asian highway network in indonesia

13
1 ASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN INDONESIA The 4 The 4 th th Meeting of th Working Group on Meeting of th Working Group on the Asian Highway Priority Routes the Asian Highway Priority Routes Bangkok, Thailand 27-28 September 2011

Upload: others

Post on 21-Jan-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Microsoft PowerPoint - Asian HW-Indonesia.pptxASIAN HIGHWAY NETWORK IN INDONESIA
The 4The 4thth Meeting of th Working Group onMeeting of th Working Group on the Asian Highway Priority Routesthe Asian Highway Priority Routes
Bangkok, Thailand 27-28 September 2011
2
Denpasar – Surabaya – Surakarta –Semarang – Cikampek – Jakarta –Merak. Ferry : Ketapang-Gilimanuk
AH-2 :
Banda Aceh – Medan – Dumai –Pekanbaru – Jambi – Palembang –Bakauheni. Ferry : Bakauheni – Merak.
AH-25 :
Non Toll Road 1,128 km. Toll Road 409 km. Ferry 8 km.
Non Toll Road 2,586 km Toll Road - km. Ferry 26 km.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Banda Aceh
Government Policy on Development & Maintenance of AH Routes
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Banda Aceh
Sibolga
Padang
Batam
Bengkulu
Pangkalpinang
AH - 25
AH - 2
Strategy • The optimization of existing road network and its operation • Widening the links to reach the minimum standard • Quality improvement of the links to desirable service level • The priority will be according to the following order : crossing
border, provision of proper road signs and road marking, technical standard adjustment, road safety and the development of missing links.
Mid-Term National Development Plan •Capacity Expansion of Eastern Trunk Road of Sumatera (where the majority of AH-25 laid on) with minimum width 7 m. •Capacity Expansion of North Coast Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on from Jakarta to Semarang) with minimum width 14 m. •Capacity Expansion of Middle Trunk Road of Java (where AH-2 laid on from Surakarta to Surabaya) and continue to Banyuwangi via North Coast Trunk Road with minimum width 7m. •Capacity Expansion of Southern Trunk Road of Bali (where AH-2 laid on from Gilimanuk to Denpasar) with minimum width 6 m.
#
Current Status of AH Network Condition on June 2011
• In General, Road Condition of AH Route are relatively good. More than 93 % are in stable condition which mean there shouldn’t be any obstacle using the road anytime, any weather. The driver may run up to 60 km/hr in flat terrain on uncongested traffic.
• The Fewer bad condition laid on north Sumatera and Pemalang- Tegal, while the other poor laid on Jambi, Southern Sumatera and Cirebon-Brebes.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
AH - 25
AH - 2
0.001 - 4
4.001 - 8
8.001 - 12
12.001 - 100
Good
Fair
Poor
Bad
Good Fair Bad AH2 882.68        618.80        36.01          AH25 968.91        1,445.70    171.74        Grand Total 1,851.58    2,064.50    207.75       
Good Fair Bad AH2 57% 40% 2% AH25 37% 56% 7% Grand Total 45% 50% 5%
Condition (Km) AHRoute
#
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
Current Status of AH Network Width of Carriage Way on June 2011
• The most advanced route by the capacity point of view, is AH Route No.2 that laid from Merak to Semarang which almost all the road already meet 14 m.
• The Java Island itself, all the road already has minimum width 7 m.
• In order to meet government policy where the eastern trunk road of Sumatera should have minimum width 7 m, there are still several homework which scattered along the route, but the most are Riau and Lampung.
Notes : AH-2 ~ same alignment as AH-2 in Asean Highway . AH-25 ~ same alignment as AH-25 in Asean Highway.
Legend
0.1 - 4.499
4.5 - 5.499
5.5 - 5.999
6 - 6.999
7 - 13.999
14 - 100
< 4.5 m
*) the data is only covered non-toll road
< 4.5 m 4.5  6 m 6  7 m 7  14 m >= 14 m AH2                       10.57                59.07                600.83              867.01              AH25 1.50                                         862.84              1,593.44           128.57              Grand Total 1.50                   10.57                921.92              2,194.27           995.58             
< 4.5 m 4.5  6 m 6  7 m 7  14 m >= 14 m AH2 0% 1% 4% 39% 56% AH25 0.1% 0% 33% 62% 5% Grand Total 0% 0% 22% 53% 24%
Carriageway Width (Km)
Carriageway Width (%)
AHRoute
AHRoute
Current Status of AH Network Classification and Design Standards as June 2011
Major On-Going Projects 2011
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.1 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA LHOKSEUMAWE - PANTON LABU/SIMPANG (KM 328) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA LANGSA - BTS. PROV. SUMUT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 45000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 26 - Link No. : 021 - Link Name : PEMATANG REBA - SIBERIDA - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 27450000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 4021109 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3958500
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 27 - Link No. : 028 - Link Name : BTS. PROV. RIAU - MERLUNG - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 200000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 34 - Link No. : 015 - Link Name : SIMPANG INDRALAYA - MERANJAT - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 7890000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 36 - Link No. : 013.1 - Link Name : BUJUNG TENUK - TERBANGGI BESAR - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 56573430 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
- AH Code : AH-2 - AH No. : 29 - Link No. : 013 - Link Name : BTS. KOTA CIREBON - LOSARI (BTS. PROV. JATENG) - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 51569964 - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0
Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) AH2 10                               95,243,674                 49                              212,578,499               45                              127,167,805               AH25 284                             1,209,975,462           22                              77,980,418                 96                              124,717,035               Grand Total 295                             1,305,219,136           71                              290,558,917              140                            251,884,840             
Capacity Expansion AHCode
Bandar Lampung
Tanjung Pinang
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 5 - Link No. : 005.2 - Link Name : PANTON LABU - SP PEUREULAK - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 25000000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 7 - Link No. : 006 - Link Name : LANGSA - BTS.SUMUT - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 0 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 51188000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 30 - Link No. : 002.2 - Link Name : BTS. KODYA (MANDALA) - MUARA BULIAN - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 8901912 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 22500000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 30000000
- AH Code : AH-25 - AH No. : 21 - Link No. : 006.2 - Link Name : KANDIS - DURI - Rehabillitation Cost (mil Rp) : 3000000 - Betterment Cost (mil Rp) : 9750000 - Capacity Expansion Cost (mil Rp) : 31075000
Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) Vol (Km) Cost (mil. Rp) AH2 57                               258,723,145               145                            535,996,196               69                              109,375,315               AH25 163                             683,989,972               70                              250,089,300               85                              170,388,912               Grand Total 220                             942,713,117              215                            786,085,496              154                            279,764,227             
AHCode Capacity Expansion Betterment/Reconstruction Rehabillitation/Periodic Maint.
g <= 6 Bil Rp
6 - 20 Bil Rp
20 - 45 Bil Rp
45 - 90 Bil Rp
Programme of Road Signs Installation
4.25 BILLION RUPIAH2010 -20112. AH-25 (450 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND 550 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)
2.5 BILLION RUPIAH2008 - 20091. AH-2 (250 UNIT DIRECTIONAL SIGNS AND 300 UNIT SINGLE SIGNS)
6.75 BILLION RUPIAHTOTAL COST
COST ESTIMATION TIME PLANNED
ROUTE NUMBERING
IN INDONESIA
National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 – 2035
AHCode RSA Blackspot Total AH2 9 13 22 AH25 2 14 16
In the road design projects, Directorate General of Highway (DGH) has been considering safety, such as on EINRIP projects and SRIP projects as part of National Road Safety Master Plan (NRSMP) 2011 – 2035.
Following the step above, DGH has been carrying out Road Safety Audit (RSA) including in detailed design stage, road work, and pre-opening stage.Road safety audit identified a range of issues that will potentially affect the safety of users of the road when the works are completed.
DGH has the Strategic Plan to reduce the number of hazardous locations in Indonesia. Directorate General of Highways (DGH) have done Crash Reduction Investigation and prepared the countermeasures to address road safety issues at the East Corridor in Sumatra (Bakauheni to Banda Aceh via Palembang) and the North Coast Road in Java (Cilegon to Banyuwangi via Jakarta and Surabaya). Respectively these corridors are 1800 Km and 1200 Km long. DGH had collect crash data from Indonesian National Traffic Police before doing the investigation.
Monitoring Road Safety Audit And Blackspot Investigation Report
Concluding Remarks
• Asian Highway in Indonesia at this time continues to progress and is expected to reach the target at the end of 2014, where the AH-25 will have a standard class II and AH-2 of the Merak- Cikampek already be Primary class, Cikampek-Semarang as Class I and Semarang-Surabaya-Banywangi as Class II and Gilimanuk Denpasar as Class III.
• Various development cooperation and the improvement of road infrastructure needs to be done to accelerate the achievement of standards
• Asian highway network availability is less meaningful without being followed by various facilities in co-operation of traffic and inter-modal transportation.
13