breaking the trade-off between efficiency and service

12
1 Breaking the Trade-Off Between Efficiency and Service Manufacturing Environment: Variability MUST be eliminated Services Environment: All variability CANNOT be eliminated Customers measure quality of service by how their variability is accommodated Impossible since customers are an input Reality: Customers introduce variability but complain about inconsistency

Upload: laasya

Post on 21-Feb-2016

18 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Breaking the Trade-Off Between Efficiency and Service. Manufacturing Environment: Variability MUST be eliminated Services Environment: All variability CANNOT be eliminated Customers measure quality of service by how their variability is accommodated Impossible since customers are an input - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

1

Breaking the Trade-Off Between Efficiency and Service

• Manufacturing Environment: Variability MUST be eliminated

• Services Environment: All variability CANNOT be eliminated– Customers measure quality of service by how

their variability is accommodated– Impossible since customers are an input

• Reality: Customers introduce variability but complain about inconsistency

Page 2: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

2

Five Types of Customer Induced Variability

1. Arrival Variability• Customers request service at different

times• Do not always want service when

convenient for company

2. Request Variability• Represented by

substitutions/customizations

Page 3: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

3

Five Types of Variability (Cont’d)

3. Capability Variability• Extent of customer knowledge, skill, etc.

4. Effort Variability• Degree of customer willingness

5. Subjective Preference Variability• Customers have different opinions or

preferences as to how they evaluate service

Page 4: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

4

Reduction Strategy• Classic reduction strategy: the restaurant menu

– By their nature are a way to constrain variability– For customers to order “off menu” is part of a premier

dining experience– When the restaurant does not accommodate special

orders:• They reduce the complexity of the operating environment• May diminish service quality

• Companies that use the reduction strategy tend to attract customers, who are willing to trade-off an excellent service experience for low prices

Page 5: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

5

Uncompromised Reduction• Companies can reduce the impact of variability

by targeting customers on the basis of variability type

• e.g., colleges choose students whose test scores fall within a narrow band, therefore the school does not have to support more than one curriculum

• Companies can benefit from reduced variability without requiring customers to adjust

Page 6: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

6

Accommodation Strategies• Involves experienced employees to compensate

for the variations among customers• Employees are making adaptations to “protect”

the customer from making their own adjustments• Costs more and force the company to bear the

brunt of the variability• Only high-end companies can command such a

premium• Success of the strategy hinges on the

company’s ability to persuade customers to pay more to cover the added expenses

Page 7: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

7

Low-Cost Accommodation• Companies are persuading customers to

serve themselves• The service experience varies with

customers’ capability and effort• Effective for high arrivals or request

variability• Customers need to feel compensated in

some way: low prices, greater customization

Page 8: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

8

Matrix of Classic Trade-Off• Managing customer –

introduced variability does not have to come down to a stark trade-off between cost and quality

• Other options exist – those above the diagonal which let companies offer a high level of accommodation at low cost or reduced variability without damaging the service experience

Page 9: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

9

Solutions in Practice

• Arrival and Request Variability– Dell

• New products would demand responsive service• Options: reduce variability or accommodate variability• Solution:

– Third Party Service– Risk– Successful

Strategy: low cost accommodation

Page 10: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

10

Solutions in Practice (Cont’d)• Capability Variability

– Starbucks• Customers have many options• Solution:

– Teach customers proper way to order– Successful

Strategy: uncompromised reduction• Effort Variability

• Instrumental Means– Zipcar, daycare center, video rentals

• Normative Means– Ebay

Strategy: Changing customers’ behavior

Page 11: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

11

Solutions in Practice (Cont’d)

• Subjective Preference Variability– Tiffany & Company

• Crowded stores• Solution:

– Beepers– Not successful

– Southwest Airlines• Chaotic boarding process• Solution:

– Experimental assigning seats– Not successful

Page 12: Breaking the Trade-Off  Between Efficiency and Service

12

Steps in Managing Customer Behavior

• Diagnose the problem– Must understand the roof cause of the

problem• Design a mutually beneficial operating role

for customers• Test and Improve on the solution