c onnecting the dots to improve cyberlearning

51
Leyla Zhuhadar, Ph.D. Research Scientist, Office of Distance Learning, Western Kentucky University, USA. Adjunct Assistant Prof. CECS Dept., University of Louisville, USA. Connecting the Dots to Improve Cyberlearning Prepared for NSF Cyberlearning Research Summit in Washington, D.C. January 18, 2012.

Upload: nili

Post on 10-Jan-2016

21 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

C onnecting the Dots to Improve Cyberlearning. Leyla Zhuhadar , Ph.D . Research Scientist, Office of Distance Learning, Western Kentucky University, USA. Adjunct Assistant Prof. CECS Dept., University of Louisville , USA. Prepared for NSF Cyberlearning - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Leyla Zhuhadar, Ph.D.• Research Scientist , Office of Distance

Learning, Western Kentucky University, USA.

• Adjunct Assistant Prof. CECS Dept. , University of Louisville, USA.

Connecting the Dots to Improve Cyberlearning

Prepared for NSF Cyberlearning Research Summit in Washington, D.C. January 18, 2012.

Page 2: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

• Phil Long and George Siemens, 2008 (Penetrating the Fog)

“Learning analytics refers to the interpretation of a wide range of data produced by and gathered on behalf of students in order to assess academic progress, predict future performance, and spot potential issues.”

• The 1st International Conference on Learning and Analytics & Knowledge, 2011, in Banff, Alberta

“Learning analytics is the measurement, collection, analysis and reporting of data about learners and their contexts, for purposes of understanding and optimizing learning and the environment in which it occurs”

• Buckingham & Ferguson, KMI, Social Learning Analytics, 2011

1) Social learning network analysis, 2) Social learning discourse analysis, 3) Social learning content analysis, 4) Social learning disposition analysis, 5) Social learning context analysis.

Background (Social Learning Analytics):

Page 3: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

• Social Learning Content Analysis (Buckingham & Ferguson)• How can an overwhelming amount of information be easily

presented when it is stored in conceptual visualized matter?

• Why it is important to mimic the sequential extraction of information occurring in ecological vision (“top-down” cognitive representation) rather than using a holistic approach?

• Social Learning Netwotk Analysis (Buckingham & Ferguson)• How can we detect a community of similar Cyberlearners based on the

structure of a huge social network?

• How can we present this interconnection among communities visually to analyze our Cyberlearners’ behaviors?

• Finally, building a community-based recommendation system.

The Main Themes:

Page 4: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Cyberlearner and Open Source Platforms

Page 5: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

The current search mechanism used by popular search engines to find LRs uses “Keywords Search” for retrieving isolated educational

resources to “Episodic Memory” – or knowledge based on a particular concept. The semantic search

could be considered as finding interrelated concepts – what we call “Semantic Memory.”

Cyberlearner would be able to grasp multiple concepts and build what we call

“Mental Encyclopedia.”

Page 6: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

HyperManyMedia is aligned with the following ideas:

1. Technology enhanced learning: Open-source educational resources (any place, any time, and in any way)

2. Using state of the art data mining algorithms and Web services

3. Adopting a learner-centered pedagogical approach

4. Offering a mix of diverse content via Web 3.0.

5. Providing metadata, semantic, visualized, and cross-language searchable content.

Page 7: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Colliding Web Sciences

Page 8: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

HMM Architecture

Page 9: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 10: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 11: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 12: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 13: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 14: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 15: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 16: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

• This is great! But is our cognitive system able to deal with this vast amount of resources?

• The most difficult question raised here: “Is our conceptual recognition of these learning resources able to find what we really want?

Page 17: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

“Lexical access during speech perception can be successfully modeled as a process

mediated by identification of individual primitive elements, the phonemes from a small set of primitives (Wilsom, 1980).

We need only 44 phonemes to code all the words in English and 55 phonemes to

represent virtually all the words in all the languages spoken around the world

(Biederman, 1987).”

An Analogy between Speech and Visual Recognition

Page 18: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 19: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

1% 3%7%

12%

5%

6%

8%

58%

Cyberlearners' Preferences (2006-2011)

Generic Search Metadata SearchSemantic Search Personalized Semantic SearchPersonalized Search with User Relevance Feedback Collaborative FilteringCross-Language Search Visual Search

> 750,000 Cyberlearners

Page 20: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

We argue that mapping the hierarchical representation of

speech the way we visually categorize information can help

our Cyberlearners find what they are seeking!

An Analogy between Speech and Visual Recognition

Page 21: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Hierarchical Arrangement of:

An Analogy between Speech and Visual Recognition

Colleges (14)

Courses(60)

Resource(838)

Audio, Video, Lecture, RSS feed, Podcast, Vodcast, etc.

( >10,000)

Page 22: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

• We call this representation “top-down” cognitive representation.

• It starts with a knowledge driven by the Cyberlearner who knows what he/she is looking for.

• Visually finds his/her learning resource with three clicks!

The Power of Visual Recognition

Page 23: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 24: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 25: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

What is the HyperManyMedia Repository?

Page 26: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Reminder: Connectingthe Dots!I am a Cyberlearner and need help to find a learning resource!

But, I really don’t know what type of help I need!

Page 27: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Linking Social Networks with Recommender System: Who Are my Neighbors?

I am a Cyberlearner and need help to find a resource!

But I really don’t know what type of help I need!

Page 28: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

The Magic number of STM (7+/-2)

In 1956, George Miller discovered the magic number:

• 7 +/-2 = limited capacity of our Short Term Memory

• Digital span, letter span, and visual matrix

Page 29: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

The Magic number of STM (7+/-2)• Yes! We provided our

Cyberlearners with a semantic recommender system that gives them related resources to their search; but is this enough?

• Can I help our Cyberlearners to remember these learning resources by linking/relating them conceptually to other resources?

Page 30: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Searching for Answers?

But, how can we find this community with common• Learning domains,• Problems,• Interests, and• Learning styles?

Especially, when we have a system of thousands of resources and hundreds of thousands Cyberlearners navigating. We really need help!

Page 31: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Searching for Answers?

• Proposing a bottom-up approach (No pre-knowledge).

• Data-driven approach: archived activities of Weblogs for the last 6 years of Cyberlearners visited HMM (~750,000).

• Looking underneath the structure of HMM social networks.

Page 32: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

This graph represents a social network structure of a weblog (6 months logfile, 2011). ~8,000 Cyberlearners and ~24,000 (edges) connections among learners and resources in HMM.

Page 33: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!• Network with High Complexity

• Small world (Kleinberg, 2000)

• Mine the structure to of the network to answer the posed question

• Reminder! Simplistic approach (analogy between language and perception still holds)

• Modularity measurement was used to visualize the network structure.

; where represents the weight of the edge between i and j, = is the sum of the weights of the edges attached to vertex i, is the community to which vertex i is assigned, the δ-function δ(u, v) is 1 if u = v and 0 otherwise and m =.

Page 34: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

• Discovering the community of Cyberlearners; Each dot in this graph is a learner.

• 10 communities of learners with similarity (commonality).

• Of course the distribution among the number of dots ( Cyberlearners) varies; for the sake of simplicity, we assume they are equally distributed.

Page 35: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

• If I am a Cyberlearner, I definitely belong to one of these communities. Therefore, instead of being a dot among 8,000 dots, I am now a dot among 800 dots: Still it is a huge number

• If I need a recommendation, I don’t want to receive help from 800 Cyberlearners in my community!

Page 36: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

• Observing the graph (carefully): • Each Cyberlearner has a unique

distance from the hub. • A dot ahead is another learner (a

little bit more experienced with the resources in this domain - closer the hub).

• A dot behind is a learner less experienced.

• A learner very close to the hub could be considered an expert.

Page 37: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

1. Do we want to intimidate a Cyberlearner with an expert?

2. Or, do we provide the Cyberlearner with the learner closest to him/her?

distance-based = who has the most similar profile to him/her

Page 38: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

Our answer is neither one!

• We used another concept in cognitive psychology—Chunking Hypothesis.

• In 1978, Herbert Simon introduced the chunking hypothesis and won a Nobel Prize in economics. "for his pioneering research into the decision-making process within economic organizations" (1978).

Page 39: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Short Term Memory for Chess Positions

Page 40: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Conclusions

• Holding the concept of a primitive set and

the concept of chunking;

• Magic Number: Each Cyberlearner is recommended with resources he/she did not visit before from his/her closest 3 neighbors (triangle); and

• Chunking: those recommendations should range from 5 to 9 (no more).

Page 41: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

This graph represents a social network structure of a weblog (May-October 2011). ~8,000 Cyberlearners and ~24,000 (edges) connections among learners and resources in HMM.

Page 42: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

This graph represents a social network structure of a weblog (May-October 2011). ~8,000 Cyberlearners and ~24,000 (edges) connections among learners and resources in HMM.

Page 43: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

This graph represents a social network structure of a weblog (May-October 2011). ~8,000 Cyberlearners and ~24,000 (edges) connections among learners and resources in HMM.

Page 44: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Finding Community!

Ironically, the concept of triangles (triads) has proved to have the same properties of small world [Matthieu Laptapy, 2010]

Page 45: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Did We Connect the Dots? I am a Cyberlearner and

need help to find a resource!

But I really don’t know what type of help I need!

Page 46: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

I am a Cyberlearner and need help to find a resource!

But I really don’t know what type

of help I need!

Did We Connect the Dots?

Page 47: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

How?

Page 48: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Open, social learning Open Universities (UK, Germany, India, etc.) Open Courseware (MIT, Khan Academy, etc.) Large open online courses (Stanford: AI & ML)

The Future of Cyberlearners

Page 49: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Open, social learning Open Universities (Open Universities (UK, Germany,

India, etc.) Open Courseware (MIT, Khan Academy, etc.) Large open online courses ( Stanford: AI & ML)

Social Learning Analytics Social learning network analysis Social learning discourse analysis Social learning content analysis Social learning disposition analysis Social learning context analysis

The Future of Cyberlearners

Page 50: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

Thanks for your Attention!

Leyla Zhuhadar, Ph.D.Email: [email protected]

Page 51: C onnecting the Dots  to Improve  Cyberlearning

1. Simon Buckingham Sum and Rebecca Ferguson, Social Learning Analytics, Knowledge Media Institute, Social Learning Analytics, 2011.

2. Phil Long and George Siemens, Penetrating the Fog: Analytics in Learning and Education, 2008.

3. Small-World Phenomena and Decentralized Search: Kleinberg. Navigation in a Small World. Nature 406 (2000), 845.

4. Herbert Simon, The chunking hypothesis, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Simon, 2005.

5. Mattieu Latapy, Main-memory triangle computations for very large (sparse (power-law)) graphs, 2010.

References