basic rgb - data#3 · increase in pbba capacity by 2015 of it budgets go to maintenance of old...

1
traditional backup vs next gen backup traditional backup vs next gen backup forces of transformation forces of transformation EMC 2 , EMC, and the EMC logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of EMC Corporation in the United States and other countries. © Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved. market direction market direction How changes in the way we produce, manage, and store information are transforming backup & recovery procedures and speeding the adoption of the Purpose-Built Backup Appliance, or PBBA. VIRTUALIZATION BUDGET & RESOURCE PRESSURE BUDGET & RESOURCE PRESSURE DATA GROWTH VIRTUALIZATION DATA GROWTH Data growth in this decade IT staffing expected to increase by only 47% A rapid move from physical to virtual machines To learn more, visit www.emc.com/Backup To learn more, visit www.emc.com/Backup 30 % ORGANIZATIONS WANT TO REDUCE COST REDUCE COMPLEXITY INCREASE CAPABILITY » » » 46 % MARKET MOVING AWAY FROM TAPE INCREASE IN PBBA CAPACITY BY 2015 of IT budgets go to maintenance of old systems 73 % EMC LEADS THE PBBA MARKET MOST TRUSTED VENDOR CHANGE VENDORS IDC White Paper: “Generating Proven Business Value with EMC Next-Generation Backup and Recovery,” sponsored by EMC, October 2011 IDC Market Analysis Perspective: Worldwide Enterprise Virtualization Software, December 2011 Gartner Research:”The Future of Backup May Not Be Backup”, ID Number: G00218917, September 2011 The InfoPro Research Paper: “Deduplication: A Paradigm Shift in Backup”, Wave 14 Update, January 2011 European Disaster Recovery Survey 2011: “Data Today Gone Tomorrow: How Well Companies Are Poised For IT Recovery”, sponsored by EMC, November 2011 IDC Worldwide Purpose-Built Backup Appliance 2011–2015 Forecast Update, December 2011 Forrester Research, Inc., IT Budget Allocations: Planning For 2011, December 2010 ESG White Paper, "What EMC is Doing to Backup", January 2011 IDC iView "Extracting Value from Chaos," June 2011 sources: recovery efficiency agility of backups fail to complete within allotted time of recoveries are unsuccessful Fear they could not recover from a disaster Faster VMware restores 30 x 30 x Less WAN bandwidth required 99 % 99 % 20 % 20 % 32 % 32 % 74 % 74 % Higher media management costs $ Month payback on investment Tape = slow, costly, & cumbersome process Single solution for physical & virtual backup speeds IT transformation Poor virtualization support slows IT transformation More storage consumed for backup than production 10 x 10 x Smaller backup windows 90 % 90 % Simple, one-step recovery spares staff time and resources step step Less time spent managing backups 80 % 80 % Reduction in backup storage requirements 30 x 30 x Disk = Greater protection and recovery of Data Protection budget goes toward operating costs 58 % 58 %

Upload: doannga

Post on 02-Apr-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

traditional backup vs next gen backuptraditional backup vs next gen backup

forces of transformationforces of transformation

EMC2, EMC, and the EMC logo are registered trademarks or trademarks of EMC Corporation in the United States and other countries. © Copyright 2012 EMC Corporation. All rights reserved.

market directionmarket direction

How changes in the way we produce, manage, and store information are transforming backup & recovery procedures and speeding the adoption of the Purpose-Built Backup Appliance, or PBBA.

VIRTUALIZATION BUDGET & RESOURCE PRESSUREBUDGET & RESOURCE PRESSUREDATA GROWTH VIRTUALIZATIONDATA GROWTH

Data growth in this decadeIT staffing expected to increase by only 47%

A rapid move from physical to virtual machines

To learn more, visit www.emc.com/BackupTo learn more, visit www.emc.com/Backup

30%ORGANIZATIONS WANT TO

REDUCE COSTREDUCE COMPLEXITYINCREASE CAPABILITY

»»»

46%

MARKET MOVING AWAY FROM TAPE

INCREASE IN PBBA CAPACITY BY 2015

of IT budgets go to maintenance of old systems73%

EMC LEADS THE PBBA MARKET

MOST TRUSTED VENDOR

CHANGE VENDORS

IDC White Paper: “Generating Proven Business Value with EMC Next-Generation Backup and Recovery,” sponsored by EMC, October 2011IDC Market Analysis Perspective: Worldwide Enterprise Virtualization Software, December 2011Gartner Research:”The Future of Backup May Not Be Backup”, ID Number: G00218917, September 2011The InfoPro Research Paper: “Deduplication: A Paradigm Shift in Backup”, Wave 14 Update, January 2011European Disaster Recovery Survey 2011: “Data Today Gone Tomorrow: How Well Companies Are Poised For IT Recovery”, sponsored by EMC, November 2011IDC Worldwide Purpose-Built Backup Appliance 2011–2015 Forecast Update, December 2011Forrester Research, Inc., IT Budget Allocations: Planning For 2011, December 2010

ESG White Paper, "What EMC is Doing to Backup", January 2011IDC iView "Extracting Value from Chaos," June 2011

sources:

r e cove ry

e f f ic i e nc y

ag i l ity

of backups fail to complete within allotted time

of recoveries are unsuccessful

Fear they could not recover from a disaster

Faster VMware restores 30x30x

Less WAN bandwidth required99%99%

20%20%

32%32%

74%74%

Higher media management costs$

Month payback on investment

Tape = slow, costly, & cumbersome process

Single solution for physical & virtual backup speeds IT transformation

Poor virtualization support slows IT transformation

More storage consumed for backup than production10x10x

Smaller backup windows90%90%

Simple, one-step recovery spares staff time and resourcesstepstep

Less time spent managing backups80%80%

Reduction in backup storage requirements30x30x

Disk = Greater protection and recovery

of Data Protection budget goes toward operating costs58%58%