bridge design manual m 23-50 chapter 4 seismic design · pdf filewsdot bridge design manual m...
TRANSCRIPT
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-i June 2017
4.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-1
4.2 WSDOTAdditionsandModificationstoAASHTOGuide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (SEISMIC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-24.2.1 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-24.2.2 EarthquakeResistingSystems(ERS)RequirementsforSeismicDesignCatagories
(SDCs)CandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-24.2.3 SeismicGroundShakingHazard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-74.2.4 SelectionofSeismicDesignCategory(SDC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-94.2.5 TemporaryandStagedConstruction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-94.2.6 LoadandResistanceFactors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-94.2.7 BalancedStiffnessRequirementsandBalancedFrameGeometryRecommendation . 4-104.2.8 SelectionofAnalysisProceduretoDetermineSeismicDemand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-104.2.9 MemberDuctilityRequirementforSDCsCandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-104.2.10 LongitudinalRestrainers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-104.2.11 Abutments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-104.2.12 Foundation–General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-154.2.13 Foundation–SpreadFooting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-154.2.14 Procedure3:NonlinearTimeHistoryMethod . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-154.2.15 IeffforBoxGirderSuperstructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-154.2.16 FoundationRocking . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-154.2.17 DrilledShafts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-164.2.18 LongitudinalDirectionRequirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-164.2.19 LiquefactionDesignRequirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-164.2.20 ReinforcingSteel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-164.2.21 ConcreteModeling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-174.2.22 ExpectedNominalMomentCapacity . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-174.2.23 InterlockingBarSize . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-174.2.24 SplicingofLongitudinalReinforcementinColumnsSubjecttoDuctilityDemands
forSDCsCandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-174.2.25 DevelopmentLengthforColumnBarsExtendedintoOversizedPileShaftsf
orSDCsCandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-174.2.26 LateralConfinementforOversizedPileShaftforSDCsCandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-184.2.27 LateralConfinementforNon-OversizedStrengthenedPileShaftforSDCsCandD . . . .4-184.2.28 RequirementsforCapacityProtectedMembers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-184.2.29 SuperstructureCapacityDesignforTransverseDirection(IntegralBentCap)for
SDCsCandD . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-184.2.30 SuperstructureDesignforNonIntegralBentCapsforSDCsB,C,andD . . . . . . . . . . .4-194.2.31 JointProportioning . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-194.2.32 Cast-in-PlaceandPrecastConcretePiles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-19
4.3 SeismicDesignRequirementsforBridgeModificationsandWideningProjects . . . .4-204.3.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-204.3.2 BridgeWideningProjectClassification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-204.3.3 SeismicDesignGuidance: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-214.3.4 ScopingforBridgeWideningandLiquefactionMitigation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-244.3.5 DesignandDetailingConsiderations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-24
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit Contents
Contents
Page 4-ii WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.4 SeismicRetrofittingofExistingBridges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-264.4.1 SeismicAnalysisRequirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-264.4.2 SeismicRetrofitDesign . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-264.4.3 ComputerAnalysisVerification . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-274.4.4 EarthquakeRestrainers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-274.4.5 IsolationBearings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-27
4.5 SeismicDesignRequirementsforRetainingWalls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-284.5.1 General . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-28
4.6 Appendices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4-29Appendix4-B1 DesignExamplesofSeismicRetrofits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-30Appendix4-B2 SAP2000SeismicAnalysisExample . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-35
4.99 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4-118
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-1 June 2017
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
4.1 GeneralSeismicdesignofnewbridgesandbridgewideningsshallconformtoAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (SEISMIC)asmodifiedbySections4.2and4.3.AnalysisanddesignofseismicretrofitsforexistingbridgesshallbecompletedinaccordancewithSection4.4.SeismicdesignofretainingwallsshallbeinaccordancewithSection4.5.Fornonconventionalbridges,bridgesthataredeemedcriticaloressential,orbridgesthatfalloutsidethescopeoftheGuideSpecificationsforanyotherreasons,projectspecificdesignrequirementsshallbedevelopedandsubmittedtotheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineerforapproval.
TheimportanceclassificationsforallhighwaybridgesinWashingtonStateareclassifiedas“Normal”exceptforspecialmajorbridges.Specialmajorbridgesfittingtheclassificationsofeither“Critical”or“Essential”willbesodesignatedbyeithertheWSDOTBridgeandStructuresEngineerortheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
Theperformanceobjectivefor“normal”bridgesislifesafety.BridgesdesignedinaccordancewithAASHTOGuideSpecificationsareintendedtoachievethelifesafetyperformancegoals.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-2 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.2 WSDOTAdditionsandModificationstoAASHTOGuide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (SEISMIC)
WSDOTamendmentstotheAASHTOSEISMICareasfollows:
4.2.1 DefinitionsGuide Specifications Article 2.1 – Addthefollowingdefinitions:• Oversized Pile Shaft – Adrilledshaftfoundationthatislargerindiameterthanthesupportedcolumnandhasareinforcingcagelargerthanandindependentofthecolumns.ThesizeoftheshaftshallbeinaccordancewithSection7.8.2.
• Owner – Personoragencyhavingjurisdictionoverthebridge.ForWSDOTprojects,regardlessofdeliverymethod,theterm“Owner”intheseGuideSpecificationsshallbetheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineeror/andtheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer.
4.2.2 Earthquake Resisting Systems (ERS) Requirements for Seismic Design Catagories (SDCs) C and D
Guide Specifications Article 3.3 – WSDOTGlobalSeismicDesignStrategies:• Type 1 – DuctileSubstructurewithEssentiallyElasticSuperstructure.Thiscategoryispermissible.
• Type 2 – EssentiallyElasticSubstructurewithaDuctileSuperstructure.Thiscategoryisnotpermissible.
• Type 3 – ElasticSuperstructureandSubstructurewithaFusingMechanismBetweentheTwo.ThiscategoryispermissiblewithWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapproval.
WiththeapprovaloftheBridgeDesignEngineer,forType1ERSforSDCCorD,ifcolumnsorpierwallsareconsideredanintegralpartoftheenergydissipatingsystembutremainelasticatthedemanddisplacement,theforcestouseforcapacitydesignofothercomponentsaretobeaminimumof1.2timestheelasticforcesresulting
fromthedemanddisplacementinlieuoftheforcesobtainedfromoverstrengthplastichinginganalysis.Becausemaximumlimitinginertialforcesprovidedbyyieldingelementsactingataplasticmechanismlevelisnoteffectiveinthecaseofelasticdesign,thefollowingconstraintsareimposed.ThesemayberelaxedonacasebycasebasiswiththeapprovaloftheBridgeDesignEngineer.
1. Unlessananalysisthatconsidersredistributionofinternalstructureforcesduetoinelasticactionisperformed,allsubstructureunitsoftheframeunderconsiderationandofanyadjacentframesthatmaytransferinertialforcestotheframeinquestionmustremainelasticatthedesigngroundmotiondemand.
2. Effectivemembersectionpropertiesmustbeconsistentwiththeforcelevelsexpectedwithinthebridgesystem.Reinforcedconcretecolumnsandpierwallsshouldbeanalyzedusingcrackedsectionproperties.Forthispurpose,inabsenceofbetterinformationorestimatedbyFigure5.6.2-1,amomentofinertiaequaltoonehalfthatoftheun-crackedsectionshallbeused.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-3 June 2017
3. Foundationmodelingmustbeestablishedsuchthatuncertaintiesinmodelingwillnotcausetheinternalforcesofanyelementsunderconsiderationtoincreasebymorethan10percent.
4. Whensitespecificgroundresponseanalysisisperformed,theresponsespectrumordinatesmustbeselectedsuchthatuncertaintieswillnotcausetheinternalforcesofanyelementsunderconsiderationtoincreasebymorethan10percent.
5. Thermal,shrinkage,prestressorotherforcesthatmaybepresentinthestructureatthetimeofanearthquakemustbeconsideredtoactinasensethatisleastfavorabletotheseismicloadcombinationunderinvestigation.
6. P-Deltaeffectsmustbeassessedusingtheresistanceoftheframeinquestionatthedeflectioncausedbythedesigngroundmotion.
7. Jointsheareffectsmustbeassessedwithaminimumofthecalculatedelasticinternalforcesappliedtothejoint.
8. DetailingasnormallyrequiredineitherSDCCorD,asappropriate,mustbeprovided.
Itispermittedtouseexpectedmaterialstrengthsforthedeterminationofmemberstrengthsforelasticresponseofmembers.
TheuseofelasticdesigninlieuofoverstrengthplastichingingforcesforcapacityprotectiondescribedaboveshallonlybeconsideredifdesignerdemonstratesthatcapacitydesignofArticle4.11oftheAASHTOGuide Specifications for LRFD Bridge Seismic Designisnotfeasibleduetogeotechnicalorstructuralreasons.
Type3ERSmaybeconsideredonlyifType1strategyisnotsuitableandType3strategyhasbeendeemednecessaryforaccommodatingseismicloads.UseofisolationbearingsneedstheapprovalofWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.IsolationbearingsshallbedesignedpertherequirementspecifiedinSection9.3
Ifthecolumnsorpierwallsaredesignedforelasticforces,allotherelementsshallbedesignedforthelesseroftheforcesresultingfromtheoverstrengthplastichingingmomentcapacityofcolumnsorpierwallsandtheunreducedelasticseismicforceinallSDCs.Theminimumdetailingaccordingtothebridgeseismicdesigncategoryshallbeprovided.Sheardesignshallbebasedon1.2timeselasticshearforceandnominalmaterialstrengthsshallbeusedforcapacities.LimitationsontheuseofERSandEREareshowninFigures3.3-1a,3.3-1b,3.3-2,and3.3-3.• Figure3.3-1bType6,connectionwithmomentreducingdetailshouldonlybeusedatcolumnbaseifprovednecessaryforfoundationdesign.FixedconnectionatbaseofcolumnremainsthepreferredoptionforWSDOTbridges.
• Thedesigncriteriaforcolumnbasewithmomentreducingdetailshallconsiderallapplicableloadsatservice,strength,andextremeeventlimitstates.
• Figure3.3-2Types6and8arenotpermissiblefornon-liquefiedconfigurationandpermissiblewithWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapprovalforliquefiedconfiguration
ForERSsandEREsrequiringapproval,theWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapprovalisrequiredregardlessofcontractingmethod(i.e.,approvalauthorityisnottransferredtootherentities).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-4 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
Figure 3.3-1a Permissible Earthquake-Resisting Systems (ERSs).
Longitudinal ResponseUponApproval
PermissibleUponApproval
1
LongitudinalResponse
Permissible
Plastichingesininspectablelocationsorelasticdesignofcolumns.
AbutmentresistancenotrequiredaspartofERS
Knock-offbackwallspermissible
Transverse Response
2
LongitudinalResponse
Isolationbearingsaccommodatefulldisplacement
AbutmentnotrequiredaspartofERS
3Permissible
Plastichingesininspectablelocations.
AbutmentnotrequiredinERS,breakawayshearkeyspermissiblewithWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sApproval
4
TransverseorLongitudinalResponse
Plastichingesininspectablelocations
Isolationbearingswithorwithoutenergydissipaterstolimitoveralldisplacements
PermissibleUponApproval
5
Transverse or LongitudinalResponse
Permissible
Abutmentrequiredtoresistthedesignearthquakeelastically
Longitudinalpassivesoilpressureshallbelessthan0.70ofthevalueobtainedusingtheproceduregiveninBDMArticle4.2.11
6LongitudinalResponse
Multiplesimply-supportedspanswithadequatesupportlengths
Plastichingesininspectablelocationsorelasticdesignofcolumns
NotPermissible
Figure3.3-1aPermissibleEarthquake-ResistingSystems(ERSs)BDM Figure 4.2.2-1
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-5 June 2017
Figure 3.3-1 b Permissible Earthquake-Resisting Elements (EREs)
Columnswitharchitecturalflares–withorwithoutanisolationgap
SeeArticle8.14
Seatabutmentswhosebackwallisdesignedtoresisttheexpectedimpactforceinanessentiallyelasticmanner
3
Pierwallswithorwithoutpiles.
SpreadfootingsthatsatisfytheoverturningcriteriaofArticle6.3.4
Capacity-protectedpilecaps,includingcapswithbatteredpiles,whichbehaveelastically
Pileswith‘pinned-head’conditions
Seismicisolationbearingsorbearingsdesignedtoaccommodateexpectedseismicdisplacementswithnodamage
Plastichingesbelowcapbeamsincludingpilebents
Aboveground/neargroundplastichinges
Tensileyieldingandinelasticcompressionbucklingofductileconcentricallybracedframes
Plastichingesatbaseofwallpiersinweakdirection
Seatabutmentswhosebackwallisdesignedtofuse
PassiveabutmentresistancerequiredaspartofERSUse70%ofpassivesoilstrengthdesignatedinBDMArticle4.2.11
isolationgapoptional
1
2
4
56
7 8
9
10
11
12
13
Permissible
PermissibleUponApproval
Permissible
NotPermissible
PermissibleUponApproval
Permissible
Permissible
PermissibleUponApproval
Permissibleexceptbatteredpilesarenotallowed
Permissible
Permissible
Permissible–isolationgapisrequired
14
Permissible
Columnswithmomentreducingorpinnedhingedetails
Permissible
Figure3.3-1bPermissibleEarthquake-ResistingElements(EREs)BDM Figure 4.2.2-2
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-6 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
Figure 3.3-2 Permissible Earthquake-Resisting Elements that Require Owner’s Approval
1 Passive abutment resistance required as part of ERS Passive StrengthUse 100% of strength designated in Article 5 .2 .3
2
3Ductile End-diaphragms in superstructure (Article 7 .4 .6) 4
Sliding of spread footing abutment allowed to limit force transferred
Limit movement to adjacent bent displacement capacity
Foundations permitted to rock
Use rocking criteria according to Appendix A
5
More than the outer line of piles in group systems allowed to plunge or uplift under seismic loadings
6Wall piers on pile foundations that are not strong enough to force plastic hinging into the wall, and are not designed for the Design Earthquake elastic forces
Ensure Limited Ductility Response in Piles according to Article 4 .7 .1
7Plumb piles that are not capacity-protected (e .g ., integral abutment piles or pile-supported seat abutments that are not fused transversely)
Ensure Limited Ductility Response in Piles according to Article 4 .7 .1
8In-ground hinging in shafts or piles .
Ensure Limited Ductility Response in Piles according to Article 4 .7 .1
9
Batter pile systems in which the geotechnical capacities and/or in-ground hinging define the plastic mechanisms .
Ensure Limited Ductility Response in Piles according to Article 4 .7 .1
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
PermissibleUponApprovalforLiquefiedConfiguration
PermissibleUponApprovalforLiquefiedConfiguration
Figure3.3-2PermissibleEarthquake-ResistingElementsThatRequireOwner’sApprovalBDM Figure 4.2.2-3
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-7 June 2017
Figure 3.3-3 Earthquake-Resisting Elements that Are Not Recommended for New Bridges
NotPermissible
Bearing systems that do not provide for the expected displacements and/or forces (e .g ., rocker bearings)
Battered-pile systems that are not designed to fuse geotechnically or structurally by elements with adequate ductility capacity
Cap beam plastic hinging (particularly hinging that leads to vertical girder movement) also includes eccentric braced frames with girders supported by cap beams
Plastic hinges in superstructure
12
3 4
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
NotPermissible
Figure3.3-3Earthquake-ResistingElementsthatAreNotRecommendedforNewBridgesBDM Figure 4.2.2-4
4.2.3 Seismic Ground Shaking HazardGuide Specifications Article 3.4–ForbridgesthatareconsideredcriticaloressentialornormalbridgeswithasiteClassF,theseismicgroundshakinghazardshallbedeterminedbasedontheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineerrecommendations.
IncaseswherethesitecoefficientsusedtoadjustmappedvaluesofdesigngroundmotionforlocalconditionsareinappropriatetodeterminethedesignspectrainaccordancewithgeneralprocedureofArticle3.4.1(suchastheperiodattheendofconstantdesignspectralaccelerationplateau(Ts)isgreaterthan1.0secondortheperiodatthebeginningofconstantdesignspectralaccelerationplateau(To)islessthan0.2second),asite-specificgroundmotionresponseanalysisshallbeperformed.
Inthegeneralprocedure,thespectralresponseparametersshallbedeterminedusingtheUSGS2014SeismicHazardMapswithSevenPercentProbabilityofExceedancein75yr(1000-yrReturnPeriod).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-8 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
GuideSpecificationsArticle3.4.2.3-SiteCoefficientsThesitecoefficientsforpeakgroundacceleration,Fpga,short-periodrangeFa,andforlong-periodrangeFvshallbetakenasspecifiedinthefollowingTables:
Site ClassMappedPeakGroundAccelerationCoefficient(PGA)
PGA≤0.10 PGA=0.2 PGA=0.3 PGA=0.4 PGA=0.5 PGA≥0.6A 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8B 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9C 1 .3 1 .2 1 .2 1 .2 1 .2 1 .2D 1 .6 1 .4 1 .3 1 .2 1 .1 1 .1E 2 .4 1 .9 1 .6 1 .4 1 .2 1 .1F * * * * * *
ValuesofSiteCoefficient,Fpga,forPeakGroundAccelerationTable 3.4.2.3-1A
Site ClassMappedSpectralAccelerationCoefficientatPeriod0.2sec(Ss)
Ss≤0.25 Ss=0.50 Ss=0.75 Ss=1.00 Ss=1.25 Ss≥1.50A 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8B 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9 0 .9C 1 .3 1 .3 1 .2 1 .2 1 .2 1 .2D 1 .6 1 .4 1 .2 1 .1 1 .0 1 .0E 2 .4 1 .7 1 .3 * * *F * * * * * *
ValuesofSiteCoefficient,Fa,for0.2-secPeriodSpectralAccelerationTable 3.4.2.3-1B
Site ClassMappedSpectralAccelerationCoefficientatPeriod1.0sec(S1)
S1≤0.1 S1=0.2 S1=0.3 S1=0.4 S1=0.5 S1≥0.6A 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8B 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8 0 .8C 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .5 1 .4D 2 .4 2 .2 2 .0 1 .9 1 .8 1 .7E 4 .2 3 .3 2 .8 2 .4 2 .2 2 .0F * * * * * *
*Site-specific response geotechnical investigation and dynamic site response analysis should be considered .Note: Use straight line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA, Ss, and S1 .
ValuesofSiteCoefficient,Fv,for1.0-secPeriodSpectralAccelerationTable 3.4.2.3.2
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-9 June 2017
GroundMotionToolThegroundmotionsoftwaretoolcalledSpectradevelopedbytheBridgeandStructuresOfficeallowstheusertogeneratethedesignresponsespectrumusingtheUSGS2014SeismichazardmapsandtheupdatedSiteCoefficients.SpectraisatoolintheBridgeLinkBEToolboxapplication.DownloadBridgeLinkfromtheWSDOTwebsiteatwww.wsdot.wa.gov/eesc/bridge/software.
Afterdownloadingandinstalling,startBridgeLink,selectFile>NewandselecttheSpectratooltobeginanewresponsespectrumproject.
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.16June 2016
Page 4-9
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
4.2.4 Selection of Seismic Design Category (SDC)
Guide Specifications Article 3.5 – PushoveranalysisshallbeusedtodeterminedisplacementcapacityforbothSDCsCandD.
4.2.5 Temporary and Staged Construction
Guide Specifications Article 3.6 – Forbridgesthataredesignedforareducedseismicdemand,thecontractplansshalleitherincludeastatementthatclearlyindicatesthatthebridgewasdesignedastemporaryusingareducedseismicdemandorshowtheAccelerationResponseSpectrum(ARS)usedfordesign.
4.2.4 Selection of Seismic Design Category (SDC)Guide Specifications Article 3.5–PushoveranalysisshallbeusedtodeterminedisplacementcapacityforbothSDCsCandD.
4.2.5 Temporary and Staged ConstructionGuide Specifications Article 3.6–Forbridgesthataredesignedforareducedseismicdemand,thecontractplansshalleitherincludeastatementthatclearlyindicatesthatthebridgewasdesignedastemporaryusingareducedseismicdemandorshowtheAccelerationResponseSpectrum(ARS)usedfordesign.Noliquefactionassessmentrequiredfortemporarybridges.
4.2.6 Load and Resistance FactorsGuide Specifications Article 3.7–Reviseasfollows:
Useloadfactorsof1.0forallpermanentloads.Theloadfactorforliveloadshallbe0.0whenpushoveranalysisisusedtodeterminethedisplacementcapacity.Useliveloadfactorof0.5forallotherextremeeventcases.Unlessotherwisenoted,allϕfactorsshallbetakenas1.0.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-10 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.2.7 Balanced Stiffness Requirements and Balanced Frame Geometry Recommendation
Guide Specifications Articles 4.1.2 and 4.1.3–BalancedstiffnessbetweenbentswithinaframeandbetweencolumnswithinabentandbalancedframegeometryforadjacentframesarerequiredforbridgesinbothSDCsCandD.DeviationsfrombalancedstiffnessandbalancedframegeometryrequirementsrequireapprovalfromtheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
4.2.8 Selection of Analysis Procedure to Determine Seismic DemandGuide Specifications Article 4.2–AnalysisProcedures:• Procedure1(EquivalentStaticAnalysis)shallnotbeused.• Procedure2(ElasticDynamicAnalysis)shallbeusedforall“regular”bridgeswithtwothroughsixspansand“notregular”bridgeswithtwoormorespansinSDCsB,C,orD.
• Procedure3(NonlinearTimeHistory)shallonlybeusedwithWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapproval.
4.2.9 Member Ductility Requirement for SDCs C and DGuide Specifications Article 4.9–In-groundhingingfordrilledshaftandpilefoundationsmaybeconsideredfortheliquefiedconfigurationwithWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineerapproval.
4.2.10 Longitudinal RestrainersGuide Specifications Article 4.13.1 – Longitudinalrestrainersshallbeprovidedattheexpansionjointsbetweensuperstructuresegments.RestrainersshallbedesignedinaccordancewiththeFHWASeismicRetrofittingManualforHighwayStructure(FHWA-HRT-06-032)Article8.4TheIterativeMethod.SeetheearthquakerestrainerdesignexampleintheAppendixofthischapter.RestrainersshallbedetailedinaccordancewiththerequirementsofGuideSpecificationsArticle4.13.3andSection4.4.5.RestrainersmaybeomittedforSDCsCandDwheretheavailableseatwidthexceedsthecalculatedsupportlengthspecifiedinEquationC4.13.1-1.
OmittingrestrainersforliquefiablesitesshallbeapprovedbytheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
Longitudinalrestrainersshallnotbeusedattheendpiers(abutments).
4.2.11 AbutmentsGuide Specifications Article 5.2–DiaphragmAbutmenttypeshowninFigure5.2.3.2-1shallnotbeusedforWSDOTbridges.
Guide Specifications Article 5.2–Abutmentstoberevisedasfollows:
5.2.1 - General
Theparticipationofabutmentwallsinprovidingresistancetoseismicallyinducedinertialloadsmaybeconsideredintheseismicdesignofbridgeseithertoreducecolumnsizesorreducetheductilitydemandonthecolumns.Damagetobackwallsandwingwallsduringearthquakesmaybeconsideredacceptablewhenconsideringno
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-11 June 2017
collapsecriteria,providedthatunseatingorotherdamagetothesuperstructuredoesnotoccur.Abutmentparticipationintheoveralldynamicresponseofthebridgesystemshallreflectthestructuralconfiguration,theloadtransfermechanismfromthebridgetotheabutmentsystem,theeffectivestiffnessandforcecapacityofthewall-soilsystem,andthelevelofacceptableabutmentdamage.Thecapacityoftheabutmentstoresistthebridgeinertialloadsshallbecompatiblewiththesoilresistancethatcanbereliablymobilized,thestructuraldesignoftheabutmentwall,andwhetherthewallispermittedtobedamagedbythedesignearthquake.Thelateralloadcapacityofwallsshallbeevaluatedonthebasisofarationalpassiveearth-pressuretheory.
TheparticipationofthebridgeapproachslabintheoveralldynamicresponseofbridgesystemstoearthquakeloadingandinprovidingresistancetoseismicallyinducedinertialloadsmaybeconsideredpermissibleuponapprovalfromboththeWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineerandtheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer.
TheparticipationoftheabutmentintheERSshouldbecarefullyevaluatedwiththeGeotechnicalEngineerandtheOwnerwhenthepresenceoftheabutmentbackfillmaybeuncertain,asinthecaseofslumpingorsettlementduetoliquefactionbeloworneartheabutment.
5.2.2 - Longitudinal Direction
Underearthquakeloading,theearthpressureactiononabutmentwallschangesfromastaticconditiontooneoftwopossibleconditions:• Thedynamicactivepressureconditionasthewallmovesawayfromthebackfill,or• Thepassivepressureconditionastheinertialloadofthebridgepushesthewallintothebackfill.
Thegoverningearthpressureconditiondependsonthemagnitudeofseismicallyinducedmovementoftheabutmentwalls,thebridgesuperstructure,andthebridge/abutmentconfiguration.
Forsemi-integral(Figure5.2.2-a),L-shapeabutmentwithbackwallfuse
(Figure5.2.2-b),orwithoutbackwallfuse(Figure5.2.2-c),forwhichtheexpansionjointissufficientlylargetoaccommodateboththecyclicmovementbetweentheabutmentwallandthebridgesuperstructure(i.e.,superstructuredoesnotpushagainstabutmentwall),theseismicallyinducedearthpressureontheabutmentwallshallbeconsideredtobethedynamicactivepressurecondition.However,whenthegapattheexpansionjointisnotsufficienttoaccommodatethecyclicwall/bridgeseismicmovements,atransferofforceswilloccurfromthesuperstructuretotheabutmentwall.Asaresult,theactiveearthpressureconditionwillnotbevalidandtheearthpressureapproachesamuchlargerpassivepressureloadconditionbehindthebackwall.Thislargerloadconditionisthemaincauseforabutmentdamage,asdemonstratedinpastearthquakes.Forsemi-integralorL-shapeabutments,theabutmentstiffnessandcapacityunderpassivepressureloadingareprimarydesignconcerns.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-12 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
Longitudinalrestrainersshallnotbeusedattheendpiers(abutments).
4.2.11 Abutments
(a)Semi-integralAbutment (b)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallFuses
(c)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallDoesNotFuse
Figure5.2.2- AbutmentStiffnessandPassivePressure EstimateBDM Figure 4.2.11-1
Wherethepassivepressureresistanceofsoilsbehindsemi-integralorL-shapeabut-mentswillbemobilizedthroughlargelongitudinalsuperstructuredisplacements,thebridgemaybedesignedwiththeabutmentsaskeyelementsofthelongitudinalERS.Abutmentsshallbedesignedtosustainthedesignearthquakedisplacements.Whenabutmentstiffnessandcapacityareincludedinthedesign,itshouldberecognizedthatthepassivepressurezonemobilizedbyabutmentdisplacementextendsbeyondtheactivepressurezonenormallyusedforstaticserviceloaddesign.Thisisillustrat-edschematicallyinFigures1aand1b. Dynamicactiveearthpressureactingontheabutmentneednotbeconsideredinthedynamicanalysisofthebridge. Thepassiveabutmentresistanceshallbelimitedto70%ofthevalueobtainedusingtheproceduregiveninArticle5.2.2.1.
5.2.2.1 - Abutment Stiffness and Passive Pressure Estimate
Abutmentstiffness,Keff inkip/ft,andpassivecapacity,Pp inkips,shouldbecharac-terizedbyabilinearorotherhigherordernonlinearrelationshipasshowninFigure5.2.2.1.Whenthemotionofthebackwallisprimarilytranslation,passivepressuresmaybeassumeduniformlydistributedovertheheight(Hw)ofthebackwallorenddiaphragm.Thetotalpassiveforcemaybedeterminedas:
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5.2.2.1-1)
where:
Longitudinalrestrainersshallnotbeusedattheendpiers(abutments).
4.2.11 Abutments
(a)Semi-integralAbutment (b)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallFuses
(c)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallDoesNotFuse
Figure5.2.2- AbutmentStiffnessandPassivePressure EstimateBDM Figure 4.2.11-1
Wherethepassivepressureresistanceofsoilsbehindsemi-integralorL-shapeabut-mentswillbemobilizedthroughlargelongitudinalsuperstructuredisplacements,thebridgemaybedesignedwiththeabutmentsaskeyelementsofthelongitudinalERS.Abutmentsshallbedesignedtosustainthedesignearthquakedisplacements.Whenabutmentstiffnessandcapacityareincludedinthedesign,itshouldberecognizedthatthepassivepressurezonemobilizedbyabutmentdisplacementextendsbeyondtheactivepressurezonenormallyusedforstaticserviceloaddesign.Thisisillustrat-edschematicallyinFigures1aand1b. Dynamicactiveearthpressureactingontheabutmentneednotbeconsideredinthedynamicanalysisofthebridge. Thepassiveabutmentresistanceshallbelimitedto70%ofthevalueobtainedusingtheproceduregiveninArticle5.2.2.1.
5.2.2.1 - Abutment Stiffness and Passive Pressure Estimate
Abutmentstiffness,Keff inkip/ft,andpassivecapacity,Pp inkips,shouldbecharac-terizedbyabilinearorotherhigherordernonlinearrelationshipasshowninFigure5.2.2.1.Whenthemotionofthebackwallisprimarilytranslation,passivepressuresmaybeassumeduniformlydistributedovertheheight(Hw)ofthebackwallorenddiaphragm.Thetotalpassiveforcemaybedeterminedas:
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5.2.2.1-1)
where:
Longitudinalrestrainersshallnotbeusedattheendpiers(abutments).
4.2.11 Abutments
(a)Semi-integralAbutment (b)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallFuses
(c)L-shapeAbutmentBackwallDoesNotFuse
Figure5.2.2- AbutmentStiffnessandPassivePressure EstimateBDM Figure 4.2.11-1
Wherethepassivepressureresistanceofsoilsbehindsemi-integralorL-shapeabut-mentswillbemobilizedthroughlargelongitudinalsuperstructuredisplacements,thebridgemaybedesignedwiththeabutmentsaskeyelementsofthelongitudinalERS.Abutmentsshallbedesignedtosustainthedesignearthquakedisplacements.Whenabutmentstiffnessandcapacityareincludedinthedesign,itshouldberecognizedthatthepassivepressurezonemobilizedbyabutmentdisplacementextendsbeyondtheactivepressurezonenormallyusedforstaticserviceloaddesign.Thisisillustrat-edschematicallyinFigures1aand1b. Dynamicactiveearthpressureactingontheabutmentneednotbeconsideredinthedynamicanalysisofthebridge. Thepassiveabutmentresistanceshallbelimitedto70%ofthevalueobtainedusingtheproceduregiveninArticle5.2.2.1.
5.2.2.1 - Abutment Stiffness and Passive Pressure Estimate
Abutmentstiffness,Keff inkip/ft,andpassivecapacity,Pp inkips,shouldbecharac-terizedbyabilinearorotherhigherordernonlinearrelationshipasshowninFigure5.2.2.1.Whenthemotionofthebackwallisprimarilytranslation,passivepressuresmaybeassumeduniformlydistributedovertheheight(Hw)ofthebackwallorenddiaphragm.Thetotalpassiveforcemaybedeterminedas:
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5.2.2.1-1)
where:
(a) Semi-integral Abutment (b) L-shape Abutment Backwall Fuses
(c) L-shape Abutment Backwall Does Not Fuse
Figure5.2.2-AbutmentStiffnessandPassivePressureEstimateFigure 4.2.11-1
Wherethepassivepressureresistanceofsoilsbehindsemi-integralorL-shapeabutmentswillbemobilizedthroughlargelongitudinalsuperstructuredisplacements,thebridgemaybedesignedwiththeabutmentsaskeyelementsofthelongitudinalERS.Abutmentsshallbedesignedtosustainthedesignearthquakedisplacements.Whenabutmentstiffnessandcapacityareincludedinthedesign,itshouldberecognizedthatthepassivepressurezonemobilizedbyabutmentdisplacementextendsbeyondtheactivepressurezonenormallyusedforstaticserviceloaddesign.ThisisillustratedschematicallyinFigures4.2.11-1aand4.2.11-1b.Dynamicactiveearthpressureactingontheabutmentneednotbeconsideredinthedynamicanalysisofthebridge.Thepassiveabutmentresistanceshallbelimitedto70percentofthevalueobtainedusingtheproceduregiveninArticle5.2.2.1.
5.2.2.1 - Abutment Stiffness and Passive Pressure Estimate
Abutmentstiffness,Keffinkip/ft,andpassivecapacity,Ppinkips,shouldbecharacterizedbyabilinearorotherhigherordernonlinearrelationshipasshowninFigure5.2.2.1.Whenthemotionofthebackwallisprimarilytranslation,passivepressuresmaybeassumeduniformlydistributedovertheheight(Hw)ofthebackwallorenddiaphragm.Thetotalpassiveforcemaybedeterminedas:
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5 .2 .2 .1-1)
Where: pp = passive lateral earth pressure behind backwall or diaphragm (ksf) Hw = height of back wall or end diaphragm exposed to passive earth pressure (feet) Ww = width of back wall or diaphragm (feet)
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5.2.2.1-1)
where:
pp =passivelateralearthpressurebehindbackwallordiaphragm(ksf)
Hw =heightofbackwallorenddiaphragmexposedtopassiveearthpressure(ft)
Ww =widthofbackwallordiaphragm(ft)
(a) Semi-integralAbutment (b): L-shapeAbutment
Figure5.2.2.1- CharacterizationofAbutmentCapacityandStiffnessBDM Figure 4.2.11-2
5.2.2.2- Calculation of Best Estimate Passive Pressure Pp
Ifthestrengthcharacteristicsofcompactedornaturalsoilsinthe"passivepressurezone"areknown,thenthepassiveforceforagivenheight,Hw, maybecalculatedus-ingacceptedanalysisprocedures.Theseproceduresshouldaccountfortheinterfacefrictionbetweenthewallandthesoil.Thepropertiesusedshallbethoseindicativeoftheentire"passivepressurezone"asindicatedinFigure1. Therefore,thepropertiesofbackfillpresentimmediatelyadjacenttothewallintheactivepressurezone maynotbeappropriateasaweakerfailuresurfacecandevelopelsewhereintheembank-ment.
ForL-shapeabutmentswherethebackwallisnotdesignedtofuse,Hw
shallconservativelybetakenasthedepthofthesuperstructure,unlessamorerationalsoil-structureinteractionanalysisisperformed.
Ifpresumptivepassivepressuresaretobeusedfordesign,thenthefollowingcriteriashallapply:
Pp = pp Hw Ww (5.2.2.1-1)
where:
pp =passivelateralearthpressurebehindbackwallordiaphragm(ksf)
Hw =heightofbackwallorenddiaphragmexposedtopassiveearthpressure(ft)
Ww =widthofbackwallordiaphragm(ft)
(a) Semi-integralAbutment (b): L-shapeAbutment
Figure5.2.2.1- CharacterizationofAbutmentCapacityandStiffnessBDM Figure 4.2.11-2
5.2.2.2- Calculation of Best Estimate Passive Pressure Pp
Ifthestrengthcharacteristicsofcompactedornaturalsoilsinthe"passivepressurezone"areknown,thenthepassiveforceforagivenheight,Hw, maybecalculatedus-ingacceptedanalysisprocedures.Theseproceduresshouldaccountfortheinterfacefrictionbetweenthewallandthesoil.Thepropertiesusedshallbethoseindicativeoftheentire"passivepressurezone"asindicatedinFigure1. Therefore,thepropertiesofbackfillpresentimmediatelyadjacenttothewallintheactivepressurezone maynotbeappropriateasaweakerfailuresurfacecandevelopelsewhereintheembank-ment.
ForL-shapeabutmentswherethebackwallisnotdesignedtofuse,Hw
shallconservativelybetakenasthedepthofthesuperstructure,unlessamorerationalsoil-structureinteractionanalysisisperformed.
Ifpresumptivepassivepressuresaretobeusedfordesign,thenthefollowingcriteriashallapply:
(a) Semi-integral Abutment (b) L-shape AbutmentFigure5.2.2.1-CharacterizationofAbutmentCapacityandStiffness
Figure 4.2.11-2
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-13 June 2017
5.2.2.2 - Calculation of Best Estimate Passive Pressure Pp
Ifthestrengthcharacteristicsofcompactedornaturalsoilsinthe"passivepressurezone"areknown,thenthepassiveforceforagivenheight,Hw,maybecalculatedusingacceptedanalysisprocedures.Theseproceduresshouldaccountfortheinterfacefrictionbetweenthewallandthesoil.Thepropertiesusedshallbethoseindicativeoftheentire"passivepressurezone"asindicatedinFigure1.Therefore,thepropertiesofbackfillpresentimmediatelyadjacenttothewallintheactivepressurezonemaynotbeappropriateasaweakerfailuresurfacecandevelopelsewhereintheembankment.
ForL-shapeabutmentswherethebackwallisnotdesignedtofuse,Hwshallconservativelybetakenasthedepthofthesuperstructure,unlessamorerationalsoil-structureinteractionanalysisisperformed.
Ifpresumptivepassivepressuresaretobeusedfordesign,thenthefollowingcriteriashallapply:• Soilinthe"passivepressurezone"shallbecompactedinaccordancewithStandard
SpecificationsSection2-03.3(14)I,whichrequirescompactionto95percentmaximumdensityforall“BridgeApproachEmbankments”.
• Forcohesionless,nonplasticbackfill(finescontentlessthan30percent),thepassivepressureppmaybeassumedequalto2Hw/3ksfperfootofwalllength.
Forothercases,includingabutmentsconstructedincuts,thepassivepressuresshallbedevelopedbyageotechnicalengineer.
5.2.2.3 - Calculation of Passive Soil Stiffness
Equivalentlinearsecantstiffness,Keffinkip/ft,isrequiredforanalyses.Forsemi-integralorL-shapeabutmentsinitialsecantstiffnessmaybedeterminedasfollows:
5.2.2.3- Calculation of Passive Soil Stiffness
Equivalentlinearsecantstiffness,Keff inkip/ft,isrequiredforanalyses.Forsemi-integralorL-shapeabutmentsinitialsecantstiffnessmaybedeterminedasfol-lows:
( )ww
peff HF
PK =1 (5.2.2.3-1)
where:
Pp =passivelateralearthpressurecapacity(kip)
Hw =heightofbackwall(ft)
Fw = thevalueofFw touseforaparticularbridgemaybefoundinTableC3.11.1-1oftheAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
ForL-shapeabutments,theexpansiongapshouldbeincludedintheinitialestimateofthesecantstiffnessasspecifiedin:
( )gww
peff DHF
PK
+=1 (5.2.2.3-2)
where:
Dg =widthofgapbetweenbackwallandsuperstructure(ft)
ForSDCsCandD,wherepushoveranalysesareconducted,valuesofPp andtheini-tialestimateofKeff1 shouldbeusedtodefineabilinearload-displacementbehavioroftheabutmentforthecapacityassessment.
5.2.2.4-Modeling Passive Pressure Stiffness in the Longitudinal Direction
Inthelongitudinaldirection,whenthebridgeismovingtowardthesoil, thefullpas-siveresistanceofthesoilmaybemobilized,butwhenthebridgemovesawayfromthesoilnosoilresistanceismobilized. Sincepassivepressureactsatonlyoneabutmentatatime,linearelasticdynamicmodelsandframepushovermodelsshouldonlyincludeapassivepressurespringatoneabutmentinanygivenmodel.Secantstiffnessvaluesforpassivepressureshallbedevelopedindependentlyforeachabut-ment.
(5 .2 .2 .3-1)
Where: Pp = passive lateral earth pressure capacity (kip) Hw = height of back wall (feet) Fw = the value of Fw to use for a particular bridge may be found in Table C3 .11 .1-1 of the AASHTO LRFD .
ForL-shapeabutments,theexpansiongapshouldbeincludedintheinitialestimateofthesecantstiffnessasspecifiedin:
5.2.2.3- Calculation of Passive Soil Stiffness
Equivalentlinearsecantstiffness,Keff inkip/ft,isrequiredforanalyses.Forsemi-integralorL-shapeabutmentsinitialsecantstiffnessmaybedeterminedasfol-lows:
( )ww
peff HF
PK =1 (5.2.2.3-1)
where:
Pp =passivelateralearthpressurecapacity(kip)
Hw =heightofbackwall(ft)
Fw = thevalueofFw touseforaparticularbridgemaybefoundinTableC3.11.1-1oftheAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications.
ForL-shapeabutments,theexpansiongapshouldbeincludedintheinitialestimateofthesecantstiffnessasspecifiedin:
( )gww
peff DHF
PK
+=1 (5.2.2.3-2)
where:
Dg =widthofgapbetweenbackwallandsuperstructure(ft)
ForSDCsCandD,wherepushoveranalysesareconducted,valuesofPp andtheini-tialestimateofKeff1 shouldbeusedtodefineabilinearload-displacementbehavioroftheabutmentforthecapacityassessment.
5.2.2.4-Modeling Passive Pressure Stiffness in the Longitudinal Direction
Inthelongitudinaldirection,whenthebridgeismovingtowardthesoil, thefullpas-siveresistanceofthesoilmaybemobilized,butwhenthebridgemovesawayfromthesoilnosoilresistanceismobilized. Sincepassivepressureactsatonlyoneabutmentatatime,linearelasticdynamicmodelsandframepushovermodelsshouldonlyincludeapassivepressurespringatoneabutmentinanygivenmodel.Secantstiffnessvaluesforpassivepressureshallbedevelopedindependentlyforeachabut-ment.
(5 .2 .2 .3-2)
Where: Dg = width of gap between backwall and superstructure (feet)
ForSDCsCandD,wherepushoveranalysesareconducted,valuesofPpandtheinitialestimateofKeff1shouldbeusedtodefineabilinearload-displacementbehavioroftheabutmentforthecapacityassessment.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-14 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
5.2.2.4 - Modeling Passive Pressure Stiffness in the Longitudinal Direction
Inthelongitudinaldirection,whenthebridgeismovingtowardthesoil,thefullpassiveresistanceofthesoilmaybemobilized,butwhenthebridgemovesawayfromthesoilnosoilresistanceismobilized.Sincepassivepressureactsatonlyoneabutmentatatime,linearelasticdynamicmodelsandframepushovermodelsshouldonlyincludeapassivepressurespringatoneabutmentinanygivenmodel.Secantstiffnessvaluesforpassivepressureshallbedevelopedindependentlyforeachabutment.
Asanalternative,forstraightorwithhorizontalcurvesupto30degreessingleframebridges,andcompressionmodelsinstraightmulti-framebridgeswherethe
passivepressurestiffnessissimilarbetweenabutments,aspringmaybeusedateachabutmentconcurrently.Inthiscase,theassignedspringvaluesateachendneedto
bereducedbyhalfbecausetheyactinsimultaneously,whereastheactualbackfillpassiveresistanceactsonlyinonedirectionandatonetime.Correspondingly,theactualpeakpassiveresistanceforceateitherabutmentwillbeequaltothesumofthepeakforcesdevelopedintwosprings.Inthiscase,secantstiffnessvaluesforpassivepressureshallbedevelopedbasedonthesumofpeakforcesdevelopedineachspring.Ifcomputedabutmentforcesexceedthesoilcapacity,thestiffnessshouldbesoftenediterativelyuntilabutmentdisplacementsareconsistent(within30percent)withtheassumedstiffness.
5.2.3 - Transverse Direction
TransversestiffnessofabutmentsmaybeconsideredintheoveralldynamicresponseofbridgesystemsonacasebycasebasisuponBridgeDesignEngineerapproval.
Uponapproval,thetransverseabutmentstiffnessusedintheelasticdemandmodelsmaybetakenas50percentoftheelastictransversestiffnessoftheadjacentbent.
Girderstopsaretypicallydesignedtotransmitthelateralshearforcesgeneratedbysmalltomoderateearthquakesandserviceloadsandareexpectedtofuseatthedesigneventearthquakelevelofaccelerationtolimitthedemandandcontrolthedamageintheabutmentsandsupportingpiles/shafts.Linearelasticanalysiscannotcapturetheinelasticresponseofthegirderstops,wingwallsorpiles/shafts.Therefore,theforcesgeneratedwithelasticdemandassessmentmodelsshouldnotbeusedtosizetheabutmentgirderstops.Girderstopsforabutmentssupportedonaspreadfootingshallbedesignedtosustainthelesseroftheaccelerationcoefficient,As,timesthesuperstructuredeadloadreactionattheabutmentplustheweightofabutmentanditsfootingorslidingfrictionforcesofspreadfootings.Girderstopsforpile/shaftsupportedfoundationsshallbedesignedtosustainthesumof75percenttotallateralcapacityofthepiles/shaftsandshearcapacityofonewingwall.
Theelasticresistancemaybetakentoincludetheuseofbearingsdesignedtoaccommodatethedesigndisplacements,soilfrictionalresistanceactingagainstthebaseofaspreadfootingsupportedabutment,orpileresistanceprovidedbypilesactingintheirelasticrange.
Thestiffnessoffusingorbreakawayabutmentelementssuchaswingwalls(yieldingornon-yielding),elastomericbearings,andslidingfootingsshallnotbereliedupontoreducedisplacementdemandsatintermediatepiers.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-15 June 2017
Unlessfixedbearingsareused,girderstopsshallbeprovidedbetweenallgirdersregardlessoftheelasticseismicdemand.Thedesignofgirderstopsshouldconsiderthatunequalforcesthatmaydevelopineachstop.
Whenfusinggirderstops,transverseshearkeys,orotherelementsthatpotentiallyreleasetherestraintofthesuperstructureareused,thenadequatesupportlengthmeetingtherequirementsofArticle4.12oftheAASHTOSEISMICmustbeprovided.Additionally,theexpectedredistributionofinternalforcesinthesuperstructureandotherbridgesystemelementmustbeconsidered.Boundinganalysesconsideringincrementalreleaseoftransverserestraintateachendofthebridgeshouldalsobeconsidered.
5.2.4 - Curved and Skewed Bridges
PassiveearthpressureatabutmentsmaybeconsideredasakeyelementoftheERSofstraightandcurvedbridgeswithabutmentskewsupto20degrees.Forlargerskews,duetoacombinationoflongitudinalandtransverseresponse,thespanhasatendencytorotateinthedirectionofdecreasingskew.Suchmotionwilltendtocausebindingintheobtusecornerandgenerateunevenpassiveearthpressureforcesontheabutment,exceedingthepassivepressurenearoneendofthebackwall,andprovidinglittleornoresistanceatotherend.Thisrequiresamorerefinedanalysistodeterminetheamountofexpectedmovement.Thepassivepressureresistanceinsoilsbehindsemi-integralorL-shapeabutmentsshallbebasedontheprojectedwidthoftheabutmentwallnormaltothecenterlineofthebridge.Abutmentspringsshallbeincludedinthelocalcoordinatesystemoftheabutmentwall.
4.2.12 Foundation – GeneralGuide Specifications Article 5.3.1–Therequiredfoundationmodelingmethod(FMM)andtherequirementsforestimationoffoundationspringsforspreadfootings,pilefoundations,anddrilledshaftsshallbebasedontheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer’srecommendations.
4.2.13 Foundation – Spread FootingGuide Specifications Article C5.3.2 –FoundationspringsforspreadfootingsshallbedeterminedinaccordancewithSection7.2.7,Geotechnical Design Manual Section6.5.1.1andtheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer’srecommendations.
4.2.14 Procedure 3: Nonlinear Time History MethodGuide Specifications Article 5.4.4–ThetimehistoriesofinputaccelerationusedtodescribetheearthquakeloadsshallbeselectedinconsultationwiththeWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineerandtheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
4.2.15 Ieff for Box Girder SuperstructureGuide Specifications Article 5.6.3–Grossmomentofinertiashallbeusedforboxgirdersuperstructuremodeling.
4.2.16 Foundation RockingGuide Specifications Article 6.3.9–FoundationrockingshallnotbeusedforthedesignofWSDOTbridges.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-16 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.2.17 Drilled ShaftsGuide Specifications Article C6.5–ForWSDOTbridges,thescalefactorforp-ycurvesorsubgrademodulusforlargediametershaftsshallnotbeusedunlessapprovedbytheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineerandWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
4.2.18 Longitudinal Direction RequirementsGuide Specifications Article 6.7.1 – Case2:EarthquakeResistingSystem(ERS)withabutmentcontributionmaybeusedprovidedthatthemobilizedlongitudinalpassivepressureisnotgreaterthan70percentofthevalueobtainedusingproceduregiveninArticle5.2.2.1.
4.2.19 Liquefaction Design RequirementsGuide Specifications Article 6.8–SoilliquefactionassessmentshallbebasedontheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer’srecommendationandGeotechnical Design Manual Section6.4.2.8.
4.2.20 Reinforcing SteelGuide Specifications Article 8.4.1–Reinforcingbars,deformedwire,cold-drawwire,weldedplainwirefabricandweldeddeformedwirefabricshallconformtothematerialstandardsasspecifiedinAASHTOLRFD.
ASTMA615reinforcementshallnotbeusedinWSDOTBridges.OnlyASTMA706Grade60reinforcingsteelshallbeusedinmemberswhereplastichingingisexpectedforSDCsB,C,andD.ASTMA706Grade80reinforcingsteelsmaybeusedforcapacity-protectedmembersasspecifiedinArticle8.9.ASTMA706Grade80reinforcingsteelshallnotbeusedforoversizedshaftswhereingroundplastichingingisconsideredasapartofERS.
DeformedweldedwirefabricmaybeusedwiththeWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapproval.
Wireropeorstrandsforspiralsandhighstrengthbarswithyieldstrengthinexcessof75ksishallnotbeused.
Guide Specifications Article C8.4.1–AddthefollowingparagraphtoArticleC8.4.1.
TherequirementforplastichingingandcapacityprotectedmembersdonotapplytothestructuresinSDCA,thereforeuseofASTMA706Grade80reinforcingsteelispermittedinSDCA.
ForSDCsB,C,andD,themoment-curvatureanalysesbasedonstraincompatibilityandnonlinearstressstrainrelationsareusedtodeterminetheplasticmomentcapacitiesofallductileconcretemembers.Furtherresearchisrequiredtoestablishtheshapeandmodelofthestress-straincurve,expectedreinforcingstrengths,strainlimits,andthestress-strainrelationshipsforconcreteconfinedbylateralreinforcementmadewithASTMA706Grade80reinforcingsteel.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-17 June 2017
4.2.21 Concrete ModelingGuide Specifications Article 8.4.4- Revise the last paragraph as follows:
Wherein-groundplastichingingapprovedbytheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineerispartoftheERS,theconfinedconcretecoreshallbelimitedtoamaximumcompressivestrainof0.008.Theclearspacingbetweenthelongitudinalreinforcementsandbetweenspiralsandhoopsindrilledshaftsshallnotbelessthan6inchesormorethan8incheswhentremieplacementofconcreteisanticipated.
4.2.22 Expected Nominal Moment CapacityGuide Specifications Article 8.5–Addthefollowingparagraphsafterthirdparagraph.
TheexpectednominalcapacityofcapacityprotectedmemberusingASTMA706Grade80reinforcementshallbedeterminedbystrengthdesignbasedontheexpectedconcretestrengthandyieldstrengthof80ksiwhentheconcretereaches0.003orthereinforcingsteelstrainreaches0.090for#10barsandsmaller,0.060for#11barsandlarger.
Replacethedefinitionof
4.2.18 Longitudinal Direction Requirements
4.2.19 Liquefaction Design Requirements
Guide Specifications Article 6.8 – SoilliquefactionassessmentshallbebasedontheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer’srecommendationandWSDOTGeotechnical Design Manual Section6.4.2.8.
4.2.20 Reinforcing Steel
4.2.21 Concrete Modeling
4.2.22 Expected Nominal Moment Capacity
Guide Specifications Article 8.5 – Addthefollowingparagraphsafterthethirdparagraph.
Theexpectednominalcapacityofcapacityprotectedmembers usingASTMA706Grade80reinforcementshallbedeterminedby strengthdesignformulasspecifiedintheAASHTO LRFD Bridge design Specifications basedontheexpectedconcretestrengthandreinforcingsteelyieldstrengthswhentheconcretereaches 0.003orthereinforcingsteelstrainreaches0.090for#10barsandsmaller,0.060for#11barsandlarger.
Replacethedefinitionof moλ withthefollowing:
moλ =overstrengthfactor
=1.2forASTMA706Grade60reinforcement=1.4forASTMA615Grade60reinforcement
4.2.23 Interlocking Bar Size
Guide Specifications Article 8.6.7 – Thelongitudinalreinforcingbarinsidetheinterlockingportionofa column(interlockingbars)shallbethesamesizeofbarsusedoutsidetheinterlockingportion.
4.2.24 Splicing of Longitudinal Reinforcement in Columns Subject to Ductility Demands for SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.8.3 – Thesplicingoflongitudinalcolumnreinforcementoutsidetheplastichingingregionshallbeaccomplishedusingmechanicalcouplersthatarecapableofdevelopingthetensilestrengthof thesplicedbar.Splicesshallbestaggeredatleast2ft.Lapsplicesshallnotbeused.Thedesignengineershallclearlyidentifythelocationswheresplicesinlongitudinalcolumnreinforcementarepermittedontheplans.Ingeneralwherethelengthoftherebarcageislessthan60ft(72ftforNo.14andNo.18bars),nospliceinthelongitudinalreinforcementshallbeallowed.
4.2.25 Development Length for Column Bars Extended into Oversized Pile
withthefollowing:
4.2.18 Longitudinal Direction Requirements
4.2.19 Liquefaction Design Requirements
Guide Specifications Article 6.8 – SoilliquefactionassessmentshallbebasedontheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer’srecommendationandWSDOTGeotechnical Design Manual Section6.4.2.8.
4.2.20 Reinforcing Steel
4.2.21 Concrete Modeling
4.2.22 Expected Nominal Moment Capacity
Guide Specifications Article 8.5 – Addthefollowingparagraphsafterthethirdparagraph.
Theexpectednominalcapacityofcapacityprotectedmembers usingASTMA706Grade80reinforcementshallbedeterminedby strengthdesignformulasspecifiedintheAASHTO LRFD Bridge design Specifications basedontheexpectedconcretestrengthandreinforcingsteelyieldstrengthswhentheconcretereaches 0.003orthereinforcingsteelstrainreaches0.090for#10barsandsmaller,0.060for#11barsandlarger.
Replacethedefinitionof moλ withthefollowing:
moλ =overstrengthfactor
=1.2forASTMA706Grade60reinforcement=1.4forASTMA615Grade60reinforcement
4.2.23 Interlocking Bar Size
Guide Specifications Article 8.6.7 – Thelongitudinalreinforcingbarinsidetheinterlockingportionofa column(interlockingbars)shallbethesamesizeofbarsusedoutsidetheinterlockingportion.
4.2.24 Splicing of Longitudinal Reinforcement in Columns Subject to Ductility Demands for SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.8.3 – Thesplicingoflongitudinalcolumnreinforcementoutsidetheplastichingingregionshallbeaccomplishedusingmechanicalcouplersthatarecapableofdevelopingthetensilestrengthof thesplicedbar.Splicesshallbestaggeredatleast2ft.Lapsplicesshallnotbeused.Thedesignengineershallclearlyidentifythelocationswheresplicesinlongitudinalcolumnreinforcementarepermittedontheplans.Ingeneralwherethelengthoftherebarcageislessthan60ft(72ftforNo.14andNo.18bars),nospliceinthelongitudinalreinforcementshallbeallowed.
4.2.25 Development Length for Column Bars Extended into Oversized Pile
= overstrengthfactor = 1.2forASTMA706Grade60reinforcement = 1.4forASTMA615Grade60reinforcement
4.2.23 Interlocking Bar SizeGuide Specifications Article 8.6.7–Thelongitudinalreinforcingbarinsidetheinterlockingportionofcolumn(interlockingbars)shallbethesamesizeofbarsusedoutsidetheinterlockingportion.
4.2.24 Splicing of Longitudinal Reinforcement in Columns Subject to Ductility Demands for SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.8.3–Thesplicingoflongitudinalcolumnreinforcementoutsidetheplastichingingregionshallbeaccomplishedusingmechanicalcouplersthatarecapableofdevelopingthetensilestrengthofthesplicedbar.Splicesshallbestaggeredatleast2feet.Lapsplicesshallnotbeused.Thedesignengineershallclearlyidentifythelocationswheresplicesinlongitudinalcolumnreinforcementarepermittedontheplans.Ingeneralwherethelengthoftherebarcageislessthan60ft(72ftforNo.14andNo.18bars),nospliceinthelongitudinalreinforcementshallbeallowed.
4.2.25 Development Length for Column Bars Extended into Oversized Pile Shafts f or SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.8.10–ExtendingcolumnbarsintooversizedshaftshallbeperSection7.4.4.C,basedonTRACReportWA-RD417.1“Non-ContactLapSpliceinBridgeColumn-ShaftConnections.”
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-18 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.2.26 Lateral Confinement for Oversized Pile Shaft for SDCs C and D Guide Specifications Article 8.8.12–Therequirementofthisarticleforshaftlateralreinforcementinthecolumn-shaftsplicezonemaybereplacedwithSection7.8.2K.
4.2.27 Lateral Confinement for Non-Oversized Strengthened Pile Shaft for SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.8.13–Nonoversizedcolumnshaft(thecrosssectionoftheconfinedcoreisthesameforboththecolumnandthepileshaft)isnotpermissibleunlessapprovedbytheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
4.2.28 Requirements for Capacity Protected MembersGuide Specifications Article 8.9–Addthefollowingparagraphs:
ForSDCsCandDwhereliquefactionisidentified,withtheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapproval,pileanddrilledshaftin-groundhingingmaybeconsideredasanERE.Wherein-groundhingingispartofERS,theconfinedconcretecoreshouldbelimitedtoamaximumcompressivestrainof0.008andthememberductilitydemandshallbelimitedto4.
Bridgesshallbeanalyzedanddesignedforthenon-liquefiedconditionandtheliquefiedconditioninaccordancewithArticle6.8.ThecapacityprotectedmembersshallbedesignedinaccordancewiththerequirementsofArticle4.11.Toensuretheformationofplastichingesincolumns,oversizedpileshaftsshallbedesignedforanexpectednominalmomentcapacity,Mne,atanylocationalongtheshaft,thatis,equalto1.25timesmomentdemandgeneratedbytheoverstrengthcolumnplastichingemomentandassociatedshearforceatthebaseofthecolumn.Thesafetyfactorof1.25maybereducedto1.0dependingonthesoilpropertiesandupontheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer’sapproval.
Thedesignmomentsbelowgroundforextendedpileshaftmaybedeterminedusingthenonlinearstaticprocedure(pushoveranalysis)bypushingthemlaterallytothedisplacementdemandobtainedfromanelasticresponsespectrumanalysis.Thepointofmaximummomentshallbeidentifiedbasedonthemomentdiagram.Theexpectedplastichingezoneshallextend3Daboveandbelowthepointofmaximummoment.Theplastichingezoneshallbedesignatedasthe“nosplice”zoneandthetransversesteelforshearandconfinementshallbeprovidedaccordingly.
4.2.29 Superstructure Capacity Design for Transverse Direction (Integral Bent Cap) for SDCs C and D
Guide Specifications Article 8.11–Revisethelastparagraphasfollows:
ForSDCsCandD,thelongitudinalflexuralbentcapbeamreinforcementshallbecontinuous.Splicingofcapbeamlongitudinalflexuralreinforcementshallbeaccomplishedusingmechanicalcouplersthatarecapableofdevelopingaminimumtensilestrengthof85ksi.Splicesshallbestaggeredatleast2feet.Lapsplicesshallnotbeused.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-19 June 2017
4.2.30 Superstructure Design for Non Integral Bent Caps for SDCs B, C, and DGuide Specifications Article 8.12–NonintegralbentcapsshallnotbeusedforcontinuousconcretebridgesinSDCB,C,andDexceptattheexpansionjointsbetweensuperstructuresegments.
4.2.31 Joint ProportioningGuide Specifications Article 8.13.4.1.1 –Revisethelastbulletasfollows:
Exteriorcolumnjointsforboxgirdersuperstructureandothersuperstructuresifthecapbeamextendsthejointfarenoughtodevelopthelongitudinalcapreinforcement.
4.2.32 Cast-in-Place and Precast Concrete PilesGuide Specifications Article 8.16.2–Minimumlongitudinalreinforcementof0.75percentofAgshallbeprovidedforCIPpilesinSDCsB,C,andD.LongitudinalreinforcementshallbeprovidedforthefulllengthofpileunlessapprovedbytheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-20 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.3 SeismicDesignRequirementsforBridgeModificationsandWideningProjects
4.3.1 GeneralAbridgewideningisdefinedaswheresubstructurebentsaremodifiedandnewcolumnsorpiersareadded,oranincreaseofbridgedeckwidthorwideningstothesidewalkorbarrierrailsofanexistingbridgeresultinginsignificantmassincreaseorstructuralchanges.
BridgewideningsinWashingtonStateshallbedesignedinaccordancewiththerequirementsofthecurrenteditionoftheAASHTOLRFD.TheseismicdesignshallbeinaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheAASHTOSEISMIC,andWSDOTBDM. ThespectralresponseparametersshallbedeterminedusingUSGS2014SeismicHazardMapsandSiteCoefficientsdefinedinSection4.2.3. Thewideningportion(newstructure)shallbedesignedtomeetcurrentWSDOTstandardsfornewbridges.Seismicanalysisisnotrequiredforsingle-spanbridgesandbridgesinSDCA.However,existingelementsofsinglespanbridgesshallmeettherequirementsofAASHTOSeismicasapplicable.
4.3.2 Bridge Widening Project ClassificationBridgewideningprojectsareclassifiedaccordingtothescopeofworkaseitherminorormajorwideningprojects.
A. Minor Modification and Widening Projects
Abridgewideningprojectisclassifiedasaminorwideningprojectifallofthefollowingconditionsaremet:• Substructurebentsarenotmodifiedandnonewcolumnsorpiersareadded,whileabutmentsmaybewidenedtoaccommodatetheincreaseofbridgedeckwidth.
• Thenetsuperstructuremassincreaseisequalorlessthan10percentoftheoriginalsuperstructuremass.
• Fixityconditionsofthefoundationsareunchanged.• Therearenomajorchangesoftheseismicityofthebridgesitethatcanincreaseseismichazardlevelsorreduceseismicperformanceofthestructuresincetheinitialscreeningormostrecentseismicretrofit.
• Nochangeinliveloaduseofthebridge
B. Major Modifications and Widening Projects
Abridgewideningprojectisclassifiedasamajorwideningprojectifanyofthefollowingconditionsaremet:• Substructurebentsaremodifiedandnewcolumnsorpiersareadded,exceptingabutments,whichmaybewidenedtoaccommodatetheincreaseofbridgedeckwidth.
• Thenetsuperstructuremassincreaseismorethan20percentoftheoriginalsuperstructuremass.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-21 June 2017
• Fixityconditionsofthefoundationsarechanged.• Therearemajorchangesoftheseismicityofthebridgesitethatcanincreaseseismichazardlevelsorreduceseismicperformanceofthestructuresincetheinitialscreeningormostrecentseismicretrofit.
• Changeinliveloaduseofthebridge
Majorchangesinseismicityinclude,butarenotlimitedto,thefollowing:nearfaulteffect,significantliquefactionpotential,orlateralspreading.IfthereareconcernsaboutchangestotheSeismicDesignResponseSpectrumatthebridgesite,aboutapreviousretrofittotheexistingbridge,oranunusualimbalanceofmassdistributionresultingfromthestructurewidening,thedesignershouldconsulttheWSDOTBridgeandStructuresOffice.
4.3.3 Seismic Design Guidance:TheSeismicDesignguidanceforBridgeModificationsandWideningareasfollows:
1. BridgewideningprojectsclassifiedasMinorWideningprojectsdonotrequireeitheraseismicevaluationoraretrofitofthestructure.IftheconditionsforMinorWideningprojectaremet,itisanticipatedthatthewidened/modifiedstructurewillnotdrawenoughadditionalseismicdemandtosignificantlyaffecttheexistingsub-structureelements.
2. Ifthenetsuperstructuremassincreaseisbetween10percentto20percentoftheoriginalsuperstructuremass,andifalltheotherbulletedcriterialistedforMinorWideningprojectsaremet,thenthe“DoNoHarm”policyandprofessionaljudgmentcouldbeuseduponapprovaloftheBridgeDesignEngineer.The"DoNoHarm"policyrequiresthedesignertocomparetheC/Dratiosoftheexistingbridgeelementsinthebeforewideningconditiontothoseoftheafterwideningcondition.IftheC/Dratiosarenotdecreased,thewideningcanbedesignedandconstructedwithoutretrofittingexistingdeficientbridgeelements.ElementsoftheexistingstructurewithC/Dratiosmadeworsebythewidening/modificationworkshallberetrofittedtorestoretheirC/Dratiostobefore-wideningvalues,ataminimum.Foundationelementswithseismicdeficiencies(C/Dratiosmadeworsebythewidening/modificationwork)shallbedeferredtotheSeismicRetrofitProgramforrehabilitation.
3. SeismicanalysisisrequiredforallMajorModificationsandWideningprojectsatprojectscopinglevel.AcompleteseismicanalysisisrequiredforbridgesinSeismicDesignCategory(SDC)B,C,andDformajormodificationsandwideningprojectsasdescribedbelow.Aprojectgeotechnicalreport(includinganyunstablesoilorliquefactionissues)shallbeavailabletothestructuralengineerforseismicanalysis.Seismicanalysisshallbeperformedforbothexistingandwidenedstructures.Capacity/Demand(C/D)ratiosarerequiredforexistingbridgeelementsincludingfoundation.
4. ThewideningportionofthestructureshallbedesignedforliquefiablesoilsconditioninaccordancetotheAASHTOSeismic,andWSDOTBDM,unlesssoilsimprovementisprovidedtoeliminateliquefaction.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-22 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
5. SeismicimprovementofexistingcolumnsandcrossbeamstoC/D>1.0isrequired.Thecostofseismicimprovementshallbepaidforwithwideningprojectfunding(notfromtheRetrofitProgram).TheseismicretrofitoftheexistingstructureshallconformtotheBDM,whilethenewlywidenedportionsofthebridgeshallcomplywiththeAASHTOSeismic,exceptforbalancedstiffnesscriteria,whichmaybedifficulttomeetduetotheexistingbridgeconfiguration.However,thedesignershouldstriveforthebestbalancedframestiffnessfortheentirewidenedstructurethatisattainableinacosteffectivemanner.MajorWideningProjectsrequirethedesignertodeterminetheseismicC/Dratiosoftheexistingbridgeelementsinthefinalwidenedcondition.IftheC/Dratiosofcolumnsandcrossbeamofexistingstructurearelessthan1.0,theimprovementofseismicallydeficientelementsismandatoryandthewideningprojectshallincludetheimprovementofexistingseismicallydeficientbridgeelementstoC/Dratioofabove1.0aspartofthewideningprojectfunding.TheC/Dratioof1.0isrequiredtopreventthecollapseofthebridgeduringtheseismiceventasrequiredforlifesafety.Seismicimprovementoftheexistingfoundationelements(footings,pilecaps,piles,andshaftstoC/Dratios>1.0)couldbedeferredtotheBridgeSeismicRetrofitProgram.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-23 June 2017
ModificationsorWidening Alterations SeismicDesignGuidance IllustrationMinorModifications• Deck Rehabilitations• Traffic Barrier
Replacements• sidewalk addition/
rehabilitation • No change in LL use
• Superstructure mass increase is less than 10%
• Fixity conditions are not changed
• Do not Require seismic evaluation
• Do not require retrofit of the structure
MajorModificationsMinor Modifications PLUS• Replacing/adding girder
and slab • Change in LL use
• Superstructure mass increase between 10% to 20% and/or
• Fixity conditions are changed
• Seismic evaluation of the structure is required .
• Do-No-Harm is required for substructure .
• Do-No-Harm is required for foundation .
MajorWidening–Case1Minor Modifications PLUS• Superstructure or Bent
Widening
• Superstructure mass increase is more than > 20% and/or
• Substructure/bents modified and/or
• Fixity conditions are changed
• Seismic evaluation of the structure is required .
• C/D ratio of equal or greater than 1 .0 is required for substructure .
• Do-No-Harm could be used for Foundation .
MajorWidening–Case2• widening on one side
• Substructure or bents are modified. Columns are added on one side .
• Seismic evaluation of the structure is required .
• C/D ratio of equal or greater than 1 .0 is required for substructure .
• Do-No-Harm could be used for Foundation .
MajorWidening–Case3• widening on both sides
• Substructure or bents are modified. Columns are added on both sides .
• Seismic evaluation of the structure is required .
• C/D ratio of equal or greater than 1 .0 is required for substructure .
• Do-No-Harm could be used for Foundation .
SeismicDesignCriteriaforBridgeModificationsandWideningFigure 4.3-1
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-24 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.3.4 Scoping for Bridge Widening and Liquefaction MitigationTheRegionprojectmanagershouldcontacttheBridgeOfficeforbridgewideningandretainingwallscopingassistancebeforeprojectfundingcommitmentsaremadetothelegislatureandthepublic.TheBridgeOfficewillworkwiththeGeotechnicalOfficetoassessthepotentialforliquefactionorotherseismichazardsthatcouldaffectthecostoftheproposedstructures.TheinitialevaluationdesigntimeandassociatedcostsfortheGeotechnicalandBridgeOfficesshallbeconsideredatthescopingphase.
4.3.5 Design and Detailing ConsiderationsSupport Length–Thesupportlengthatexistingabutments,piers,in-spanhinges,andpavementseatsshallbechecked.Ifthereisaneedforlongitudinalrestrainers,transverserestrainers,oradditionalsupportlengthontheexistingstructure,theyshallbeincludedinthewideningdesign.
Connections Between Existing and New Elements–Connectionsbetweenthenewelementsandexistingelementsshouldbedesignedformaximumover-strengthforces.Whereyieldingisexpectedinthecrossbeamconnectionattheextremeeventlimitstate,thenewstructureshallbedesignedtocarryliveloadsindependentlyattheStrengthIlimitstate.Incaseswherelargedifferentialsettlementand/oraliquefaction-inducedlossofbearingstrengthareexpected,theconnectionsmaybedesignedtodeflectorhingeinordertoisolatethetwopartsofthestructure.Elementssubjecttoinelasticbehaviorshallbedesignedanddetailedtosustaintheexpecteddeformations.
Longitudinaljointsbetweentheexistingandnewstructurearenotpermitted.
Differential Settlement–Thegeotechnicaldesignershouldevaluatethepotentialfordifferentialsettlementbetweentheexistingstructureandwideningstructure.Additionalgeotechnicalmeasuresmayberequiredtolimitdifferentialsettlementstotolerablelevelsforbothstaticandseismicconditions.Thebridgedesignershallevaluate,design,anddetailallelementsofnewandexistingportionsofthewidenedstructureforthedifferentialsettlementwarrantedbytheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer.Angulardistortionsbetweenadjacentfoundationsgreaterthan0.008(RAD)insimplespansand0.004(RAD)incontinuousspansshouldnotbepermittedinsettlementcriteria.
Thehorizontaldisplacementofpileandshaftfoundationsshallbeestimatedusingproceduresthatconsidersoil-structureinteraction(seeGeotechnical Design Manual Section8.12.2.3).Horizontalmovementcriteriashouldbeestablishedatthetopofthefoundationbasedonthetoleranceofthestructuretolateralmovementwithconsiderationofthecolumnlengthandstiffness.Toleranceofthesuperstructuretolateralmovementwilldependonbridgeseatwidths,bearingtype(s),structuretype,andloaddistributioneffects.
Foundation Types–Thefoundationtypeofthenewstructureshouldmatchthatoftheexistingstructure.However,adifferenttypeoffoundationmaybeusedforthenewstructureduetogeotechnicalrecommendationsorthelimitedspaceavailablebetweenexistingandnewstructures.Forexample,ashaftfoundationmaybeusedinlieuofspreadfooting.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-25 June 2017
Existing Strutted Columns–Thehorizontalstrutbetweenexistingcolumnsmayberemoved.Theexistingcolumnsshallthenbeanalyzedwiththenewunbracedlengthandretrofittedifnecessary.
Non Structural Element Stiffness–Medianbarrierandotherpotentiallystiffeningelementsshallbeisolatedfromthecolumnstoavoidanyadditionalstiffnesstothesystem.
DeformationcapacitiesofexistingbridgemembersthatdonotmeetcurrentdetailingstandardsshallbedeterminedusingtheprovisionsofSection7.8oftheRetrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges,FHWA-HRT-06-032.DeformationcapacitiesofexistingbridgemembersthatmeetcurrentdetailingstandardsshallbedeterminedusingthelatesteditionoftheAASHTOSEISMIC.
JointshearcapacitiesofexistingstructuresshallbecheckedusingCaltrans Bridge Design Aid,14-4JointShearModelingGuidelinesforExistingStructures.
Inlieuofspecificdata,thereinforcementpropertiesprovidedinTable4.3.2-1shouldbeused.
Property Notation BarSizeASTM A706
ASTM A615 Grade 60
ASTM A615 Grade 40*
Specified minimum yield stress (ksi) ƒy No . 3 - No . 18 60 60 40Expected yield stress (ksi) ƒye No . 3 - No . 18 68 68 48Expected tensile strength (ksi) ƒue No . 3 - No . 18 95 95 81Expected yield strain εye No . 3 - No . 18 0 .0023 0 .0023 0 .00166
Onset of strain hardening εsh
No . 3 - No . 8 0 .0150 0 .0150
0 .0193No . 9 0 .0125 0 .0125
No . 10 & No . 11 0 .0115 0 .0115No . 14 0 .0075 0 .0075No . 18 0 .0050 0 .0050
Reduced ultimate tensile strain
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4.3-4 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 July 2011
• Deformation capacities of existing bridge members that do not meet current detailing standards shall be determined using the provisions of Section 7.8 of the Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges, FHWA-HRT-06-032. Deformation capacities of existing bridge members that meet current detailing standards shall be determined using the latest edition of the AASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design.
• Joint shear capacities of existing structures shall be checked using Caltrans Bridge Design Aid, 14-4 Joint Shear Modeling Guidelines for Existing Structures.
• In lieu of specific data, the reinforcement properties provided in Table 4.3.2-1 should be used.
Property Notation Bar Size ASTM A706
ASTM A615 Grade 60
ASTM A615 Grade 40
Specified minimum yield stress (ksi) ƒy #3 - #18 60 60 40
Expected yield stress (ksi) ƒye #3 - #18 68 68 48
Expected tensile strength (ksi) ƒue #3 - #18 95 95 81
Expected yield strain εye #3 - #18 0 .0023 0 .0023 0 .00166
Onset of strain hardening εsh
#3 - #8 0 .0150 0 .0150
0 .0193#9 0 .0125 0 .0125
#10 & #11 0 .0115 0 .0115#14 0 .0075 0 .0075#18 0 .0050 0 .0050
Reduced ultimate tensile strain
BDM Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
Bridge Design Manual M23-50-02 Page 31
Property Notation Bar Size ASTMA706
ASTM A615 Grade 60
ASTM A615 Grade 40
Specifiedminimum yield stress (ksi)
yf #3 - #18 60 60 40
Expected yield stress (ksi) yef #3 - #18 68 68 48
Expectedtensile strength (ksi)
uef #3 - #18 95 95 81
Expected yield strain ye #3 - #18 0.0023 0.0023 0.00166
Onset of strain hardening sh
#3 - #8 0.0150 0.0150
0.0193
#9 0.0125 0.0125
#10 & #11 0.0115 0.0115
#14 0.0075 0.0075
#18 0.0050 0.0050 Reducedultimate tensile strain
Rsu
#4 - #10 0.090 0.060 0.090
#11 - #18 0.060 0.040 0.060
Ultimate tensile strain su
#4 - #10 0.120 0.090 0.120
#11 - #18 0.090 0.060 0.090
Table 4.3.2-1 Stress Properties of Reinforcing Steel Bars.
#4 - #10 0 .090 0 .060 0 .090#11 - #18 0 .060 0 .040 0 .060
Ultimate tensile strain εsu
#4 - #10 0 .120 0 .090 0 .120#11 - #18 0 .090 0 .060 0 .090
Stress Properties of Reinforcing Steel BarsTable 4.3.2-1
No . 4 - No . 10 0 .090 0 .060 0 .090No . 11 - No . 18 0 .060 0 .040 0 .060
Ultimate tensile strain εsuNo . 4 - No . 10 0 .120 0 .090 0 .120No . 11 - No . 18 0 .090 0 .060 0 .090
* ASTM A615 Grade 40 is for existing bridges in widening projects .
StressPropertiesofReinforcingSteelBarsTable 4.3.2-1
Isolation Bearings–Isolationbearingsmaybeusedforbridgewideningprojectstoreducetheseismicdemandthroughmodificationofthedynamicpropertiesofthebridge.Thesebearingsareaviablealternativetostrengtheningweakelementsornon-ductilebridgesubstructuremembersoftheexistingbridge.UseofisolationbearingsneedstheapprovalofWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.IsolationbearingsshallbedesignedpertherequirementsspecifiedinSection9.3.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-26 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.4 SeismicRetrofittingofExistingBridgesSeismicretrofittingofexistingbridgesshallbeperformedinaccordancewiththeFHWApublicationFHWA-HRT-06-032,Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – BridgesandWSDOTamendmentsasfollows:• Article1.5.3ThespectralresponseparametersshallbedeterminedusingUSGS2014SeismicHazardMapsandSiteCoefficientsdefinedinSection4.2.3.
• Article7.4.2SeismicLoadinginTwoorThreeOrthogonalDirections
Revisethefirstparagraphasfollows:
Whencombiningtheresponseoftwoorthreeorthogonaldirectionsthedesignvalueofanyquantityofinterest(displacement,bendingmoment,shearoraxialforce)shallbeobtainedbythe100-30percentcombinationruleasdescribedinAASHTOGuide SpecificationsArticle4.4.• DeleteEq.7.44andreplacewiththefollowing:
Lp=themaximumof[(8800εydb)or(0.08L+4400εydb)] (7-44)
• DeleteEq.7.49andreplacewiththefollowing:
4.4 SeismicRetrofittingof ExistingBridgesSeismicretrofittingofexistingbridgesshallbeperformedinaccordancewiththeFHWApublicationFHWA-HRT-06-032, Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges andWSDOTamendmentsasfollows:
• Article7.4.2SeismicLoadinginTwoorThreeOrthogonalDirectionsRevisethefirstparagraphasfollows:Whencombiningtheresponseoftwoorthreeorthogonaldirectionsthedesignvalueofanyquantityofinterest(displacement,bendingmoment,shearoraxialforce)shallbeobtainedbythe100-30percentcombinationruleasdescribedinAASHTO Guide Specifications Article4.4.
• DeleteEq.7.49andreplacewiththefollowing:
(7.49)
• DeleteEq.7.51andreplacewiththefollowing:
(7.51)
4.4.1 Seismic Analysis RequirementsThefirststepinretrofittingabridgeistoanalyzetheexistingstructuretoidentifyseismicallydeficientelements.Theinitialanalysisconsistsofgeneratingcapacity/demandratiosforallrelevantbridgecomponents.Seismicdisplacementandforcedemandsshallbedeterminedusingthemulti-modespectralanalysisofSeismic Retrofitting Manual Section5.4.2.2(asaminimum).Prescriptiverequirements,suchassupportlength,shallbeconsideredmandatoryandshallbeincludedintheanalysis.Seismic capacitiesshallbedeterminedinaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manual.DisplacementcapacitiesshallbedeterminedbytheMethodD2– StructureCapacity/Demand(Pushover)MethodofSeismic Retrofitting Manual Section5.6.Theseismicanalysisneedonlybeperformedfortheupperlevel(1,000yearreturnperiod)groundmotionswithalifesafetyseismicperformancelevel.
4.4.2 Seismic Retrofit Design
Onceseismicallydeficientbridgeelementshavebeenidentified,appropriateretrofitmeasuresshallbeselectedanddesigned.Table 1-11,Chapters8,9,10,11,andAppendicesDthruFoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manual shallbeused inselectinganddesigningtheseismicretrofitmeasures.TheWSDOTBridgeandStructureOfficeSeismicSpecialistwill beconsulted intheselectionanddesignoftheretrofit measures.
yfi
mip VV
VV φφ
+
−−
= 25
yjfji
jhjip VV
VVφφ
+
−
−= 24
(7 .49)
• DeleteEq.7.51andreplacewiththefollowing:
4.4 SeismicRetrofittingof ExistingBridgesSeismicretrofittingofexistingbridgesshallbeperformedinaccordancewiththeFHWApublicationFHWA-HRT-06-032, Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 – Bridges andWSDOTamendmentsasfollows:
• Article7.4.2SeismicLoadinginTwoorThreeOrthogonalDirectionsRevisethefirstparagraphasfollows:Whencombiningtheresponseoftwoorthreeorthogonaldirectionsthedesignvalueofanyquantityofinterest(displacement,bendingmoment,shearoraxialforce)shallbeobtainedbythe100-30percentcombinationruleasdescribedinAASHTO Guide Specifications Article4.4.
• DeleteEq.7.49andreplacewiththefollowing:
(7.49)
• DeleteEq.7.51andreplacewiththefollowing:
(7.51)
4.4.1 Seismic Analysis RequirementsThefirststepinretrofittingabridgeistoanalyzetheexistingstructuretoidentifyseismicallydeficientelements.Theinitialanalysisconsistsofgeneratingcapacity/demandratiosforallrelevantbridgecomponents.Seismicdisplacementandforcedemandsshallbedeterminedusingthemulti-modespectralanalysisofSeismic Retrofitting Manual Section5.4.2.2(asaminimum).Prescriptiverequirements,suchassupportlength,shallbeconsideredmandatoryandshallbeincludedintheanalysis.Seismic capacitiesshallbedeterminedinaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manual.DisplacementcapacitiesshallbedeterminedbytheMethodD2– StructureCapacity/Demand(Pushover)MethodofSeismic Retrofitting Manual Section5.6.Theseismicanalysisneedonlybeperformedfortheupperlevel(1,000yearreturnperiod)groundmotionswithalifesafetyseismicperformancelevel.
4.4.2 Seismic Retrofit Design
Onceseismicallydeficientbridgeelementshavebeenidentified,appropriateretrofitmeasuresshallbeselectedanddesigned.Table 1-11,Chapters8,9,10,11,andAppendicesDthruFoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manual shallbeused inselectinganddesigningtheseismicretrofitmeasures.TheWSDOTBridgeandStructureOfficeSeismicSpecialistwill beconsulted intheselectionanddesignoftheretrofit measures.
yfi
mip VV
VV φφ
+
−−
= 25
yjfji
jhjip VV
VVφφ
+
−
−= 24 (7 .51)
4.4.1 Seismic Analysis RequirementsThefirststepinretrofittingabridgeistoanalyzetheexistingstructuretoidentifyseismicallydeficientelements.Theinitialanalysisconsistsofgeneratingcapacity/demandratiosforallrelevantbridgecomponents.Seismicdisplacementandforcedemandsshallbedeterminedusingthemulti-modespectralanalysisofSection5.4.2.2(ataminimum).Prescriptiverequirements,suchassupportlength,shallbeconsideredademandandshallbeincludedintheanalysis.SeismiccapacitiesshallbedeterminedinaccordancewiththerequirementsoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manual.DisplacementcapacitiesshallbedeterminedbytheMethodD2–StructureCapacity/Demand(Pushover)MethodofSection5.6.FormostWSDOTbridges,theseismicanalysisneedonlybeperformedfortheupperlevel(1,000yearreturnperiod)groundmotionswithalifesafetyseismicperformancelevel.
4.4.2 Seismic Retrofit DesignOnceseismicallydeficientbridgeelementshavebeenidentified,appropriateretrofitmeasuresshallbeselectedanddesigned.Table1-11,Chapters8,9,10,11,andAppendicesDthruFoftheSeismic Retrofitting Manualshallbeusedinselectinganddesigningtheseismicretrofitmeasures.TheWSDOTBridgeandStructureOfficeSeismicSpecialistwillbeconsultedintheselectionanddesignoftheretrofitmeasures.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-27 June 2017
4.4.3 Computer Analysis VerificationThecomputerresultswillbeverifiedtoensureaccuracyandcorrectness.Thedesignershouldusethefollowingproceduresformodelverification:• Usinggraphicstochecktheorientationofallnodes,members,supports,joint,andmemberreleases.Makesurethatallthestructuralcomponentsandconnectionscorrectlymodeltheactualstructure.
• Checkdeadloadreactionswithhandcalculations.Thedifferenceshouldbelessthan5percent.
• Calculatefundamentalandsubsequentmodesbyhandandcompareresultswithcomputerresults.
• Checkthemodeshapesandverifythatstructuremovementsarereasonable.• Increasethenumberofmodestoobtain90percentormoremassparticipationineachdirection.GTSTRUDL/SAP2000directlycalculatesthepercentageofmassparticipation.
• Checkthedistributionoflateralforces.Aretheyconsistentwithcolumnstiffness?Dosmallchangesinstiffnessofcertaincolumnsgivepredictableresults?
4.4.4 Earthquake RestrainersLongitudinalrestrainersshallbehighstrengthsteelrodsconformtoASTMF1554Grade105,includingSupplementRequirementsS2,S3andS5.Nuts,andcouplersifrequired,shallconformtoASTMA563GradeDH.WashersshallconformtoAASHTOM293.Highstrengthsteelrodsandassociatedcouplers,nutsandwashersshallbegalvanizedafterfabricationinaccordancewithAASHTOM232.Thelengthoflongitudinalrestrainersshallbelessthan24feet.
4.4.5 Isolation BearingsIsolationbearingsmaybeusedforseismicretrofitprojectstoreducethedemandsthroughmodificationofthedynamicpropertiesofthebridgeasaviablealternativetostrengtheningweakelementsofnon-ductilebridgesubstructuremembersofexistingbridge.UseofisolationbearingsneedstheapprovalofWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineer.IsolationbearingsshallbedesignedpertherequirementsspecifiedinSection9.3.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-28 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.5 SeismicDesignRequirementsforRetainingWalls4.5.1 General
Allretainingwallsshallincludeseismicdesignloadcombinations.ThedesignaccelerationforretainingwallsshallbedeterminedinaccordancewiththeAASHTOSEISMIC.Oncethedesignaccelerationisdetermined,thedesignershallfollowtheapplicabledesignspecificationrequirementslistedinAppendix8.1-A1:
ExceptionstothecasesdescribedinAppendix8.1-A1mayoccurwithapprovalfromtheWSDOTBridgeDesignEngineerand/ortheWSDOTGeotechnicalEngineer.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-29 June 2017
4.6 AppendicesAppendix4-B1 DesignExamplesofSeismicRetrofits
Appendix4-B2 SAP2000SeismicAnalysisExample
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-31 June 2017
Design Examples Appendix 4-B1 of Seismic Retrofits
DesignExample–RestrainerDesignFHWA-HRT-06-032Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 - Bridges,Example8.1RestrainerDesignbyIterativeMethod
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 Page 4-B1-1 July 2011
Design Examples Appendix 4-B1 of Seismic Retrofits
Design Example – Restrainer DesignFHWA-HRT-06-032 Seismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 - Bridges, Example 8.1 Restrainer Design by Iterative Method
= 12.00 '' Seat Width (inch)= 2.00 '' concrete cover on vertical faces at seat (inch)
"G" = 1.00 ''
F.S. = 0.67 safety factor against the unseating of the span
= 176.00 ksi restrainer yield stress (ksi)= 10,000 restrainer modulus of elasticity (ksi)= 18.00 ' restrainer length (ft.)= 1.00 '' restrainer slack (inch)= 5000.00 the weight of the less flexible frame (kips) (Frame 1)= 5000.00 the stiffness of the more flexible frame (kips) (Frame 2)= 2040 the stiffness of the less flexible frame (kips/in) (Frame 1)= 510 the stiffness of the more flexible frame (kips/in) (Frame 2) OK= 4.00 Target displacement ductility of the frames= 386.40 acceleration due to gravity (in/sec2)= 0.05 design spectrum damping ratio= 1.75 short period coefficient= 0.70 long period coefficient= 0.28 effective peak ground acceleration coefficient= 0.05 '' converge tolerance
Calculate the period at the end of constant design spectral acceleration plateau (sec)
= 0.7 / 1.75 = 0.4 sec
Calculate the period at beginning of constant design spectral acceleration plateau (sec)
= 0.2 * 0.4 = 0.08 sec
expansion joint gap (inch). For new structures, use maximum estimated opening.
1K
d2K
1W2W
Ncd
yFELrsD
gDSS saDS SFS
1DS 11 SFS vD sA
DS
Ds S
ST 1
so TT 2.0
tol
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-32 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
Design Examples of Seismic Retrofits Chapter 4
Page 4-B1-2 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 July 2011
Step 1: Calculate Available seat width,= 12 - 1 - 2 * 2 = 7 '' 0.67 * 7 = 4.69 ''
Step 2: Calculate Maximum Allowable Expansion Joint Displacement and compare to the available seat width.= 1 + 176 * 18 * 12 / 10000 = 4.8 '' > = 4.69 '' NG
Step 3: Compute expansion joint displacement without restrainersThe effective stiffness of each frame are modified due to yielding of frames.
= 2040 / 4 = 510 kip/in= 510 / 4 = 127.5 kip/in
The effective natural period of each frame is given by:
= 2 * PI() *( 5000 / ( 386.4 * 510) )^0.5 = 1 sec.
= 2 * PI() *( 5000 / ( 386.4 * 127.5) )^0.5 = 2 sec.
The effective damping and design spectrum correction factor is:= 0.05 + ( 1 - 0.95 /( 4 ) ^ 0.5 - 0.05 * (4 ) ^ 0.5 ) / PI() = 0.19= 1.5 / ( 40 * 0.19 + 1 ) + 0.5 = 0.68
Determine the frame displacement from Design Spectrum= 1.00 sec. = 0.699
= 2.00 sec. = 0.350
Modified displacement for damping other than 5 percent damped bridges
= ( 1 / ( 2*PI()))^2 * 0.68* 0.699 * 386.4 = 4.65 ''
= ( 2 / ( 2*PI()))^2 * 0.68* 0.35 * 386.4 = 9.3 ''
the frequency ratio of modes, = 2 / 1 = 2
The cross-correlation coefficient,
= (8 * 0.19 ^2)*(1 + 2 )*( 2 ^(3/2))/((1 - 2 ^2)^2 + 4* 0.19 ^2* 2 *(1+ 2 )^2) = 0.2
The initial relative hinge displacement
= ( 4.65 ^2 + 9.3 ^2 - 2 * 0.2 * 4.65 * 9.3 ) ^ 0.5 = 9.52 '' >=2/3 Das = 4.69 ''
Restrainers are required
The relative displacement of the two frames can be calculated using the CQC combination of the two frame displacement as given by equation (Eq. 3)
effK ,1effK ,2
asDasD
rD
effeff gK
WT,1
1,1 2
effeff gK
WT,2
2,2 2
effdc
effT ,1 )( ,1 effa TS
effT ,2 )( ,2 effa TS
gTScT
D effadeff )(
2 ,1
2,1
1
gTScT
D effadeff )(
2 ,2
2,2
2
1
2
2
1TT
122222
232
12 )1(4)1(
)1(8
eff
eff
oeqD
so
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-33 June 2017
Chapter 4 Design Examples of Seismic Retrofits
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 Page 4-B1-3 July 2011
Step 4: Estimate the Initial restrainer stiffness
= ( 510 * 127.5 ) / ( 510 + 127.5 ) = 102 kip/in
= 102 * ( 9.52 - 4.8 ) / 9.52 = 50.54 kip/in
Adjust restrainer stiffness to limit the joint displacement to a prescribed value .This can be achieve by using Goal Seek on the Tools menu.
Goal SeekSet Cell $J$104 Cell Address forTo Value
By Changing Cell $D$104 Cell address for initial guess
Apply the Goal Seek every time you use the spreadsheet and Click OK
= 193.21 kip/in (Input a value to start) = 0.00 ''
Step 5: Calculate Relative Hinge Displacement from modal analysis.
Frame 1 mass = 5000 / 386.4 = 12.94 kip. Sec2 / inFrame 2 mass = 5000 / 386.4 = 12.94 kip. Sec2 / in
= 510.00 kip/in = 127.50 kip/in
Solve the following quadratic equation for natural frequencies
= 12.94 * 12.94 = 167.44
= - 12.94 * ( 127.5 + 193.21 ) - 12.94 * ( 510 + 193.21 ) = -13249.52
= 510 * 127.5 + ( 510 + 127.5 ) * 193.21 = 188197.22
The roots of this quadratic are= (-( -13249.52) +(( -13249.52) ^2-4* 167.44 * 188197.22 )^0.5)/( 2*167.44 ) = 60.57
= (-(-13249.52-((-13249.52)^2-4*167.44*188197.22)^0.5)/(2*167.44) = 18.56
The natural frequencies are= 7.78 rad/sec = 4.31 rad/sec
The corresponding natural periods are= 0.81 sec. = 1.46 sec.
For mode 1, = 7.78 rad/sec = 60.57= 510 + 193.21 - 12.94 * 60.57 = -80.61
The relative value (modal shape) corresponding
= 193.21 / -80.61 = -2.397
It is customary to describe the normal modes by assigning a unit value to one of the amplitudes.For the first mode, set = 1.00 then = -2.40The mode shape for the first mode is
-2.401.00
1m2m
effK ,1 effK ,2
rK
0C)()( 222 ii BA
21mmA )()( ,12,21 reffreff KKmKKmB
reffeffeffeff KK(KKKC ),2,1,2,1
C
21
22
1 2
effT ,1 effT ,2
1 211,1 mKK reff
21
11
211,121
11
mKKK
reff
r
21
21
111
2T
rD
effeff
effeffeff KK
KKK
,2,1
,2,1mod
o
o
eq
reqeffr D
DDKK
)(mod
1
req DD
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-34 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
Design Examples of Seismic Retrofits Chapter 4
Page 4-B1-4 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 July 2011
For mode 2, = 4.31 rad/sec = 18.56= 510 + 193.21 - 12.94 * 18.56 = 463.11
The relative value
= 193.21 / 463.11 = 0.417
For the 2nd mode, set = 1.00 then = 2.40The mode shape for the 2nd mode is
1.002.40
Calculate the participation factor for mode " 1 "
12.94 * -2.4 + 12.94 * 1 = -18.08
= ( 510 + 193.21 ) * (-2.4) ^2 - 2* 193.21 * -2.4 * 1 + ( 127.5 + 193.21 ) * ( 1 ) ^2 = 5286.98
1 - -2.4 = 3.4
-18.08 / 5286.98 * 3.4 = -0.0116 sec.2
Calculate the participation factor for mode " 2 "
12.94 * 1 + 12.94 * 2.4 = 43.96
= ( 510 + 193.21 ) * (1) ^2 - 2* 193.21 * 1 * 2.4 + ( 127.5 + 193.21 ) * ( 2.4 ) ^2 = 1619.53
2.4 - 1 = 1.4
43.96 / 1619.53 * 1.4 = 0.0379 sec.2
Determine the frame displacement from Design Spectrum= 0.81 sec. = 0.867
= 1.46 sec. = 0.480
2 222
21,1 mKK reff
221,122
12
mKKK
reff
r
12 22
22
122
}){}({}]{[}{}1]{[}{
111
11
TT
Ta
KMP
}1]{[}{ 1 MT 212111 mm
}{}{ 1Ta 1121
1P
}){}({}]{[}{
}1]{[}{2
22
22
TT
Ta
KMP
}1]{[}{ 2 MT
}{}{ 2Ta 1222
2P
effT ,1 )( ,1 effa TS
effT ,2 )( ,2 effa TS
222121 mm
221,22111
211,111 )(2)(}]{[}{ reffrreff
T KKKKKK
222,22212
212,112 )(2)(}]{[}{ reffrreff
T KKKKKK
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-35 June 2017
Chapter 4 Design Examples of Seismic Retrofits
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.06 Page 4-B1-5 July 2011
Calculate new relative displacement at expansion joint
-0.0116 * 0.68 * 0.867 * 386.4 = -2.64 ''
0.0379 * 0.68 * 0.48 * 386.4 = 4.77 ''
The effective period ratio
= 1.46 / 0.81 = 1.81
The cross-correlation coefficient,= (8 * 0.19 ^2)*(1+ 1.81 )*( 1.81 ^(3/2))/((1 -1.81 ^2)^2+4* 0.19 ^2* 1.81 *(1+1.81 )^2) = 0.26
= ( ( -2.64)^2 + ( 4.77)^2+2* 0.26 * ( -2.64 ) * (4.77))^0.5 = 4.8 ''>4.8 ''
= 4.8 - 4.8 = 0 ''
OK Go to Step 7 and calculate the number of restrainers
Step 7: Calculate number of restrainers
= 4.80 '' = 193.21 kip/in = 176.00 ksi= 0.222 in^2
= ( 193.21 * 4.8 ) / ( 176 * 0.222 ) = 23.74 restrainers
eff
eff
TT
,1
,2
2
1
2eqD gTScP effad )05.0,( ,22
12
1eqD
gTScPD effadeq )05.0,( ,111
ry
rrr AF
DKN
rD rK yFrA
rN
req DD
Page 4-36 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-1
August 2010
SAP2000 Seismic Appendix 4-B2 Analysis Example
1. IntroductionThisexampleservestoillustratetheprocedureusedtoperformnonlinearstatic“pushover”analysisinboththelongitudinalandtransversedirections inaccordancewiththeAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design usingSAP2000. Afullmodelofthebridgeisusedtocomputethedisplacementdemandfromaresponse-spectrumanalysis. Toperformthepushoveranalysisinthelongitudinaldirection,theentirebridgeis pushedinordertoincludetheframeactionofthesuperstructureandadjacentbents. Toperformthepushoveranalysisinthetransversedirection,a bentisisolatedusingtheSAP2000“stagedconstruction”feature. Theexamplebridgeissymmetric andhasthreespans. ItisassumedthereaderhassomepreviousknowledgeofhowtouseSAP2000. ThisexamplewascreatedusingSAP2000version14.2.0.
Note: Byproducingthisexample,theWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationdoesnotwarrantthatthe SAP2000softwaredoesnotincludeerrors. TheexampledoesnotrelieveDesignEngineersoftheirprofessionalresponsibilityforthesoftware’s accuracy andisnotintendedtodoso. Design Engineers shouldverifyallcomputerresultswithhandcalculations.
Brief Table of Contents of Example:
1. Introduction..............................................................................................................................1
2. ModelSetup .............................................................................................................................22.1 OverviewofModel ....................................................................................................22.2 FoundationsModeling ...............................................................................................32.3 MaterialsModeling ....................................................................................................62.4 ColumnModeling ......................................................................................................152.5 CrossbeamModeling .................................................................................................192.6 SuperstructureModeling............................................................................................202.7 GravityLoad Patterns ................................................................................................22
3. DisplacementDemandAnalysis ..............................................................................................233.1 ModalAnalysis ..........................................................................................................233.2 Response-SpectrumAnalysis.....................................................................................273.3 DisplacementDemand ...............................................................................................32
4. DisplacementCapacityAnalysis .............................................................................................344.1 HingeDefinitionsandAssignments ..........................................................................344.2 PushoverAnalysis......................................................................................................41
5. CodeRequirements ..................................................................................................................665.1 P-Δ Capacity Requirement Check .............................................................................665.2 MinimumLateralStrengthCheck .............................................................................675.3 StructureDisplacementDemand/CapacityCheck.....................................................695.4 MemberDuctilityRequirementCheck ......................................................................735.5 ColumnShearDemand/CapacityCheck ...................................................................795.6 BalancedStiffnessandFrameGeometryRequirementCheck ..................................83
Appendix 4-B2 SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-37 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-2 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
2. ModelSetup2.1 OverviewofModelThisexampleemploysSAP2000. Thesuperstructureismodeledusingframe elementsforeachofthegirdersandshellelementsforthedeck. Shellelementsarealsousedtomodeltheend,intermediate, andpierdiaphragms. Non-prismaticframesectionsareusedtomodelthecrossbeamssincetheyhavevariabledepth. TheX-axisisalongthebridge’s longitudinalaxis andtheZ-axisisvertical. TheunitsusedforinputsintoSAP2000throughoutthisexamplearekip-in.Thefollowingsummarizesthebridgebeingmodeled:
• Allspansare145’inlength• (5)linesofprestressedconcretegirders(WF74G)with9’-6”ctcspacing• 8”deckwith46’-11”towidth• Girdersarecontinuousandfixedtothecrossbeamsattheintermediatepiers• (2)5’diametercolumnsatbents• Combinedspreadfootings– 20’Lx40’W x5’Dateachbent• Abutmentlongitudinalisfree,transverseisfixed
Figure2.1-1showsaviewofthemodelinSAP2000.
Wireframe3-DViewof ModelFigure 2.1-1
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-38 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-3August 2010
2.2 FoundationsModeling2.2.1 IntermediatePiers
Eachbentissupportedbyacombinedspreadfootingthatis20’Lx40’Wx5’D. Thesefootingsaremodeledusingsprings. RigidlinksconnectthebasesofthecolumnstoacenterjointthatthespringpropertiesareassignedtoasshowninFigure2.2.1-1.
Wireframe2-DViewofBentFigure 2.2.1-1
ThesoilspringsweregeneratedusingthemethodforspreadfootingsoutlinedinChapter7oftheWashington State Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual. TheassumedsoilparameterswereG=1,700 ksf and ν = 0.35. Thespringvaluesusedinthemodelforthespreadfootingsare showninTable2.2.1-1.
DegreeofFreedom StiffnessValueUX 18,810 kip/inUY 16,820 kip/inUZ 18,000 kip/inRX 1,030,000,000 kip-in/radRY 417,100,000 kip-in/radRZ 1,178,000,000 kip-in/rad
JointSpringValuesforSpreadFootingsTable 2.2.1-1
Figure2.2.1-2 showsthespreadfootingjointspringassignments (Assign menu > Joint > Springs).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-39 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-4 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
SpreadFootingJointSpring AssignmentsFigure 2.2.1-2
Thespringsusedinthedemandmodel(response-spectrummodel)arethesameasthespringsusedinthecapacitymodel(pushovermodel). It is alsobeacceptabletoconservativelyusefixed-basecolumnsforthecapacitymodel.
2.2.2 Abutments
ThesuperstructureismodeledasbeingfreeinthelongitudinaldirectionattheabutmentsinaccordancewiththepoliciesoutlinedintheWashington State Department of Transportation Bridge Design Manual. Theabutmentsarefixedinthetransversedirection inthisexampleforsimplification. However,pleasenotethattheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design requirethestiffnessofthetransverseabutments bemodeled. Sincethere arefivegirderlinesinsteadofaspineelement,thejointsattheendsofthegirdersattheabutmentsallhavejointrestraintsassignedtothem. ThegirderjointrestraintassignmentsattheabutmentsarelistedinTable2.2.2-1.
DegreeofFreedom FixityUX FreeUY FixedUZ FixedRX FreeRY FreeRZ Free
JointFixityforGirderJointsatAbutmentsTable 2.2.2-1
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-40 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-5August 2010
Figure2.2.2-1showsthegirderjointrestraintsattheabutments(Assign menu > Joint > Restraints).
GirderJointRestraint AssignmentsatAbutmentsFigure 2.2.2-1
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-41 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-6 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
2.3 MaterialsModelingSAP2000’s defaultconcretematerialpropertieshaveelasticmodulibasedonconcretedensitiesof144psf. TheelasticmodulioftheconcretematerialsusedinthisexamplearebasedontheWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation’spolicyonconcretedensities tobeusedinthecalculations ofelasticmoduli. PleaseseethecurrentWSDOT Bridge Design Manual andBridge Design Memorandums. In Version14 ofSAP2000,nonlinearmaterialpropertiesforCaltranssectionsarenolongerdefinedinSectionDesigner andarenowdefinedinthematerialdefinitionsthemselves. Table2.3-1 lists the materialdefinitionsusedinthemodelandtheelementstheyareappliedto (Define menu > Materials).
MaterialName MaterialType SectionPropertyUsedFor
MaterialUnitWeight(pcf)ForDeadLoad
ForModulusofElasticity
4000Psi-Deck Concrete Deck 155 150
4000Psi-Other Concrete Crossbeams&Diaphragms 150 145
5200Psi-Column Concrete Columns 150 1457000Psi-Girder Concrete Girders 165 155
A706-Other Rebar RebarOtherThanColumns 490 -
A706-Column Rebar ColumnRebar 490 -
MaterialPropertiesUsedinModelTable 2.3-1
The“5200Psi-Column”and“A706-Column” materialdefinitionsarecreatedtodefinetheexpected,nonlinearpropertiesofthecolumnsection.
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“4000Psi-Deck” isshowninFigure2.3-1 (Define menu > Materials > select 4000Psi-Deck > click Modify/Show Material button).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-42 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-7August 2010
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“4000Psi-Deck”Figure 2.3-1
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“4000Psi-Other”isshowninFigure2.3-2(Define menu > Materials > select 4000Psi-Other > click Modify/Show Material button).
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“4000Psi-Other”Figure 2.3-2
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-43 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-8 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“7000Psi-Girder” isshowninFigure2.3-3 (Define menu > Materials > select 7000Psi-Girder > click Modify/Show Material button).
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial “7000Psi-Girder”Figure 2.3-3
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-44 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-9August 2010
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“5200Psi-Column” isshownFigure2.3-4 (Define menu > Materials > select 5200Psi-Column > click Modify/Show Material button).
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“5200Psi-Column”Figure 2.3-4
WhentheSwitch To Advanced Property Display boxshowninFigure2.3-4 ischecked , thewindowshowninFigure2.3-5 opens.
AdvancedMaterialPropertyOptionsforMaterial“5200Psi-Column”Figure 2.3-5
ByclickingtheModify/Show Material Properties buttoninFigure2.3-5, thewindowshowninFigure2.3-6 opens.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-45 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-10 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
AdvancedMaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“5200Psi-Column”Figure 2.3-6
ByclickingtheNonlinear Material Data buttoninFigure2.3-6, thewindowshowninFigure2.3-7 opens.
NonlinearMaterialDataforMaterial“5200Psi-Column”Figure 2.3-7
NotethatinFigure2.3-7 theStrain At Unconfined Compressive Strength, f’c andtheUltimate Unconfined Strain Capacity aresettothevaluesrequiredinSection8.4.4oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. TheseunconfinedpropertiesareparametersusedindefiningtheManderconfinedconcretestress-straincurveofthecolumncore. Itisseen
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-46 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-11August 2010
thatundertheStress-Strain Definition Options, Mander isselected. ByclickingtheShowStress-Strain Plot buttoninFigure2.3-7, a plotsimilartothatshownFigure2.3-8 isdisplayed.
Material Stress-StrainCurvePlotforMaterial“5200Psi-Column”Figure 2.3-8
Figure2.3-8 showsboththeconfinedandunconfinednonlinearstress-strainrelationships. Theusershouldverifythattheconcretestress-straincurvesareasexpected.
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“A706-Other”isshowninFigure2.3-9 (Define menu > Materials > select A706-Other > click Modify/Show Material button).
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-12 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“A706-Other”Figure 2.3-9
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“A706-Column” isshowninFigure2.3-10(Define menu > Materials > select A706-Column > click Modify/Show Material button).
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“A706-Column”Figure 2.3-10
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-47 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-12 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“A706-Other”Figure 2.3-9
TheMaterialPropertyDataforthematerial“A706-Column” isshowninFigure2.3-10(Define menu > Materials > select A706-Column > click Modify/Show Material button).
MaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“A706-Column”Figure 2.3-10
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-48 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-13August 2010
WhentheSwitch To Advanced Property Display boxinFigure2.3-10 ischecked, thewindowshowninFigure2.3-11 opens.
AdvancedMaterialPropertyOptionsforMaterial “A706-Column”Figure 2.3-11
ByclickingtheModify/Show Material Properties button inFigure2.3-11, thewindowshowninFigure2.3-12 opens.
AdvancedMaterialPropertyDataforMaterial“A706-Column”Figure 2.3-12
InFigure2.3-12, theMinimum Yield Stress, Fy = 68 ksiandtheMinimum Tensile Stress,Fu = 95 ksiasrequiredperTable8.4.2-1oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. SAP2000usesFy andFu insteadofFye andFue togeneratethenonlinearstress-strain curve. Therefore,theFye andFue inputsinSAP2000donotserveapurposeforthisanalysis. ByclickingtheNonlinear Material Data buttoninFigure2.3-12,thewindowshowninFigure2.3-13 opens.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-49 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-14 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
NonlinearMaterialDataforMaterial“A706-Column”Figure 2.3-13
InFigure2.3-13,itisseenthatundertheStress-Strain Curve Definitions Options, Park isselected. AlsotheboxforUse Caltrans Default Controlling Strain Values ischecked. ByclickingtheShow Stress-Strain Plot buttoninFigure2.3-13 theplot showninFigure2.3-14 isdisplayed.
Material Stress-StrainCurvePlotforMaterial“A706-Column”Figure 2.3-14
InFigure2.3-14, the strain at which the stress begins to decrease is εRsu,whichtheusershouldverifyforcorrectness.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-50 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-15August 2010
2.4 ColumnModelingThereare twocolumnsateachbent. Thecolumns arefivefeetindiameterandhave(24)#10barsforlongitudinalsteel,which amountstoasteel-concretearearatioofabout1%. Inthehingezones,thecolumnshaveconfinementsteelconsistingof#6spiralbarswitha3.5 inchspacing.
Thecolumnelementshaverigidendoffsetsassignedtothematthefootingsandcrossbeams.Thenetclearheightofthecolumnsis29’-2”. Thecolumnsaresplitintothreeframeelements.Section5.4.3oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design requiresthatcolumnsbesplitintoaminimumofthreeelements.
Figure2.4-1showstheframesectionpropertydefinitionforthecolumnelements(Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show Property button).
FrameSectionPropertyDefinitionfor FrameSection“COL”Figure 2.4-1
ByclickingtheSection Designer buttoninFigure2.4-1,thewindowshowninFigure2.4-2opens. The“COL” framesectionis definedusingaroundCaltransshapeinSectionDesigner asshowninFigure2.4-2.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-51 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-16 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
SectionDesignerViewofFrameSection“COL”Figure 2.4-2
Byright-clickingonthesectionshowninFigure2.4-2,thewindowshownin Figure2.4-3opens.Figure2.4-3showstheparameterinputwindowfortheCaltransshapeisshowninFigure2.4-2.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-52 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-17August 2010
CaltransSectionPropertiesforFrameSection “COL”Figure 2.4-3
ByclickingtheShow buttonfortheCore Concrete inFigure2.4-3,thewindowshowninFigure2.4-4 opens.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-53 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-18 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ConcreteModelforCoreofFrameSection“COL”Figure 2.4-4
Figure2.4-4 showstheManderconfinedstress-strainconcretemodelforthecore ofthecolumn.Theusershouldverifythattheconcretestress-straincurveisasexpected.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-54 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-19August 2010
2.5 Crossbeam ModelingThecrossbeams are modeledasframeelementswithnon-prismaticsectionpropertiesduetothevariabledepthofthe sections (Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections). Thecrossbeamelementshavetheirinsertionpointssettothetopcenter (Assign menu > Frame > Insertion Point). Thepierdiaphragmabovethecrossbeamismodeledwithshellelements. Anextruded viewofthebentisshowninFigure2.5-1.
Extruded2-DViewofBentFigure 2.5-1
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-55 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-19August 2010
2.5 Crossbeam ModelingThecrossbeams are modeledasframeelementswithnon-prismaticsectionpropertiesduetothevariabledepthofthe sections (Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections). Thecrossbeamelementshavetheirinsertionpointssettothetopcenter (Assign menu > Frame > Insertion Point). Thepierdiaphragmabovethecrossbeamismodeledwithshellelements. Anextruded viewofthebentisshowninFigure2.5-1.
Extruded2-DViewofBentFigure 2.5-1
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-20 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
2.6 Superstructure ModelingThegirdersareWashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportationWF74Gs. Theframesectiondefinitionforsection“WF74G”isshowninFigure2.6-1 (Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select WF74G > click Modify/Show Property button).
FrameSectionParameterInputforFrameSection“WF74G”Figure 2.6-1
Thegirdersareassignedinsertionpointssuchthattheyconnect tothesamejointsasthedeckelementsbutarebelowthedeck. Sincethedeckis8 inches thickandthegapbetweenthetopofthegirderandthesoffitofthedeckis3 inches,theinsertionpointis7 inches (8 in./2+3 in.)abovethetopofthegirder. Figure2.6-2showsthegirderframeelementinsertionpointassignments(Assign menu > Frame > Insertion Point).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-56 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-21August 2010
GirderFrameElementInsertionPointAssignmentsFigure 2.6-2
Linksconnectthegirderstothecrossbeamswhichmodelsthefixedconnectionbetweentheseelements. SeethescreenshotshowninFigure2.6-3.
Wireframe3-DViewofBentandSuperstructureIntersectionFigure 2.6-3
The superstructureisbrokenintofivesegments perspan. Section5.4.3oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design requiresthataminimumoffoursegments perspanbeused.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-57 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-22 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
2.7 GravityLoadPatternsTherearethree deadloadpatternsinthemodel: “DC-Structure”, “DC-Barriers”, and“DW-Overlay”. The“DC-Structure” caseincludestheselfweightofthestructuralcomponents. The“DC-Barriers” caseincludesthedeadloadofthebarriers,whichisappliedasanarealoadtotheoutermostdeckshells. The“DW-Overlay” caseincludesthefutureoverlayloadsappliedtothedeckshells. Thedead loadpatterndefinitionsareshownFigure2.7-1 (Define menu > Load Patterns).
Dead LoadPatternDefinitionsFigure 2.7-1
Thedesignershouldverifytheweightofthestructureinthemodelwithhandcalculations.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-58 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-23August 2010
3. DisplacementDemandAnalysis3.1 ModalAnalysis3.1.1 MassSource
Allofthedeadloadsare consideredascontributingmassforthemodalload case. AdisplayofthemasssourcedefinitionwindowfromSAP2000isshowninFigure3.1.1-1 (Define menu > Mass Source).
MassSourceDefinitionFigure 3.1.1-1
3.1.2 CrackingofColumns
Section5.6oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design providesdiagramsthatcanbeusedtodeterminethecrackedsectionpropertiesofthecolumns. However,SAP2000’sSectionDesignercanbeusedtocomputetheeffectivesectionproperties. IfusingSectionDesigner,thedesignershouldverifythatthemethodofcalculationconformstoAASHTO Guide Specifications of LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. Thecolumnaxialdeadloadatmid-heightisapproximately 1,250 kips without includingtheeffectsofthe constructionstaging. Forthebridgeinthisexample,theinclusionofstagingeffectswouldcausetheaxialloadinthecolumnstovarybylessthantenpercent. Suchasmallchangeinaxialloadwouldnotsignificantlyaltertheresultsofthisanalysis. However,therearesituationswheretheinclusionofconstructionsequence effectswillsignificantlyaltertheanalysis. Therefore,engineeringjudgmentshouldbeusedwhendecidedwhetherornottoincludetheeffectsofstaging. ByhavingSectionDesignerperformamoment-curvatureanalysisonthecolumnsectionwithanaxialloadof1,250 kips,itisfoundthatICrack=212,907 inch4. Thegrossmomentofinertiais628,044 inch4 (ascalculatedbySAP2000). Therefore,theratiois212,907/628,044 = 0.34. Themoment-curvatureanalysisisshowninFigure3.1.2-1 (Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show Property button > click Section Designer button > Display menu > Show Moment-Curvature Curve).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-59 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-24 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
MomentCurvatureCurveforFrameSection“COL”atP=-1250 kipsFigure 3.1.2-1
ItcanbeseeninFigure3.1.2-1thatconcretestraincapacitylimitstheavailableplasticcurvature.DesignersshouldverifythatSAP2000’sbilinearizationisacceptable. ThepropertymodifiersarethenappliedtothecolumnframeelementsasshowninFigure3.1.2-2 (Assign menu > Frame > Property Modifiers).
FramePropertyModificationFactorforColumnFrame ElementsFigure 3.1.2-2
Thetorsionalconstantmodifieris0.2forcolumnsasrequiredbySection5.6.5oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-60 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-25August 2010
3.1.3 LoadCaseSetup
The“MODAL” load caseusesRitzvectorsandisdefinedinSAP2000asshowninFigure3.1.3-1 (Define menu > Load Cases > select MODAL > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“MODAL”Figure 3.1.3-1
3.1.4 Verificationof MassParticipation
Section5.4.3oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design requires aminimumof90%massparticipationinbothdirections. Forthisexample,themassisconsideredtobethesameinbothdirectionseventhoughtheenddiaphragmsarefreeinthelongitudinaldirectionandrestrained inthetransversedirection. BydisplayingtheModal Participating Mass Ratios tableforthe“MODAL”loadcaseitisfoundthattheX-direction(longitudinal)reachesgreaterthan90%massparticipationonthefirstmodeshape,whiletheY-direction(transverse)reachesgreaterthan90%massparticipationbythe seventeenthmodeshape. Thisimpliesthattheminimumcoderequirementscouldbemetbyincludingonlyseventeenmodeshapes.TheModal Participating Mass Ratios tableisshowninFigure3.1.4-1 (Display menu > Show Tables > check Modal Participating Mass Ratios > click OK button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-61 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-26 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ModalParticipatingMassRatiosforLoadCase“MODAL”Figure 3.1.4-1
Figure3.1.4-1alsoshowsthatthefirstmodeintheX-direction(longitudinal)hasaperiodof0.95 secondsandthefirstmodeintheY-direction(transverse)hasperiodof0.61 seconds. Thedesignershouldverifyfundamentalperiodswithhandcalculations. Thedesignershouldalsovisuallyreviewtheprimarymodeshapestoverifytheyrepresentrealisticbehavior.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-62 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-27August 2010
3.2 Response-SpectrumAnalysis3.2.1 SeismicHazard
ThebridgeislocatedinRedmond,Wash. Themappedspectralaccelerationcoefficientsare:
PGA=0.396gSs =0.883gS1 =0.294g
AsiteclassofE isassumedforthisexampleandthesitecoefficientsare:
FPGA = 0.91Fa = 1.04Fv = 2.82
Therefore,theresponse-spectrumisgeneratedusingthefollowingparameters:
As =FPGA*PGA=0.361 gSDS =Fa*Ss = 0.919 gSD1 =Fv*S1 = 0.830 g
SinceSD1 isgreaterthanor equalto0.50,perTable3.5-1oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design theSeismicDesignCategoryisD.
3.2.2 Response-SpectrumInput
ThespectrumisdefinedfromafilecreatedusingtheAASHTOEarthquakeGroundMotionParameterstool. Ascreenshotoftheresponse-spectrumas inputted inSAP2000isshowninFigure3.2.2-1 (Define menu > Functions > Response Spectrum > select SC-E > click ShowSpectrum button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-63 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-28 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ResponseSpectrumFunctionDefinitionfromFileforFunction“SC-E”Figure 3.2.2-1
WhentheConvert to User Defined buttonisclicked,thefunctionappearsasshowninFigure3.2.2-2.
ResponseSpectrumFunctionDefinition forFunction“SC-E”Figure 3.2.2-2
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-64 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-29August 2010
Havingtheresponse-spectrumfunctionstoredas“UserDefined”isadvantageousbecausethedataisstoredwithinthe.SDBfile. Therefore,ifthe.SDBfileistransferredtoadifferentlocation(differentcomputer),theresponse-spectrumfunctionwillalsobemoved.
3.2.3 LoadCaseSetup
Tworesponse-spectrumanalysiscasesaresetupinSAP2000: oneforeachorthogonaldirection.
3.2.3.1 LongitudinalDirection
Theload casedata fortheX-directionisshowninFigure3.2.3.1-1 (Define menu > Load Cases > select EX > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“EX”Figure 3.2.3.1-1
3.2.3.2 Transverse Direction
TheloadcasedatafortheY-directionisshownFigure3.2.3.2-1 (Define menu > Load Cases > select EY > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-65 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-30 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
LoadCaseDataforLoad Case “EY”Figure 3.2.3.2-1
3.2.4 Response-SpectrumDisplacements
ThecolumndisplacementsinthisexamplearetrackedatJoint33,whichislocatedatthetopofacolumn. Sincethebridgeissymmetric,allofthecolumnshavethesamedisplacementsin theresponse-spectrumanalyses.
3.2.4.1 LongitudinalDirection
Thehorizontaldisplacementsatthetops ofthecolumns fromtheEXanalysiscaseareU1=7.48inches andU2 = 0.00 inches. ThisisshowninFigure3.2.4.1-1 asdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Deformed Shape > select EX > click OK button).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-66 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-31August 2010
JointDisplacementatJoint33forLoadCase“EX”Figure 3.2.4.1-1
3.2.4.2 Transverse Direction
Thehorizontaldisplacementsatthetops ofthecolumns fromtheEYanalysiscaseareU1=0.17inches andU2=3.55 inches. ThisisshowninFigure3.2.4.2-1 asdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Deformed Shape > select EY > click OK button).
JointDisplacementatJoint33forLoadCase“EY”Figure 3.2.4.2-1
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-67 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-32 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
3.3 DisplacementDemand3.3.1 DisplacementMagnification
DisplacementmagnificationmustbeperformedinaccordancewithSection4.3.3oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design.
ComputeTs andT*:
Ts = SD1 /SDS= 0.830 / 0.919= 0.903 sec.
T* = 1.25 Ts= 1.25 * 0.903= 1.13 sec.
3.3.1.1 LongitudinalDirection
ComputemagnificationfortheX-direction (Longitudinal):
TLong = 0.95 sec. (seesection3.1.4)
T* /TLong = 1.13 / 0.95= 1.19 >1.0=>Magnificationisrequired
Rd_Long = (1 – 1/μD)*(T* / T) + 1 / μD= (1 – 1/6)*(1.19)+1/6 (Assume μD =6)= 1.16
3.3.1.2 Transverse Direction
ComputemagnificationfortheY-direction (Transverse):
TTrans = 0.61 sec. (seesection3.1.4)
T*/TTrans = 1.13 /0.61= 1.85 >1.0=>Magnificationisrequired
Rd_Trans = (1 – 1/μD) * (T* / T) + 1 / μD= (1 – 1/6)*(1.85)+1/6 (Assume μD =6)= 1.71
3.3.2ColumnDisplacementDemand
Section4.4oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design requiresthat100%plus30%ofthedisplacementsfromeachorthogonalseismicloadcasebecombinedtodeterminethedisplacementdemands.ThedisplacementsaretrackedasJoint33,whichislocatedatthetopofacolumn.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-68 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-33August 2010
3.3.1.1 LongitudinalDirection
FortheX-direction(100EX+30EY):
UX(duetoEX)=7.48in.
UX(duetoEY)=0.17in.
Therefore,
ΔLD_Long = 1.0 * Rd_Long * 7.48+0.3 * Rd_Trans * 0.17
= 1.0*1.16*7.48+0.3*1.71*0.17=8.76in. =>ThisisthedisplacementdemandfortheX-Dir
3.3.1.2 TransverseDirection
FortheY-direction(100EY+30EX):
UY(duetoEY)=3.55in.
UY(duetoEX)=0.00in.
Therefore,
ΔLD_Trans = 1.0 * Rd_Trans * 3.55+0.3*Rd_Long * 0.00
= 1.0 * 1.71 * 3.55 +0.3*1.16*0.00=6.07in.=>ThisistheDisplacementDemandfortheY-Dir
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-69 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-34 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
4. DisplacementCapacityAnalysis4.1 PlasticHingeDefinitionsandAssignments4.1.1 ColumnInflectionPoints
Thetopsand bottomsofallcolumnshaveenoughmomentfixityinalldirectionstocauseplastichinging,whichmeansthecolumnswillexhibitbehaviorsimilartoafixed-fixedcolumn. Theplasticmomentcapacitiesofthecolumnsunderdeadloadswillbeusedtoapproximatethelocationofthecolumninflectionpoints. Therefore,theaxialloads(duetodeadload)atthetopandbottomofthecolumnsmustbedetermined. Duetothesymmetryofthebridgeinthisexample,theaxialloadsarethesameforallofthecolumns,whichwillnotbetrueformostbridges. Figure4.1.1-1showstheaxialforcediagramfortheDC+DWloadcaseasdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Forces/Stresses > Frames/Cables > select DC+DW > select Axial Force > click OK button).
FrameAxialForceDiagramforLoadCase“DC+DW”Figure 4.1.1-1
FromtheaxialloadsdisplayedfortheDC+DWloadcaseitisdeterminedthattheaxialforceatthebottomofthecolumnisapproximately1,290 kipsandtheaxialforceatthetopofthecolumnisapproximately1,210 kips(seesection3.1.2ofthisexampleforadiscussionontheinclusionofconstructionsequenceeffectsoncolumnaxialloads). Itisexpectedthatthe differenceinaxialloadbetweenthetopsandbottomsofthecolumnswillnotresultinasignificantdifferenceintheplasticmoment. However,onsomebridgestheaxialloads atthetopsandbottomsofthecolumnsmaybesubstantiallydifferentorthecolumnsectionmayvaryalongitsheightproducingsignificantlydifferentplasticmomentsateachend.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-70 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-35August 2010
Themoment-curvatureanalysisofthecolumnbaseisshowninFigure4.1.1-2(Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show Property button >click Section Designer button > Display menu > Show Moment-Curvature Curve).
MomentCurvatureCurveforFrameSection“COL”atP=-1290 kipsFigure 4.1.1-2
ItisseeninFigure4.1.1-2thattheplasticmomentcapacityatthebaseofthecolumnis79,186kip-inches (withonlydeadloadapplied).
Themoment-curvatureanalysisofthecolumntopisshowninFigure4.1.1-3(Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show Property button >click Section Designer button > Display menu > Show Moment-Curvature Curve).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-71 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-36 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
MomentCurvatureCurveforFrameSection“COL”atP=-1210 kipsFigure 4.1.1-3
ItisseeninFigure4.1.1-3thattheplasticmomentcapacityatthetop ofthecolumnis77,920kip-inches (withonlydeadloadapplied).
Theclearheightofthecolumnsis350 inches;therefore:
L1 = Lengthfrompointofmaximummomentatbaseofcolumntoinflectionpoint(in.)= 350 xMp_col_base /(Mp_col_base +Mp_col_top)= 350x79186 /(79186 +77920)= 176 in.
L2 = Lengthfrompointofmaximummomentattopofcolumntoinflectionpoint(in.)= 350 – L1= 350 – 176= 174 in.
4.1.2 PlasticHingeLengths
Theplastichingelengthsmustbecomputedatboththetopsandbottomsofthecolumnsusingtheequations inSection4.11.6oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. Thehingelengthiscomputedasfollows:
Lp =0.08L+0.15fyedbl ≥ 0.3fyedbl
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-72 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-37August 2010
Where:L = lengthofcolumnfrompointofmaximummomenttothepointof moment
contraflexure(in.)= L1 atthebaseofthecolumns(L1Long = L1Trans = 176 in.)= L2 atthetopofthecolumns(L2Long = L2Trans = 174 in.)
fye = expectedyieldstrengthoflongitudinalcolumnreinforcingsteelbars(ksi)= 68ksi(ASTMA706bars).
dbl = nominaldiameteroflongitudinalcolumnreinforcingsteelbars(in.)= 1.27 in. (#10 bars)
Lp1 = Plastichingelengthatbaseofcolumn= 0.08*176 +0.15*68*1.27 ≥ 0.3*68*1.27= 27.03 ≥ 25.91= 27.0 in.
Lp2 = Plastichingelengthattopofcolumn= 0.08*174 +0.15*68*1.27≥ 0.3*68*1.27= 26.87 ≥ 25.91= 26.9 in.
Inthisexample, theplastichingelengthsinbothdirections are thesamebecause thelocationsoftheinflectionpointsinboth directionsarethesame. Thiswillnotalwaysbethecase,suchaswhenthereisasinglecolumnbent.
4.1.3 AssignPlasticHinges
Inordertoassigntheplastichingestothecolumnelements, therelativelocationsoftheplastichingesalongthecolumnframeelementsmustbecomputed.
Forthebases ofthecolumns:
RelativeLength= [FootingOffset+(HingeLength/2)]/ElementLength= [30+(27.0 /2)]/146= 0.30
Forthetops ofthecolumns:
RelativeLength= [ElementLength– XbeamOffset– (HingeLength/2)]/ElementLength= [146– 58 – (26.9 / 2)]/146= 0.51
ThehingesatthebasesofthecolumnsareassignedatrelativedistancesasshowninFigure4.1.3-1(Assign menu > Frame > Hinges).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-73 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-38 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
FrameHingeAssignmentsforColumnBasesFigure 4.1.3-1
ByselectingtheAuto P-M3 HingePropertyinFigure4.1.3-1 andclickingtheModify/Show Auto Hinge Assignment Data button,thewindowshowninFigure4.1.3-2opens. Figure4.1.3-2 showstheAuto Hinge Assignment Data formwithinputparametersforthehingesatthebasesofthecolumnsinthelongitudinaldirection. Duetotheorientationoftheframeelementlocalaxes,theP-M3hingeactsinthelongitudinaldirection.
AutoHingeAssignmentDataforColumnBasesinLongitudinalDirectionFigure 4.1.3-2
ByselectingtheAuto P-M2 HingePropertyinFigure4.1.3-1 andclickingtheModify/Show Hinge Assignment Data buttoninFigure4.1.3-1,thewindowshowninFigure4.1.3-3opens.Figure4.1.3-3showsthe Auto Hinge Assignment Data form withinputparametersforthehingesatthebases ofthecolumnsinthetransversedirection. Duetotheorientationoftheframeelementlocalaxes,theP-M2hingeactsinthetransversedirection.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-74 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-39August 2010
AutoHingeAssignmentDataforColumnBasesinTransverseDirectionFigure 4.1.3-3
InFigures4.1.3-2and4.1.3-3itisseenthattheHinge Length issetto27.0 inches,theUse Idealized (Bilinear) Moment-Curvature Curve boxischecked,andtheDrops Load After Point E optionisselected.
ThehingesatthetopsofthecolumnsareassignedatrelativedistancesasshowninFigure4.1.3-4(Assign menu > Frame > Hinges).
FrameHingeAssignmentsforColumnTopsFigure 4.1.3-4
ByselectingtheAuto P-M3 HingeProperty inFigure4.1.3-4 andclickingtheModify/Show Auto Hinge Assignment Data button,thewindowshowninFigure4.1.3-5opens. Figure4.1.3-5showstheAuto Hinge Assignment Data formwithinputparametersforthehingesatthetopsofthecolumnsinthelongitudinaldirection. Duetotheorientationoftheframeelementlocalaxes,theP-M3hingeactsinthelongitudinaldirection.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-75 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-40 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
AutoHingeAssignmentDataforColumnTopsinLongitudinalDirectionFigure 4.1.3-5
ByselectingtheAuto P-M2 HingePropertyinFigure4.1.3-4 andclickingtheModify/Show Hinge Assignment Data button,thewindowshowninFigure4.1.3-6opens. Figure4.1.3-6showstheAuto Hinge Assignment Data formwithinputparametersforthehingesatthetopsofthecolumnsinthetransversedirection. Duetotheorientationoftheframeelementlocalaxes,theP-M2hingeactsinthetransversedirection.
AutoHingeAssignmentDataforColumnTopsinTransverseDirectionFigure 4.1.3-6
InFigures4.1.3-5and4.1.3-6itisseenthattheHinge Length issetto26.9 inches,theUse Idealized (Bilinear) Moment-Curvature Curve boxischecked,andtheDrops Load After Point E optionisselected.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-76 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-41August 2010
4.2 PushoverAnalysis4.2.1 LateralLoadDistributions
4.2.1.1 LongitudinalDirection
Thelateralloaddistributionusedinthisexampleforthepushoveranalysisinthelongitudinaldirectionisadirecthorizontalaccelerationonthestructuremass. Also,thedeadloadcanbeappliedaspreviouslydefinedsincetheentirestructureispresentduringthepushoveranalysis. Itshouldbenotedthatalateralloaddistributionproportionaltothefundamentalmodeshapeinthelongitudinaldirectionisalsoacceptableprovidedthatatleast75%ofthestructuremassparticipatesinthemode. ThisrecommendationisderivedfromprovisionsinFEMA 356:Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
4.2.1.2 TransverseDirection
Thelateralloaddistributionusedinthisexampleforthepushoveranalysisin thetransversedirection consistsofahorizontalloadappliedattheequivalentofthecentroidofthesuperstructure. Thisloaddistributionisused tomimicadirecthorizontalaccelerationonthesuperstructuremass. Theloadisappliedthiswaybecause thebentisisolated usingstagedconstructionandthesuperstructureisnotpresentforthetransversepushoverloadcase. Asmentionedabove,alateralloaddistributionproportionaltothefundamentalmodeshapeinthetransversedirectionisalsoacceptableprovidedthatatleast75%ofthestructuremassparticipatesinthemode.
Aspecialloadpatternmustbecreatedforthecolumndeadloadssincetheentirestructureisnotinplaceduringthepushoveranalysis. Anewloadpatterncalled“Dead-Col_Axial”isaddedasshowninFigure4.2.1.2-1 (Define menu > Load Patterns).
“Dead-Col_Axial”LoadPatternDefinitionFigure 4.2.1.2-1
Thecolumnaxialloads are1,250 kips (averageoftopandbottom). Thecolumndeadloadmomentsinthetransversedirectionaresmallandcanbeneglected. Figure4.2.1.2-2showsthejointforcesassignmentwindowforthe“Dead-Col_Axial”loadpattern (Assign menu > Joint Loads > Forces).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-77 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-42 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
JointForceAssignmentforLoadPattern“Dead-Col_Axial”Figure 4.2.1.2-2
AftertheforcesdefinedinFigure4.2.1.2-2havebeenassigned,theycanbeviewedasshowninFigure4.2.1.2-3.
WireframeViewofAssignedForcesforLoadPattern“Dead-Col_Axial”Figure 4.2.1.2-3
Todefinethetransversepushoveranalysislateralloaddistribution,a newloadpatterncalled“Trans_Push”isaddedasshowninFigure4.2.1.2-4 (Define menu > Load Patterns).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-78 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-43August 2010
“Trans_Push”LoadPatternDefinitionFigure 4.2.1.2-4
Sincethesuperstructureisnotdefined asaspineelement,thereis nojointintheplaneofthebentlocatedatthecentroidofthesuperstructure. Therefore,theloaddistributionforthetransversepushoveranalysisisanequivalenthorizontalloadconsistingofapointloadandamomentappliedatthecentercrossbeam joint. Thecentroidofthesuperstructureislocated58.83inches abovethecenterjoint. Asaresult, a jointforcewithahorizontalpointloadof100kipsandamomentof100*58.83=5,883kip-inches isused. Specialcareshouldbetakentoensurethat theshearandmomentareappliedintheproperdirections. ThejointforcesareassignedtothecrossbeamcenterjointasshowninFigure4.2.1.2-5 (Assign menu > Joint Loads > Forces).
JointForceAssignmentforLoadPattern“Trans_Push”Figure 4.2.1.2-5
AftertheforcesdefinedinFigure4.2.1.2-5 havebeenassigned,theycanbeviewedasshowninFigure4.2.1.2-6.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-79 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-44 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
WireframeViewofAssignedForcesforLoadPattern“Trans_Push”Figure 4.2.1.2-6
4.2.2 LoadCaseSetup
4.2.2.1 LongitudinalDirection
Thedeadload(DC+DW)mustbeappliedpriortoperformingthepushoveranalysis. Todosointhelongitudinaldirection,anewloadcaseiscreatedcalled“LongPushSetup”. Inthisloadcase,thedeadload(DC+DW)isappliedandthecaseisrunasa nonlinearanalysis. Byrunningtheloadcaseasanonlinearanalysistype, anotherloadcasecancontinuefromitwith theloadsstoredinthestructure.
TheLoad Case Data formforthe“LongPushSetup”loadcaseisshowninFigure4.2.2.1-1(Define menu > Load Cases > select LongPushSetup > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-80 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-45August 2010
LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“LongPushSetup”Figure 4.2.2.1-1
ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.1-1that theInitial Conditions aresettoZero Initial Conditions – Start from Unstressed State, theLoad Case Type isStatic, theAnalysis Type issettoNonlinear,andtheGeometric Nonlinearity Parameters aresettoNone.
Anewloadcaseisnowcreatedcalled“LongPush”,whichwillactuallybethepushoveranalysiscase. TheLoad Case Data formforthe“LongPush”loadcaseisshowninFigure4.2.2.1-2(Define menu > Load Cases > select LongPush > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-81 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-46 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 4.2.2.1-2
ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.1-2thattheInitial Conditions aresettoContinue from State at End of Nonlinear Case “LongPushSetup”, theLoad Case Type isStatic, theAnalysis Type isNonlinear,andtheGeometric Nonlinearity Parameters aresetto None. Under Loads Applied,theLoad Type issettoAccel intheUX directionwithaScale Factor equalto-1. ApplyingtheaccelerationinthenegativeX-directionresultsinanegative baseshear and positiveX-directiondisplacements.
ByclickingtheModify/Show buttonfortheLoad Application parametersinFigure4.2.2.1-2,thewindowshowninFigure4.2.2.1-3opens. ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.1-3thattheLoad Application Control issettoDisplacement Control, theLoad to a Monitored Displacement Magnitude of valueissetat 11 inches whichisgreater thanthelongitudinaldisplacementdemandof8.76 inches. Also,theDOF beingtrackedisU1 at Joint 33.
LoadApplicationControlforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 4.2.2.1-3
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-82 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-47August 2010
ByclickingtheModify/Show buttonfortheResults Saved inFigure4.2.2.1-2, thewindowshowninFigure4.2.2.1-4opens. ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.1-4thattheResults Saved optionissettoMultiple States, theMinimum Number of Saved States issetto22,whichensuresthatastepwilloccurforatleasteveryhalf-inch ofdisplacement. Also,theSave positive Displacement Increments Only boxischecked.
ResultsSavedforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 4.2.2.1-4
4.2.2.2 Transverse Direction
Aswiththelongitudinaldirection,thedeadloadmustbeappliedpriortoperformingthepushoveranalysisinthetransversedirection. However,forthetransversedirection,asinglebentwillbeisolatedusingstagedconstructionpriortoperformingthepushoveranalysis. Todoso,theelementsatPier2areselectedandthenassignedtoa group (Assign menu > Assign to Group). Figure4.2.2.2-1showstheGroup Definition forthegroup“Pier2” (Define menu > Groups > select Pier2 > click Modify/Show Group button).
GroupDefinitionforGroup“Pier2”Figure 4.2.2.2-1
Toisolatethebentandapplythestaticloadstothecolumns,astagedconstructionloadcasecalled“TransPushSetup”iscreated (Define menu > Load Cases > select TransPushSetup > click Modify/Show Load Case button). The“TransPushSetup”analysiscasehastwostages,onetoisolatethebent,andonetoapplythecolumnaxialloads. Notethesetwostagescouldbe
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-83 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-48 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
combinedintoonestagewithoutalteringtheresults. Stage1ofthe“TransPushSetup”loadcasedefinitionisshowninFigure4.2.2.2-2.
Stage1LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“TransPushSetup”Figure 4.2.2.2-2
ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.2-2thattheonlyelementsaddedarethoseinthegroup“Pier2”,theInitial Conditions aresettoZero Initial Conditions – Start from Unstressed State, theLoad Case Type isStatic, theAnalysis Type issettoNonlinear Staged Construction,andtheGeometric Nonlinearity Parameters aresettoNone. Stage2ofthe“TransPushSetup”load casedefinitionisshowninFigure4.2.2.2-3.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-84 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-49August 2010
Stage2LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“TransPushSetup”Figure 4.2.2.2-3
ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.2-3thattheloadpattern“Dead-Col_Axial”isapplied.
Anewloadcaseisnowcreatedcalled“TransPush”,whichwillactuallybethepushoveranalysiscase. TheLoad Case Data formforthe“TransPush”loadcaseisshowninFigure4.2.2.2-4(Define menu > Load Cases > select TransPush > click Modify/Show Load Case button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-85 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-50 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
LoadCaseDataforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 4.2.2.2-4
ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.2-4thattheInitial Conditions aresettoContinue from State at End of Nonlinear Case “TransPushSetup”,theLoad Case Type isStatic,theAnalysis Type isNonlinear,andtheGeometric Nonlinearity Parameters aresettoNone. Under Loads Applied,theLoad Type issettoLoad Pattern withtheLoad Name settoTrans_Push and the Scale Factor isequalto1.
ByclickingtheModify/Show buttonfortheLoad Application parametersinFigure4.2.2.2-4,thewindowshowninFigure4.2.2.2-5 opens. ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.2-5 thattheLoad Application Control issettoDisplacement Control,theLoad to a Monitored Displacement Magnitude of valueissetat10 inches,whichislargerthanthetransversedisplacementdemandof6.07 inches. Also, theDOF beingtrackedisU2 at Joint 33.
LoadApplicationControlforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 4.2.2.2-5
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-86 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-51August 2010
ByclickingtheModify/Show buttonfortheResults Saved inFigure4.2.2.2-4,thewindowshowninFigure4.2.2.2-6opens. ItisseeninFigure4.2.2.2-6thattheResults Saved optionissettoMultiple States,theMinimum Number of Saved States issetto20, whichensuresthatastepwilloccurforatleasteveryhalf-inchofdisplacement. Also, theSave positive Displacement Increments Only boxischecked.
ResultsSavedforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 4.2.2.2-6
4.2.3 LoadCaseResults
4.2.3.1 LongitudinalDirection
ThesystempushovercurveforthelongitudinaldirectionisshowninFigure4.2.3.1-1(Display menu > Show Static Pushover Curve). Thepointonthecurvewherethebaseshearbeginstodecreaseindicatesthedisplacementatwhichthefirstplastichingereachesitscurvaturelimitstate andisthedisplacementcapacityofthestructure.
PushoverCurveforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 4.2.3.1-1
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-87 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-52 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
Figures4.2.3.1-2through4.2.3.1-13 showthedeformedshapeofthestructureatvariousdisplacementsfortheloadcase“LongPush” (Display menu > Show Deformed Shape > selectLongPush > click OK button). Notethattheplastichingecolorschemetermssuchas“IO”,“LS”,and“CP”areinreference toperformancebaseddesignofbuildingstructures. However,forCaltransplastichinges,thecolorsarediscretizedevenlyalongtheplasticdeformation.Therefore,thecolorschemestillprovidesavisualrepresentationofthehingeplasticstrainprogressionthatisuseful.
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=0.0 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-2
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-88 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-53August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=2.3 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-3
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=2.8 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-4
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-89 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-54 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=3.5 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-5
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=4.4 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-6
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-90 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-55August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoad Case“LongPush”atUX=4.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-7
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=5.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-8
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-91 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-56 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=6.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-9
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=7.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-10
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-92 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-57August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=8.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-11
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=9.9 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-12
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-93 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-58 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
View ofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“LongPush”atUX=10.7 in.Figure 4.2.3.1-13
4.2.3.2 TransverseDirection
Thesystempushovercurveforthetransverse directionisshowninFigure4.2.3.2-1(Display menu > Show Static Pushover Curve). Thepointonthecurvewherethebaseshearbeginstodecreaseindicatesthedisplacementatwhichthefirstplastichingereachesitscurvaturelimitstate andisthedisplacementcapacityofthestructure.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-94 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-59August 2010
PushoverCurveforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 4.2.3.2-1
Figures4.2.3.2-2through4.2.3.2-13 showthedeformedshapeofthestructureatvariousdisplacementsfortheloadcase“TransPush” (Display menu > Show Deformed Shape > selectTransPush > click OK button). Notethattheplastichingecolorschemeterms suchas“IO”,“LS”,and“CP”areinreferencetoperformance-baseddesignofbuildingstructures. However,forCaltransplastichinges,thecolorsarediscretizedevenlyalongtheplasticdeformation.Therefore,thecolorschemestillprovidesavisualrepresentationofthehingeplasticstrainprogressionthatisuseful.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-95 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-60 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=0.0 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-2
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=2.0 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-3
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-96 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-61August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=2.8 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-4
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=3.1 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-5
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-97 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-62 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=4.6 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-6
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY= 5.1 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-7
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-98 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-63August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=6.6 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-8
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=7.1 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-9
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-99 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-64 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=7.6 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-10
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=8.1 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-11
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-100 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-65August 2010
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=8.6 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-12
ViewofDeformedShapefortheLoadCase“TransPush”atUY=9.5 in.Figure 4.2.3.2-13
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-101 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-66 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
5. CodeRequirements5.1 P-Δ CapacityRequirementCheckTherequirementsofsection4.11.5oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbesatisfiedoranonlineartimehistoryanalysisthatincludesP-Δ effects mustbeperformed. Therequirementisasfollows:
PdlΔr ≤ 0.25 MpWhere:
Pdl = unfactoreddeadloadactingonthecolumn(kip)= 1,250 kips
Δr = relativelateraloffsetbetweenthepointofcontraflexureandthefurthestendoftheplastichinge(in.)= ΔL
D /2 (Assumedsincetheinflectionpointislocatedatapproximatelymid-heightofthecolumn. Iftherequirementsarenotmet,amoreadvancedcalculation of Δr willbeperformed)
Mp = idealizedplasticmomentcapacityofreinforcedconcretecolumnbaseduponexpectedmaterialproperties(kip-in.)
= 78,560 kip-in. (SeeFigure3.1.2-1)
5.1.1 LongitudinalDirection
0.25Mp= 0.25 * 78,560= 19,640 kip-in.
Δr = ΔLD_Long /2
= 8.76 /2= 4.38 in.
PdlΔr = 1,250 * 4.38= 5,475 kip-in. < 0.25Mp =19,640 kip-in. =>Okay
5.1.2 TransverseDirection
Δr = ΔLD_Trans /2
= 6.07 /2= 3.04 in.
PdlΔr = 1,250 kips*3.04= 3,800 kip-in. < 0.25Mp =19,640 kip-in. =>Okay
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-102 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-67August 2010
5.2 MinimumLateralStrengthCheckTherequirementsofSection8.7.1oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbesatisfied. Therequirementisasfollows:
Mne ≥ 0.1Ptrib (Hh +0.5Ds) / ΛWhere:
Mne = nominalmomentcapacityofthecolumnbaseduponexpectedmaterialpropertiesasshowninFigure8.5-1 oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design (kip-in.)
Ptrib = greaterofthedeadloadpercolumnorforce associatedwiththetributaryseismicmasscollectedatthebent(kip)
Hh = theheightfromthetopofthefootingtothetopofthecolumnortheequivalentcolumnheightforapileextension(in.)
= 34.0 * 12 (Topoffootingtotopofcrossbeam)= 408in.
Ds = depthofsuperstructure(in.)= 7.083 * 12= 85in.
Λ = fixityfactor (SeeSection4.8.1oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design)
= 2forfixedtopandbottom
DeterminePtrib:
Sincetheabutmentsarebeingmodeledasfreeinthelongitudinaldirection,alloftheseismicmassiscollectedatthebentsinthelongitudinaldirection. Therefore,theforceassociatedwiththetributaryseismicmasscollectedatthebentisgreaterthanthedeadloadpercolumn andiscomputedasfollows:
Ptrib = WeightofStructure/#ofbents/#ofcolumnsperbent= 6,638 /2/2= 1,660 kips
Note that amoresophisticatedanalysistodeterminethetributaryseismicmasswouldbenecessaryif thebridgewerenotsymmetricandthebentsdidnothaveequalstiffness.
DetermineMne:
Section8.5oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design definesMneastheexpectednominalmomentcapacitybasedontheexpectedconcreteandreinforcingsteelstrengths whentheconcretestrainreachesamagnitudeof0.003. SectionDesignerinSAP2000canbeusedtodetermineMne byperformingamoment-curvatureanalysisanddisplayingthemomentwhentheconcretereachesastrainof0.003. Themoment-curvature diagramforthecolumnsectionisshowninFigure5.2-1withvaluesdisplayedataconcretestrainof0.002989(Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-103 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-68 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
Property button > click Section Designer button > Display menu > Show Moment-Curvature Curve).
Moment-CurvatureCurve forFrameSection “COL” at εc =0.003Figure 5.2-1
ItisseeninFigure5.2-1 thatMne = 73,482 kip-inches.
PerformCheck:
0.1Ptrib (Hh +0.5Ds) / Λ = 0.1*1,660 *(408 +0.5*85)/2= 37,392 kip-in. < 73,482 kip-in. = Mne =>Okay
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-104 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-69August 2010
5.3 StructureDisplacementDemand/Capacity CheckTherequirementsofSection4.8oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbesatisfied. Therequirementisasfollows:
ΔLD < ΔL
CWhere:
ΔLD = displacementdemandtakenalongthelocalprincipalaxisoftheductile
member(in.)
ΔLC = displacement capacity taken along the local principal axis corresponding to ΔL
Doftheductilemember(in.)
5.3.1 LongitudinalDirection
Fromsection3.3.2.1,thedisplacementdemandinthelongitudinaldirectionisΔLD_Long = 8.73
inches.
Determine ΔLC_Long:
ThedisplacementcapacitycanbedeterminedfromthepushovercurveasshowinFigure5.3.1-1(Display menu > Show Static Pushover Curve).
PushoverCurveforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 5.3.1-1
Thedisplacementatwhichthefirsthingeruptures(fails)isthedisplacementcapacityofthestructure andisalsothe pointatwhichthebaseshearbeginstodecrease. ItcanbeseeninFigure5.3.1-1thatthebasesheardoesnotdecrease untila displacementofapproximately 11 inches.Thissuggests thedisplacementcapacityofthebridge inthelongitudinaldirectionisgreaterthan
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-105 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-70 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
thedisplacementdemand. Toconfirmthis,thetableshowninFigure5.3.1-2canbedisplayedbyclickingFile menu > Display Tables inFigure5.3.1-1.
PushoverCurveTabularDataforLoadCase“LongPush”Figure 5.3.1-2
Figure5.3.1-2showsthestep,displacement,baseforce,andhingestatedataforthelongitudinalpushoveranalysis. Bydefinition,hingesfailiftheyareinthe“BeyondE”hingestate. InFigure5.3.1-2itcanbeseenthatstep23isthefirststepany hingesreachthe“BeyondE”hingestate.Therefore, ΔL
C_Long = 10.69 inches andthefollowingcanbestated:
ΔLC_Long = 10.69 in. > ΔL
D_Long = 8.76 in. => LongitudinalDisplacementDemand/CapacityisOkay
5.3.2 TransverseDirection
FromSection3.3.2.2 ofthisexample,thedisplacementdemand inthetransversedirectionisΔL
D_Trans = 6.07 inches.
Determine ΔLC_Trans:
ThedisplacementcapacitycanbedeterminedfromthepushovercurveasshowinFigure5.3.2-1(Display menu > Show Static Pushover Curve).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-106 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-71August 2010
PushoverCurveforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 5.3.2-1
Asmentionedabove,thedisplacementatwhichthefirstplastichingeruptures(fails)isthedisplacementcapacityofthestructure andisalsothepointatwhichthebaseshearbeginstodecrease. ItcanbeseeninFigure5.3.2-1 thatthebasesheardoesnotdecreaseuntiladisplacementofapproximately 9.5 inches. Thissuggeststhedisplacementcapacityofthebridgeinthetransversedirectionisgreaterthanthedisplacementdemand. Toconfirmthis,thetableshowninFigure5.3.2-2 canbedisplayedbyclickingFile menu > Display Tables inFigure5.3.2-1.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-107 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-72 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
PushoverCurveTabularDataforLoadCase“TransPush”Figure 5.3.2-2
Figure5.3.2-2 showsthestep,displacement,baseforce,andhingestatedataforthetransversepushoveranalysis. Recallthetransversepushoveranalysisonlyincludesasinglebent. Bydefinition,hingesfailiftheyareinthe“BeyondE”hingestate. InFigure5.3.2-2 itcanbeseenthatstep21isthefirststepanyhingesreachthe“BeyondE”hingestate. Therefore, ΔL
C_Trans =9.51 inches andthefollowingcanbestated:
ΔLC_Trans = 9.51 in.>ΔL
D_Trans = 6.07 in. => TransverseDisplacementDemand/CapacityisOkay
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-108 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-73August 2010
5.4 MemberDuctilityRequirement CheckTherequirementsforhingeductilitydemandsinSection4.9oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbemetforallhingesinthestructure. Thememberductilitydemandmaybecomputedasfollows:
μD ≤ 6(formultiplecolumnbents)Where:
μD = ductilitydemand= 1 + Δpd / Δyi
Δyi = idealizedyielddisplacement(doesnotincludesoileffects)(in.)= φyi * L2 /3
L = lengthfrompointofmaximummomenttotheinflectionpoint(in.)
φyi = idealizedyieldcurvature(1/in.)
Δpd = plasticdisplacementdemand(in.)= θpd *(L– 0.5*Lp)
θpd = plasticrotationdemanddeterminedbySAP2000(rad.)
Lp = plastichingelength(in.)
Therefore:μD = 1 + 3 * [θpd / (φyi *L)]*(1– 0.5 * Lp /L)
Thisexamplewillexplicitlyshowhowtocomputetheductilitydemandforthelowerhingeofthetrailingcolumnbeingdeflectedinthetransversedirection. Theductilitydemandsfortheremaininghingesarepresentedintabularformat.
DetermineL:
Thelocations oftheinflectionpointswereapproximatedpreviouslytodeterminethehingelengths. However,nowthatthepushoveranalysishasbeenperformed,theactualinflectionpointscanbedetermined.
Figure5.3.2-2showsthatatstep13thedisplacementis6.11inches,whichisslightlygreaterthanthedisplacementdemand. Figure5.4-1showsthecolumnmoment2-2diagramat step13 oftheTransPushloadcaseasdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Forces/Stresses > Frames/Cables > select TransPush > select Moment 2-2 > select Step 13 > click OK button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-109 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-74 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
Frame Moment 2-2DiagramforLoadCase“TransPush” at Step 13Figure 5.4-1
Fromthisinformationitisfoundthattheinflectionpointis59 inches abovethelowerjointonthemiddlecolumnelementandthefollowingiscomputed:
L = Lengthfrompointofmaximummomentatbaseofcolumntoinflectionpoint= LengthofLowerElement– FootingOffset+59= 146 – 30+59= 175 in.
Determine θpd:
Sincethedisplacementofthebentatstep13isgreaterthanthedisplacementdemand,theplasticrotationatstep13isgreaterthanor equaltotheplasticrotationdemand. The plasticrotationateachstepcanbefounddirectlyfromthehingeresults inSAP2000. Thenameofthelowerhingeonthetrailingcolumnis1H1. Figure5.4-2showstheplasticrotationplotofhinge1H1atstep13 oftheTransPushloadcase(Display menu > Show Hinge Results > select hinge 1H1 (Auto P-M2) > select load case TransPush > select step 13 > click OK button).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-110 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-75August 2010
Hinge“1H1”PlasticRotationResultsforLoadCase“TransPush”atStep13Figure 5.4-2
Figure5.4-2showsthattheplasticrotationforhinge1H1is0.0129 radians. Therefore θpd =0.0129 radians.
Determineφyi:
Theidealizedyieldcurvaturewillbefoundby determiningtheaxialloadinthehingeatfirstyieldandtheninputtingthatloadintoSectionDesigner. Theaxialloadatyieldcanbefoundbyviewingthehingeresults atstep4 (whenthehingefirstyields). Figure5.4-3showstheaxialplasticdeformationplotofhinge1H1atstep4 oftheTransPushloadcase(Display menu > Show Hinge Results > select hinge 1H1 (Auto P-M2) > select load case TransPush > select step 4 > select hinge DOF P > click OK button).
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-111 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-76 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
Hinge“1H1”AxialPlasticDeformationResultsforLoadCase“TransPush”atStep 4
Figure 5.4-3
Figure5.4-3showsthattheaxialloadinhinge1H1atstep4 oftheTransPushloadcaseis-432kips. ThatloadcannowbeenteredintoSectionDesignertodeterminetheidealizedyieldcurvature, φyi. Themoment-curvaturediagramforthecolumnsectionwithP=-432 kipsisshowninFigure5.4-4(Define menu > Section Properties > Frame Sections > select COL > click Modify/Show Property button > click Section Designer button > Display menu > Show Moment-Curvature Curve).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-112 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-77August 2010
Moment-CurvatureCurve forFrameSection“COL”atP=-432 kipsFigure 5.4-4
Figure5.4-4showsthatPhi-yield(Idealized)=.00009294. Therefore: φyi = 0.00009294 inches-1.
Theductilitydemandinthetransversedirectionforthelowerhingeinthetrailingcolumncannowbecalculatedasfollows:
μD = 1 + 3 * [θpd / (φyi *L)]*(1– 0.5 * Lp /L)Where:
L = 175in.
φyi = 0.00009294 in.-1
θpd = 0.0129 rad.
Lp = 27.0 in.
Therefore:μD = 1+3*[0.0129 /(0.00009294 *175)]*(1– 0.5 * 27.0 /175)
= 3.2 <6=>okay
TheductilitydemandsandrelatedvaluesforallcolumnhingesareshowninTable5.4-1.
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-113 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-78 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
PushoverDirection
ColumnandHingeLocation
HingeName
YieldStep
AxialLoadatYield
φyi θpd Lp L μD
(Long/Trans) (-) (-) (#) (kips) (1/in.) (rad.) (in.) (in.) (-)
Longitudinal TrailingLower 1H2 5 -1222 .0000889 .0207 27.0 175 4.7
Longitudinal TrailingUpper 3H2 6 -1135 .00008926 .0204 26.9 175 4.6
Longitudinal LeadingLower 7H2 6 -1354 .00008851 .0195 27.0 175 4.5
Longitudinal LeadingUpper 9H2 8 -1277 .0000887 .0168 26.9 175 4.0
Transverse TrailingLower 1H1 4 -432 .00009294 .0129 27.0 175 3.2
Transverse TrailingUpper 3H1 5 -305 .00009292 .0118 26.9 175 3.0
Transverse LeadingLower 4H1 6 -2226 .00009185 .0104 27.0 175 2.8
Transverse LeadingUpper 6H1 7 -2253 .00009186 .00902 26.9 175 2.6
DuctilityDemandsforAllColumnHingesTable 5.4-1
Table5.4-1showsthatallhingeductilitydemandsarelessthan6.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-114 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-79August 2010
5.5 ColumnShearDemand/CapacityCheckThecolumnshearrequirementsinSection8.6oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbemetforallcolumnsinthestructure.
φsVn ≥ Vu
Where:φs = 0.9Vn = nominalshearcapacity(kips)
= Vc +Vs
ConcreteShearCapacity:Vc = concretecontributiontoshearcapacity (kips)
= vcAeWhere:
Ae = 0.8AgAg = grossareaofmembercross-section(in.2)
vc ifPu iscompressive:vc = 0.032 α’ [1 + Pu /(2Ag)]f’c1/2 ≤ min ( 0.11 f’c1/2 , 0.047 α’ f’c1/2)
vc otherwise:vc = 0
Forcircularcolumnswithspiralreinforcing:
0.3 ≤ α’ = fs /0.15+3.67- µD ≤ 3fs = ρsfyh ≤ 0.35ρs = (4Asp)/(sD’)
Where:Pu = ultimatecompressiveforceactingonsection(kips)Asp = areaofspiral(in.2)s = pitchofspiral(in.)D’ = diameterofspiral(in.)fyh = nominalyieldstressofspiral(ksi)f’c = nominalconcretestrength(ksi)µD = maximumlocalductilitydemandofmember
SteelShearCapacity:
Vs = steelcontributiontoshearcapacity(kips)Vs = (π / 2) (Asp fyh D’)/s
Thisexamplewillexplicitlyshowhowtoperformthesheardemand/capacitycheckforthetrailingcolumnbeingdeflectedinthetransversedirection. Thesheardemand/capacitychecksfortheremainingcolumnsarepresentedintabularformat.
DetermineVu:
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-115 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-80 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
Figure5.5-1showsthecolumnsheardiagramfortheTransPushloadcaseasdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Forces/Stresses > Frames/Cables > select TransPush >select Shear 3-3 > select Step 13 > click OK button).
FrameShear3-3DiagramforLoadCase“TransPush”atStep13Figure 5.5-1
FromFigure5.5-1itisdeterminedthattheplasticshearinthetrailingcolumnis389 kips.Section8.6.1statesthatVu shallbedeterminedonthebasisofVpo,whichistheshearassociatedwiththeoverstrengthmoment,Mpo,definedinSection8.5oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design. ForASTMA706reinforcementtheoverstrengthmagnifieris1.2,andsotheshearfortheSAP2000modelmustbemultipliedbythisfactor.
Therefore:Vu = λmo Vp
Where:λpo = 1.2Vp = 389 kips
andVu = 1.2 * 389
= 467 kips
DetermineVc:
Figure5.5-2showsthecolumnaxialloaddiagramfortheTransPushloadcaseasdisplayedinSAP2000(Display menu > Show Forces/Stresses > Frames/Cables > select TransPush >select Axial Force > select Step 13 > click OK button).
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-116 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-81August 2010
Frame AxialForce DiagramforLoadCase“TransPush”atStep13Figure 5.5-2
FromFigure5.5-2 itisdeterminedthattheaxialforceinthetrailingcolumnis-247 kips.
Therefore:Pu = 247 kipsAg = π * 602 /4
= 2827.4in.2
Ae = 0.8Ag= 0.8 * 2827.4= 2262in.2
Asp = 0.44in.2s = 3.5in.
D’ = 60 – 1.5 – 1.5 – 0.75= 56.25in.
fyh = 60ksif’c = 4ksiρs = (4Asp)/(sD’)
= (4*0.44)/(3.5*56.25)= 0.0089
fs = ρsfyh ≤ 0.35= 0.0089 * 60 ≤ 0.35= 0.54 ≤ 0.35= 0.35 ksi
Chapter 4 Seismic Design and Retrofit
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 Page 4-117 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
Page 4-B2-82 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04August 2010
µD = 3.2(seeSection5.4ofthisexample)
0.3 ≤ α’ = fs /0.15+3.67- µD ≤ 3= 0.35/0.15+3.67– 3.2 ≤ 3= 0.35/0.15+3.67– 3.2 ≤ 3= 2.8 ≤ 3
α’ = 2.8
vc = 0.032 α’ [1 + Pu /(2Ag)]f’c1/2 ≤ min ( 0.11 f’c1/2 , 0.047 α’ f’c1/2)= 0.032*2.8*[1+247 /(2*2827.4)]41/2 ≤ min(0.11*41/2,0.047*2.8*41/2)= 0.187 ≤ min (0.22 , 0.263)= 0.187 ksi
Vc = vcAe= 0.187 * 2262= 423 kips
DetermineVs:Vs = (π / 2) (Asp fyh D’)/s
= (π / 2) (0.44 * 60 * 56.25)/3.5= 666 kips
Determine φsVn:
φsVn = φs (Vc +Vs)= 0.9*(423 +666)= 980 kips>Vu = 467 kips=> okay
ThesheardemandsandcapacitiesandrelatedvaluesforallcolumnsareshowninTable5.5-1.
PushoverDirection Column Vp Vu Pu µD α' vc Vc Vs φsVn
(Long/Trans) (-) (kips) (kips) (kips) (-) (-) (ksi) (kips) (kips) (kips)Longitudinal Trailing 484 581 1175 4.7 1.3 0.10 228 666 804Longitudinal Leading 497 596 1320 4.5 1.5 0.12 268 666 841Transverse Trailing 389 467 247 3.2 2.8 0.19 423 666 980Transverse Leading 580 696 2253 2.8 3.0 0.22 498 666 1047
ColumnShearDemandsandCapacitiesTable 5.5-1
Table5.5-1showsthattheshearcapacitiesaregreaterthanthesheardemandsforallcolumns.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-118 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
SAP2000 Seismic Analysis Example
WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M23-50.04 Page 4-B2-83August 2010
5.6 BalancedStiffnessandFrameGeometryRequirement CheckThebalancedstiffnessandbalancedframegeometryrequirementsofSections4.1.2and4.1.3oftheAASHTO Guide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design mustbemet. Duetothesymmetryofthisexample,theserequirementsareokaybyinspection. However,onmanybridgestheserequirementsmay highlyinfluencethedesign.
Seismic Design and Retrofit Chapter 4
Page 4-30 WSDOT Bridge Design Manual M 23-50.17 June 2017
4.99 ReferencesAASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications,6thEdition,2012
AASHTOGuide Specifications for LRFD Seismic Bridge Design,2ndEdition,2011
AASHTOGuide Specifications for Seismic Isolation Design,3rdEdition,2010
CaltransBridge Design Aids144JointShearModelingGuidelinesforExistingStructures,CaliforniaDepartmentofTransportation,August2008
FHWASeismic Retrofitting Manual for Highway Structures: Part 1 Bridges,PublicationNo.FHWA-HRT-06-032,January2006
McLean,D.I.andSmith,C.L.,Noncontact Lap Splices in Bridge Column-Shaft Connections,ReportNumberWA-RD417.1,WashingtonStateUniversity
WSDOTGeotechnical Design ManualM46-03,EnvironmentalandEngineeringProgram,GeotechnicalServices,WashingtonStateDepartmentofTransportation