applying blended learning – pat hammett

6
1 Applying Blended Learning – Pat Hammett Courses: 1. IOE/MFG 461 – Quality Engineering/Statistical Analysis Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus) 2. MFG 599 – Design for Six Sigma (Product Development) Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus) 3. Industry Short Course – Six Sigma Green Belt One Time Offering – 40 Industry Managers/Engineers

Upload: isabella-jensen

Post on 31-Dec-2015

22 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

DESCRIPTION

Applying Blended Learning – Pat Hammett. Courses: IOE/MFG 461 – Quality Engineering/Statistical Analysis Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus) MFG 599 – Design for Six Sigma (Product Development) Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

11

Applying Blended Learning – Pat Hammett

Courses:

1. IOE/MFG 461 – Quality Engineering/Statistical Analysis Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus)

2. MFG 599 – Design for Six Sigma (Product Development) Fall Term (Enrollment: ~100 On Campus; 60 Off Campus)

3. Industry Short Course – Six Sigma Green Belt One Time Offering – 40 Industry Managers/Engineers

Page 2: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

1. IOE 461: Quality Engineering

Began On/Off Campus Course Mix - 2003

Early Challenges High demand: shift in class sizes from 30 120+

Course Content: need to provide significant practice (statistical tools) and support without face-face

Course Software: provide software training (Minitab) Student Background Diversity: accommodate mix of

Engr Undergrad students with Industry Grad Students

Significant Learning Style Differences due to size/diversity

2

Page 3: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

IOE/MFG 461 – Blended Learning Solutions

Use of a few Online Prerequisite Modules WHY ONLINE??

Not all students need/want this information Make available prior to start of class

Weekly Tape Problem Solving Session (Software Use) WHY ONLINE??

Mix of students familiar with Minitab Software Much more flexible than typical office hours (wider audience) Instructor (vs. Teaching Assistant) Led Effective for different learning styles

Estimate 50-70% students view these and find helpful

3

Page 4: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

2. MFG 599 – Blended Learning Solutions

Numerous Prerequisite Modules (full course available) WHY ONLINE??

Flexible, Diverse Backgrounds (different universities) Do not take up class time for those with pre-req knowledge

Discussion Posts as part of Grade (discussion course) On Campus: 2 Posts (1-2 paragraphs); Off Campus: 4 WHY ONLINE??

allows off campus students to get involved Bring in personal experiences about the class topics

allows students with language challenges to participate allows more time for deeper, more thoughtful comments

4

Page 5: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

3. Industry Short Course – Blended Learning Solutions

Client was concerned about a full online training program and their employees ability to keep up

Created a 5-Day Blended Course Day 1 – Classroom

More effective to get organized, initial use of software Day 2-4 (15 lectures w/ exercises) – Online

Allowed ~6 weeks to complete (most did in last 2 weeks) Day 5 – Classroom

More difficult material involving deeper discussion Provide opportunity for face-face questions for online

material Course received high marks (~ evaluations 4.8/5.0)

However, no follow-up course yet5

Page 6: Applying Blended Learning –  Pat Hammett

Self Assessment

University Courses: Course Demand Remains High Overall Scores Similar

Still, median Off Campus is usually 1-2% lower than On Campus

Per University Evaluations (Q1/Q2) – now similar for on and off campus (Fall 2010: ~4.7 – 4.8 for both)

Key gap closer: Instructor-answered off campus email Main Off Campus Concern (Company Evaluations):

heavy workload/difficulty versus learning style

6