blast simulation of vault door as per en 1143-1 · pdf fileyour logo here 6 • need for...
TRANSCRIPT
•Satish Ramavat
•Devidas Thorat
•Prashant C.
Date – 25 July, 2016
Godrej Security Solution Division
Godrej & Boyce Mfg. Co. Ltd., Mumbai
‘ Blast Simulation of Vault Door As Per EN 1143-1'
Your
logo
here 2
LINES OF BUSINESS
Physical Security Products
Record Protecting Equipment
Burglar & Fire Resistant Safes
Vault Equipment
Vault Accessories
Currency Handling Solutions
Premises Security Solutions
Crash Rated Barriers
Under Vehicle Surveillance Systems
Baggage Scanners
Hand Held Metal Detectors
Surveillance Solutions
Fire Alarm Systems
Burglar Alarm Systems
Monitoring Solutions
Scanning and Screening Solutions
Retail Solutions
Home Safes
Video Door Phones
CCTV Cameras
Burglar Alarm Systems
Marine Solutions
Steel and Aluminium Doors
Cargo Hatches
WT/GT/Weather Tight Steel Doors
Your
logo
here 4
• Construction of Vault door:
• It consists of frame, door leaf and
mechanism for locking.
• Frame and door leaf are filled with concrete
barrier to provide the protection against any
attack.
• Frame is used to fix vault door with wall of
vault room.
• Intended function:
• Vault door is designed to protect against the
burglary attack and also provide the access
to vault room.
Introduction:
Door Leaf
Locking
Bolts
Frame
Hinge
Your
logo
here 6
• Need for Simulation:
• The vault door was to be tested against explosion attack as per EN 1143-1, hence there
is a need to evaluate the performance of door against specified explosive attack before
actual test.
• To optimise the door design and thus eliminate the testing iterations which are very
expensive.
• Scope for Simulation:
• Analyse the effect of detonation of explosive placed in gap between frame and door.
• Visualization of blast wave propagation and its effect on different parts.
• Identify the forces and stresses at different locations.
• Effect of blast on mechanism parts like locking bolts, linkages and etc.
Blast Simulation of Vault door:
Your
logo
here 7
FEM Details
• Hexahedral elements used for air and
explosive modelling.
• Shell elements used for door and frame.
• Concrete metal rebar’s are modelled as
beam elements.
• Type 18 contacts used between Air and
explosive.
Your
logo
here 9
Material details:
Yield Stress (y) (a) :250 MPa
Tensile Strength :410 MPa
Elongation at Fracture (EPS_max) :23 %
Modulus of Elasticity (E) :210 GPa
Mass Density () :7810 kg/m3
Poisson’s Ratio () :0.29
Material : IS 2062 E250 Gr.B0
Card image: M2_plas_johns_Zeril
Compressive strength (fc) :150 MPa
Density () :2900 Kg/m3
Flexure strength :12 Mpa
EPS (Max) : 0.5%
Material : Concrete
Card image: M24_Conc
Your
logo
here 10
Boundary Condition:
• The frame (left picture) are fixed in all DOFs to replicate the test
conditions (right picture).
Your
logo
here 11
PETN- 285 g
Explosive details:
Door Leaf
Frame
TNT Explosive :
Mass density (ρ) : 1500 Kg/m3
Detonation velocity (v) : 7000 m/s
Chapman-Jouget pressure : 16 GPa
Internal energy density (E0) : 10.1 GPa
Material constants of
JWL – EQS for TNT :
ω : 0.25
A : 617 GPa
B : 16.926 GPa
R1 : 4.4
R2 : 1.1
Your
logo
here 12
Challenges faced:
• Concrete modelling– We modelled the steel bar reinforcement as beam
elements to get realistic result and study its behaviour.
• Modelling of explosive into the gaps – Since it is a small gap in Z shapes
couple of iterations were involved to get convergence
• Contacts and interface – Adjusting contact stiffness to model the interface
behaviour
Your
logo
here 16
Results & Discussion:
• Frame and door damaged only in area near to explosive, rest area was
considerably intact, same was also observed during actual test.
• Maximum force is observed in the locking bolt which falls into blast
wave path. In actual test two locking bolts (in centre) are dislocated.
• Due to induced force or vibration toughened glass has broken as
desired.
• Actual test results are very much similar to simulation results.
Your
logo
here 17
Benefits Summary:
• Analysis helps to optimise the door design before actual test, this
reduces the cost by eliminating iterative testing's.
• Reduced development cycle time and cost and time to market
Your
logo
here 18
Conclusion:
• This study has shown that the predictive capability for blast wave
propagation and its effect on door design is quite good with Radioss
non-linear explicit analysis. In addition, Altair provided the scope for
iteration with every design change to ensure the intended performance.
• With such good correlation between simulation and actual test results,
testing laboratory also exploring the option of evaluating the design on
the basis of simulation results only rather than going for actual test in
each case.
Your
logo
here 19
Acknowledgments:
• We would like to acknowledge our company M/s. Godrej and Boyce Mfg.
Co. Ltd. Security Solutions Division and
Altair’s Technical support
• Mr. Swasthik Bangera
• Mr. Prashant Kulkarni
• Mr. Vasantha Kumar