ataturk, islam, modernity and turkish education a comparative, historical analysis
DESCRIPTION
Ataturk, Islam, Modernity and Turkish Education a Comparative, Historical AnalysisTRANSCRIPT
-
Atatiirk, Islam, Modernity and Turkish Education:
A Comparative, Historical Analysis
by
Jennifer Ashkenazi (Coburn)
A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
(Educational Policy Studies)
at the
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON
2007
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
UMI Number: 3279013
IN F O R M A T IO N TO U S E R S
The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy
submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and
photographs, print bleed-through, substandard margins, and improper
alignm ent can adversely affect reproduction.
In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript
and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized
copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion.
UMIUMI Microform 3279013
Copyright 2007 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company.
All rights reserved. This microform edition is protected against
unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code.
ProQuest Information and Learning Com pany 300 North Zeeb Road
P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 481 06 -1 34 6
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
A dissertation entitled
Atatiirk, Islam and Modernity in Turkish Education: A Comparative-Historical Analysis
Submitted to the Graduate School o f the University o f W isconsin-Madison
in partial fulfillment o f the requirements for the degree o f Doctor o f Philosophy
Jennifer Ashkenazi (Coburn)
Date o f Final Oral Examination: May 11, 2007
Month and Year Degree to be awarded: M ay/August 2007
Approval Signatures o f Dissertation Committee
Signature, Dean o f Graduate School
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction 1
Abstract iv
Chapter 1 Theoretical, Methodological and Historical Considerations 9
M ethodology 10
Current State o f Research 14
Chapter 2 The Shifting State of Islam in Education: Transitions from the 31
Ottoman Empire
Religion and State Power within the Ottoman Forces o f 32
M odernization and Nationalism
Islamic Education 35
Ottoman Education 39
Chapter 3 Secularization and the Presence of Islam in Early Turkish 51
Education
Life in the New Turkish Republic 52
Kemalism 57
The Philosophy o f Ziya Gokalp and Kemalist Ideology 66
Kemalist Disestablishment o f Islam 71
Education in the Republic o f Turkey 78
Organization o f Schools 86
Chapter 4 Ambiguities of Islamic Values in Turkish Educational Policy 91
in the Single Party Era
A New Brand o f Islam: Kemalism and National Educational 93
Policies
Religious Courses 103
Degrees o f Control: The Uneven Penetration o f Secular Kemalism 112
in 1920s Turkey
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ii
Chapter 5 Politics and Religious Education in the 119
Multi-Party Era 1960-1980
The M odernization o f the M ilitary and Keeper o f Kemalist 120
Secularism
Turkish Society and Politics 1950-1980 124
The 1961 Constitution 129
International Relations 130
Religious Education Reform 1946-1980 131
Imam-Hatip Schools 133
Chapter 6 Ozalist Paradigm of Modernity: Sanctioning Religious 137
Education
The Last Sultan in Republican Clothes 138
The 1980 Coup 139
The 1982 Constitution 142
Ozalism 146
Turkey's Economic Transformation and Foreign Relations 150
The Turkish Islamic Synthesis 155
Ozalism M anifested in Turkish Education 158
Universal Ideals and Globalization in Educational Reforms 162
Chapter 7 Return to Islamic Heritage: Compulsory Religious Education 170
Religious Education Policies after 1980 170
Special Committees on Religious Education 173
The Reports o f Atay and Giirta: Arguments for Compulsory 175
Religious Education
Turkish Conferences on National Education and Special Seminars 178
for Religious Education
Religious Education and the 1982 Constitution 185
Turkish Ideology in 1980s Curriculum 189
The Regulation o f Religious Education in 1980s Turkey 195
Turkish Religious Education Abroad 202
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
Chapter 8
Conclusion
Bibliography
Revival of Islamic Education or Revival of Kemalism? A 207
Comparative Review of the Atatiirk and Ozal Eras
The Secular and the Neo-Liberal Kemalism: Discontinuities w ith 211
Kemalist Past
Ozal and Tempered Secularism 214
Continuities o f Kemalist Ideology and Religious Education during 219
the Ozal era
Ongoing Challenges Facing Turkish Educational Reform 227
233
239
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ABSTRACT
The Turkish Republic has experienced a rise in Islamic influence in contemporary
politics and in society, culminating in popular support for the Islamic Justice and
Development Party and their new Prime M inister in the 2002 elections. This influence
questions the 'project o f modernity' and the secular ideals upon which the Republic was
founded in 1923. As part o f this 'project o f modernity' Turkish education was centralized
under state control and made secular in 1924; however, Islamic elements continuously
reappear in schools and curriculum and have consequently caused serious public debate
regarding the role o f Islam in state education. Indeed, the relations between religion and
national ideology delve into Turkish infrastructure and reveal a unique view o f the
changing ways Turkish officials have regarded Islam.
In this study I compare national educational reforms during two vital historical
junctures, with particular reference to Islamic and religious education: the Kemalist
Paradigm (1923-1938) and the Ozalist Paradigm o f Modernity, (1983-1993). O f
particular interest for my study is how the changes in secular and traditional values are
expressed in state educational policies. During the years o f Kemalism, Islam was
considered an impediment to instituting western reforms. Islamic elements were removed
from curriculum; religious courses were cancelled; and religious schools were shut down.
The disestablishment o f Islam consequently changed the face o f the Republic. The Ozal
era o f the 1980s relaxed the secular state policies and slowly reintroduced Islamic
elements to official public Turkish life. This period was marked by the Turkish-Islamic
Synthesis - a new element in Turkish society - and a result o f the growing politicization
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
o f Islam in the state. During this period a new Constitution, drafted in 1982, reframed the
place o f Islam in Turkish society. I analyze the balance between Turkish secular ideals
and traditional Islamic values and seek to explore how they are expressed in educational
reform. In a broader sphere, this study alludes to the manner in which Islam operates in a
m odem and westernized society, the historical changes in the nature Islam in the 20th
Century, and the role o f Turkish education in the construction o f a Turk.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
1Introduction. A Comparative Study of Modern Turkish Education:
Islamic Traditions and Western Ideals
"Generally speaking, educational systems and school organizations are
found to be resilient to change and reform. Along with technical
difficulties o f reform and change efforts, educational systems are social
domains where there exist deeply embedded beliefs, myths and symbols
facilitating root causes fo r resistance.
Since its establishment in 1923, the Turkish Republic has dramatically
changed. Modem and western forms of governance and social organization as well as
economic development have launched Turkey into the global market and international
politics. Many scholars attribute Turkish modernization to its programs of progressive
education and secular nationalism, both instituted to counter the religious policies of
the declining Ottoman Empire. Mustafa Kemal Atatiirk introduced secularism to the
Republic when he claimed power in 1923. The states commitment to secularization
notwithstanding, the Turkish government today is struggling with how to reconcile
the religious and national identities of its citizens. Even though the young Republic
"dismantled" Islam as the governing force after 1923, it preserved the presence of
Islam in the social and cultural life in the country.2 This dissertation examines the
Turkeys national educational policies since 1923 in order to shed light on the
1 Weick, 1976, in Hasan Simsek and Ali Yildirm, "Turkey: Innovation and Tradition," G lobal Education Reform , ed. Iris Rothberg (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2004) p. 29.
2 Soon-Yong Pak, At the crossroads o f secularism and Islamism (Turkey) (Unpublished Dissertation, University o f Wisconsin, Madison, 2002).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
ambiguous relationship between Islam and Turkish modernization. The secularization
of the states educational policies, I will argue, paradoxically affected the program of
modernization and the preservation of cultural and moral aspects of Islam in modem
Turkey. In this work, I emphasize the ambiguity of Turkeys secular reforms. I also
highlight the role of religion in the formation of the allegedly secular state (and, by
extension, its educational system), as this issue remains a problem in contemporary
Turkish society.
This study compares two periods in modem Turkey history: the first is the era
which has been called the Kemalist Paradigm of Modernity, under which the secular
Turkish Republic was established and developed in the 1920s and the 1930s; the
second is referred to as the Ozalist Paradigm of Modernity, under which the religious-
Kemalist synthesis was introduced following the 1980 coup.3 These two eras strongly
defined the relations between religion and the state in modem Turkey and the
influence is still felt today, as Turkey endeavors to enter the European Union as the
first Muslim country.
In his efforts to create a modem and democratic nation-state, Mustafa Kemal
Atatiirk called for secularization, or the separation of religion from state, as well as
the institution of Western civic and legal practices. Atatiirk aimed to disestablish the
powerful role of Islam and Islamic elites in Turkish society in order to further his
western reforms. The new Turkish customs, however, remained intertwined with the
old Islamic traditions, and so continued to affect cultural preferences, moral behavior,
and daily practices. Atatiirk believed that the constmction of a national, secular form
of education would play a key role in the creation of new Turkish citizens.
3 Andreas Kazamias uses these terms in his recent book, The Turkish Sisyphus: Atatiirk, Islam and the Quest fo r European Modernity (Athens: Centre o f Comparative Education, International Education Policy and Communication, 2006).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
3Nonetheless, education did not only serve to foster a new, ethnocentric, Turkish
national identity; the Turkish education system under Atatiirk continued to uphold
essential elements of Islam.
Kemalism, with its emphasis on secularism and Turko-centric nationalism,
remained a sacrosanct ideology in the post-Atatiirk era. Yet, the military coup of 1980
marked a turning point for interpretations of secular Kemalism. The coup and the civil
regime that followed it, under the leadership of Turgut Ozal, initiated a new era of a
state-sponsored tolerance for Islam. The military leaders and Prime Minister Turgut
Ozal, of the Motherhood Party, made religious lessons a compulsory element of
national curriculum and endorsed, to a limited extent, an Islamic presence in Turkish
society. This Islamic presence was in part based on the Turkish-Islamic Synthesis
(TIS), a philosophy developed in the 1980s. My study will analyze the impact of the
TIS in national education and how Kemalism was re-interpreted to accommodate
Islamic values.
My research focuses on two, key historical junctures in modem Turkish
history, in which education policies were considered of primary importance. I will
compare and contrast the role of Islam, and religion in general, in the educational
policies in the Kemalist Paradigm of Modernity and Ozalist Paradigm of Modernity,
within their respective historical contexts. One of my main objectives is the
investigation of the rise of Islamic education, especially after the 1980 coup.
Particularly, this study focuses on the ways education was used as a tool by the state,
under both the Kemalist and the Ozalist Paradigms of Modernity.
In analyzing the continuities and the discontinuities of Turkish education
between these two eras, this study uses the methodological tools of the comparative-
historical approach, which will be discussed in the first chapter below. My
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
4examination comprises three main parts: 1. Investigating the presence of Islam in
Turkish educational reforms after its official dis-establishment in 1924; 2. Portraying
the nature of Islam's reappearance in educational reforms after the 1980 coup; and 3.
Articulating, by way of a comparative analysis, the features and implications of the
continued presence of Islam in the general educational system of Turkey during both
eras. Furthermore, this work explores the ways in which secularism and Islam have
interacted and have been expressed in educational reform.
Although sixty years separate them, the two time periods examined here share
key elements: both Atatiirk and Ozal used the tension between modernity and religion
as a means to advance a national ideology and regain social order. They differed in
their approach to secularism, however, with Atatiirk aiming to expunge Islam from
the Turkish society, and Ozal trying to synthesize Islam with the secular Turkish
identity. This comparison of educational reforms in two different epochs in one
country, with an emphasis on their variant paradigms of modernity, reveals changes in
the essential perception of the Turkish national movement and its implementation in
politics. Existing studies of secularism and the modernization process in Turkey have
placed relatively little emphasis on the role of religion in Turkish policy, especially in
the national education policy. My study provides a example of how these policies
offer insight into the development of Islam in Turkish society.
Since 1923, Turkey has designed its education program to achieve the singular
aim of transforming Turkey from a traditional and religiously conservative society
to a modem and western nation. The Ozalist Paradigm of Modernity is the most
recent development in a series of three modernization/westernization reform
movements that have helped shape the current form of Turkish nationalism. These
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
5three reform movements, which will be presented below, are significant for their
illumination of the changing attitudes of the Ottoman-Turkish regimes toward Islam.
This study opens with a survey of current approaches in comparative
education analysis, and is followed by a sketch of the the main traits of the Ottoman
educational reforms. This sketch will help to situate the context of educational
development in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey. The Ottoman modernizing reform
movement occurred under Islamic authoritarian rule, toward the end of the 19th
century. Efforts were made to westernize the Ottoman administration, as well as the
economic and education systems; secular curriculum was expanded with the aim of
educating a larger population, outside of the religious and political elites. The Sultan,
Abdtilhamid II (1876-1908), tried to harmonize Islamic and western traditions, but
was unable to gain support from his subjects. Due to the powerful influence of the
Islamic religious elites, the ulema, his efforts at reform were largely unsuccessful.
Next, this study depicts the second major modernizing/westernizing reform
movement: the Kemalist Paradigm of Modernity, which came about in 1923 under the
leadership of Mustafa Kemal Atatiirk. Atatiirk developed Kemalism as a new national
ideology. Kemalism was organized according to six principles that were formulated as
guidelines for the new Republic: nationalism, republicanism,
reformism/revolutionism, secularism, etatism, and populism. He shifted the new state
from its Islamic beginnings towards a western, secular Republic, thereby
disestablishing the traditional place of Islam within state administration and asserting
a new, western national ideology. Atatiirk achieved this by abolishing the Sultanate
and the Caliphate and by creating the Directorate of Religious Affairs in 1924, which
was supposed to regulate Islam within Turkey.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
6An important tool for the implementation of these reforms was an improved
educational system administered by the state. Kemalism, upon which the newly
formed educational system was based, called for new loyalties - to the Turkish state -
to replace religious and dynastic loyalties of the Ottoman Empire. Education became
the prime transmitter of the Republics new national culture and was therefore
important for cultivating a new intellectual elite. Thus, secularism implied a shift in
Turkish identity from one rooted in community and religion to one bound with
country and nation.4
The actualization of the Kemalism depended upon a modem and western
educational system that would prepare the new citizens to participate in their state.
The stmctures and forms for the new Turkish Republic were modeled after the
political and economic practices of western Europe and the Soviet Union. The
Republican Peoples Party, the ruling party during Atatiirks years, closed the
religious schools, the medreses, and uprooted Islam from the public sphere in the
Republic. Religion was (supposedly) officially eradicated from public school
curriculum in 1928, when the clause stating that Islam was the state religion was
removed from the Constitution.5
This second period of reform lasted the duration of Atatiirks leadership - the
Single-Party Era - from 1923 though 1946. Some of the most important educational
reforms during that time were those that sought to centralize education under the state.
To manage these new duties, Atatiirk established a Ministry of Education and
Directorate of Religious Affairs to enforce the states new regulations and control
secular and religious education. After the introduction of multi-party rule in 1946, the
4Bemard Lewis, The Emergence o f Modern Turkey (London: Oxford University Press, 1961) 134.
5Niyazi Berkes, The Developm ent o f Secularism in Turkey (New York: Routledge, 1998) 477.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
government adopted a more lenient approach towards religious education.
Nevertheless, the Kemalist military upheld the strict secular policies. The influential
military leaders did not allow significant deviations from the secular values written
into the Turkish Constitution.
These early Republic reform movements, one which aimed to harmonize
Islam and westernization in the Ottoman Empire, the other which strived to
westernize the Republic by removing Islam from state policy and governance, provide
important context for understanding the development of the third reform movement in
the 1980s. Recalling the considerable social unrest preceding the coup of 1980, Islam
was reintroduced into the Republics westernized political system and educational
policies in an attempt to unify the Turks. Prime Minister Turgut Ozals main
challenge at the time was to integrate a neo-liberal economic world-view -
encouraging initiatives in an age of globalization - with the conservative sentiments
of a large part of the Turkish population. Furthermore, Ozal and his military allies
wished to uphold the Kemalist secular ideology. After lengthy examination, I argue
that Ozals efforts at compromise, to create a religious-Kemalist synthesis,
accomplished more as a slogan than as an implemented policy.
Major Turkish historians - such as Howard Reed, Andreas Kazamias, and
Joseph Szyliowicz - regard Islams role in the education reform movements as crucial
for understanding contemporary Turkey.6 The last part of this study presents a
comparison of the role of Islam within the educational policies of the Atatiirk and
Ozal periods. In order to assess this role, we will examine the ways in which the
6 Howard A. Reed, Atattirk's Secularizing Legacy and the Continuing Vitality o f Islam in Republican Turkey, ed. Pullapilly Cyriac K., Islam in the Contemporary World (Notre Dame: Cross Road Books, 1980); Andreas Kazamias, Education and the Quest fo r M odernity in Turkey ( London: George Allen & Unwin LDT, 1966); Joseph Szyliowicz, Education and M odernization in the M iddle East (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1973).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
modernization of Turkish society affected education reforms. Considering these
developments, as well as the specific socio-economic situations at the time, this
section presents an alternative interpretation of the role of Islam in Turkeys path to
modernity.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
9Chapter 1. Methodological and Historical Considerations
This dissertation uses a comparative historical approach to suggest a new perspective
on major developments in Turkish education and to enhance our understanding of the
imbrications of religion and Westernization within the modem Turkish education system.
The aim of this section is to situate my study within the field of comparative education, and,
particularly, within the historical comparative approach. In the following pages I present my
methodology vis-a-vis comparative education methodology and the current state of research
in modem Turkish education.
National education, as it was envisaged in Turkey in the 1920s, was one of the
building blocks of the development of Turkish nationalism. Education was a channel through
which modem notions of nationalism and secularism were promoted and could be extended
to the wider Turkish population. During this era, Islam was allegedly removed from all
official state statutes; most notably Islam was removed from the Turkish Constitution in
1928. In keeping with the spirit of secular nationalism, Islam was officially removed from
Turkish national education. Since education was perceived as a significant tool for the
nationalization of the Turkish people, most studies of Turkish education have focused on its
role in the creation of the secular Turkish nationalism. Nevertheless, this study reveals
intricate relations between Turkish education and Islam. The examination below underlines
policies and documents of Turkish education authorities to show the continued presence of
Islam within the Turkish education system. It demonstrates the ways in which Islam
remained part of the nationalization project and, in some respects, was exploited as an
effective tool within this project.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
10
The familiar narrative of modem Turkish history reveals that after Islam was
disestablished within the public spheres and the official policies by Atatiirk, it was
reintroduced in the early 1980s, under the auspices of the military leaders and the
government of Turgut Ozal. This study compares these two time periods to argue in a
different vain. Indeed, the short-lived military dictatorship and the subsequent leadership of
Turgut Ozal initiated noteworthy reforms regarding the reemergence of Islam in the Turkish
society: Islam was written back into the revised 1982 Turkish Constitution and into national
education; Turkish national education was officially considered a principle tool for verifying
and spreading the new reforms. Although the Kemalist ideals of secularism and nationalism
were at the same time strengthened and reified, Islam was recognized as an inseparable part
of Turkish society. However, my comparison of education policies during the Atatiirk and
Ozals eras shows that the reforms of the 1980s were actually a matter of recognizing
patterns that existed and continued in Turkish society since the 1920s. The presence of Islam
was not a new phenomenon, nor was the inclusion of compulsory religious lessons in Turkish
schools. Alongside of the state policies, my comparison highlights the ambiguity of the
language surrounding Islam in official documents and the implicit tolerance towards the
presence of Islam in the state regulated spheres, schools in particular.
Methodology
This dissertation is a comparative historical study of the interactions between
education, politics and religion in these two important periods in modem Turkish history. My
study combines the fields of comparative education and policy studies in an examination of
the Turkish educational policies; the benefits of such a juncture have been recently explored
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
11
by Val Rust.1 Underscoring the interrelations between these fields, this study examines a
broad view of the role of Islam in educational laws and reforms and, in particular, in the
educational developments in two influential periods in Turkish history: the 1920s period of
nation building and secular national development; and the 1980s period of reaffirmation of
Turkish heritage, including the prominence of Islam. Such an analysis enables a relatively
detailed examination of the time periods, which will further enhance our understanding of the
reforms and their significance within the broader context of Turkish education and society.
This methodological approach highlights the role of the historical contexts - the
national, the regional and the global - in the development of an educational system. Many
comparative studies of education have followed one of two distinct paths of research: inter
comparative, in which different states or specific aspects of different states are compared; or
intra-comparative, in which similar or different things of the same nation are compared.2 My
study of Turkish national education falls under the second option, comparing the national
education system of one state, Turkey, in two different time periods, the 1920s/30s and the
1980s. Adhering to Michael Sadlers premise, my comparative approach underlines the need
to incorporate a historical analysis of the society, the things outside school - its cultural,
intellectual, and religious venues - into the comparative research of education.3
The placing of the educational reforms of Turkey within their broader national and
historical contexts enables a multi-dimensional comparison. An important aspect of
comparative education is the premise that the historical development of education has an
influence on the continuing development of the present educational system. As Sweeting
concludes: "[...] by comparing events, ideas and attitudes within one period or between more
1 Val Rust, "Educational Policy Studies and Comparative Education," Learning from Comparing: NewDirections in Educational Research, eds. Robin Alexander et al, (Oxford: Symposium Books, 2000).
2 4.10.06, interview with A. Kazamias in Athens, Greece.
3 Michael Sadler quoted in George Z.F. Bereday, Sir Michael Sadlers Study o f Foreign Systems o f Education, Comparative Education Review (Feb. 1964) 310.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
12
than one, a researcher is able to reach reasoned conclusions about such matters as continuity,
change and development."4 In an investigation of Turkish educational reforms the 1920s and
the 1980s, a historical framework provides a fascinating lens through which scholars can
identify the degree to which the proposed reforms were actually executed.5
This study will focus on the implementation of secularism, the separation of religion
and state, in the Turkish Republic.6 Specifically, I will highlight the interaction of Islam and
secular educational policies. The study begins with a review of Kemalism, or the ideology of
Atatiirk, and an examination of the ways in which culturally significant elements of Islam
remained part of the school system and influenced the education of the new Turkish
citizen. The first part of my analysis examines the social and economic conditions in the
Republics early years, including an examination of the six arrows of Kemalist ideology
and the nature of major educational reforms until 1949 (the year religious courses were again
allowed into Turkish public education). This section will also cover the specific
constitutional measures and the state reports that dealt with educational reform.
The second part of my analysis will examine the reforms that occurred in the Ozalist
era of the 1980s. Paradoxically, during these years the secular Turkish military promoted
Islam in national education in order to re-establish popular control. The education reforms
between 1980 and 1990 show a fascinating development in educational policy formation and
policy implementation, one in which Islam played an important role. The hidden influences
4 Anthony Sweeting, The Historical Dimension: a Contribution to Conversation about Theory and Method inComparative Education, Com parative Education 41.1 (Feb. 2005), p. 29
5 There are limited studies dealing with the issues and challenges facing rural Turkish communities from the Atatiirk Era through the later 1950s; the ones existing are concerned primarily with agriculture or population fluctuation. Therefore it is relevant to look at the policies and laws concerning education in order to deal in a productive manner with Turkish educational reform. Please see John F. Kolars, "Community Studies in Rural Turkey," Annals o f the Association o f American Geographers 52.4 (Dec. 1962).
6 The notion o f secularism as understood in the Turkish Republic will be discussed at length in Chapter 2 below.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
13
of Islam found within the official Turkish ideology and the strong local presence of Islam in
rural areas lie at the very heart of my analysis.
My research about Islam and the educational reforms in Turkey is based on an
examination and comparison of various primary historical sources. These sources include: (a)
the 1924 Turkish Constitution; (b) the 1924 The Basic Law of National Education No. 1739;
(c) the 1924 Unification of Education Law; (d) the 1982 Turkish Constitution; and (e) the
1997 Law No. 4306 for 8-year Compulsory and Uninterrupted Education. These laws are the
primary documents concerning educational legal aspects and policy in Turkey, and hence, are
the foundation upon which the role of Islam in Turkish education has been officially
constructed. Additional primary sources include official state publications dealing with
educational reforms and the subject of religious education from the Ministry, of Education,
the Directorate of Religious Affairs, and the Council for Higher Education. These include the
Tebligler Dergisi (Communication Review) published by the Turkish Ministry of Education
on a bi-weekly basis, the publications of the national conferences organized by the National
Security Council, the Ministry of Education and/or the Directorate of Religious Affairs about
religious education development; the 1990 Report on Education conducted by the Turkish
National Business Association; and various reports released by the Turkish government
about the status of national and religious education (publication dates spanning from 1919 to
2005).
In addition to these official documents, one other report will be used here as a
primary source. Halis Ayhan's study Turkiye'de Din Egitim (Religious Education in Turkey)
between the years 1920 and 1998, is a historical document of many ministerial proceedings
in the Ministries of both Education and Religion.7 In this volume, Ayhan summarizes the
7 Ayhan was a civil servant and was present at the majority o f the religious education meetings held in the 1980s. The importance o f this report is found in the numerous summaries o f official proceedings that are
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
14
different official proceedings and describes some of the unofficial proceedings that occurred
behind the scenes. The debates about the re-integration of religious curriculum in state
schools and the growth of Imam-Hatip schools during the Ozalist era are especially important
for a close examination of popular support (or lack thereof) for later reforms.
Current State o f Research
In modem Muslim societies, where religion finds support in countless formal and
informal contexts, education is often singled out as a vanguard for social change. The case of
education reform in Turkey is a particularly intriguing case study for examining the process
of modernization, and the role of religion, i.e. Islam, within this process. Modernization has
been used by various scholars to denote various social, cultural and technological phenomena
that had a fundamental influence on the changes in social structures and practices in the
recent centuries.8 Since the late Ottoman Empire, the concept of modernization was used by
the advocates of Turkish nationalism; even though they were aware of the diverse notions
related to this concept, they adapted it to suit the national project in Turkey.9 From its first
stages, the reformation of political and social institutions for compatibility with modem
governing methods, technology, commerce and ethics, was shaped in Turkey in a distinctive
way, which correlated with its blend of western and Muslim elements. According to several
scholars, Ottoman and Turkish modernization was shaped mostly as an elite-driven,
consensus-based, institution-building process that took its inspiration exclusively from the
difficult to obtain and not available in other sources. Dr. Halis Ayhan, Turkiye'de Din Egitimi 1920-1998 (Istanbul: M.U.Ihahiya Fakiitesi Yay., 1999).
8 For the different meanings o f Modernity and the difficulties to define it, see: S.N. Eisenstadt, Tradition, Change, and Modernity, (N ew York: Wiley, 1973); Arjun Appadurai, Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions o f Globalization. Public Worlds; V. 1 (Minneapolis: University o f Minnesota Press, 1996); M.Chefdor, R. Quinones, & A. Wachtel (eds.), Modernism: Challenges and Perspectives, Urbana, 1986.
9For specific examples o f modem and western reforms in Turkey, see below Chapter 3.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
15
West.10 Although the Turkish modernization process had clear practical directives, it has
been comparatively slow in its integration into society beyond the national (or Empire) elite.
This slow and uneven infiltration of Turkish modernization notwithstanding, as Bozdogan
and Kasaba pointed out, by the 1920s, the institutional, ritual, symbolic and aesthetic
manifestations of modernity have become constituent elements of the Turkish collective
identity. 11 Due to its unique geographical location and cultural traditions, modernization in
Turkey took indeed a different path than most European nations; nonetheless, this process
affected - to varying degree - a broad section of Turkish society, and considerably
influenced the nationalization of the Turkish people since the Atatiirk era. The same
geographical and cultural circumstances are accountable for the importance of
Westernization in Turkeys modernization endeavor. For Atatiirk and his disciples, the
ambition to modernize the Turkish state was essentially related to imitation - or, more
accurately, adaptation - of Western European bureaucracy, means of production and
education.12
In addition to Secularization and Westernization, Modernization was coupled in
Atatiirks time to the concept of democracy. During the 1920s the democratization of the
state took several forms. As part of his perception of the national community, Atatiirk
encouraged citizens participation in the social and political realms, and sought to broaden
peoples involvement in public decisions, including planned social and economic reforms.
This national directive of democracy was one of the major values that informed the 1923
Turkish Constitution.13 Officially, citizens were granted numerous rights, including the right
10 Sibel Bozdogan and Re$at Kasaba, Introduction, in their Rethinking Modernity and National Identity in Turkey, (Seattle: University o f Washington Press, 1997), 3-4.
11 ibid., 5.
12 Keyder, Caglar. State and Class in Turkey: a Study in Capitalist Development (New York: Verso, 1987).
1 Walter F. Weiker, The Turkish Revolution, 1960-61: Aspects o f M ilitary Politics (Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 1980), 222.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
16
to form political parties, become members and vote in elections; in fact, the gap between the
official declarations and the actual participation that citizens were permitted under Atatiirk
was fully demonstrated in his disapproval of competing political parties. Indeed, under
leadership of Atatiirk, during the Single-Party era, the democratic process was only partially
applied. Citizens could vote, but they did not have options beyond Atatiirks Republican
Peoples Party. The only other political party that Atatiirk allowed to form in 1930 was
quickly shut down, and a soft dictatorship was maintained in the Turkish Republic until the
Multi-Party era of the 1950s.14
Despite the limited implementation of the democratization o f Turkey, it was an
indispensable part of the national ideology. Much like secular and Western ideals, the
democratic values, as understood in the early Republic, needed to be taught to Turkish
citizens. The further development of modem schools thus became crucial to the process of
Turkeys nation building. Schools were already a key instrument in reforming Ottoman
society, especially in the process of secularizing state institutions. Atatiirks administration
emphasized this function of the schools during and after 1920s. Later, in the early 1980s,
schools had a significant role in the official re-introduction of Islamic elements back into
Turkish public life. A great deal of research about Turkey has revolved around the issue of
whether or not Islamic elements should or should not be included into educational policies.
While this is obviously an important question, other questions, such as continuities and
discontinuities regarding Islam in state policy formation, can reveal tendencies that
contribute to our understanding of different trends of Islam in Turkish society today. Past
studies have failed to fully exploit the combination of a historical and comparative approach;
my study is a venture into how this approach can be useful for further research in Turkey.
14 Ibid., 120.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
17
The role of Islam within Turkish education has been examined in a number of studies
in the fields of anthropology, sociology, political science and history. An influential recent
contribution to the field was presented in Islam in Modem Turkey, in which Richard and
Nancy Tapper examine different aspects of education and religion. Among other topics, the
Tappers' book presents reviews of literature and intellectual debates about religion, surveys
the role of religious subjects and Islam in textbooks, and analyzes educational reforms and
the Turkish youth.15 An important chapter in this book is an ethnographic study of Kemalism
and Islamic education in a small Turkish village. In this chapter, the Tappers discuss the
development of Republican ideology, secularism and Islamism in the community and, more
specifically, in the community school. They argue that both Kemalist republicanism and
Islamism can be seen as part of a single ideology, claiming that it is suggested that the
legitimacy of the republican ideology was bolstered through the modern secular education
system, but by means of the appropriation of key concepts from the Ottoman-Islamic
philosophy of knowledge. 16
An additional contributor to the Tappers' volume, Bahattin Akit, wrote about Imam-
Hatip schools, examining the literature surrounding the impact of these schools in Turkish
society. Akits contribution to contemporary knowledge, however, extends beyond his
English writings. In his works in Turkish he examines the rise of private religious education
in Turkey. He recently contributed two chapters to the Turkish reference book Islamcilik
(Islamism), one involving an analysis of the current state of private religious education and
the second about religious influences, including religious education, in Turkish civil
15 Richard Tapper (ed.), Islam in Modern Turkey: Religion, Politics and Literature in a Secular State (New York: I.B. Tauris & Co., 1991).
16 Richard Tapper & Nancy Tapper, Religion, Education and Continuity in a Provincial Town, Islam inModern Turkey: Religion, Politics and Literature in a Secular State , ibid. 57.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
18
society.17 Akit employs sociological methods in his studies of Imam-Hatips, using surveys
and charts to map the development of the system of semi-private schools. He also examines
the debate about Islamic education in a number of books and religious journals, coming to
the conclusion that Islam remained intact during the Atattirk years "in terms of net works and
symbolic codes" and later, after the end of the Single-Party Era, the expansion of religious
education "signaled (Islam's) re-emergence at an official institutional level."18
Additional studies of religious education during the Atatiirk era can be found in
Ahmet Giirta' 1987 book Atatiirk ve Din Egitimi (Atatiirk and Religious Education) and A.
Baki Mert and iner Bal^aci's 1995 publication Tiirkiye'de Din Egitimi (Religious Education
in Turkey).19 These books were published by the Ministry of Religion and the Turkish
Democratic Vafk, respectively. From a limited treatment of these institutions ideological
paradigm, the books underscore varied aspects of the treatment of religious education in the
Single Party Era. In Gurta' study there is an emphasis on Islamic moral treatise whereas
Mert and Bah^aci's study systematically describes the development and policies of religious
education. A third book that offers an alternative to the above includes erafettin Yamaner's
1999 Atatiirkqii Diiiincede Ulusal Egitim (National Education in the Thoughts o f Atatiirk)?9
Yamaner offers a general analysis of Ottoman education traditions which were continued,
albeit modified, in the new Republic. He then goes on to describe the creation of the modem
system of Turkish education, including a description of the juxtaposition of religious and
17 Bahattin Akit & Mustafa Kemal Cojkun, "Ttirkiye'nin Modemlemesi Baglaminda imam-Hatip Okullari" and Bahattin Ak$it, Aye Serdar, Bahar Tabakoglu, "Islami Egilimli Sivil Toplum Kurukujlan," Modern Tiirkiye'de Siyasi Dii.^unce: Cilt 6- Islamcdik (Istanbul: Ileti$im Yayinlan, 2004).
18 Bahattin Akjit, Islamic Education in Turkey: Medrese Reform in Late Ottoman Times and Imam-Hatip Schools in the Republic Islam in Modern Turkey, Richard Tapper, ed. (London: I.B. Tauris & Co Ltd, 1991) 165.
19 Ahmet Gurta, Atatiirk ve Din Egitimi (Ankara: Diyanet lleri Bajkanhgi Yayinlari, 1987); A. Baki Mert and (hner Bah5aci, Tiirkiye'de Din Egitimi (Ankara: Turk Demokrasi Vakfi, 1995).
20 erafettin Yamaner, Atatiirkgii Diiiincede Ulusal Egitim: D insel ve Geleneksel Egitimden Laik ve Qagda$Egitime (Istanbul: Toplumsal D6niium Yayinlan, 1999).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
19
western education. An additional source is Muallim Abdiibaki's 2005 edition of Cumhuriyet
(focugunun Din Dersleri {Religious Lessons o f Republican Children).21 This collection
presents various religious lessons from student's religious (Islamic) books between the years
1927 to 1931, including lessons about holidays, mosques, morals, and Islam in Turkey. A
shorter, but informative, study of religious education in Turkey was completed by Regine
Erichsen.22 Erichsen outlines the major developments and trends from the 1920s until today,
and she analyzes the question of responsibility of a democratic government in a majority
Muslim nation to provide Islamic education to its citizens.
Another comprehensive study of the status of Turkish religious education was
undertaken by Saliha Scheinhardt in her Die Religiose Lage in der TurkeiP Included in her
study is an overview of the debate about the usage of "secular" vs. "laic" in describing
official state policies. She provides a comprehensive summary of the political and social
developments regarding the place of Islam in Turkish society; and the religious education of
Turkish children in Turkey and beyond Turkish borders.
Contemporary advancements in the study of religious education in Turkey have
shown the distinctive importance of the semi-public system of Imam-Hatip schools. A
growing body of literature is devoted to these institutions demonstrates their influence on the
role of Islam in the public sphere o f the Turkish state; these works are best represented by:
1913'den Bugiine Imam Hatip Okullari Meselesi {imam Hatip Schools from 1913 until
Today) by the Nahit Dinner and Tiirkye'de Din Egitimi ve Imam Hatipler {Religious
21 Muallim Abdulbaki, Cumhuriyet Qocugunun Din Dersleri (Istanbul: Kaynak Yayinlan, 2005).
22 Regine Erichsen, "Die Religionspolitik im turksichen Erziehungswesen von der Atatiirk-Ara bis heute," Zeitschrift fu r Kulturaustausch 2 (1988).
23 Scheinhardt first examines the teaching o f religious topics in Turkey, and then moves on to describe thesituation o f Turkish school children elsewhere, primarily in Germany Saliha Scheinhardt, Die Religiose Lagein der Ttirkei: Perspektiven des islamischen Religionsunterrichts fu r tixrkische Kinder in der D iaspora(Berlin: Klaus Schwarz Verlag, 1986).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
20
Education and Imam Hatips in Turkey) by Mehmet Ali Goka9ti.24 Recep Kaymakcan of
Sakarya University has also published a number of articles regarding teacher education and
9 Sthe practice of religious education in Turkey. Kaymakcan's comprehensive dissertation
compares the systems of religious education in Turkey and England, focusing on religious
curriculum.26 This study is not only a detailed examination of the history and development in
religious education, Kaymakcan also provides an excellent analysis of the curriculum and
teaching methods of Turkish religious education in secondary schools. He compares the
Single-Party Era and the Multi-Party Era of the 1950s and the situation of religious education
within the political and cultural contexts. Another source for the understanding of Turkish
education within a comparative international framework is the writing of Ghulam Nabi
Saqib, whose book, Modernization o f Muslim Education in Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey
preceded recent developments.27
Recent studies also accentuate the important role of teachers as the intermediates
between governmental policies and actual reality in classrooms. Nurallah Alta of Ankara
University, and a specialist in the field of religion and Islam in teacher education, wrote
(fokkiiltiirluluk ve Din Egitim (Cultural Enhancement and Religious Education), in which he
examines religion in teacher education and explains the methods used in teaching religion in
contemporary Turkey. He details the different methods which have been used in schools
and in religious teacher training programs. Beyza Bilgin, also of Ankara University,
24 Nahit Din?er, 1913'den Bugiine imam Hatip Okullari Meselesi (Istanbul: ule Yayinlan, 1998); Mehmet Ali Gokagti, Tiirkye'de Din Egitimi ve Imam Hatipler (Istanbul: Iletijim Yayinlan, 2005).
25 Recep Kaymakcan, "Religious Education in the Multi-Party Period in Turkey," East/W est Education (1997); "A Shift from Confessional RE towards the Pluralistic RE: Presentation o f Christianity in Turkish RE Textbooks," Conference at LaSalle University, Philadelphia, (July 2004).
26 Recep Kaymakcan, Christianity in Turkish Religious Education, Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, Sakarya University, 1998.
27 Ghulam Nabi Saqib, M odernization o f Muslim Education in Egypt, Pakistan, and Turkey: A Comparative Study, (Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1969).
28 Nurallah Alta, fokkulturliduk ve Din Egitim (Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim, 2003).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
21
published in 1980 Tiirkiye'de Din Egitimi ve Liselerde Din Dersleri (Religious Education in
Turkey and Religious Lessons in Lises).29 Bilgin devotes most of her study to teaching
methods of religious education and how this process has developed in modem Turkey. She
also published two shorter studies related to the principle of laicism and its relationship to
state and religion in Turkey.30
Another noteworthy movement connected to religious education in Turkey is the
Giilen movement and its system of schools. As shown in M. Hakan Yavuz and John L.
Espositos Turkish Islam and the Secular State,31 the Giilen movement is one of the more
successful Islamic modernist movements that has developed in Turkey in the last fifty years.
Exploring the movement and its schools, Yavuz and Esposito describe the methods in which
Giilens ideology combined Islamic belief with modem forms of learning. The founder,
Fetullah Giilen, is a member of the Nurcu movement, which has roots reaching back to the
Nak?ibandi, a Sufi movement within Islam. Explaining the development of Giilen's ideas and
the construction of his education system, this study enhances our general understanding of
the role played by the ideas of Islam in the secular Turkish state. Of special interest is the
emphasis laid by the authors on the Giilen tendency to avoid an outright pronouncement of
the schools exclusively Islamic nature. However, while the Giilen educational system
illustrates a relationship between private schools with a decidedly Islamic tendency, these
schools do not lie within the jurisdiction of the Turkish Ministry of Education and, hence, the
29 Beyza Bilgin, Tiirkiye'de Din Egitimi ve Liselerde Din D ersleri (Ankara: Emel Matbaacilik Sanayi, 1980).
30 Beyza Bilgin and Regine Erichsen, "Der Religionsunterricht in der Tiirkei und sein religionspolitischer Kontext," Zeitschrift fu r Padigogik 35.3 (1989); Beyza Bilgin, The Understanding o f Religious Education in a Country where there is Separation o f Religion and State: The Example o f Turkey, British Journal o f Religious Education 15 (1993).
3IM. Hakan Yavuz and John L. Esposito (eds.), Turkish Islam and the Secular Stale (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 2003).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
22
Giilen institutions do not fully illustrate the process of negotiation experienced between IslamI T
and the Turkish secular state.
Comprehensive historical studies of the modernization of education in Turkey, both
before and after the demise of the Ottoman Empire, have provided important insight into
Turkish education. Andreas Kazamias' study, Education and the Quest fo r Modernity in
Turkey, exemplifies the novel enterprises that dominated the field in the second half of the
20th Century.33 In this thorough study, Kazamias portrays the main tendencies in the late
Ottoman education and the ways the educational system was transformed into the Turkish
system after the founding of the Republic. However, the premise of this work presupposed
the penetration of secularization policies in the Republic; today, this presupposition seems to
require revision.
Other studies addressing the education systems in the Middle East have examined the
ways Islamic traditions have interacted with modernization processes. An interesting
perspective on the topic is presented in the now out-dated work of Joseph Szyliowicz,
Education and Modernization in the Middle East, which examines the issues (religion among
others) raised in education in the modernization projects begun in Iran, Egypt and Turkey.34
This book offers a thorough inspection of the ways traditional Islamic education confronted
the introduction of modernization-westemization practices, and describes the educational
system of each country up to the early 1970s. Although Szyliowicz outlines the successes
and failures of each country's progress in the area of education, his study lacks a more
32 The Giilen movement is the subject o f many debates and studies; however, for our purposes here 1 will list just a couple including Elisabeth Ozdalga, "Secularizing Trends in Fethullah Gillen's Movement: Impasse or Opportunity for Further Renewal?" Critique: Critical M iddle Eastern Studies 12.1 (Spring 2003); Bayram Balci, Missionnaires de I lslam en Asie centrale.lles ecoles turques de Fethullah Gu len (Paris: Maisonneuve et Larose; Istanbul: Institut Franc ais detudes Anatoliennes, 2003).
33 Kazamias, ibid., 1966.
j4 Szyliowicz, ibid., 1973.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
23
detailed analysis of curriculum and the language of educational reform policies, which can
reveal subtle negotiations between westernization and Islam.
Furthermore, Szyliowicz also adopts similar premise to Kazamias, arguing that
(Atatiirk) moved quickly to destroy form, substance, and institutional bases of Islam. This
[...] marked the end of the dual system of religious and secular schools. At one stroke
Mustafa Kemal eliminated the cause of the cultural separation which had afflicted Ottoman
Society.35 It is interesting to note that the assessment of Atatiirks success in his
secularization policy is still echoed in scholars writing of the early 1990s. J. Stanford and
E.K. Shaw claim, for instance, that Public education now [after Atatiirks revolution] was
completely divorced from religion and religious lessons were forbidden, leaving them to the
family, or, where they existed, to hocas (religious teachers) maintained privately.36
Statements such as this, still common among last decades scholars reflect a time of
transition in the Republic, in which the outcome of the reforms from the 1980s were not fully
determined. These studies, therefore, leave a great deal of room for present-day scholars to
employ a broader perspective and to revise these analyses.
Consequently, a more complicated image of the interactions between Islam, the
Turkish secular regime and the process of modernization is revealed in several recent
historical studies of Turkish education, such as Etienne Copeaux's 1998 Turk Tarih Tezinden
Turk Islam Sentezine (From the Turkish Historical Thesis to the Turkish Islamic Synthsis);
Necdet Sakaoglu's 2003 Osmali'dan Giinuziize Egitim Tarihi {History o f Education from
Ottoman Times until Today) and Giizver Yiliran and John Dumin's 1997 Recent Perspectives
35 Ibid., 201.
36 J. Stanford and E.K. Shaw, History o f the Ottoman Empire and Modern Turkey, Reform, Revolution and Republic: the Rise o f Modern Turkey, 1808-1975 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977) 386.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
24
on Turkish Education?1 These works provide an intimate glance at the actual educational
programs and practices within the Turkish education system. Copeaux examines public
education history textbooks between the years 1931 to 1993. He presents Turkish national
history between these formative years, which included the later period of the Atatiirk era and
the Ozal era. It is a helpful source for my study due to its description of what the Turkish
Ministry of Education included in national curriculum. Sakaoglu provides a rich
chronological survey of general education practices from the modernization attempts duringI D
the Ottoman Empire through the establishment of the Turkish Republic. Yiliran and
Dumin's book is an edition of separately collected studies about different facets of Turkish
education, including a closer look at institutions themselves, educational philosophy,
instruction, and scholasticism in Turkey. Despite the impressive scope of these studies, they
do not focus specifically on an analysis of the relationship between Turkish educational
policy and its cultural and historical context. While incorporating these studies, my research
seeks to look beyond the institutions themselves and address the interrelations between the
governmental tendencies in religious education and the cultural context.
Recent studies of the social and cultural contexts of 20th century Turkey have taken
modernization as a key concept. The juxtaposition of education and modernization is
examined closely in the Turkish intellectual discourse of the recent years.39 In his seminal
study about Turkish education, Turk Egitim Tarihi {Turkish Educational History), Yahya
Akyiiz provides a full historical analysis of Ottoman and Turkish education, including the
37 Etienne Copeaux, Turk Tarih Tezinden Turk Islam Sentezine (Istanbul: Tilrkiye Ekonomik ve Toplumsal Tarih Vakfi Yayindir, 2000); Necdet Sakaoglu, Osmali'dan Giinumuze Egitim Tarihi (Istanbul: Istanbul Bilgi Universitesi Yayinlan, 2003); Guzver Yiliran and John Durnin, Recent Perspectives on Turkish Education (Bloomington: Indiana University Turkish Studies Publications, 1997).
38 In fact, this is one o f the few studies which includes photos o f each era that demonstrate the diverse educational practices o f Turkey.
Works such as Fatma Gok's 75 Yilda Egitim (Education at 75 Years) and O. Kafadar's Turk egitim diiuncesinde batildat>ma ( Westernism in Turkish Educational Thought) exemplify the characteristics o f this tendency. Fatma Gok, 75 Ydda Egitim (Istanbul: Tarih Vakfi Yayinlan, 1999); Osman Kafadar, Turk egitim duuncesinde batdila$ma (Ankara: Vadi Yayinlan, 1997).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
25
continuities and discontinuities of educational development after the establishment of the
Turkish republic.40 Ismail Giiven's 2000 book Tiirkiye'de Devlet Egitim ve Ideoloji (State
Education and Ideology in Turkey) incorporates various philosophies of ideology and
nationalism before moving on to examine national ideology in Turkish education in the
1950s and after.41 Bozkurt Giiven^'s 1998 History o f Turkish Education: Special Issue o f
Education and Science clearly articulates advancements and progress in Turkish education
and schooling beginning with ancient Turks and ending with modem times.42
Although Giiven? highlights these developments effectively, such a vast time frame
precludes an in-depth inspection. A closer study o f the Turkish Education in the time periods
that are in the core of this dissertation appears in Kemal Inans 2004 book, Egitim ve Iktidar
{Education and Government). This study examines democratic and nationalist values in
Turkish textbooks in periods of political strife and military intervention: 1960-1962 and
1980-1983.43 The focus here is on the relationships between democratic and nationalist
values in textbooks and the political and educational practices of the military regimes.44 Inan
concludes that in the periods of military intervention nationalist values were clearly
emphasized over democratic values in texts. Contrasting nationalist and democratic
tendencies, Inan discusses briefly religion and laicism in the context o f specific democratic
values in Turkish school textbooks and outlines the development of laic values in Turkey.45
A similar study, though smaller in scale, is Barak Salmoni's examination of education and
40This book has been reprinted a number o f times; the latest edition: Yahya Akyiiz, Turk Egitim Tarihi (Istanbul: ALFA Basim Yayim Dagitim Ltd., 2001).
41 Ismail GUven, Tiirkiye'de D evlet Egitim ve Ideoloji (Ankara: Siyasal Kitabevi, 2000).
42 Bozkurt Giiven?, History o f Turkish Education: Special Issue o f Education and Science (Ankara: Turkish Education Association, 1998).
43 Kemal Inan, Egitim ve iktidar: Tiirkiye'de Ders Kitaplarinda D em okratikve Milliyetgi D egerler (Ankara: Utopia Yayinevi 2004).
44 Ibid., 345.
45 Ibid., 227.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
26
democracy between the years 1923-1950.46 Salmoni asserts that education "as both evolving
pedagogic discourse and curriculum affords us one of the best means by which to understand
what official and semi-official Turkey perceived democracy to be, and in what terms they
presented it to the first cohorts of republican citizens passing through a central organ of mass
socialization."47
Despite growing interest of recent scholarship in the interrelations between education
and culture in Turkey, the extensive body of scholarship on the history of Turkish education,
and on religious education in particular, lacks a comprehensive evaluation of the relationship
of education and the growth o f Islamic movements and political support. Research along this
track is important in light of the contemporary process of state reforms in preparation for
Turkey's entrance into the European Union. In studies of Turkish education, scholars have
overestimated the influence of secularization and modernization during the two major
periods of Turkish modernization. Because government policies were organized according to
a top-down model, centered on the elite classes and the state bodies, scholars maintained that
the secular efforts had been successful. The laws were clear about the new role of Islam
contained within national laws and the public face, including social, political and economic
success, had become a model for reform in developing countries. The current situation of
Islamism in Turkey leads scholars to question the validity of these early conclusions about
the 'project of modernity.'
Traditionally, studies of Turkish nationalism and secularism in the early Turkish
Republic, such as Caglar Keyder, Gotthard Jaschke and Daniel Lemer, were enclosed in
discussions of its success or its failure, both from the standpoint of its implementation by
46 Barak Salmoni, "Ordered Liberty and Disciplined Freedom: Turkish Education and Republican Democracy, 1923-1950," M iddle Eastern Studies 40.2 (March 2004).
47 Ibid., 81.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
27
the government and its acceptance in society.48 Current studies, like Suna Kilis account of
Kemalism, show that the tendency to treat the Turkish paradigm of modernization, including
the application of secular policies, within a limited frame still attract contemporary
scholarship.49 Further scholarship, however, led by a distinguished group of Turkologists -
including Kemal Karpat, Niyazi Berkes, Erik Ziircher, Andrew Mango, Bernard Lewis, erif
Mardin and Uriel Heyd - have raised questions on specific interactions of Islam and
modemization-westemization within Turkey. Bernard Lewis well-known studies explored
the role of Islam in the development of Middle-Eastern nation-states. Lewis' books The
Multiple Identities o f the Middle East and The Emergence o f Modern Turkey are of particular
interest for our study.50 In this historical study, Lewis describes the events leading to the
establishment of the Turkish Republic, from the late Ottoman era, through the Young Turk
era continuing to the 1950s. He intimates that the laic principles of the Republic were
successful in separating Islam from the state. In his well-known book The Emergence o f
Modern Turkey, he argues, The basis of Kemalist religious policy was laicism, not
irreligion; its purpose was not to destroy Islam, but to disestablish it - to end the power of
religion and its exponents in political, social, and cultural affairs, and limit it to matters of
belief and worship.51 Lewis does not present further details on the subject of the national
policies made about Islam, especially education. While Islam was banished to a large degree
among the modem, elite political and social classes in urban areas, it remained a crucial -
48 Keyder, Caglar. The definition o f a peripheral economy: Turkey, 1923-1929 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981); Keyder, 1987; Gotthard Jaschke, D er Islam in der neuen Tiirkei (Leiden: E.J. Brill, 1951); Daniel Lemer, The Passing o f Traditional Society: Modernizing the M iddle East (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1958).
49 Suna Kili, The Atatiirk Revolution: A Paradigm o f Modernization (Istanbul: Ktiltiir Yayinlan, 2003).
50 Bernard Lewis, The Emergence o f Modern Turkey (London: Oxford University Press, 1961) and The Multiple Identities o f the M iddle East (New York: Schocken Books, 1999).
51 Lewis, ib id , 1961,412.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
28
and visible - part of the daily life of Turkish villagers in the periphery. Thus, though he
presents a more composite approach, Lewis assessment of the success of the secularization
of the Turkish society resembles the conclusions of other studies on the Turkish Republic.
Kemal Karpat, the author of numerous books and groundbreaking papers, has
contributed significantly to our understanding of political, social and economic transitions
that have occurred in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic.53 In particular, in his
1959 volume Turkey's Politics: the Transition to a Multiparty System and the 1973 collection
he edited, Social Changes and Politics in Turkey: A Structural-Historical Analysis, Karpat
provided an intriguing analysis of the history of Turkish politics.54 In these studies he details
the dialectic between the principles of liberalism adopted by the leaders of the Ottoman
Empire and the Turkish Republic and the autocratic ideals for which their leaders strived. His
more recent publication, The Politicization o f Islam, draws on extensive, often under-utilized
resources to reveal how Islam was a rich part of the tapestry of Ottoman and Turkish identity
in the 19th and early 20th Centuries. Karpat argues that Islam remained a deep part of the
changing identities during a period of social, cultural, economic and political transformation;
the politicization of Islam was a process by which Islam was molded into a
political/nationalist ideology.55 Karpats conclusions shed interesting light on several works
that examine the relations between ideology and culture in modem Turkey.
52 This notion is more fully explored in anthropological and sociological studies such as: Jenny White, Islamist Mobilization in Turkey: A Study in Vernacular Politics (Seattle: University o f Washington Press, 2002);Deniz Kandiyoti and A yje Saktanber, Fragments o f Culture: The Everyday o f Modern Turkey (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2002).
53 Kemal Karpat, The Politicization o f Islam: Reconstructing Identity, State, Faith and Community in the Late Ottoman State (Oxford: University Press, 2001).
54 Kemal Karpat, Turkey's Politics: The Transition to a M ultiparty System (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1959); (ed.) Social Changes and Politics in Turkey: A Structural-Historical Analysis (Leiden: Brill, 1973).
55 Karpat, 2001, 421. The above mentioned studies are only few examples o f Karpats contributions to ourknowledge o f the interactions between religion and modernism, which construct the amalgamate nature o f theTurkish identity.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
29
In his study The Development o f Secularism in Turkey, Niyazi Berkes provides a
pioneering look at the process of secularization that began in Turkey after its founding.56
Berkes claims that on many levels secularization had worked and was contributing to
Turkey's new role in international politics. He includes a discussion of the cultural, social and
economic spheres of Turkish society and examines the successes and failures of the
pioneering attempts of Turkish modernization until the 1960s. Uriel Heyd's works from the
1950s about the Turkish language reform and Turkish nationalism include important
examples of how language was an instrument of the new Turkish state to solidify its goals
and ideology.57 Erik Ziircher, Andrew Mango and erif Mardin's work provide further
analyses of Turkish history and social change, looking at modem Turkish history, Atatiirk'sc o
life and Islamic issues in Turkey, respectively. Javid Saeed's book Islam and Modernization
deals more generally with the question of how Islam is negotiated in modem Middle Eastern
societies, including Turkey.59 Exploring the subject in Egypt, Pakistan and Turkey, within
their respective social and political contexts, Saeed claims that the basic problems
confronting the Islamic world are due to incorrect interpretation and neglect of the Quran,
and he questions the notion that modernization is compatible with Islam (but at the same time
does not make allowances for fundamentalism). This interpretation makes Karpats depiction
of the actual process of the inclusion of Islam within modem Turkish identity all the more
intriguing.
56 Berkes, ibid.
57 Uriel Heyd, Foundations o f Turkish Nationalism, The Life and Teachings o fZ iya Gokalp (London: William Clowes and Sons Limited, 1950); Language Reform in Modern Turkey (Jerusalem: Oriental Notes and Studies, 1954).
58 Erik J. Ziircher, Turkey: A Modern History (London: I.B. Tauris Publishers, 1993); Andrew Mango, The Turks Today (London: John Murray, 2004); Atatiirk: The Biography o f the Founder o f Modern Turkey (Woodstock: The Overlook Press, 2000); erif Mardin, Religion and Social Change in Modern Turkey: the Case o f Bediuzzaman Said Nursi (Albany: State University o f N ew York, 1989).
59 Javid Saeed, Islam and Modernization (Westport: Praeger Publishers, 1994).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
30
While Ottoman and Turkish educational systems and reforms are mentioned in this
last group of historical studies about Turkey and the Ottoman Empire, education is not their
main focus. These scholars mention education as a tool for modernization and
westernization, but do not delve into Turkish educational practices, nor address the role of
education as an important site for examining the process of secularization in the Republic.
My study draws on these studies as key references for understanding Turkish society, but I
will highlight educational policy for a fresh look at the role of Islam and the process of
secularization in Turkey.
As shown above, the most prominent scholarly literature provides various theories
about the role of Islam in Turkish culture and its influence on education. My study is
complemented by these works, but is also situated in a broader discourse about the potential
and actual relations between Islam and modernization, and about the role of religion in a
"public sphere." Several studies were dedicated to these relations. The works by John
Esposito and F rancis Burgat, Gregory Starrett, Walter Armbrust, Jose Casanova are, of
course, inevitable studies for any scholar of this field. The majority of these studies focus on
the transformation process from the Ottoman Empire into the Turkish Republic. Within this
context, these works emphasize the ways in which Islam was disestablished from official
nationalist ideology.60 Noticeably fewer studies underscore Turkish education in the
periphery and its relations with the process of secularization. As the following analysis will
show, education played an important role in this process, both in national development and
within common culture; indeed, education provided hidden avenues for Islam to retain its
place in Turkish culture.
60John Esposito and Francois Burgat (eds.), Modernizing Islam: Religion in the Public Sphere in Europe and the Middle East (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 2003); Gregory Starrett, Putting Islam to Work: Education, Politics, and Religious Transformation in Egypt (Berkeley: University o f California Press, 1998); Walter Armbrust, Mass Culture and Modernism in Egypt (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996); Jose Casanova, Public Religions in the Modern World (Chicago, London: University o f Chicago Press, 1994).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
31
Chapter 2. The Shifting State of Islam in Education: Transitions from the
Ottoman Empire
The modernization of Turkish education in the Atatiirk and Ozal eras cannot be fully
appreciated without presenting the reforms preceding their development under Ottoman rule.
The intersection of Ottoman and Turkish elements in social and political institutions is
multifaceted, and the intricate development of modern Turkish identity is reflected in the
advancements of the new education system. Despite the radical break with Ottoman society,
it was impossible to impede all formal and informal cultural traditions. In any case, Karpat
pointed out, the Turks identity developed within the frame of the multiple identities of
modernity, Ottomanism, Islamism, and Turkishness. Each was based on concrete historical,
religious and linguistic foundations and, despite the state's manipulation of all of these
identities for its own interest; they left a lasting imprint on contemporary Turks identity and
personality. 1 In light of the importance of education in the formation of Turkish national
identity, and the complex influences on this process, this chapter will concentrate on one
significant facet of the intersection of Turkish identity formation and education: the
modernization of traditional Ottoman education, including the prominent role of traditional
Islamic learning.
The Ottoman Empire was established in 1299 and reached its zenith in the 16th and
17th centuries. The basic political structure of the Empire was theocratic in nature; the sultan
1 Karpat, ibid., 2001, 373; for a more detailed analysis, please see chapter 16 "Turkishness o f the Community: from Religious to Ethnic-National Identity," 353-374. Fortna did research on the specifics o f the kindergarten in its transfer from Ottoman to Turkish authority; he makes an interesting case that actually the institution itself did not change after the establishment o f the Republic in 1923; rather with the 1913 education law that declared many o f the existing schools under the Ottoman government. (Benjamin C. Fortna, "The Kindergarten in the Ottoman Empire and the Turkish Republic," ed. Roberta Wollons Kindergartens and Cultures (N ew Haven: Yale University Press, 2000)).
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
32
was simultaneously responsible for his subjects religious and national well-being, and in
turn, they pledged their allegiance to him. The sultan was also the Caliph, or the spiritual
leader of Muslims, and he traditionally led the Ottoman people politically, spiritually and
morally. Although it rivaled Europe until the 17th Century, the Ottoman Empire was not able
to maintain its powerful status and was slowly overwhelmed by its economic distress and
military defeats. In the later years, especially in the 19th Century, the need for modem
educational practices became apparent. Conflicts arose, though, as religious leaders opposed
what they perceived as threats to Islamic traditions (and, evidently, to their own authority and
elite position within Ottoman society).2
However, the conservatism was not categorical. Ottoman authorities welcomed
changes that would strengthen Islamic moral and ethical traditions but felt threatened by
reforms which could lessen their intellectual authority, and claimed that new knowledge from
the West might contradict Islamic values and traditions. Modem (European) reforms were
enacted to some degree and with some success in the 1800s, especially in the 1860s. The
reforms, nonetheless, did not succeed in reaching the general Ottoman populace, nor did they
successfully convince religious authorities of the need for strong reform in Islamic education.
After 1923, the Turkish government restructured the educational system according to western
reforms, which did not emphasize Islamic education.
Religion and State Power in the Development o f
Ottoman Modernization and Nationalism
The need to reform the traditional governing structure in the later days of the Empire
revealed the challenge of modem identity perceptions. The threat of European occupation
2 Benjamin Fortna has pointed out in his study that in fact some Islamic education leaders participated and encouraged western developments in the Ottoman Empire, but I maintain that a majority o f the ulema did not embrace many o f the western reforms. B. Fortna, Imperial Classroom: Islam, the State, and Education in the Late Ottoman Empire. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.)
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
33
and the tide of capitalism, which increased in the 19th Century, spurred on new growth and
development in the Ottoman Empire. Under their own internal struggles and the external
pressure from Europe to reform their political systems, the Ottomans were forced to conceive
a notion of collective identity that did not contradict the multi-ethnical nature of the empire
and, at the same time, would strengthen political power under the sultan. Traditional Islamic
social and political systems were reformed in order to preserve other aspects of Ottoman
culture, such as a revised (reduced) role of religion in politics, the introduction of European
trends in the Ottoman education system, the introduction of privatization and reformed
trading agreements. Developed in this historical framework, a new Ottoman nationalism was
thus based on revised social and political groups, which used language and religion to secure
legitimization.
In exchanging the traditional medieval systems of social organization for modem and
western forms, the Ottoman state was faced with tremendous upheaval that lasted until the
founding of the Turkish Republic in 1923. The fundamental reforms that were initiated in the
modernization of the Ottoman Empire were economic restructuring, a re-organization of the
armed forces and technological improvement in fighting and weaponry, and the creation of a
modem educational system. The Ottoman state could not implement these reforms very
quickly, due to the complications in accommodating the new systems of education and
military.4 The reform of the millet system is a helpful example in showing the complex
transformations that characterized this phase in the Empires history.
A millet, in the Ottoman sense, was a semi-autonomous cultural religious
community.5 For non-Muslim Ottoman citizens, identity was officially tied to a millet, either
J Karpat, 2001, ibid., 9.
4 Further discussions o f general Ottoman modernization reforms are found in Berkes, ibid.; Bernard Lewis,ibid., 1961; Binnaz Toprak, Islam and Political Development in Turkey (Leiden: Brill, 1981).
5 Karpat, 2001, ibid., 310.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission.
-
34
Christian, Armenian, or Jewish. Ottoman Muslims were not officially considered millet, but
they conducted their affairs in a similar way. A millet was allowed the freedom to regulate
and organize its communities according to its specific traditions. This system was a
trademark of the Ottoman success and tradition, and many have claimed that its success was
partly due to autonomous communities living together harmoniously. Karpat notes, the
cardinal principle which assured the survival of this type of organization was the separation
of one group from another and the prohibition of free vertical social mobility.6
Karpats examination of the millet reforms in the 19th Century is an enlightening
study of their transformation.7 As the arrival of nationalism to the Ottoman Empire, the millet
system was eliminated as new administrative systems were instituted; the separate systems of
the millets interfered with the uniformity that the Ottoman government hoped to establish in
the 1860s. He argued that, indeed, the overriding goal of breaking up the old system of
millets was to break down local religious loyalties and promote the idea of Ottomanism.
He asserted, however, that the reforms had other consequences as well. The reforms
indirectly promoted secular ideas and facilitated better communication within new
communities, created as a result of the government reforms. Thus, these reforms threatened
the traditional channel of influence the Ottoman authorities used in maintaining their control
over non-Muslim populations. The new communities also had the effect of making stronger
distinctions between Muslims and non-Muslims. The millet system of community
organization was a huge hurdle for the reform-minded government official, but the hope was
that those who were not members of the millets would become active members of the
Ottoman state.
6 Kemal Karpat, An Inquiry in to the Social Foundations o f Nationalism in the Ottoman State: From Social Estates to Classes, From M illets to Nations (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1973) 7.
7 Karpat, ibid., 91.
Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without per