benefit cost analysis of green roofs for multifamily high-rise facilities in portland, oregon
TRANSCRIPT
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Benefit Cost Analysis of Green
Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise
Facilities in
Portland, Oregon
Hassalo on Eighth, Portland, OR.
Mona Qaddoumi
1
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
June 13, 2015
Marylhurst University
Natural Resource Economics
Table of Contents
Executive Summary 3
Introduction 4
Literature Review 5
Assumptions and Outputs 5
Methodology 6
Data Requirements 7
Data Shortcomings 8
BCA Findings 9
Project Analysis 9
Conclusions 15
References 17
Appendix A 19
Appendix B 21
2
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Appendix C 23
Appendix D 25
Executive Summary
Throughout this Benefit Cost Analysis the fundamental elements to consider go
beyond that which is quantifiable in dollar terms. Even though green roofs have been
around for centuries, modern implementation is relatively new. The costs and benefits
include a number of social, environmental and fiscal factors. However, even with the
data available, there are a number of shortcomings that affect the over efficacy of green
roofs.
Initial costs of installing a green roof are dependent on the type of green roof to be
installed as well as the square footage of the roof. National averages have been applied
into the cost analysis as it relates to this specific project of a 40,000sqft semi-intensive
green roof. Additional maintenance costs are also included as tending to plant life is
needed on a regular basis.
Benefits of installing a green roof take in consideration hard statistics such as
energy savings and stormwater management. It also considers more objective, but still
statistically monetized environmental applications such as, air quality improvements,
carbon sequestering and habitat formation for invertebrates and birds.
Outside of concrete fiscal benefits are the non-monetized social, environmental
and economic benefits of installing a green roof. These include job creation,
marketability and increased urban habitat. Marketability could potentially be monetized,
but there is a lack of research on rent and occupancy rates of multifamily buildings
associated with green roofs.
This Benefit Cost Analysis found that even over a 40-year period and the
factoring in of the replacement of a black roof (at 20 years), green roofs fall short on hard
ROI. The fact of the matter is installing green roofs go beyond fiscal investments. The
overall benefits outweigh the costs as can be seen within this report. My hypothesis is
3
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
that the government will need to motivate the enforcement of green roofs to improve the
lives of its people and to strengthen the future economy.
Introduction
Objective
The objective of this Benefit-Cost Analysis is to identify the associated costs and benefits
of installing a semi-intensive green roof on a multifamily high-rise building. This report
will include private and public benefits that this practice has for its inhabitants and the
local community. It will generate a cost analysis by looking at the benefits to show not
only monetary savings, but also social and
environmental savings as a result from its
function.
Scope of Work
This analysis will take specific data of the Green
Roof projects in Portland, Oregon, as well as more
general data from other projects to identify cost
benefits. It will look into the costs of creating and
maintaining a semi-intensive green roof by
researching averages by square foot. The semi-
intensive green roof will have 6-10 inches of soil
with a diversity of plant life over a 40,000sqft
surface.
The benefit cost analysis will consider
many major components. These components will
include, energy efficiency, roof durability and
longevity, noise reduction and marketability.
Other benefits will include, water diversion, storm
water management, air quality and carbon sequestering (Green Roofs for Healthy Cities,
Key Findings
The longevity of green roofs out
performs the traditional black
roofs by 20 years.
Initial and long-term private cost
benefits include, energy saved,
replacement costs saved, federal
incentives and direct stormwater
management.
Initial and long-term public cost
benefits include, improved air
quality, improved water quality,
carbon sequestering and reducing
stormwater runoff.
4
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
2014). This data will provide an analysis of the cost benefits and come to a conclusion of
green roof efficacy.
History
Green Roof technologies were modernized in the early seventies in Germany
and then later further developed in the late eighties to reduce costs and refine
techniques (Jörg Breuning & Green Roof Service LLC, 2015). As a revived ancient
system, Green Roofs were originally intended to restore nature and protect roof
membranes, but as the technology flourished scientific research began to find a
number of other benefits including, "waste diversion, storm water management,
improved air quality, energy efficiency and much more" (Green Roofs for Healthy
Cities, 2014).
Literature Review
Key data findings for this Benefit Cost Analysis were pulled from various BCA
reports conducted by the City of Portland, the United States General Services
Administration (GSA) and Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. Each report touches on
monetized findings based on green roof size and type. The report conducted by the GSA
is cited in the Green Roofs for Healthy Cities report and the GSA report used over 200
studies to compile their information.
Additional information was retrieved from various businesses, building websites
and green roof company websites. Marketability information includes an online survey
conducted on Facebook asking two questions relating to the willingness-to-pay for a
green roof on top of a high-rise multifamily facility. Dynamic efficiency includes
information retrieved from a phone interview with Amy Chomowicz, the program
director for the City of Portland’s Ecoroof Program. Each resource will be cited on the
reference page. The survey components will be explained in Appendix D.
Assumptions and Outputs
5
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Information provided for the data comes from a number of sources including,
local and federal reports as well as specific city or state findings other than Portland,
Oregon. Specific data sets as well as average data sets between listed sources are used
for the analysis in this BCA.
Methodology
Cost Effectiveness
When considering a green roof for a multifamily high-rise facility, cost effectiveness
will need to be taken into consideration. Owners of these building types typically regard
them as financial investments, so it is important to show the cost effectiveness and
benefits to installing a green roof to further prove its efficacy. Included in this analysis
will be the consideration of the following data in private cost effectiveness:
Installation costs/square feet of green roof compared to black roofs
Green roof versus black roof longevity (years before replacement)
Annual maintenance cost differences
Energy efficiency increases associated with green roofs
Stormwater management costs
Federal incentives
The timeline to consider will be 40 years, which is the average lifespan of a green
roof. This will show the costs of installing and maintaining a green roof compared to a
black roof as well as the benefit of not having the replacement costs of a black roof at the
20-year mark.
Green roofs offer a number of public benefits in addition to the private benefits to
the direct owner and inhabitants of the building. Data found from DC Greenworks, The
City of Portland Ecoroof Program and the GSA’s Green Roof Benefits and Challenges
report are incorporated into the assumptions and benefits of this analysis. These benefits
include:
Improved Air Quality
Stormwater Improvements
Carbon Sequestering
Marketability
6
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
In addition, non-monetized public benefits were also analyzed for the sake of
further understanding the total system benefit. These benefits include:
Job Creation
Increased Urban Habitat
Aesthetics and Biophilia
Data Requirements
When considering green roofs this analysis will look at private, public and
economic benefits.
Identify Incentives: (Doshi, H. & Peck, S. n.d.)
Design and installation grants
Tax and fee rebates,
Preferable zoning allowances
Identify Costs: Green Roofs for Healthy Cities: Working Draft 13 (Doshi, H. & Peck, S.
n.d.)
Cost of a cubic meter or cubic foot of stormwater
Cost of energy
Cost of annual maintenance
Cost of initial investment
Cost of replacement of black roof
Calculate the benefits as it relates to: (GSA GREEN ROOF BENEFITS AND
CHALLENGES, 2011).
Stormwater management
Biodiversity and habitat
Energy
Marketability
Air quality
Aesthetics and quality of life (biophilia)
7
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Job generation and economic development
Roof longevity
Carbon sequestering
Other data to consider: (GSA GREEN ROOF BENEFITS AND CHALLENGES,
2011)
Building structural requirements
Historic buildings
Codes and standards
Contractor skills
Handling and knowledge of plants
Safety training and personnel
Plant establishment
Leaks and leak detection
Plant loss
Wind scour
Root penetration and biodegradation
Data Shortcomings
Gathering data on storm flow dynamics is typically only one to three years and
according to the City of Portland’s 2008 study of 40,000sqft, 5-story extensive green roof
with 5inches of soil, they had an initial cost savings associated with Avoided Stormwater
Systems Improvement of $16.334 versus the City of Toronto’s study which was only
$2.368 (Hitesh & Peck (n.d.). Data averages from stormwater will depend on the
environment’s average rainfall as well as the type of green roof (i.e., intensive or
extensive).
In addition, most data for this analysis was pulled from GSA’s report from 2011,
costs and benefits may have increased since then. Other shortcomings include, lack of
specific data related to marketability, soil type, irrigation type, roof membrane statistics
and specific information related to maintenance costs.
8
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
BCA Findings
The present value (PV) benefits totaled to $553,698.54 for the analysis of a
40,000sqft semi-intensive green roof over a 40-year period, in addition to a present value
(PV) of costs of $1,097,390.25. The benefit cost ratio came to 0.504559. Included in this
analysis were the monetized environmental benefits to installing a green roof. Also
included, was the added benefit of not having to replace the roof after 20 years, which is
the average lifespan of a black roof.
The present value (PV) of costs came to $1,097,390.25. This data was calculated
by taking the initial and annual costs associated with a 40,000sqft semi-intensive green
roof. An inflation rate of 3% was added to each year after the initial year for annual
replacement costs. A discount rate of 4% was added to the annual present value of
replacement costs. The discount rate takes into account unknown future costs such as,
soil replacement, drought, plant loss, plant scour and possible leaks that need repairing.
The present value (PV) of benefits came to $553,698.54. Total benefits would
average $19,808.60 annually and include private benefits associated with energy savings,
stormwater management, federal incentives and the correlated costs of longevity as it
compares to black roofs. Public benefits include avoided stormwater management costs,
air quality improvements and carbon sequestering.
Project Analysis
Instrument Target Addressee Regulation Area
Standard: Building green roofs on the top of multifamily housing high-rise facilities
Increase efficiency of stormwater management
Increase roof longevity
Improve air
Multifamily High Rise Communities
Renters Owners Developers
Portland, Oregon and the greater metro area
9
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
quality Create a
biospace from residents
Cost Effectiveness, Economy Efficiency & Non-Monetized Benefits
Improved Air Quality and Carbon Sequestering
Green roofs improve air quality in urban areas. Vegetation growth can sequester
carbon dioxide as well as improve or remove Particulate Matter, Nitrogen Oxide
Compounds and Sulfur-Oxygen Compounds (Hitesh & Peck, n.d.). “Carbon [dioxide] is
sequestered in plants through photosynthesis, and it is stored in the soil and roots” (GSA,
2011). Plants from green roofs can intercept Nitrogen Oxide and Particulate Matter,
which both cause pollution. By removing these pollutants from the air as well as
lowering greenhouse gases, such as Carbon Dioxide, green roofs can not only help
improve human health, but could also help slow global warming.
Stormwater Improvements
In urban areas, stormwater management has become increasing complicated. Sewer
overflows, water processing and acid rainfall all affect the health and costs of both the
private and public sector. Green roofs have a great impact on stormwater management.
According to the GSA’s report, “Green roofs can reduce the rate of runoff from a roof by
up to 65%” as well as, “catch and permanently retain the first ½ to ¾ inch or rainfall”
(2011).
Underground pipes, private water systems and public water management affect both
the owner of the building as well as the taxpayer on a monetary basis. By limiting the
amount of water in the system, a city can lower costs associated with regular
maintenance.
Green roofs also have demonstrated to be effective in reducing pollutants in water,
thus creating cleaner run-off. However, other studies have shown that the opposite can
occur. Added compounds from soil and fertilizer can contaminate surface water causing
a decrease in water purity (GSA, 2011).
10
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Marketability
The marketability of green roofs within the private enterprise is promising. Recently,
there has been a dramatic increase of multifamily high-rise facilities in Portland with
LEED certifications as well as specific targeted advertising associated with sustainability.
This ‘Sustainable Branding’ is not just limited to real estate; many companies have
adopted Corporate Social Responsibility agendas in addition to implementing sustainable
programs.
From a willingness-to-pay (WTP) average of nine individuals surveyed online via
Facebook, there was an overall inclination towards renting from a building with a green
roof. Six out of the nine participants were willing to pay $50 or more per month for
access to a green roof. Three were willing to pay $75-$150 more per month. These
additional benefits could be added to the BCA; however, more data with a larger
demographic would be needed.
Job Creation
Deciding to install a green roof versus a black roof will help stimulate the
economy. It will add jobs associated with both the initial costs as well more long-term
jobs associated with the maintenance costs. Job creation helps to sustain an economy and
strengthen a community.
Urban Habitat
In urban environments, most native wildlife suffers from loss of habitat. By
adding a green roof to a high-rise building it will “attract species including birds and
invertebrates. [Semi-Intensive and] Intensive roofs typically support a greater diversity
of rare bird species than extensive roofs” (GSA, 2011).
Aesthetics and Biophilia
Many studies show that increased access to nature can help improve mood and
productivity. According to a study from the University of Melbourne, “Subjects who
11
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
took a 40-second break from a demanding task to gaze at an image of a green roof
improved performance and accuracy when they continued with the task” (Ashford, 2015).
This phenomenon is outlined in concept of Biophilia. Biophilia is the hypothesis that
people are mentally and physically affected by the presence or lack of nature (Rogers,
2015). This concept shows the direct benefits of adding a green roof to a building.
Aesthetics also plays a role in human mood and personal pride. Most people
would much rather look at a garden, than black asphalt. Specific to multifamily housing,
tenants can feel a sense of pride when bring guests over. In addition to these sentiments,
aesthetics can also increase property value. People will typically pay more for something
they view as beautiful.
Fairness
Standard application of this type of project would be applied to building owners and
developers of multifamily high-rise facilities. The benefits of this type of project affect
the following individuals, companies and institutions:
To building owner(s) or developer-by increasing the initial costs of construction
and annual maintenance, while also reducing costs of annual energy consumption,
stormwater management and roof longevity.
To the builder, architects and general contractors-by increasing costs, production
time and the hiring of plant/green roof specialists.
To the building occupants-by improving mental and physical health as well as
productivity.
To the green roof specialists and contractors-by increasing their sales and
portfolio as well as possibly gaining new insight on how to achieve results in a
more cost efficient way.
To municipality-by decreasing associated costs with stormwater management and
related new construction infrastructure costs (GSA, 2011).
To the community-by increasing aesthetics, job creation and increasing
biodiversity (GSA, 2011).
12
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Dynamic Efficiency
The City of Portland no longer offers the incentive of $5/sqft to build a green
roof. As of right now they do not anticipate that to change, however, an increase in
funding for education related to the benefits of green roofs is being considered.
(Chomowicz, 2015). Educating potential tenants and investors on the benefits for
installing a green roof is the first step in growing this practice. Green roofs have the
potential to add value to the property in many different ways. By understanding the long-
term cost benefits, investors can up-sell their building to future buyers. In addition to the
basic modern and known cost savings, future environmental concerns may stimulate new
government tax rebates and incentives related to green roofs, thus further accumulating
cost savings.
At this point, green roofs are not mandatory, but with a rapidly increasing demand
for multifamily housing and a disappearing green landscape, there may be a place for it in
the future. This analysis describes the known and modern practices of green roof
installation for large flat rooftops. Future practices may become more cost effect through
availability and innovation. According to Lux Research innovations in installation and
maintenance costs of green roofs could be cut by 28% by 2017 (Lux Research Inc, n.d.).
There are a number of reasons why someone would invest in this type of project.
In Portland, Oregon there has been a rapid expansion in multifamily housing as well as an
influx of relocating out of state residents. To differentiate from the competition, and to
stay within alignment of the cities’ well-known environmental interests, development
companies are consistently one-upping each other on technological advancements for
sustainability.
For example, Hassalo on Eighth is one of the newest additions to the multifamily
industry here in Portland. This property consists of three buildings with close to 700
livable units as well as retail space; it will be the largest multifamily facility in the
Portland Metro Area. Their front page slogan on their website reads, “Portland’s Newest
Neighborhood, An eco-community, Drawing us together” (American Assets Trust, 2015).
13
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
They also have a constantly updating graph showing the sustainable and environmental
investments made during the construction of the buildings. This is a testament to green
roof marketability. Investors can utilize sustainability features to their buildings as an
enticement for future residents
Moral Considerations
For green roofs, moral considerations would include social and environmental
wellness. Increasing our application of personal well being into business decisions will
help facilitate positive moral values.
Dependability
Dependability relates to the risks and uncertainty that the project will meet the
standards and cost effectiveness stated in the proposal. With construction projects, many
times initial costs can be greater than expected because of new information found when
deconstructing certain parts of a building. In the long run, that data is consistently
beneficial, as long as the green roofs are well maintained.
Complications include:
Plant loss
Wind Scour
Root Penetration and Biodegradation
Building Damage due to Improper Installation
Uncovering other building problems during installation (dry rot, infestation,
improper building codes)
Uncovering building upgrades needed to properly install and maintain the ecoroof
Resident compliance and care (with access to the roof, will the residents abuse the
area?)
Political Acceptability
14
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
This type of project does not have huge implications for politics, yet. Partial or
full green roofs could be a great addition to codes for new construction and old buildings
that generate too much waste. The entirety of benefits analyzed in this BCA for green
roofs shows an enormous value to our municipalities. Green roofs can significantly
lower stormwater management costs as well as improve air quality in increasingly
crowded urban areas. Indirectly, this could improve the mental and physical health of the
community. This would add an enormous benefit if it could keep high cost healthcare,
such as, asthma related emergencies out of the ER, especially for patients who cannot
afford treatment.
Flexibility
Ecoroofs will change over time due to the plants growth, weather conditions and
natural shifts in the buildings movement. Changing elements will include:
Plant loss
Wind Scour
Root Penetration and Biodegradation
Property Rights
For this project the property rights will be relatively cut and dry. The target
market is privately owned multifamily high-rise facilities. There may be times were
multiple investors own the building, in which all or the majority will need to be on board
for the initial extra expense of a green roof.
Conclusions
The total values constructed in this analysis only give a glimpse into the entire
picture of building a green roof. In the end the monetary costs of installing a green roof
are greater than the monetary benefits. However, it is incredibly clear that many of the
benefits to green roofs cannot be properly monetized. More research will need to be done
to identify hard statistics to justify installing a green roof.
15
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
The sum of benefits versus costs shows the most value to government institutions.
The real incentive to build a green roof is to increase the quality of life and activate the
economy. Investing in green roofs is not just an investment in a product that can extend
the life of the roof or add additional maintenance costs to the budget; it is an investment
for the future.
References:
16
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
American Assets Trust. (2015). Hassalo On Eighth. [Website]. Retrieved From:
http://hassalooneighth1.tru-m.com/?utm_campaign=OMG+-
+Apartments&utm_source=google&utm_medium=ppc&utm_term=hassalo+on+eighth&
utm_content=1368098x696696351324719332
Ashford, K. (2015). Looking At Green Roofs May Boost Your Work Productivity.
Forbes Magazine Online. [Website]. Retrieved From:
http://www.forbes.com/sites/kateashford/2015/05/29/green-roofs/
Balducci, P. (n.d.) Unit 3: Environmental Policy Instruments. [Lecture]. Retrieved from:
https://moodle.marylhurst.edu/pluginfile.php/343712/mod_book/chapter/42732/
Environmental_Policy_Lecture_Part_1.swf
Chomowicz, A., Personal Communication, June 5, 2014.
City of Portland, Oregon. (2015). Ecoroof Incentive. [Website]. Retrieved From:
https://www.portlandoregon.gov/bes/48724
GSA Green Roof Benefits And Challenges. (N.D.). The Benefits and Challenges of
Green Roofs on Public and Commercial Buildings. [Website]. Retrieved From:
http://www.gsa.gov/portal/mediaId/158783/fileName/The_Benefits_and_Challenges_of_
Green_Roofs_on_Public_and_Commercial_Buildings.action
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for Estimating Economic Public Benefits from
Regional Implementation of Green Roof Technology-Working Draft Paper for Review.
[Website]. Retrieved From: http://www.greenroofs.org/resources/Doshi&Peck.pdf
Green Roofs for Healthy Cities. (2014). Green Roof Benefits. [Website] Retrieved from
http://www.greenroofs.org/index.php/about/greenroofbenefits
17
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Jörg Breuning & Green Roof Service LLC. (2015). Green Roof Technology: Form and
Function. History. [Website]. Retrieved from
http://www.greenrooftechnology.com/history-of-green-roofs
Lux Research (n.d.). Innovation Will Drive Costs of Green Roofs and Walls by 28% in
2017. [Website]. Retreived From:
http://www.luxresearchinc.com/news-and-events/press-releases/read/innovation-will-
drive-costs-green-roofs-and-walls-28-2017
Rafida, S. & Rahman, A. (n.d.). Green Roofs as Urban Antidote: A Review on Aesthetic,
Environmental, Economic and Social Benefits. [Website]. Retrieved From:
http://www.academia.edu/2283321/Green_roofs_as_urban_antidote_A_review_on_aesth
etic_environmental_economic_and_social_benefits
Rogers, K. (2015). Biophilia Hypothesis. [Website]. Retrieved From:
http://www.britannica.com/science/biophilia-hypothesis
Stamats Communications, Inc. (2014). Calculating the Life Cycle Cost of a Roof.
[Website]. Retrieved From:
http://www.buildings.com/article-details/articleid/13816/title/calculating-the-life-cycle-
cost-of-a-roof.aspx
Plant Connection Inc. (2015). Green Roof Legislation, Policies & Tax Incentives.
[Website]. Retrieved From: http://myplantconnection.com/green-roofs-legislation.php
18
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Appendix A
Assumptions and BCA Outputs
PV Benefits $553,698.54 PV Costs $1,097,390.25 Benefit/Cost Ratio 0.504559 Benefits Total Annual Total Timeframe Energy Savings $15,423.21 Annual Stormwater improvement $8,800.52 Initial Avoided Stormwater System Operating and Maintenance $1,330.48 Annual Air Quality (Particulates) $3,025.18 Annual Carbon Dioxide Sequestering $29.73 Annual Habitat Creation (US Biodiversity Banking System) $141.60 Initial Federal Incentives $72,000.000 Initial Costs Total Cost of installing a semi-intensive green roof per sqft (labor, materials and irrigation included) $727,600.00 Initial Additional Annual Maintenance Costs for semi-intensive green roof per square feet $11,200.00 Annual Assumptions Square footage of roof 40,000 Square Meters of roof 3716.435938 Square Foot/Square Meter 10.763 Time Horizon 40 Years Discount Rate 4% Inflation Rate 3% Cost Elements Measurement Timeframe Source Cost of installing a semi-intensive green roof per sqft (labor,
$18.19 Initial GSA year
19
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
materials and irrigation included)Additional Annual Maintenance Costs for semi-intensive green roof per square feet $0.28 Annual GSA Benefit Elements Measurement Timeframe Source
Energy Savings Cost per kWh/m2/year $4.15 Annual
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for estimating economic public benefits from regional implementation of green roof technology-working draft paper for review
Stormwater Improvement per m2 $2.368 Initial
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for estimating economic public benefits from regional implementation of green roof technology-working draft paper for review
Avoided Stormwater System Operating and Maintenance per m2 $0.358 Annual
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for estimating economic public benefits from regional implementation of green roof technology-working draft paper for review
Air Quality (Particulates) per m2 $0.814 Annual
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for estimating economic public benefits from regional implementaion of green roof technology-working draft paper for review
Carbon Dioxide Sequestering per m2 $0.008 Annual
Hitesh, D. & Peck, S. (n.d.). Methods for estimating economic public benefits from regional implementaion of green roof technology-working draft paper for review
Habitat Creation (US Biodiversity Banking System) Initial Savings per m2 $0.038 Initial GSAFederal Incentives per sqft $1.800 Initial
Plant Connection Inc. Green Roof Legislation, Policies & Tax Incentives
Cost of not paying for second conventional roof - Year 20 benefit $170,000
Once every 20 years Choice Roof Contractors
20
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Appendix B
Annual and Present Value Costs
Square Foot 40,000 Initial Investment $727,600.00 Annual Cost $11,200.00 Discount Rate 4% Inflation Rate 3%
Year Annual Replacement CostsAnnual Present Value of Replacement
Costs0 $727,600.00 $727,600.001 $11,536.00 $11,092.312 $11,882.08 $10,985.653 $12,238.54 $10,880.024 $12,605.70 $10,775.405 $12,983.87 $10,671.796 $13,373.39 $10,569.187 $13,774.59 $10,467.558 $14,187.82 $10,366.909 $14,613.46 $10,267.2210 $15,051.86 $10,168.5011 $15,503.42 $10,070.7312 $15,968.52 $9,973.8913 $16,447.58 $9,877.9914 $16,941.00 $9,783.0115 $17,449.24 $9,688.9416 $17,972.71 $9,595.7817 $18,511.89 $9,503.5118 $19,067.25 $9,412.1319 $19,639.27 $9,321.6320 $20,228.45 $9,232.0021 $20,835.30 $9,143.2322 $21,460.36 $9,055.3123 $22,104.17 $8,968.2424 $22,767.29 $8,882.0125 $23,450.31 $8,796.6126 $24,153.82 $8,712.0227 $24,878.44 $8,628.2528 $25,624.79 $8,545.2929 $26,393.53 $8,463.1230 $27,185.34 $8,381.7531 $28,000.90 $8,301.1532 $28,840.93 $8,221.3433 $29,706.15 $8,142.2834 $30,597.34 $8,063.9935 $31,515.26 $7,986.4536 $32,460.72 $7,909.6637 $33,434.54 $7,833.61
21
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
38 $34,437.57 $7,758.2839 $35,470.70 $7,683.6940 $36,534.82 $7,609.80
PV Costs $1,097,390.25
Appendix C
22
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Annual and Present Value of Replacement Benefits
Square Feet 40000 Initial Savings $80,942.12 Annual savings $19,808.60 Discount rate 4%
YearAnnual
Replacement Benefits
Annual Present Value of
Replacement Benefits
Replacement Costs of
Traditional Roof
0 $80,942.12 $80,942.12 -1 $19,808.60 $19,046.73 -2 $19,808.60 $18,314.17 -3 $19,808.60 $17,609.78 -4 $19,808.60 $16,932.48 -5 $19,808.60 $16,281.23 -6 $19,808.60 $15,655.03 -7 $19,808.60 $15,052.91 -8 $19,808.60 $14,473.95 -9 $19,808.60 $13,917.26 -10 $19,808.60 $13,381.98 -11 $19,808.60 $12,867.29 -12 $19,808.60 $12,372.40 -13 $19,808.60 $11,896.53 -14 $19,808.60 $11,438.97 -15 $19,808.60 $10,999.01 -16 $19,808.60 $10,575.98 -17 $19,808.60 $10,169.21 -18 $19,808.60 $9,778.08 -19 $189,808.60 $90,091.22 $170,000 20 $19,808.60 $9,040.39 -21 $19,808.60 $8,692.68 -22 $19,808.60 $8,358.35 -23 $19,808.60 $8,036.87 -24 $19,808.60 $7,727.76 -25 $19,808.60 $7,430.54 -26 $19,808.60 $7,144.75 -27 $19,808.60 $6,869.95 -28 $19,808.60 $6,605.72 -29 $19,808.60 $6,351.66 -30 $19,808.60 $6,107.36 -31 $19,808.60 $5,872.46 -32 $19,808.60 $5,646.60 -33 $19,808.60 $5,429.42 -34 $19,808.60 $5,220.60 -35 $19,808.60 $5,019.81 -36 $19,808.60 $4,826.74 -
23
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
37 $19,808.60 $4,641.09 -38 $19,808.60 $4,462.59 -39 $19,808.60 $4,290.95 -40 $19,808.60 $4,125.92
Total $1,043,286.26 PV benefits $553,698.54
Appendix D
24
BCA of Green Roofs for Multifamily High-Rise Facilities in Portland, Oregon
Individually Developed Survey
I. Format Used
a. Online Survey via Facebook (posted on main timeline as well as in St.
John’s Gardening and Permaculture Group)
II. Survey Questions:
a. If you are renting in an urban area would you be wiling to pay extra each
month for access to a green roof?
b. If so, how much more a month would you be willing to pay?
III. Associated Feedback
a. Nine individuals responded
b. Ilko, Laurie, Jannae and Ben all had contingencies of being allotted some
space to use for urban agriculture
Individual’s Name Monthly Amount Willing to Pay for Green Roof
Lydia $50-$150/monthMaeleigh $50-$150/monthMegan $50/monthIlko $25-$50/monthBen $25/monthAlex $25/monthJannae $25-$75/monthScott $15/monthLaurie $50/month
25