biology - los angeles mission college 23 - lecture/ch… · fig. 23-6 frequencies of alleles...

103
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings PowerPoint ® Lecture Presentations for Biology Eighth Edition Neil Campbell and Jane Reece Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp Chapter 23 The Evolution of Populations

Upload: others

Post on 25-Jan-2021

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    PowerPoint® Lecture Presentations for

    BiologyEighth Edition

    Neil Campbell and Jane Reece

    Lectures by Chris Romero, updated by Erin Barley with contributions from Joan Sharp

    Chapter 23

    The Evolution of Populations

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Overview: The Smallest Unit of Evolution

    • One misconception is that organisms evolve, in

    the Darwinian sense, during their lifetimes

    • Natural selection acts on individuals, but only

    populations evolve

    • Genetic variations in populations contribute to

    evolution

    • Microevolution is a change in allele

    frequencies in a population over generations

  • Fig. 23-1

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Two processes, mutation and sexual

    reproduction, produce the variation in gene

    pools that contributes to differences among

    individuals

    Concept 23.1: Mutation and sexual reproduction produce the genetic variation that makes evolution possible

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Genetic Variation

    • Variation in individual genotype leads to

    variation in individual phenotype

    • Not all phenotypic variation is heritable

    • Natural selection can only act on variation with

    a genetic component

  • Fig. 23-2

    (a) (b)

  • Fig. 23-2a

    (a)

  • Fig. 23-2b

    (b)

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Variation Within a Population

    • Both discrete and quantitative characters

    contribute to variation within a population

    • Discrete characters can be classified on an

    either-or basis

    • Quantitative characters vary along a continuum

    within a population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Population geneticists measure polymorphisms

    in a population by determining the amount of

    heterozygosity at the gene and molecular

    levels

    • Average heterozygosity measures the

    average percent of loci that are heterozygous

    in a population

    • Nucleotide variability is measured by

    comparing the DNA sequences of pairs of

    individuals

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Variation Between Populations

    • Most species exhibit geographic variation,

    differences between gene pools of separate

    populations or population subgroups

  • Fig. 23-3

    13.17 19 XX10.169.128.11

    1 2.4 3.14 5.18 6 7.15

    9.10

    1 2.19

    11.12 13.17 15.18

    3.8 4.16 5.14 6.7

    XX

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Some examples of geographic variation occur

    as a cline, which is a graded change in a trait

    along a geographic axis

  • Fig. 23-4

    1.0

    0.8

    0.6

    0.4

    0.2

    046 44 42 40 38 36 34 32 30

    GeorgiaWarm (21°C)

    Latitude (°N)

    MaineCold (6°C)

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Mutation

    • Mutations are changes in the nucleotide

    sequence of DNA

    • Mutations cause new genes and alleles to arise

    • Only mutations in cells that produce gametes

    can be passed to offspring

    Genetic Variation from Sexual Recombination

    Chap 23 - Sexual Recombination.html

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Point Mutations

    • A point mutation is a change in one base in a

    gene

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • The effects of point mutations can vary:

    – Mutations in noncoding regions of DNA are

    often harmless

    – Mutations in a gene might not affect protein

    production because of redundancy in the

    genetic code

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • The effects of point mutations can vary:

    – Mutations that result in a change in protein

    production are often harmful

    – Mutations that result in a change in protein

    production can sometimes increase the fit

    between organism and environment

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Mutations That Alter Gene Number or Sequence

    • Chromosomal mutations that delete, disrupt, or

    rearrange many loci are typically harmful

    • Duplication of large chromosome segments is

    usually harmful

    • Duplication of small pieces of DNA is

    sometimes less harmful and increases the

    genome size

    • Duplicated genes can take on new functions by

    further mutation

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Mutation Rates

    • Mutation rates are low in animals and plants

    • The average is about one mutation in every

    100,000 genes per generation

    • Mutations rates are often lower in prokaryotes

    and higher in viruses

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Sexual Reproduction

    • Sexual reproduction can shuffle existing alleles

    into new combinations

    • In organisms that reproduce sexually,

    recombination of alleles is more important than

    mutation in producing the genetic differences

    that make adaptation possible

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Concept 23.2: The Hardy-Weinberg equation can be used to test whether a population is evolving

    • The first step in testing whether evolution is

    occurring in a population is to clarify what we

    mean by a population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Gene Pools and Allele Frequencies

    • A population is a localized group of individuals

    capable of interbreeding and producing fertile

    offspring

    • A gene pool consists of all the alleles for all

    loci in a population

    • A locus is fixed if all individuals in a population

    are homozygous for the same allele

  • Fig. 23-5Porcupine herd

    Porcupineherd range

    Beaufort Sea

    MAPAREA

    Fortymileherd range

    Fortymile herd

  • Fig. 23-5a

    Porcupineherd range

    Beaufort Sea

    MAP

    AREA

    Fortymileherd range

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • The frequency of an allele in a population can

    be calculated

    – For diploid organisms, the total number of

    alleles at a locus is the total number of

    individuals x 2

    – The total number of dominant alleles at a locus

    is 2 alleles for each homozygous dominant

    individual plus 1 allele for each heterozygous

    individual; the same logic applies for recessive

    alleles

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • By convention, if there are 2 alleles at a locus,

    p and q are used to represent their frequencies

    • The frequency of all alleles in a population will

    add up to 1

    – For example, p + q = 1

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    The Hardy-Weinberg Principle

    • The Hardy-Weinberg principle describes a

    population that is not evolving

    • If a population does not meet the criteria of the

    Hardy-Weinberg principle, it can be concluded

    that the population is evolving

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

    • The Hardy-Weinberg principle states that

    frequencies of alleles and genotypes in a

    population remain constant from generation to

    generation

    • In a given population where gametes contribute

    to the next generation randomly, allele

    frequencies will not change

    • Mendelian inheritance preserves genetic

    variation in a population

  • Fig. 23-6

    Frequencies of alleles

    Alleles in the population

    Gametes produced

    Each egg: Each sperm:

    80%chance

    80%chance

    20%chance

    20%chance

    q = frequency of

    p = frequency of

    CR allele = 0.8

    CW allele = 0.2

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium describes the constant frequency of alleles in such a gene pool

    • If p and q represent the relative frequencies of the only two possible alleles in a population at a particular locus, then

    – p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1

    – where p2 and q2 represent the frequencies of the homozygous genotypes and 2pqrepresents the frequency of the heterozygous genotype

  • Fig. 23-7-1

    Sperm

    CR

    (80%)

    80% CR (p = 0.8)

    CW

    (20%)

    20% CW (q = 0.2)

    16% (pq)

    CRCW

    4% (q2)

    CW CW

    64% (p2)

    CRCR

    16% (qp)

    CRCW

  • Fig. 23-7-2

    Gametes of this generation:

    64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW

    64% CR + 16% CR = 80% CR = 0.8 = p

    4% CW + 16% CW = 20% CW = 0.2 = q

  • Fig. 23-7-3

    Gametes of this generation:

    64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW

    64% CR + 16% CR = 80% CR = 0.8 = p

    4% CW + 16% CW = 20% CW = 0.2 = q

    64% CRCR, 32% CRCW, and 4% CWCW plants

    Genotypes in the next generation:

  • Fig. 23-7-4

    Gametes of this generation:

    64% CR CR, 32% CR CW, and 4% CW CW

    64% CR + 16% CR = 80% CR = 0.8 = p

    4% CW + 16% CW = 20% CW = 0.2 = q

    64% CR CR, 32% CR CW, and 4% CW CW plants

    Genotypes in the next generation:

    Sperm

    CR

    (80%)

    80% CR ( p = 0.8)

    CW

    (20%)

    20% CW (q = 0.2)

    16% ( pq)

    CR CW

    4% (q2)

    CW CW

    64% ( p2)

    CR CR

    16% (qp)

    CR CW

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Conditions for Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium

    • The Hardy-Weinberg theorem describes a

    hypothetical population

    • In real populations, allele and genotype

    frequencies do change over time

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • The five conditions for nonevolving populations

    are rarely met in nature:

    – No mutations

    – Random mating

    – No natural selection

    – Extremely large population size

    – No gene flow

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Natural populations can evolve at some loci,

    while being in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium at

    other loci

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Applying the Hardy-Weinberg Principle

    • We can assume the locus that causes phenylketonuria (PKU) is in Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium given that:

    – The PKU gene mutation rate is low

    – Mate selection is random with respect to whether or not an individual is a carrier for the PKU allele

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    – Natural selection can only act on rare homozygous individuals who do not follow dietary restrictions

    – The population is large

    – Migration has no effect as many other populations have similar allele frequencies

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • The occurrence of PKU is 1 per 10,000 births

    – q2 = 0.0001

    – q = 0.01

    • The frequency of normal alleles is

    – p = 1 – q = 1 – 0.01 = 0.99

    • The frequency of carriers is

    – 2pq = 2 x 0.99 x 0.01 = 0.0198

    – or approximately 2% of the U.S. population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Three major factors alter allele frequencies and

    bring about most evolutionary change:

    – Natural selection

    – Genetic drift

    – Gene flow

    Concept 23.3: Natural selection, genetic drift, and gene flow can alter allele frequencies in a population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Natural Selection

    • Differential success in reproduction results in

    certain alleles being passed to the next

    generation in greater proportions

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Genetic Drift

    • The smaller a sample, the greater the chance

    of deviation from a predicted result

    • Genetic drift describes how allele frequencies

    fluctuate unpredictably from one generation to

    the next

    • Genetic drift tends to reduce genetic variation

    through losses of alleles

    Causes of Evolutionary Change

    Chap 23 - Evolutionary Changes.html

  • Fig. 23-8-1

    Generation 1

    p (frequency of CR) = 0.7

    q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

    CW CW

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CR CW

  • Fig. 23-8-2

    Generation 1

    p (frequency of CR) = 0.7

    q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

    Generation 2

    p = 0.5

    q = 0.5

    CW CW

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CR CWCR CW

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CW CW

    CW CW

    CW CW

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

  • Fig. 23-8-3

    Generation 1

    CW CW

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CR CW

    p (frequency of CR) = 0.7

    q (frequency of CW) = 0.3

    Generation 2

    CR CWCR CW

    CR CW

    CR CW

    CW CW

    CW CW

    CW CW

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    p = 0.5

    q = 0.5

    Generation 3

    p = 1.0

    q = 0.0

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR CR CR

    CR CR

    CR CR CR CR

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    The Founder Effect

    • The founder effect occurs when a few

    individuals become isolated from a larger

    population

    • Allele frequencies in the small founder

    population can be different from those in the

    larger parent population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    The Bottleneck Effect

    • The bottleneck effect is a sudden reduction in

    population size due to a change in the

    environment

    • The resulting gene pool may no longer be

    reflective of the original population’s gene pool

    • If the population remains small, it may be

    further affected by genetic drift

  • Fig. 23-9

    Originalpopulation

    Bottleneckingevent

    Survivingpopulation

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Understanding the bottleneck effect can

    increase understanding of how human activity

    affects other species

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Case Study: Impact of Genetic Drift on the Greater Prairie Chicken

    • Loss of prairie habitat caused a severe

    reduction in the population of greater prairie

    chickens in Illinois

    • The surviving birds had low levels of genetic

    variation, and only 50% of their eggs hatched

  • Fig. 23-10

    Numberof allelesper locus

    Rangeof greaterprairiechicken

    Pre-bottleneck(Illinois, 1820)

    Post-bottleneck(Illinois, 1993)

    Minnesota, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Nebraska, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Kansas, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Illinois

    1930–1960s

    1993

    Location Populationsize

    Percentageof eggshatched

    1,000–25,000

  • Fig. 23-10a

    Rangeof greaterprairiechicken

    Pre-bottleneck(Illinois, 1820)

    Post-bottleneck(Illinois, 1993)

    (a)

  • Fig. 23-10b

    Numberof allelesper locus

    Minnesota, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Nebraska, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Kansas, 1998(no bottleneck)

    Illinois

    1930–1960s

    1993

    LocationPopulationsize

    Percentageof eggshatched

    1,000–25,000

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Researchers used DNA from museum

    specimens to compare genetic variation in the

    population before and after the bottleneck

    • The results showed a loss of alleles at several

    loci

    • Researchers introduced greater prairie

    chickens from population in other states and

    were successful in introducing new alleles and

    increasing the egg hatch rate to 90%

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Effects of Genetic Drift: A Summary

    1. Genetic drift is significant in small populations

    2. Genetic drift causes allele frequencies to

    change at random

    3. Genetic drift can lead to a loss of genetic

    variation within populations

    4. Genetic drift can cause harmful alleles to

    become fixed

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Gene Flow

    • Gene flow consists of the movement of alleles

    among populations

    • Alleles can be transferred through the

    movement of fertile individuals or gametes (for

    example, pollen)

    • Gene flow tends to reduce differences between

    populations over time

    • Gene flow is more likely than mutation to alter

    allele frequencies directly

  • Fig. 23-11

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Gene flow can decrease the fitness of a population

    • In bent grass, alleles for copper tolerance are beneficial in populations near copper mines, but harmful to populations in other soils

    • Windblown pollen moves these alleles between populations

    • The movement of unfavorable alleles into a population results in a decrease in fit between organism and environment

  • Fig. 23-12

    NON-

    MINE

    SOIL

    MINE

    SOIL

    NON-

    MINE

    SOIL

    Prevailing wind direction

    Distance from mine edge (meters)

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    020 0 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

  • Fig. 23-12a

    NON-MINESOIL

    MINESOIL

    NON-MINESOIL

    Prevailing wind direction

    Distance from mine edge (meters)

    70

    60

    50

    40

    30

    20

    10

    020 0 20 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160

  • Fig. 23-12b

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Gene flow can increase the fitness of a population

    • Insecticides have been used to target mosquitoes that carry West Nile virus and malaria

    • Alleles have evolved in some populations that confer insecticide resistance to these mosquitoes

    • The flow of insecticide resistance alleles into a population can cause an increase in fitness

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Only natural selection consistently results in

    adaptive evolution

    Concept 23.4: Natural selection is the only mechanism that consistently causes adaptive evolution

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    A Closer Look at Natural Selection

    • Natural selection brings about adaptive

    evolution by acting on an organism’s

    phenotype

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Relative Fitness

    • The phrases “struggle for existence” and

    “survival of the fittest” are misleading as they

    imply direct competition among individuals

    • Reproductive success is generally more subtle

    and depends on many factors

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Relative fitness is the contribution an

    individual makes to the gene pool of the next

    generation, relative to the contributions of other

    individuals

    • Selection favors certain genotypes by acting on

    the phenotypes of certain organisms

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Directional, Disruptive, and Stabilizing Selection

    • Three modes of selection:

    – Directional selection favors individuals at one

    end of the phenotypic range

    – Disruptive selection favors individuals at both

    extremes of the phenotypic range

    – Stabilizing selection favors intermediate

    variants and acts against extreme phenotypes

  • Fig. 23-13

    Original population

    (c) Stabilizing

    selection

    (b) Disruptive selection(a) Directional selection

    Phenotypes (fur color)Originalpopulation

    Evolvedpopulation

  • Fig. 23-13a

    Original population

    (a) Directional selection

    Phenotypes (fur color)

    Original population

    Evolved population

  • Fig. 23-13b

    Original population

    (b) Disruptive selection

    Phenotypes (fur color)

    Evolved population

  • Fig. 23-13c

    Original population

    (c) Stabilizing selection

    Phenotypes (fur color)

    Evolved population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    The Key Role of Natural Selection in Adaptive Evolution

    • Natural selection increases the frequencies of

    alleles that enhance survival and reproduction

    • Adaptive evolution occurs as the match

    between an organism and its environment

    increases

  • Fig. 23-14

    (a) Color-changing ability in cuttlefish

    (b) Movable jawbones insnakes

    Movable bones

  • Fig. 23-14a

    (a) Color-changing ability in cuttlefish

  • Fig. 23-14b

    (b) Movable jawbones insnakes

    Movable bones

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Because the environment can change,

    adaptive evolution is a continuous process

    • Genetic drift and gene flow do not consistently

    lead to adaptive evolution as they can increase

    or decrease the match between an organism

    and its environment

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Sexual Selection

    • Sexual selection is natural selection for

    mating success

    • It can result in sexual dimorphism, marked

    differences between the sexes in secondary

    sexual characteristics

  • Fig. 23-15

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Intrasexual selection is competition among individuals of one sex (often males) for mates of the opposite sex

    • Intersexual selection, often called mate choice, occurs when individuals of one sex (usually females) are choosy in selecting their mates

    • Male showiness due to mate choice can increase a male’s chances of attracting a female, while decreasing his chances of survival

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • How do female preferences evolve?

    • The good genes hypothesis suggests that if a

    trait is related to male health, both the male

    trait and female preference for that trait should

    be selected for

  • Fig. 23-16

    SC male graytree frog

    Female graytree frog

    LC male graytree frog

    EXPERIMENT

    SC sperm Eggs LC sperm

    Offspring ofLC father

    Offspring ofSC father

    Fitness of these half-sibling offspring compared

    RESULTS

    1995Fitness Measure 1996

    Larval growth

    Larval survival

    Time to metamorphosis

    LC better

    NSD

    LC better(shorter)

    LC better(shorter)

    NSD

    LC better

    NSD = no significant difference; LC better = offspring of LC males

    superior to offspring of SC males.

  • Fig. 23-16a

    SC male graytree frog

    Female graytree frog

    LC male graytree frog

    SC sperm Eggs LC sperm

    Offspring ofLC father

    Offspring ofSC father

    Fitness of these half-sibling offspring compared

    EXPERIMENT

  • Fig. 23-16b

    RESULTS

    1995Fitness Measure 1996

    Larval growth

    Larval survival

    Time to metamorphosis

    LC better

    NSD

    LC better(shorter)

    LC better(shorter)

    NSD

    LC better

    NSD = no significant difference; LC better = offspring of LC males

    superior to offspring of SC males.

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    The Preservation of Genetic Variation

    • Various mechanisms help to preserve genetic

    variation in a population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Diploidy

    • Diploidy maintains genetic variation in the form

    of hidden recessive alleles

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Balancing Selection

    • Balancing selection occurs when natural

    selection maintains stable frequencies of two or

    more phenotypic forms in a population

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • Heterozygote advantage occurs when

    heterozygotes have a higher fitness than do

    both homozygotes

    • Natural selection will tend to maintain two or

    more alleles at that locus

    • The sickle-cell allele causes mutations in

    hemoglobin but also confers malaria resistance

    Heterozygote Advantage

  • Fig. 23-17

    0–2.5%

    Distribution ofmalaria caused byPlasmodium falciparum(a parasitic unicellular eukaryote)

    Frequencies of thesickle-cell allele

    2.5–5.0%

    7.5–10.0%

    5.0–7.5%

    >12.5%

    10.0–12.5%

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    • In frequency-dependent selection, the

    fitness of a phenotype declines if it becomes

    too common in the population

    • Selection can favor whichever phenotype is

    less common in a population

    Frequency-Dependent Selection

  • Fig. 23-18

    “Right-mouthed”

    1981

    “Left-mouthed”

    Sample year

    1.0

    0.5

    0’82 ’83 ’84 ’85 ’86 ’87 ’88 ’89 ’90

  • Fig. 23-18a

    “Right-mouthed”

    “Left-mouthed”

  • Fig. 23-18b

    1981

    Sample year

    1.0

    0.5

    0’82 ’83 ’84 ’85 ’86 ’87 ’88 ’89 ’90

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Neutral Variation

    • Neutral variation is genetic variation that

    appears to confer no selective advantage or

    disadvantage

    • For example,

    – Variation in noncoding regions of DNA

    – Variation in proteins that have little effect on

    protein function or reproductive fitness

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    Why Natural Selection Cannot Fashion Perfect Organisms

    1. Selection can act only on existing variations

    2. Evolution is limited by historical constraints

    3. Adaptations are often compromises

    4. Chance, natural selection, and the

    environment interact

  • Fig. 23-19

  • Fig. 23-UN1

    Stabilizingselection

    Originalpopulation

    Evolvedpopulation

    Directionalselection

    Disruptiveselection

  • Fig. 23-UN2

    Sampling sites(1–8 representpairs of sites)

    Salinity increases toward the open ocean

    N

    Long IslandSound

    Allelefrequencies

    AtlanticOcean

    Other lap alleleslap94 alleles

    Data from R.K. Koehn and T.J. Hilbish, The adaptive importance of genetic variation,American Scientist 75:134–141 (1987).

    E

    S

    W

    1 2 3 4 5 9 106 7 8 11

    1

    11

    10

    2 34 5

    6 78

    9

  • Fig. 23-UN3

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    You should now be able to:

    1. Explain why the majority of point mutations are

    harmless

    2. Explain how sexual recombination generates genetic

    variability

    3. Define the terms population, species, gene pool,

    relative fitness, and neutral variation

    4. List the five conditions of Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    5. Apply the Hardy-Weinberg equation to a population

    genetics problem

    6. Explain why natural selection is the only mechanism

    that consistently produces adaptive change

    7. Explain the role of population size in genetic drift

  • Copyright © 2008 Pearson Education Inc., publishing as Pearson Benjamin Cummings

    8. Distinguish among the following sets of terms:

    directional, disruptive, and stabilizing selection;

    intrasexual and intersexual selection

    9. List four reasons why natural selection cannot

    produce perfect organisms