atass budget proposal
DESCRIPTION
ATASS Budget Proposal. Update on Fiscal Year 2004 & Fiscal Year 2005 Request. Understanding the Context for the ATASS Budget. Where are we? How did we get here? Where do we need to go?. Where Are We? Current Systems Supported by ATASS. Course Applicability System - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
ATASS Budget Proposal
Update on Fiscal Year 2004 & Fiscal Year 2005 Request
Understanding the Context for the ATASS Budget
Where are we?
How did we get here?
Where do we need to go?
Where Are We? Current Systems Supported by ATASS
Course Applicability SystemOn-line Course Equivalency GuidesArizona Course Equivalency Tracking SystemArizona Curriculum Routing and Evaluation SystemArizona Statewide System for Information on Student TransferATASS Web site
Where are we?
PoliciesCurriculumTechnical Support Systems
PoliciesAPASC participated in a retreat in November 2002As a result of the retreat, APASC set goals in the following areas: Evaluation of the transfer model Intent for strategic planning for technology systems Statewide staffing and support Strategic planning for ATASS budget
APASC has since identified a budget subcommittee and a technology planning committee who will work jointly to plan for the systems
Policies
APASC approved the GEATF recommendation to expand the AGEC policy so that individual community colleges can evaluate other regionally accredited higher education institution’s general education courses for inclusion in the AGEC
Curriculum
APASC approved the curriculum framework for the new Associate of Arts in Elementary Education (AAEE) degreeAPASC has charged the AAEE workgroup to develop advising models for the new degreeAPASC has supported improvements to individual pathways based on ATF recommendationsAPASC has charged a group to begin the evaluation of the curricular components of the transfer model beginning Fall 2003
CAS Usage Statistics and Satisfaction Survey Results
• Over 10,000 student accounts in CAS• 109,138 hits on CAS website per week• 15,745 forms have been processed
through ACETS since its inception• CAS satisfaction survey results
• 89% feel CAS has useful information• 81% find CAS user friendly
• 94% would use CAS again
AzCAS Developments
Development and Pilot of ATF Chatlines Original deliverable of CAS RFP Online chair report form and meeting notes Allows institutions to update ATF membership
information
Academic Curriculum Routing and Evaluation System ACRES is fully implemented at Central Arizona College and is being piloted by ASU College of Liberal Arts and Sciences and School of Business. Arizona Western College is preparing to pilot ACRES in early 2004.
AzCAS Future Developments
Arizona Transfer Pathway Guides
Transfer Student Ombudsperson Application
AGEC Planning Guides and Course Lists
ASSISTDevelopments
All institutions are current in their submission of ASSIST dataASSIST is being utilized by colleges for management information and decision makingASSIST continues to be utilized for Carl Perkins III reporting and Student Right to KnowUniversity data documentation completeCommunity college data documentation is underway and is scheduled for completion in SeptemberData documentation is the final deliverable in the original ASSIST agreementASSIST training will continue as needed
How did we get here…
Convey a common understanding how the systems have grownMany enhancements to the CAS systems since inception of the projectRequests for system enhancements have come from institutions and have been prioritized and approved by APASCRecognize a need for support plan for mission critical applicationsSystems need to be sustained for model to be successful
Where do we need to go..
APASC commitments Develop strategic plan for technical
support systems in collaboration with annual budget request
Develop multi-stage process for the evaluation of the transfer model
Staff Support for AzCAS Systems
An additional technical person is requested Provide support continuity for current mission critical
systems, such as the CEG, Transfer Guides, and ATAC communication (ACETS)
Maintain growth of new software applications in support of the transfer model and those supporting it
Keep underlying technical environment at expected support levels
Keep pace with emerging technologies to avoid obsolete systems. For example: Server-to-server protocols Data exchanges Interfaces to various SIS
ATASS Funding 2003 & 2004
FY03: $569,900 (including adjustments) The state funded $217,100 of the $225,700
requested and $3,400 was reverted to the state mid-year.
The community college and university sectors each provided $178,100 in match money.
Notes: The university sector match is divided equally among
ASU, NAU, and UofA. The community college sector match is divided by
FTSE.
ATASS Funding FY 2004
FY04: $566,914 The state request is for $213,700. The community college and university
sectors will each provide $176,607 in match money.
Adjusted FY04 Budget including proposed new hire is $641,914.
New Systems Analyst ($75,000) will be funded in FY04 with ATASS carryforward funds.
FY 2004 Request Summary
State Community Colleges
Universities ATASS Carryforward
Total
Continuation
$213,700
$176,607 $176,607 000,000 $566,914
Proposed new hire
000,000 000,000 000,000 $75,000 $75,000
Totals $213,700
$176,607 $176,607 $75,000 $641,914
ATASS Funding FY 2005: Proposal Continuation budget request
The state will be asked to fund $227,100. The community college and university sectors
are each being asked to provide $186,871 in match money.
Decision package budget request $75,000 for additional technical staff line The community college and university sectors
are each being asked to provide $37,500. Note: Combined requested from each
sector: $224,371
Scenarios for FY 2005 Funding
Best case scenario for Decision Package Funding Each sector would fund a portion of the $75,000 The remaining portion of the position funding
would come from ATASS carryforward This would be determined after FY 2004 based
on state revertmentsWorst case scenario for Decision Package Funding Each sector would fund $37,500
Each sector needs to commit to the worst case scenario for Systems Analyst position to be hired in FY 2004
FY05 Request Summary
State Community Colleges
Universities
Total
Continuation
227,100 186,871 186,871 600,842
Decision 000,000 37,500 37,500 75,000
Totals 227,100 224,371 224,371 675,842