backlog nsr and results data quality assurance monitoring land based investment strategy (lbis):...

Backlog NSR and RESULTS Data Quality Assurance

Monitoring

Land Based Investment Strategy (LBIS):

Current Reforestation Planning and Delivery Workshop

September 18, 2013

Richmond, BC

Matt Leroy

Caroline MacLeodResource Practices Branch

2

Goals and Objectives

• Backlog NSR Updates• Data Requirement and RISS

» Current published RISS-gf and upcoming changes (Wildfire, Carbon)

• Data Quality» FFT Submissions » Caribou GAR Planning» Gaps – How do we make data quality a priority

• Training

2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012 2012/2013 2013/20140

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

160

180

200

Outstanding backlog NSR hectares, Provincial Rollup

outstanding backlog hectares

Fiscal Year

Th

ou

san

ds

of

Hec

tare

s

100

Mile

Hou

se T

SA

Arrow/B

ound

ary

TSA

Arrowsm

ith/S

trath

cona

TSA

Bulkley

TSA

Cassia

r/Kisp

iox/B

ulkley

TSA

Dawso

n Cre

ek T

SA

Fort S

t. Jo

hn T

SA

Frase

r TSA

Golden

/Rev

elsto

ke T

SA

Inve

rmer

e/Cra

nbro

ok T

SA

Kalum

/Nas

s TSA

Kingco

me

TSA

Koote

nay

Lake

TSA

Lilloo

et T

SA

Mer

ritt T

SA

Mid

Coast

TSA

Mor

ice/L

akes

TSA

North

Coa

st T

SA

Peace

TSA

Quesn

el TSA

Robso

n Vall

ey T

SA

Soo T

SA

Willi

ams

Lake

TSA

Willi

ams

Lake

TSA (w

est p

art)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Outsanding backlog NSR hectares by TSA

outsanding hectares

5

Data Quality Assurance MonitoringData Quality Assurance Monitoring

DABDCH

DCODCS

DHWDKA

DKMDM

KDNI

DPCDQC

DRMDSI

DSSRSI

0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

8000

FFT or FIA Funded Activities - Reporting Review 2013

Sum of 9-Data OK

Sum of 8-Openings No Plnd No Actual

Sum of 7-Planned Activities with No Completed Activivities

Sum of 6-No OP Spatial

Sum of 5-No InterAgency No

Sum of 4-FE No Map

Sum of 3-Field Base Treatement No SU

Sum of 2-FC Update No FC Map

Sum of 1-No FC Update

Activity or Update Fiscal Year

Nu

mb

er o

f A

ctiv

itie

s/R

eco

rds

6


DABDCH

DCODCS

DHWDKA

DKMDM

KDNI

DPCDQC

DRMDSI

DSSRSI

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FFT or FIA Funded Activities - Reporting Review 2013Sum of 9-Data OK





Sum of 4-FE No Map




Activity or Update Fiscal Year

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f A

ctiv

itie

s (%

)

7


2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (blank)0

1000

2000

3000

4000

5000

6000

7000

FFT and FIA Funded Activities - Reporting Review 2013

Sum of 9-Data OK





Sum of 4-FE No Map




Activity/Update Fiscal Year

Nu

mb

er o

f A

ctiv

ity/

Rec

ord

s

8


2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 (blank)0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

FFT and FIA Funded Activities - Reporting Review 2013

Sum of 9-Data OK





Sum of 4-FE No Map




Activity/Update Fiscal Year

Pro

po

rtio

n o

f A

ctiv

ity/

Rec

ord

s (%

)

9

RESULTS – Caribou GARRESULTS – Caribou GAR

DCC DCO DHO DMH DQU DWL0

5

10

15

20

25

30

GAR Openings with No Planned Activities

Nu

nb

er o

f O

pen

ing

s

Data Quality - Gaps?

Issue 1 Missing FC

Update

Issue 2 FC Up-date w/o Spatial

Issue 3 Missing Stocking

Standards

Issue 4 FE

w/o Activity Spatial

Issue 5 Incorrect DN, JS

Shell Open-ings

Issue 6 No

Opening Sp.

Issue 7 JS

w/o Activity Spatial

Issue 8 FE

with Opening

Sp.

Issue 9 In-correct FE

or JS Shells

Issue 10

New Open-ing Re-

quired for PL

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

Review of FTM and FTL Reporting - Issues Identified Comparison of two periods: Jan 1, 2011 to Feb 4, 2013 and Jan 1, 2011 and Sept 4, 2013

Jan 1, 2011 to Feb 4, 2013 % Issues

Jan 1, 2011 to Sept 4, 2013 % Issues

Issue Type

Prop

orti

on o

f Pop

ulati

on w

ith

Issu

es (%

)


0.0%

2.5%

5.0%

7.5%

10.0%

12.5%

15.0%

17.5%

20.0%

22.5%

25.0%

27.5%

30.0%

148

16242

90

27

255

43110

21

9

All Identified Issues in FTM and FTL - Funded Activities

Sept, 2013 % Change Since Feb 4, 2013

% S

ub

mit

ted

Ac

tiv

itie

s w

ith

Iss

ue

s

“There are currently no incentives to improve the data quality”

How do we make data quality a priority?

District Funding Responsibility Continuous Improvement – Training/Communication Report Cards


13

RESULTS Training

• New Training Software (Go To Training);

• Core Modules Updates and Delivery;

• Existing training material and recorded sessions and future recordings;

• Customized sessions.

14

Summary

• Need for better data• Need for complete planning activities in RESULTS• Need for continuous training

backlog nsr and results data quality assurance monitoring land based investment strategy (lbis):...

Documents