asean: in a daze over the haze?

6
24/05/2015 8:37 pm The Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze? Page 1 of 6 http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/ Home About SLR Board of Advisors Our Sponsors Editorial Board Past Editorial Boards Recruitment FAQ Journal Submissions House Style Juris Illuminae Contributing to Juris Style Guide Lecture Writing Competition Contact Us Search... Home » Articles , Juris Illuminae ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze? 25 December 2013 Posted by: Singapore Law Review 2 Comments by Ryan Nicholas Hong The countries of Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand experienced one of the worst transboundary haze pollution crisis in June 2013, with the Pollutant Standards Index in Singapore reaching a record of 401, and Malaysia declaring a state of emergency in some areas. This annual “haze season” has indeed plagued the region for decades, prompting calls for regional unity in the face of this perennial problem. The protracted nature of the issue can be attributed to it being multifaceted; involving many different stakeholders who have conflicting interests and influence. This essay will thus examine the complex interplay of regional and local forces, with a special emphasis on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the way forward in forging a stronger regional architecture. The Blame Game Ensues: J’accuse! The haze crisis resulted in severe losses to the economies of the aforementioned Southeast Asian countries, with tourism and productivity suffering the most. Its aftermath also saw the usual finger pointing, with many of them pointing at the Indonesian government. Much ink has been spilled over the lack of political will on the part of the Indonesian government. After all, domestic laws have existed for some time: any individual found guilty of starting a forest fire can face a jail term of up to 10 years, and fines of up to 10 billion rupiah. Firms found guilty of the offence can also have their profits seized, operations shut down, and be sued for damages. [1] Yet, enforcement of laws remains difficult. According to a Riau Provincial Police spokesman, most fires are started at night in remote locations, making it difficult for the culprits to be tracked down.[2] Rampant

Upload: reuben-henry-hart

Post on 06-Feb-2016

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

The Singapore Law Review

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 1 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

HomeAbout SLR

Board of AdvisorsOur SponsorsEditorial Board

Past Editorial BoardsRecruitment FAQ

JournalSubmissions

House StyleJuris Illuminae

Contributing to JurisStyle Guide

LectureWriting CompetitionContact Us

Search...

Home » Articles, Juris Illuminae

ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?25 December 2013 Posted by: Singapore Law Review 2 Comments

by Ryan Nicholas Hong

The countries of Singapore, Malaysia and Thailand experienced one of the worst transboundary haze pollutioncrisis in June 2013, with the Pollutant Standards Index in Singapore reaching a record of 401, and Malaysiadeclaring a state of emergency in some areas. This annual “haze season” has indeed plagued the region fordecades, prompting calls for regional unity in the face of this perennial problem. The protracted nature of theissue can be attributed to it being multifaceted; involving many different stakeholders who have conflictinginterests and influence. This essay will thus examine the complex interplay of regional and local forces, with aspecial emphasis on the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN), and the way forward in forging astronger regional architecture.

The Blame Game Ensues: J’accuse!

The haze crisis resulted in severe losses to the economies of the aforementioned Southeast Asian countries,with tourism and productivity suffering the most. Its aftermath also saw the usual finger pointing, with many ofthem pointing at the Indonesian government. Much ink has been spilled over the lack of political will on thepart of the Indonesian government. After all, domestic laws have existed for some time: any individual foundguilty of starting a forest fire can face a jail term of up to 10 years, and fines of up to 10 billion rupiah. Firmsfound guilty of the offence can also have their profits seized, operations shut down, and be sued for damages.[1] Yet, enforcement of laws remains difficult. According to a Riau Provincial Police spokesman, most fires arestarted at night in remote locations, making it difficult for the culprits to be tracked down.[2] Rampant

Page 2: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 2 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

corruption also remains a big issue in Indonesia, with “rent-seeking local leaders and corporations takingadvantage of lax law enforcement and murky regulations to continue clearing forests at an increasingly rapidrate”.[3]

However, what stoked tempers more was Indonesia’s response and reactions to the crisis. Many felt that theresponse by the Indonesian government was far too slow, and the magnitude of the response, too small. Cloud-seeding operations (with two aircraft) only commenced when the haze reached critical levels in the countries ofSingapore and Malaysia, and only three helicopters were used to put out the fires on hundreds of hectares ofpeatland.

Even more troubling was the reactions of some in the Indonesian government. While the government purportedto shift some of the blame on Malaysian and Singapore-based palm oil companies, the minister coordinatingJakarta’s response to the crisis, Agung Laksono, accused Singapore of acting “like children” in a tizzy.Indonesian Foreign Minister Marty Natalegawa also remarked that Indonesia would not apologise for the haze.

It should however, be heartening to note that the Indonesian Government has taken, and continues to takeaction. In October 2013, the Riau police charged 29 people, including plantation owners and field workers, fortheir alleged role in starting forest fires. One company that was thought to be a possible culprit behind the fireis PT Adei Plantation and Industry. According to a Wall Street Journal Report, investigations are currentlyongoing, with senior employees of Adei Plantation, including one Danesuwaran K. Singham, and one Tan KeiYoong currently assisting with the investigations.[4]

Ultimately, it still remains to be seen if the government will impose harsh penalties on any persons convicted,to ensure deterrence. The government must also resolve to stamp out corruption if it wants to ensurecompliance with and enforcement of the law. Yet, this may be a simplification of a complex issue. Burning ofpeatland remains the cheapest and fastest way to clear large swathes of land, and farmers are used to thissystem. Unless a viable alternative is proposed, the problem is likely to remain persistent.

Other Actors

Given the difficulties faced by the Indonesian government, what then can other countries and the internationalcommunity do?

Firstly, governments could ban the import of products by companies responsible for the fires. However, this isnot an easy solution given the difficulties in identifying the culprits behind the fires, especially sinceinvestigations are still ongoing (as aforementioned), months after the crisis. Further, such actions may wellaffect bilateral ties and trade relations between countries.

A second alternative is a boycott by an active citizenry of the same products. However, this is not a viablesolution given that not all consumers make environmentally-conscious choices when it comes to theirshopping. There is also no guarantee that such a boycott would be effective, if it is even initiated in the firstplace, given that there would always be a segment of the population that would be apathetic to such a cause(think pragmatic Singaporeans). Palm oil, from the plantations in Indonesia, is also seemingly ubiquitous, andcan be found in many products that we use daily, such as toothpaste, shaving cream, soaps, and it is even usedas an ingredient in foods. The geopolitical realities of Southeast Asia must also be considered. Can a boycott inour tiny red dot affect the large and powerful behemoth that is Indonesia?

A third recourse is to be found in International Law. As Professors Tommy Koh and Michael Ewing-Chownote, international law allows for extraterritorial jurisdiction if the actions affect the state asserting such ajurisdiction. With such laws, governments can prosecute the culprits for activities carried outside their territory.[5] Yet, once again, this proves tricky if the culprits cannot be identified in the first place.

Lastly, cooperation is required from industry and corporations. A good example is Sime Darby, which gave theIndonesian government permission to re-take its fire prone lands to prevent wildfires, and also gave an

Page 3: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 3 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

assurance that it would educate farmers on their land about the dangers of open burning[6]. More work has tobe done towards making sustainable farming the new norm. This will eradicate slash-and-burn techniques.

The Asean Way

Given the challenges faced by the Indonesian government and a lack of viable options through internationallaw, perhaps we can look to ASEAN for a solution. The ASEAN summit in Brunei saw the adoption of thejoint haze monitoring system, marking a small, but important milestone in anti-haze efforts. The system willemploy high-resolution satellite images together with land use and concession maps to identify the culpritsbehind future forest fires. This unprecedented move, garnering the backing of all 10 ASEAN leaders,underscores the cooperation and resolve by the regional group in tackling this problem. Singapore’s PrimeMinister Lee Hsien Loong also welcomed the move as a “concrete example of cooperation”[7]. However,problems remain. While Singapore had pushed for official land use and concession maps that show wherecompanies are allowed to conduct their economic activities, to be made publicly available, Indonesia andMalaysia registered their disapproval, citing legal concerns.

Although ASEAN has long been noted for the so-called “Asean Way”, which prioritises consensus overconflict, perhaps ASEAN is not quite the paper tiger it is so often made out to be. As much as ASEAN ispowerless as long as Indonesia does not ratify the 2002 Asean Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution(and indeed, powerless even if Indonesia does ratify the agreement[8]), it should be noted that the fiveenvironment ministers of Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Brunei, and Thailand did reach a compromise thatthe maps be shared on a case-by-case basis between governments. Indonesia’s Presidential advisor on climatechange Agus Purnomo has also come out in support of the release of maps that show the burnt areas.

In the aftermath of the crisis, leaders from the affected countries, including Singapore’s Environment MinisterVivian Balakrishnan made numerous trips to Indonesia, placing pressure on the Indonesian government. It issubmitted that ASEAN is highly relevant as a forum for small countries like Singapore, especially in light ofthe geopolitical realities of Southeast Asia, where Indonesia has the largest economy. As Singapore’s LawMinister K Shanmugam noted, “ASEAN and international organisations prove useful and important platformsfor issues to be raised and countries have to then account for their actions. That by itself has had, in the past,impact on the conduct of countries”[9].

Conclusion

It has now been about half a year since the region’s worst air pollution crisis in 16 years. The embers are longgone, and the smog has subsided. But let us not forget that the problem remains perennial (and an annualissue), and addressing it would require the concerted efforts of industry, government, and citizenry.

Southeast Asian regionalism may well be a driving force for change and it shall be interesting to observe theevolving role that ASEAN will play in the near future, especially with the ASEAN Economic Community duein 2015. By then, Indonesia ought to have ratified the Asean Agreement on Transboundary Haze Pollution ifthe undertaking by its Environment Minister is followed through. Indonesia constitutes about 40 per cent of theASEAN economy[10] and it shall have to demonstrate more resolve and sincerity in dealing with the hazeproblem if it wants to assume a leadership role in Southeast Asia.

Singapore’s national broadsheet pessimistically noted that we, like others in the region, ought to learn to bebetter prepared when the haze inevitably returns again.[11] Hopefully, there can be a day when that statementshall no longer hold water.

[1] “Two Malaysian plantation managers in haze probe, banned from leaving Indonesia” online: MSNMalaysia <http://news.malaysia.msn.com/malaysia-news/two-malaysian-plantation-managers-in-haze-probe-banned-from-leaving-indonesia-1>

Page 4: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 4 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

[2] Arlina Arshad, “Indonesia begins cloud-seeding to fight haze” online: Yahoo News<http://sg.news.yahoo.com/indonesia-begins-cloud-seeding-fight-haze-051337093.html>

[3] Sara Schonhardt, “How corruption is fuelling the haze”, The Straits Times (25 June 2013) online: TheStraits Times <http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/asia-report/opinion/story/how-corruption-fuelling-the-haze-20130625>

[4] Supra note 1

[5] Tommy Koh and Michael Ewing-Chow, “The transboundary haze and the international law”, The JakartaPost, (27 June 2013) online: http://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/ips/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2013/07/pa_TK_Jakarta-Post_The-transboundary-haze-and-the-international-law_270613.pdf>

[6] Supra note 1.

[7] S Ramesh, “PM Lee welcomes adoption of ASEAN haze monitoring system”, online: Channel News Asia<http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/asiapacific/pm-lee-welcomes-adoption/841538.html>

[8] See Koh Kheng Lian, “A Breakthrough in Solving the Indonesian Haze”, online: http://data.iucn.org/dbtw-wpd/html/EPLP-072/section12.html

[9]Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Press Release, “Transcript Of Minister For Foreign Affairs And Minister ForLaw K Shanmugam’s Press Conference On The Haze Issue” ( 22 June 2013) online:<http://www.mfa.gov.sg/content/mfa/media_centre/press_room/pr/2013/201306/mfa-press-release–transcript-of-minister-for-foreign-affairs-an.html>

[10]“Indonesia will be strong in ASEAN Economic Community 2015”, The Jakarta Post (08 September 2013)online: Asia News Network <http://news.asiaone.com/news/asia/indonesia-will-be-strong-asean-economic-community-2015>

[11] Joyce Lim, “For Riau’s farmers, livelihood trumps haze”, The Straits Times (30 June 2013) online: TheStraits Times <http://www.straitstimes.com/the-big-story/asia-report/indonesia/story/riaus-farmers-livelihood-trumps-haze-20130630>

2 Comments »

immigration services Orlando said:

It’s really a nice and helpful piece of information. I’mglad that you simply shared this useful information with us.Please stay us informed like this. Thank you forsharing.

# 3 May 2015 at 3:43 pmProperty Management Company Coral Springs said:

I simply couldn’t go away your web site prior to suggesting that I really enjoyed the standardinformation an individual provide for your guests?

Is gonna be back regularly to check out new posts

# 3 May 2015 at 4:41 pm

Leave your response!

Page 5: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 5 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments viaRSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

Name

Mail (will not be published)

Website (optional)

You can use these tags:<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite><code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.

Submit Comment

© 2014 The Singapore Law Review

The Singapore Law Review is run by students from the Faculty of Law, National University of Singapore. Wepublish the eponymous academic journal and a newsletter (Juris Illuminae). We also organize the annual SLRLecture, which is the longest running legal lecture series in Singapore. We aim to provide a platform foranyone who is interested in discussing legal issues.

Page 6: ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

24/05/2015 8:37 pmThe Singapore Law Review » Blog Archive » ASEAN: In a Daze Over the Haze?

Page 6 of 6http://www.singaporelawreview.org/2013/12/asean-in-a-daze-over-the-haze/

Singapore Law Watch

Currency Act - Currency (Denominations and Characteristics of Coins) Notification 2015 (S 302 of2015)Winsta Group sues 13 directors, officers over 'breach of duties'Woman awarded just $18k in $6.5m suit over knee injuryXpress and its former chairman broke listing rules in 2014: SGXAML/CFT obligations of corporate service providers under ACRA’s enhanced regulatory framework

Most Commented

Interview with Criminal Lawyer, Mr. Subhas AnandanNUH Liable for Causing Kidney Donor’s DeathThe Streetdirectory.com SagaRomeo Knew Juliet Was a Minor But…A Father's Sins

Meta

Log inEntries RSSComments RSSWordPress.org

Powered by WordPress | Log in | Entries (RSS) | Comments (RSS) | Arthemia theme by Michael Hutagalungmodified by Alamode