asbd overview
DESCRIPTION
ASBD logo. ASBD Overview. change this horizontal line to seismic waveform, use light grey color. Axial System of Bending-type Damper Invention by K. J. Chuang U. S. (2004) & Japan ( 200x ) Patent Tested at National Earthquake Engineering Research Center ( 200x ). Insert year of patent. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
ASBD Overview
Axial System of Bending-type Damper
Invention by K. J. Chuang
U. S. (2004) & Japan (200x) Patent
Tested at National Earthquake Engineering Research Center (200x)
2
Superior seismic isolation & protection
Affordable cost
Straightforward design analysis
Easy installation and maintenance
Can retrofit existing structure
ASBD Advantages
3
Independent componentsVertical bearings support structural weightHorizontal dampers dissipate seismic
energy
ASBD Fundamentals
4
Orthogonal seismic energy paths vastly simplify design and analysis work
ASBD Fundamentals
5
Steel plate provides high load-bearing capacity
Vertical Bearing
Teflon coating facilitates low friction & high wear
6
Friction coefficient data
Vertical Bearing
Wear characteristics data
7
Horizontal Damper
Long axial displacementHigh energy dissipationConsistent damping
coefficientExcellent durability
8
Force-displacement consistency
Large displacement durability test 75 ton, 100 cycles
Damping coefficient
Horizontal Damper
9
Affordable components cost due to simplicity of concept and design
Lower original structure cost due to reduced reinforcement requirements against earthquakes
Cost
10
Simple to install due to separate vertical and horizontal components
Can easily retrofit existing structures
Installation
11
Endurance test, three-story RC structure at NCREE
Laboratory Test
12
Test data, actual seismic input - El Centro (1940)
Laboratory Test
•Ground acceleration •Top floor acceleration
只要一個圖就夠了,這其中以 El Centro 對研究地震的人來說最著名.如果日本客戶,用 Kobe 也行,要依學術研究習慣註明年份 (1995) .
地表加速度,原圖中的藍線 頂樓加速度,原圖中的紅線
13
Fatigue test at NCREE withstood cumulated energy dissipation equivalent to 15 repetition of Ji-ji earthquake (1999, Richter scale magnitude 7.3)
Laboratory Test
14
Text
Technology Comparison
15
Text
Technology Comparison
16
Technology Comparison
Conventional Structure ASBD
Earthquake Survivability Richter 6.5 Richter 7 to 8
Acceleration at Rooftop (under 7.3 earthquake)
Amplified 3 times
1.4 g
Reduced 80%
< 0.1 g
Rebar Usage 150 kg/m2 110 kg/m2
17
Competition Comparison
LRB (Lead Rubber Bearing)
ASBD
Design Principles
Complex Simple
Capacity 0.2 m 0.8 m
Endurance 4 cycles > 100 cycles
Installation Complex Simple
18
Design Principles
Competition Comparison
LRB ASBDCoupled vertical and horizontal components, prone to generating bending moment, increasing design complexity.
Separate vertical and horizontal components, simplifying design work, easy to handle.
19
Large Displacement Handling Capacity
Competition Comparison
LRB ASBDEffective damping ratio tops off at 25% when displacement reaching 0.2 m.
Displacement 0.3-0.8 m can be designed upon request. Test data shows 0.4 m example.
20
Damper Endurance
Competition Comparison
LRB ASBDClosed space inhibits heat dissipation. Damper stability deteriorates after 4 cycles.
Open design aids heat dissipation. Damper behavior unchanged after 100 cycles.
21
Components Installation
Competition Comparison
LRB ASBD•Tedious preparation work
•Takes 4-5 weeks
•Difficult to replace
•Straightforward installation
•Less than 1 week
•Easy to replace
22
Award Winning
Gold Medal 2009Chinese Society of Structural Engineering
23
Breakthrough concept and design principle
Components exhibits excellent capacity, endurance, and consistency
Can withstand earthquake magnitude 7 to 8
Simple installation
Affordable cost
Conclusion
24
Conclusion
We stop no earthquakes We stop the damages
Core value ASBD !