bimonthly meeting on jan. 23, 2009
DESCRIPTION
Chemical Information on Phantom by Gaussian Function. Amarjeet Bhullar. Bimonthly Meeting on Jan. 23, 2009. 7*7=49 Voxels. Cho=3097.32. NAA=4818.51. Cre=3726.94. 15*15=225 Voxels. Cho=8497.17. NAA=13166.20. Cre=10162.30. 7*7=49 Voxels and 15*15=225 Voxels. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
Bimonthly Meeting on Jan. 23, 2009Chemical Information on Phantom by Gaussian FunctionAmarjeet Bhullar
-
7*7=49 VoxelsCho=3097.32Cre=3726.94NAA=4818.51
Voxel 1 to 49GaussianCho/Cre0.831Cho/NAA0.642
-
15*15=225 VoxelsCho=8497.17Cre=10162.30NAA=13166.20
Voxel 1 to 225GaussianCho/Cre0.836Cho/NAA0.645
-
7*7=49 Voxels and 15*15=225 Voxels
-
Comparison between 7*7 and 15*15 Spectra
Voxel 1 to 49GaussianCho/Cre0.831Cho/NAA0.642
Voxel 1 to 225GaussianCho/Cre0.836Cho/NAA0.645
-
Metabolite peaks fit by Gaussian function
-
Cho=26.4059Cre=38.3233NAA=50.3961Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Cho=30.047Cre=45.8772NAA=51.899Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Cho=27.7975Cre=39.7157NAA=50.4718Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Cho=34.0246Cre=49.0628NAA=60.5868Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Cho=123.506Cre=174.144NAA=220.372Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Cho=67.1154Cre=74.2094NAA=93.7448Calculation of Metabolite Concentrations
-
Voxel Comparison
15*15ChoCreNAAVox#3326.405938.323350.3961Vox#3430.047045.877251.8990Vox#4827.797539.715750.4718Vox#4934.024649.062860.5869Total Con.110.6558172.979213.3538
15*15ChoCreNAAVox#33+34+48+49123.506174.144220.372
7*7ChoCreNAAVox#967.115474.209493.7448
-
Conclusion:Even difference of smallest fraction between voxel size (7*7 and 15*15) creates differentmetabolite concentrations.Suggestions are welcome
-
Row Wise Distribution of Cho/Cre
-
Row Wise Distribution of Cho/NAA
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #1GaussianCho/Cre0.751014Cho/NAA0.82592
Voxel #2GaussianCho/Cre0.920288Cho/NAA1.204818
Voxel #3GaussianCho/Cre1.026504Cho/NAA1.00366
Voxel #4GaussianCho/Cre0.934274Cho/NAA1.265779
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #4GaussianCho/Cre0.934274Cho/NAA1.265779
Voxel #5GaussianCho/Cre0.913693Cho/NAA0.950665
Voxel #6GaussianCho/Cre0.905497Cho/NAA1.00024
Voxel #7GaussianCho/Cre0.890625Cho/NAA1.284948
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #8GaussianCho/Cre0.860931Cho/NAA0.544306
Voxel #9GaussianCho/Cre0.904406Cho/NAA0.715937
Voxel #10GaussianCho/Cre0.817914Cho/NAA0.667594
Voxel #11GaussianCho/Cre0.836532Cho/NAA0.680032
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #12GaussianCho/Cre0.859035Cho/NAA0.683185
Voxel #13GaussianCho/Cre0.84962Cho/NAA0.697155
Voxel #14GaussianCho/Cre0.770389Cho/NAA0.74367
Voxel #15GaussianCho/Cre0.915505Cho/NAA0.559509
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #16GaussianCho/Cre0.89351Cho/NAA0.650015
Voxel #17GaussianCho/Cre0.807657Cho/NAA0.605227
Voxel #18GaussianCho/Cre0.807195Cho/NAA0.619962
Voxel #19GaussianCho/Cre0.839769Cho/NAA0.611889
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #20GaussianCho/Cre0.815158Cho/NAA0.617085
Voxel #21GaussianCho/Cre0.691482Cho/NAA0.592537
Voxel #22GaussianCho/Cre0.808174Cho/NAA0.48208
Voxel #23GaussianCho/Cre0.842664Cho/NAA0.615965
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #24GaussianCho/Cre0.80954Cho/NAA0.616462
Voxel #25GaussianCho/Cre0.824471Cho/NAA0.620819
Voxel #26GaussianCho/Cre0.812873Cho/NAA0.593714
Voxel #27GaussianCho/Cre0.764973Cho/NAA0.614783
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #28GaussianCho/Cre0.693088Cho/NAA0-643046
Voxel #29GaussianCho/Cre0.820805Cho/NAA0.541781
Voxel #30GaussianCho/Cre0.863645Cho/NAA0.615628
Voxel #31GaussianCho/Cre0.822132Cho/NAA0.615398
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #32GaussianCho/Cre0.863442Cho/NAA0.64706
Voxel #33GaussianCho/Cre0.829424Cho/NAA0.630388
Voxel #34GaussianCho/Cre0.826255Cho/NAA0.64566
Voxel #35GaussianCho/Cre0.838811Cho/NAA0.755696
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #36GaussianCho/Cre0.813257Cho/NAA0.524243
Voxel #37GaussianCho/Cre0.883596Cho/NAA0.565531
Voxel #38GaussianCho/Cre0.895173Cho/NAA0.661893
Voxel #39GaussianCho/Cre0.915392Cho/NAA0.724875
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #40GaussianCho/Cre0.933848Cho/NAA0.707293
Voxel #41GaussianCho/Cre0.877934Cho/NAA0.739058
Voxel #42GaussianCho/Cre0.89324Cho/NAA0.83322
Voxel #43GaussianCho/Cre0.620034Cho/NAA0.399859
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #44GaussianCho/Cre0.77063Cho/NAA0.522992
Voxel #45GaussianCho/Cre0.77063Cho/NAA0.529867
Voxel #46GaussianCho/Cre0.92655Cho/NAA0.663082
Voxel #47GaussianCho/Cre0.903481Cho/NAA0.627585
-
Metabolite Ratios by Gaussian function
Voxel #48GaussianCho/Cre0.879797Cho/NAA0.644314
Voxel #49GaussianCho/Cre0.659546Cho/NAA0.601717
-
Conclusion:All the data reveals that the Gaussian Function is the best fit for MagneticResonance Spectroscopy.Suggestions are welcome