assessment of climate change impact on eastern washington agriculture claudio o. stöckle biological...
Post on 21-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
Assessment of Climate Change Impact on Eastern Washington
Agriculture
Claudio O. StöckleBiological Systems
Engineering,Washington State University
USA
Objective
Assess the potential impact of climate change and elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration on selected crops in eastern Washington, region that produces most of the state’s agricultural output value.
Correlation between COCorrelation between CO22 Concentrations and Temperature Concentrations and Temperature The current concentration is the highest in 800,000 years, as determined by ice core dataThe current concentration is the highest in 800,000 years, as determined by ice core data
a The 800,000-year records of atmospheric carbon dioxide (red; parts per million, p.p.m.) and methane (green; parts per billion, p.p.b.) from the EPICA Dome C ice core together with a temperature reconstruction (relative to the average of the past millennium) based on the deuterium–hydrogen ratio of the ice, reinforce the tight coupling between greenhouse-gas concentrations and climate observed in previous, shorter records. The 100,000-year ‘sawtooth’ variability undergoes a change about 450,000 years ago, with the amplitude of variation, especially in the carbon dioxide and temperature records, greater since that point than it was before. Concentrations of greenhouse gases in the modern atmosphere are highly anomalous with respect to natural greenhouse-gas variations (present-day concentrations are around 380 p.p.m. for carbon dioxide and 1,800 p.p.b. for methane).b The carbon dioxide and methane trends from the past 2,000 years. Ed Brook, Nature 453, 291 (2008).
General Circulation Models Four GCMs were selected for this study:
PCM1, CCSM3, ECHAM5, and CGCM3.
PCM1 projects less warming and CCSM3 more warming for eastern WA. The other two GCMs are intermediate.
The GCMs project an increase in precipitation (3 to 9% by 2020 and 2080, respectively) with some differences in distribution, and with a larger relative increase in the winter.
Sunnyside Annual2020 2040 2080
CCSM3 1.9 2.8 3.6PCM1 1.3 2.2 3.0
Sunnyside Seasonal2020 2040 2080
CCSM3 1.8 2.9 3.8PCM1 1.3 1.9 2.8
Annual Temperature Difference with Baseline (oC)
Pullman
Probability of equal or higher temperature
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tm
ax (
o C)
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45CCSM3 CGCM3 ECHAM5 PCM1 Historical
Probability Distribution of Tmax (June/July)
Probability Distribution of Tmin (April)
Sunnyside
Probability of equal or lesser temperature
0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0
Tm
in (
oC
)
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
CCSM3 CGCM3 ECHAM5 PCM1 Historical
Atmospheric CO2 concentration(mol mol-1)
Rel
ativ
e c
ha
ng
e
Atmospheric CO2 concentration(mol mol-1)
Rel
ativ
e c
ha
ng
e
Relative change of Radiation-use efficiency for wheat and maize simulated with the CTP model (Stockle and Kemanian, 2009)
Assessment Approach Relied on crop simulation modeling with
interpretation based on literature and expert opinions.
CropSyst, a cropping systems model developed at WSU was used for the assessment.
Insect and disease models were used to complement the evaluation.
CropSyst has been tested and applied in all continents and under a wide range of climatic
conditions
ClimGenClimGen
The WSU weather generator ClimGen was used to generate daily series of projected weather.CropSyst has been used for climate
change assessment in studies elsewhere.
Assessment Approach Focus on the major agricultural
commodities in terms of economic value: apples, potatoes, and wheat.
Wheat is the dominant dryland crop.
Potato is the main irrigated annual crop.
Apple is the main irrigated tree fruit crop.
Assessment Approach Daily weather data for the years 1975-2005
were used to establish a baseline for change.
Projections of daily precipitation and temperature from the four GCMs were used to define three climate change scenarios:
2020 (2010 – 2039)2040 (2030 – 2059)2080 (2070 – 2099)
Assessment Approach The following locations (crops) were
included in the analysis:
o Pullman (winter and spring wheat, high precipitation)
o Saint John (winter and spring wheat, intermediate precipitation)
o Lind (winter wheat, low precipitation)o Othello (potatoes, irrigated)o Sunnyside (apples, irrigated)
Assessment Approach Computer simulations of crop growth and
yield assumed adequate supply of water and nutrients and good control of pests and diseases.
The only variables were climate change and CO2 elevation.
The impact of possible irrigation water shortages was assessed in a complementary effort (hydrology sector).
Assessment Approach The A1B IPCC emission scenario was used
to project atmospheric CO2 concentration.
Crop biomass productivity (a parameter that affects several simulated processes including crop water use) was assumed to increase 20% with a CO2 change from 370 to 600 PPM (FACE experiments).
Conclusions It is projected that the impact of climate
change alone on selected but economically important crops in eastern WA would be generally mild in the short term (i.e., next couple of decades), but increasingly detrimental with time (potential yield losses reaching 25% for some crops by the end of the century).
Conclusions However, the projected CO2 increase is
expected to provide significant mitigation to the effect of warming.
In fact, if the projected beneficial effect of CO2 elevation are fully realized, some crops may obtain important yield gains.
Adaptation based on changes in management (e.g., planting dates) or on new research (e.g., better adapted varieties) can provide additional mitigation or further enhance CO2 effects.
Conclusions Caveats to consider:
o Possible changes in the frequency and persistence of extreme temperature effects are not well represented in current climate projections
o We have assumed good control of pests and diseases, but these could affect crops in ways not described here
o Availability of irrigation water may become a significant limiting factor in some areas.
Conclusions Caveats to consider:
o Focus of the study is on yields, but quality can be affected even when yields increase.
o The economic cost of adaptation (e.g., management for increased pest control or greater nitrogen fertilization requirements) should be accounted for in future studies.