bomos in e-sens - home | joinup · matrimonial matters and parental responsibility ... e-sens is an...
TRANSCRIPT
e-SENSElectronic Simple European Networked Services
BOMOS in e-SENSUsing the BoMOS model in day2day practice, June 23rd 2015.Xander van der Linde, Marijke Salters, Bertrand.Gré[email protected]
e-Justice primary use cases
Matrimonial matters and parental responsibilityMaintenance ObligationsEuropean Account Preservation Order
facilitation of the resolution of legal issues across national borders
making easier either cross-border court-to-court or cross-border court-to-citizen communications involving electronic signing and secure transmission of electronic documents
eDelivery
Cross border cases for:
e-Health – easier access to health services while abroad
e-Justice – electronic issuing of a claim in a foreign court
e-Procurement – electronic bidding in other EU countries
business lifecycle – online completion of formalities for company setup abroad
and more: e-citizen lifecycle, maritime e-cooperation, e-agriculture
Real life scenarios
5
eDocumentseId
semantics
eSignature
major building blocks
Formal standards (ETSI, CEN) & non-formal specifications (OASIS, W3C,…)reference implementation (Join-Up)community of users & support
Re-using LSP solutions
e-CODEX “e-Justice Communication via Online Data EXchange”epSOS “European Patients Smart Open Services”SPOCS “Simple Procedures Online for Cross-border Services”
finished
STORK “Secure idenTity acrOss boRders linKed”continued by STORK 2.0
PEPPOL “Pan European Public Procurement OnLinefinished: maintained by OpenPEPPOL
All projects run with existing national back office systems
7
Consolidate, improve, extend
e-SENS
- Consolidates the results of LSP projects- Improves solutions and develops generic
modules- Extends their usage to more domains
aims at a coherent infrastructure vision& links to the future
8
e-SENSElectronic Simple European Networked Services
Introduction of Workpackage 3 of eSENS – Governance & Sustainability
What sustainability is to us
10
Long term (10+y) consolidation and maintenance of building blocks.● Building Blocks (BB) lifecycle (assessment, improvement,
operations)● governance (principles, structure & legal form)● financing (rationales & business case)
many external dependencies● developments in the framework of eIDAS Regulation, ● Connecting Europe Facility (CEF)● eGovernment Expert Group.
Sustainable Building Blocks
11
Assessing the sustainability of Building BlocksAssessment framework with 3 main assessment criteria:
● Standardization (technical maturity, openness, IPR, lifecycle management, maintenance, service levels, security)
● Policy Alignment (interoperability, compliance, member states, legal, data protection, applicability, potential)
● Market/business need (business need by users, market support by implementers)
assessment framework building on● CAMSS (Common Assessment Method for Standards and
Specifications) from EC ISA program● ADMS (Asset Description Metadata Scheme)● Specific sustainability requirements from eSENS
First formal sustainability assessment cycle
eSignature:• EU eSignature Standards Framework • Stork 2 signature creation• eCodex trust library• PEPPOL eSignature verification• Digitial Signature ServiceeDelivery:
• Transport ebMS3 and AS4• Metadata service location• Addressing ebCore partyID• Service Metadata Publisher• Representational State TransfereDocuments:
• Omnifarious Container for eDocuments• Virtual Company Dossier• Associated Signature ContainereID:
• Personal identity attributes• Security Assertion Markup Language• Quality Authentication Assurance Levels• Online Certificate Status Protocol profile
What has been assessed?MaturityOpennessAlignment with existing policiesIPRLife cycle managementApplicabilityMarket support
Appreciation of ABBs:Ready for public consultation
Adjustment / further piloting needed
e-SENS is an EU co-funded project under the ICT PSP
Before e-SENS (in the LSP)
Governance (legacy)
lack of long-term governance perspective, except for Open PeppolGovernance was considered withing the domainprojects-oriented approach -> no long term strategies and organizationsTransparency only to for those within
preferences on governance & sustainability
17
EC EC private private
private sector private MS private
deciding funding operating
Member States MS EC private
To what extent is a European IT governance structure for BB DSIs perceived as necessary?
In which way can your country voice a single coherent position in eGovernment cross-border and cross-domain interoperability functions/activities?
21/05/2015 e-SENS WP318
8%
73%
12%
4% 4% Already achieved Requires national coordination with many involved organiza-tionsRequires some l ight national coordination with a few iden-tified indi vidua lsCurrently imposs ible (please expla in)Already achieved, Requires national coordination with many involved organizations
What are the preferred features of a governance structure, for now and in the long term?
Which principles should be preferred when a function/activity will be governed at European level?
1. Active involvement of MS in the process; 2. Clarity of responsibility and accountability for different tasks between the
stakeholders;3. Keeping in mind the construction of a European interoperability ecosystem; 4. Ease of use by the administrations and businesses.
21/05/2015 e-SENS WP319
more efficient alignment efforts
aim of the ecosystem is to provide cross-domain services, enabled by BBs.
more efficient alignment efforts
aim of the ecosystem is to provide cross-domain services, enabled by BBs.
central "agora" to coordinate efforts
coordinate (here) = to align relevant (local) decisions and share knowledge proactively
with added value
High-Level value network of the eco-system fordomain public services (black) and cross-domain (blue)
4 Guiding principles
Four guidelines to add these values at low cost• Subsidiarity• Reciprocity• Transparency• Flexibility
added value from improved Knowledge Sharing
4 Guiding principles
Origins of these principles:• EU & Australian Public Bodies Governance good
practices guides• Permaculture
IT Governance of CEF BB DSIs
Non-paper on the IT Governance of CEF Building Block Digital Service Infrastructures (DSIs)
Requirements for sustainabilityIn order to further lock in the benefits of addressing the critical success factors and to make it sustainable, the processes and procedures that enable the governance and linked implementation should ensure the following: That the fundamental principles of the EU mandate are respected: Conferral, Subsidiarity and Proportionality; That core value of the EU are respected in both the approach to governance and the resulting solutions: Openness, transparency and inclusiveness; That the stakeholder representation and taking into consideration of their needs is locked in.;That the governance decisions are implemented.
Deloitte report on Cross-Border Services
Confirms both principles AND the use of BOMOS
Krechmer Criteria on Openness
● Open Meeting: All stakeholders can participate in the development process ● Consensus: All interests were discussed and agreement reached no domination. ● Due Process: Balloting and an appeals procedure may be used for the definitive solution. ● Open IPR: IPR (intellectual propertyrights) in relation to the standard are available for those
using it. ● One World: Univocal definition of the standard, worldwide ● Open Change: All changes are proposed and agreed in a forum supporting the five rights
above. ● Open Documentation: Draft documents of the committee or other consultative groups and
completed documents about the standard are readily available for implementation and use ● Open Interface: An open interface supports migration and makes it possible to market
private label versions. The standardized interfaces are not hidden or controlled. ● Open use: There are objective conformity checks and mechanisms for implementation
testing and user evaluation. ● Continuity in Support: Standards are supported until use of the standard ceases, instead of
support until the suppliers lose interest
BOMOS was not intended for:
● an ecosystem of organisations – coordination more than governance
● SBB’s → Open Peppol did a check● Detailed RFC processes → maybe ITIL??
– (even) more (& good) service provisioning framework, less inter-organisation governance
– close to no business development/market adoption focus
● For every situation → translation for each context– trade-off between flexibility (~shopping list) and structure
● in general OPENNESS is not garanteed, needs attention through the entire process– what's open: participation? decision making? process? result?
E-SENS Objective in relation to BOMOS
1. Clear and efficient decision-making process● BOMOS2i page: 15 Decision making
2. Involvement LSP’s ● BOMOS2i page: 15 participation
3. Stakeholders involvement● BOMOS2i page 15 stakeholder analysis (NEN)
Discussions
● Contribute assessment model (back) to CAMSS● Interesting putting ethics at the heart of design● How to discuss reciprocity in public bodies and with
businesses?
● Want to discuss in particular some of the changes we made to BOMOS?
● How to collaborate with other existing standardisation structures (& their workflow/requirements)
● Should there be a BOMOS-light, with less activities?
e-SENSElectronic Simple European Networked Services
BOMOS in e-SENSThank you!
Xander van der Linde, Marijke Salters, Bertrand.Gré[email protected]