bell high school performance dialogue
DESCRIPTION
BELL HIGH SCHOOL Performance Dialogue. CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and Performance Meter Progress Report PLC Meeting August 27, 2013. B H S. Objectives. Review the results of the 2013 CST results: What does the data show for our school, our department, our PLC? - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
BELL HIGH BELL HIGH SCHOOL SCHOOL
Performance Performance DialogueDialogue
CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and CST, CAHSEE, QEIA, and Performance Meter Progress Performance Meter Progress
ReportReportPLC MeetingPLC Meeting
August 27, 2013August 27, 2013
Objectives
• Review the results of the 2013 CST results:• What does the data show for our school, our department, our PLC?• What are the obvious patterns among the data?• What are the trends or commonalities?• Describe the range of data. What are the high (s), low (s) and average (s)?
• Dialogue on classroom implications
• Analyze CST results and prior year CSTs and PAs to date
• Use strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps
2
BHS
Performance Management Cycle
3
School Vision, Goals, and Core Beliefs
BHS
Strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps
4
BHS
Key Instructional Strategies
• What have been your key strategies (action steps) to increasing math, ELA, science and social studies achievement?
• How might you describe the level of implementation around those? Who is doing it and how often? How effectively?
• What challenges, if any, have you experienced during implementation?
5
BHS
English Language ArtsCA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.
2013 %Adv. & Prof.
% DIFFAdv. & Prof.
2012 %FBB &
BB
2013 %FBB &
BB
% DIFFFBB &
BB
English 9
34 39 +5 29 25 -4
English 10
32 38 +6 28 25 -3
English 11
38 38 0 26 21 -5
English Total
34 38 +4 28 24 -4
BHS
English Language ArtsCA Standards Test Four Year Trend
BHS
English Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model
2012CST
PA 1Adv/Prof
PA 1Participation
Rate
PA 2Adv/Prof
PA 2Participation
Rate
PA 3Adv/Prof
PA 3Participation
Rate
2013CST
ELA 9 34% 36% 96.6% 23% 83.3% 31% 95% 39%
ELA 10 32% 49% 98.1% 33% 84.6% 43% 95% 38%
BHS
English Language ArtsCAHSEE Census
Two Year Comparison
English ELA % Passing
ELA % Proficient
2013Total
72% 38%
2012Total
72% 33%
Difference +0% +5%
High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores
BHS
MathematicsCA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.
2013 %Adv. & Prof.
% DIFFAdv. & Prof.
2012 %FBB &
BB
2013 %FBB &
BB
% DIFFFBB &
BB
Algebra 20 23 +3 58 53 -5
Geometry 15 8 -7 63 75 +12
Algebra 2
41 30 -11 37 46 +9
MathTotal
25 21 -4 52 57 +5
BHS
MathematicsCA Standards Test Four Year Trend
BHS
Mathematic Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model
2012CST
PA 1Adv/Prof
PA 1Participation
Rate
PA 2Adv/Prof
PA 2Participation
Rate
PA 3Adv/Prof
PA 3Participation
Rate
2013CST
Algebra 20% 32% 78.3% 21% 77.3% 25% 95.7% 23%
Geomet 15% 6% 74.4% 2% 79.1% 9% 94.5% 8%
BHS
MathematicsCAHSEE Census
Two Year Comparison
Math Math % Passing
Math % Proficient
2013Total
82% 59.2%
2012Total
81% 55%
Difference +1% +4.2%
High School AYP calculated through CAHSEE Census Proficiency Scores
BHS
Social StudiesCA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.
2013 %Adv. & Prof.
% DIFFAdv. & Prof.
2012 %FBB &
BB
2013 %FBB &
BB
% DIFFFBB &
BB
US History
41 47 +6 29 22 -7
World History
30 33 +3 37 36 -1
HistoryTotal
35 39 +4 33 30 -3
BHS
Social StudiesCA Standards Test Four Year Trend
BHS
Social Studies Periodic Assessments CST Predictive Model
2012CST
PA 1Adv/Prof
PA 1Participation
Rate
PA 2Adv/Prof
PA 2Participation
Rate
PA 3Adv/Prof
PA 3Participation
Rate
2013CST
History 10 30% 37% 93.8% 25% 67.5% 31% 95% 36%
BHS
Science CA Standards Test Data Summary
Two Year Comparison
Subject2012 %Adv. & Prof.
2013 %Adv. & Prof.
% DIFFAdv. & Prof.
2012 %FBB &
BB
2013%FBB &
BB
% DIFFFBB &
BB
Life Science
33 40 +7 32 27 -5
Biology 37 27 -10 26 32 +6
Chem. 22 30 +8 48 32 -16
ScienceTotal
30 32 +2 35 31 -4
BHS
ScienceCA Standards Test Four Year Trend
BHS
Science Periodic Assessments - CSTPredictive Model
2012CST
PA 1
Adv/Prof
PA 1Participation
Rate
PA 2
Adv/Prof
PA 2Participation
Rate
PA 3Adv/Prof
PA 3Participation
Rate
2013CST
Biology 37% 7% 77.1% 6% 71.3% 12% 95.7% 27%
Chemistry 22% 38% 91.7% 17% 73.3% 29% 94.5% 30%
BHS
2012-13 QEIA Goals
BHSAchievement
Requirements2012-13
QEIA Goals
2012-13QEIA Results
MetYes / No
9th Grade ELA CST Proficiency or
Above
36% 39% YES
9th Grade Matriculation
71% 78% YES
9th Grade Algebra 1 CST Proficiency or
Above
21% 28% YES
World & US History Proficiency or
Above
24% 39% YES
Biology & Chemistry
Proficiency or Above
20% 28% YES
API Exceed Target Growth
7 20**Estimate without
SPED
Pending
Interpreting Progress Towards Targets
In looking at the PA and CST results, what do you notice? What patterns do you see? Have you reached your CST target?If you made gains you desired, what attributed to the gains in your estimates?If this data remains constant, what might be the possible reasons?What successful instructional practices/strategies are being implemented to address the needs of your students?What are your hunches about what might need to happen next to impact this data?What other data do you still need?
22
BHS
Revisiting Strategies
Based on your data for the school year and your classroom observations, to what extent is your instructional plan working effectively?
What strategies did you call out?
23
BHS
Strategy grid for analyzing results and determining next steps
24
BHS
Intervention Design – How do we respond to the data?
Based on today’s dialogue what can you add, continue, or modify to sustain and/or improve your results?
How can we leverage the strengths of your department to support our school in improving?
As the Instructional Leader, Department Administrator, Department Chair, what action/commitment will be your first priority?
25
BHS