beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel chambers in

19
November 2010 Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium Ralf-Peter Kapsch 1 , Igor Gomola 2 1 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany 2 IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany [email protected] Beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel chambers in photon beams Beam quality correction factors for plane-parallel chambers in photon beams

Upload: others

Post on 03-Feb-2022

5 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Ralf-Peter Kapsch1, Igor Gomola2

1 Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig, Germany2 IBA Dosimetry, Schwarzenbruck, Germany

[email protected]

Beam quality correction factors forplane-parallel chambers in photon beams

Beam quality correction factors forplane-parallel chambers in photon beams

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Introduction

, ,w Q Q D w QD M N k=

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

The beam quality correction factor kQ

• Cylindrical chambers:– Chamber type specific values

IAEA TRS-398

AAPM TG-51

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

The beam quality correction factor kQ

• Plane-parallel chambers:– No tabulated values

• Reason:

“Note that plane-parallel chambers are not included becausethere is insufficient information about wall correction factorsin photon beams other than 60Co.”

TG-51 (1999), Sec. IX B

“…, the lack of data for the wall correction factor pwall forplane-parallel chambers in high energy photon beams …makes these chambers inappropriate.“

TRS-398 (2000), Footnote 23

“For plane-parallel chamber types, pwall is problematic and variationsof up to 3% between chambers of the same type have been reported …“

TRS-398 (2000), II.2.3.3.

“A major problem with the use of … pwall for commercial plane parallelchambers is the finding, reported by several groups, that chambersof the same design can yield significantly different results …“

TRS-381 (1997), C.2.1.

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Experimental determination of kQ

IBA PPC05 IBA PPC40

# 83, 111, 156, 157, 158, 159, 160, 161, 474, 475 # 342, 344, 507, 509, 510, 512, 808, 809, 810, 811

Reference:NE2561 #244 pp p ref repp f

,fp re

,QQ D w D w QQkM M N kN =

ref ref

pref,p

p pp

p,

QQ

Q

D w

DQ

w

M Nk

M Nk =

Method:

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Step 1: Calibration in 60Co

refrefpp re

p,p,

fpp

QQ

D wQ

DQ w

Mk k

MNN

=

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.54

0.55

0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.60

0.61

0.62 Calibration in 2009 Calibration in 2005

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/nC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

or

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.54

0.55

0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.60

0.61

0.62 Calibration in 2009 Calibration in 2005

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/nC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

orPPC05

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Step 2: Calibration in high-energy photon beams

4 MV8 MV

25 MV

SSD: 100 cmFS: 10 cm ×

10 cm

z: 10 cm

refpp ref,

f

,

r

pp p

e

pD w

QQ

QD

Q

w

MM

Nk k

N=

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55-2.0 %

-1.5 %

-1.0 %

-0.5 %

0.0 %

0.5 %

rela

tive

varia

tion

of I

PP

C05

/ I m

onito

r

Time since beginning of measurement

U = +100 V U = -100 V

min

PPC05-83, 25 MV

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55-2.0 %

-1.5 %

-1.0 %

-0.5 %

0.0 %

0.5 %

rela

tive

varia

tion

of I

PP

C05

/ I m

onito

r

Time since beginning of measurement

U = +100 V U = -100 V

min

PPC05-83, 25 MV

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Step 3: Calculation of kQ

ref refpp ,

pref

p pp,

Q D wQ Q

Q D w

M Nk

M Nk=

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Step 3: Calculation of kQ

ref refpp ,

pref

p pp,

Q D wQ Q

Q D w

M Nk

M Nk=

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Results

83 111 156 157 158 159 160 161 474 4750.93

0.94

0.95

0.96

0.97

0.98

0.99

1.00

25 MV

8 MV

kQ

Serial number of chamber

4 MV

PPC05

4 MV 8 MV 25 MV

Relative span 0.51 % 0.64 % 0.65 %

Relative std. dev. 0.19 % 0.22 % 0.18 %

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

342 344 507 509 510 512 808 809 810 8110.93

0.94

0.95

0.96

0.97

0.98

0.99

1.00

25 MV

8 MV

Serial number of chamber

kQ

4 MV

Results

PPC40

4 MV 8 MV 25 MV

Relative span 0.59 % 0.43 % 0.70 %

Relative std. dev. 0.17 % 0.16 % 0.25 %

M.R. McEwen, S. Duane, R.A.S. Thomas,IAEA-Symposium 2002:

• 3 Roos chambers, 6 MV … 19 MV ΔkQ ≈

0.8 %

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Estimation of uncertaintyref ref

,pp refpp pp

,

Q D wQ Q

Q D w

M Nk k

M N=

Quantityref,pp,

D w

D w

NN

ref

ppQ

Q

MM

refQk

Std. uncertainty

0.21 %

0.14 %

1.0 %(IAEA TRS-398)

0.26 %

1.04 %

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Summary and Conclusion

Here:

variations of less than 0.7 %Here:

variations of less than 0.7 %

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Thank You!

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Calibration factors of the plane-parallel chambers

PPC05

PPC40

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.54

0.55

0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.60

0.61

0.62 Calibration in 2009 Calibration in 2005

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/nC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

or

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.54

0.55

0.56

0.57

0.58

0.59

0.60

0.61

0.62 Calibration in 2009 Calibration in 2005

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/nC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

or

342

344

507

509

510

512

808

809

810

811

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/µC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

or

342

344

507

509

510

512

808

809

810

811

80

82

84

86

88

90

92

serial number of chamber

calib

ratio

n fa

ctor

ND

,w

Gy/µC

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

rela

tive

chan

ge o

f cal

ibra

tion

fact

or

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Polarity effect of the plane-parallel chambers

PPC05

PPC40

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.994

0.995

0.996

0.997

0.998

0.999

1.000

1.001

1.002

1.003

60Co 25 MV

k pol

serial number of chamber

83 111

156

157

158

159

160

161

474

475

0.994

0.995

0.996

0.997

0.998

0.999

1.000

1.001

1.002

1.003

60Co 25 MV

k pol

serial number of chamber

342

344

507

509

510

512

808

809

810

811

0.9995

1.0000

1.0005

1.0010

1.0015

60Co 8 MV

k pol

serial number of chamber

342

344

507

509

510

512

808

809

810

811

0.9995

1.0000

1.0005

1.0010

1.0015

60Co 8 MV

k pol

serial number of chamber

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

External monitor chamber

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

Performance of the external monitor chamber

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110

0.0 %

0.2 %

0.4 %

0.6 %

0.8 %re

lativ

e de

viat

ion

of th

e ra

tio o

f det

ecto

r sig

nals

time since beginning of measurementmin

FC65-G / internal monitor of linac

FC65-G / improved monitor

Kapsch, R.-P., Krauss, A.,World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringIFMBE Proc. 25/I (2009), 85-88

Kapsch, R.-P., Krauss, A.,World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical EngineeringIFMBE Proc. 25/I (2009), 85-88

November 2010Ralf-Peter Kapsch (PTB) IAEA Symposium

kQ for cylindrical chambers

PTW 30013 PTW 31013

2938 2939 2940 2941 2942 2943 2944 2945 2946 29480.955

0.960

0.965

0.970

0.975

0.980

0.985

k Q

Serial number

8 MV 16 MV

0.9628

0.9794

1191 1192 1193 1194 1195 1196 1197 1198 1199 12000.955

0.960

0.965

0.970

0.975

0.980

0.985

k Q

Serial number

8 MV 16 MV

0.9629

0.9777