attachment 5 noise modelling reports by wartsila · noise modelling reports by wartsila noise data...
TRANSCRIPT
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 5 Noise Modelling Reports by Wartsila Noise Data Sheet
Noise Impact Study – Day and Evening Time
Noise Impact Study – Night-time
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ATTACHED NOISE MODELLING REPORTS WERE PREPARED FOR THE PREVIOSLY APPROVED PLANNING APPLICATION (SD15A/0061), AND ARE STILL APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED NEW SCHEME.
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 5 Noise Modelling Reports by Wartsila Noise Data Sheet
Noise Impact Study – Day and Evening Time
Noise Impact Study – Night-time
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ATTACHED NOISE MODELLING REPORTS WERE PREPARED FOR THE PREVIOSLY APPROVED PLANNING APPLICATION (SD15A/0061), AND ARE STILL APPLICABLE TO THE PROPOSED NEW SCHEME.
Grange BackUp Power LtdM Grange Castle Power Plant
|E0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue AGROU P 17/11/2016
Attachment 5Noise Modelling Reports by WartsilaNoise Data Sheet
Noise Impact Study — Day and Evening Time
Noise Impact Study — Night-time
PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ATTACHED NOISE MODELLING REPORTS WERE PREPARED FOR THEPREVIOSLY APPROVED PLANNING APPLICATION (SD15A/0061), AND ARE STILL APPLICABLE TOTHE PROPOSED NEW SCHEME.
|E0311313-22-RP-0002_A_O1.DOCXFormal Issue
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
CONFIDENTIAL Data sheetTitle: Noise Data Grange Backup Power Ltd.
7xW18V50DFDoc.ID: DBAD344899
Revision:
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Approved by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 26.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Organisation: - GeneralPower Plants
Project : IN070 – WFI-P ENG
convVB3n.docx
Noise Data Sheet Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF
1. Engine
a. Sound power level
Sound power level of the engine, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] 117 123 121 122 124 123 125 125 119 132
Sound power level is based on measurement made according to standard ISO 9614-2:1996 Acoustics -- Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound intensity --Part 2: Measurement by scanning. This is to be treated as primary noise data for engine.
b. Spatial averaged sound pressure level
Typical spatial averaged A-weighted sound pressure level inside engine hall is 110 dB(A). The spatial average sound pressure value represents noise incident on engine hall walls and could then be used for power plant structure acoustic design.
c. Surface averaged sound pressure level
Typical surface averaged A-weighted sound pressure level of Wärtsilä genset is 115 dB(A) at 1 m distance. In case of separate concrete engine cell installation, absorption material may be needed in the engine cell to reduce unnecessary reflections and reach the stated value.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of 80 mm concrete wall + 200 mm insulation + 100 mm concrete wall
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Rw
TL [dB] - 41 44 44 52 60 68 75 82 56
CONFIDENTIAL Data sheetTitle: Noise Data Grange Backup Power Ltd.
7xW18V50DFDoc.ID: DBAD344899
Revision:
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Approved by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 26.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Organisation: - GeneralPower Plants
Project : IN070 – WFI-P ENG
convVB3n.docx
Noise Data Sheet Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF
1. Engine
a. Sound power level
Sound power level of the engine, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] 117 123 121 122 124 123 125 125 119 132
Sound power level is based on measurement made according to standard ISO 9614-2:1996 Acoustics -- Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound intensity --Part 2: Measurement by scanning. This is to be treated as primary noise data for engine.
b. Spatial averaged sound pressure level
Typical spatial averaged A-weighted sound pressure level inside engine hall is 110 dB(A). The spatial average sound pressure value represents noise incident on engine hall walls and could then be used for power plant structure acoustic design.
c. Surface averaged sound pressure level
Typical surface averaged A-weighted sound pressure level of Wärtsilä genset is 115 dB(A) at 1 m distance. In case of separate concrete engine cell installation, absorption material may be needed in the engine cell to reduce unnecessary reflections and reach the stated value.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of 80 mm concrete wall + 200 mm insulation + 100 mm concrete wall
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Rw
TL [dB] - 41 44 44 52 60 68 75 82 56
CONFIDENTIAL Data sheetTitle: Noise Data Grange Backup Power Ltd. Doc.lD: DBAD344899
7XW18V50DFRevision:
W6" RTSIL '0' Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: ApprovedApproved by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 26.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Organisation: - GeneralPower Plants
Project: |N070 — WFl-P ENG
coaB3n.docx
Noise Data Sheet Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7XW18V50DF
1. Engine
a. Sound powerlevel
Sound power level of the engine, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 TotalSound power level LW [dB] 117 123 121 122 124 123 125 125 119 132
Sound power level is based on measurement made according to standard ISO 9614-2:1996Acoustics -- Determination of sound power levels of noise sources using sound intensity --Part 2: Measurement by scanning. This is to be treated as primary noise data for engine.
b. Spatial averaged sound pressure level
Typical spatial averaged A-weighted sound pressure level inside engine hall is 110 dB(A). Thespatial average sound pressure value represents noise incident on engine hall walls and couldthen be used for power plant structure acoustic design.
0. Surface averaged sound pressure level
Typical surface averaged A-weighted sound pressure level of Wértsila genset is 115 dB(A) at1 m distance. In case of separate concrete engine cell installation, absorption material may beneeded in the engine cell to reduce unnecessary reflections and reach the stated value.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of 80 mm concrete wall + 200 mminsulation + 100 mm concrete wall
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 RWTL [dB] - 41 44 44 52 60 68 75 82 56
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 2 (3)
2. Exhaust gas outlet
Exhaust gas outlet sound power level without silencer, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] 143 140 133 129 123 122 131 135 - 146
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of exhaust gas silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
TL [dB] 31 33 38 42 39 48 48 46 33
SCR attenuation [dB] 3 6 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
3. Ventilation room
Ventilation room sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] - 109 105 109 108 107 107 107 103 116
One unit per engine.
Attenuation: L=1800 mm baffles + 600 mm extra baffles
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Attenuation [dB], 1800 mm 3 9 17 30 47 55 55 49 36
Attenuation [dB], 600 mm - 3 6 12 17 17 20 15 8
4. Ventilation outlet
Ventilation outlet sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] - 110 107 109 108 105 105 105 101 116
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Silencer, L = 2800 mm
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Attenuation [dB] - 5 14 29 37 37 22 15 14
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 2 (3)
2. Exhaust gas outlet
Exhaust gas outlet sound power level without silencer, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] 143 140 133 129 123 122 131 135 - 146
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of exhaust gas silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
TL [dB] 31 33 38 42 39 48 48 46 33
SCR attenuation [dB] 3 6 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
3. Ventilation room
Ventilation room sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] - 109 105 109 108 107 107 107 103 116
One unit per engine.
Attenuation: L=1800 mm baffles + 600 mm extra baffles
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Attenuation [dB], 1800 mm 3 9 17 30 47 55 55 49 36
Attenuation [dB], 600 mm - 3 6 12 17 17 20 15 8
4. Ventilation outlet
Ventilation outlet sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB] - 110 107 109 108 105 105 105 101 116
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Silencer, L = 2800 mm
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000
Attenuation [dB] - 5 14 29 37 37 22 15 14
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 2 (3)
2. Exhaust gas outlet
Exhaust gas outlet sound power level without silencer, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 TotalSoundpowerlevel[dB] 143 140 133 129 123 122 131 135 - 146
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Octave-band transmission loss of exhaust gas silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000TL [dB] 31 33 38 42 39 48 48 46 33SCR attenuation [dB] 3 6 9 12 12 12 12 12 12
3. Ventilation room
Ventilation room sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 TotalSound power level LW [dB] - 109 105 109 108 107 107 107 103 116
One unit per engine.
Attenuation: L=1800 mm baffles + 600 mm extra baffles
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000Attenuation [dB], 1800 mm 3 9 17 30 47 55 55 49 36Attenuation [dB], 600 mm - 3 6 12 17 17 20 15 8
4. Ventilation outlet
Ventilation outlet sound power level, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 TotalSound power level LW [dB] - 110 107 109 108 105 105 105 101 116
One outlet per engine.
Attenuation: Silencer, L = 2800 mm
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000Attenuation [dB] - 5 14 29 37 37 22 15 14
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 3 (3)
5. Ultra low noise 6-fan cooling radiator during day and evening time at 69% and during night time at 58% radiator fan speed
Sound power level for one radiator unit, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB], day & evening time - 88 88 86 86 83 76 69 68 93
Sound power level Lw [dB], night time - 84 84 82 82 79 72 65 64 89
Six radiator units per engine.
6. Heights at each noise source and obstacle
Noise source/obstacle Height [m]
Exhaust stack 23
Ventilation room 4.3
Ventilation outlet 20.7
Radiators 17.9
Engine hall 13
Pump house 5
Compact workshop and warehouse 5
Fire/raw water tank 10.8
LFO storage tank 12.6
LFO tank (dirty) 3.6
LFO tank (clean) 5.4
SCR reagent tank 5.4
Data for environmental impact assessment use only - not to be taken as guaranteed values.
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 3 (3)
5. Ultra low noise 6-fan cooling radiator during day and evening time at 69% and during night time at 58% radiator fan speed
Sound power level for one radiator unit, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 Total
Sound power level Lw [dB], day & evening time - 88 88 86 86 83 76 69 68 93
Sound power level Lw [dB], night time - 84 84 82 82 79 72 65 64 89
Six radiator units per engine.
6. Heights at each noise source and obstacle
Noise source/obstacle Height [m]
Exhaust stack 23
Ventilation room 4.3
Ventilation outlet 20.7
Radiators 17.9
Engine hall 13
Pump house 5
Compact workshop and warehouse 5
Fire/raw water tank 10.8
LFO storage tank 12.6
LFO tank (dirty) 3.6
LFO tank (clean) 5.4
SCR reagent tank 5.4
Data for environmental impact assessment use only - not to be taken as guaranteed values.
Document ID: DBAD344899 Revision: 3 (3)
5. Ultra low noise 6-fan cooling radiator during day and evening time at 69% andduring night time at 58% radiator fan speed
Sound power level for one radiator unit, ref. 1pW:
Frequency [Hz] 31.5 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 8000 TotalSound power level LW [dB], day & evening time - 88 88 86 86 83 76 69 68 93Sound power level LW [dB], night time - 84 84 82 82 79 72 65 64 89
Six radiator units per engine.
6. Heights at each noise source and obstacle
Noise source/obstacle Height [m]
Exhaust stack 23
Ventilation room 4.3
Ventilation outlet 20.7
Radiators 17.9
Engine hall 13
Pump house 5
Compact workshop and warehouse 5
Fire/raw water tank 10.8
LFO storage tank 12.6
LFO tank (dirty) 3.6
LFO tank (clean) 5.4
SCR reagent tank 5.4
Data for environmental impact assessment use only - not to be taken as guaranteed values.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day and Evening Time Doc.ID: DBAD227072
Revision: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (4)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: IN070 / WFI-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day and Evening Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in International Standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: general calculation method. The actual software implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source properties are defined as source noise emission or sound power level data at standard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31.5…8000 Hz with corresponding attenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation grid locations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point results under meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. The noise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such as ambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant when radiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 69 % (304 rpm) at day and evening time, EG-set running at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawing DBAD255939 rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sources Equipment Amount Attenuation
W18V50DF engine 7 Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mm
+ concrete 80 mm Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR Ventilation inlet room 7 L=1800 mm + 600 mm extra baffles Ventilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators (ultra low noise)
42
Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per radiator, 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard and reflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day and Evening Time Doc.ID: DBAD227072
Revision: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (4)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: IN070 / WFI-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day and Evening Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in International Standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: general calculation method. The actual software implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source properties are defined as source noise emission or sound power level data at standard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31.5…8000 Hz with corresponding attenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation grid locations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point results under meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. The noise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such as ambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant when radiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 69 % (304 rpm) at day and evening time, EG-set running at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawing DBAD255939 rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sources Equipment Amount Attenuation
W18V50DF engine 7 Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mm
+ concrete 80 mm Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR Ventilation inlet room 7 L=1800 mm + 600 mm extra baffles Ventilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators (ultra low noise)
42
Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per radiator, 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard and reflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Doc.lD: DBAD227072
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day and Evening Time . .ReVISIon: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
WARTSILA Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (4)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: |N070 /WFl-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Day andEvening Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in InternationalStandard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics — Attenuation of sound duringpropagation outdoors — Part 2: general calculation method. The actualsoftware implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source propertiesare defined as source noise emission or sound power level data atstandard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31 .5...8000 Hz with correspondingattenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation gridlocations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point resultsunder meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. Thenoise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such asambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant whenradiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 69 % (304 rpm) at day and evening time,EG-set running at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sourcesEquipment Amount Attenuation
Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mmW18V50DF engine 7 + concrete 80 mm
Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCRVentilation inlet room 7 L=18OO mm + 600 mm extra bafflesVentilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per(ultra low noise) 42 radiator, 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard andreflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 2 (4)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wärtsilä power plant noise impact is estimated at 5 noise sensitive locations (NSL) marked NSL1, NSL2, NSL3, NSL4 and NSL5 as seen on the noise map in page 4. These same measurement locations are presented in the Environmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1: Description of Noise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used as existing background noise levels (LAeq and LA90) in Table 2 and 3 during day and evening time, including the distance from the noise monitoring points to the proposed site boundary. Day and evening time noise levels were measured at all 5 NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during day and evening time is shown on the 5th column in Table 2 and 3 respectively. Cumulative noise level column shows the estimated total level including noise impact from Wärtsilä power plant and existing background noise level. The difference between cumulative noise level and background noise level at each location is shown on the 7th column in Table 2 and 3. In this model, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurement parameter for the cumulative noise level.
Table 2. Day time environmental noise levels Receiver
point Distance
from proposed
site boundary
[m]
Existing back-
ground day time
noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground day time
noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact day time
LAeq [dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 47 43 37...40 48 1
NSL2 430 50 41 35...38 50 0
NSL3 110 46 43 46...49 51 5
NSL4 340 54 48 38...41 54 0
NSL5 690 60 44 30...33 60 0
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 2 (4)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wärtsilä power plant noise impact is estimated at 5 noise sensitive locations (NSL) marked NSL1, NSL2, NSL3, NSL4 and NSL5 as seen on the noise map in page 4. These same measurement locations are presented in the Environmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1: Description of Noise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used as existing background noise levels (LAeq and LA90) in Table 2 and 3 during day and evening time, including the distance from the noise monitoring points to the proposed site boundary. Day and evening time noise levels were measured at all 5 NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during day and evening time is shown on the 5th column in Table 2 and 3 respectively. Cumulative noise level column shows the estimated total level including noise impact from Wärtsilä power plant and existing background noise level. The difference between cumulative noise level and background noise level at each location is shown on the 7th column in Table 2 and 3. In this model, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurement parameter for the cumulative noise level.
Table 2. Day time environmental noise levels Receiver
point Distance
from proposed
site boundary
[m]
Existing back-
ground day time
noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground day time
noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact day time
LAeq [dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 47 43 37...40 48 1
NSL2 430 50 41 35...38 50 0
NSL3 110 46 43 46...49 51 5
NSL4 340 54 48 38...41 54 0
NSL5 690 60 44 30...33 60 0
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 2 (4)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wértsila power plant noise impact is estimated at 5 noise sensitivelocations (NSL) marked NSL1, NSL2, NSL3, NSL4 and NSL5 as seen onthe noise map in page 4. These same measurement locations arepresented in the Environmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1:Description of Noise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used asexisting background noise levels (LAeq and LAgo) in Table 2 and 3 duringday and evening time, including the distance from the noise monitoringpoints to the proposed site boundary. Day and evening time noise levelswere measured at all 5 NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during day andevening time is shown on the 5th column in Table 2 and 3 respectively.Cumulative noise level column shows the estimated total level includingnoise impact from Wértsila power plant and existing background noiselevel. The difference between cumulative noise level and backgroundnoise level at each location is shown on the 7th column in Table 2 and 3.In this model, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressurelevels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurement parameter for thecumulative noise level.
Table 2. Day time environmental noise levelsReceiver Distance Existing Existing wartsila Cumulative Difference
point from back- back- power noise level LAeqproposed ground ground plant LAeq [dB(A)]
site day day time impact [dB(A)]boundary time noise day time
[m] noise LAgo LAeqLAeq [dB(A)] [dB(A)]
[dB(A)]NSL1 225 47 43 37...4O 48 1
NSL2 430 50 41 35...38 5O 0
NSL3 110 46 43 46...49 51 5
NSL4 340 54 48 38...41 54 O
NSL5 690 60 44 30...33 60 O
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 3 (4)
Table 3. Evening time environmental noise levels
Receiver point
Distance from
proposed site
boundary [m]
Existing back-
ground evening
time noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground evening
time noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact evening time LAeq [dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 50 48 37...40 50 0
NSL2 430 47 45 35...38 48 1
NSL3 110 51 47 46...49 53 2
NSL4 340 52 48 38...41 52 0
NSL5 690 61 47 30...33 61 0
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 3 (4)
Table 3. Evening time environmental noise levels
Receiver point
Distance from
proposed site
boundary [m]
Existing back-
ground evening
time noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground evening
time noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact evening time LAeq [dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 50 48 37...40 50 0
NSL2 430 47 45 35...38 48 1
NSL3 110 51 47 46...49 53 2
NSL4 340 52 48 38...41 52 0
NSL5 690 61 47 30...33 61 0
Document ID: DBAD227072 Revision: b 3 (4)
Table 3. Evening time environmental noise levelsReceiver Distance Existing Existing wartsil'a Cumulative Difference
point from back- back- power noise level LAeqproposed ground ground plant LAeq [dB(A)]
site evening evening impact [dB(A)]boundary time time evening
[m] noise noise time LAeqLAeq LA90 [dB(A)]
[dB(A)] [dB(A)]NSL1 225 50 48 37...4O 50 O
NSL2 430 47 45 35...38 48 1
NSL3 110 51 47 46...49 53 2
NSL4 340 52 48 38.41 52 O
NSL5 690 61 47 30...33 61 O
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
NSL 2
NSL 1
NSL 5
NSL 4
NSL 3
35 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
50 dB(A)45 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
35 dB(A)40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
800
800
900
900
1000
1000
1100
1100
1200
1200
1300
1300
1400
1400
1500
1500
1600
1600
1700
1700
1800
1800
1900
1900
2000
2000
2100
2100
2200
2200
2300
2300
2400
2400
2500
2500
2600
2600
2700
2700
2800
2800
2900
2900
3000
3000-8
00
-800
-700
-700
-600
-600
-500
-500
-400
-400
-300
-300
-200
-200
-100
-100
0 0
100
100
200
200
300
300
400
400
500
500
600
600
Grange Backup Power Ltd7 x W18V50DF
Radiator fan speed 69 % day and evening timeDBAD227072 rev. bBased on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-
Power plant noise impact studyValues are indicative only - not guaranteedTolerance 0...+3 dB(A)
Scale 1 : 9000
> 35.0 dB dB(A) > 40.0 dB dB(A) > 45.0 dB dB(A) > 50.0 dB dB(A) > 55.0 dB dB(A) > 60.0 dB dB(A) > 65.0 dB dB(A) > 70.0 dB dB(A) > 75.0 dB dB(A) > 80.0 dB dB(A) > 85.0 dB dB(A)
Point Source Area Source vert. Area Source Building Cylinder Receiver Calculation Area
Date: 23.01.15 File: Grange Backup Power Ltd_Day&EveningTime.cna
Power PlantsWärtsilä Finland Oy
NSL 2
NSL 1
NSL 5
NSL 4
NSL 3
35 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
50 dB(A)45 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
35 dB(A)40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
800
800
900
900
1000
1000
1100
1100
1200
1200
1300
1300
1400
1400
1500
1500
1600
1600
1700
1700
1800
1800
1900
1900
2000
2000
2100
2100
2200
2200
2300
2300
2400
2400
2500
2500
2600
2600
2700
2700
2800
2800
2900
2900
3000
3000-8
00
-800
-700
-700
-600
-600
-500
-500
-400
-400
-300
-300
-200
-200
-100
-100
0 0
100
100
200
200
300
300
400
400
500
500
600
600
Grange Backup Power Ltd7 x W18V50DF
Radiator fan speed 69 % day and evening timeDBAD227072 rev. bBased on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-
Power plant noise impact studyValues are indicative only - not guaranteedTolerance 0...+3 dB(A)
Scale 1 : 9000
> 35.0 dB dB(A) > 40.0 dB dB(A) > 45.0 dB dB(A) > 50.0 dB dB(A) > 55.0 dB dB(A) > 60.0 dB dB(A) > 65.0 dB dB(A) > 70.0 dB dB(A) > 75.0 dB dB(A) > 80.0 dB dB(A) > 85.0 dB dB(A)
Point Source Area Source vert. Area Source Building Cylinder Receiver Calculation Area
Date: 23.01.15 File: Grange Backup Power Ltd_Day&EveningTime.cna
Power PlantsWärtsilä Finland Oy
300
500
600
400
.I. ... |..800 900
fi?_- Mk5 T Eli-1m
I'M...
800 900
..‘llll‘llll‘llrillrillllll‘llll‘llll‘llll‘ll1000 1 100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800
1000 1 100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 220!
ll‘llll‘llll‘llrillrillllll‘llll‘llll‘llll‘llll‘l...|....|..1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900 3000
Grange Backup Power Ltd7 x W18V50DF
Radiator fan speed 69 % day and evening timeDBAD227072 rev. bBased on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-
Power plant noise impact studyValues are indicative only - not guaranteedTolerance 0...+3 dB(A)
Scale 1 : 9000
l:| > 35.0 dB dB(A) + Point SourceE> 40.0 dB dB(A) Area Sourcel:| > 45.0 dB dB(A) vert. Area SourceZ> 50.0 dB dB(A) S BuildingS > 55.0 dB dB(A) 0 CylinderE > 60.0 dB dB(A) 8 ReceiverE > 65.0 dB dB(A) : Calculation AreaE > 70.0 dB dB(A)E > 75.0 dB dB(A)E > 80.0 dB dB(A)E > 85.0 dB dB(A)
Date: 23.01.15 File: Grange Backup Power Ltd_Day&EveningTime.cna
Power Plantswartsila Finland 0y
500
600
l|
I40
0l
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time Doc.ID: DBAD227074
Revision: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: IN070 / WFI-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in International Standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: general calculation method. The actual software implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source properties are defined as source noise emission or sound power level data at standard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31.5…8000 Hz with corresponding attenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation grid locations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point results under meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. The noise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such as ambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant when radiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 58 % (255 rpm) at night time, EG-set running at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawing DBAD255939 rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sources Equipment Amount Attenuation
W18V50DF engine 7 Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mm +
concrete 80 mm Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR Ventilation inlet room 7 L=1800 mm + 600 mm extra baffles Ventilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators (ultra low noise)
42
Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per radiator, 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard and reflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time Doc.ID: DBAD227074
Revision: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: IN070 / WFI-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in International Standard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics – Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors – Part 2: general calculation method. The actual software implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source properties are defined as source noise emission or sound power level data at standard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31.5…8000 Hz with corresponding attenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation grid locations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point results under meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. The noise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such as ambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant when radiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 58 % (255 rpm) at night time, EG-set running at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawing DBAD255939 rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sources Equipment Amount Attenuation
W18V50DF engine 7 Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mm +
concrete 80 mm Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCR Ventilation inlet room 7 L=1800 mm + 600 mm extra baffles Ventilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators (ultra low noise)
42
Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per radiator, 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard and reflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
CONFIDENTIAL StudyTitle: Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Doc.lD: DBAD227074
Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time . .ReVISIon: b
Author: Godwin Agbenyoh Status: Approved
WARTSILA Checked by: Virpi Hankaniemi / 22.01.2015 Pages: 1 (3)
Approved by: Antti Ouni / 22.01.2015
Project number and name: |N070 /WFl-P ENG
Model_description.docx
Noise Impact Study Grange Backup Power Ltd. 7xW18V50DF Night Time
Calculation method
The modelling is made according to the method described in InternationalStandard ISO 9613-2 Acoustics — Attenuation of sound duringpropagation outdoors — Part 2: general calculation method. The actualsoftware implementation of the method is Cadna A version 4.4.
All the noise sources are defined as point sources. The source propertiesare defined as source noise emission or sound power level data atstandard 1/1-octave band frequencies 31 .5...8000 Hz with correspondingattenuations due to silencers and structures. From these, the overall A-weighted equivalent sound pressure level at receiver or calculation gridlocations is calculated and used height is 1.5 m.
The noise zones drawn to the noise map are receiver grid point resultsunder meteorological conditions favourable to sound propagation. Thenoise model does not take into consideration ambient conditions such asambient background noise levels or short-term wind conditions.
Assumed equipment specification
The model assumed in this document is a W18V50DF power plant whenradiator fan speed at 440 rpm is 58 % (255 rpm) at night time, EG-setrunning at 100 % load and is based on site layout drawing DBAD255939rev.-.
Table 1. Noise sourcesEquipment Amount Attenuation
Concrete 100 mm + insulation 180 mm +W18V50DF engine 7 concrete 80 mm
Engine exhaust stack 7 Silencer 45 dB(A) + SCRVentilation inlet room 7 L=1800 mm + 600 mm extra bafflesVentilation outlet fan 7 Ventilation outlet silencer 2800 mm
Cooling radiators Noise level 49 dB(A) at 40 m per radiator,(ultra low noise) 42 100 % fan speed
The ground at site area and surroundings is assumed to be hard andreflecting. This gives a conservative estimate.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Document ID: DBAD227074 Revision: b 2 (3)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wärtsilä power plant noise impact is estimated at 2 noise sensitive locations (NSL) marked NSL1 and NSL2 as seen on the noise map in the next page. These same measurement locations are presented in the Environmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1: Description of Noise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used as existing background noise levels (LAeq and LA90) in Table 2 during night time, including the distance from the noise monitoring points to the proposed site boundary. Night time noise levels were measured at only 2 NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during night time is shown on the 5th column in Table 2. Cumulative noise level column shows the estimated total level including noise impact from Wärtsilä power plant and existing background noise level. The difference between cumulative noise level and background noise level at each location is shown on the 7th column in Table 2. In this model, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurement parameter for the cumulative noise level.
Table 2. Night time environmental noise levels Receiver
point Distance
from proposed
site boundary
[m]
Existing back-
ground night time
noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground night time noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact night time LAeq
[dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 48 45 35...38 48 0
NSL2 430 44 41 33...36 45 1
Document ID: DBAD227074 Revision: b 2 (3)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wärtsilä power plant noise impact is estimated at 2 noise sensitive locations (NSL) marked NSL1 and NSL2 as seen on the noise map in the next page. These same measurement locations are presented in the Environmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1: Description of Noise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used as existing background noise levels (LAeq and LA90) in Table 2 during night time, including the distance from the noise monitoring points to the proposed site boundary. Night time noise levels were measured at only 2 NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during night time is shown on the 5th column in Table 2. Cumulative noise level column shows the estimated total level including noise impact from Wärtsilä power plant and existing background noise level. The difference between cumulative noise level and background noise level at each location is shown on the 7th column in Table 2. In this model, the equivalent continuous A-weighted sound pressure levels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurement parameter for the cumulative noise level.
Table 2. Night time environmental noise levels Receiver
point Distance
from proposed
site boundary
[m]
Existing back-
ground night time
noise LAeq
[dB(A)]
Existing back-
ground night time noise LA90
[dB(A)]
Wärtsilä power plant
impact night time LAeq
[dB(A)]
Cumulative noise level
LAeq [dB(A)]
Difference LAeq
[dB(A)]
NSL1 225 48 45 35...38 48 0
NSL2 430 44 41 33...36 45 1
Document ID: DBAD227074 Revision: b 2 (3)
Power plant noise impact and cumulated noise levels
Wértsila power plant noise impact is estimated at 2 noise sensitivelocations (NSL) marked NSL1 and NSL2 as seen on the noise map in thenext page. These same measurement locations are presented in theEnvironmental Report document chapter 8, Table 8.1: Description ofNoise Monitoring Points.
Measurement results presented in the Environmental Report are used asexisting background noise levels (LAeq and LAgo) in Table 2 during nighttime, including the distance from the noise monitoring points to theproposed site boundary. Night time noise levels were measured at only 2NSLs.
Estimate of Grange Backup power plant noise impact during night time isshown on the 5th column in Table 2. Cumulative noise level column showsthe estimated total level including noise impact from W'artsila power plantand existing background noise level. The difference between cumulativenoise level and background noise level at each location is shown on the7th column in Table 2. In this model, the equivalent continuous A—weightedsound pressure levels LAeq is only considered as the noise measurementparameter for the cumulative noise level.
Table 2. Night time environmental noise levelsReceiver Distance Existing Existing Wéirtsila Cumulative Difference
point from back- back- power noise level LAeqproposed ground ground plant LAeq [dB(A)]
site night night impact [dB(A)]boundary time time night
[m] noise noise time|-Aeq LA90 LAeq
[dB(A)] [dB(A)] [dB(A)]NSL1 225 48 45 35...38 48 O
NSL2 430 44 41 33...36 45 1
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
NSL 2
NSL 1
35 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
35 dB(A)40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
700
700
800
800
900
900
1000
1000
1100
1100
1200
1200
1300
1300
1400
1400
1500
1500
1600
1600
1700
1700
1800
1800
1900
1900
2000
2000
2100
2100
2200
2200
2300
2300
2400
2400
2500
2500
2600
2600
2700
2700
2800
2800
2900
2900-8
00
-800
-700
-700
-600
-600
-500
-500
-400
-400
-300
-300
-200
-200
-100
-100
0 0
100
100
200
200
300
300
400
400
500
500
600
600
Grange Backup Power Ltd7 x W18V50DF
Radiator fan speed 58 % night timeDBAD227074 rev. bBased on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-
Power plant noise impact studyValues are indicative only - not guaranteedTolerance 0...+3 dB(A)
Scale 1 : 9000
> 35.0 dB dB(A) > 40.0 dB dB(A) > 45.0 dB dB(A) > 50.0 dB dB(A) > 55.0 dB dB(A) > 60.0 dB dB(A) > 65.0 dB dB(A) > 70.0 dB dB(A) > 75.0 dB dB(A) > 80.0 dB dB(A) > 85.0 dB dB(A)
Point Source Area Source vert. Area Source Building Cylinder Receiver Calculation Area
Date: 23.01.15 File: Grange Backup Power Ltd_Night Time.cna
Power PlantsWärtsilä Finland Oy
NSL 2
NSL 1
35 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
50 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
40 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
35 dB(A)40 dB(A)
45 dB(A)
30 dB(A)
700
700
800
800
900
900
1000
1000
1100
1100
1200
1200
1300
1300
1400
1400
1500
1500
1600
1600
1700
1700
1800
1800
1900
1900
2000
2000
2100
2100
2200
2200
2300
2300
2400
2400
2500
2500
2600
2600
2700
2700
2800
2800
2900
2900-8
00
-800
-700
-700
-600
-600
-500
-500
-400
-400
-300
-300
-200
-200
-100
-100
0 0
100
100
200
200
300
300
400
400
500
500
600
600
Grange Backup Power Ltd7 x W18V50DF
Radiator fan speed 58 % night timeDBAD227074 rev. bBased on site layout drawingDBAD255939 rev.-
Power plant noise impact studyValues are indicative only - not guaranteedTolerance 0...+3 dB(A)
Scale 1 : 9000
> 35.0 dB dB(A) > 40.0 dB dB(A) > 45.0 dB dB(A) > 50.0 dB dB(A) > 55.0 dB dB(A) > 60.0 dB dB(A) > 65.0 dB dB(A) > 70.0 dB dB(A) > 75.0 dB dB(A) > 80.0 dB dB(A) > 85.0 dB dB(A)
Point Source Area Source vert. Area Source Building Cylinder Receiver Calculation Area
Date: 23.01.15 File: Grange Backup Power Ltd_Night Time.cna
Power PlantsWärtsilä Finland Oy
300
500
600
400
.I...700
.I...800
3:53.? ._..i1E!Ii1L'fSTD'l-"i"l"i'
700 800
' f .
*1 _ H.u I '
.lllllrilll‘llrillrillllll‘llll‘llrillrillllllrilll‘llll‘llll‘llllrillwilll‘llll‘llll‘llll‘ll..|....|...900 1000 1 100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200 2300 2400 2500 2600 2700 2800 2900
o dB(A)
, 2
o dB(A). 5 dB(A)
lo dB(A)
900 1000 1 100 1200 11300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000 2100 2200
500
600
l|
I40
0lG
rang
eB
acku
pPo
wer
Ltd
7x
W18
V50
DF
Rad
iato
rfan
spee
d58
%ni
ghtt
ime
DB
AD
2270
74re
v.b
Bas
edon
site
layo
utdr
awin
gD
BA
D25
5939
rev.
-
Pow
erpl
ant
nois
eim
pact
stud
yV
alue
sar
ein
dica
tive
only
-no
tgua
rant
eed
Tole
ranc
e0.
..+3
dB(A
)
Sca
le1
:900
0
l:|
>35
.0dB
dB(A
)+
Poi
ntS
ourc
eE
>40
.0dB
dB(A
)V
l/AAr
eaSo
urce
Z>
45.0
dBdB
(A)
vert.
Are
aS
ourc
eZ
>50
.0dB
dB(A
):|
Build
ingS
>55
.0dB
dB(A
)0
Cylin
der
E>
60.0
dBdB
(A)
8Re
ceive
rE
>65
.0dB
dB(A
):
Calcu
lation
Area
E>
70.0
dBdB
(A)
E>
75.0
dBdB
(A)
E>
80.0
dBdB
(A)
E>
85.0
dBdB
(A)
Dat
e:23
.01.
15Fi
le:
Gra
nge
Bac
kup
Pow
erLt
d_N
ight
Tim
e.cn
a
Pow
erP
lant
sw
art
sila
Fin
land
0y
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 6 Memo on Potential Impact of Electromagnetic Radiation from Development
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 6 Memo on Potential Impact of Electromagnetic Radiation from Development
Grange BackUp Power LtdGrange Castle Power Plant
|E0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue AGROU P 17/11/2016
Attachment 6Memo on Potential Impact of Electromagnetic Radiationfrom Development
|E0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCXFormal Issue
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin Baggot Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(0)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address: College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Directors: A.Cawley, P.Scott.
Electromagnetic fields and Bats: Note on potential for adverse impacts on fauna. The new power station will generate electricity for the national grid at 50 Hz frequency. Electrical equipment which generates or uses AC electricity, as well as conductors which carry it, generate extra low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Anything that runs on electricity generates a magnetic field and also electromagnetic field (EMF). There are many studies that have researched the safety requirements to protect humans for prolonged exposure to EMFs but fewer studies that have clearly established the effects on fauna in the vicinity of the EMF source. In 2006 Nicholls and Racey1 recorded bat activity along an electromagnetic gradient at ten radar installations throughout Scotland in a study that was aimed at seeing if radar could be used as a bat deterrent. Their results revealed that bat activity and foraging effort per unit time were significantly reduced in habitats exposed to an electromagnetic field strength of greater than 2v/m when compared to matched sites registering EMF levels of zero. Even at sites with lower levels of EMF exposure (,2v/m), bat activity and foraging effort was significantly reduced in comparison to control sites. This experiment demonstrated that an electromagnetic signal from a small radar unit with a fixed antenna invariably reduced the foraging activity of bats within 30 m of the unit. Nicholls and Racey suggest that the aversive behavioural response of foraging bats to electromagnetic radiation may be a result of thermal induction. There has been no published testing of use of EMF as a bat deterrent in practice. This experiment used a narrow beam of radar focussed on the area of bat activity. The study noted that greater research was required into looking at different multi-directional patterns of EMF emissions. Therefore the effects of EMF on bats in other scenarios is not fully understood. The majority of electrical and electronic equipment used in the proposed power station will be installed indoors and will be shielded. With the exception stated below, the power station itself will not contain any high-voltage cables or devices. Thus, none of those devices will emit electromagnetic fields strong enough to pose human health concerns. Hence there are no restricted access zones even inside the power station buildings. The sole exception to this will be the interconnection between the power station and existing 110 kV power grid substation. Uninsulated overhead high voltage power lines do generate stronger electromagnetic fields. 1 Nicholls B, Racey PA (2009) The Aversive Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation on
Foraging Bats—A Possible Means of Discouraging Bats from Approaching Wind
Turbines. PLoS ONE 4(7): e6246. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000624
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin Baggot Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(0)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address: College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Directors: A.Cawley, P.Scott.
Electromagnetic fields and Bats: Note on potential for adverse impacts on fauna. The new power station will generate electricity for the national grid at 50 Hz frequency. Electrical equipment which generates or uses AC electricity, as well as conductors which carry it, generate extra low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Anything that runs on electricity generates a magnetic field and also electromagnetic field (EMF). There are many studies that have researched the safety requirements to protect humans for prolonged exposure to EMFs but fewer studies that have clearly established the effects on fauna in the vicinity of the EMF source. In 2006 Nicholls and Racey1 recorded bat activity along an electromagnetic gradient at ten radar installations throughout Scotland in a study that was aimed at seeing if radar could be used as a bat deterrent. Their results revealed that bat activity and foraging effort per unit time were significantly reduced in habitats exposed to an electromagnetic field strength of greater than 2v/m when compared to matched sites registering EMF levels of zero. Even at sites with lower levels of EMF exposure (,2v/m), bat activity and foraging effort was significantly reduced in comparison to control sites. This experiment demonstrated that an electromagnetic signal from a small radar unit with a fixed antenna invariably reduced the foraging activity of bats within 30 m of the unit. Nicholls and Racey suggest that the aversive behavioural response of foraging bats to electromagnetic radiation may be a result of thermal induction. There has been no published testing of use of EMF as a bat deterrent in practice. This experiment used a narrow beam of radar focussed on the area of bat activity. The study noted that greater research was required into looking at different multi-directional patterns of EMF emissions. Therefore the effects of EMF on bats in other scenarios is not fully understood. The majority of electrical and electronic equipment used in the proposed power station will be installed indoors and will be shielded. With the exception stated below, the power station itself will not contain any high-voltage cables or devices. Thus, none of those devices will emit electromagnetic fields strong enough to pose human health concerns. Hence there are no restricted access zones even inside the power station buildings. The sole exception to this will be the interconnection between the power station and existing 110 kV power grid substation. Uninsulated overhead high voltage power lines do generate stronger electromagnetic fields. 1 Nicholls B, Racey PA (2009) The Aversive Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation on
Foraging Bats—A Possible Means of Discouraging Bats from Approaching Wind
Turbines. PLoS ONE 4(7): e6246. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.000624
cawleyElectromagnetic fields and Bats: Note on potential for adverse impacts on fauna.
The new power station will generate electricity for the national grid at 50 Hz frequency.Electrical equipment which generates or uses AC electricity, as well as conductors whichcarry it, generate extra low frequency (ELF) electromagnetic fields. Anything that runson electricity generates a magnetic field and also electromagnetic field (EMF). There aremany studies that have researched the safety requirements to protect humans forprolonged exposure to EMFs but fewer studies that have clearly established the effectson fauna in the vicinity of the EMF source.
In 2006 Nicholls and Racey1 recorded bat activity along an electromagnetic gradient atten radar installations throughout Scotland in a study that was aimed at seeing if radarcould be used as a bat deterrent. Their results revealed that bat activity and foragingeffort per unit time were significantly reduced in habitats exposed to anelectromagnetic field strength of greater than 2v/m when compared to matched sitesregistering EMF levels of zero. Even at sites with lower levels of EMF exposure (,2v/m),bat activity and foraging effort was significantly reduced in comparison to control sites.This experiment demonstrated that an electromagnetic signal from a small radar unitwith a fixed antenna invariably reduced the foraging activity of bats within 30 m of theunit. Nicholls and Racey suggest that the aversive behavioural response of foraging batsto electromagnetic radiation may be a result of thermal induction. There has been nopublished testing of use of EMF as a bat deterrent in practice. This experiment used anarrow beam of radar focussed on the area of bat activity. The study noted that greaterresearch was required into looking at different multi—directional patterns of EMFemissions. Therefore the effects of EMF on bats in other scenarios is not fullyunderstood.
The majority of electrical and electronic equipment used in the proposed power stationwill be installed indoors and will be shielded. With the exception stated below,the power station itself will not contain any high-voltage cables or devices. Thus, noneof those devices will emit electromagnetic fields strong enough to pose human healthconcerns. Hence there are no restricted access zones even inside the power stationbuildings.The sole exception to this will be the interconnection between the power station andexisting 110 kV power grid substation. Uninsulated overhead high voltage power linesdo generate stronger electromagnetic fields.
1 Nicholls B, Racey PA (2009) The Aversive Effect of Electromagnetic Radiation onForaging Bats—A Possible Means of Discouraging Bats from Approaching WindTurbines. PLoS ONE 4(7): 66246. doi:10.1371/j0urna1.p0ne.000624
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin
Te|+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(O)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address:College House, Rock Road. Blackrock. Co. Dublin. Ireland. Directors: A.Cawlev. P.5cott.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin Baggot Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(0)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address: College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Directors: A.Cawley, P.Scott.
However this interconnection will only consist of step-up transformers and the connection to the 110kV substation will be via an underground line. This is unlikely to significantly add to the existing EMF generated by the substation. The existing substation includes several conductors and exposed cables that will emit electromagnetic radiation far in excess of the link from the power station to the substation.
Paul Scott CEnv, MCIEEM Director
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin Baggot Street, Dublin 2, Ireland
Tel+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(0)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address: College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin, Ireland. Directors: A.Cawley, P.Scott.
However this interconnection will only consist of step-up transformers and the connection to the 110kV substation will be via an underground line. This is unlikely to significantly add to the existing EMF generated by the substation. The existing substation includes several conductors and exposed cables that will emit electromagnetic radiation far in excess of the link from the power station to the substation.
Paul Scott CEnv, MCIEEM Director
cawleyHowever this interconnection will only consist of step—up transformers and theconnection to the 110kV substation will be via an underground line. This is unlikely tosignificantly add to the existing EMF generated by the substation. The existingsubstation includes several conductors and exposed cables that will emitelectromagnetic radiation far in excess of the link from the power station to thesubstation.
Paul Scott CEnv, MCIEEMDirector
Scott Cawley, College House, Rock Road, Blackrock, Co. Dublin
Tel+353- (0)1 6769815 Fax +353-(O)1-6769816
Scott Cawley Limited, a Company registered in Ireland, Company No: 453222, Registered address:College House, Rock Road. Blackrock, Co. Dublin. Ireland. Directors: A.Cawlev. P.5cott.
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 7 Flood Risk Information OPW Flood History Map
OPW Eastern CFRAM Map (Drawing No. E09BAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10)
Grange BackUp Power Ltd Grange Castle Power Plant
IE0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue A 17/11/2016
IE0311313-22-RP-0002_A_01.DOCX Formal Issue
Attachment 7 Flood Risk Information OPW Flood History Map
OPW Eastern CFRAM Map (Drawing No. E09BAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10)
Grange BackUp Power LtdM Grange Castle Power Plant
|E0311313-22-RP-0002, Issue AGROU P 17/11/2016
Attachment 7Flood Risk InformationOPW Flood History Map
OPW Eastern CFRAM Map (Drawing No. EOQBAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10)
|E0311313-22-RP-0002_A_O1.DOCXFormal Issue
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
Summary Local Area Report
Map Scale
This Flood Report has been downloaded from the Web site www.floodmaps.ie. The users should take account of the restrictions and limitations relating to the content and use of this Web site that are explained in the Disclaimer box when entering the site. It is a condition of use of the Web site that you accept the User Declaration and the Disclaimer.
2 Results
This Flood Report summarises all flood events within 2.5 kilometres of the map centre.
Map Legend
Flood Points
Multiple / Recurring Flood Points
Areas Flooded
Hydrometric Stations
Rivers
Lakes
River Catchment Areas
1:58,646
Land Commission *
Drainage Districts *
Benefiting Lands *
* Important: These maps do not indicate flood hazard or flood extent. Thier purpose and scope is explained in the Glossary.
Dublin
O 036 323
The map centre is in:
County:
NGR:
1. Griffeen November 2000 05/Nov/2000Start Date:
County: Flood Quality Code:
Additional Information: Photos (6) Reports (9) Press Archive (6) More Mapped Information
Dublin 1
2. Peamount R134 R120 junction Nov 2000 05/Nov/2000Start Date:
County: Flood Quality Code:
Additional Information: Reports (1) Press Archive (1) More Mapped Information
Dublin 3
Report Produced: 28-Jan-2015 16:34
Summary Local Area Report
Map Scale
This Flood Report has been downloaded from the Web site www.floodmaps.ie. The users should take account of the restrictions and limitations relating to the content and use of this Web site that are explained in the Disclaimer box when entering the site. It is a condition of use of the Web site that you accept the User Declaration and the Disclaimer.
2 Results
This Flood Report summarises all flood events within 2.5 kilometres of the map centre.
Map Legend
Flood Points
Multiple / Recurring Flood Points
Areas Flooded
Hydrometric Stations
Rivers
Lakes
River Catchment Areas
1:58,646
Land Commission *
Drainage Districts *
Benefiting Lands *
* Important: These maps do not indicate flood hazard or flood extent. Thier purpose and scope is explained in the Glossary.
Dublin
O 036 323
The map centre is in:
County:
NGR:
1. Griffeen November 2000 05/Nov/2000Start Date:
County: Flood Quality Code:
Additional Information: Photos (6) Reports (9) Press Archive (6) More Mapped Information
Dublin 1
2. Peamount R134 R120 junction Nov 2000 05/Nov/2000Start Date:
County: Flood Quality Code:
Additional Information: Reports (1) Press Archive (1) More Mapped Information
Dublin 3
Report Produced: 28-Jan-2015 16:34
OPW Nationai Flood Hazard Mapping
Summary Local Area ReportThis Flood Report summarises all flood events within 2.5 kilometres of the map centre.
The map centre is in:
County: Dublin
NGR: O 036 323
This Flood Report has been downloaded from the Web site www.floodmaps.ie. The users should take account of therestrictions and limitations relating to the content and use of this Web site that are explained in the Disclaimer box whenentering the site. It is a condition of use of the Web site that you accept the User Declaration and the Disclaimer.
Map Legend
~"'”: Kiwi-ii; “as“ f7?
{SCSICOrcHanceSuru-e Ireland. Allri-htsreserued. Licence No E_N|Z|021EIUIny— .. ___| . .
3.3mm“, Esker North F: .‘ Q Multiple /- RecurringTobie. rnadlugg Esker South ”2*. Ell-fig} FiOOd POIntS
“I. W: Areas Flooded
Merrig “grim—r/ Balgaddir—J :21;t ii-. ? Hydrometric Stations
/ RiversSGUddan '55: iiierstown
Lakesuns I3 _.'FEET“336931 Elallft-mfiieily range
"'_‘ River Catchment Areas'I_ _' '-
Br-zuwnstown "--\_ Elmer-land Ballybene Hangar i I ' . . *
ugh‘tomj Upper ‘--x__ Land CommISSIon'i--. KRaf:- IltoJHE Furmierstown- and
. Ballytlan‘élcarbfi"?'3': Griffin: '—
DPriest 1113:11- J'
$3395! /Hilinantalway
i:-—| Drainage Districts *
. - L-‘i D Benefiting Lands *
* Important: These maps donot indicate flood hazard or
Map Scale 1 :58 646 flood extent. Thier purposeand scope is explained in the
2 Results Glossary.
1. Griffeen November 2000 Start Date: 05/Nov/2000
County: Dublin Flood Quality Code:1
Additional Information: Photos (6) Reports (9) Press Archive (6) More Mapped Information
D 2. Peamount R134 R120 junction Nov 2000 Start Date: 05/Nov/2000
County: Dublin Flood Quality Code:3
Additional Information: Reports (1) Press Archive (1) More Mapped Information
Report Produced: 28-Jan-2015 16:34
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01
!(
!(
!(
!(
Please refer to Camac flood maps E09CAM_EXFCD_C2
09GRIF00383
09GRIF00442
09GRIF00500E
09GRIF00557I
09GRIF00376aJ
302200
302200
302400
302400
302600
302600
302800
302800
303000
303000
303200
303200
303400
303400
303600
303600
2312
00
2312
00
2314
00
2314
00
2316
00
2316
00
2318
00
2318
00
2320
00
2320
00
2322
00
2322
00
[0 100 200 300 400 50050Metres © Ordnance Survey Ireland. All rights reserved. Licence number EN 0021015/OfficeofPublicWorks.
C.C.D.I.
11th June 201511th June 201511th June 2015S.P.
EXTENTFLUVIALHPWCURRENT
Baldonnel Fluvial Flood Extents
E09BAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10Drawing No. :
Map:
Map Type:Source:Map Area:Scenario:
Date :Drawn By :
Map Series :Drawing Scale :
Checked By : Date :Date :Approved By :
The viewer of this map should refer to theDisclaimer, Guidance Notes and Conditions of Use that accompany this map. This draft map isfor consultation purposes only, and should notbe used for any other purpose.
The Office of Public WorksJonathan Swift StreetTrimCo Meath
Elmwood House 74 Boucher RoadBelfastBT12 6RZ
T +44(0) 28 90 667914F +44(0) 28 90 668286W www.rpsgroup.com
1:5,000
Node ID
Legend10% Fluvial AEP Event1% Fluvial AEP Event 0.1% Fluvial AEP EventModelled River CentrelineAFA Extents
Node Label!( Node Point
Page 10 of 12
Baldonnel
@ A3
Node LabelNode Label Water Level (OD) 10% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 10% AEP
Water Level (OD) 1% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 1% AEP
Water Level (OD) 0.1% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 0.1% AEP
09GRIF00557I 66.18 N/A 66.46 N/A 67.40 N/A09GRIF00500E 64.11 N/A 64.34 N/A 65.04 N/A09GRIF00442 62.56 N/A 62.76 N/A 63.42 N/A09GRIF00383 59.04 N/A 59.31 N/A 59.81 N/A
NOTE:REV: DATE:
DRAFTAddition of Camac flood extents and notes.Reordering of flood layers. Addition of Sheet 12.
C1 11/06/15
!(
!(
!(
!(
Please refer to Camac flood maps E09CAM_EXFCD_C2
09GRIF00383
09GRIF00442
09GRIF00500E
09GRIF00557I
09GRIF00376aJ
302200
302200
302400
302400
302600
302600
302800
302800
303000
303000
303200
303200
303400
303400
303600
303600
2312
00
2312
00
2314
00
2314
00
2316
00
2316
00
2318
00
2318
00
2320
00
2320
00
2322
00
2322
00
[0 100 200 300 400 50050Metres © Ordnance Survey Ireland. All rights reserved. Licence number EN 0021015/OfficeofPublicWorks.
C.C.D.I.
11th June 201511th June 201511th June 2015S.P.
EXTENTFLUVIALHPWCURRENT
Baldonnel Fluvial Flood Extents
E09BAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10Drawing No. :
Map:
Map Type:Source:Map Area:Scenario:
Date :Drawn By :
Map Series :Drawing Scale :
Checked By : Date :Date :Approved By :
The viewer of this map should refer to theDisclaimer, Guidance Notes and Conditions of Use that accompany this map. This draft map isfor consultation purposes only, and should notbe used for any other purpose.
The Office of Public WorksJonathan Swift StreetTrimCo Meath
Elmwood House 74 Boucher RoadBelfastBT12 6RZ
T +44(0) 28 90 667914F +44(0) 28 90 668286W www.rpsgroup.com
1:5,000
Node ID
Legend10% Fluvial AEP Event1% Fluvial AEP Event 0.1% Fluvial AEP EventModelled River CentrelineAFA Extents
Node Label!( Node Point
Page 10 of 12
Baldonnel
@ A3
Node LabelNode Label Water Level (OD) 10% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 10% AEP
Water Level (OD) 1% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 1% AEP
Water Level (OD) 0.1% AEP
Flow (m³/s) 0.1% AEP
09GRIF00557I 66.18 N/A 66.46 N/A 67.40 N/A09GRIF00500E 64.11 N/A 64.34 N/A 65.04 N/A09GRIF00442 62.56 N/A 62.76 N/A 63.42 N/A09GRIF00383 59.04 N/A 59.31 N/A 59.81 N/A
NOTE:REV: DATE:
DRAFTAddition of Camac flood extents and notes.Reordering of flood layers. Addition of Sheet 12.
C1 11/06/15
2322
0023
2000
2318
0023
1600
2314
0023
1200
302200
Node Label
Mlle/nun:
302400
Water Level (OD) Flow (male)10% AEP10% AEP
MILLTOWNBaile an Mhuil nn
0302200
50 100 200302400
Water Level (OD) Flow (male)1% AEP
300
1% AEP
400
302600
n
302600
Water Level (OD) Flow (ma/s)0.1% AEP 0.1%AEP
500Metres
302800
302800
6l7/
%/
/
303000
303000
© Ordnance Survey Ireland. All rights reserved. Licence number EN 0021015/OfficeofPublicWorks.
OQGRIFOO383
303200
303200
303400
303400
303600
erange vzslle ,As ress ran
09GR|FOO442
each
refer to Camac floodEOQCAM_EXFCD_CZ
9.5]
BALL BA EAn Bale B n
303600
2322
0023
2000
2318
0023
1600
2314
0023
1200
The viewer of this map should refer to theDisclaimer, Guidance Notes and Conditions ofUse that accompany this map. This draft map isfor consultation purposes only, and should notbe used for any other purpose.
Legend- 10% Fluvial AEP Event- 1% Fluvial AEP Event
0.1% Fluvial AEP Event
Modelled River Centreline
::: AFA Extents
0 Node Point
-Node ID Node Label
DRAFTREV: NOTE:Addition of Camac flood DATE:C1 extents and notes. 11,05,15
Reordering of floodlayers. Addition of Sheet 12.
EASTERN
ltl
Oe"
QN.in O9.9
'o' OPW1“
The 0mm of Punm Hhrk:
‘\;L RPS
Elmwood House T +44(0) 28 90 66791474 Boucher Road F +44(0) 28 90 668286
Ja/
M
Oifix .m unihmum Puihli’
The Office of Public WorksJonathan Swifl SireelTrim Belfast W www.rpsgroup.comCo Meaih BT12 6R2 E [email protected]
Map:
Baldonnel Fluvial Flood Extents
Map Type: EXTENTSource: FLUVIALMap Area: HPWScenario: CURRENTDrawn By: C.C. Date: 11th June 2015Checked By : D.l. Date : 11th June 2015Approved By :S.P. Date : 11th June 2015Drawing No. :
EOQBAL_EXFCD_C1_SH10Map Series : Page 10 of 12
Drawing Scale : 1:5,000 @A3
For
insp
ectio
n pur
pose
s only
.
Conse
nt of
copy
right
owne
r req
uired
for a
ny ot
her u
se.
EPA Export 18-05-2017:03:05:01