball

Stadium. Spillover levels are below 2 foot-candles at the remaining property lines along McConnell

Avenue.

5.4 Summary of Light Spillover

Table 1 identifies the maximum light levels that would be generated at the property lines of the

residences along these roadways without any intervening screening devices as a result of the illustrative

light plan.

Table 1Light Spillover Summary

Location of Residences Nearest Light Generator(s)Maximum Spillover Level

(foot-candles)South of W. 78th Street Leavey Field 0.50

South of W. 80th Street Sullivan Soccer Field; Page BaseballStadium

2.01

Adjacent to Eastern Campus Edge (Westof McConnell Avenue)

Page Baseball Stadium; SmithSoftball Field; Higgins Golf Center;Tennis Center

10.42

Source: Musco Lighting, 2009.Note: Light levels presented above are measured at residential property lines at 3 feet above grade (horizontal). Light levels assume no vegetativeor other type of screening, including existing vegetation. Actual light levels at off-site locations would be lower because of the presence of existingor future vegetation or other buffer.

7

6.0 SKYGLOW

The introduction of lighting to these outdoor recreational facilities could contribute to skyglow if light is

cast upward into the sky by an unshielded fixture and refracted by atmospheric conditions. All light

fixtures would be directed downward to illuminate the intended surface. Furthermore, all luminaires

under the illustrative light plan are equipped with visors. As discussed above, visors reduce skyglow,

with larger visors being more effective. However, smaller 5-inch visors are required for sports such as

baseball and softball where, for competitive as well as safety reasons, it is critical that players be able to

see and track fly balls.

7.0 RECOMMENDATIONS

To reduce light spillover onto neighboring residential property as a result of the illustrative light plan, the

lighting contractor would adjust lighting fixtures and visors upon installation to account for conditions in

the neighborhood and reduce off-site lighting spillover impacts as much as possible.

Additionally, to reduce skyglow, the lighting contractor would again adjust lighting fixtures and visors

upon installation to account for conditions in the neighborhood and the fixtures would use the largest

visors appropriate for the activities on the field.

Finally, vegetation and other screening or filtering devices should be maintained or supplemented at the

edges of lit fields or at the Campus perimeter such that light spillover would not exceed 2 foot-candles

(horizontal) on adjacent residential properties.

31444039424649444948433333454731

52605450545956555659575151545033

556054515453545055595857565239

4854525048454749545652524637

47565248434144505555514535

505851464344485256575235

4855504645495357585646

46535047475157605445

485553525254585846

5358565652525441

49595857544943

465757585544

4954565545

38464538

L5

L6

L8

L9

L1L2

L3

L7

L4

150'

37'

329'

37'

'292

237'

18'

158'

15'

20'

'52

422'

389'

139'

'22

298'

'571

353'

SCALE IN FEET 1 : 60

0' 60' 120'

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

1 L1 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 5 5 02 L2-L3 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 8 8 01 L4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 02 L5-L6 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 9 9 01 L7 100' -30' 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 02 L8-L9 110' -30' 80' 1500W MZ 9 9 09 TOTALS 71 71 0

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYLeavey FieldLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CALeavey Field High· Size: 485' x 423'· Grid Spacing = 30.0' x 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 146

Average: 50.1Maximum: 60Minimum: 31Avg/Min: 1.61Max/Min: 1.94

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.66CV: 0.13

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000Number of Luminaires: 71Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 111.04Max KW: 120.7

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (09:36)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558L

Leavey Field Light Plan

FIGURE 1

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

60 30 0 60

n

24

27

28

28

31

29

27

25

23

23

26

29

30

29

33

36

33

28

19

25

36

40

42

40

40

39

34

31

28

27

29

33

36

35

35

37

35

29

19

25

36

43

42

43

42

39

35

31

28

28

30

33

34

34

33

32

32

27

18

22

32

38

39

40

40

36

33

30

28

29

31

33

33

31

31

31

31

26

18

24

33

37

38

38

38

35

31

29

28

29

31

34

34

31

30

32

31

26

18

26

35

38

40

38

38

37

32

28

28

30

32

36

37

33

34

37

34

27

19

24

37

43

41

39

39

38

33

29

29

30

34

38

38

37

39

42

38

30

18

27

38

42

37

35

34

35

30

28

28

29

32

36

34

33

37

38

34

25

21

30

28

24

20

25

24

22

20

21

22

23

24

24

18

22

24

21

H1

H2 H3

H4

98'

13'

318'

1'

318'

180'

98'

180'

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 H1-H2 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 6 6 02 H3-H4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 04 TOTALS 26 26 0

Print Date (25/Feb/2009) & Time (15:36)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 25-Feb-09File #: 132558H

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYHannon FieldLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CAHannon Field· Size: 183' x 390'· Grid Spacing = 20.0' x 20.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 176

Average: 31.3Maximum: 43Minimum: 18Avg/Min: 1.74Max/Min: 2.40

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.81CV: 0.20

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000Number of Luminaires: 26Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 40.66Max KW: 44.2

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

Hannon Field Light Plan

FIGURE 2

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

50 25 0 50

n

S1

S3

S4 S5

S6

S8

7180696363646870

7588827776767673

7486807675788075

7583787272768176

7585807270748077

7085827369738073

7085827369738073

7585807270748077

7583787272768176

7486807675788075

7588827776767673

7180696363646870

S2 S7

172'

'012

172'

'07

172'

'012

142'

'012

142'

'07

142'

'012

172'

'07

142'

'07

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 S1, S4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 10 10 02 S2-S3 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 11 11 04 S5-S8 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 10 10 08 TOTALS 82 82 0

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (08:23)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558A

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYSullivan FieldLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CASullivan Field· Size: 360' x 225'· Grid Spacing = 30.0' x 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 96

Average: 75.5Maximum: 88Minimum: 63Avg/Min: 1.20Max/Min: 1.41

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.21CV: 0.08

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.000Number of Luminaires: 82Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 128.25Max KW: 139.4

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

Sullivan Soccer Field Light Plan

FIGURE 3

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

80 40 0 80

n

C1

C2

A1

A2

B1

B2

105 113 100 95 89 84 81 73 70 64 58

113 116 113 107 100 96 92 89 86 82 75 56

101 112 114 111 105 98 90 85 87 86 82 61

97 107 111 110 103 94 86 82 83 83 80 62

92 101 107 104 97 88 82 80 80 80 76 61

88 99 99 94 87 82 80 80 79 77 72 58

85 94 90 84 80 79 79 79 78 75 71 56

81 89 85 81 78 77 78 78 76 75 72 55

76 87 85 80 78 77 77 77 75 73 71 58

64 80 85 81 79 77 76 76 74 72 68 52

56 73 80 78 75 72 72 73 72 68 67

53 59 60 60 58 57 56 58 52

D2

D1

338'60'

60'

'833

50'

58'

58'

50'

190'

40'50'

190'

197'

'143

341'

'791

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (08:56)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558A

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYPage StadiumLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CAPage Stadium· Size: Irregular· Grid Spacing = 30.0' x 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Infield OutfieldNo. of Target Points: 25 114

Average: 104.8 76.1Maximum: 116 99Minimum: 89 52Avg/Min: 1.18 1.46Max/Min: 1.30 1.90

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.13 1.39CV: 0.07 0.15

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 0.995Number of Luminaires: 120Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 187.68Max KW: 204.0

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 A1-A2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 12/2* 14 01 B1 90' - 70'

90'1500W MZ1500W MZ

220

220

00

1 B2 90' - 70'90'

1500W MZ1500W MZ

220/5*

220

05

4 C1-C2D1-D2

90' - 90' 1500W MZ 12 12 0

8 TOTALS 125 120 5* This structure utilizes a back-to-back mounting configuration

Page Baseball Stadium Light Plan

FIGURE 4

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

80 40 0 80

n

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (09:02)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558A

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYSmith FieldLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CASmith Field· Size: Irregular· Grid Spacing = 20.0' x 20.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Infield OutfieldNo. of Target Points: 25 78

Average: 76.9 55.0Maximum: 89 72Minimum: 65 42Avg/Min: 1.18 1.30Max/Min: 1.36 1.70

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.23 1.27CV: 0.09 0.12

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 0.986Number of Luminaires: 34Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 53.18Max KW: 57.8

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

1 A3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 A4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 B3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 7 7 01 B4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 02 C3-C4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 8 6 26 TOTALS 38 34 4

C4

70

77

78

75

68

61

56

57

57

53

75

88

89

81

73

69

62

60

59

55

45

72

88

87

79

72

67

62

58

57

55

45

70

84

83

79

72

65

59

57

56

53

45

65

79

78

73

68

62

57

55

53

52

43

59

71

72

67

62

56

53

54

53

48

54

63

63

60

57

53

52

52

50

42

54

61

59

57

55

54

52

50

48

55

60

59

58

54

54

50

48

43

50

54

57

55

54

49

44

43

46

47

45

C3

73'

199'

197'

72'

35'

48'33

'

33'

114'

48'

40'

114'

A3

B3

A4B4

Smith Softball Field Light Plan

FIGURE 5

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

50 25 0 50

n

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (09:12)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558A

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYPoolLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CAPool - High· Size: 171' x 81'· Grid Spacing = 20.0' x 20.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 45

Average: 126.4Maximum: 137Minimum: 115Avg/Min: 1.10Max/Min: 1.20

UG (Adjacent Pts): 1.13CV: 0.05

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 0.996Number of Luminaires: 50Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 78.2Max KW: 85.0

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

116

126

126

125

120

127

134

136

134

128

124

131

136

132

122

120

127

130

127

117

122

126

126

125

118

121

129

131

128

118

118

133

137

132

117

122

136

137

135

121

119

129

128

127

115

P1

P2

P3

P4

44'

5'

105'

205'

140'

0'

24'

205'

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 P1-P2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 14 14 02 P3-P4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 11 11 04 TOTALS 50 50 0

University Pool Light Plan

FIGURE 6

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

40 20 0 40

n

Print Date (23/Mar/2009) & Time (16:29)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 23-Mar-09File #: 132558LR

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

ILLUMINATION SUMMARY78th St Spill-HighLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CA78th St Spill-High· Grid Spacing = 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 13

Average: 0.294Maximum: 0.50Minimum: 0.04

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 1.00017:serianimuL fo rebmuN

Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 111.04Max KW: 120.7

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

1 L1 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 5 5 02 L2-L3 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 8 8 01 L4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 02 L5-L6 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 9 9 01 L7 100' -30' 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 02 L8-L9 110' -30' 80' 1500W MZ 9 9 09 TOTALS 71 71 0

L2L3

L4

0.430.490.480.500.440.430.380.23

0.160.10

0.080.06

0.04

Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines of W. 78th Street

FIGURE 7

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

60 30 0 60

n

S1

S3 S6

S8

S2 S7

C1

C2

B2

D2

D1

0.470.600.811.051.291.591.801.881.851.791.661.431.150.890.710.570.510.550.751.071.661.831.861.992.011.640.890.510.21

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 A1-A2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 12/2* 14 01 A3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 A4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 B1 90' - 70'

90'1500W MZ1500W MZ

220

220

00

1 B2 90' - 70'90'

1500W MZ1500W MZ

220/5*

225

00

1 B3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 7 7 01 B4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 04 C1-C2

D1-D290' - 90' 1500W MZ 12 12 0

2 C3-C4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 8 8 02 P1-P2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 14 14 02 P3-P4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 11 11 02 S1, S4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 10 10 02 S2-S3 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 11 11 04 S5-S8 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 10 10 0

26 TOTALS 295 295 0* This structure utilizes a back-to-back mounting configuration

Print Date (23/Mar/2009) & Time (16:22)

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 23-Mar-09File #: 132558AR

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

ILLUMINATION SUMMARY80th St. SpillLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CA80th St. Spill· Grid Spacing = 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 29

Average: 1.207Maximum: 2.01Minimum: 0.21

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 0.995592:serianimuL fo rebmuN

Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 461.38Max KW: 501.5

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines of W. 80th Street

FIGURE 8

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

80 40 0 80

n

Print Date (27/Feb/2009) & Time (09:29)

ILLUMINATION SUMMARYEast SpillLoyola Marymount UniversityLos Angeles, CAEast Spill· Grid Spacing = 30.0'· Values given at 3.0' above grade

· Luminaire Type: Green Generation· Rated Lamp Life: 5,000 hours· Avg Lumens/Lamp: 134,000

CONSTANT ILLUMINATIONHORIZONTAL FOOTCANDLES

Entire GridNo. of Target Points: 36

Average: 3.043Maximum: 10.42Minimum: 0.08

Average Lamp Tilt Factor: 0.995592:serianimuL fo rebmuN

Avg KW over 5,000 hours: 461.38Max KW: 501.5

Guaranteed Performance: The CONSTANTILLUMINATION described above is guaranteed for the ratedlife of the lamp.

Field Measurements: Averages shall be +/-10% inaccordance with IESNA RP-6-01 and CIBSE LG4. Individualmeasurements may vary from computer predictions.

Electrical System Requirements: Refer to AmperageDraw Chart and/or the "Musco Control System Summary"for electrical sizing.

Installation Requirements: Results assume +/- 3%nominal voltage at line side of the ballast and structureslocated within 3 feet (1m) of design locations.

Not to be reproduced in whole or part without the writtenconsent of Musco Lighting. ©1981, 2009 Musco Lighting

By: Shawn MoyerDate: 27-Feb-09File #: 132558A

Pole location(s) dimensions are relativeto 0,0 reference point(s)

P1

EQUIPMENT LIST FOR AREAS SHOWNPole Luminaires

QTY LOCATION SIZE GRADEELEVATION

MOUNTINGHEIGHT

LAMPTYPE

QTY /POLE

THISGRID

OTHERGRIDS

2 A1-A2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 12/2* 14 01 A3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 A4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 4 4 01 B1 90' - 70'

90'1500W MZ1500W MZ

220

220

00

1 B2 90' - 70'90'

1500W MZ1500W MZ

220/5*

225

00

1 B3 70' 5' 75' 1500W MZ 7 7 01 B4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 7 7 04 C1-C2

D1-D290' - 90' 1500W MZ 12 12 0

2 C3-C4 70' - 70' 1500W MZ 8 8 02 P1-P2 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 14 14 02 P3-P4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 11 11 02 S1, S4 90' - 90' 1500W MZ 10 10 02 S2-S3 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 11 11 04 S5-S8 80' - 80' 1500W MZ 10 10 0

26 TOTALS 295 295 0* This structure utilizes a back-to-back mounting configuration

S1

S3

S4 S5

S6

S8

S2 S7

C1

C2

A1

A2

B1

B2

D2

D1

1.10

1.93

3.08

4.54

6.19

7.01

7.21

8.47

10.42

9.93

7.75

6.81

6.65

5.03

3.21

2.04

1.31

1.17

1.17

1.26

1.62

2.03

2.21

2.08

1.67

1.14

0.73

0.47

0.33

0.25

0.20

0.16

0.13

0.11

0.09

0.08

A3

A4

B3

B4

C4

C3

P2

P4

P1

P3

Light Spillover onto Residential Property Lines East of Campus (West of McConnell Avenue)

FIGURE 9

877-002•05/09

SOURCE: Musco Lighting, LLC - February 2009

APPROXIMATE SCALE IN FEET

150 75 0 150

n