bill scharffenberg u.s. army corps of engineers hydrologic engineering center

17
CWEMF Oct 2006 Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center Hydrologic Modeling System Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS HEC-HMS

Upload: fionan

Post on 10-Feb-2016

30 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Hydrologic Modeling System HEC-HMS. Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center. HEC-HMS Background. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Bill ScharffenbergU.S. Army Corps of EngineersHydrologic Engineering Center

Hydrologic Modeling SystemHydrologic Modeling SystemHEC-HMSHEC-HMS

Page 2: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

HEC-HMS Background

• HEC-HMS is a complete engineering hydrology simulation system with model components for meteorology, subbasins, river reaches, reservoirs, and diversion structures.

• The subbasin component includes loss rate, surface transform, and baseflow subcomponents. Several model choices are available for each process.

• The reach component includes several routing methods from simple empirical methods to sophisticated approximations of the dynamic wave equation.

• The reservoir component can represent a dam using individual spillways, outlets, and other structures.

Page 3: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

HEC-HMS Background

Page 4: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Gridded Simulation

• Represent each subbasin as a collection of grid cells.• Gridded precipitation can come from radar rainfall, interpolated

gage data, or atmospheric models.• For continuous simulation, gridded Priestley-Taylor

evapotranspiration and gridded snowmelt.• Partially gridded loss methods use the same parameters and

initial conditions but different boundary conditions for all grid cells in a subbasin.

• Fully gridded loss methods use different parameters, initial conditions, and boundary conditions for each grid cell.

Page 5: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Gridded Simulation

Page 6: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Diversion Methods

• The existing diversion element is limited to a user-supplied function of inflow.

• Two new methods.– Lateral weir method uses a broad-crested spillway equation.– Pump station method uses a head-discharge pump.

• Stage in the channel is computed from flow with a user-supplied stage-discharge curve.

• Tailwater reductions are calculated with a second user-supplied stage-discharge curve representing flow characteristics on the "dry" side of the channel bank.

• An optimization routine is used to compute the diversion flow for each time step, assuming the diversion is a point in the channel and there are no storage changes.

Page 7: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Diversion Methods

Page 8: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Spillway Gates

• Reservoir element currently includes two spillways options without capability for gates:– Broad-crested spillway– Ogee spillway

• Add option for radial or vertical gates on both spillway types.• Each spillway can have up to 10 gate controls.

– Each gate control can have different parameters and includes the number of identically operating gates.

• Initially the only option for controlling the gates is a fixed opening height for the entire simulation; enhancements are already planned for a future release.

Page 9: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Spillway Gates

Page 10: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

• Percolation losses from the bottom of a streambed can be an important part of the water balance, especially in arid regions.

• Constant loss method with equation:

• Percolation loss method.– Compute inundation area and multiply by percolation rate.

• Revise all routing methods to include losses.– Use convergence algorithm to account for losses in the calculation

of routed flow.

Channel Losses

rQQQ lossroute 1

Page 11: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Channel Losses

Page 12: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

• The Smith Parlange model approximates Richard's infiltration equation with the principal assumption:

• K approximation allows Richard's equation to be linearized while maintaining a reasonable functional relationship between K and water content Θ.– Significantly faster to solve than Richard's equation.

• New research incorporated temperature affects.– Water density and viscosity.– Matric potential.

Smith Parlange Loss Method

eKK sat

Page 13: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Smith Parlange Loss Method

Page 14: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Nonlinear Boussinesq Baseflow

• Assumes an unconfined soil layer feeding baseflow.– Saturated at the end of a precipitation event.– Receives no recharge between events.

• Requires Dupuit assumptions:– Hydraulic gradient equal to the slope of the water table.– Streamlines are horizontal, equipotential lines are vertical.

• Resulting equation:

• Parameters a and b in the equation can be computed using physical properties of the watershed.

dtQQQ ttt 11

Page 15: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Nonlinear Boussinesq Baseflow

Page 16: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Next Release

• Targeted before end of 2006.• Development is 100% complete.• Testing is 90% complete.• Release decision expected soon.

www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-hms/

Page 17: Bill Scharffenberg U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center

CWEMF Oct 2006

Upcoming Development Work

• Surface erosion subcomponent will be added to the subbasin.– Build-up and wash-off method.– Modified universal soil loss equation (MUSLE).

• Nutrient subcomponent will be added to the subbasin element for simulating nitrogen and phosphorus processes.

• New statistical summaries for continuous simulations will help support ecosystem studies.

• New parameter estimation methods and tools will use optimization to better define parameters used in continuous simulation.

• New methods for snowmelt and frozen ground simulation.