8/8/2019 ARMANİE IMPASSE – 2 AND THE MİSTAKES OF TURKEY

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/armanie-impasse-2-and-the-mistakes-of-turkey 1/2

23.10.2010

ARMANE IMPASSE 2 AND THE MSTAKES OF TURKEY

Firstly, I want to mention the language and expression of the author. The language and

expression of this are more clear than the other column I wrote last week with the heading Armenia

Impasse. It is a good thing that the author told the events in detail and by giving information.Especially the quotations which were done by Semih Ediz from the author and the phrases in

equation marks are really great! The column is like the article because of them, according to me.

Lastly, it is a good behave to mention from another columnist, Sami Kohen, rival newspaperman

Secondly, I want to ask some questions: What did Turkey talk to Armenia, Sweden, Russia

Federation, the USA and other states about this topic before the protocol was signed and during the

protocol? What did Turkey want from Armenia and other states and promise to Armenia and the

others? What did Armenia want from Turkey and other states and promise to Turkey and others? All

the states regarding to the protocol are behaving normally and arent accepting the responsibility for

the protocol as if nothing happened. But Sweden mediated between Turkey and Armenia about this

protocol. The USA and Russia Federation forced Turkey to be made an agreement between Turkeyand Armenia and to be opened the borders among Armenia and Turkey. But, now these states are

behaving differently as if these states forgot. The states which said that Armenian Genocide will be

searched by an international commission and the borders between Turkey and Armenia will never

change are accepting normal thing the decision of Armenia Intuitional Court. And today the states

that have ambassadors and consulates in Armenia and Azerbaijan are accepting normal thing again

the military occupation. And lastly, the states left alone Turkey about this topic if they didnt want to

do these from Turkey.

This situation is showing how well Turkey knows diplomacy (!), according to me. If Turkey talked

to Armenia and other states about the borders among Turkey and Armenia, the research commission

for Armenian Genocide, the military occupation of Azerbaijan was done by Armenia- and othertopics in detail. And unless the protocol includes these topics, here Turkey has some mistakes.

According to this situation, unfortunately, the Minister of Foreign Affairs of Russia Federation is right:

Turkey is making up some things which arent real or dont exist on the protocol. OK, how right is

Philip Gordon about this topic?

The reason of turning this protocol and relationship between two these states into an impossible

situation is that the matters of the protocol or what something was talked arent known by anyone

(its true for me at least!). OK, how will this issue? According to me, solving this issue is that the

relationship between Turkey and Armenia last in the past as if anything didnt happen or works

regarding to the protocol will be continued by Turkey, Armenia and other actors. If we choose the

second alternative, it is required that diplomacy should be applied by Turkey correctly and Turkey

should be used their own cards carefully. The most way, according to me, to solve issue, is to go to

the beginning of the issue. I remember aphorism, if you cant solve an issue, you should go to the

beginning of the road. For example, someone may tell the matters of the protocol to the

communities in the world secretly and public opinion might be trusted. While this is done, Turkey can

make interviews with other states to be rescued this impasse from the very beginning. Turkey should

try to solve the issue like the borders, the genocide and the military occupation of Azerbaijan by

making bilateral interviews.

8/8/2019 ARMANİE IMPASSE – 2 AND THE MİSTAKES OF TURKEY

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/armanie-impasse-2-and-the-mistakes-of-turkey 2/2

In conclusion, it is controversial weather the decision of Armenia Institutional Court is right or

not. In additional to this decision, the other states arent supporting Turkey and however, they say to

Turkey to approve the protocol! It shows that Turkey made some mistakes somewhere. After this,

one from two things will be. The states especially Turkey and Armenia- will try to continue the

protocol and conclude it or Sami Kohen will be right. And this situation will transform into a state like

win-win!. But nobody will win anything or everybody will lose a lot of things and the issue will

increase much more. Here I want to criticize myself because of not knowing things about the

protocol or topic enough.

ERAY ARIK

2008636009

DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS