better evidence. better decisions. better health: e

14
Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e-Clinical Quality Measures May 2016

Upload: others

Post on 18-May-2022

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

BetterEvidence.BetterDecisions.BetterHealth:e-ClinicalQualityMeasures

May2016

Page 2: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e
Page 3: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

LearningHealthSystemAccordingtoChuckFriedman

Page 4: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

LearningHealthSystemAccordingtoONC

Page 5: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

Technology ChallengesThe eCQM tools from vendors did not work as expected, and could not efficiently generate accurate measure results:

• Hospitals experienced significant difficulty implementing eCQM tools in their EHRs.

• The EHR could not draw relevant data from other systems

Clinical Challenges• eCQM reporting tools were poorly aligned with clinical workflow, necessitating the

redesign of the patient care systems or the re-tooling of the reporting tools.• Validation efforts were extensive, but not successful.• Clinical staff did not trust the data.• Rigid regulatory requirements caused the eCQMs to be out-of-date and out of step

with advances in care; updates were available late in the process but were difficult to find and optional for vendors to incorporate.

Page 6: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

LearningHealthSystemAccordingtoONC

standards ≠ standardization

Page 7: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

WherearestandardsforHITandClinicalResearchHarmonized?

Page 8: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

pSCANNERNetworkConnecting21Mpatients’EHRData

• 5 University of California Medical Centers• Cedar’s Sinai Hospital • Pacific NW Rural Health Practice-Based

Research Network• Los Angeles Department of Health Services• 5 multi-site FQHCs• Children’s Hospital of Los Angeles• Keck Medicine of USC

Page 9: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

InterpretingResultsinContext

Apply NQF criteria here... Valid? Feasible? Important?

• eCQM reporting tools were poorly aligned with clinical workflow, necessitating the redesign of the patient care systems or the re-tooling of the reporting tools.

• Validation efforts were extensive, but not successful.• Clinical staff did not trust the data.• Rigid regulatory requirements caused the eCQMs to be out-of-date and out of step

with advances in care; updates were available late in the process but were difficult to find and optional for vendors to incorporate.

Incentivize Change Here $$

Clean, Standardize, and Harmonize Data Actionable, Timely

Information

Page 10: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e
Page 11: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

http://uscdemo1.meliorix.com:5601/app/kibana#/dashboard/HQMF-Dashboard

Page 12: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e
Page 13: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e

• Harvard Pilgrim• UCLA• Northwestern (with GPC CDRN)

Page 14: Better Evidence. Better Decisions. Better Health: e