building behaviour change into ltp3 chris hanley clasp workshop 11 th november 2010
DESCRIPTION
Building Behaviour Change into LTP3 Chris Hanley CLASP workshop 11 th November 2010. Introduction. DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund. DaSTS overall aim. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Building Behaviour Change into LTP3
Chris HanleyCLASP workshop
11th November 2010
2
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
3
DaSTS overall aim
“To develop a regional (now local!) smarter choices strategy that will optimise the benefits of carbon savings and value for money, whilst ensuring practical monitoring.”
4
Golden rules
Financially viable Carbon abatement Modal shift
5
Where are we now?
6
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
7
Shortlisted areas
LA Overall Rank
Warrington 40
Crewe 38
Stockport 34
Eden 30
8
What are we asking the pilot areas to do? Set up local schemes and initiatives Implement a clear monitoring framework Track programme benefits Work with the community Work with LEPs Focus on high carbon trip types
9
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
10
Overview North-West Region
0
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
700,000
Less than 2km 2km - 5km 5km - 10km 10km - 20km More than 20km
Car driver and motorcycle
Car passenger or taxi
Public transport
Cycle
Walk
11
Carbon abatement - journey distance by trip type
12
Priority spending – carbon abatement Ultimately we must target the factors that
are used to calculate emissions:
Mode Technical and operational efficiency Journey distance Speed Number of trips
13
How to prioritise spending on Smarter Choices
Priority Measures Included
(1) Reducing the number of trips
HomeworkingTele/video conferencingHomeshopping / e-payments
(2) Reducing journey length
Community hubsIntegrated bicycle and rail/busBike rental schemes
(3) Technical and operational efficiency
Plugged-In PlacesDriver trainingFleet managementFiscal policy
(4) Affecting speed and congestion relief
Freight controlPeak user chargingMulti-occupancy lanesAverage speed cameras
(5) Mode switch Cycling facilities upgradesCar clubs / car sharing databaseParking policy
14
Carbon impacts: analysis of schemes Reviewed case studies, evidence and
theoretical framework for measures in relation to:
Total saving of each measure which is based on the percentage saving proportionate to the approximate NI 186 20% saving needed for 2020.
Cost effectiveness – cost of each measure per tonne of CO2 abated.
15
Priority measures – carbon abatement
Policy or measure
Total saving (based on 20% target by 2020) Cost effectiveness Impact Rank
Land use planning decisions Up to 2% Cost neutral High 1
Quality bus partnerships 1-1.5% £30 per tonne abated High 1
Car share matching Up to 1% £10-15 per tonne High 1
Partnership with telecomms providers 0.6%-1% £10 per tonne High 1
Congestion or road user charging 1-1.5% Cost neutral High 1
Workplace Parking Levy 0.80% £20 per tonne Medium 1
Community hubs 1% £5 per tonne High 1
Freight quality partnerships Up to 2% £35 per tonne High 1
River freight transport 0.2-0.3% £5-10 per tonne Medium 1
Introduction/increase of CPZs and parking charges 1-1.5% £20 per tonne High 1
Emissions based charging across workplaces and Council car parks 2-2.5% £20 per tonne High 1
Driver training 0.20% £20 per tonne High 1
16
Evaluation (1) Best returns on investment in parking,
freight, technology and planning policy. Cycling and walking and bus measures will
generally score poorly as they are targeting short trips
Largest gains will be made to middle distance commute, business travel, leisure and shopping i.e. especially between 5 and 25 miles.
BUT NEED TO CONSIDER WIDER SOCIO-ECONOMIC IMPACTS
17
Wider Council impacts
Policy or measure
Economic Growth
Children and Young People
Safer and Stronger Communities
Adult health and wellbeing
Environmental sustainability
Resources and efficiency
Equality and diversity
Local authority impact
Land-use planning decisions Y Y Y y Y Y Y 7
School travel planning Y Y Y Y Y 5
Workplace and destination based travel plans Y Y Y Y Y 5
Quality bus partnerships Y Y Y Y Y 5
Cycle network improvements Y Y Y Y 4
Cycle parking Y Y Y Y 4
Car clubs Y Y 2
Car share database Y Y 2
Traffic management Y 1
Work with HA on IDM Y 1
18
Evaluation (2) Cycling and walking score highest when
looking at the wider local authority objectives
Land use planning decisions, integrated community initiatives and PTP also score highly
Parking measures and fiscal measures more controversial
19
What does this all mean?
Informed local decisions on policy Balanced view of priorities Less reliance on PPG13 Focus resources Re-skilling of transport and land use
planners
20
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
21
Targeting different trip types School
Car sharing Cycle training
Workplace Parking management Use of technology
Retail Homeshopping Parking management
Leisure Integrated hubs Introduction of EVs
22
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
23
Delivering at the right levelLevel Projects
Neighbourhood Parking policyCycle infrastructureCommunity travel
Local Travel plansBike rental schemesCommunity hubs
Inter-local EV procurementDriver trainingFleet management
Regional Marketing and advertisingRail connectivityOrigin and destination analysis
24
Introduction
DaSTS update Pilot areas Carbon abatement in LTP3 Targeting of different trip types Shared delivery of smarter choices Local Sustainable Transport Fund
25
New LSTP
Develop packages of measures that support economic growth and reduce carbon in their communities as well as delivering cleaner environments, improved safety and increased levels of physical activity.
26
Proposed schemes Encouraging walking and cycling Initiatives to improve integration between
travel modes and end-to-end journey experiences
Better public transport Improved traffic management schemes.
27
Possible ideas Integrated rail and
cycle Fare free zones Bus for bikes School car share
linked to infrastructure Small EVs for leisure
trips Community travel
plans
28
Contact details Chris Hanley
Colin Buchanan, 20 Eastbourne Terrace, London, W2 6LG 020 7053 1434 [email protected]