auto perimetry
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
INTERPRETATION OFAUTOMATED PERIMETRY
![Page 2: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© Thomas R
Automated perimetry
![Page 3: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© Thomas R
Automated perimetry
I. Perimetry logicII. Identifying field defectsIII. Criteria for glaucomatous defectsIV. Detecting glaucomatous progressionV. Advanced field defects
![Page 4: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© Thomas R
Bracketing strategy
B
A
![Page 5: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© Thomas R
Normal thresholds
• Mean threshold in disease-free fields• In a given age group• At a given location in the visual field• Mean normal values are stored in the
automated perimeter and comparedagainst patient data
![Page 6: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© Thomas R
Computers and ease ofinterpretation
Sensitivity
+Simple set of rules
Computer
Diagnosis
![Page 7: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© Thomas R
Perimeter logic (1)
• Sensitivity determined at each location• Normal range developed• Normal range is arbitrary
– Includes the values of 95% of thenormal population
![Page 8: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© Thomas R
Perimeter logic (2)
• ‘Abnormal’ values include the lowest5% of those in normal individuals
• Therefore, 5% of normal individualswill be labelled abnormal
‘Abnormal’ is not the sameas diseased
![Page 9: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© Thomas R
Perimeter logic (3)
• General population – 100 tested• 1% glaucoma; 99% normal• Six will have abnormal tests:
• 1 glaucoma patient• 5 normal individuals
![Page 10: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© Thomas R
Perimeter logic (4)
• Clinic population – 100 tested• 30% glaucoma; 70% normal• 33 will have abnormal tests
• 30 glaucoma patients• 3 normal individuals
![Page 11: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© Thomas R
Interpretation is not child’s play
Automated perimeters still need interpretation
![Page 12: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© Thomas R
Before interpretation …
… a few principles
![Page 13: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
© Thomas R
Rely on threshold tests
• First real evidence of glaucoma• Detect scotoma• Detect depression of the ‘hill’ of vision• May predict visual loss
![Page 14: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
© Thomas R
Screening tests
• Screening
• Fishing
• Fatigue
![Page 15: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
© Thomas R
Interpreting decibel values isjust half the challenge …
• False positives• False negatives• Fixation• Fluctuation
• Strategy• Experience• Technicians• Artefacts
![Page 16: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 17: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
© Thomas R
Optimising patient performance
• Choose the most appropriate investigation– Test pattern and strategy
• Ensure the patient is comfortably positioned– Support feet, back and arms– Adjust chin rest– Cover the other eye fully
• Provide careful instructions prior to the test• Support the patient during the test• Give feedback on test performance
SEAGIG. Asia Pacific Glaucoma Guidelines. 2003–2004.
![Page 18: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
© Thomas R
A word about the grey scale
• Never use the grey scale alone forinterpretation
• It is useful to educate the patientand to identify false-positiveand false-negative errors
![Page 19: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
‘White’ scotomas associatedwith false positives
© Thomas R
![Page 20: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 21: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
‘Clover leaf’ pattern associatedwith false negatives
© Thomas R
![Page 22: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
© Thomas R
Using the grey scale
• To educate the patient• White scotomas with false positives• Clover leaf pattern with false negatives• Never interpret using the grey scale alone
![Page 23: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
© Thomas R
Questions
• Is there a field defect?• Is it due to glaucoma?• Is the defect progressing?
![Page 24: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
© Thomas R
Is the field abnormal?
• Without obvious defects, it is difficultto make a decision based on thefirst field
• Repeat examinations providedefinitive information
• Never make a diagnosis based onthe visual field alone
![Page 25: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Interpret the fieldsystematically usingzones 1–8
© Thomas R
![Page 26: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
2
© Thomas R
AGE 57 2
FIXATION LOSSES 0/24
FALSE POS ERRORS 0/14
FALSE NEG ERRORS 1/13
QUESTIONS ASKED 449
FOVEA: 33 DB
TEST TIME 13:59
![Page 27: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
• Just glance at thegrey scale and moveon to zones 4 & 5
• Never interpret usingthe grey scale alone
3
© Thomas R
![Page 28: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
© Thomas R
• Point-by-point difference from theexpected value for age-relatednormal individuals
• Reveals generalised depression
• Cannot confirm a scotoma
• Look at the number and patternof symbols
Zone 4: total deviation
![Page 29: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
© Thomas R
180° 0°
40 dB
0
30
20
10
90 60 30 0 30 60 90
Normal ‘hill’ of vision
![Page 30: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
© Thomas R
180° 0°
40 dB
0
30
20
10
90 60 30 0 30 60 90
Generalised depression
![Page 31: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
© Thomas R
180° 0°
40 dB
0
30
20
10
90 60 30 0 30 60 90
Generalised depression with‘hidden’ localised scotoma
![Page 32: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
© Thomas R
180° 0°
40 dB
0
30
20
10
90 60 30 0 30 60 90
Pattern deviation plot: scotoma revealedafter adjusting for generalised depression
![Page 33: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
© Thomas R
• Reveals focal defectsafter adjusting foroverall depression(or elevation) of thehill of vision
• Confirms a scotoma::
::
Zone 5: pattern deviation
![Page 34: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Examples of total and patterndeviation plots in different situations
![Page 35: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
© Thomas R
Normal ‘hill’ of vision
![Page 36: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
© Thomas R
‘Normal’ hill of vision withlocalised scotoma
SEAGIG. Asia Pacific Glaucoma Guidelines. 2003–2004.
180° 0°
40 dB
0
30
20
10
90 60 30 0 30 60 90
‘Normal’ hill of vision with localised scotoma
![Page 37: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
© Thomas R
Generalised depression with‘hidden’ localised scotoma
![Page 38: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
© Thomas R
Generalised depression
![Page 39: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 40: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
© Thomas R
MD –2.18 dBPSD 4.63 dB; p < 1%SF 1.24 dBCPSD 4.44 dB; p < 0.5%
• All the informationfrom all the pointstested is reduced tosingle numbers
Global indices
MD, mean deviation; PSD, pattern standard deviation; SF, short-term fluctuation;CPSD, corrected PSD.
![Page 41: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
• Both MD and PSDare derived from thetotal deviation plot
• However, theyprovide differenttypes of information
© Thomas R
![Page 42: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
© Thomas R
• Average of all the numbersin the total deviation plot
• Indicates overall deviationof the visual field fromnormal
• Positive numbers indicatean ‘elevated’ field
• Negative numbers indicatea ‘depressed’ field
Global indices: mean deviation (1)
MD –2.18 dBPSD 4.63 dB; p < 1%SF 1.24 dBCPSD 4.44 dB; p < 0.5%
![Page 43: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
© Thomas R
• Provides similarinformation to totaldeviation
• Cannot confirm thepresence of a scotoma
Global indices: mean deviation (2)
MD –2.18 dBPSD 4.63 dB; p < 1%SF 1.24 dBCPSD 4.44 dB; p < 0.5%
![Page 44: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
© Thomas R
• Also derived from thetotal deviation plot
• Indicates the degreeto which the numbersdiffer from each other
• Highlights ‘roughness’or ‘pot-holes’ in the hillof vision
Global indices:pattern standard deviation (1)
MD –2.18 dBPSD 4.63 dB; p < 1%SF 1.24 dBCPSD 4.44 dB; p < 0.5%
![Page 45: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
© Thomas R
Global indices:pattern standard deviation (2)
MD –2.18 dBPSD 4.63 dB; p < 1%SF 1.24 dBCPSD 4.44 dB; p < 0.5%
• Provides similarinformation to thepattern deviation
• Calls attention toscotomas
![Page 46: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
© Thomas R
28
28 29 33 32 32
32
30
30
33
32
29 31
28
30
29
29
29
21
26
2728293332
31
24
29
31
30
2928
26
29
29
27
26
26
25
28 29 32 32 32
32
29
30
32
31
29 31
25
28
29
25
20
27
26
272803434
32
29
32
33
30
3032
25
27
29
28
23
29
(31)
(32)
(32) (30)
(31)
(30)
(33)
(30) (31)
(33)
• Intra-test error inthreshold determination
• Standard deviation of10 predeterminedpoints that are eachtested twice
Global indices:short-term fluctuation
![Page 47: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
© Thomas R
Global indices: correctedpattern standard deviation
• CPSD is PSD corrected for the SF– If SF is due to unreliability,
then CPSD is better– If SF is due to pathology,
then PSD is better
![Page 48: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
© Thomas R
MDTotal deviation plot
PSDPatterndeviation plot
Generalised depressionCan suspect a scotoma
Review of key points
Local irregularityConfirms scotoma
![Page 49: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Glaucoma Hemifield Test
© Thomas R
![Page 50: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
© Thomas R
Zone 7: Glaucoma Hemifield Test
44 5
32
1
![Page 51: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
© Thomas RGHT, Glaucoma Hemifield Test.
![Page 52: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 53: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
8
© Thomas R
![Page 54: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
• Never rely on thegrey scale alone tomake a diagnosis
• Never rely on thevisual field alone tomake a diagnosis
• Always correlatewith the clinicalfindings
© Thomas R
![Page 55: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
© Thomas R
Questions
Is there a field defect?• Is it due to glaucoma?• Is the defect progressing?
![Page 56: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
© Thomas R
Glaucomatous defects
• Characteristics of glaucomatous defects:– Asymmetrical across the horizontal midline*– Located in the mid-periphery*
(5–25 degrees from fixation)– Reproducible– Not attributable to other pathology– Localised– Correlating with the appearance of the optic disc
and neighbouring areas
* Applicable to early/moderate cases.SEAGIG. Asia Pacific Glaucoma Guidelines. 2003–2004.
![Page 57: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
© Thomas R
Criteria for glaucomatousdefects (1)
Pattern deviation plot• ≥ 3 non-edge points
with p < 5%• One point with p < 1%• Cluster in arcuate area
![Page 58: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
© Thomas R
Criteria for glaucomatousdefects (2)
CPSD or PSDdepressedwith p < 5%
![Page 59: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
© Thomas R
Criteria for glaucomatousdefects (3)
Abnormal GHT
![Page 60: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
© Thomas R
Three criteria for glaucomatousdefects*
1. Pattern deviation plot– ≥ 3 non-edge points
with p < 5%– One point with p < 1%– Cluster in arcuate area
2. CPSD or PSDdepressed with p < 5%
3. Abnormal GHT
*Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd Edn. St Louis: Mosby, 1999.
![Page 61: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
• Try interpretingthis visual field,going fromzones 1–8
© Thomas R
![Page 62: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
2
2
Visual acuity should correlatewith the foveal threshold
© Thomas R
![Page 63: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
• Continueinterpretingthis visual field:zones 3–8
• Remember:no more than aglance at thegrey scale
© Thomas R
![Page 64: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
© Thomas R
Revision: typical cataract
![Page 65: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
© Thomas R
Revision: typical glaucoma
![Page 66: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
© Thomas R
Revision: glaucoma and cataract
![Page 67: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
© Thomas R
Does this patient haveglaucoma? (1)
Only if the defects are repeatable and correlate with disc and clinical findings
![Page 68: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
© Thomas R
Does this patient haveglaucoma? (2)
Only if the defects are repeatable and correlate with disc and clinical findings
![Page 69: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
© Thomas R
Questions
Is there a field defect?Is it due to glaucoma?• Is the defect progressing?
![Page 70: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
© Thomas R
Principle
• Is there a field defect?• Is it due to glaucoma?• Is the defect progressing?
– Compare to selected baseline– Discard learning fields from baseline– Recognise ‘false’ progression
![Page 71: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
© Thomas R
False progression
• Learning curve• Long-term fluctuation• Artefacts• Patient factors• Pupil size
![Page 72: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Pupil: 1 mm
© Thomas R
![Page 73: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Pupil: 2.5 mm
© Thomas R
![Page 74: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
© Thomas R
Detecting change
• Change analysis – box plot• Overview programme• Glaucoma progression analysis™
(GPA™)
1. Select appropriate baseline2. Discard learning fields from baseline
![Page 75: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
© Thomas R
Overview programme
• Sequential series of fields for the samepatient over a period of time
• Has all the single field information,including total and pattern deviation plots
• Tells us at a glance what is happeningand allows us to deduce WHY it ishappening
![Page 76: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Fluctuation over time
© Thomas R
![Page 77: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Overview: the patient developed a cataract, which wasextracted. Note that the pattern deviation plot remains clear.
© Thomas R
![Page 78: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Overview: glaucoma is progressing. Both the total and patterndeviation plots show worsening.
© Thomas R
![Page 79: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
© Thomas R
Overviewprogramme showsprogression
Full threshold
SITA standard
SITA, Swedish InteractiveThreshold Algorithm.
![Page 80: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
© Thomas R
Overviewprogramme showsprogression
• SITA is differentfrom full threshold
• Can't compareapples to oranges
• Fields may fluctuate
![Page 81: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
© Thomas R
Glaucoma Progression Analysis™*
• GPA™ is now in clinical use
• Change is based on the pattern deviation plot
• Compatible with both SITA and full threshold(baseline only)
*Carl Zeiss Meditec.
![Page 82: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 83: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
GPA™Right eye:baseline
© Thomas R
GPATM, Glaucoma ProgressionAnalysisTM.
![Page 84: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
GPA™Right eye:follow-up
© Thomas R
GPATM, Glaucoma ProgressionAnalysisTM.
![Page 85: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
© Thomas R
3 or more points deteriorate in at least 2 consecutive tests
© Thomas R
![Page 86: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
3 or more points deteriorate in at least 3 consecutive tests
© Thomas R
![Page 87: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
GPA™Left eye:baseline
© Thomas R
GPATM, Glaucoma ProgressionAnalysisTM.
![Page 88: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
GPA™Left eye:follow-up
© Thomas R
GPATM, GlaucomaProgressionAnalysisTM.
![Page 89: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
© Thomas R
![Page 90: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
© Thomas R
Diagnosis of visual fieldprogression
• Different for research purposes– Set criteria in isolation
• Clinical follow-up scenario– Other criteria (IOP, disc changes) to consider– A corresponding repeatable change is sufficient– If in doubt, REPEAT
• Baseline fields are not constant– Select accordingly
![Page 91: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Don’t forget to discard‘learning’ fields frombaseline
© Thomas R
![Page 92: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
© Thomas R
Follow-up of advancedfield defects
![Page 93: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Advanced field defect
Why is the patterndeviation plot notshowing a defect?
© Thomas R
![Page 94: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Not enough points withsensitivity to produce thepattern deviation plot
© Thomas R
![Page 95: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Follow-up with a 10–2 programme –now there are enough sensitive pointsto produce a pattern deviation plot
© Thomas R
![Page 96: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Advanced defectand/or low sensitivities –follow-up with a size Vtarget
Disadvantage: we losestatistical help forinterpreting the total andpattern deviation plots
© Thomas R
![Page 97: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
© Thomas R
More advanced defects: followwith macular programme
![Page 98: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Macular programme inadvanced glaucoma
© Thomas R
![Page 99: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Size V target: macular splitMacular split (0 dB) next to the foveawith a size V target may predict ‘wipe out’
© Thomas R
![Page 100: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
© Thomas R
Recent developments: SITA
• Asks smart questions• Gold standard• More abnormal points on pattern
deviation• Shallower defects• Significant because of less variability
![Page 101: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
SITA is interpreted inthe same 8 zones aspreviously described
© Thomas R
SITA, Swedish InteractiveThreshold Algorithm.
![Page 102: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
SITA uses the samecriteria to identify aglaucomatous fielddefect
© Thomas R
SITA, Swedish InteractiveThreshold Algorithm.
![Page 103: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Applying the skills
Does this field fulfilthe criteria for aglaucomatous defect?
Does this patienthave glaucoma?
© Thomas R
![Page 104: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Not unless the fielddefect correlates withclinical findings
Never diagnosebased on the visualfield ALONE
© Thomas R
![Page 105: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
© Thomas R
Automated perimetry: warning
Sophisticated techniques and elaboratedata printouts should not seduce us intoa false sense of security or a misplacedbelief in the validity or reliability ofautomated perimetry*
*Zalta AH. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 1302–11.
![Page 106: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
INTERPRETATION OFOCTOPUS FIELDS
![Page 107: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
© Thomas R
Test parameters – Octopus vs.HFA
4–2 dB bracketingstrategy
SITA standardSITA fast
4–2–1 dB bracketingstrategy
DynamicTendency oriented
perimetry (TOP)
Test strategies
0–40 dB0–40 dBMeasuring range
Goldmann I–V200 ms10,000 asb
Goldmann III and V100 ms4800 asb
Stimulus sizeStimulus durationLuminance for 0 dB
10 cd/m2 (31.5 asb)10 cd/m2 (31.4 asb)Background luminance
Aspherical bowlDirect projectionBowl type
HFA 700 seriesOctopus 300Parameter
Fankhauser F et al. Automated Perimetry: Visual Field Digest. 5th Edn. Köniz: Haag-Streit AG, 2004.
![Page 108: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
[[Credit line to be added]]
Probabilityplots
Comparisontables
Grey scale
Patient dataand refraction
Strategy andtest parameters
Actual values
Bebie (defect)curve
Deviation
Global indices
RP: permissionrequested
![Page 109: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
© Thomas R
Octopus global indices
• MS Mean sensitivity– Average of all measured values
• MD Mean defect – Average of all values corrected for age
• LV Loss variance – Equivalent to PSD
• SF Short-term fluctuation• CLV ‘Corrected’ loss variance
– Equivalent to corrected PSD• RF Reliability factor
![Page 110: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
© Thomas R
Is the visual field abnormal?
• Octopus criteria for a visual field defect1– MD greater than 2 dB– LV greater than 6 dB– At least 7 points with sensitivity decreased
by ≥ 5 dB, three of them being contiguous• How do these compare to HFA criteria?
1. Morales J et al. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 134–42.
![Page 111: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
© Thomas R
HFA criteria for glaucomatousdefects*
1. Pattern deviation plot– ≥ 3 non-edge points
with p < 5%– One point with p < 1%– Cluster in arcuate area
2. CPSD or PSDdepressed with p < 5%
3. Abnormal GHT
*Anderson DR, Patella VM. Automated Static Perimetry. 2nd Edn. St Louis: Mosby, 1999.
![Page 112: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Comparison of Octopus andHFA fields from a single patient
© Sihota R
![Page 113: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
© Thomas R
Patient data, strategy and testparameters
© Sihota R
![Page 114: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
© Sihota R
Grey scale
![Page 115: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
© Thomas R© Sihota R
Octopus: comparison tables
Phase I Phase 2 Mean# 59 59 59MS 21.8 18.6 20.2MD 6.8 10.1 8.5LV 46.6 73.2 51.0CLV 42.2SF 4.9RF 3.1
![Page 116: Auto perimetry](https://reader037.vdocument.in/reader037/viewer/2022102815/554b3d03b4c9054b5e8b4620/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
© Thomas R© Sihota R
GHT Outside normal limitsMD –7.58 dB; p < 0.5%PSD 6.30 dB; p < 2%SF 2.27 dB; p < 10%CPSD 5.75 dB; p < 1%
HFA: total and pattern deviation