benchmarking terminology for protection performance

7
Analyze Assure Accelerate Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance Takumi Kimura Jerry Perser 55 th IETF Atlanta, USA

Upload: chelsey

Post on 05-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


5 download

DESCRIPTION

Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance. Takumi Kimura Jerry Perser. 55 th IETF Atlanta, USA. System Under Test (SUT). Protection trigger. OADM. Router. Sender. OADM. Router. Receiver. Protection. OADM. Light path. 54th IETF - Yokohama. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Takumi Kimura

Jerry Perser

55th IETF

Atlanta, USA

Page 2: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

54th IETF - Yokohama

• Takumi Presented automatic protection system – SONET/SDH rings

– RPR

• Takumi was asked to refine his proposal

OADMLight path

Protection

Protection trigger

OADMOADM

SenderRouter Receiver

Router

System Under Test (SUT)

Page 3: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

55th IETF - Atlanta

• Draft submitted– http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-kimura-

protection-term-00.txt

– Draft 00 contains non technology-specific parts.

• technology-specific parts (SONET/SDH APS, etc.) will be added

• Still focused on SONET/SDH rings– Should we focus on measuring sub-IP protection

schemes on IP performance?

– Include MPLS, Spanning Tree, etc…

Page 4: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

Several Advantages

• Not limited to SONET/SDH APS

– Adopt to MPLS by using a different trigger

• Measures the effect of failover on IP

– Other drafts concentrate on control plane only

• Observes more than packet loss

Dropped packets

Induced delay

Out-of-order packets

Duplicate packets

123 45 67

123456 4

1267

1234

Page 5: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

Motivation

• Different Protection technologies

– Automatic Protection Switching (APS) for SONET/SDH

– Resilient Packet Ring (RPR) for Ethernet

– Fast Reroute for Multi-Protocol Label Switching (MPLS)

• Recovery timing in IP-layer is different from that in sub-IP layer.

• Standard Testing methodology to compare implementation’s performance

Page 6: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

Goals

• Set focus on ?– SDH performance, or sub IP technologies

• Incorporate different topologies

• Incorporate different protection types

• Add technology-specific part (especially, SONET/SDH APS) to the draft

• Move draft from Individual work to BMWG working draft

Page 7: Benchmarking Terminology for Protection Performance

Analyze Assure Accelerate

Finished

• Takumi Kimura

– Phone: +81 422 59 3026

– EMail: [email protected]

• Jerry Perser

– Phone: + 1 818 676 2300

– EMail: [email protected]