biological studies of tabanus abactor philip texas …

106
BIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF TABANUS ABACTOR PHILIP AND OTHER TABANIDAE OF THE TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS by SCOTT RUSH KINGSTON, B.A. A THESIS IN ENTOMOLOGY Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved Accepted August, 1983

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

BIOLOGICAL STUDIES OF TABANUS ABACTOR PHILIP

AND OTHER TABANIDAE OF THE

TEXAS ROLLING PLAINS

by

SCOTT RUSH KINGSTON, B.A.

A THESIS

IN

ENTOMOLOGY

Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of Texas Tech University in

Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for

the Degree of

MASTER OF SCIENCE

Approved

Accepted

August, 1983

l^^-''' ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank Dr. James Wangberg, chairman of my

committee, for his direction and guidance of this research

project and critical thesis review. To Dr. Oscar Francke

and Dr. J. M. Hellman I extend my deepest appreciation for

serving on my committee, their helpful advice, and for

reviewing this thesis. To Dr. Darryl P. Sanders (former

committee chairman) whose enthusiasm and interest made this

project possible I am indebted.

I am grateful to Dr. James Goodwin for his advice on

tabanid larvae, to Dr. L. L. Pechuman for identification of

adult tabanids, to Laurie Robbins for her plant identifica­

tions, to Dr. Herb Teskey for identification of tabanid lar­

vae, and to Dr. Russell Wright for identification of emerged

tabanid adults.

I am also grateful to Mr. Bill Masterson of the Masterson

Ranch, Mr. Wendel Kent of the Wight Ranch, Mr. Gad Garland

of the Garland farm, and Mr. Kermit Waters of the Waters

Ranch, whose personal cooperation, understanding, and facil­

ities, have made this research possible.

I owe special thanks to my summer assistant Mrs. Michele

Thomas for her invaluable aid both in the field and in the

lab.

11

I wish to extend my gratitude to Mr. Luke Celantano and

Mr. Dennis Edwards for their computer advice, to Mr. James

Cokendolpher for his technical advice and assistance, and to

Mrs. Mary Peek for her secretarial assistance.

Special thanks are due to Mrs. Ann Busenitz, Miss Halah

Nagati, and Mr. William Rogers for their assistance in the

field. I am also grateful to Miss Tarn Garland for her help

with the survey of tabanids. Thanks are also due to Miss

Lori Barnes, Mr. Steve Denning, Mr. Jay Lindley, Mr. Emmett

Schuster, and Miss Paula Verden for their day in the field.

To my parents, brother, and sisters for their love,

encouragement, understanding, and support, I wish to extend

my deepest appreciation.

This research was conducted through facilities and finan­

cial resources provided by Texas Tech University. To this

institution I am indebted.

Ill

TABLE OF CONTENTS

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ii

ABSTRACT v

LIST OF TABLES vi

LIST OF FIGURES vii

I. INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW 1

Distribution 2

Biology 4

Economic Importance 9

Control 15

Objectives 19

II. METHODS AND MATERIALS 20

Study Areas 20

General Survey 25

Biological Studies of Tabanus abactor . . . 36

III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION U6

General Survey 46

Nighttime Habitats 71

Larval Collections 81

IV. CONCLUSIONS 87

LITERATURE CITED 89

IV

ABSTRACT

The cedar fly, Tabanus abactor Philip, is a common cattle

pest in the Rolling Plains region of Texas. Research was

conducted to learn more about the biology and distributon of

J. abactor and other Texas Tabanidae. Fifteen different

species of tabanids were collected from Childress, Wichita,

Nolan, and King counties. The Cedar fly, I. abactor, was

the predominant fly species throughout this region. The

species number and diversity were found to vary with the

topography of the site. Nighttime habits and habitats of

the Cedar fly were investigated. Adult females were found

to prefer low lying areas and large vegetation types for

nighttime resting sites. Tabanid larvae (possibly T_, abac­

tor) were found in stream bottoms and other areas frequented

by the adults at night. Descriptions of the larvae and pos­

sible developmental sites of T. abactor are included.

v

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE

1. Number of observations, Mean, and Standard Deviation of Tabanidae collected at five sites in the Rolling Plains of Texas during the summer of 1982 48

2. Tabanidae collected in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982, including the frequency, number, and period of occurrence of each species collected 55

3. Average yearly temperature and cumulative rainfall of the four trapping locations in the Texas Rolling Plains 66

4. Tabanid larvae collected on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas, Summer 1982 and Spring 1983, including number, size range, and site description for larvae on each collection date 82

VI

LIST OF FIGURES

1. The Cedar Fly: Tabanus abactor Philip (female) 5

2. Map of Texas illustrating the Rolling Plains Region 21

3. Research locations in the Rolling Plains of Texas 23

4. Modified Manitoba trap used in surveying tabanids of the Texas Rolling Plains during the summer of 1982 26

5. Modified Malaise trap with cyanide jar at apex as the killing mechanism used for surveying tabanids not attracted to the Manitoba traps in the Texas Rolling Plains during the summer of 1982 27

6. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap on the Masterson Ranch 29

7. Type of water source and topography nearest the Malaise trap on the Masterson Ranch 30

8. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap at the Burkburnett site 31

9. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap at the Sweetwater site 32

10. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap at the Childress site 33

11. Materials used to study the nighttime habits and habitats of Tabanus abactor at the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Tx. during the summer of 1982 38

12. Nighttime habitat study release site A (Valley) 41

13. Nighttime habitat study release site B (Hilltop) 42

vii

14.

15.

16.

Frequency and percent of Tabanidae collected at five trapping locations in the Rolling Plains region of Texas from May 14 to November 21, 1982. . .

Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap at Burkburnett, Texas from May 17 to November 21, 1982

Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap at Childress, Texas from May 27 to November 6, 1982

47

49

50

17. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas from May 14 to November 13, 1982 51

18. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Malaise trap on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas from May 14 to November 13, 1982 52

19. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap at Sweetwater, Texas from May 28 to November 21, 1982 53

20. Seasonal occurence of Chrysops pikei in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982 57

21 . Seasonal occurrence of Tabanus abactor in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982 58

22. Seasonal occurrence of Tabanus subsimilis subsimilis in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982 59

23. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at the Masterson Ranch, King Co., Texas, Summer 1982, by Manitoba trap without CO2 61

Vlll

24. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at Sweetwater, Texas, Summer 1982 by Manitoba trap with and without CO2 62

25. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at Childress, Texas, by Manitoba trap and at the Masterson Ranch by Malaise trap, Summer 1982, with and without CO2 63

26. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at Burkburnett, Texas, Summer 1982 by Manitoba trap with and without CO2 64

27. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at Burkburnett, Childress, and Sweetwater, Texas, Summer 1982, using Manitoba traps with dry ice as an added attractant 69

28. Frequency and percent of tabanid species collected at Burkburnett, Childress, and Sweetwater, Texas, Summer 1982, using Manitoba traps without dry ice 70

29. Painted T. abactor flies under U.V. light. Fluorescent orange was the preferred color 72

30. Direction of flight of marked Tabanus abactor females from the point of release at both sites used in nighttime habitat study; Site A = Valley site, Site B = hilltop 74

31. Frequency and percent of Tabanus abactor females located at night on different vegetation and substrates at both site A and B 76

ix

32. Spatial distribution (height from the ground) of Tabanus abactor females located on vegetation at night at site A and B 78

33. Geographical preference of Tabanus abactor females at night within the Texas Rolling Plains 80

34. Larvae of unidentified Tabanus spp. (possibly T. abactor) collected from both typical and atypical tabanid habitats at the Masterson Ranch, King Co., Texas, Summer 1982 and Spring 1983 83

35. Tabanus larva (probably T. s. subsimilis) collected from manure pa^ aT the Masterson Ranch, King Co., Texas, April 30, 1983. 85

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Tabanidae: deer flies, horse flies, and green heads are

a widely diverse and important, group of insects (Curran,

1966). Nearly three hundred species of tabanids occur in

North America and the family as a whole consists of more

blood feeding species than any other dipteran family (Borror

et al., 1976). Tabanids are common pests of livestock

throughout the United States. Adult females are obligatory

blood feeding ectoparasites and are often serious pests of

livestock and humans. Tabanids are associated with large

economic losses in livestock. Damage is incurred through

loss of blood, loss of feeding time, and transmission of

diseases in these animals. The damage these Diptera cause

is enhanced even further by the additive effects of these

factors. Loss of blood, both during and after feeding, can

be severe due to the large wounds which are produced.

Tabanus abactor Philip is the most abundant horse fly

pest in the Rolling Plains region of Texas (Davis and San­

ders, 1981) and also the most important tabanid infesting

Oklahoma (Schomberg and Howell, 1955). It is commonly

referred to as the cedar fly by ranchers in the Rolling

Plains due to its assumed association with cedars, properly

redberry junipers, Juniperus pinchottii Sudw. It is a

severe pest in this region, with large populations present

during most summers. Weight losses in range cattle due to

attacks from J. abactor have been estimated to be as high as

90 kg (200 lbs) per head per season during heavy fly attacks

(Davis, 1979).

In spite of its economic importance very little is known

about the biology of T_. abactor. The ovipositional and

developmental sites have not been determined. Some authors

(Davis, 1979; Schomberg and Howell, 1955), consider that

larval development is atypical for a tabanid, with develop­

ment occurring in xeric habitats. Control methods have

proven ineffective against T. abactor. Information on the

biology, distribution, and habitats are needed in order to

develop new and effective control methods against this spec­

ies .

Distribution

Tabanids are distributed throughout the United States,

being more prevalent along coastal areas (salt marshes) and

wet semi-tropical regions than elswhere. Distributional

studies of Tabanidae in Texas have been mostly limited to

the eastern portion of the state. Thompson (1973a, 1973b,

1974a, 1974b, and 1976) and Thompson et al. (1977) deter­

mined the distribution of several tabanid species of eastern

Texas. Twenty species were reported from the Coastal

Marshes region, 29 from the Pine Belt regions, and 25 from

the Post Oak and Coastal Prairies regions of Texas. The

Rolling Plains region was not included in this study. Sev­

eral variations among the species found at these geographi­

cally different sites were mentioned and described. Tabanus

abactor was not present at any of these eastern Texas loca­

tions. McGregor and Schomberg (1952) provided a partial

annotated list of tabanids which were collected in areas of

severe outbreaks in Texas. All species were collected in

the eastern portions of the state except T_. abactor and T.

dorsifer Walk., which were collected only in western Texas.

Fasten et al. (1968) surveyed tabanids near three towns in

western Texas (Brackettville, Marfa, and Presidio). Large

numbers of T. abactor were collected from the Brackettville

site, but none were found at either of the other two sites.

Davis and Sanders (1981) collected six species of tabanids

from 62 counties in the Rolling Plains region of Texas.

Tabanus abactor was by far the most numerous and was present

in 46 of the 62 counties surveyed. Other species, Silvius

quadrivittatus (Say) and Tabanus subsimilis (Bellardi), were

also found in large numbers throughout this region. There

are probably more species present in the Rolling Plains than

the six reported by Davis and Sanders (1981) because col­

lecting was terminated once the cedar fly was captured.

Biology

Development in most tabanid species is univoltine and

aquatic. Several authors have described the morphology

and biology of tabanids (Hansens, 1979; Pechuman, 1981;

Schwardt, 1936; Stone, 1930; Tashiro and Schwardt, 1949,

1953). Teskey (1969) provides a good coverage of the bio­

nomics of the larvae of North American tabanids. Very lit­

tle is known about the biology of T. abactor, especially

concerning development.

Tabanus abactor was first described from adults collected

in Eastland, Texas (Philip, 1936). Tabanus abactor is a

fairly large, robust tabanid, measuring ca. 14 mm (1/2 in)

in length. The eyes of the females are separated, as in

most tabanids, and have two green bands traversing them hor­

izontally. Eyes of males are contiguous and contain only

one horizontal band. This species is easily distinguished

from other tabanids due to the three parallel rows of trian­

gles along the length of the dorsum of the abdomen (one tri­

plet per abdominal segment) and a faint spot at the furca­

tion (branching) of wing vein R4+5 (Figure 1).

y^-.-i;-'

Figure 1. The Cedar Fly: Tabanus abactor Philip (female)

Most tabanids are aquatic or semi-aquatic in breeding

habits. Oviposition normally occurs in layered masses on

vegetation or on exposed objects in or around streams and

ponds, or in damp soil (Pechuman, 1981; Stone, 1930). Egg

masses vary in size from 100 to 800 eggs per mass. They may

be composed of one layer, as in Chrysops species or of sev­

eral layers, as in most Tabanus species (Stone, 1930). The

masses are whitish in coloration when freshly deposited,

rapidly darkening to various shades of brown or black (Kahn,

1952; Pechuman, 1981). Incubation periods vary greatly in

different climates, usually requiring from five to seven

days.

The only egg masses reported of T. abactor were those

produced by caged adults (Schomberg and Howell, 1955).

These eggs, rather than being deposited on leaves or twigs

in cages, were found on the cage floor. They were greyish

in color and in loose double tiered masses. Egg masses con­

tained from 40 to 175 eggs, with a mean of 93 eggs per mass.

Incubation of these eggs lasted six days.

The recognition of tabanid larvae is often difficult due

to the lack of useful keys to the immature stages. Teskey

(1969) has provided the most comprehensive and useful cover­

age of tabanid larvae, covering not only species descrip-

tions but also life histories for 81 species. Schwardt

(1931) described several tabanid larvae of Arkansas. Rob­

erts and Dicke (1964) described the immatures of several

species and constructed a key to the immatures of Nearctic

tabanids.

Upon eclosion larvae migrate to the substrate or water to

complete development (Pechuman, 1981). The development of

most species occurs under moist conditions. Common larval

habitats include salt marshes, drainage ditches, and along

the banks of streams or ponds. Some species develop in

moist leaf litter or rotting logs (Pechuman, 1981; Stone,

1930). Others, such as Tabanus sulcifrons (Macquart), have

been reported to develop in areas totally devoid of moisture

(Schomberg, 1952). Wilson (1969) also noted xeric habitats

for T. sulcifrons, Tabanus fusciostatus Hine, and T. lineola

Fab. Each was collected from the dry substrate of a forest

floor. According to Schomberg and Howell (1955), Tabanus

equalis Hine and T. abactor larvae can develop in soil and

under leaves or short grasses in dry shady areas where water

does not accumulate.

Most larvae are carnivorous, preying upon any number of

worms, crustaceans, or insect larvae found in the substrate.

Some species have been found to be saprophagous, feeding

upon decaying organic matter in the soil.

8

Larval development may last from several months to sev­

eral years (Stone, 1930). Tabanids are known to overwinter

only in the larval stage (Pechuman, 1981). The mature lar­

vae, when preparing to pupate, move to drier soil usually

just under the soil surface (James and Harwood, 1969; Stone,

1930).

Larval development of !_. abactor is poorly understood.

Schomberg and Howell (1955) reported on 12 larvae suspected

to be T. abactor in Oaklahoma and Texas. Those found in

Oklahoma were collected from dry, grass-covered soil under a

chittimwood tree, Bumelia longinosa (Michx) Pets, where

standing water would never be found. Four larvae from Texas

were found in very dry leaf-covered soil beneath a blackjack

oak, (Quercus marilandica Muench). This was also a xeric

habitat. The larvae were described only as being white with

no typical tabanid markings. They were also described as

"lazy and sluggish" in habits compared to other Tabanus

species. Larval length was 6 mm in October, and 22 mm by

pupation the following July.

The pupal stage in tabanids lasts from one to three weeks

depending on the species and temperature. According to

Schomberg and Howell (1955) T. abactor pupation occurs

beneath the substrate and lasts 10 days. Adults emerge

through a slit on the dorsum of the pupal case. The wings

are then unfolded to dry; and after a short resting period,

flight and feeding begins. Most species are univoltine, but

some such as T. subsimilis Bellardi are multivoltine, and

others such as T. calens L. require two years to develop

(Schwardt, 1936). Schomberg and Howell (1955) suggest that

egg and larval evidence indicates T. abactor to be univol­

tine .

Economic Importance

Female tabanids are notorious telmophagous (pooled blood

feeding) pests of livestock and other mammals including

humans. The females have blade-like mouthparts in which the

mandibles and maxillae act as scissors, slicing open the

skin. This action usually results in the rupturing of many

small blood vessels and provides a pool of blood on which to

feed. The blood is then sponged up with the modified

labella. Males lack mandibles and do not feed on blood.

They apparently rely upon nectar and other vegetational

juices for nutrition (Pechuman, 1981). Most females are

anautogenous, requiring a blood meal for oogenesis. Some

Tabanus and Chrysops species are autogenous, the females

being able to oviposit without a blood meal. Sugars from

nectar sources and extrafloral nectaries have been shown to

10

be important constituents in the diets of males and females

for normal behavior (Bosler and Hansens, 1974; Hocking,

1953; Kniepert, 1980; Magnarelli and Anderson, 1981; Magnar-

elli et al., 1979). Some sugars may even be converted to

and deposited as yolk during early oocyte development (Knie­

pert, 1980). Supplemental carbohydrate sources probably

play only a small role in oogenesis and vitellogenesis in

anautogenous species with the ingested blood providing most

of these nutrients (Magnarelli and Anderson, 1981).

Blood feeding occurs mostly during the day. Most species

feed from late afternoon to dark (Hollander and Wright,

1980a). According to Hollander and Wright (1980a) T. abac­

tor usually feeds between 3 and 9 pm CDT, with feeding rap­

idly decreasing one hour after sunset. Feeding by T. abac-

tor was reported by Hollander and Wright (1980b) to occur

54% more often around the legs than elsewhere on tethered

cattle. The underline and udder also were preferred feeding

sites. Tabanids requiring a blood meal for oogenesis have

been reported to seek a host every four or five days (Hol­

lander and Wright, 1980b). Estimates of blood loss from

horse flies vary considerably among species and observers.

Blood meal sizes range from .08cc to .647cc in different

species (Hollander and Wright, 1980b; Tashiro and Schwardt,

1953). Total daily blood losses range from 59 to 300 cc/an-

11

imal/day (Hollander and Wright, 1980b; Philip, 1931; Tashiro

and Schwardt, 1953; Web and Wells, 1924). Tabanus abactor

was shown by Hollander and Wright (1980b) to imbibe as much

as three times its own weight in blood in a single feeding.

Hollander and Wright (1980b) determined this intake to be

.140 cc/fly/blood meal. The blood that is ingested by the

fly only accounts for part of the total blood loss of the

animal. Exsanguination may account for more blood loss than

that which is actually imbibed (Sanders, pers. comm.). Sec­

ondary bacterial infections and parasitism (screwworms) may

also occur in these wounds.

Tabanus abactor also causes much irritation during feed­

ing. According to Hollander and Wright (1980b), only ^5% of

T. abactor females feed to completion due to the severe pain

that they elicit during this activity. Irritation due to

the biting and buzzing of these flies also contributes to

economic losses in livestock. Annoyance from these flies

may even cause heavier losses in weight gains than those due

to blood loss. Livestock will often stop grazing and con­

gregate during peak tabanid feeding periods in an effort to

avoid the feeding of these flies. Peak tabanid feeding

periods correspond with peak grazing periods causing loss of

valuable feeding time (Webb and Wells, 1924). The animals

often inflict injury upon each other by kicking or horning

12

one another in attempting to repel these flies. Secondary

infections may also result in these wounds.

Livestock production losses due to tabanid feeding and

irritation have often been reported. Steelman (1976) stated

that in 1965 over $40,000,000 was lost due to tabanid

attacks on cattle. Decreased weight gains and decreased

milk production accounted for this loss ($30,000,000 and

$10,000,000 respectively). Steelman (1976) and Roberts and

Pund (1974) reported that weight gains steadily increased as

horse fly numbers decreased. According to Davis (1979), as

much as 90 kg (200 lbs)/animal/season can be lost in range

animal weight gains because of T. abactor.

Milk production is also hindered by high infestations of

horse flies. Decreased feeding time, loss of energy due to

irritation, and blood loss contribute to substantial losses

to the dairy industry. Milk production losses have been

reported as high as 100% during three weeks of constant

exposure to feeding horse flies (Steelman, 1976). Granett

and Hansens (1956, 1957) reported that milk production would

increase after horse fly and stable fly control. Milk qual­

ity is also affected by tabanids; butterfat production can

be reduced as much as 14.8% (Bruce and Decker, 1951).

Decreases in milk quantity and quality, especially in summer

13

during high tabanid activity, may also affect the newborn

calves of dairy and beef cattle. Their growth may be

stunted and their resistance to disease and stress

decreased.

Tabanids may also be important bacterial, viral, and pro­

tozoan vectors (Krinskey, 1976). The likelihood of disease

transmission is increased due to the repeated biting by

tabanids.

Horse flies are- responsible for the transmission of two

major viral diseases of livestock, hog cholera virus and

equine infectious anemia virus. Hog cholera virus is the

causitive agent of swine fever in hogs: a very acute, con­

tagious disease that often results in death. According to

Tidwell et al. (1972), hog cholera virus is transmitted by

Tabanus quinquevittatus (Wiedeman), T. lineola (Fabricius),

and possibly three other species. Equine infectious anemia

virus is transmitted physically by the bites of horse flies

and other blood sucking Diptera (Hawkins et al., 1976; Issel

and Coggins, 1979; and Kemen, 1977). The disease is often

referred to as swamp fever due to its high prevalence around

swampy areas where tabanids may develop. It is a serious

chronic disease of horses and other Equidae, causing debili­

tation and death in severe cases. Horse flies are particu-

14

larly a problem in eradication efforts because carrier

horses, those which elicit no visible symptoms but remain

viremic, spread the virus to healthy animals.

Bacterial diseases transmitted by tabanids are also a

major cause of loss to the livestock industry. Bacillus

anthracic (Cahn), the causitive agent of anthrax, is a

highly fatal disease of cattle and is transmitted by several

species of tabanids (Krinskey, 1976). Anthrax can be dis­

seminated in a number of different ways other than by biting

flies, and the role that horse flies play in transmission is

not fully understood. Anaplasmosis, a disease caused by a

protozoan-like organism, Anaplasma marginale (Theiler), has

also been shown to be transmitted by tabanids. Anaplasmosis

is a disease which causes a severe anemic condition in cat­

tle. Mortality rates have been recorded to be as high as

50% in severe outbreaks. Those animals that survive become

permanent carriers of the organism, thereby perpetuating the

disease. According to Steelman (1976) economic losses

between the years 1951 and I960 totaled $9,004,000 due to

mortality and $26,997,000 due to morbidity. Transmission is

almost totally arthropod dependent. Tabanus abactor, along

with several other tabanids, has been shown to transmit ana­

plasmosis (Dikmans, 1950; Sanborn et al., 1932; Wilson et

al., 1963; Wilson and Myer, 1966).

15

Disease agents transmitted by Tabanidae are most often

carried physically from one host to another on the fly's

mouthparts. Some biological transmission occurs in certain

Chrysops species. In addition some deer flies also act as

intermediate hosts of helminths that can later cause disease

in livestock (Krinskey, 1976). Chrysops species provide the

only known means of transmission of the eye worm, Loa lea

(Guyot) in western Africa. The arterial worm Eloephora

schneideri Wehr and Dikmans is an important helminth attack­

ing sheep and mule deer in southwestern portions of the

United States and has also been shown to be transmitted

biologically by tabanids. Tabanus abactor has not been

shown to be a biological carrier of any disease agent; how­

ever, inadequate research has been conducted on its role as

a disease vector.

Control

Control of tabanids is very difficult due to the hardi­

ness of the adults and the general lack of biological infor­

mation on them. The adult female is somewhat resistant to »

insecticides and spends little time actually on the host,

thus decreasing the effective time period for chemical expo­

sure (Brown and Lancaster, 1973). Varied larval habitats

and developmental time periods also complicate control

efforts.

16

Area broadcast of insecticides for adult and larval con­

trol has met with little success. Historically, attempts at

using aerial applications with Lindane and DDT provided lim­

ited control (Lindquist and Knipling, 1957). Control was

achieved only in open areas and little residual control was

obtained with DDT. Control of larvae in saltmarshes using

5% Dieldrin applied aerially was reported by Hansens (1956).

Larvae were eliminated from the marshes for two years post-

treatment; however, serious injury to other animal life in

the marsh accompanied this control. Synthetic pyrethroids

with short residual properties seem to be the most promising

types of insecticides for area wide control. According to

Hansens (1981) Resmethrin and Permethrin applied in ULV for­

mulations are effective for controlling adult populations of

the deer fly Chrysops atlanticus Pechuman. However, control

is often only short term, sometimes just one or two days.

Practical and effective repellents for protection of

range animals against biting horse flies have not yet been

developed. Unfortunately, Stirofos-impregnated ear tags,

which are so useful in the control of horn flies and other

muscids, have no effect against •tabanids (Wilson et al.,

1978). Some protection can be obtained for dairy and feed-

lot animals by the use of mosquito repellents (Blume et al.,

1971). Repellents are impractical for use on range animals

17

because of their expense and the necessity of repeated

treatments.

Insecticides applied directly to livestock are not

totally effective either. Many chemicals such as Malathion

and Diazinon are effective for short durations against these

flies but provide little or no long term relief. Synthetic

pyrethroids, such as Permethrin, provide a longer residual

affect and can reduce fly populations for as long as two and

a half weeks (Bay et al., 1976).

Some non-chemical tactics have been attempted for tabanid

control. The Manitoba trap has reduced deer fly populations

in certain areas (Pechuman, 1981). According to Hansens

(1979) the use of such traps may decrease populations to a

tolerable level but elimination of the problem is not

achieved. Temporary impoundment of waterways, such as salt

marshes and streams, have been shown by Anderson and Kneen

(1969) to be an effective measure for eliminating deer fly

immature stages. This method is useful in certain habitats

against some species but it is too expensive and time con­

suming when used on a large scale.

There are several natural enemies of tabanids some of

which may be useful in biological control (Pechuman, 1981).

Adults are preyed upon by dragonflies (Odonata), robber

18

flies (Asilidae), and wasps (Vespidae) of various genera

(Pechuman, 1981). Some sarcophagid larvae, Machronychia

spp. (near aurata, Coquillett) have been found to parasitize

tabanid adults (Thompson and Love, 1979). Thompson (1978)

and Thompson and Love (1979) suggest that the prospects of

rearing this species as a biocontrol agent of horse flies

are encouraging. Larvae and pupae are parasitized by both

dipterous and hymenopterous parasites, but these parasites

have little overall impact on.adult populations (Thompson et

al., 1980; Pechuman, 1981). Egg parasitism is common in

tabanids and often the percentage of parasitized eggs is

very high. Egg parasitism in Texas Tabanidae may be as high

as 97% (Parman, 1928). Trichogrammatidae and Scelionidae

(Hymenoptera) are found commonly parasitising tabanid eggs

(Pechuman, 1981). The potential for control of tabanids

using these insects exists; however, little research has been

conducted to determine the overall impact on populations and

feasibility of such a project in the field. More informa­

tion on the oviposition sites, larval developmental sites,

and behavior of T. abactor is needed. Such knowledge may

aid in the development of a practical control strategy.

19

Objectives

The four objectives of this study were: (1) to survey

the tabanids of the Rolling Plains region of Texas, (2) to

determine developmental site(s) for T. abactor and other

tabanid species, (3) to investigate the nocturnal habits and

habitats of T_, abactor, and (4) to determine the location

and duration of larval development in T. abactor.

Davis and Sanders (1981) conducted a partial survey in

the Rolling Plains but a comprehensive survey has not been

completed. My survey was initiated in an effort to deter­

mine what other species are present in addition to T. abac­

tor within this area and to note the economic impact these

flies may have on the area cattle industry. Information on

interspecific competition between tabanids present was also

sought during this study. The nighttime habits and habitats

of T. abactor were studied to determine oviposition and

other behavior patterns that may have significance for con­

trol. Descriptions of larvae and life cycle of T. abactor

given by Schomberg and Howell (1955) are inconclusive. Ade­

quate descriptions of the larvae and life cycle of T. abac­

tor are necessary if control methods aimed at the larval

stage are to be initiated.

CHAPTER II

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Study Areas

The Rolling Plains of Texas, as described by Correl and

Johnston (1979), is an area of approximately 9,600,000 hec­

tares (24,000,000 acres) of gently rolling to moderately

rough plains topography, (Figure 2). It is dissected by

numerous intermittent stream valleys flowing easterly to

southeasterly. Approximately 66% of this area is primarily

used for the grazing of cattle. The elevation ranges from

240 to 900 meters, with the soils varying from coarse sands

along streams to tight clays or red-bed clays and shales.

The annual rainfall ranges from about 56 cm. in the west to

almost 76 cm. in the east. May and September are normally

the high rainfall months, with a summer dry period and high

evaporation rates typical during most seasons. The vegeta­

tion is dominated by range grasses, such as tabosa (Hilaria

mutica, Buckl.) and others, with honey mesquite, (Prosopis

glandulosa Torrey), junipers (Juniperus spp.) and other

tree species. Weed species such as broomweed (Gutierrezia

spp.) and sandburs (Cenchrus spp.) are also common invaders

due to overgrazing.

20

21

^^•^^^^^r rr;:^^-rP5isr:

Figure 2. Map of Texas illustrating the Rolling Plains Region (lighter portion).

22

Research began in the summer of 1982 and was conducted on

four ranches in four Rolling Plains counties: King, Chil­

dress, Wichita, and Nolan, Texas (Figure 3). All four coun­

ties and ranches were included in the survey. Biological

investigations of T. abactor were limited to the Masterson

Ranch in King Co., Tx.

Trapping Locations

The central trapping site was located on the Masterson

Ranch ca. 24 km (15 mi) northeast of Guthrie, Tx. It occu­

pies an area of over 12,000 hectares (30,000 acres) with the

dominant vegetation including range grasses, redberry juni­

pers (Juniperus pinchottii Sudw.), and some honey mesquite

( . glandulosa) . The overall topography is very rugged to

moderately hilly, with numerous intermittent stream valleys.

The south fork of the Wichita River flows through the south­

ern part of the ranch, and it along with several man-made

watering tanks and troughs provide water for the cattle

grazing on the ranch.

The second trapping location was the Kermit Waters Ranch

ca. 96 km (60 mi) north of the Masterson site. This ranch

encompassed ca. 3,200 hectares (8,000 acres) ca. 8.8 km (5.5

mi) northeast of Childress, in Childress Co., Texas. It is

much less rugged with gently rolling hills and few intermit-

23

Figure 3- Research locations in the Rolling Plains of Texas.

^ = Masterson Ranch, King Co., Tx. • = Waters Ranch, Childress Co., Tx.

= Garland Farm, Wichita Co., Tx. = Wight Ranch, Nolan Co., Tx.

24

tent streams. Some water tanks occur on this ranch also,

most of which are fed by wells rather than by streams. The

vegetation consists of various grasses and honey mesquite

(_P. glandulosa) . Junipers do not occur at this site.

The third trapping location was on the Gad Garland farm,

ca. 8 km. (5 mi) east of Burkburnett, in Wichita Co., Texas,

This site is on the far eastern edge of the Rolling Plains

and is relatively flat with only a few gently rolling hills.

It was the most open of all the sites with grassy meadows,

bordered by wheat and cotton fields. A few large trees

occur along the edges of a nearby stream.

The fourth study area was ca. 11.2 km. (7 mi) southeast

of Sweetwater on the Wight Ranch in Nolan Co., Texas. The

Wight Ranch consists of ca. 960 ha. (2,400 acres) of gently

rolling to rough terrain. This area most closely resembles

that of the Masterson Ranch, but is less rugged. The pre­

dominant vegetation is also similar to the Masterson Ranch.

Running streams and man-made stocktanks are present as water

sources.

25

General Survey

Flies were collected at each locality by the use of modi­

fied Manitoba traps designed by Thorsteinson et al. (1964),

modified by Davis and Sanders (1981) (Figure 4). A large

35.56 cm (14 in) copper float was painted glossy black and

hung in the center of the trap as an attractant due to the

positive tropism of Tabanids toward dark moving objects

(Bracken et al. , 1962; Ezell, 1973; Granger, 1970; Hansens,

1947; and Thompson, 1969). Cyanide kill jars were con­

structed and placed at the end of the wire cone as the kill­

ing mechanism. In addition, one 17 ft. Malaise trap (Bio-

quip model 2875A), was also used at the Masterson Ranch, to

capture those species not attracted to the Manitoba trap

(Roberts, 1972; and Steyskal, 1981). The Malaise trap was

modified from its original design by the addition of an

inverted cyanide kill jar at the trap apex (Figure 5).

Henceforth the Manitoba trap and the Malaise trap on the

Masterson Ranch are termed the 'Masterson site' and the 'Ma­

laise site' respectively in all figures and discussion.

Manitoba traps were placed on the Masterson Ranch, Burk­

burnett site, Childress site, and on the Sweetwater site on

May 14, May 17, May 27, and May 28, 1982, respectively. The

Malaise trap was placed on the Masterson Ranch on May 21 ,

1982.

26

Figure 4. Modified Manitoba trap used in surveying tabanids of the Texas Rolling Plains during the summer of 1982.

27

0 '

-'».>ijr

Figure 5. Modified Malaise trap with cyanide jar at apex as the killing mechanism used for surveying tabanids not attracted to the Manitoba traps in the Texas Rolling Plains during the summer of 1982.

28

Each trap was placed in close proximity to a water

source. The Manitoba trap at the Masterson Ranch was con­

structed on the site which corresponded to Davis' (1979)

northeast location. An open valley was to the east of the

trap with the breastwork of a large watertank to the west

(Figure 6). The Malaise trap was placed on the southeast

portion of the ranch near the south fork of the Wichita

River. It was constructed between dense vegetation on one

side and a large cliff on the other which could constitute a

flyway for various Diptera (Figure 7). The Manitoba trap at

Burkburnett was located adjacent to a stream (Gilbert creek)

in an open field (Figure 8). The trap at Sweetwater was

situated ca. 20 meters south of a stream that fed a large

water tank ca. 100 meters from the trap (Figure 9). The

Childress trap was ca. 300 meters west of a large spring fed

watering tank (Figure 10).

Exclosures were constructed at each site except for the

Burkburnett site where an existing corral kept the horses

out. A three strand barbed wire fence (ca. 5 sq.m.) was

constructed around each of the other traps, including the

Malaise trap, to protect livestock from the cyanide.

According to Joyce and Hansens (1968), Tabanidae are

reported to fly 0.3 to 0.9 m (1-3 ft.) above the surface of

the ground when searching for a blood meal. Therefore, the

29

Figure 6. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap on the Masterson Ranch.

30

t i| fciEi 1 Ig 1 1 II . . ^ ^

^::T*^im-!^ '.•9.:,^* ' ^ •~%L ty^'^ i. ^ •'"• • ' x , .

BlmW/ii1^lm/.l

' i %

•^^»t^ " \

r.»lB Vl^-'. «'-,.«:-. J,

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ • » ^ t ^

' ••" •' l l \ ~??^>s

^••''jir'k

•_rjjj^ ,

P m 9 '^BH

'>•. •.

• ^ - - - •

\

. ,

Figure 7. Type of water source and topography nearest the Malaise trap on the Masterson Ranch.

31

^

Figure 8. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap at the Burkburnett site.

32

Figure 9. Type of water source and topography nearest the Manitoba trap at the Sweetwater site.

33

'.% -

Figure 10 Type of water source Manitoba trap at the

and topography Childress site

nearest the

34

base of the plexiglass portion of the trap and the equator

of the large black ball, used as an attractant, were kept

one meter from the substrate. The plexiglass and black ball

were kept clean throughout the summer to ensure continual

attraction to flies. Vegetation within the exclosures was

kept short to allow easy access and high visibility to the

flies.

Approximately 22.5 kg. of dry ice (50 lbs.) was added

every other week to the Manitoba traps at Childress and

Sweetwater in an effort to obtain a greater diversity and

density of flies (Blume et al., 1972; Hansens et al., 1971;

and Roberts, 1970). The efficiency of dry ice baited traps

versus non baited traps was also tested. Dry ice was used

at the Burkburnett site on June 17 and July 28 1982. The

use of dry ice was later discontinued at this site for prac­

tical reasons. Dry ice was placed in 3.5 cm thick styro-

foam coolers with perforated lids to allow carbon dioxide to

escape. Each container was placed under the black ball for

maximum effect.

Catches were removed weekly and cyanide jars replaced

when necessary. Flies at the Burkburnett site were not col­

lected as regularly due to the distance and time involved.

They were instead removed about once every two weeks. All

35

collected specimens were placed in a freezer for future pin­

ning and labelling.

Fly traps were removed from each site after the first

hard freeze (0 C or less for 2 or more days) and after two

consecutive weeks of empty traps. Traps were removed on 6

November 1982 at Childress, 13 November at the Masterson

Ranch (both Malaise and Manitoba traps), and 21 November at

Sweetwater and Burkburnett.

Representatives of each species captured were sent to Dr,

L. L. Pechuman at Cornell University, Ithaca, New York for

species determination. Species separation of collected

tabanids was sometimes difficult due to damage incurred to

them by other insects (mostly grasshopers) collected in the

traps. Unidentifiable specimens were removed from the sam­

ple and discarded.

The effectiveness of Malaise and Manitoba traps in col­

lecting tabanids was compared. The abundance, seasonal

occurrence, and date of peak populations of tabanids were

determined for each trapping location. The abundance and

period of occurrence of each species collected in the Roll­

ing Plains were also determined. The date for peak field

populations was determined for those collected most often

(n>5). A comparison among species of tabanids to the cli-

36

mate (U. S. Environmental Data Survice, 1981a, 1981b), geog­

raphy, and vegetation of each site was also conducted in an

effort to determine factors which may influence the species

composition at each site.

Biological Studies of

Tabanus abactor

Nighttime Habits and Habitats

The nighttime habits and habitats of T. abactor were

determined through a capture recapture technique. Flies

were collected, marked with fluorescent paint, and located

in the field after dark using a hand-held black light to

determine their location and behavior at night.

Collecting of adults was facilitated by the natural

attraction of T. abactor females to the sides and tires of a

light blue pickup truck while driving through the ranch at

16 to 32 kmh. (10 - 20 mph.). This attraction was due to

the truck's temperature, appearance, and movement. They were

then collected from the truck with an aerial net at various

locations on the ranch. During late summer, when fly num­

bers diminished, dry ice was added to the back of the pickup

under a camper shell as an additional attractant. The cam­

per shell was left open when driving and usually facing down

37

wind when the vehicle was not moving to attract more flies.

Flies were then collected from within the camper shell as

well as from other areas of the vehicle.

Flies were placed in 850 ml. ice cream containers with

four Kim Wipes © to lessen injury. The lids of the contain­

ers were punctured before being placed into an ice cooler to

slow the flies' movements and facilitate marking (Figure 11)

Containers were removed from the cooler within 0.5 hour and

the flies were then removed individually for painting. This

removal was simplified by the attachment of a funnel-like

device to the ice cream container lid after the center was

removed. The funnel was comprised of two screens; one of

rigid 2 mm. metal mesh, with an inner liner of softer plas­

tic mesh. These were constricted at the tip to allow only

one fly to exit at a time. The uppermost 2 cm. of a 50 ml.

(2.5 cm. diameter) plastic container with lid was attached

over this opening to further enable the release of only one

fly (Figure 11).

Many types of marking systems have been used for disper­

sion studies of tabanids, including radioactive isotopes,

colored chalks, reflective paints, and fluorescent powders

(Beesly and Crewe, 1963; Bennett and Smith, 1968; Eddy et

al., 1962; Fales et al., 1964; Sheppard et al., 1973, 1980;

38

Figure 11 Materials used to study the nighttime habits and habitats of Tabanus abactor at the Masterson Ranch in King Co. , TT'. during the summer of 1982.

39

Thornhill and Hays, 1972; and Turner and Gerhardt, 1965).

Fluorescent paints and powders were experimented with in

this study. A fluorescent powder (zinc oxide) from Ferro

Corporation was used after Sheppard et al. (1973, 1980) who

used a fluorescent powder. Day Glo (B), in determining flight

routes in Louisiana. Marking and relocation using zinc

oxide powder proved very efficient; however, flies marJced

with this material, often flew immediately to vegetation and

began removing it. The material may have been harmful to

the flies, altering their behavior. Different colors were

also not available, so for these reasons fluorescent powder

was not used in this study.

An effective marker was a water based fluorescent Crayola

R Poster Paint (NO. 116 Non-Toxic Crayola (B) ) . Although

Beesly and Crewe (1963) showed no detrimental reactions to

oil base paints on Chrysops silacea, water-based paints show

less potential for harm. They also wear off quicker allow­

ing the use of only a few colors and only one pattern as

compared to the complex patterns and color combinations used

by Beesly and Crewe in their studies. Six different colors

(fluorescent orange, green, pink, yellow, red, and blue)

were used to differentiate the various daily release sites

and dates (Figure 11).

40

Flies were hand painted with a drop of paint on the dor­

sum of the thorax using a small paint brush. Most flies

were held by the legs during painting, with the wings being

held for those flies attempting flight. Originally flies

were kept until evening to be released. This resulted in

high mortality rates. The release of flies after dusk

resulted in some healthy flies, but these flies would not

fly. Consequently flies were released immediately after

marking, taking note of the general direction of flight

(with or against the wind). Any individuals unable to fly

normally immediately after marking were removed from the

population.

Flies were collected and released between 3 and 8 pm CST

which is the peak of T_, abactor activity (Hollander and

Wright, 1980a). The release time was shifted slightly as

the season progressed to allow at least two hours of flight

time before sunset.

Two release sites were selected. The first site (site A)

was the low valley where the Manitoba trap was located (Fig­

ure 12). The second site (site B) was located on top of a

large mesa with a steep slope directly to the south and a

lesser sloped, but just as deep, valley to the north (Figure

13). There was heavy vegetation at the base of the southern

ravine where moisture was always present seeping from the

41

Figure 12. Nighttime habitat study release site A (Valley)

42

•^iif- %•

Figure 13. Nighttime habitat study release site B (Hilltop).

43

rocky ground. Large trees and an intermittent stream, where

standing water was sometimes present, were in the valley to

the north of this release site.

Marked J. abactor females were sought one hour after sun­

set using a hand held blacklight. A Safari ® light (Burgess

Batt Division UL © Model 165/3 Gould Inc. Pat. No. 204903)

was used with a GE F8T5 BLB black light bulb (Figure 11).

The vegetation and substrate of the immediate and surround­

ing areas of the release site were scanned as thoroghly as

possible for 2 - 3 hours each night, weather permitting.

Upon locating a fly, its position was marked with a red flag

for determining the flight distance the following day. The

vegetation on which it rested, the geographical location

(hill, sloped areas, or bottomland), height on the plant,

and habitat description (presence or absence of cover) were

noted. Congregation among flies was also recorded.

Larval Collections

The search for T. abactor larvae followed larval collect­

ing techniques similar to those of Philip (1928) and Freeman

and Hansens (1972). Larvae were collected from streams and

ponds with soil sieves of different sizes. U.S. Standard

Sieve Series No. 6 with an opening of 3.36 mm. was used most

often, providing an opening small enough to halt larval

44

escape and large enough to allow the removal of loose soil

that was agitated with water. In addition, some large lar­

vae were floated out during the sifting of soil with water.

These methods, although slow, were chosen over others due to

the increased possibility of success and the small amount of

damage the larvae would sustain during capture. Larval

searches were made in some atypical habitats for tabanids as

well, such as dry stream bottoms, around the base of vegeta­

tion, and in manure pads and soil. Larvae were searched for

in these habits by manually digging and sifting through the

substrate in the field.

Most of the collected larvae were brought back to the

laboratory for rearing. Four types of rearing containers

were used. The majority of the larvae were placed in 400

ml. beakers with 100 to 150 ml of the substrate (sand & mud)

in which they were collected. The substrate was kept moist

at all times. The second group of larvae were placed in

34x17x9 cm. plastic shoe boxes half filled with their sub­

strate at a slanting gradient from over half filled at the

upper end down to nothing at the lower'end. Water was

placed in these containers to maintain a constant moisture

gradient. Both types of containers were covered with perfo­

rated plastic lids. All larvae were maintained at room

temperature and lighting conditions. The food for the lar-

45

vae was initially blood worms (chironomid larvae) and other

organic material found in the substrate but on March 16,

1982, following the advise of Dr. James Goodwin, all remain­

ing larvae and any to be found later were fed beef liver

once a week. Two larvae were also placed into large glass

petri dishes of sand to facilitate observations at this time

as well. Some larvae were collected from atypical tabanid

habitats. These larvae were placed, with their natural sub­

strate, into 275 ml. (9 mm. dia. x 5 mm. deep) plastic con­

tainers with perforated lids. An attempt was made to main­

tain the moisture of the substrate at the same level as it

was in nature.

Some larvae were preserved immediately in 75/& ethyl alco­

hol after collecting for species identification. Represen­

tatives of these larvae were sent to Dr. H. J. Teskey at the

Biosystematics Research Institute in Canada for determina­

tion .

CHAPTER III

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

General Survey

A total of 6,584 tabanids were collected from four Mani­

toba traps and one Malaise trap in the study area. More

flies were collected by the Manitoba trap (x=79.5 +_ 256.7

S.D., n = 82) than were collected by the Malaise trap (x = 0.5 +_

1.61, n=19) which collected only nine flies, less than ^% of

the total (t=2.80, d.f.=8l, p<0.01). The most productive

trapping location was at the Masterson Ranch using the Mani­

toba trap. Although no dry ice was used as an attractant

source for the Masterson site, over 85% of the flies col­

lected during the survey were collected there (Figure 14).

Tabanids were collected in ever decreasing numbers at the

Sweetwater, Burkburnett, Childress, and Malaise sites

respectively (Figure 14). A significantly greater number of

flies were collected at the Masterson site than at any other

trapping location, using T tests at the 95% level of signif­

icance (Table 1).

Peak populations were noted on July 30, July 29, July 16,

June 28, and August 2, for the Burkburnett, Childress,

Malaise, Masterson, and Sweetwater sites, respectively (Fig­

ures 15-19). Those flies collected from Burkburnett, Chil­

dress, and Sweetwater reflected a tendency for population

46

47

SITE

MflLfllSE

MRSTERSON

CMILORESS

SWEETWATER

BURKBURNETT

FREO

5608

56

658

235

PERCENT

o.m

85. m

0.85

10.02

3.58

1 1 ' 1 1 1 1 ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' I ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ' 1 ' T - i - f - i - T 0 2000 4000 6000

FREQUENCr

Figure 14. Frequency and percent of Tabanidae collected at five trapping locations in the Rolling Plains region of Texas from May 14 to November 21, 1982.

48

Table 1. Number of observations. Mean, and Standard Deviation of Tabanidae collected at five sites in the Rolling Plains of Texas during the summer of 1982.

SITE NUMBER OF

OBSERVATIONS

MEAN STANDARD

DEVIATION

Burkburnett

Childress

Malaise

Masterson

Sweetwater

12

21

19

24

25

26.32

2.66

0.47

233.66

26.32

55.49

4.18

1 .61

439.73

55.49

49

SITE=8URK8URNETT fAJHSER 90

80

70

60

SO

HO

30

20

JO

» » i i i i i i i i » i » »

ISHflT T

OUJUN 2HJUN liUUL

QflTE

• • 1 ' '

OSflUG 23RUG 12SEP

Figure 15. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap at Burkburnett, Texas from May 17 to November 21, 1982.

50

SITE=aiIU5RESS

NUnSCR

m

13

12

11

10

8

04JUN 24JUN 220CT 11NOV

Figure 16. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids co l l ec t ed in the Manitoba t r ap at Ch i ld r e s s , . Texas from May 27 to November 6, 1982.

51

SITE=mSTERSON NUMBER 1500 -}

moo -

1300 -^

1200 -j

1100 -

1000 -j

900 -

800 -I

700 -J

600 -j

500 -j

1400 ^

300 -

200 -J

100 -

0 - * » » * •i H 111 n 11111111 n 11111111 n 1111 11 11111 1111111111)1 ) 111 n 11111111 n I n I

2SnPR ISHflr aHJW ZUUH mJUL 03AUG 23AUC 12SEP 020CT 220CT IINOV

DATE

Figure 17. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas from May 14 to November 13, 1982.

52

NUHSER 7

6

SITE=t1flU)ISE

H

T T 4 1 - * - * - • - • » » * » * I i i i i i i m m ^trrrr^FTwrjvrrrr^r^rjr.^'mrrrrTjr.^www^ry^r.^n^^^'trrjttf i n i rrTTTTTTyrT^

2SBPR ISMflT OqjUN 2«UUN lUJUL OSflUC 23flUG 12SEP 020Cr 220CT UNOV

OPTE

Figure 18. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Malaise trap on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas from May 14 to November 13, 1982.

53

SITE=SHEETHflTER

NUNSER 220

200

180

180 -

140

120 -

100 -

80 -

60 -

40

20 -1

0 -• p^yT<^^^^H^^^^^ifWi»W>TTTT<^'>TTTT^^*^^^^^^T**^^*'''" ' < |IIH.^^^TT^^ ;

25APR ISMPT 04JUN 2(UUN 14JUL 03RUG 23PUG 12SEP 020CT 220CT 11NOV

ORTE

Figure 19. Seasonal occurrence of tabanids collected in the Manitoba trap at Sweetwater, Texas from May 28 to November 21, 1982.

54

peaks to occur later in the season, near the end of July, a

difference of an entire month from the Masterson site, where

fly populations peaked near the end of June. This differ­

ence may be important in the timing of broadcast insecti­

cides for their control.

A total of 15 species were collected within the Rolling

Plains region (Table 2). As would be expected, all but four

of these were females. Males are not normally collected at

traps since they are not attracted to them for feeding pur­

poses. However some males were collected. Two T. abactor

males were collected, one at the Masterson site and one at

Sweetwater. One Tabanus atratus Fabr. male and one Tabanus

subsimilis subsimilis Bellardi male were collected at the

Burkburnett site. In addition one dead male T_. abactor was

found lying in a dry stream bottom on the Masterson Ranch.

Traps were empty 45 of 106 times inspected. The low cap­

ture rate was largely due to the poor efficiency of the

Malaise trap at the Masterson Ranch site and the Manitoba

trap at the Childress site, collecting flies on only 3 of 19

and 11 of 21 dates, respectively. The continuation of trap­

ping for two weeks beyond the first hard freeze also con­

tributed to the high frequency of empty traps.

55

Table 2. Tabanidae collected in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982, including the frequency, number, and period of occurrence of each species collected.

SPECIES FREQ. NUM. PERIOD OF OCCURRENCE

Chrysops callidus 0. S

C. flavidus Wied.

—' Pi^^i Whitney

C_. virgulatus Bellardi

Silvius pollinosus Williston

^. quadrivittatus

quadrivittatus (Say)

^. q, texanus Pechuman

Tabanus abactor Philip T. atratus Fabr.

T. nigripes Wied.

T. punctifer 0. S.

T . subsimilis subsimilis Bellardi

2

9

10

5

5

4

5

46

4

4

2

22

3

15

28

1 1

24

6

9

6,239

4

6

2

170

20

18

03

20

14

30

09

03

09

05

14

03

Jul.

Jul.

Jun .

Jun.

Jun .

Jun.

Jun.

Jun.

Jun.

Jul.

Jun.

Jun.

- 30

- 22

- 15

- 15

- 02

- 15

- 23

- 06

- 29

- 20

- 22

- 20

Jul.

Sep.

Sep.

Sep.

Aug.

Sep.

Aug.

Oct.

Sep.

Oct.

Jul.

Oct.

T. sulcifrons Macquart

T. trimaculatus P. de B

T. venustus 0. S.

4 44

1 1

2 4

28 Jul. - 15 Sep

01 Jul. - 01 Jul

09 Jun. - 19 Jul.

56

The probability of collecting T. abactor in the Rolling

Plains was found to be significantly greater than the prob­

ability of collecting any other tabanid species (X =

5323.14, d.f.=l4, p<0.05). Tabanus abactor was collected

most often, present in 46 of the 106 collection dates (Table

2). Tabanus subsimilis subsimilis Bellardi and the deer fly

Chrysops pikei Whitney were also collected quite often

(Table 2). Tabanus abactor was also present within the

Rolling Plains for the longest period of any tabanid during

the summer (Table 2). Field observations were consistent

with trapping data. Tabanus abactor females were seen to

attack cattle during the same period and at the same inten­

sity as they were collected in traps.

Chrysops pikei, T. abactor, and T^. _s. subsimilis were

collected on more than five occasions within the study area.

Chrysops pikei, collected at both the Childress and Master-

son sites, showed peak populations in late May and June,

although perhaps the population could have peaked before

traps were constructed (Figure 20). Populations of T. abac-

tor peaked in late June to early July, with flies being

present throughout the summer from early June till frost in

October (Figure 21). Tabanus £. subsimilis populations

peaked later in the season with the highest populations

present during late July (Figure 22).

57

SPECIES=C. PIKEI

NUMBER 10

-¥• *-

• ' ' ' I I I I I I

25MflT 14 JUN OUJUL 24JUL

DATE

13flUG 02SEP 22SEP

Figure 20. Seasonal occurrence of Chrysops pikei in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21 , 1982.

58

SPECIES=T. flBflCTOR

NUMBER 1500 -I

moo -

1300 ^

1200 ^

1100 -J

1000 -;

900 -J

800 -

700 ^

600 -_

500 -|

400 ^

300 -|

200 -J

100 -

0 - u OSMflT 25MflT 14JUN

* * • >• *

I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1

04JUL 24JUL

ORTE

• I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I . . . . . T r I J

13flUG 02SEP 22SEP 120CT

Figure 21 . Seasonal occurrence of Tabanus abactor in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982.

59

SPECIES=r. SUBSIMILIS

NUMBER 42

39

36

33

30

27

24

21

18

IS

12

1 1 1 1 I ' ' ' I I 1 I I

25MflT 14JUN 04JUL 24JUL 13flUG 02SEP 22SEP 120CT

DATE

Figure 22. Seasonal occurrence of Tabanus subsimilis sub-similis in the Texas Rolling Plains from May 14 to November 21, 1982.

60

Although more flies were collected from the Masterson

Ranch location, more species were collected at the Burkbur­

nett site (Figures 23-26). This may be due in part to the

use of CO2 at this site as an attractant. The Masterson and

Sweetwater locations yielded the same number of species

although the species were quite different (Figures 23, 24).

Both sites had a high percentage of T. abactor (99/& and 87%

respectively). The presence of T. abactor in similar num­

bers at both sites indicates the presence of some common

factor or factors which are beneficial to its development.

Tabanus abactor was the only species collected in the

Malaise trap (Figure 25). Tabanus abactor was also the most

prevalent species at the Burkburnett site, followed by J. ^.

subsimilis, Tabanus sulcifrons Mackquart, and C_, pikei

respectively (Figure 26). As might be suspected, those

sites with greater numbers of a single species (T. abactor)

seem to have fewer numbers of species present and those

which are present are only present in small quantities.

The Childress site produced very few flies, 56 in all,

with T. s, subsimilis being collected most frequently (Fig­

ure 25). It is possible that the location of the trap could

have been the reason for the low capture rate; however, the

owner also confirms the low density of horse flies on his

ranch (Mr. Waters, pers. comm.).

61

SITE=MflSTERSON

SPECIES

T. PUNCTIFER

T. ATRATUS

T. ABflCTOR

S. POLLINOSUS

S. aOUflORIVIT

S. Q. TEXRNUS

C. FLflVIDIS

C. PIKEI

T. SUBSIMILIS

^

FREO

5566

21

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 111111

I 2000 4000 6000

FREQUENCY

PERCENT

0.04

0.02

99.25

0.37

0.09

0.11

0.05

0.04

0.04

Figure 23. Frequency.and percent of tabanid species col­lected at the Masterson Ranch, King Co., Texas, Summer 1982, by Manitoba trap without CO2•

62

SITE=SWEETWflTER

SPECIES

T. ATRATUS

T. ABACTOR

S. POLLINOSUS

S. Q. TEXANUS

C. FLAVIDIS

T. NIGRIPES

C. VIRGULATUS

T. SUBSIMILIS

C.CALLIOUS

:^

I

FREO

574

10

11

51

1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1

PERCENT

0.15

87.23

0.46

0.15

1.52

0.76

1.67

7.75

0.30

r * • ' • I ' • • ' I • ' ' ' I ' • ' • I • • • • 1

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

FREOUENCT

LEGEND: C02 N \ \ \ 1 PRESENT fyV/yl ABSENT

Figure 24. Frequency and percent of tabanid species col­lected at Sweetwater, Texas, Summer 1982 by Man itoba trap with and without CO2.

63

SITE=CHILORESS

SPECIES

T. ATRATUS

T. ABACTOR

C. FLAVIDIS

T. SUBSIMILIS

^

FREO

0 10 20 30 40 50

FREOUENCT

46

PERCENT

1.79

14.29

1.79

82.14

SPECIES

T. ABACTOR ^

SITE=MALAISE

I T^TTTT H ^ I T TT^yTV t f f T l l T f r t ^

FREO

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

FREOUENCT

PERCENT

100.00

LEGEND: C02 N W M PRESENT ry//A ABSENT

Figure 25. Frequency and percent of tabanid species col­lected at Childress, Texas, by Manitoba trap and at the Masterson Ranch by Malaise trap. Summer 1982, with and without CO2.

64

SITE=8URICBURNETT

SPECIES

I ATRATUS

T. ABACTOR

S. 0. OUADRIVIT.

S. Q. TEXANUS

C. FLAVIDIS

C. PIKEI

T. VENUSTUS

T. TRIMACULATUS

T. SULCIFRONS

T. NIGRIPES

T. SUBSIMILIS

C. CALLIDUS

±:

:^ Zl

(A

FREQ

82

26

44

71

PERCENT

0.43

34.89

0.43

0.85

0.43

11.06

1.70

0.43

18.72

0.43

JO. 21

0.43

0 20 40 60 80 100

FREOUENCT

LEGEND: C02 N \ \ \ 1 PRESENT \///A ABSENT

Figure 26. Frequency and percent of tabanid species col­lected at Burkburnett, Texas, Summer 1982 by Manitoba trap with and without CO2.

65

A comparison of the rainfall, temperature, vegetation,

and topography among these sites suggests why T. abactor

predominates at the Masterson, Sweetwater, and Burkburnett

sites but not at the Childress location (Table 3). It

appears that the amount of rainfall present at a site corre­

lates positively to the number of species present (Table 3,

Figs. 23-26). Rainfall alone probably cannot account for

the difference in species between sites. The temperature

differences between sites may also have an affect on tabanid

development (Table 3, Figure 14).

The vegetation and topography of these sites may have a

greater influence on tabanid development than the weather

since the availability of water is ultimately dependent on

the drainage of the site. The vegetation at each site is

generally indicative of the climate, soil types, topography,

and subsequent drainage and water availability of the site.

The main difference in these sites is the presence or

absence of junipers (Juniperus spp.). This is due mostly to

soil composition and terrain. Junipers are especially com­

mon on poor, dry, rocky, mesa type areas and in limestone

and gypeus soils (Correll and Johnston, 1979). These areas

are also characterized by numerous valleys and intermittent

streams where tabanids may develop. The Childress site

lacks junipers, with honey mesquite (?_. glandulosa) as the

66

Table 3. Average yearly temperature and cumulative rainfall of the four trapping locations in the Texas Roll­ing Plains.

LOCATION AVERAGE CUMMULATIVE TEMP, rc) RAINFALL (mm)

Burkburnett'' 17.83 69.14

(Wichita Falls)

Childress'' 16.61 52.50

Masterson Ranch^ 18.81 53.57 (Guthrie)

Sweetwater'' 17.39 56.36 (Roscoe)

(1) Based on 30 year averages.

(2) Based on 1981 and 1982 averages (U.S. Environmental Data Service, 1981 ,1982) .

67

predominant vegetation. This site also lacks valleys and

streams, as previously noted, being less rugged than the

other sites. The only water present is in man-made water

tanks fed by springs. The absence of development sites

other than ponds, in conjunction with low rainfall and

cooler temperatures, probably explains why so few species

are found at this location. The fields at the Burkburnett

site have been cleared of unwanted plant species and natural

vegetation is more scarce. Numerous streams, ponds, and

several vegetation types can be found at this site. These

varied habitats, along with high temperatures and rainfall,

probably account for the large diversity of species col­

lected there.

Tabanus abactor was present at all sites, developing best

in areas of rugged terrain with numerous valleys and inter­

mittent streams (Masterson and Sweetwater sites). Its pres­

ence at Burkburnett in smaller numbers than at the Masterson

and Sweetwater sites indicates either the lack of suitable

development sites, or possibly competetion with other spec­

ies developing at the Burkburnett site but not at the other

sites. The absence of large numbers of J. abactor at the

Childress site is probably due to the combination of unsui­

table habitats, low rainfall, lower temperatures, and possi­

bly competition with "!_. s^. subsimilis.

68

Carbon dioxide, used at the Childress, Sweetwater, and

Burkburnett sites, aided in the collection of tabanids.

Overall, a greater number of flies were collected using dry

ice (x = 31 + 57.0, n = 21) than without it (1? = 8 + 21.0, n = 37,

Figures 27, 28). This difference, however, was not shown to

be statistically significant (t=1.76, d.f.=23, p>0.05). The

lack of significant difference between the presence or

absence of CO2 could have been due to the method employed.

The holes in the lids of the styrofoam coolers containing

dry ice sometimes became frosted over, thus decreasing the

effective amount of CO2 released. The location of holes on

the sides of coolers may have prevented this.

Two more species were collected using dry ice than were

collected using the Manitoba trap alone (Figures 27, 28).

Only two species which were collected at Burkburnett, Ta­

banus trimaculatus P. de B. and Tabanus venustus 0. S., were

collected only in the absence of dry ice (Figure 28). This

compares to four species being collected only in the pres­

ence of dry ice (Chrysops callidus 0. S., Tabanus nigripes

Wied., Silvius pollinosus Williston, and Si 1 viu-s quadrivit-

tatus quadrivittatus Say, Figure 27). The use of CO2 seems

warranted when surveying tabanids as more individuals and

species are collected.

69

C02=PRESENT

SPECIES

T. ATRATUS

T. ABACTOR

S. POLLINOSUS

S. Q. OUAORIVIT.

S. Q. TEXANUS

C. FLflVIDIS

C: PIKEI

T. SULCIFRONS

r NIGRIPES

C.VIRGUL3TUS

T. SUBSIMILIS

C.CALLIDUS

FREQ

442

37

134

1 1 1 I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1 1 |i 1 1 " " ' 1 1 1 " " ' 11 I " " " " I "

0 ICO 200 300 400 500

FREOUENCT

PERCENT

0.31

68.10

0.46

0.15

0.15

1.23

0.4F

5.70

0.92

1.39

20.65

45

Figure 27. Frequency and percent of tabanid species col­lected at Burkburnett, Childress, and Sweetwa­ter, Texas, Summer 1982, using Manitoba traps with dry ice as an added attractant.

70

C02=ABSENT

SPECIES

T. ATRATUS .

T. ABACTOR

S. Q. TEXANUS

C FLAVIDIS

C. PIKEI

T. VENUSTUS

T. TRIMACULATUS

T. SULCIFRONS

C. VIRGULATUS

T. SUBSIMILIS

X

FREO

222

23

34

l l l l l l l I I [ I I I I I I I I H I I I I I I I I I I I M l l l l M ] I I I l l l l l l | l l

0 50 100 150 200 250

FREOUENCT

PERCENT

0.33

74.00

0.67

1.33

7.67

1.33

0.33

2.33

0.67

11.33

Figure 28 . Frequency and percent of tabanid species col­lected at Burkburnett, Childess, and Sweetwater, Texas, Summer 1982, using Manitoba traps without dry ice.

71

Nighttime Habitats

The handling and painting of flies was not detrimental to

their normal activities. In most cases marked and released

individuals were seen to return immediately to the vehicle

or to me and attempt feeding. Tabanus abactor females

marked on previous days were also seen to return to attack.

The flies could be easily located using the hand-held black-

light and during dark nights could be seen 20 meters or more

away. This distance diminished rapidly, however, during

bright moonlit nights. The colors most observable in the

field were fluorescent orange and yellow. Several arachnids

(scorpions and spiders) fluoresced with the same frequency

as the fluorescent yellow paint which caused some difficulty

in locating marked flies. Fluorescent orange proved to be

the best color and was used as often as possible because of

this (Figure 29).

Out of a total release of 2,046 painted T. abactor

females, 104 were found. This corresponds to a 5% location

rate. In five instances flies were found on the second eve­

ning after release, and one fly was even located on the

third night following release.

A total of 670 flies were released at site A (Valley

site) and 1,376 were released at site B (Hilltop site).

72

Figure 29. Painted T. abactor flies under U.V. light. Fluoresc'ent orange was the preferred color.

73

From these, 72 were located at site A and 32 at site B.

This corresponds to a location rate of 11% for site A and 2%

for site B. This difference is probably due to the geo­

graphical dissimilarity between site A and B. The flies at

site B (Hilltop) also flew significantly further than those

at sight A (Valley) (x=242.0 + 221.9 m, n=32; x=26.3 + 29.8

m, n=32, respectively, t=-5.4, d.f.=32, p<0.01). This dif­

ference in flight distance for each site probably also

accounts for the larger percentage of flies collected at

site A than at site B.

The flies after release usually flew with the wind rather

than against it. This is unusual since most insects orient

themselves against the wind when in flight. Generally, the

flies at site A flew in an east and west direction along the

valley (Figure 30). Those at site B flew with the wind,

sometimes for long distances, with one being located .8 km.

(.5 mi.) from the release site (Figure 30). Direction was

not taken into account initially; this explains why the

direction of flight is recorded for only 28 of the 72 flies

located at site A. In addition to flying with southerly

winds, flies also flew down into the valleys to the north

and south of the release site where larger vegetation and

water were often present.

74

FREOUENCT

30 ^

25 -

20 -

IS -

10 -

s -

N

DIRECTION

LECENOJ SITE 5 3 3 ^ 8

Figure 30. Direction of flight of marked Tabanus abactor females from the point of release at both sites used in nighttime habitat study; Site A=Valley site. Site B=Hilltop.

75

Flies remained stationary at night unless disturbed.

Tabanus abactor females were found to rest on several types

of vegetation (Figure 31). The occurrence of both the

grasses and the branch substrates signifies flies which pre­

ferred to land on objects close to the ground. One fly was

found resting on the black ball attractant source (Sphere)

used on the Manitoba trap located at release site A. This

points to the possibility that some flies may remain on an

animal at night, although this was not examined in the

field.

There appears to be a vegetational preference for Junip-

erus pinchottii Sudw. (redberry juniper; Cedar, Figure 31),

but if the plant community as a whole is taken into account,

this is not so. Junipers are found to represent over 50% of

the plant community, perhaps as much as 70%. Larger trees

such as mesquite _P. glandulosa, elm Celtis occidentalis (L.)

and sumack Rhus microphylla (Engelm) are found in much lower

densities. The other plant species on which flies were

found: (Condalia hookeri M.C., Celtis reticulata Torr.,

Juglans microcarpa Berl., Rhus aromatica Ait., and Ziziphus

obtusifolia T. and G.) are also present in much lower densi­

ties than junipers.

76

PLANT

Dead Branch on Ground

C. hookeri

C. occidentalis

C. reticulata

Grasses

J. microcarpa

£. pinchottii

£. glandulosa

R. aromatica

R. microphylla

Sphere on Manitoba Trap

Z, ob tus i fo l i a

FREO

13

6

11

3U

m

m

^ t ^ ^ ^ W ^ ^ ^ ^ . 1 I I I I I I I I ^p^^-rT^^^^y. . r^^"^^r^^^T

10 20

FREOUENCT

30 40

PERCENT

0.96

1.92

12.50

S.77

10.58

0.96

32.69

13.46

5.77

13.46

0.96

0.96

Figure 31. Frequency and percent of Tabanus abactor females located at night on different vegetation and substrates at both site A and B.

77

A significantly greater number of flies were found to

prefer cryptic habitats over more open types (x=4.M j- 6.0,

n=17; x=1.0 + 2.2, n=17, of flies located/date for leafy and

open habitats, respectively; t=2.7, d.f.=l6, p<0.05).

Approximately 72% of those located were found on leafy

areas, with only 2S% preferring some other type of environ­

ment .

The distance flies were found from the ground corre­

sponded to the type of plant on which they were found (Fig­

ure 32). The average size of junipers and other smaller

vegetation accounts for the presence of 44 flies (42%) found

between 1.05 - 1.50 meters (Figure 32).

The flies' geographical location also had an impact on

their spatial distribution. A large number of flies were

found above 2.25 meters at site B (Figure 32). These were

in large trees at the edges of dry stream beds in a valley.

It is also possible that other flies at higher resting sites

were not observed due to the limited reach of the black-

light.

78

FREOUENCT

4 5 H

40 -

35

30 -

25 -

20 -

15 -

10 -

5 -

3- . 55 . 5 5 - 1 . 0 5 1 . 0 5 - 1 . 5 0

HEIGHT IN METERS

LEGENO! SITE I i fl &-666<l 8

1 , .50-2.25 >2 .25

Figure 32. Spatial distribution (height from the ground) of Tabanus abactor females located on vegetation at night at site A and B.

79

Congregation was observed once between one painted and

one unpainted fly. Flies were also distributed unevenly

throughout the ranch, with large populations being located

in certain regions.

Flies showed a marked geographical preference for shel­

tered low-lying valleys and slopes over more open, flat

hilltops (Figure 33). Overall, 86% of the flies located

preferred these low-lying areas to more open hilltops.

Those flies released at site A remained in the valley (38%)

or moved toward the slopes (62%), never moving to the open

hilltops (Figure 33). The slopes at this site usually cor­

responded with the breastworks of a dam with heavy vegeta­

tion growing on it. Those flies released at site B (hill­

top) preferred to fly to the valley, 450 meters away (47%)

or slopes (25%), rather than remaining on the hilltops

(28%).

The adults' preference for low-lying sheltered areas may

indicate that similar locations are utilized as feeding and

breeding sites. These areas could also'be the best targets

for broadcast insecticide treatments. Broadcast sprays

applied in early morning or late evening before adults

become active may reduce T. abactor populations.

80

PERCENTflGE

35 -I

30 -

25 -

20 -

;5 -

10 -

s -1

R 8

j — HILLTOP

14%

R 6

SLOPE

44%

fl 8 SITE

VALLEY ! OESC

42%

Figure 33. Geographical preference of Tabanus abactor females at night within the Texas Roiling Plains.

81

Larval Collections

A total of 57 tabanid larvae were collected from the Mas­

terson Ranch (Table 4). Fifty-three larvae were collected

from typical tabanid habitats and five were collected from

dry (atypical) sites. Larvae were collected from the litto­

ral zone of both watering tanks and small watering holes

found in intermittent stream beds. Larvae were usually

found under 2.5-4 cm. of mud, but some were collected away

from the shore under 2-3 cm. of water. The larvae collected

from these habitats appeared to be the same species. In

addition two other larvae of the same species were collected

from dried stream beds, an atypical habitat for tabanids.

Larvae were light colored, with dark bands at the junction

of each segment, and were usually very active (Figure 34).

Two of these larvae pupated and one male T_. atratus emerged

on April 24, 1983.

According to H. J. Teskey (Biosystematics Research Insti­

tute, Canada), representatives of these larvae were all of

the same species but definitely were not J. atratus. He

also states that these larvae have not been previously iden­

tified. Those Tabanus species from this region which have

not been described are T. abactor, T. cheliopterus, T.

equalis, T. nefarius, T. quaesitus, and T. texanus (H. J.

82

Table 4. Tabanid larvae collected on the Masterson Ranch in King Co., Texas, Summer 1982 and Spring 1983, . including number, size range, and site description for larvae on each collection date.

Larva Date Number Size Range Site in mm. Description

Unidentified

M It

H i t

»1 U

tl It

It It

It It

Ii 11

It I I

T. atratus 1

Unidentified

It 11

It It

Aug.

Aug.

Sep.

Sep.

Sep.

Sep.

Oct.

Oct.

Oct.

Oct.

Mar .

Mar .

Apr .

Apr .

26,

27,

5,

12,

18,

25

2

2

16

23

13

13

30

30

82

82

82

82

82

r 82

, 82

, 82

, 82

, 82

, 83

, 83

, 83

, 83

1

1

5

4

4

5

2

7

1

2

2

1

1

3

2.5X.7

2.5X.5

2.5X.3-5.5X.7

1.5X.2-3.5X.4

1.7X.2-5.7X.5

1.5X-3.5X1 .5

3.IX.6-3.5X.7

.9X.1-3.5X1.5

1 .5X.2

3.IX.6-3.5X.7

2.3X.3-4.5X.4

3.8X.5

3.2X.6

.7X.1-1.8X.3

A

A

B

B

A

B

C

B

C

C

C

D

D

E

Site Description:

A = Intermittent stream bed with small water puddle. B = Intermittent stream bed with large water puddle. C = Large water tank, sandy - rocky shore-line. D = Dry intermittent stream bed. E = Manure pad, xeric habitat. 1 = Pupated or Emerged.

83

Figure 34. Larvae of unidentified Tabanus spp. (possibly T abactor) collected from both~typical and atypi-"caT tabanid habitats at the Masterson Ranch, King Co., Texas, Summer 1982, and Spring 1983.

84

Teskey, pers. comm.). If the remaining larvae are not i;*

atratus, then the probability that they are T. abactor is

high because none of the other species mentioned have been

collected from this site. Also, adults of the other species

are too small to develop from the largest of the larvae col­

lected (H. J. Teskey, pers. comm.). It appears that two

species have been collected, one being T. atratus, and the

other possibly T. abactor.

All but one of the other larvae taken into the laboratory

for rearing died. Those larvae placed in sand died within 3

days, apparently due to the abrasion of the substrate and

the higher moisture present. Most of those placed in 400

ml. beakers also died due to an uncontrolled increase in

temperature in the laboratory. The remaining larva has not

yet undergone metamorphosis.

Three larvae of a third species were collected on April

30, 1983 from two adjacent manure pads in xeric habitats.

The manure pads were dry on the surface but were slightly

moist in the center where the larvae were found. Other

insect larvae (Scarabaeidae), which could act as a food

source, were found in this habitat as well. Larvae were

yellowish in color, with no striations and were very slug­

gish in their activity (Figure 35).

85

Figure 35. Tabanus larva (probably T. s. subsimilis) col-lected^from manure pad aT tHe Master son Ranch , King Co. , Texas, April 30, 1983.

86

Two of these larvae pupated on May 15, and May 13, 1983.

Pupae were obtect and dark brown to black with spines pro­

jecting from the posterior portion of each abdominal segment

and stout spines projecting from the tip of the last abdomi­

nal segment. Pupation lasted 11 days with one male and one

female Tabanus species emerging on May 26 and 29 respec­

tively. These were both identified by R. Wright at Oklahoma

State University as probably being Tabanus subsimilis sub­

similis . However, this species belongs to a species complex

with Tabanus lineola, and in some cases there is some uncer­

tainty, as to the differences between these two species with

the possibility that a third, and undescribed species, is

also present.

CHAPTER IV

CONCLUSIONS

Tabanus abactor is the most abundant and important horse

fly pest infesting the Rolling Plains of Texas. It was

present at all, and predominated at most, sites within the

study area. Tabanus abactor appears to develop best in

areas of rugged terrain, with numerous valleys, intermittent

streams, and abundant junipers. Tabanids were more abundant

in regions with higher annual temperatures and rainfall.

Tabanus abactor is the dominant species throughout the Roll­

ing Plains except in the northernmost region. Tabanus s.

subsimilis is the dominant species of this region, perhaps

due to the moderate terrain, cooler temperatures, and lower

rainfall. The nighttime resting locations of T_. abactor

also reveal their preference for low lying valley and stream

locations. Their attraction to these areas may prove useful

in control. Applications of insecticide to these areas in

early morning or late evening during the periods of the year

of peak tabanid abundance could significantly reduce tabanid

populations.

Larvae of T. atratus and an unknown tabanid (possibly T.

abactor) were found to develop in and around watering tanks

and streams and in some cases were able to resist desicca-

87

88

tion well enough to exist in dry stream beds. Application

of insecticides with short residual activity to the littoral

zone of water tanks may also help decrease populations of T_.

abactor and other tabanid species. The discovery of T. ^.

subsimilis larvae in the very atypical habitats of manure

pads is also significant. Other species (possibly T. abac­

tor) may also develop there. If so, larvicidal feed addi­

tives fed to range cattle could be used to render these

habitats inhospitable to tabanid development.

More research on the control of T. abactor is needed.

Before progress in the control of T_. abactor can be

achieved, the location and duration of larval development of

this pest must be determined. Other areas in need of

research include: 1) efficacy tests on insecticides directed

toward larvae and adults applied to the areas mentioned, 2)

determination of actual losses in weight gains due to

tabanid attacks, and 3) the possibility of using biological

control against both larvae and adults of T. abactor.

LITERATURE CITED

Anderson, J. F., and F. R. Kneen. 1969. The temporary impoundment of salt marshes for the control of coastal deer flies. Mosquito News. 29(2):239-243.

Bay, D. E., N. C. Ronald, and R. L. Harris. 1976. Evalua­tion of a synthetic pyrethroid for tabanid control on horses and cattle. Southwest. Entomol. 1(4):198-203.

Beesley, W. N., and W. Crewe. 1963. The bionomics of Chry­sops silacea Austen. II. The biting rhythm and disper-sal in rain-forest. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 57:191-203.

Bennett, G. F., and S. M. Smith. 1968. Phosphorus for marking Tabanidae (Diptera). Mosquito News. 28(4):559- 568.

Blume, R. R., J. A. Miller, J. L. Eschle, J. J. Matter, and M. 0. Pickens. 1972. Trapping tabanids with a modi­fied Malaise trap baited with CO,. Mosquito News. 32(1):90-95.

Blume, R. R., R. H. Roberts, J. L. Eschle, and J. J. Matter. 1971. Tests of aerosols of Deet for protection of livestock from biting flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 64 (5):1193-1196.

Borror, D. J., D. M. Delong, and C. A. Triplehorn. 1976. An Introduction to the Study of Insects. 4th ed. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Dallas. 852 pp.

Bosler, E. M., and E. J. Hansens. 1974. Natural feeding behavior of adult saltmarsh greenheads and its relation to oogenesis. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 67:321-324.

Bracken, G. K., W. Havec, and A. Thorsteinson. 1962. The orientation of horse flies and deer flies (Tabanidae Diptera). II. The role of some visual factors in the attractiveness of decoy silhouettes. Can. J. Zool. 40:685-695.

Brown, L., and J. L. Lancaster. 1973. Controlling horse flies on cattle. Ark. Farm Res. 22(5):6.

89

90

Bruce, W. N., and G. C. Decker. 1951. Tabanid control on dairy and beef cattle with synergized pyrethrins. J. Econ. Entomol. 44:154-159.

Correll, D. S., and M. C. Johnston. 1979. Manual of the vascular plants of Texas. Texas Research Foundation, Renner, Texas. 1881 pp.

Curran, C. H. 1966. Family Tabanidae - The horse flies, pp. 148-154. In The Families and Genera of North American Diptera. 2nd ed. Henry Tripp, New York.

Davis, S. G. 1979. Seasonal and geographical distribution of Tabanus abactor Philip and associated species in the Texas Rolling Plains. A Thesis in Entomology. Texas Tech University. Lubbock, Tx.

Davis S. G., and D. P. Sanders. 1981. Seasonal and geo­graphical distribution of Tabanus abactor Philip in the Texas Rolling Plains. Southwest, tntomol. 6(2):8l-86.

Dikmans, G. 1950. The transmission of anaplasmosis. Am. J. Vet. Res. 11 :5-l6.

Fasten, E. R., M. A. Price, and 0. H. Grahm. 1968. The collection of biting flies in west Texas with Malaise and animal baited traps. Mosquito News. 28(3):465-469.

Eddy, G. W., A. R. Roth, and F. W. Plapp. 1962. Studies on the flight habits of some marked insects. J. Econ. Entomol. 55(5) : 603-607.

Ezell, W. B. Jr. 1973. Interspecific variation in the flight responses of tabanids (Insecta: Diptera) to cer­tain visual and chemical stimuli. Bull. South Carolina Acad. Sci. 35:100-1 11 .

Fales, J. H., 0. F. Bodenstein, G. D. Mills, and L. H. Wes-sel. 1964. Preliminary studies on face fly disper­sion. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57(1) : 135-137 .

Freeman, J., and E. J. Hansens. 1972. Collecting larvae of the salt marsh greenhead Tabanus nigrovittatus and related species in New Jersey: Comparison of Methods. Environ. Entomol. 1 (5 ): 653-658.

Granett, P., and E. J. Hansens. 1956. The effect of biting fly control on milk production. J. Econ. Entomol. 49(4) :465-467.

91

Granett, P., and E. J. Hansens. 1957. Futher observations on the effect of biting fly control on milk producing cattle. J. Econ. Entomol. 50:332-336.

Granger, C. A. 1970. Trap design and color as factors in trapping -the saltmarsh greenhead fly. J. Econ. Ento­mol. 63(5) :1670-1672.

Hansens, E. J. 1947. Greenhead flies (Tabanus nigrovitta­tus) like dark colours. New Jersey Agric. 29:3-4.

Hansens, E. J. 1956. Granulated insecticides against greenhead (Tabanus) larvae in the salt marsh. J. Econ. Entomol. 49:401-403.

Hansens, E. J. 1979. Review: Tabanidae of the east coast as an economic problem. J. New York Entomol. Soc. 87(4):312-318.

Hansens, E. J. 1981. Resmethrin and Permethrin sprays to reduce anoyance from a deer fly Chrysops atlanticus. J. Econ. Entomol. 74:3-4.

Hansens, E. J., E. M. Bosler, and J. W. Robinson. 1971. Use of traps for study and control of saltmarsh green­head flies. J. Econ. Entomol. 64(6):1481-1486 .

Hawkins, J. A., W. V. Adams Jr., B. H. Wilson, C. J. Issel, and E. E. Roth. 1976. Transmission of equine infec­tious anemia virus by Tabanus fuscicostatus. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 68(1):63-64.

Hocking, B. 1953. The intrinsic range and speed of flight of insects. Trans. R. Entomol. Soc. London. 104:223-345.

Hollander, A. L., and R. E. Wright. 1980a. Daily activity cycles of Oklahoma Tabanidae (Diptera). Environ. Entomol. 9:600-604.

Hollander, A. L., and R. E. Wright. 1980b. Impact of tabanids on cattle: blood meal size and preferred feed­ing sites. J. Econ. Entomol. 73(3) : 431-433.

Issel, C. J., and L. Coggins. 1979. Equine infectious ane­mia: Current knowledge. J. Am. Vet. Assoc. 174(7): 727-733.

92

James, M. I., and R. F. Harwood. 1969. Horse flies, deer flies and snipe flies. pp.223-233. In Herm's Medical Entomology. 6th ed. The Macmillan Company. Collier-Macmillan Ltd. London.

Joyce, J. M., and E. J. Hansens. 1968. The influence of weather on the activity and behavior of greenhead flies, Tabanus nigriovittatus Macquart and T. lineola Fabricius. J. New York Entomol. Soc. 76:72-80.

Kahn, N. H. 1952. Oviposition and hatching in some species of Tabanidae. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 43:550-553.

Kemen, M. J. 1977. Equine infectious anemia: The contro­versy continues. The Cornell Veterinarian. 67(2):177-189.

Kniepert, F. W. 1980. Blood-feeding and nectar-feeding in adult Tabanidae (Diptera). Oecologia. 46(1):125-129 .

Krinskey, W. L. 1976. Animal disease agents transmitted by horse flies and deer flies (Diptera: Tabanidae). J. Med. Entomol. 13(3) : 225-275 .

Lindquist, A. W., and E. F. Knipling. 1957. Recent advances in veterinary entomology. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2:181-202.

Magnarelli, L. A., and J. F. Anderson. 1981. Sugar feeding by female tabanids (Diptera: Tabanidae) and its rela­tion to gonotropic activity. J. Med. Entomol. 18(5): 429-433.

Magnarelli, L. A., J. F. Anderson, and J. H. Thorne. 1979. Diurnal nectar-feeding of salt marsh Tabanidae (Dip­tera). Environ. Entomol. 8(3) : 544-548 .

McGregor, W. S., and 0. C. Schomberg. 1952. A partial annotated list of species of the Tabanidae. J. Econ. Entomol. 45(4):746.

Parman, D. C. 1928. Experimental dissemination of the egg parasite Phanurus emersoni Girault and biological notes on the species. U.S.D.A. Circular No. 18. 7 pp.

Pechuman, L. L. 1981. The horse flies and deer flies of New York (Diptera, Tabanidae). Search. 18:1-66.

93

Philip, c. B. 1928. Methods of collecting and rearing the immature stages of Tabanidae (Diptera). J. Parasitol. 14(4):243-253.

Philip, C. B. 1931. The Tabanidae (horseflies) of Minne­sota with special reference to their biologies and tax­onomy. Minn. Agric. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. No. 80. 128 pp.

Philip, C. B. 1936. New Tabanidae (horseflies) with notes on certain species of the longus group of Tabanus. Ohio J. of Science. 36:149-156.

Roberts, R. H. 1970. Tabanidae collected in a Malaise trap baited with CO2. Mosquito News. 30(1):52-53.

Roberts, R. H. 1972. The effectiveness of several types of Malaise traps for the collection of Tabanidae and Cu-licidae. Mosquito News. 32(4 ) :542-547 .

Roberts, R. H., and R. J. Dicke. 1964. The biology and taxonomy of some immature Neartic Tabanidae (Diptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 57:31-40.

Roberts, R. H., and W. A. Pund. 1974. Control of biting flies on beef steers: Effect on performance in pasture and feedlot. J. Econ. Entomol. 67:232-234.

Sanborn, C. E., G. W. Stiles, and L. H. Mai. 1932. Prelim­inary experiments in the transmission of anaplasmosis by horseflies. Oaklohoma Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 204. 15 pp.

Schomberg, 0. 1952. Larval habitat of Tabanus sulcifrons in Oklahoma. J. Econ. Entomol. 45(4) :747.

Schomberg, 0. D., and D. E. Howell. 1955. Biological notes on Tabanus abactor Philip and equalis Hine. J. Econ. Entomol. 48(5):6l8-619 .

Schwardt, H. H. 1931. The biology of Tabanus lineola Fabr. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 24:409-416.

Schwardt, H. H. 1936. Horse flies of Arkansas. Ark. Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. No. 332. 66 pp.

Sheppard, D. C., B. M. Wilson, and J. A. Hawkins. 1973. A devise for self-marking of Tabanidae. Environ. Ento­mol. 2:960-961.

94

Sheppard, C., B. H. Wilson, B. R. Farthing. 1980. Flight routs of Tabanidae in a Louisiana bottomland hardwood forest. Environ. Entomol. 2(5):489-491.

Steelman, C. D. 1976. Effects of external and internal arthropods on domestic livestock production. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 21 : 155-178.

Steyskal, G. C. 1981. A bibliography of the Malaise trap. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 83(2):225-229.

Stone, A. 1930. The bionomics of some Tabanidae (Diptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 23:261-274.

Tashiro, H., and H. H. Schwardt. 1949. Biology of the major species of horse flies of central New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 42(2) :269-272.

•Tashiro, H., and H. H. Schwardt. 1953. Biological studies of horse flies in New York. J. Econ. Entomol. 46(5):8l3-822.

Teskey, H. J. 1969. Larvae and pupae of some eastern North American Tabanidae (Diptera). Mem. Entomol. Soc. Can. 63:1-147.

Thompson, P. H. 1969. Collecting methods for Tabanidae (Diptera). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62(1):50-57.

Thompson, P. H. 1973a. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, I. Costal marsh species. West Galvaston Bay; Incidence, frequency, abundance and seasonal distribution. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 75(3) : 359-364.

Thompson, P. H. 1973b. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, II. Pine Belt species, Huntsville State Park; Incidence, frequency, abundance and seasonal distribution. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 75(4) : 430-435.

Thompson, P. H. 1974a. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, III. Post Oak Belt species, Navasota River watershed; Inci­dence, frequency, abundance and seasonal distribution. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 76(1):35-38.

Thompson, P. H. 1974b. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, IV. Pine Belt species, the big thicket; Incidence, fre­quency, abundance and seasonal distribution. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 76(3) : 315-321 .

95

Thompson, P. H. 1976. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, V. second year collections from the Huntsville State Park and the Navasota River Watershed. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 78(3):376-381 .

Thompson, P. H. 1978. Parasitism of adult Tabanus sub-similis subsimilis Bellardi (Diptera: TabanidaeTTy a

' multigrammine sarcophagid (Diptera: Sarcophagidae). Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 80(1):67-74.

Thompson, P. H., R. R. Blume, and A. Aga. 1977. Tabanidae (Diptera) of Texas, VI. Costal Prairie species, Victo­ria County. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 79(2):266-269 .

Thompson, P. H., and C. V. Love. 1979. Potential of a mul­tigrammine sarcophagid in biological control of taban­ids. Southwest. Entomol. 4(4) :298-303.

Thompson, P. H., S. M. Meola, and J. M. Thompson. 1980. Dead-end parasitism of bombyliid larvae in tabanid adults. Southwest. Entomol. 5(1):12-15.

Thornhill, A. R., and K. L. Hays. 1972. Dispersal and flight activities of some species of Tabanus (Diptera: Tabanidae). Environ. Entomol. 1 :602-606.

Thorsteinson, A. J., G. K. Bracken, and W. Hanec. 1964. The Manitoba horse fly trap. Can. Entomol. 96:166.

Tidwell, M. A., W. D. Dean, G. P. Combs, D. W. Anderson, W. 0. Cowart, and R. C. Axtell. 1972. Transmission of hog cholera virus by horseflies (Tabanidae: Diptera). Am. J. Vet. Res. 33(3):6l5-622.

Turner, E. C , and R. R. Gerhardt. 1965. A material for rapid marking of face flies for dispersal studies. J. Econ. Entomol. 58:584-585.

U.S. Environmental Data Service. 1981a. Climatological Data, Annual Summary: Texas. Ashville, N.C., National Climatic Center. 86(13) 32 pp.

U.S. Environmental Data Service. 1981b. Climatological Data: Texas. Ashville, N.C., National Climatic Center 87(1-12) 781 pp.

Web J. L., and R. W. Wells. 1924. Horseflies: biologies ' and relation to western agricultures. U.S.D.A. Bull. No. 1218. 36 pp.

96

Wilson, B. H. 1969. Tabanid larval habitats and population densities in an Alluvial area in southern Louisiana. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 62(5) : 1203-1204.

Wilson, B. H., E. C. Burns, W. T. Oglesby, R. B. Meyer, T. E. Rogers, and J. Wimblery. 1963. The effect of horse fly control on rate of infection of bovine anaplasmosis under field conditions in Louisiana. J. Econ. Entomol. 56:578-579.

Wilson, B. H., and R. B. Meyer. 1966. Transmission studies of bovine anaplasmosis with horseflies, Tabanus fasci-costatus and Tabanus nigrovittatus. Am. J. Vet. Res. 27(114) :367-3^T:

Wilson, N. L., J. E. Huston, and D. I. Davis. 1978. Effec­tiveness of stirofos impregnated ear tags for control of horn flies and horse flies on cattle in central Texas. Southwest. Vet. ^1(^ ) : 1Q7-19Q . 01 norn iiies ana norse iiies on cauLie Texas. Southwest. Vet. 31(3) : 197-199 .