business law - csuf
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
1/21
Chapter 2
Recruitment, Selection,Testing, and Termination
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
2/21
The Environment of Employment Law
The Civil and Public Branches of the Law
Civil law involves private dispute
Includes property law, inheritance, family law and thelaw relating to business entities
Public law governs a persons personal rights and obligationsin relation to government
Includes criminal law, constitutional law, administrativelaw, and international law
Laws are derived from: federal and state constitutions, statutesand executive orders; local ordinances; the orders, rules, andregulations of administrative agencies; and, publisheddecisions of federal and state courts. These sources reflectthe mores, values and traditions of the governed
2
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
3/21
The Environment of Employment Law Contd
Substantive and Procedural Law
Substantive law establishes by statute and case precedents theprinciples and definitions of rights and legal relationships
Procedural law addresses the means and methods of the legalprocess
Our study will focus on the substantive law aspects ofemployment and labor law
3
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
4/21
The Environment of Employment Law Contd
Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution
Checks and Balances
Legislative branch enacts laws
Executive branch enforces the law. It may create administrativeagencies to enact regulations and enforce both laws and agencyregulations.
Examples: Federal executive branch departments such as U.S. Departmentof Labor and Homeland Security.
Judicial branch interprets and applies these laws and determinesprivate disputes
4
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
5/21
The Environment of Employment Law Contd
Judicial System
Adjudication: legal process by which a court or arbitrator appliesthe law to facts determined by the court, jury or arbitrator That result is binding only upon those parties to that particular dispute
Stare Decisis: lower courts must apply prior decisions of highercourts in similar cases as binding precedent once certaincommon facts between the cases has been established
Federal courts exercise two types of subject matter jurisdictionexcept matters related to constitutionality of an act of Congressor the executive branch: federal question jurisdiction: decide a dispute arising under federal law
diversity jurisdiction: amount in controversy exceeds $75,000 and all partiesto the litigation are diverse in their citizenship
5
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
6/21
Interrelationship of Federal and State Laws
Federal and state laws are to be interpreted together and in acomplementary manner to provide the employee maximumprotection under the law n.b.: state or local law must not contradict federal law
Federal laws concerning civil rights are to be read in concertwith state and local laws Compliance with federal law may is insufficient if state or local discrimination
laws and ordinance afford broader protections or impose greater duties
State or local law may require the employer to provide additional protections notrecognized under federal law.
e.g. such laws may protect an individual from discrimination in employmentdue to marital status, sexual orientation, or personal appearance
6
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
7/21
The Hiring Process
An employer cannot use discriminatory selection methods
The main areas of concern are
defining job qualifications and selection criteria
recruiting interviewing the applicants
references, background checks, testing and medicalexaminations
7
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
8/21
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.(USSC (1971))
Issue: Did Duke Power Companys internal transfer policy violateTitle VII of the 1964 CRA when neither standard is related tojob performance?
Willie Griggs filed a class action lawsuit against his employer
Duke Power Company
He challenged inside transfer policy which required
employees who wanted to work in all but lowest paying jobs toobtain a minimum score on two separate aptitude tests aswell as have a high school diploma
He contended Dukes practices unlawfully discriminated
against black employees in violation of Title VII
8
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
9/21
Griggs Contd
Duke defended practice as a business necessity for safety ofemployees and public since the work was conducted at apower plant
Duke Power maintained a practice of not requiring the highschool education for white employees
The district court dismissed Griggs claim which the court of
appeals affirmed
9
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
10/21
Griggs Contd
Supreme Court held while nothing in the CRA precludes useof testing or measuring procedures, what Congress hasforbidden is giving these devices and mechanisms controllingforce unless they are demonstrably a reasonable measure ofjob performance
The Court concluded that what Congress has commanded isthat any tests used must measure the person for the job andnot the person in the abstract, and as such reversed the
decision of the court of appeals
Ethics: What should be required of a business to demonstratethat such tests are reasonably related to the position for
which the test is required?
10
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
11/21
Dothard v. Rawlinson(USSC (1977))
Issue: Could an employer screen applicants based upon theirheight and weight if it has a disparate impact upon women?
Dianne Rawlinson sought employment with the AlabamaBoard of Corrections as a prison guard, called in Alabama acorrectional counselor
At the time of application Rawlinson was a 22-year old collegegraduate whose major course of study was correctional
psychology
Rawlinson was refused employment because she failed tomeet the minimum 120-pound weight requirement
11
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
12/21
Dothard Contd
Rawlinson sued alleging she had been denied employmentbecause of her sex in violation of federal law
A three-judge federal district court ruled in Rawlinsons favor
The Board of Corrections for the state of Alabama appealedto the U.S. Supreme Court, which granted certiorari
Supreme Court found that while height and weight standardscould be a business necessity, the employer failed toestablish that fact
Due to the employer failing to establish business necessity,
the court ruled in favor of DothardEthics: Should we consider the effect upon the prisoners privacy
rights when they are searched by guards of the opposite sex?
12
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
13/21
Defining Job Qualifications and Selection
Criteria
Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986
An employer cannot discriminate on the grounds of nationalorigin, lack of United States citizenship, status as an alienlawfully admitted to the United States, or status as a refugee
Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 Employers cannot use age as a hiring criterion unless there is a
bona fide business purpose
Employers cannot have grooming, weight, and/or heightstandards unless they can prove it to be a business necessity
Height and weight standards may have a disparate impact onwomen
Grooming standards may have a disparate impact on AfricanAmerican men suffering frompseudofolliculitis barbae
13
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
14/21
Defining Job Qualifications and Selection
Criteria Contd
Discriminating against rehabilitated drug and alcohol abusersor physical requirements would violate Americans withDisabilities Act
Veterans or active duty military status may be taken intoaccount as a special preference
Applicants not fluent in English cannot be discriminated
against unless those communication skills are a businessnecessity
14
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
15/21
Recruiting and Interviewing
An employer cannot print or publish an advertisement for ajob that indicates a preference based on race, color, religion,sex, or national origin
None of these, along with education requirements, can beused as a basis for hiring unless there is a business necessityfor the job
Word of mouth and nepotism aprima facie case of disparate treatment can be established through statistical
evidence coupled with the fact that job vacancies were announced only throughword of mouth to potential applicants
Nepotism can constitute discrimination
15
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
16/21
Recruiting and Interviewing Contd
The employer may be liable for statements made toapplicants during the recruitment process
If promises made during an interview are not upheld, the
employee can bring an action for damages for breach ofcontract or fraud against the employer
A newly hired employee under past agreement not to divulgetrade secrets to a competitor will be liable if such agreement
is broken, as will the new company if it were to act on theinformation
16
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
17/21
Stutts v. Freeman(USCA 11th Cir. (1983))
Issue: Must an employer make reasonable accommodations inthe testing of handicapped applicants?
Joseph Stutts applied to enter an apprenticeship program forthe position of heavy equipment operator
He argued before the U.S. district court that he was anotherwise qualified handicapped individual under the
Rehabilitation Act of 1973
Stutts suffered from dyslexia
His application was denied on the basis of a low score on
the General Aptitude Test Battery
17
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
18/21
Stutts Contd District court granted summary judgment in favor of TVA.
Stutts appealed to the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appealswhich reversed on the basis the TVA had not made areasonable accommodation in the testing of a dyslexic patient
The court held when TVA uses a test which does notaccurately reflect the abilities of a handicapped person, as amatter of law they must do more to accommodate thatindividual
Ethics: What do you think are the reasonable limitations to therequirement to make a reasonable accommodation for an
applicant or employee?
18
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
19/21
Pre-Employment Testing and Investigations
The following types of questions can be regarded as unlawfuland can constitute discrimination
child care needs
year of graduation
clubs or social organization memberships
personal interests if they could evoke impermissible information
Employers should review local and state laws as they may
relate to prior employment inquires, credit checks and priorarrest and/or conviction records with regard to makingemployment decisions
19
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
20/21
Pre-Employment Contd
Medical examinations cannot be required before job offer isextended and the exams must be job related
Employers must be careful that pre-employment testing is not
discriminatory in effect, however unintentional
Tests that screen for illegal use of drugs is not considered amedical test
Drug testing has limitations under the Fourth Amendment andrandom testing is almost always held wrongful by the court asan illegal search and seizure
20
-
7/28/2019 Business Law - CSUF
21/21
Albemarle Paper Co. v. Moody(USSC (1975))
Issue: What must an employer show to establish that pre-employment tests racially discriminatory in effect, not in intent,are sufficiently job related?
A group of African American workers sought an injunction tostop an employers testing practices
The testing had a disproportionate adverse impact upon theemployees and was not shown to be related to jobperformance. Supervisors opinions were heavily weighted.
Supreme Court held the employer was not able to prove job
relatedness of its testing program throughout the entirerelationship between the employer and worker
Ethics: How would you use the opinions of knowledgeablesupervisors into the promotion policies in your own company?
21