c-pages bos meeting 10/26/10 · marina rachele franco october 8, 2010 san francisco board...
TRANSCRIPT
C-Pages – BOS Meeting 10/26/10
Petitions and Communications received from October 12, 2010, through October 18, 2010, for reference by the President to Committee considering related matters, or to be ordered filed by the Clerk on October 26, 2010. From Andrea O’Leary, submitting copy of letter sent to the Recreation and Park Commission regarding outreach issues. (1) From Aaron Goodman, submitting his concerns with the Parkmerced Project. (2) From concerned citizens, submitting support for the Parkmerced Project. File No. 100979, 5 letters (3) From Edith McMillan, submitting opposition to alterations to the Board of Supervisors' Legislative Chamber. File No. 101182, Copy: Each Supervisor (4) From Department of Public Health, submitting a letter from the Director, Environmental Health, requesting nomination of a restaurant in each district. Copy: Each Supervisor (5) From Real Estate Division, submitting a letter of receipt regarding the Japantown City Agency Work Group. Copy: Supervisor Mirkarimi (6) From Office of the Controller, submitting compliance audit of Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. Copy: Mayor, Each Supervisor, Budget Analyst, Civil Grand Jury and Public Library. (7) From City Administrator and Chair, Capital Planning Committee, submitting recommendations of the Capital Planning Committee on the issuance and sale of the earthquake safety and emergency response general obligation bond. (8) From Francisco Da Costa, submitting a link to an article regarding Lennar and Parcel A at Hunters Point Naval Shipyard. (9) From Francisco Da Costa, submitting a link to an article regarding the America's Cup. (10)
From James Carrigan, submitting information on Fire Station No. 2 double-parking on Powell Street during morning rush hour. (11) From Julie Eckardt, submitting a letter of support for the plan to allow Recology to transport materials from the City to Yuba County via rail hauling. File No. 101225 (12) From Department of the Environment, submitting an annual report for calendar years 2008-2009. (13) From Department of the Environment, submitting an annual report on the City's green purchasing program (14) From Robert Geshlider, submitting opposition to California Pacific Medical Center's Master Plan for St. Luke's Hospital and the new Cathedral Hill facility. (15) From Public Utilities Commission, requesting the calendaring of a release of reserve on the Public Utilities Commission Sustainable Energy Account Project CUH947. (16) From concerned citizens, submitting opinions on setting nutritional standards for restaurant food sold accompanied by toys or other youth focused incentive items. File No. 101096, 35 letters (17)
From Jim Toner, submitting opposition to setting nutritional standards for restaurant food sold accompanied by toys or other youth focused incentive items. File No. 101096 (18) From James Chaffee, submitting an article on the Ethics Commission and its recommendation of the President of the Library Commission’s conduct. 2 letters (19) From Bill Quan, submitting a letter recommending amending the enforcement and compliance procedures for nuisance. File No. 101062. (20)
From Real Estate Division, submitting a letter of receipt of Board of Supervisors inquiry regarding Japantown City Agency Work Group. (21) From Fior d’ Italia, submitting Cowboy Bob’s Bum Report regarding Board of Supervisors’ legislation verses the homeless issues in San Francisco. (22) From Office of the Controller, submitting the September monthly overtime report. (23) From Axis of Love, submitting a release regarding Axis of Love’s protest of the issuance of a violation against a social service/non-profit. (24) From Katherine Howard, Golden Gate Park Preservation Alliance, submitting a letter regarding Westside Recycled Water Treatment Plant. (25) From the Airport Commission, submitting a report on concession audit of Host International, Inc. (26) From Judith Berkowitz, Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods, submitting a letter regarding resolution to the proposed construction of the Westside Water Treatment Plant in Golden Gate Park. (27)
From:To:Cc:
Date:SUbject:Sent by:
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Fw: Outreach issue hon,inni;nno
[email protected]@sfgov.org"Sunnyside Park Famiiies & Neighbors" <[email protected]>, "Friends of SunnysideConservatory.org" <[email protected]>, "Board of Supervisors, Clerk"<[email protected]>10/13/2010 09:13 PMOutreach Issue [email protected]
Dear Commissioners:Re: OUTREACH POLICYI will reserve my final views on the issue of RPD "Outreach" to the public when all theinformation surfaces.
My experience in discovery of the currently situation:• I learned from the SFGTV broadcasting of your Oct. 7 meeting that the current Outreach
Policy was presented to you in July; I went searching for it on-line.• The issue was on the July 15, 2010 Agenda but there were NO Supporting Documents for
it.• I got lucky - there was a transcript of meeting notes which I am now trying to decipher
and digest.My impressions from the Oct. 7 meeting:
• Ms. Ballard confirmed that it is the intent of Dept. staff to get something done as quicklyas possible and to be done with it.
• She made no mention that it is better to get it right rather than get it done.• Her interest was more about what date you would "pass" (early Nov.) whatever she
brought to you rather than making sure it had comprehensive vetting and was broadlyacceptable - otherwise, it would be a failure and you will hear no end to it. You all saidthe issue was "too important" and I'm not convinced she heard you.
• Not providing you with a complete file of the issue for review before the issue isdiscussed should remind you that the public has even less access to the properinformation and certainly would not have the opportunity to provide thoughtful feedback;reliance on conjecture when facts aren't available.
• The outreach to park advocacy that was mentioned (NPC, SFPT, others?) cannot beconsidered broad consensus from even the most involved of "stakeholders." Many, if notmost, advocacy groups do not align themselves with either of these organizations andfrom personal experience, these folks, while sincere in their intentions, have had littleexperience in the trials and tribulations neighborhood park advocacy groups havelived-through with community consensus-building and Dept. resistances. Neither of themput out anything that I saw asking the rest of us what we thought or what our priorities,concerns, and experiences are - and some groups I work with have fiscal accounts withthem so there was no excUse not to reach-out to everyone. This is bad outreach in itself.
• My greatest fear, as is with all these hearings: Whatever community outreach Ms.
Ballard might do to solicit broader input, sounds like none, it typically occurs the weekbefore the Commission meeting when it will be heard. This is TOO LATE for people tosend you correspondence on the issue and for it to get into your packets in time so thatyou can review it for consideration. They say they had a community meeting on the issuewhen the truth is that it only demonstrates an appearances ofinclusion when it's very farfrom that.
MY SUGGESTION: Get at least the Oct. 30 SF Quadrant Commission community meetingunder your belt and hold at least one more discovery meeting out in The City where the issue isaddressed directly WITH the public before addressing it at an official monthly hearing. Then donot vote to pass anything the first go- 'round . Give the public every opportunity to respondotherwise it will forever be labeled as a throat-stuffer.
There will never be complete agreement, but there should be clarity about HOW we got wherewe ultimately end up.
Better to not be stuck with another meaningless and not-enforced/able policy.
Thanks,Andrea O'Leary
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Fw: [Parkmerced - destruction of open-space prior to any DEIR final comments/responses]
"'"'_~~~""'=""~_'="''''~~~''_'"'~~~'~''~'"'''"~~~''"''""'''''''~'''''''''~'''_~""'"~"""'."'''';_.'_=_"""_""_~=~"'~__"""='N""~'_'~·'~'.''''''~~.•''"~",''=~'"_='_~-""~~~_""""_=~,,","'~,,~"'~_,,,~_~~,~m~''''_
From:To:Cc:Date:Subject:
Aaron Goodman <[email protected]>[email protected]@sfgov.org10/14/201001:48 PM[Parkmerced - destruction of open-space prior to any DEJR final comments/responses]
Board of Supervisors
I noted the article in the SFSU-CSU Xpress on the initial start date of Oct2l st forthe utilities project of the future Creative Arts Center build-out on the prior open-spacesite of Parkmerced residents/tenants. It is highly troubling that the CSU~SFSU Masterplan"utilities" project is being allowed to go forward prior to any adequate Historical ResourcesAnalysis being finalized or approved on the Parkmerced project. The SFSU-CSU MasterplanEIR and the Parkmerced "vision" EIR both IGNORE the others property and the OVERALLmasterplanned community of Parkmerced as a national register eligible site. The open-spacewas left in a deteriorated state post the SFSU-CSU purchase, with only the softball field(due to title 9 requirements) was maintained by the university. The university has left the siteas a dumping grounds for construction projects, and ignored the prior use as aCOMMUNITY CENTER for residents ofParkmerced, and prior Montessori School site location.This is a LOSS OF USE to tenants that was inadequately notified to residents upon its sale, andbartered for a club-house rennovation and landscape work that was again shoddy and improperlydocumented by prior ownership, and documented by tenant advocates Genevieve Callejo andLora Traveller as improper pass-throughs at the Rent Board. The SFSU-CSU Foundations useof money for expansionistic projects without adequate review of their impacts or "fair-share"fees assessed per City of Marina vs. CSU on the open-space, and housing is critical to belooked at in the MOU negotiated prior.
This space is critical open-space area for the density of housing and was planned as akey ammenity for residents along with the SFUSD site school, commercial area, andsouthern planted area along brotherhood way. It is impossible to turn back the clock,but essential as city representatives to look at this issue closely in how the dual developmentshave circumvented CEQA and adequate analysis and review of the impacts on Parkmerced.
The pipeline project hides a more serious issue of lack of ANY information on the futureproposed Creative Arts Center, its size, scale, impact, and costs to students and thecommunity. The SFSU Masterplan did not indicate if room was available for tenants ofParkmerced for meeting rooms, or if there was any open-space to remain post construction.
I seriously ask how would any of you like to see a building the size of the SFMOMAdumped in your backyard or local park space. It does not take a rocket scientist tosee that this effort is inappropriate at this stage of the Parkmerced development and
ErR process with upcoming hearings on Nov. 18th and there is a need to seriouslyquestion ANY work on this site due to the preservation issues involved until there isan adequate and thorough analysis of the overall Parkmerced outline and the impactsJOlNTLY of the SFSU-CSU Masterplan and Parkrnerced Vision project.
Sincerely
Aaron [email protected]
--- On Thu, 10114110, [email protected] <[email protected]> wrote:
From: [email protected] <[email protected]>Subject: Golden Gate [X]press : Construction for new Creative Arts Center to begin Oct. 21To: [email protected], [email protected]: Thursday, October 14,2010,12:58 PM
http://xpress.sfsu.edu/archives/news/O15485.htm1
This message was sent by [email protected] via http://addthis.com. Please note that AddThisdoes not verify email addresses.
Make sharing easier with the AddThis Toolbar: http://www.addthis.com/go/too1bar-em
Marina Rachele Franco
October 8, 2010
San Francisco Board of SupervisorsSan Francisco City HallI Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244San Francisco, California 94102
RE: Support the Parkmerced Vision Project
Dear Honorable Members ofthe San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
This letter is to encourage youto support the Parkmerced Vision Project. This importantproject will improve the housing quality of San Francisco. I have been a resident of SanFrancisco for over fifteen years, and grew up on the Peninsula. I have seen the city gothrough it myriad of changes and growth over the years, and know that cities must adaptto thrive.
Parkmerced's current inefficient and outdated units and layout are at the end of theiruseful life. Parkmerced's proposal to improve the housing supply and redevelop theproperty into new, energy efficient units will be a benefit to the goal of sustainablehousing for San Francisco.
The quality oflife for Parkmerced residents and the neighborhood will improve as thenew project will result in better public transit, as well as attracting new retail and socialservices to the area. I understand that current residents who will be temporarily displacedhave been offered new and better units at the same rents by Parkmerced management, aswell as continued protection under rent control, lessening any short-tenn inconveniences.
The Parkmerced Vision Project will increase quality housing for all of San Francisco, aswell as revitalize the Lake Merced neighborhood. I support the Parkmerced VisionProject, and I strongly encourage the Board to suppOli the pro· as well.
Sincerely,
Mftv,\~Marina Franco
Susan Sanl?;iacomod'""-J Uu C~~c- f""'1<:-~UM~
October 6, 2010
San Francisco Board of SupervisorsSan Francisco City Hall1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Re: The Parkmerced Vision Project
To the San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
I am writing in support ofthe Parkmerced Vision project. As a native SanFranciscan who grew up and continues to live near the West Portal area, I wouldlove to see the Parkmerced area redeveloped.
The Parkmerced Vision will be providing a once-in-a lifetime opportunity totransform an agilfg housing complex and the surrounding area into a vibrantneighborhood not only for locals/natives such as myself but more importantly forthe Residents. For those Residents who live in apartments slated for replacement,Management will provide onsite, replacement, rent-controlled units.
The proposed project will improve energy and water efficiency, unit layout,handicap accessibility and overall Resident comfort. The project will alsoencourage non-motorized transit by bringing in local retail and services, beginninga bicycle sharing network, implementing a new multi-use paths to connectParkmerced to surrounding neighborhoods, and coordinating the re-routing ofpublic transportation. These improvements will improve the quality of life forResidents in Parktnerced and cityWide.
The Parkmerced Vision project will create a Resident oriented community thatreflects the richness of San Francisco's cultural diversity and the city's commitmentto social and economic equity. I fully support the project and urge you to do thesame.
Sincerely,
Susan Sangiacomo
Serving OJlr COIJl1IIJmity
Lrc",,) U~ Coi~
(l -'1 Ci..1 e.(~Clebrating our diverse faiths andspiritual traditions,
the San Francisco Interfaith Council
brings people together to build understanding and serve our coml!J!Jnity.
Octob i1s, 2~o"--I
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
do Angela Calvilo (Clerk of the Board of Supervisors)
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place ':7 0 /! .
City Hall, Room 244 ~''14
San Francisco, CA 94102-4689 ,'*" rr;.[J j .
As Executive Director of the San Francisco Interfaith Council, I have had the
opportunity to work with the owners and managers at Parkmerced for
several years. It is my experience that Parkmerced has been a committed
and effective partner with the entire Brotherhood Way Community of
religious and scholastic institutions.
Dear San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
~7§~J~;~~~~a:sb"'_-Executive Director '.
Representatives'bf Parkmerced sat on the first Brotherhood Way Community
Cbi)1):tfit~ee'thatplanned and presented an event commemorating the
September 11,2001 tragedy in New York. They have participated in and
sYI?R~r~~cb~,~~~r~l~v~~~~~toSt~h?,\l'\asMW~Ch~rchw;d StThomas More
Scli'ool,' Most'receritly they were-irihrumeritaf'iri (btt'ob'eY2009 for providing
~()gistic:s forthe SFIC/Brot~~rh()()dYVayAssociation's 20th Anniversary
Observimce ofthe LomaPri~tat\rrtl1quake, held in conjunction with the SF
Interfaith CROP/Hunger Walk; the latter financially benefitting the efforts of
internation'al humanitarian aid organizations and the City's Interfaith Winter
Shelter for Homeless Men. They will also be paithers' in this charity walk
around Lake Merced on October 24,2010. (look forward to an ever
expanding relationship with Parkmerced and view their comprehensive
planning efforts as leading the, way for a renewal of the Brotherhood Way
community along with the entire vvestsideqf San Francikb.
I believe implementing Parkmerced's vision will contribute to the
betterment of the community by providing much needed housing,
transpor,tation improvements and stronger community.Parkmerted has
shown in both word ahd action that iswholly connected to and in support
Qftbespiritual a,n.d~ducational ()rgani.z:etic)J1saldng Bro~herhobd Way and
bYextef1si6h;-~hewHoj~'o(Sa:tiFr~fjtisco: .": ':0.' Y .
" . :~". '"t·;t...·~: _~Ut .::;/,;. ~_. L; :......\::, ..< .. '.f);::·,·;.;';'··' \ ; n:."'~ .~.;
"","...\ e·c-"'~'<·-:~."'~",:' .•- ....<_.,.,.-,\ ...... ".~ ;•. ,-,Lc" ,..,-. ..• _,' ~.,_ •.._,....... >.~".~',__ ...,. ,'., ..... 1.. . , ..~
1l'l'f("sd'-"'6rt'l'afRfflert€ct'g--rtan~'a!fd 'lif'e' '08'-te~--" 'Ove·'iL"j .,,31- ;nt;, \rq!'.!!,
,ng,~'cl;';~-G.,-.n'C,S'i,.fiH'i' "\' .:,P.\F(\l,>c\j', )",?",{ C:i"',.c~Pp[,q .LF .;cu..:u jt'jmc
"',~~~t;~;~Yfr?&;~';'~rn:~~~'~.' :.:u"1
Bringing people togetherto bidEd IlIldersfmulillg
-•..-··.i;.:.-:: ...-.·..
&elebratillg Ol/r diverse fittt1JSand spiritual traditions
po Box 29055San Francisco, CA 94129
ph: 415.474.1321
www.sf·interfaith.org
Michael G, Pappas, M.Div.Executive Director
Board of Directors:
Rev. James DeLange, Chair$t.Francis Lutheran Church
Rita R. Semel, Executive Vice-Chair
Congregation Emanu-ElFrances Jolms, Secretary
Calvary Presbyterian Church
Ron Dudum, Chief Financial Officer
Eastern OrthodoxJerusafem Patriarchy
Abby Michelson Porth, Program Chair
Congregation llmanu-ef
Nessa AdamoSan Francisco CARD
Rev, Amos BrownThird Baptist Chtu'ch
Sister Cbandru DesaiBrahma Kumarls Center
Rev. Paul ChaffeeInterfaith Center at The I'residio
Rev, Eli7..abeth EkdaleSf. Mark's Lutheran Church
Iftekhar HaiUnitedft1usumsofAmerica
G.L HodgeProvidence Baptist Church
Rev, Charles KullmannOld Sf. Mary's Calholic Church
Rev. John Oda,Pine United Methodist Church
Rev. P. Gerard O'RourkeArchdiocese ofSan Francisco
Rabbi Stephen Pearce
Congregation Emanu·EI
Lois PeacockZion Lutheran Church
Marilyn SanerChurch ofThe lneama/ion (lipiseopal)
Rev, Mark StangerGrace Cathedral Epl:~copal Church
Rev. Laird StuartCalvary Presbyterian Church
Rev. John TalcsforeThe Cathedral q(St. MOlY
October 6, 2010
San Francisco Board of SupervisorsCity Hall1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244San Francisco, CA 94102-4689
Dear Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
Suf~nu. fDOC; 7q
qo~
I am a lifelong resident and voter in San Francisco and wish to inform you of my strong support for theParkmerced Vision project.
Parkmerced's proposal to redevelop the outdated housing stock in the Southwest boarder of our city will bea welcome addition that will improve the neighborhood, encourage non-automobile transportation, andimprove the quality of life for those who live there and in the surrounding area.
I urge you to support this important and well planned project.
Sincerely,
Mwoo
1
RECE!VEDBOARD OF SUn:RVISORS
SMJ FR,~NClscn
2010 oct 13 PM 3: 05
:y ,£\i.e
October 8,2010
San Francisco Board of SupervisorsSan Francisco City HallI Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place, Room 244San Francisco, California 94102
fiE: Support the Parkmerced Vision Project
Dear Honorable Members of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
This letter is to encourage you to support the Parkmerced Vision Project. This importantproject will improve the housing quality of San Francisco. I have been a resident of SanFrancisco for over twelve years, and grew up on the Peninsula. I have seen the city gothrough a myriad of changes and growth over the years, and know that cities must adaptto thrive.
Parkmerced's current inefficient and outdated units and layout are at the end of theiruseful life. Parkmerced's proposal to improve the housing supply and redevelop theproperty)nto new, energy efficient units will be a benefit to the goal of sustainablehousing for San Francisco.
The quality oflife for Parkmerced residents and the neighborhood will improve as thenew project will result in better public transit, as well as attracting new retail and socialservices to the area. I understand that current residents who will be temporarily displacedhave been offered new and better units at the same rents by Parkmerced management, aswell as continued protection under rent control, lessening an; short-term inconveniences.
The Parkmerced Vision Project will increase quality housing for all of San Francisco, aswell as revitalize the Lake Merced neighborhood. I support the Parkmerced VisionProject, and I strongly encourage the Board to suppOli the project as well.
Anna Maria Franco
From:To:Cc:
Date:Subject:
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Restaurant Appreciation Month - Need BOS nominations by October 14th
Paula Jones/DPH/SFGOVBoard of Supervisors/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOVLinShao Chin/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Les Hilger/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, VictorLim/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Catherine Rauschuber/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, KatyTang/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Cammy Blackstone/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, CatherineStefanilBOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Bill Barnes/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, RickGalbreath/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Vallie Brown/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, JeremyPoliockiBOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Tom Jackson/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, AprilVeneracion/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Olivia Scanlon/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, AlexanderVolberding/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Boe Hayward/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, AlexRandolph/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Sheila Chung Hagen/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, JonLau/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Alice Guidry/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, RaquelRedondieziBOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, Frances Hsieh/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, ReginaDick-EndrizzilMAYORISFGOV@SFGOV, Lisa O'Malley/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV, RichardLee/DPH/SFGOV@SFGOV, Angela Calvilio/BOS/SFGOV@SFGOV, [email protected]/08/2010 02:29 PMRestaurant Appreciation Month - Need BOS nominations by October 14th
Dear Members of the Board of Supervisors and staff:
Please find attached a letter from Rajiv Bhatia, Director of Environmental Health, requesting that younominate a restaurant in your district you would like to recognize with a Certificate of Honor at 3:30 pm onOctober 26th at the Board of Supervisors meeting.
To ensure that all of the restaurants are in compliance with health and safety, labor, and business licenserequirements, each of the nominated restaurants will each be screened with DPH, OSLE, and the TaxCollector. For this reason, please proVide us with your top three choices.
Also attached is a nomination form. Please complete the nomination form and return it to me by October14th. We will screen the nominations and provide you with a final list no later than October 19th.
If you have any questions, please call me at 415-252-3853 or email me at: [email protected].
Thank you for your assistance!
~Restaurant Appreciation BOS .pdf
Restaurant .Appreciation Nomination Form .dot
Paula
Paula JonesDirector of Food SystemsSan Francisco Department of Public Health (Environmental Health Section)PhD Candidate - University of California, Santa Cruz (Environmental Studies Department)c/o 1390 Market Street, Suite 822San Francisco, CA 94102(415) 252-3853 phone
Amy L. EmIYIIDirector ofReal Estate
MEMORANDUMOctober 12,2010
Citya,nd County of San Fra'ncisco
REAL ESTATE DIvisION
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Angela CalvilloClerk of the Board
f1 .-/J ~~J'---Amy 1. BroWn~ A-I (Director of Real Estate
Japantown City Agency Work GroupStaff ContactReference No. 20101005-008
I am in receipt of your letter dated October 8, 2010, relative to Reference No. 20101005-008. Pleasebe advised that Amy Brown, Director of Real Estate, will be the cOI1tact on behalf of the Real EstateDivision to participate in the Jatantown City Agency Work Group to assist in coordiI1ating effOltsbetween the City, consultants and the community on the PIaIming Department's Japantown BetterNeighborhoods Plan.
cc: Supervisor Mirkarimi
i:\malll'lgers\admin ab\bos ref 2010IOOS-OOB.doc
Office of the Director of Real Estate 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 400 • Sail Francisco, CA 94102(415) 554-9850 • FAX: (415) 552-9216
AIRPORT COMMISSION:
Compliance Audit ofHawaiian Airlines, Inc.
October 13, 2010
CONTROLLER'S OFFICECITY SERVICES AUDITOR
The City Services Auditor was created within the Controller's Office through an amendment to theCity Charter that was approved by voters in November 2003. Under Appendix F to the City Charter,the City Services Auditor has broad authority for:
• Reporting on the level and effectiveness of San Francisco's public services andbenchmarking the city to other public agencies and jurisdictions.
• Conducting financial and performance audits of city departments, contractors, and functionsto assess efficiency and effectiveness of processes and services.
• Operating a whistleblower hotline and website and investigating reports of waste, fraud, andabuse of city resources.
• Ensuring the financial integrity and improving the overall performance and efficiency of citygovernment.
The audits unit conducts financial audits, attestation engagements, and performance audits. Financialaudits address the financial integrity of both city departments and contractors and provide reasonableassurance about whether financial statements are presented fairly in all material aspects inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Attestation engagements examine, review,or perform procedures on a broad range of subjects such as internal controls; compliance withrequirements of specified laws, regulations, rules, contracts, or grants; and the reliability ofperformance measures. Performance audits focus primarily on assessment of city services andprocesses, providing recommendations to improve department operations.
We conduct our audits in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards pUblished by the U.S.Government Accountability Office (GAO). These standards require:
• Independence of audit staff and the audit organization.• Objectivity of the auditors performing the work.• Competent staff, including continuing professional education.1. Quality control procedures to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the auditing
standards.
Audit Tearn: Paige Alderete, Audit Manager
Vivian Chu, Associate Auditor
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben RosenfieldController
Monique ZmudaDeputy Controller
October 13, 2010
San Francisco Airport CommissionP.O. Box 8097San Francisco International AirportSan Francisco, CA 94128
President, Members, and Director Martin:
John L. Martin, DirectorP.O. Box 8097San Francisco International AirportSan Francisco, CA 94128
The Controller's Office, City Services Auditor (CSA), presents its report concerning the audit ofHawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian). Hawaiian has an airline operating permit from the AirportCommission of the City and County of San Francisco (City) to use the landing facilities at SanFrancisco International Airport (SFO) for its air transportation business.
Reporting Period: JUly 1, 2008, through June 30, 2010
Fees Paid: $707,297
Results:
Hawaiian reported 744 revenue aircraft landings to the Airport Department (Airport) for the auditperiod but overreported two revenue aircraft landings in June 2010. Hawaiian incorrectlyreported the aircraft type for 16 revenue aircraft landings in August 2009 and two revenueaircraft landings in January 2010. As a net result of these errors, Hawaiian overpaid $1,307 inlanding fees to the Airport.
The responses from the Airport and Hawaiian are attached to this report. The Controller'sOffice, City Services Auditor, will work with the Airport to follow up on the status of therecommendations made in this report.
Respectfully submitted,
0t~~Tonia LedijuDirector of Audits
cc: MayorBoard of SupervisorsBudget AnalystCivil Grand JuryPublic Library
415-554-7500 City Hall 0 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place· Room 316· San Francisco CA 94102-4694 FAX 415-554-7466
Page intentionally left blank.
INTRODUCTION
Audit Authority
Background
Scope and Methodology
The Office of the Controller (Controller) has authority underthe San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 10, Article1, Section 10.6-2 to audit, at regular intervals, all leases ofCity-owned real property where rent of $100,000 or more ayear is to be paid to the City. In addition, the City Charterprovides the Controller, City Services Auditor (CSA), withbroad authority to conduct audits. This audit was conductedunder that authority and pursuant to an audit plan agreed toby the Controller and the Airport Department (Airport).
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) has an airline operatingpermit (permit) from the Airport Commission (Commission)of the City to use the landing facilities at San FranciscoInternational Airport (SFO) for its air transportationbusiness. The permit, which commenced on May 1,1997,requires Hawaiian to submit to the Airport a monthly reportshowing Hawaiian's actual revenue aircraft landings byaircraft type and other landing data necessary to calculatethe landing fees. The Airport charges Hawaiian a landingfee based on the maximum landing weight of its revenueaircraft landings at SFO. These landings are those forwhich Hawaiian has received or made a monetary fee orcharge. For every 1,000 pounds of aircraft landed, theCommission sets a fee that it may change annually. Duringthe audit period, the Airport's fee per 1,000 pounds was$3.00 for fiscal year 2008-09, and $3.15 for fiscal year2009-10.
The purpose of this audit was to determine whetherHawaiian complied with the reporting and paymentprovisions of its permit. The audit covered the period fromJuly 1, 2008, through June 30, 2010.
The audit team conducted this audit by:
• Examining the applicable terms of Hawaiian's permitand the adequacy of its procedures for recording,summarizing, and reporting revenue aircraftlandings.
• Testing whether Hawaiian accurately reported itsrevenue aircraft landings and the maximum landingweights of its aircrafts that landed at SFO.
1
2
• Verifying whether Hawaiian had any outstandinglanding fee payments due to the Airport for the auditperiod.
This performance audit was conducted in accordance withgenerally accepted government auditing standards. Thesestandards require planning and performing the audit toobtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide areasonable basis for findings and conclusions based on theaudit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtainedprovides a reasonable basis for our findings andconclusions based on our audit objectives.
AUDIT RESULTS
Hawaiian AirlinesOverpaidIts Landing Fees by$1,307
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) reported 744 revenueaircraft landings, for which it paid $707,297 in landingfees to the Airport for the period from July 1, 2008,through June 30, 2010.
Due to errors in preparing monthly reports to the Airport,Hawaiian overreported two revenue aircraft landings inJune 2010. Hawaiian also incorrectly reported theaircraft type for 16 revenue aircraft landings in August2009 and two revenue aircraft landings in January 2010.As a net result of these errors, Hawaiian overpaid $1,307in landing fees to the Airport.
The exhibits below show Hawaiian's reported landingsand fees paid (Exhibit 1) and the calculation of theoverpaid landing fees (Exhibit 2) based on the number ofaudited landings.
EXHIBIT 1 Number of Reported Landings and Landing Fees PaidJuly 1, 2008, Through June 30, 2010
July 1, 2008 through June 30, 2009
july 1,2009 through June 30, 2010
Total
371
373
744
115,320,000
114,710,000
230,030,000
$3.00
3.15
$345,960
361,337
$707,297
Source: Airport reports on landing fees and aircraft landings.
3
EXHIBIT 2 Calculation of Net Overpaid Landing FeesJuly 1, 2008, Through June 30, 2010
June 2010320,000 13 11 2 $3.15 $2,016
8767·300 ER
January 2010295,000 10 9 1 3.15 929
8767·300
January 2010320,000 22 23 (1 ) 3.15 (1,008)
8767·300 ER
Augusl2009295,000 20 12 8 3.15 7,434
8767·300
Augusl2009320,000 12 20 (8) 3.15 (8,064)
8767·300 ER
Total 77 75 2 $1,307
Source: Auditor's analysis of the Airport's reports on landing fees and aircraft landings.
Recommendations:
4
The Airport should:
1. Refund $1,307 to Hawaiian for its overpaid landingfees in the audit period.
2. Require Hawaiian to report the correct number oflandings on each Monthly Air Traffic Activity Report,as required by the permit.
ATTACHMENT A: AIRPORT'S RESPONSE
September 29. 2010
~1~"O~'
c<"''''''~~'O"
IU""lh',nm'v
Ms. Tonia LedijuDirector of AuditsCity Hall, Room J 16I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94 t02
Subject:
Dear Tonia;
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc,
,,,.... , ",.~".,
'''m·,'~I,''''f' j',"
The Airport agrees on the audit findings to credit Hawaiian AirJines, Jnc.("Hawaiian") for the ovetpayment of its landings fees in the amount of$I,307.00.Furthermore, the Airport will advise Hawaiian to review its records thoroughly when
reporting future aircraft landings to prevent such discrepancies from occurring again.
[fyou have any questions, please feel free to can me at (650) 821~4530.
:LLDan RavinaSenior Property ManagerAviation Management
Attachment
A-1
AUDIT RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESPONSES
Responsible,,~~ .......~. Agency
__.._'n,."
The Airport should:
1. Refund $1,307 to Hawaiian for its overpaid Airport Airport concurs on the recommendation to credit Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. for
landing fees in the audit period. $1,307 for the overpayment of landing fees.
2. Require Hawaiian to report the correct Airport Airport concurs with the recommendation, and will advise Hawaiian to report the
number of landings on each Monthly Air correct numbers of landings on each Monthly Air Traffic Report, as required byTraffic'Activity Report, as required by the the permit.permit.
A-2
ATTACHMENT B: HAWAIIAN AIRLINES' RESPONSE
HAWAIIAN-f1IRUnES.-
October 6 20I0
Ms. Tonia LedijuDirector of AuditsCity Hall, Room 316I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
RE: Compliance Audit ofHawaiian Airlines, Inc.
Dear Tonia,
Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. (Hawaiian) agrees with the findings of the audit as we held a concurrentreview and found similar findings. As a result, we sent revised MATAR for the month(s) found tohave discrepancies and payments/credits subsequently processed.
Furthermore, to address the weakness detected in our reporting which resulted in these errors HA. (Hawaiian) has adopted a practice of a secondary verification process whereby another manager willcheck the accuracy of the information reported.
If there are any questions, please feel free to contact me.
Best regards,
Tasha EldridgeHawaiian Airlines - SFOStation [email protected]
B-1
RECEIVI=D
Capital Planning8~gl~~i~~s2010 OCT I 3 PM 3: I5
~::>'> . 1/
~
B+F e.-feAJ
c-pa.~
Edwin M. Lee, City Administrator, Chair
MEMORANDUMBY__.LA~k:...-__
Recommendation:
October 12, 2010
To: Supervisor David Chiu, Board President "
From: Edwin M. Lee, City Administrator and Capital Planning CommitteeChair~Copy: Members of the Board of Supervisors
Angela Calvillo, Clerk of the BoardCapital Planning Committee
Regarding: Recommendations of the Capital Planning Committee on the Issuance and Saleof the Earthquake Safety and Emergency Response General Obligation Bond
In accordance with Section 3.21 ofthe Administrative Code, on October 4, 2010, the CapitalPlanning Committee (CPC) finalized its recommendations on the following items. TheCPC's recommendations are set forth below as well as a record of the members present.
1. Board File Number 101255, Resolutions authorizing the issuance of up to101256 & 101248 $412,300,000 of Earthquake Safety & Emergency
Response General Obligation Bonds and the sale ofup to $85,000,000 of Earthquake Safety &Emergency Response General Obligation Bonds;Ordinance appropriating up to $85,000,000 to DPWand SFPUC to begin work upon the receipt ofrevenue from the sale of bonds.
The CPC recommends approval of both resolutionsand the appropriation of funds. The Committeeamended the original agenda item to include theappropriation ordinance.
Comments: The CPC recommends approval of these items by avote of lO-O.
Committee members or representatives in favorinclude Judson True, Board President's Office; EdHarrington, San Francisco Public UtilitiesCommission; Ben Rosenfield, Office ofthe Controller;Amy Brown, City Administrator; Ed Reiskin,Department of Public Works; Brad Benson, Port ofSan Francisco; Darton Ito, San Francisco MunicipalTransportation Agency; Dawn Kamalanathan,Recreation and Parks Department; Cindy Nichol, SanFrancisco International Airport; and Rick Wilson,Mayor's Budget Office.
BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,To:Cc:Bcc:Subject: Lennar and its dubious on Parcel A at the Hunters Point Shipyard.
From:To:Date:Subject:
Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>10108/201007:40 AMLennar and its dubious ploys on Parcel A at the Hunters Point Shipyard.
Lennar and its dubious ploys on Parcel Aat Hunters Point Naval Shipyard:
http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/10/08/18660896.php
Francisco Da Costa
From:To:Date:Subject:
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Fw: The America's Cup a pie in the sky.
Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>Francisco Da Costa <[email protected]>10/12/201002:13 PMThe America's Cup a pie in the sky.
The America's Cup a pie in the sky:
http://www.franciscodacosta.org/articles/oped165.html
Francisco Da Costa
From:To:Date:SUbject:
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: SFFD solves double-parked private vehicles of firefighter in front of Station 2, but still
manage to clog traffic in Chinatown.
JAMES CORRIGAN <[email protected]>[email protected]/2010 11 :24 AMSFFD soives double-parked private vehicies of firefighter in front of Station 2, but still manage toclog traffic in Chinatown.
October 9, 2010 8:10 A.M.
Dear Board of Supervisors:S.F. Firefighters have long been able to double-park on Powell St. during the morning rush hour.However, after DPT saw the video of doubie-parked, FF cars on Powell St.,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9 ouofPdG7kto avoid embarrassment, warned Station 2 firefighters they would be ticketed in the future.The bumor is how Chief Hayes-White and Station 2 fight back to this challenge ofDPT treatingfirefighters like everyone else.Now, early in the morning, Station #2 pull the Engine, Truck and Chiefs car from the firehouse andpark them in a traffic lane and use the entire firehouse as a parking lot where the private vehicles can'tbe ticketed.And, as you know, emergency equipment can park anywhere they want even if they obstruct traffic.Free parking for firefighters still outweighs the free flow of traffic in San Francisco.Jim Corrigan
1/
~ ~bg_pattern.jpg bg_letler.jpg
October 11, 2010
Office of the San Francisco Board of Supervisors1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceCity Hall, Room 244San Francisco, Ca. 94102-4689
Dear San Francisco Board of Supervisors:
As a member of the Yuba-Sutter community, I want to express my support of the plan to allowRecology to transport materials from the City of San Francisco to Yuba County via rail hauling.I believe both counties and the residents would benefit in numerous ways.
I trust the integrity of Recology and believe the environment and protecting the areassurrounding Ostrom Road Landfill are a top priority for their leadership. The concept has beenstudied and appropriate measures have been put into place to ensure safety.
For Yuba County, a "yes" vote will prOVide a huge economic boost to our community. Thecounty suffers from poor economics, minimal job opportunities and a lack of governmentservices to meet the population's needs. Over the life of the contract, host fees totaling $22million will go into the county's general fund to help pay for fire departments, law enforcementand general county improvements.
I respectfully urge you to support Recology's proposal to transport materials from San Franciscoto Yuba County by way of rail hauling. San Francisco wins...Yuba County wins...the environmentwins!
Best Regards,
CJ~Julie Eckardt25 Year Resident of the Yuba-Sutter Community
San Francisco Department of the EnvironmentIntegrated Pest Management Program Report
Combined years 2006 and 2007
San Francisco Department of the EnvironmentIntegrated Pest Management Program
ANNUAL REPORT 2008-2009Covering pesticide use data and program activities for calendar years 2008 and 2009
Chris Geiger, Ph.D.Integrated Pest Management Program Manager
IntroductionChapter 3, Section 305(g) of the Environment Code (Integrated Pest Management Ordinance) requires San Francisco'sDepartment of Environment (SFE) to report on the progress of its Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Program to the Boardof Supervisors. This report is submitted to fulfill that requirement, and summarizes the progress made by San Francisco'sIPM Program, analysis of pesticide use data, and specific information on the City's departments doing most of the pestcontrol on City property from January 2008 through December 2009..
Key Accomplishments 2008·09• Organized San Francisco Facility Managers' Training 4/1/08• Organized 1ih Annual San Francisco Urban IPM Conference 1/23/09 - Full attendance (241
people). Theme: Invasive Species and IPM• Attended NationallPM Symposium 3/26/09; organized session on pest prevention in green
buildings• Organized "IPM Idea Olympics" event 9/10109 - Revisioning and strategic planning for San
Francisco's IPM Program• Organized 19 monthly meetings of the IPM Technical Advisory Committee; attendance at each
ranged from 15-45 people. Most meetings featured speakers andlor trainings and continuingeducation credits.
• Organized annual weed flaming training (2008) and IPMIPesticide Safety Trainings (2008 and2009). The latter were attended by all City pest management personnel.
• Rolled out the new web-based Pesticide Use Reporting System (PURS) database, beginning1/1/10.
• Maintained the City's Reduced-Risk Pesticides list. Held two special meetings annually toupdate the list, plus a presentation to the Commission on the Environment.
• Held annual pUblic hearings to enable departments to justify use of non-listed pesticides orpesticide exemptions.
Reduced-Risk Pesticides ListIPM Programs utilize anumber of methods to control pests while ensuring a safe environment. Chemical pesticidesrepresent only asingle control strategy and in San Francisco are used only as a last resorl. Sanitation, other pestprevention measures, and non-chemical management approaches should all be implemented first.
San Francisco's Reduced-Risk Pesticide List (RRPL) represents the pesticide products approved for use under SanFrancisco's Integrated Pest Management Ordinance (Adopted 10/96, Chapter 3, San Francisco Environmental Code) when
less toxic alternatives are deemed not feasible. No other pesticide products may be used on properties belonging to SFwithout an exemption from SFE (see summary of exemptions below).
The list is updated yearly to reflect the availability of new reduced risk products, removal of products with the greatesthuman health and environmental concern, or products no longer needed. To determine which products present the greatesthazards, SFE employs a robust tier-rating system. This tier system looks beyond the signal word and acute toxicity of aproduct and evaluates pesticides on such factors as chronic effects (I.e. cancer, reproductive harm), environmental effects(I.e. persistence, bioaccumulation, mobility, water quality), and non-target effects (I.e. impact on wildlife, bees). Using thesecriteria, products are grouped into tiers with Tier I being the most toxic, Tier III as least toxic, and Tier IV products not havingenough information for evaluation.
The tier rating flags potential hazards in a product. The SF IPM Technical Advisory Committee then examines other factorsaffecting risk, particularly use patterns, the potential for exposure, and hazards of other alternatives, before recommending apesticide for inclusion on the RRPL. SFE considers this approach to be an example of "anticipatory action to prevent harm,"as reqUired by the City's Precautionary Principle Ordinance (SF Environment Code, Chapter 1). To see the list, and formore information on the creation of this list see:http://www.sfenvironment.org/downioads/librarv/20100420 sf pesticide list red legged frog.pdf
Four key points about San Francisco's list deserve emphasis:• A pesticide list is not an IPM program. Pesticides should be the last resort, when all other tactics have failed.• This list is for institutions, not residents. Many pesticides on the list were added for specialized purposes not found
in residential settings. Homeowners will usually need few or no pesticides to successfully manage common pestproblems.
• Fewer listed products is not necessarily better. IPM programs require a toolbox of alternatives, for example,alternative attractants in least-toxic ant baits. Therefore, a larger list is indicative of the diversity of pest problemsencountered, and does not imply that pesticide use is higher. The important measures of success are: Amount of highlytoxic chemicals actually used (both active and inert ingredients), and overall effectiveness in pest suppression.
• The SF RRPL only applies to City and County of San Francisco departments and properties. Cities are onlylegally empowered to regUlate their own pesticide use, not the pesticide use of residents or businesses.
ExemptionsExemptions for 2008-09 are listed in Table 1. Under the IPM Ordinance, SFE has the responsibility of reviewing andgranting exemptions for the use of pesticides not listed on the Reduced Risk Pesticide List (RRPL). Applicants mustdemonstrate agood-faith effort to find alternatives to the banned pesticide; that effective, economic alternatives to thebanned pesticide do not exist for the particular use; and that they have developed a reasonable plan for investigatingalternatives to the banned pesticide during the exemption period. Exemptions may be granted as "trial," "regUlar," or"emergency" exemptions:
• Pilot exemptions are granted for the purpos~ of testing products that show promise as less hazardous alternatives.• Regular exemptions are considered for managing rare or unforeseen pest problems that cannot be adequately
controlled using products on the RRPList.• Emergency exemptions are permitted under the IPM ordinance when a "pest outbreak poses an immediate threat to
public health or significant economic damage will result from failure to use a pesticide." In these cases, a Citydepartment will proceed with a pesticide treatment without SFE prior approval, but must still notify SFE afterwards.
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page I
Key Citywide Pesticide Use Statistics
Since the beginning of the {PM Program in 1996:
81 %reduction Total pesticide use 1996 through 2009, excluding rodenticides and mosquito treatments(Ibs. of product)88% reduction(gals. of product)76% reduction(Ibs. of active ingr.)
85% reduction All herbicide active ingredients, 1996 through 2009(Ibs. of active ingr.)
83% reduction Glyphosate (Roundup® active ingredient) use 1996 through 2007Obs. of active inar.)
Since 1999 (Beginning of Tier system):
65% reduction(Ibs. of active ingr.)
Tier I (highest toxicity) total pesticide (not including rodenticides and mosquito treatments
General trendsPesticide use for calendar years 2008 and 2009 are summarized in Table 2 and Figure 1(total pesticide active ingredientsused since 1996) and Table 2 (pesticide use by City departments). Only pesticides used by City departments or Citycontractors on City-owned properties are covered by this data.
• The most hazardous pesticides, in the largest amounts, are still consumed by the City's golf courses, andparticularly by Harding Park. This is primarily due to the extraordinarily high cosmetic and playability requirementsof international tournaments. In 2009, Harding Park managers switched to an herbicide product called K-O-G whichcontains a much lower concentration of active ingredient - thus posing lower worker health hazard. However, thischange also dramatically increases the poundage of herbicides used. Recreation & Park staff have experimentedwith a variety of less-toxic products in order to control problematic weeds at the course (especially Soliva sessillus)but have not been successful. Nevertheless, Harding has received accolades from PGA Tours for usingsignificantly less pesticides than comparable, tournament level courses.
• Another product that accounts for a significant portion of increased pesticide use in 2008-2009 is a least-toxicproduct called Agrifos. Agrifos is injected into native oak trees threatened with Sudden Oak Death syndrome.Sudden Oak Death is an introduced disease that has reached epidemic proportions, and has been decimating oaksthroughout the state.
• The Citywide pest control contractor, Pestec, conducts most structural pest control and mosquito control efforts.88% of Pestec's site visits in 2009 resulted in non-chemical treatments.
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page 2
Notes on Pesticide Use DataThe trends noted in this report are drawn from pesticide use data collected by the big seven City departments and theCitywide pest control contractor since the passage of the Integrated Pest Management Ordinance in 1996. Below are someimportant notes on the data.
Data collection problemsPesticide use data collection has until recently been accomplished using acustomized Microsoft Access database. Thistool gradually became outdated, making data collection for 2008 and 2009 exceptionally time-consuming. As a result, someusage details available in previous years are not available for 2008-2009. With the rollout of a new web-enabled database(beginning 1/1/10), these problems should be solved.
Tier Rating SystemThe tier rating system was not implemented until 1999, when we evaluated all products in use at that time. Tier I productuse may therefore be underreported previous to 1999, since those are the products we were most likely to eliminate in thefirst years of the program. For this reason, we have in some cases only analyzed data collected since 1999 whenevaluating Tier levels.
Some products are excludedThe numbers reported throughout this report exclude the use of Bioweed and Suppressa herbicides/mulches, becausethese products are composed entirely of corn gluten meal, a food grade ingredient that is 100% non-toxic. The use of theseTier III products requires unusually large quantities of material-thousands of pounds with each application--which wouldskew the graphs if included. Bioweed was used only in 2000 before its use was discontinued (the large amounts neededwere not feasible). The use of Suppressa has likewise declined.
Rodenticides are presented separatelyRodenticide use is presented separately from other pesticide data due to both their public health importance, their unusuallysmall amount of active ingredient (not visible when graphed with other products), and the fact that they are generallyrequired as a response to a public health problem. The latter point means thatSFE has more limited control overrodenticide use than over herbicides and insecticides.
Public health mosquito treatments are considered separatelyLike rodenticide use, mosquito treatments are made in response to pUblic health concerns, such as the West Nile virus, andare therefore not under the control of SFE. For this reason, pUblic health treatments are excluded from some analyses.
Muni coach insecticide treatmentsSFE currently only has four years worth of data for insecticidal treatments of Muni coaches (which consist of gel baitsapplied in inaccessible points for cockroach control). While the amount of active ingredient used In relatively small, we didnot include it in some graphs because it would confound year-to-year comparisons.
Important factors to consider in analysisThe goals of the SF IPM program are to effectively manage pests, emphasize prevention and non-chemical controls, and inso doing to reduce both the amount and toxicity of pesticides used. However, measuring the success of an IPM program isa complex task. Before drawing conclusions from pesticide use statistics, it is important to consider these factors:
• Long-term trends are more important than short-term. Pesticide use always varies somewhat from year to year dueto weather, pest pressure, special renovation projects, staffing or other factors. A change in pesticide use from theprevious year does not necessarily indicate a long-term trend.
• Exposure potential is as important as toxicity in determining risk. A key aim of a pest management program is thereduction of risk. Risk is primarily determined by two factors: Toxicity (for example, how much chemical is required toimpair a human or other animal) and exposure (for example, how much of the chemical is likely to actually reach a
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page 3
human or other animal). This means that the formulation and use of the products is all-important. For example,pesticides applied as aerosol sprays have much higher exposure potential-and therefore pose agreater risk-thanpesticides encased in tamperproof bait boxes.
• Amount of active ingredient used is the preferred performance measure for pesticide reduction efforts.Referring oniy to pounds and gailons used can be deceptive. Use statistics expressed in pounds and gallons maskspecific products used, and do not necessarily refiect levels of risk posed by pesticides. For example, someproducts-such as elemental sulfur fungicide, or corn gluten meal-may be relatively nontoxic, but require highapplication rates to be effective. Another factor not illuminated by overall use statistics is the varying amount of activeingredient (ai) in different formulations. For example, Vanquish (active ingredient=dicamba 57%) and Proturf NewKOG Weed Controi (active ingredient=dicamba 0.7%) both contain the same active ingredient, but Vanquish is aconcentrate. The total pounds remains important to reflect the amount of so-called inert ingredients applied, sincethese chemicals pose undocumented hazards.
• Administrativelbudget impacts are also important. Increases in the number of buildings or outdoor acresmaintained, decreases in iandscaping staff, or underfunding can increase the pressure for herbicide spraying, whichoften requires less labor than non-chemical methods. Conversely, maintenance delayed (for example, by budgetaryrestraints) can lead to more serious problems in the future.
• Ineffective pest management also poses risks. West Nile virus or encephalitis transmitted by mosquitoes, allergiesor asthma caused by cockroaches, and enteric diseases spread by rats are a few examples of hazards posed by peststhemselves. It is important to remember that San Francisco's IPM Program has dual aims: Reduction of pesticidehazards and effective pest management.
• These data do not represent residential or commercial pest management trends.
Future ActivitiesDatabase improvements: Once completed, the web-enabled pesticide use database will provide:
• Standardization of several fields to improve reporting• Continue improving our ability to track pesticide use based on pounds of active ingredient used.• Streamlined report generation to enable users to print out pesticide use reports required by state regulators without
additional effort.• Implementation of new web-enabled database, including training of IPM personnel.
Pesticide use data collection improvements:• We plan to continue implementing asystem where we can identify specific non-toxic actions such as sanitation,
trapping, mechanical weed control, exclusion, and more.
Harmonizing the IPM program with broader sustainable landscape standards.• In the "Idea Oiympics" event, IPM practitioners clearly expressed the need to broaden the scope of our activities to
include such closely related SUbjects as water conservation, soil conservation, landscape design elements, andplant selection. For this reason, the IPM Program will take steps to become more involved with the Bay FriendlyLandscaping Guidelines and the LEED Sustainable Sites Initiative.
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page 4
Table 1. Summary of exemptions requested in 2008 and 2009.
Slatus of Date Name of SF City Dept Product Name EPA Address of pesticide PestExemption DECIDED APPLICANT Registration # use
STATUSAPPROVED· 21512008 Ralph Montana Recreation and Garton 4 UltJ:a 62719-527 Natural areas WeedsReQular Park DepartmentDENIED· Regular 3120/2008 Ralph Montana Recreation and Roundup Pro 524-505-AA Candlestick Park parking Weeds
Park Deoartment Drv lot ~ 8 acres?APPROVED· Pilot 4/1812008 Merle Goldstone Public Works, OvoControl P 80224-1 Portsmouth Square (Pilot Pigeons
Deoartment study)PILOT 4/2412008 Ralph Montana Recreation and Mycotrol 70810-10 GGP nursery soft bodiedEXEMPTION Park Department insectsAPPROVED· 511712008 Kristen Natoli Cal Academy of Cleary's 33336 1001-63-AA Palms in front of new Cal Pink rot ~
Regular Sciences WP Academy bldg Gleocladium
~APPROVED· 6112/2008 Don Thomas Public Utilities Stalker 241·398 Watershed lands Weeds, asp.PilofAPPROVED Commission yellow star
(Water) thistleAPPROVED· 6117/2008 Ralph Montana Recreation and ProZap Insect 5481·338-36208 Irrigation control boxes at EarwigsRegular Park Department Guard Harding/Fleming Park
Golf CoursesAPPROVED· 818/2008 Sean SlNeeny Recreation and Sapphire 62719·547 Fairways and green surrounds BellisRegular Park Department atHardlng, Fleming, Golden perennis
Gate, Sharp Park and Lincoln (ENGLISH
Park golf courses LAWNDAISY) ANDWHITECLOVER
APPROVED· 9/1512008 Juan Carrasco, Redevelopment Subdue Maxx 100·796 6th St. between Mission PhythophthoRegular Bartlett Tree Agency & Folsom ra root rot
Experts and pythiumAPPROVED· 911512008 Juan Carrasco, Redevelopment Cleary's 33336 1001·69 6th St. between Mission Pink rotRegular Bartlett Tree Agency WP & Folsom (Gliocaldium
Experts vermoesini)
PRODUCT NOT 9115/2008 Luis Agurto Public Health, OvoControl P 80224·1 Laguna Honda Hospital PigeonsUSED YET· Pilot Department of
DENIED· Regular 1012912008 Ralph Montana Recreation and Proxy Growth 432-1230 Harding Park Golf Course WeedsPark Deoartment Reaulator
APPROVED· 11112009 Don Thomas Public Utilities Habitat (BASF) 241-426 Watershed lands Jubata grassRegular Commission (CortaderiaExemption (Water) jubata)
APPROVED· Pilot 111612009 Don Thomas Public Utilities Habitat (BASF) 241-426 Watershed lands Jubata grassCommission (Cortaderia(Water) jubata)
APPROVED· 312/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Primo 100·752 Harding Park Golf Course WeedsRegularExemotionAPPROVED· 31212009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Trimmit 100·1014 Harding Park Golf Course WeedsRegularExemotionAPPROVED· 3/212009 Ralph Montana Recreation and Primo 100-752 Harding Park Golf Course WeedsReQular Park DeoartmentAPPROVED· 3/212009 Ralph Montana Recreation and Trimmit 100-1014 Harding Park Golf Course WeedsB.§:gular Park DepartmentAPPROVED· 4123/2009 Luis Agurto, Jr. Recreation & Park Quintox 12455·57 Exploratorium -eating MiceRegular areaExemption
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page 5
Status of Date Name of SF City Dept. Product Name EPA Address of pesticide PestExemption DECIDED APPLICANT Registration # use
STATUSAPPROVED- 4/23/2009 Luis Agurto, Jr. Recreation & Park Top Gun Bait 67517-66-56 Exploratorium -eating RatsRegular Block area OUTSIDEExemptionAPPROVED- 4/23/2009 Luis Agurto, Jr. Recreation and Top Gun Bait 67517-66-56 Exploratorium -eating RatsReaular Park Deoartment Block area OUTSIDEAPPROVED- 4/23/2009 Luis Agurto, Jr. Recreation and Quintox 12455-57 Exploratorium weating Mice~ular Park Deoartment areaDENIED- Regular 6/9/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park PROXY EPA Est. No. Harding Park Golf Course Poa annuaExemption 264-PA-01 seed heads
APPROVED- 6/24/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Sapphire 62719-547 Golden Gate Golf EnglishRegular Course...9 holes DaisyExemotionAPPROVED- 7/10/2009 sean glover Port Fastrac All 12455-95 PIER 17 Rats andRegular Weather Blox MiceExemotionAPPROVED- Trial 7/15/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Acelepryn 352-731 Polo Fields In Golden RavensUse Exemption Gate Paark
APPROVED- 8/2/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Coretect 432-1457 Arboretum,Conservatory, Thrips,whitefRegular Nursery lies,scale,apExemption hids,mealybu
gs, and more
APPROVED- 8/30/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Merit 0,5G 432-1328 Candlestick Park...and CrowsRegUlar Polo/Soccer FieldsExemptionAPPROVED- Trial 9/23/2009 Luis Agurto PUblic Health ?iginX 84418-1 San Francisco General PigeonUse Exemption Hospital
APPROVED- 9/23/2009 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Daconil FF 50534-209-100 Harding Golf Course AlgaeRegularExemptionAPPROVED- Trial 9/2 Ralph Montana Recreation & Park Regalia 84059-2 Golden Gate Park fungal andUse Exemption Nursery bacterial
diseasesAPPROVED- Trial 9/28/20 alph Montana Recreation & Park Rejexwit exempt Harding Golf Course RavensUse Exemption /Migrate
APPROVED- 10/5/2009 Joseph Ossai Public Health CB-80 EXTRA 9444-175 bedbugwinfested rooms BedbugsRegular INSECTICIDEExemptionAPPROVED- 11/10/2009 Carlos Agurto Small Business, Gentrollgr 2724-351 SFFD Station 41 Drain fliesRegular Office of ConcentrateExemption
San Francisco Integrated Pest Management Program 2008-2009 Report Page 6
Table 2. Citywide pesticide use since establishment of the rPM Program. Unless otherwise noted, numbers are presented as pounds of active ingredient used,Only pesticide applications by City departments and contractors on City properties are included,
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 20063100 1745 2615 2421 1147 438 9" 643 264 523 525
306 27 1183 1104 347 22 40 164 126 156 142335 200 172 158 96 50 115 57 20 44 46
2141 1410 1227 624 370 "9 830 362 212 361 331155 45 51 31 74 16 14 8 0 4 3
109 168 314 33 195 285 126 " 126 930 "11 267 14 10 2 296 96 564 1502 433 1188 1517
0,93 0.85 0.53 0.07 0.09 0.15 0.16 0.11 0.08 11.85 0.12 2.073366 1958 2980 246' 1416 739 1142 710 421 1468 622 '79 1049 818 76%
~ir:i': •.•·•..:::'i.'Use ofpublic health insecticides and rIXlenticides fall primarily under the jurisdiction ofthe Department of Public Health and the san Mateo Co.M(}S~it~Al>~tement District.For ease of interpretation. these data are not included in the lotal pesticide use figures.
- -Data not yet available for 2003-09. fungicides, moIiuscicides, and other pesticides are lumped under -retal Pesticides Active Ingfedients."
HerbicidesHerbicides (lbs ailHerbicides (gals ailGlyphosate only
FungicIdesInsecticides(no pub! health)Public HealthInsecticidesRodenticides
Total Pesticides· nopubHc health(active ingredients)
Figure 1. Citywide pesticide use, total pounds of active ingredient. Fungicides, rodenticldes, and mollusclcides are Included in the total.
1:.S!
fCl.5..>
~1:l...J
4000 Ti---------
3000
2000
1000
-.
--Herbicides
- ~ Public Health Insecticides
--Total Pesticides ~ no public health(active ingredients)
-' ,
0+---':"-~'---,----,,.....-.''-'r--.-''--~~-~-~~-~-~---1
2>'""q,~~
f1>'b"q,
f1>'1>"q,
,,<::>~
,,"~
,,'),
~,,'"'),<:5
~'),<:5 ,,'"
~,,'"~
~~
,,'0~
,,'1>~
Table 3. Breakdown of pesticide use by department, 2008-2009
alai Lb. atTie:tJ
Total Lbs of (Highe.tPesticide H~~~~d)
T6talLbsof ACtive ActivePestieidtis Ingredients Ingredietits
ITOlal Lb. of I~otal.L.bs
Total Lb. of Total Lb.NO> No No
IActi~~-Rodehticides Rodehtiddes Rodehtl¢ldesor- M()$qllitd 6rMosq~it? or Mosquito IActive IActive Active
INOTESDEPT Treatrnehts Treatments Treatments Ingredient
2008CITYWIDE 3320.75 1049.08 76.24 0.064 779.55 505.19 1942.32 ;:.
Public Health 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.05Public Works 258.00 180.78 0.00 0.000 180.78 180.78 0.00 Includes treatments for MuniPort 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00Public Utilities 389.01 169.56 0.001 96.83 89.62 Most non-herbicide pesticide use isCommission Agrifos, used for treatina oak treesRec & Parks 2075.13 517.00 76.05 0.010 326.94 95.50 Change of herbicide products in golf
accounted for large increase inpoundage - 1,155lbsoftotal (8.088Ibsof active ingredient)
Airport 396.52 177.42 0.00 0.002 173.00 139.10 1516.89 Extensive use of oils for mosquitotreatments
Contractor 202.08 4.33 0.19 0.051 0.00 0.00 425.38
2009CITYWIDE 2227.84 818.31 148.56 0.033 578.69 367.94 938.13Public Health 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.03Public Works 141.83 79.61 0.00 0.000 79.61 79.61 0.00 Includes treatments for MuniPort 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.00Public Utilities 258.86 112.19 0.001 84.97 67.17 Most non-herbicide pesticide use isCommission IAqrifos, used for treating oak treesRec& Parks 1241.39 456.43 148.56 0.004 249.66 73.66 0.55Airport 400.71 166.23 0.00 0.001 164.44 147.50 628.33 Extensive use of oils for mosquito
treatmentsContractor 185.05 3.84 0.00 0.027 0.00 0.00 309.22 Mostly Advance Uq Ant Bait, Gentrol
Point Source, and Terro pca forstructural pest control treatments: AllTier III (lowest hazard). 88% of visitsresulted in nonchemical treatment
SFEnvironmentOur home. Our city. Our planet.
Pamela Olivier, OCAHannah Safford, Intern, SFE
GAVIN NEWSOMMayor
MELANIE NUTIERDirector
Annual Report: 2009 San Francisco Green Purchasing Program for City StaffPresented to the Commission on the Environment, City County of San Francisco
October 5, 2010
Prepared by SF Department of the Environment (SFE) Toxics Reduction Team: Jessian Choy & Chris GeigerWith assistance from:
Alicia Culver, Green Purchasing InstituteLynn Khaw, Office of Contract Administration fOCAl
Table of Contents
I. Executive Summary 2II. Introduction 2
A. History and Mandate 2B. Precautionary Purchasing Ordinance 2C. Summary of Past Annual Reports 2D. Scope of Report 2E. 2009 Staff That Worked on Green Purchasing 2
III. 2009 Accomplishments 3A. City Champions That Bought Required Green Products 3B. Vendors That Sold Required Green Products 4C. 2009 Total Contracts & Products in SF Approved List {Details in Table E) 4D. 2009 % Required Green Products Bought by the City (Details in Table A) 4E. Policies and Specifications 4F. Trainings to City Staff 5G. New Outreach Methods 5
IV. Actions or Laws Needed To Implement Green Purchasing Ordinance 5A. Need More Cost-Efficient Way to Track Sales 5B. Need Better Way for City Staff to Read / Write Green Producf Reviews Online 6
V. 2010 Workplan 6A. New Ideas SFE Will Explore for Green Contracls 6B. Outreach 6C. Carpel... 6D. Computers 6E. Foodware 6F. Janitoriai Cleaners 6G. Lighting 6H. Paints 6
VI. Tabies , 7A. City Purchases of Required Green Products 2007-09 7B. All City Champions of Green Foodware 2009 8C. All City Champions of Green Cleaners, Paper Towels, Toilet Tissue / Seat Covers 2009 9
, D. All City Champions of Paper 2009 {JOO% Post-Consumer Recycled, Processed Chlorine-free) 13E. Details of Contracts & Products in SF Approved List 2009 19F. City Purchases of Green Office Supplies 2009 21
10/512010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 1 of22
I. Executive Summary
The San Francisco Department ot the Environment (SFE) and the Ottice of Contract Administration (OCA) havetaken lead roles in implementing the City's Precautionary Purchasing Ordinance.
Major accomplishments tor 2009
Since the ordinance passed in 2005, SFE created a list of over 1.000 green products for City staff withenvironmentaily preferabie specifications for 34 green product subcategories. and 13 citywide commoditiescontracts.
In 2009, San Francisco became the first city in the nation to require purchases of EPEAT-Gold computer andClimate Savers computer servers. New janitorial services contract language was developed that requirescontracted custodians to use SF Approved products and implement other measures compatible with greenbuilding certifications. Overall purchases of Required Green Products were $6,924.291.
Total Required Green Products boughf: 79% for computers, 78% for janitoriai cleaners, 72% for janitorial papers.50% for lighting products. 93% for office papers, 70% for selected categories of office supplies. and 31 % for tonercartridges.
SFE started to create SFApproved.org. a new site for easier compliance and where to buy green products.
Future activitiesIn 2010. SFE will work on at least three new contracts-office supplies. janitorial cleaners. and compostable trashcan liners-and continue to improve existing specifications and user buy-in.
II. Introduction
A. History and Mandate
San Francisco has been buying green products since the 1980s. but purchasing requirements were scatteredamong several ordinances. In 1998, the City undertook an ambitious Green Purchasing Pilot Program which:
• Inventoried and assessed hazardous chemical products purchased by City departments
• Established environmental and health criteria
• Set priorities
• Field tested products.
In 2005, San Francisco became the first city in the nation to enact the Precautionarv Purchasing Ordinance.
B. Precautionary Purchasing Ordinance
The Precautionarv Purchasing Ordinance (Environment Code, Chapter 2) requiresestablishes goals andprocedures for environmentally preferabie purchasing (green purchasing) by City funds to be usedtodepartments. This ordinance was groundbreaking in its application of the Precautionary Principie(Environment Code, Chapter 1), and in its mandate that purchasers for the city may only buy commoditiesfrom "approved alternative product lists" for certain products. The "approved alternative products" gre nowcategorized as REQUIRED products in the SF Approved List at SFApproved.org.
C. Summary of Past Annual Reports
Table A compgres the %difference in green purchases from 2007-09.
D. Scope of Report
In its description of program activities, this report covers the calendar year 2009. Previous reports gre at:www.sfenvironment.org/sfapproved. Table 1 compares the %difference in green purchases from 2007-09.
E. 2009 Staff That Worked on Green Purchasing
OCA SFE
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 2 of 22
Julie Bryant
Jessian Choy
Chris Geiger
Paul Ledesma
Bill Jones
Naomi Keliy
Galen Leung
Pamela Olivier
Howard Teveison
Ken Easton
Full-Time Equivalent (FTE): 2.5, inciuding the OCA Green Purchaser funded by SFE since 2008.
111.2009 Accomplishments
A. City Champions That Bought Required Green ProductsThe City would like to thank Green Teams beiow and ali Champions of green foodware, janitorial, papers (SeeTables B-D).
City StaffThat Bought 90+% Required Green Cleaners, Paper Towels, Toilet Tissue J Seat CoversAnimal Care &Control:Animal Care &Control: Victor SerratoAsian Art Museum:Library:Library: Darren BrownPolice: Dante GiovannelPolice: Don WestPolice: Don WestPolice: Ed BarsettiPolice: Eric PettersonPolice: Fred KwanPolice: Leon KiangPolice: Lucy CiemonsPolice: L nn ReiliyPolice: Mark HutchinsPolice: R&Y Chin
· Police: Ricardo Rodriguez· Police: Sandra Ribeiro
Police: Scott GainesPolice: Tim VeePolice: Tom TangPolice: Victor RothenbergPolice: Yesinia BrandtSheriff: Daniel GertsikovSheriff: Joyce Wong
· Sheriff: Richard Castilio
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 3 of 22
B. Vendors That Sold Required Green ProductsThe Cit would like to thank all vendors that sold reen roducts. Below is a artiallist:
Janitorial %Total REQUIRED
REQUIRED REQUIRED PROHIBITED PROHIBITED PROHIBITEDVendors Green &PROHIBITED CLEANERS PAPERS PROHIBITED CLEANER CLEANER: CLEANERS: PROHIBITED
Products BATTERIES DEGREASERS General Glass PAPERSPur ose
Clean Source $ 30 430.89 $300.430.89
H&Llnt'1 $ 70,550.47 $ 70.550.47
Aldran $ 1,213.20 $ 1.213.20
United $ 32,009.10 $ 26.039.60 $ 3.504.40 $ 2.465.10
Waxie $ 376,028.80 $ 918.40 $293,220.39 $ 324.00 $ 81,566.01
Santora Sales $ 734,709.79 $ 6.310.32 $405.199.95 $ 7.40 $ 59.99 $ 1,908.06 $321,224.07
Champion $ 3,291.00 $ 3,051.00 $ 240.00
Grand Total $1,518,233.25 $34,481.52 $1,069.401.70 $ 7.40 $ 3,504.40 $ 3,434.99 $ 4,613.16 $402,790.08
LiQhtinQ Vendors (lamps) % Reauired Green Total ProductsMaltbv 5% $ 55,944.51Omeaa 21% $ 290,891.11
C. 2009 Total Contracts & Products in SF Approved List (Details in Table E)Total SubCategories
80
D. 2009 % Required Green Products Bought by the City (Details in Table A)
COMPUTERS (2009=lIrsl year for purchasing requirements)
JANITORIAL CLEANERS
JANITORIAL PAPERS
LIGHTING (bulbs/lamps, ballasts)
OFFICE PAPER (Copier &Bond)
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TONER CARTRIDGES
Total
E. Policies and Specifications
San Francisco was the tirst major city to create these purchasing requirements
• Computer equipment: Worked with Dept. ofTechnology. SF Public Utilities Commission. and theCommittee on Information Technology (COlT) to adopt EPEAT Gold as a purchasing requirement forall laptops. desktops, and monitors.
• Computer servers: Worked with Dr, PUC and COlT to require that all non-blade computer servers belisted by the Climate Savers Computing Initiative.
Food policy: Submitted draft language for a sustainable food procurement ordinance, as required by theMayor's Executive Directive 09-03. Worked with city stakehoiders and SF Department of Public Health,
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 4 of 22
Office supplies: Worked with OCA on language for new office supplies confract.
Lighfing: Updated specifications for lamps, bulbs and ballasfs, for fhe nexf lighfing contract
Janitorial services: Created language for inclusion in janitorial services contracts that promotes compatibilitywith the US Green Building Council's LEED-EB O&M (2009) checklist, as well as compatibility with the City'sgreen purchasing requirements.
F. Trainings to City Staff
Trainings
Easier compliance with new SF ApprovedList. How can SFE make it easier for City staffto buy green & recycle toxic products?
Green cleaning trainings (10 trainings)
People Trained Depls. Hours
385 12 12
302 custodians. Mostiy from City, two 4 30trainings included SF Green Businesses
505 Staff 16 Depts. 42 HoursTOTAL
G. New Outreach Methods
1. Published and called each staff that bought:
a. Required green products to thank them.
b. Prohibited products to find out how to make it easier for them to buy from the SF Approved List.
2. Created the City Staff Green Purchasing Compliance Checklist.
3. Worked with Climate Action Coordinator to require City Depts. to host at least one SFE Green Purchasing &Hazwaste Consultation per year with their staff that can:
a. Initiate or approve purchases, or develop contracts.
b. Add the SF Approved List website to Requisition, Payment, Encumbrance, & Materials Request formsor software. This will remind all staff to check the List before each purchase.
4. Sent 4 email newsletters to over 1,300 City staff.
5.. Drafted letter for Mayor to send to all 28,000 City staff on easier compliance with the new SF Approved.
6. Combined 6 SF Approved Lists of differenf product categories Into a one-stop shop. the SF Approved List.
IV.Actions or Laws Needed To Implement Green Purchasing Ordinance
A. Need More Cost-Efficient Way to Track Sales
Issues:
1. More incentives/disincentives are needed to prevent vendors from selling (or City staff from buying)Prohibited products.
2. In order to track the amount of green products the City bought, SFE:
a. Wouid like to thank Pamela Olivier and Lynn Khaw at OCA for collecting and merging 20+spreadsheets of sales reports from vendors.
b. Needs to reduce the 100+ hours spent to clean these spreadsheets from vendors (each havingabout 2,000 rows of data).
3. Better information resources are needed to allow staff and vendors to easily identify products meetingthe City's environmentai specifications.
Proposed Solutions: The City may save money in the long-run if:
1. An online "data warehouse" could ensure vendors submit accurate data.
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 5 of 22
2. Sample consequences could be enacted tor vendors that sell Prohibited products or inaccurately tillout SFE's sales report template:
• Vendors would get less points in future bids.
• Their current contract couid be canceled.
3. The City purchasing system, ADPICS could:
a) Create quick reports to ensure City was not overcharged, who bought Required/Prohibited products.
b) Take Green Seai's suggestion for cities to hove green commodity codes.
c) Prompt City staff to buy from the SF Approved List.
B. Need Better Way for City Staff to Read / Write Green Product Reviews Online
SFE implemented a low-budget way for City staff to read / write green product reviews but a more userfriendly method is needed for cieaners and pesticides.
Implement new janitorial cleaners contract & continue meetings with Custodial Products Green Team.
Direct outreach to departments who are not purchasing Required green cleaners.
Lighting
Meet with end-users and SFPUC to increase sales ot Required green lighting. Implement new lamps andballasts contract. Explore outsourcing ot SF Approved Lighting List of thousands of products.
Paints
••
•B.
••
C.
•D.
•••
E.
••
F.
••
G.
•
H.
V. 2010 Workplan
A. New Ideas SFE Will Explore for Green Contracts
Designate products that can be replaced with green products as Limited Use and/or Prohibited.
Implement the SF Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) Resolution. Vendors selling should find newways to make it easier and more affordable for City staff to buy green products and recycle.
Try to get better prices for green products (e.g., make forecast quantities greater for green products).
Outreach
Meet with all OCA purchasers for 1 hour on how both depts. can help promote each other's mission.
SFE will continue to train delegated purchasers annually.
Carpet
Review existing carpet standards/certifications and identify the best to add to the SF Approved List.
Computers
Collaborate with OCA. Dept. of Technology vendors in deveioping a workable sales reporting system.
Work directiy with IT Store vendors to improve education on green computers.
Monitor development of new Energy Star standards for computer servers and update City requirements.
Foodware
Continue to work with hospital staff to prevent people from putting non-compostables in the green bin.
Work with OCA and SFDPH to inciude local, and/or organic food in the new citywide dairy contract.
Janitorial Cleaners
• Work with City painters to pilot test green paints.
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff w SFApproved,org Page 6 of 22
A. Cny Purchases of Required Green Products 2007·09
85% EPEAT Gold$1.035,203 I $1,221,784 I (95% if EPEAT
Silver included) Many specialized monitors (wnh cameras, touch screens) not EPEAT
31% certified, AU levels of Climate Savers included in calculation for serverl
$151,218 $482,036 (75%if EPEATpurchases, Blade servers are inherently more efficient but do not yet
Silver included)fall under acertification system.
$476.523 $558,857 85%
14P21,692 $5,087.625 79%
$193,529 ... $219,265 ... $382,953
$18,456 ... $42,048 ... $93,570
$211,685 $261,313 ... 1476,523 $476,523
... $41,505 ... $708 $708 100%$10,406 74% $26,967 ... $26,040 $29.544 88% 1 Percentages are volatile due to low sales volume. Some$1,719 29% $10,506 ... $S.193 $8,628 60% I departments bought these products off-conlract using departmental
$548 ... $2,541 $5,484 46% J purchasing authority. New contract in development
$12,125 $79,525 ... l34A82 $44,364 78%
$464,224 100% $623,762 ... $392,60.
$85,767 100% $51,744 $640,590
$115,982 58% $251,234 ... $73.117
$665,973 $926,740 ... $1,106,311 $1,530,78' 72%
$3,658 Ii ,.LIO ... ... $7.574 $11,633 66% Understates green lighting purchases due to separate contracts for
$152,754 11':~:;: $11,563,..
$3',723 $101,29' 34%SF PUC efficient lighting retrofits. 2009 is the first year we had fullvendor cooperation on sales data. lamps %compares Required
$40,678 ,. _:~~~~-, $3,249 I~ .~:_~_~, $41,016 $53.407 77% lamps to total lamps purchased. CFL %compares Required Green
$83,313CFLs to total CFls of' Prohibited incandescents purchased. 18% of all
$166,333 50% lamps purchased were Required.,307 units 382 units NfA
357 units 374 units NfA
278 units 313 units NfAThis contract applies to leases ofunits, not purchases.
942 units 1069 units NfA 475 units NfA NfA
$145,533 88%
$775 0% Specification increased from 30% to 100% PCW in 2008. Colored
$18,703 11%papers, specialty papers, odd sizes not included in calculation. 2008
s 1,172,104)1 data incomplete.
$524,766 $165,012 100% , 1,172,104.31 $1,261,449 93%
$8,597 $16,410 49% $248 $506 50%
Data does not include Dec., 2009 sales. See Tables 2&3for$27,903 $39.852 70% details on covered product categories.
$28,156 $40,358 70%
$1,710 $S,469 31% Data only since beginning of contract {June-Dec. 'O9}
10/5/2010$950,804 2009 Annual Rt~i'MM Green purchas;n&'iJl~'g~~'m for c;t1'l5ilift'~'tFApprovell"6\-g Page 7 of 22
Tables B-D. List of City Champions that bought Required green productsTo get in the iist:
1) Use the Green Purchasing Compliance Checkiist.
2) Each time you order, remind vendors to include ALL your sales & correct contact info In sales report spreadsheet to SFOCA:Customer name, Dept., Email, Phone,
B. All City Champions of Green Foodware 2009 (Required Products)
The City Thanks These City Champions Composlable Recyclable I~:'"'".' .", ~_V'"'"' ""e"
Animal Care &Control: Eric Zuercher $ 1,218,00 $ 1,218,00 $ 1,218,00Board of Supervisors: Ohn Myint $ 67,90 $ 67,90 $ 67,90City College of San Francisco: Stephanie Chui $ 7,578,88 $ 692.74 $ 9,675,52 $ 9,675,52Juvenile Probation Department: Christian Losno $ 2,094,90 $ 2,624,98 $ 4,719,88 $ 4,719,88Recreation &Park Department: Karla Rosales $ 88,80 $ 189,50 $ 278,30 $ 278,30School District, San Francisco Unified: Ellaine Ramos $ 4,164,13 $ 4,164,13 $ 4,164,13Public Health: Diego Davalos $ 93,322.40 $ 2,410.45 $ 151,472.24Public Health: Christine Hanson $ 3,187,24 $ 985,91 $ 4,173,15Public Health: Henry Kelly $ 70,487,11 $ 23,613.75 $ 158,070,21 $ 340,306,23
Public Health: Stanley Lee $ 5,364,00 $ 13,327,16 $ 18,870,02Public Health: $ 4,579,80 $ 2,182,66 $ 7,720,61Municipal Railway (PTD14): $ 690,00 $ 690,00 $ 690,00Total by City Champion $ 192,085.26 $ 46,785,05 $ 361,119,96 $ 361,119.96
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 8 of 22
C; All City Champions of Green Cleaners, Paper Towels, Toilet Tissue I Seat Covers 2009 (Required & Prohibited Products)
The City thanks all Champion that I%GreenIG %
REQUIREDPROHIBITED!
Total by City REQUIREDDegreaser
PROHIBITED REQUIRED General IREQUIRED IPROHIBITEDI REQUIRED IREQUIRED IREQUIRED IPROHIBITEDbought green cleaners &janitorial by b ~:nt
Staff Bathroom(Liquid
Degreasers General p Glass GLASS TOilet Seat T·I t T P T I PAPERSpapers Customer Y P
CleanerSunshine Purpose c~rpose Cleaner Cleaner Cover 01 e lssueaper owe s
Team777) Cleaner eaner
Airport: $ 246,261.97 $ $ $ 242,611.97 $ $ 3,650.00
Airport: Joseph Walsh $ 2,085.88 $ $ $ $ $ 2,085.88
Airport: Sekio Fuapopo $ 50,906.50 $ $ 50.906.50 $ $
Airport: Severin Rizzo $ 196,245.60 $ 1.707.60 $ $ 240.00 $ $ $194,298.00
Animal Care & Control: $ 1,990.80 $ $ $ $ 1,629.30 $ 361.50
Animal Care &Control: Victor Serrato $ 38.42 $ $ 38.42 $ $
Asian Art Museum: $ 480.60 $ $ $ $ 480.60
Rne Arts Museums: Kevin O'Brien $ 3,732.63 $ $ $ $ 1,263.90 $ 2,468.73
Fire: JeffWong $ 30,050.00 $ $ S S 21,196.00 $ 8,854.00
Housing Authority~ Alice Griffith Site: 0% $ 67.56 $ $ 67.56 $ $ $
Housing Authority~ Clementina St.: 14% $ 117.65 $ $ $ $ 16.56 $ 101.09
Housing Authorityw Clementina St:7% $ 230.46 $ $ $ . $ 15.78 $ 214.68
Philip
Housing Authorityw Egbert Site: IIIIIl I 1,108.61 $ $ $ $ 693.90 $ 414.71
Housing Authority· Egbert Site: John41% $ 270.04 $ . $ · $ $ 111.00 $ 159.04
Finnegan
Housing Authorityw Egbert Site: Oscar0%
, • $ 225.001 I I I I 1$ I 1$ • 1$ 1$ 1$ 115.00Parish
Housing Authority· Egbert Site: ", I 167.001 I I I I 1$ I 1$ · 1$ 1$ 1$ 167.00Youngsll Lee
Housing Aufhorityw Holly Courts Site:$ 23.32 $ $ 23.32 $ $ S
Ken Banford
Housing Authority· Pacific Ave: I 58.29 $ $ $ $ 58.29
Housing Authority- Potrero Site$ 169.30 $ 59.99 $ $ 67.56 $ $ $ . 1$ 41.75
Annex:
Housing Authority- Sunnydale Site: $ 118.08 $ $ 79.221 $ 1$ 1$ 38.86
Housing Authority- Webster Site:$ 41.75 $ $ $ $ $ 41.75
OmarLarea
Housing Authority: $ 13.87 $ $ $ $ $ 53.87
Housing Authority: Henry Kwan $ 38.86 S $ $ $ 38.86
Housing Authority: Oscar Parish $ 111,00 $ $ $ $ 111.00
Housing Authority: Youngsil Lee $ 412.28 $ $ $ $ 379.30 $ 32.98
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 9 0122
The City thanks all Champion that I%GreenIG %
REQUIREDPROHIBITED
Total by City REQUIREDDegreaser
PROHIBITEDREQUIRED General I REQUIRED IPROHIBITEDI REQUIRED IREQUIRED IREQUIRED IPROHIBITED
bought green cleaners &janitorial by b ~en (Liquid General Glass GLASS Torlet Seat . .papers Customer y ept. Staff Bathroom
SunshineDegreasers
Purpose Purpose CI CI C TOilet Tissue Paper Towels PAPERSTeam Cleaner
m) CleanerCleaner eaner eaner over
Human Services Commission: Albert 0% $ 11.62 $ $ . $ $ $ 11.62
Human Services Commission: lito0% 33% $ 802.58 $ $ $ $ $ 802.58
Dela Cruz. . ·
Human Services Commission: Lou$ 55.511 $ $ $ $ 55.50
Palileo
Juvenile Probation: $ 13,260.80 $ $ $ $ 4,209.65 $ 9,051.15
Juvenile Probation: Christian Lonso $ 1,186.40 $ 1,166.40 $ $ $ $
Library: $ 5,016.00 $ $ $ 5,016.00 $
Library: Darren Brown $ 25,767.10 $ 1,213.20 $ 2,881.00 $ $ 21,672.90
Municipal Transportation AgenCYM$ 109,899.98 $ $ $ $ 72,804.21 I$ 37,095.75
BurkeSt:
Municipal Transportation AgenCYM .,li@, ;f1WAIIIII $ 662.721 I I I I 1$ . I 1$ 1$ 1$ 554.841 $ 107.88Overhead Unes:
Municipal Transportation Agency~36.60 $ $ $ $ · 1$ 36.60
Woods Storeroom:
Police: Dante Giovannel $ 1,003.53 S $ $ S 1,003.53
Police: Don West $ 466,32 $ S $ $ 466.32
Police: Don West $ 466,32 S $ $ S 466,32
Police: Ed Barsetti $ 2,776.34 S S $ S 2,776.34
Pollce: Eric Petterson $ 1,820.64 $ S $ $ 1,820,64
Police: Fred Kwan $ 2,546.23 S $ $ S 2,546.23
Pollce: Leon Kiang $ 2,531.28 $ $ $ $ 2,531.28
Police: Lucy Clemons $ 1,409.37 $ $ $ $ 1,409.37
Police: Lynn Reilly $ 2,362.12 $ $ $ $ 2.362,12
Police: Mark Hutchins $ 2,306.06 $ $ $ $ 2,306,06
Police: R&Y Ching $ 246.85 $ $ $ $ 246,85
Police: Ricardo Rodriguez $ 1,363.20 $ 229,60 $ S $ $ • 1$ 1,133.60
Police: Sandra Ribeiro $ 58.29 $ $ $ $ 58.29
Police: Scott Gaines $ 638.21 $ $ $ $ 638.21
Police: Tim Yee $ 1,695.79 $ $ $ S 1,695.79
Police: Tom Tang $ 2,312.66 $ $ S S 2,312.66
Police: Victor Rothenberg $ 2,640,73 $ $ 768,40 $ $ 1,872,33
Police: Yesinia Brandt $ 2,484.98 $ $ S S 2,484.98
Port Gene Sheets $ 333.60 $ $ 333.60 $ $ $
Port: George $ 91.84 $ $ $ $ $ 91.84
Port: Lorenza Racklin $ 1,587.10 S $ $ $ $ 1,587.10
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 10 of22
.
REQUIREDThe City thanks all Champion that %Green
%Degreaser REQUIRED
PROHIBITEDREQUIRED PROHIBITED REQUIRED
Green Total by City REQUIRED PROHIBITED General REQUIRED REQUIRED PROHIBITEDbought green cleaners &janitorial byby Dept Staff Bathroom
(liquidDegreasers
GeneralPurpose
Glass GLASS Toilet SeatToilet Tissue Paper Towels PAPERSpapers Customer Sunshine Purpose Cleaner Cleaner Cover
Team Cleaner777) Cleaner
Cleaner
Public Health· General Hospital:0'. $ 71.40 $ - $ 71.40 $ - $ - $ -
Shawn Campbell
Public Health· laguna Honda0'. $ 289.20 $ - $ 28920 $ $ $Hospital: Char1es
" .Public Health: "'. $ 503.27 $ $ - $ - $ 222.00 $ 28127
Public Health: Ann Ma Bautista Eli $ 900.66 $ - $ $ - $ 584.20 $ 316.46
Public Health: Noreen Tal Eli $ 2,401.11 $ - $ $ - $ 1,496.95 $ 904.16· , ,Public Health: Richard Bitanga $ 21,250.05 $ · $ · $ - $ 20,260.65 $ 989.40
Public Health: Steve Hoffman .,', $ 606.65 $ $ · $ . $ 351.50 $ 455.15
Public Health: Theresa 0'. $ 366.96 $ - $ $ $ - $ 366.96
Public Health: Vilma Posadas II' , $ 272.80 $ · $ $ $ 272.80
Public Utilities Commission- Millbrae: $ 5,016.43 $ · $ · $ - $ 1.666.00 $ 3,350.43Public Utilities Commission~
$ 6,735.78 $ 74.36 $ $ $ $ 6.661.42Newcomb Ave: - ·Public Utilities Commission~ Sunol: $ 2,108.40 $ · $ $ $ 1.154.16 $ 954.24Public Utilities Commission~ Wpcd: II' , $ 11,002.81 $ $ · $ 11,002.81 $ ·Public Utilities Commission: $ 9,289.50 $ $ $ 1.002.00 $ $ 8,287.50,Public Utilities Commission: Andy
,p••' ". $ 3,266.32 . $ $ 146.32 $ - $ $ 3,120.00
Public Utilities Commission: George 0', $ 2,068.00 S - $ 2.068.00 $ - $ $ - $ $DunanPublic Utilities Commission: Mike o· $ 166.80 $ $ $ $ 166.80 $ $ $Stez
.Public Utilities Commission: Tomio
0'. $ 957.60 $ 957.60 $ $ $T.'••o;,. - ·Public Works: Benjamin Santana : $ 415.80 $ 415.80 $ $ - $ ·Public Works: Brooks Fenton 0'. '$ 148.80 $ 148.80 $ $ - $ ·Public Works: Joel Prather ~. $ 2,019.30 $ 1,395.60 $ 623.70 $ $ $
Public Works: John Lee II' , , , '$ 16,059.00 $ 16,059.00 $ $ $Public Works: Joseph Stelmak · , ' ~ $ 52,782.05 $ 231.20 $ 177.00 $ 3,342.54 $ $ 40,506.20 $ 8.525.11
Public Works: Miguel Govea • "'. ~ $ 1,622.70 $ 669.60 $ $ 504.90 $ 448.20
Public Works: Mohammad Khattana .. ~ ··i $ 3,252.28 $ 22.96 $ 446.50 $ $ 1,398.40 $ 1,384.42
Public Works: Otis Williams ~~,~- $ 13.593.10 $ 1,010.00 $ $ $ 6.308.30 $ 6,274.80
Real Estate- 501 Stanyan St: ~~ $ 17,928.90 $ - $ 11.799.40 $ · $ 6.129.50
Real Estate- Opera House: ' , $ 7,481.50 $ - $ 7,122.70 $ $ 358.80
Real Estate- War Memorial: $ 6,409.00 $ $ 1.625.00 $ - $ 4.784.00
Real Estate: ~t, $ 45,302.43 $ $ . $ 27,810.80 $ 17,491.63
Real Estate: Joseoh Stelmak ii,%~ $ 59,281.46 $ 1.515.00 $ 1.728.90 $ $ 36.066.92 $ 19,970.64Real Estate: Michael Hanson "i' $ 23,601.50 5 672.70 $ 245.70 $ 324.00 $ · $ 3,649.90 $ 12,815.62 $ 5,860.60 $ 32.98Real Estate: Otis Williams · ' $ 17,092.80 $ - $ 1,010.00 $ - $ 229.60 $ 2.157.00 $ - $ 13,241\.00 $ 448.20Real Estate: Victor Serrato · . 36781.17 $ - . $ $ 172.89 $ $ 35.324.78 1.283.50
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 11 of22
%REQUIRED
PROHIBITEDThe City thanks all Champion that %Green
Green Total by City REQUIREDDegreaser
PROHIBITEDREQUIRED
GeneralREQUIRED PROHIBITED REQUIRED
REQUIRED REQUIRED PROHIBITEDbought green cleaners &janitorial byby Dept. Staff Bathroom
(LiquidDegreasers
GeneralPurpose
Glass GLASS Toilet SeatTailet Tissue Paper Towels PAPERSpapers Customer Sunshine Purpose Cleaner Cleaner Cover
Team Cleaner777) Cleaner Cleaner
Ree &Park~ 100 larkin St.: II' , $ 15,662.40 $ $ 15,662.40 $• 0'0' 0' g, O' $ 48,707.20 $ ! 18,973.00 $ $ 29,734.20
Ree &Park~ Moscone Center: t1' , $ 2,499.00 S S 2.499,00 !Ree &Park: Al Hardy f1' , $ 315.40 ! ! · $ 315.40Ree &Park.: Albert Khoo ,'. $ 3,431.75 $ S $ 485.75 ! 2.946.00Ree &Park: Benny Jarvis ", $ 3,917.50 $ $ · ! 1.490.70 S 2,426.80Ree &Park: Bill Chapman ' " $ 3,197.10 S S · ! 1,442.70 $ 1.754.40Ree &Park: Brent Dennis fI' , $ 55.50 ! · $ · ! 55.50Ree &Park.: Claudia Rhinehart ". $ 5,782,00 ! ! · ! · $ 5,782.00
Ree &Park: Cliff Hsiang $ 17,546.62 $ $ · $ 2,908,52 $ 14,638.10Ree &Park: Dan Mui ", $ 97,788.92 $ 4,463,52 $ 1,670.40 $ 5,763.00 $ · $ · $ 85,892.00Ree &Park: Danny II' , $ 406.40 $ $ · $ 406.40Ree &Park: David Clifton ", $ 172.82 $ $ · $ · $ 172.82Ree &Park: Davida Kapler ,', , $ 570.90 $ $ $ · $ 570.90
Rec &Park: Eladio Mateo ", $ 1,295.00 $ $ $ 388.60 $ 906.40Rec &Pari<: John Miller ", $ 79.52 $ · $ · $ · $ 79,52
Rec &Park: Keneth Emeka ", $ 695.00 $ $ · $ · $ 695.00Rec &Pari<: Lany I'. $ 1,842.00 8 $ · $ · $ 1,842,00
Rec &Park: Martha Scaler $ 3,763.99 $ $ $ 2,499.60 $ 1,264.39
Rec &Pari<: Michael Castillo -' " $ 5,373.05 $ · $ · $ 2,301.50 $ 3,071,55
Rec &Park: Michael Gray ~ $ 27,692.80 $ $ · $ 213.40 $ 27,479.40
Rec &Park: Ramiro Rodriguez i!ll~ $ 12,857.60 $ · $ $ 3,150.00 $ 9,707.60Rec &Park: Ricardo Moody ":,.;. $ 2,087.50 $ · $ · $ · $ 2,087.50
Rec &Park: Ricardo Rojas -;,It $ 5,942.60 $ · $ $ 1,943.00 $ 3,999.60
Rec &Park: Robert Sheets ,... " $ 795.20 $ · $ · $ · $ 795.20
Rec &Pari<: Steve Shames .. $ 1,874.30 $ · $ $ 746.90 $ 1,127.40
Rec &Park: Susan Nervo II' , $ 1,486.80 $ · $ $ 1,486,80
Redevelopment Montery Morrissey . u ,$ 5,391.n $ · $ $ 1,207.35 $ 4,184.42.
Sheriff: Daniel Gertsikov .. , $ 13,980.00 $ · $ · $ 12.091.50 $ 1,888.50
Sheriff: Joyce Wong If' , .. ' , $ 78,637.89 $ · $ 62,473.89 $ 16,164.00
Sheriff: Richard Castillo .. $ 26,830,90 $ 1.024,00 $ 446.50 $ · $ 24,134.40 $ 1,226.00Unknown: ' , . , $ 28,389.80 $ 478.80 $ 415.80 S · $ · $ 27,495.00
Grand Total ", .' , $1,516,555.45 $ 707.78 $ 26,039.60 $ 3,504.40 $ 5,192,98 $ 3,434.99 S 2,541.16 $ 2,942.76 S 73.117.47 S392,603.79 $640,589.95 $365,880.57
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 12 of 22
D. All City Champions of Paper 2009.(Reauired Products: 100% Post-Consumer Recvcled Processed ChiThe City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper Totai ~IAUUlt, rooa Ion: l'-IOraen lVlangaoay
"po .: ,e" VI un OV,40V.IAmmal vara (l( \,.,omro : j\jUVI8 tmranos ~ I,/V'.;O
ppea s, ooarv VI \cerml, Mppea s : veClla uang • 4vV.IA"S ommlSSlon: t>naron age '<I{C Ie ~ ""'+.otl1'\sseSSmenl f'lppea Sooaru 01: ne en l.ee • 1/.00IAssessor-Kacor ee BIClano ayumo ~ O,ODV.VOloay f\rea vasl rogram : J8aa JaCKson • IVO.VV
oara vr tiupervlsors: ng ng Gnan ~ ,""omlooara VT \:Iupervlsors: Jill Jay • /v.ov
Ul Ing nspec Ion lJOmmlSSlon: awrence Via 0 > LvV4.LVlouuolng InspeCion:JOSep IneLIU ~ 41 L.OVlowlvlng Inspecuon: anCl8 easey • %LO
10uliOing mspecuon: Olepnen Lee ~ 1,4' 1,0jloureau VI I'\fCnl eClUre: IVlana lVI8m8SeV1CI • I,O'U.OVvnlla, UppO!1 tiervlces: ear o·onen ~ {,,j:}o.uv
II,.,f1l1Uren, TOUm Cit ramlles: Jerry ,)lerra • vOO.'V\,jnllaren, Youm & ramlles: K.ana18 uram ~ bUL."1
Il",oflllaren, lOUin Cit ramlles: LenCla Ulxon > 1,0qj.OUIy orney: \)llaron • 04>.00I Yflliorney: Olepnam Inompson ~ .OV
11..11 Yt"' annlng: LUlU wang • Iv,'fvv.LVIvn tiervlce 1.,;0mmlSSlon: L1zeue ennquez > I,V(
lulVU "ervlce uommlSSlon: "anura eng > IO,VIon rolle S: Angela VV , 11b.U(
luon rolle s: UeOOle oy > l,v'L04on ro er S: oe Nur ssoon rollers: OUlse I\Hgro ,> L,JL IAV
luon roller s: IVle son lVlangrouan, " o".v.
on roue S: MOniCa aura ,. jOb."Vluon rOner S: IVIOnlCa VI u ,. 10/.OV
on rouer S: MOniCa vvu ,> .OVluon roller s: IVlyrna eVan
"
/V.ovon roue s: I"'am nCKson
, " 1,VVb."4luon roue S: ~osanne orre ,> v,04vN
on ro ers: ere a anareaa, " ,L.:JO.VO
ILJIS rIcr Auorney: Mary MCOeVIn ,> LJL. '"lS,nc, "lIorney: "eggle v,ay ,. V,OOU.VVIS rlcr AIlorney: ey aonga ,> 1,04/.0VISlrlcl ..... llorney: "amlr saMal
"
0U,001.4vIS rICt AIlorney: tilepnam Inompson I> JID.VV
eleCtIOns: JUliUS \,;Iawaran"
v,VqUOmergency Managemen : I.,;amma ArCla ,~ I, .0vmergency lV!8nagemen : erml vnau ,> JV'OLmergency lVIanagemenl: \;Irace ullan ,> , 'ou.'vmergency lVlanagemen : JaUa JaCKSOn ,> O"A"mergency lVIanagemenl: anessa \;llanellI
"
'VI.'Vmp oyee e lremem, ves: ea I aVIs '> ",LOO.OVnenammen[ vommlsslon: vrys al "tewan ,> 'jO
nVlfonmen: o-Mmg Ng ,~ L,"00.4VIt:lnles vOmmlSSlon: IVlarvln oro J,V'O.LV
venlS LJepallmenl: t\myes e e o eVI a"
104.'0ven SLJepanmem: l..::relC en ~uue ,> .JOlie: valllY vavey
"
L,CU'.OOIre: uaVlu I n9 ,. 400.Ire: ,Jell ong ,. 1'+,f:;lL.UV
\,jeneral tiervlces Agency- Ans l:iran s: Ijreu l"Jonner"
Ib4.\,;Ieneral "ervlces Agency- ven ral "[lOPS: ~IC erarn ,. L,'OMV\,jeneral tiervlces Agency- oumv Gle,,: Ken on uwyang ,~ "LO,bb\,eneral "ervlces Agency: Uleare uar ey I· 1,000. IV
enera ervlces Agency: I: lza em I I zgerald"
11b.UI\,;Ieneral "ervlces Agency: t:nzaoem I orayce ,> IIO.V/
enera ervlces gency: anm or 0 alyeneral tiervlces Agency: lVIaoellVlarrlneZ 4,14(,jOGenera ervlces gency: arc osaaen ,\,;Ieneral "ervlces Agency: Marla t:spma ,. l,iJO<V6
(,:iOlOen (,:iBIe l"'arK voncourse Autnortty: en t:inOCKey
orine-free)
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 13 of 22
The City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper TotaiealIn; ervlce i:Jys em: l:IIZaDem ~81azar • ',JI ."Balll! oervlce oys em: vamlra I",ausevlc OL.'UBalIn; ervlce ;jys em: ;j'{8nJey ee 0'0.10umao esources: ......nene IVlesaumao Kesources: lVlartln ISlora 1,'1"..uman esources: lOCK IJIlOW , ,w.vvuman bervlces- bUpp yKeom: 10 uSia l.JfUZ ~ I,VOU.VVuman "ervlces: f\T ena \.:lorospe • 'LD,L'".'O
uman :services: oro y an ~ IbO.VVuman ervlces: l..:l'lgllvuevara " L,"OO.Wuman oervlces: Laune asse ~ 1,41".LUumao ervlces: au t"'ameo • 0," 10.OVuman oervlces: lVlsrc I'\osaaen , LV,VQV.(O
umao ervlces: t"'oe an rong ~ , 'lUi::J.JU
umao ;:,ervlces: "srema \,;)a!lareau • OL.OV
umao tiervlces: bnlT ey tjurns 0 L,"00.4Vuvenl e rooa Ion uepaflmen : IVlanny agslslIlan • LOL.OV
~ IV,o'4.4Vuveme rooa Ion: IVianuel t" , I,'I".'Vauor \)lanUarUs: Iwary IVlarZOllO 1.00Boor oranoaras: wmme LO] I,'IV.LL
L1urary: I\am 0 ',vOL.OVL.Iorary: lVlanna Neves IbO.vvL1lJrary: J'lorm vaT Ola , " O.OVL.Iorary: l"lorm arona
'"HiO
Llorary: "aI' anremolO , ..."Mayo 5 ur DUSing: ISB linanSln . , 1.,4L').4V
Mayo s: ...marea OfUSS! '" 'o'uo
wlayo S: tlnurea Druss !, I,UOb.bLMayo S: Armina rown ! • 0,L11.1.IVlaya S: vllar OLle I.::lnmesMayo s: uee lenny er I. ,"j,40IVlaya s: l\8fen enuefson I' ,101.00Mayo S: L8Kelsna I> oM"Mayo S: L8urell:'arSOUl I. I.OL. '",,,ayo s: lV,ave, ""ow I> somIwayo s: IVIlyesna Marvey I. LlV.OJMayo 5: lVlomque roreSler .OVMayo S: lVIomque rorster I. ,IOV.IVIVlaya S: IVlomque rOS ar
"
ooo."VMemea xammer: bue Keuer I> L,O"UoIVl60lcai t:xammer: i:>usan t\eller I· 'Oq.IOmumClpa alway: 81Sy va as 10 ',LVU.VVIVlUnlClpal ranporra Ion Auman ar 109 61 I farrlC; IVll Ie L-n8n I. 101.OVlV1UnlClpai ranpOrlallon MUllion ~ r-ar Iflg 0: I Tallie: erry ve apaz I. OL.bVMUniCipal ranpon:a Ion Auman ~ I"'ar log <Sr. 1TarrlC: vvel vnen i. O"."VlVlUnlClpaJ ranspona IOn flgency- C.leCtrlc: f'\.lua vorpuz i· v.o'o.ooMUnlClpa ranspona Ion Agency- acmc: Anme t\n1gm i~ oOb."V1YIUnlClpa ranspona Ion flgency~ I:lecmc: \..rarOI \..rllen i· 'OQ.ov:IVlUnlClpa ransporta Ion Agency~ ecmc: ualsy AvalOS i> '+,UDI.OVilVIUnlClpa ranspo a Ion flgency~ I:lecmc: uaVlu uanoury i' ,"v.40iMUnlClpa ranspo a Ion Agency- ecmc: ueora l:Sen on I> 04'l.bDilVlUnlClpa ranspo alonAgency~tleClnc; ueloreuarey i. I,J"1.0'ilvlUnlClpa ranspo a Ion flgency~ I:leClnc: uelrure uar ey i. ,oUU,Ub
IIVlUnlClpa ranspo a Ion Agency~ ecmc: uennls i> 1,'+r~;UV
!lVlUniClpa ranspo a Ion flgency- I:lecmc: uoroUlY \..rllan ,J,oo~.uv
iMUnlClpa ranspo a Ion Agency- acmc: to lame '"0'"11VIumCIpa ranspo a Ion flgency~ l:lecmc: l:Uen 1YloJlca • I,J"J.Q"11VlumCIpa ranspo a Ion geney- ecmc: tuen I"'on > , bU.
IlVIumClpa ranspo a Ion Agency~ l:lecmc: l:lIen on > JOO."UIlVIumclpa ranspo a Ion geney- ec nc: rumlKo aooa > 4,4jI.oUIlVlumClpa ranspo a Ion Agency~ l:lecmc: I.:Ilgl t'aoros • O.OOIAO
umclpa ranspo a Ion geney- ec nc: enry ong • "LMbIIVlumClpa ranspo a Ion Agency- l:lecmc: Merman oaumann > 'O'.LO
umclpa ranspo a Ion geney- ec nc: Howara I aumann > 404.LD11VlumCIpai Iranspo a Ion Agency~ l:lecmc: Jane{ vVllson , II J.OU
UDlClpa ranspo a Ion gency~ t:.Iecmc: Jeanette WI son • ,LlO..11Vlumcipa ranspo a Ion Agency~ l:lecmc: JeSSie l\alZ • ',JOq. '0IlVlumclpa ranspo auon "geney- ",ec,ne: ,oery aClonIlVlumclpa ranspo a Ion Agency- ecmc: l\ainryn !\llcono as > II.JO
101512010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasmg Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 14 of 22
The City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper TotaiIMUnlClpa ranspo aIon Agency~ t:lec fie: aura [nang , "ZO,OCIlVIUnJClpa ranspo aIon gency~ t:.lec flC: LUCille nammons > LIV.OOIIVlUnlClpa ranspo aJon Agency- l:leo flC: Manna vmena , 11b.VIIIVIUnlClpa: Iranspo a Jon f\gency- t:.IBe ne: aU! nOO man , IIMVIMUnlClpa ranspo aJon Agency- l:lec nc: Kosanna u , IIj,oVIIV/umClpal Iranspo aJOn Agency- l:IBC ne: \)8nur8 vnau > IIMVIMumClpa ranspo aJOn geney- ee nc: ;:janara I..inua • O,IO',VVIlVlumClpa ranspo a Ion Agency- t:leo nc: uSia J'l8Kmengc ann , II 0.0VIMUnlClpal I ranspo a Ion tlgency- cleo ne: vvel vllen • L,"OO'VIMUnlClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency~ l:leG no: vene orras , jOb,"VpVlumClpal Iranspo a Ion geney- arl\mg Ot Tallie: va eSte .....US fla IVlarKS > I,"".LVIMUnlClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency- 8TKlng &. fallle: eDDie tmnnne , "ZoobIIV1umCIpai Iranspo a Ion Agency~ an"mg c< ralllc: James HSlong • q,qOi.OVIMUnlClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency~ tJarKmg & raTTlc: ern uelapaz ~ 1,10UJVPVIUnJClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency~ arKmg c< ramc: eny ue apaz • L,OO,j.04
I'"UnlClpa, I ranspOllalon "geney- aXI (X /"\ccess : vJC"y "IU • '.O,LIIlVIUnJClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency~ aXI (l( Access: VICKY \::iIU • z/UMIWlumClpal Iranspo a Ion gency: ,,'oa vorpuz • L,'tOO, IVIMumclpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: Annie Knlgm • oi,oVpVlumclpal Iranspo a Ion geney: ~ary~awson • " ,"O,OVIMUnlCIPai "anspo alon Agency: c;lgwa ros • 1,04/.0'IlVlUnlClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: Joanne 1,'1,'1: lams • ql.iOIMUnlClpa ranspo a Ion gency: oery Naclon • OLO,VUIlVIUniClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: JOSle ueocampo • JO",UUIlvlUniClpal Iranspo a Ion ~gency: L.IZZ nOlman • O.MLIlVlumClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: NIC Dlas JO nson • LbLOUIlVlUnlClpal Iranspo a Ion gency: "anura vllua • ",".OUIMumClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: anora \.iIU • JIO,UU1,IVIUniClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: "USle J''lal'\[]lengcnanll • qIO.LOIMUniClpal Iranspo a Ion Agency: wei \.inen • I, onuIVlIIce VI von rams AurnlmSlra Ion: flOme Leary • "MOUTTlce UT \.ion rac SAommlstra Ion: armen LmranvITIce vr von rac SAomimsuauon: Icnelle HI arlo , II J,OVIVilice VI vonUac\s KumlnlSlra Ion: IC e e lara 0 Ooo.ov
ollce~ I Izen Svomp am s: aura am • l,bb0,blollce: cOc eLerson • .00.•Vollce: KeVin MCp erson • 'I"J'<Oollce: Leon I\8ng • ,OI,LO'ouce: LUCY \.ilemmOns • 1,4/B.ZVollce: Lynn t\ellIY • 'OI,LOollce: l"Iene I'\ourlquez 0 NO,'"'ouce: 11m ee , qOq,ZOalice: VlcLor 1'\0Ulenuerg • IOO,LL,,1
'on:: \.;:ieorge unyemem • IL,I .bV
Oil: \.:Ieorge vnyememn , I,'H',LVuOlle ueren er: Ange a Auyong • IMUL.DVUOIlC uerenoer: Jonn uunoar , LM','V'UOIlC ueren er: ynn Mecnamc • '"0.40UOIlC Heann~ \.;:ieneral I OSPI al: Aloa IVla U0 • Oq,IOUUIIC neallll- ...,eneral I OSpl al: Allan r;,enl'\en • .O'.LO'UOIlC Healm~ \.;:ieneral I OSPI al: Almea Kacner > '"J.40UUIIC neaJlll~ \.:Ieneral I OSPI al: Amy uemomeverue > I,VOO,OL'UOIlC Heann· benerall OSpl al: Amy walKer • 00","'UOIlC Healln~ ",eneral I OSpl al: Anna r;U010 • 10,VI'UOIlC Heann~ benerall OSpl at An omna ADa • '"j.4b'UOIlC Hearm~ ",eneral I OSPI al: oamara t\nuu , 4, :OO."UUOlle nea,u,- ~enerall OSPI a,: 000 "gg es,on > .U',OL'UOIlC Healm- \,:Jenerall OSPI HI: vansa vefiOiano ~ II.JOUUlIC nealU I~ \,;leneral I aspi al: var Os "a azar • "LO.OOUDIlC Healm~ \jenerall osplal: vnar es ren > JZ/ ,"0UUIIC nealUJ~ ...,eneral I aspi ,al: vJ leryl venson > '00.'0
'UOUC Healln~ \jenerall aspl HI: vnns Ine leu ~ ,04l,bVUUIIC nealllJ~ \.:Ieneral I OSpl aJ: ualSY anas • LOL. '"
'UDIlC Healm~ \.;:ienerall Osplal: ueoora KODlnSOn , I,OUO,"IUullC HeallJJ~ \.:Ienerall OSPI Bl: vonna \.:Iurr > OV',OL'UDIlC Healm· l3enerall OSPI al: Ser Armstrong > .OUUollC HealUl~ \.:Ieneral I OSPI al: alma Ascana , I';:;lJ.tIO'UOIlC Heann- benerall aspl HI: alma Lau'UOI1C Heallf1~ ",eneral I OSPI aJ: ranclsco "aenz , JbLVL'UOIlC Heal!n~ benerall OSPI at vy bO oman I.VO
101512010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 15 of 22
The City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper TotaiUDUC HealInw t..::ieneral HOSpl 81: Jane! I mes I> ,00UUllC neallllw \.:leneral naspt 81: Jennie nnll I· 0.1.00
UOUC Healtnw \jeneral Haspl 81: Jimmy HO I. 'A"UUlIC neallflw ",eneral Haspl 81; Jon uean \.:Irean I· onooUDUC Healtnw \.:jeneral HaSpl 81; JU 10 l:iUIUen I. ZjL14uOlle nea,Ul- "ener., nospl al: Lang Nguyen I· IIO,VfU Ie ea - anera aspla: arry a Ian I· I,OVO,",uouc neallnw \::Jeneral HOSpl a: Laura I. '"HOUIJIIC nealUlw \.:;Jeneral nespi 81; L.aUra ""'HOW I· o ",V'UOIIC HealInw \jenerat HOSpl a: willY Lee I> jOb,"OUUllC nealUl- "eneral Haspl 81: LIla orres ,; O,OfO,LVUOliC HeaIIn-l.:ienerat HOSpl a: ua HOODS (( ',OvUuuc neallll- \.:leneTa, Haspl a: JVlargo UeXlrase I. 00',UDlIC nealln- \.:;jeneral HOSpl a: Man au omlOaD I> zmoouolle neallfl- "enera, nospi a: IVlary \ "OIgl aJe I· (( o,ovUOliC Healtn- \jenerat HOSpl a: Matt Luana , ',""",LjUOliC nealm- \.,:leneTal Haspl a: wile ael Knoaaes I. "i4,"iU Ie ea - anera OSPI a; lagros amos I' '"',LOUOllC HealmM l.:ieneral HOSpl a; IVllreya Lopez I> ((,00UulIC HealUl-\.:leneral HOSpl a: l"lancy Law I> II .,OVUDlIC HealmM !,jeneral HOSpl a: NOKeo Nmngsavam I. 00,0"UUHC HealU1M \.:leneral HOSpl a: l'lorma ulmeucrvOnez ,> '00UOHC Heaan- !,jeneral Haspl a: Nuna L810lvar '> b41,oO
UOIIC HealUl-l1eneral Haspl a: al00rg ,> 110,0'vOile Healtn- beneral HOSpl a: eeggy MO I.UOIIC e8Itn-l.:ieneralHaspla: eer mlm '> O"OAiUUIIC Heallll-\.:leneral Haspl a: een aoraganza ,> .V~,vi
UOIIC ealm- l.:iener8! Haspl a: Kacnel AInZa"
"iO,',UUIIC ealUI-l1eneralHaspla: euecca r-aull a ,> L,IVO,."uonc eann- !,jenera! Haspl a: Kemy amme ,. bbU,'buunc eallfl-l1eneralHaspla: ena ong ,> 10',10uonc ealtn M t,;eneral HOSpl a: Kon l5ear ,. '",U4uonc ealtn- l..:lener81 HOSpl a: Koxana amas
"
000,""UUIIC ealln- \.:leneral HOSpl a: vara \.:lraCla
"
II ,'0UOIIC ealIn- !,jeneral HOSpl a: tinlr ey ee ,. {{ ',OVUUIIC eallrl-l1eneral HOSpl a: vuzanne r-un
"
10,V,UOUC eann-l.:ieneralHOSpla: aunn Jones '> 'U",biUOIlC eallfl-l1eneralHOSpla: onya I f1ompson
"
'"',0'UOIlC eann-l,jeneral HOSpl a: WHey IJmng I> {{',beUOIlC ealUl- lVlemal I ealln ooaro: nowaro ! ang " 1f,0LMVU Ie ea Ieen Marsnall '> 1,4,"-ZUUOIIC eallnll 0: wallY ,. I,",","VUwlC eallll: MIICla vaVlu ,.UOIlC ealln: "my Kwan ,. Z,ollAVUuUC eallll: oaruara l"eZUC a
"
I,",',LVuonc ealtn: tsella 06 > 0',""UOIlC eallll: oernaoeue ;; I,",',LVUOIlC ealtn: tlernene vvm e • L,"b0.4UUDIlC ealln: armen :; '"0"0UulIC ealUl: ......armen l'lOlaSCO > O"O,i'UOIlC ealm: linns > I,,"i,b"UUIIC eallll: ...... llnS 18 :; L'V,OOUOl1C ealln: linns la Mea • DUMUU!lC ealm: ...... rlflS Ina • LIOOO
UOliC ealm: linns Ina IVlea :; joo,"VUOIIC ealm: vonuon KoOenson > ,)oo"vUOliC eaan: lOnnie :; 'WbLUOIIC e8lm: uana enoerson > 00.0'UUllC eallll: vevra IVlaLUlews • 1,.",0"UOliC ealm: eora Maunews > 1,loVJvUUIIC eaml: uOfa ......rlang • 1,0'0,01UOliC ealln: alna linin > jOo,'VUo!lC ealll1: t:ua \.:lurumenol > L,OOJ.Uo
UOliC ealm: !zaoern vvon > {o,bUUo!lC eal\l1; ranK > OVL,",UOliC ealm; ranK I"'lnel! • LjL'"UUIIC eallll; Jane
" O"O,LIUOUC ealm: Jane linu ~ joo,""Uul1C eallH: Jerry vierra > If O,OVUOUC ealm: Jn enaan > L,Oj","U
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasrng Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 16 of 22
The City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper TotalUUIIO neanu; ,Joanne , 0'.'"UOHC Heann: JO n 1Vl8mnez > 4,OL4.0UUUIIO neallll: JosepHine IVIUlr ; I,LIO.UOIIO Heann: JOy t\enanx " IIjm
UUIIO Heallll: I'\aren IVICl\enZle , "0'+.'0uOlle Healin: t\8 e MOniCO Klein JOb.8UUullO Heallll; l\f1S , DUN
uOlle H881m: Kflsun8 KellY > ;,6'11:)."10
UullO Healln: L8nnle f\Uelman , I,V000'uOlle Heann: Mana Kogers "uone Healln: IVlan au uuoley " JOo.8UUUIIO H88m I: IVle e L.au~;:)mIUi 0 000."VuOlle Healln: lVIl a Ivuranaa > no.ulUUIIO Heallll: 1\lICKle • 10'+./0UOliC Healtn: NICKY HO > Ib4.lb
UOIIO Healln: 1\lIKKle > 10".10uOlle Healtn: Noreen al > "Ob.8UUullO Healln: ur anoo 1010811 • I,'''O.LUU IC ea : Ie ar ara! e 0 I,",".LVUOIIO Healln: Kose aupopo > <,OOMUUVIIC nea",,: Olep anle vupuy • I. '" I,V0uOlle He8lm: lOa ICKS > I,IOU.IUUUIIO Healln: amas IVlsrraro • OOV.00UOIIO Healln: rue vo > 404.LOUvIIC nea,u': Vl allY > L,VOV.OI
UOliC Healtn: vvallY vvong > LUb.LUUOIIO Healln: J\180X18 Lnu • OOO.OVUUIIO I.llJrary: orm varo a • L0L.
uonc UIII les I,.,OmmlSSlon MealIn Ana ;:;aTelY: ;:;Iepnen l:'rOOKS > LOLI4UUlIC ulil les vommlsSlon~ elC" I elellY: oay emera,v > L,IOO.•.uonc UI! I les I,.,OmmlSSlon~ MeIcn I e cny: Kuay vvnne > l,b80.0U
UullC vlliles ,",Onlmlsslon:nua: f'lussell "a,al • , ILO.•VUOIlC UI! lies \jommISSlon~ a Hon a: ;:;tamey ee > LJ,eol.LUUullC uu lies vommlSSlon~ er: I-\nurew vng > L,VOUOUDIlC UtilleS \jommlsslon~ waIer wuallIY: vo son Kwan > JU".bLUOIlC VI! Jles vommlsslon~ VValer t../ua I y: \:llona l:ng > 104./0
U Ie Illes ommlsslon~ a er ual y: aura re aUOUC VlIllUes I,.,OmmlSSlon~ VVaIer wua I Isa I,.,nan > L,jL I.4UUUlIC ullJJeS \.Iommlss!on~ VI aler \"Iua I : 1V",e ~ellog '0 00.0.'UOllC VI! lies l,.,ommlSSlon~ waIer \..lua I : U Y once > L,bOj.04
UOIlC vU lies vommlSSlon: I-InnaOelle \.Iaunan"
JOOOOUOllC VtI I les ljOmmlSSlon: erOice !:jasco " JU8.oLUUIJC VUIJes \.IommlSSlon: l:'8m Ison
"
"-LOUUIJC ulilies \.IommrsSlOn: Diu vaponera ,0 000'VUUIJC UUI res \.JommISSlOn: liarmeura Navarro ' 0 LjL.14
UUIJC ulilies \.IommlSSlon: \.IlIns Ina"
L0L.
UOUC Ull lies ljOmmlSSlon: \jnns Ina I,.,as ro " oJ8.0L
UullC vLllles \.IommlSSlOn: \.Ionme vllang ,> OOO.•VUOllC un I res ljOmmlSSJOn: ela \..lUlmero , 0 -14,LlJU.
UOUC Vlliles liommlSSlon: l:lma Dung ! • O£fQ-AV
UOliC UIII les \jommISSlon: ugene ::;nu ! , ·(jb.UU
UOllC un lies 1,.,0mmlSSlon: ranK rana I> O,UIO.IUUUIIC Vlliles vommlSSlon: I.:Ilgl oorromeo !< "000.UOliC UIlIles L;ommISSlon: owara I erKlns 10 0,/14.0U
UUIIC vlliles vommlSSlon: James nSlong I· ,",'.LVUOIIC un lies L;ommISSlon: Janel cillO I> ,"44.14UulIC vu lies \.Iommlssron: Josepn <::>lngll I> 041.00UOliC unlles \jommISSlon: JOssy !:jayo I' IUMbUllIIC vn lies \.IommlSSlon: JU Ie II/larK I. 000.10UOliC unlles c.;ommISSlon: Kaml e Harvey I. b,V!MOUllIIC Vlll res \.Iommlsslon: amy oasconclUo I> O.OIL.OIUOIIC un lies \jommISSlon: Kamy l;josconClIIO I> I, .OUUUIIC vull res vommlSSlon: Lorelei I> 10MIUOIIC UIII les \jommISSlon: Mafia l.:iarCla I> I, .OU
UoliC VI! lies \.IommlSSlon: Marla vy vester I' 1,",0.10UOliC UIIlies \jommISSlon: Mana ::;yvesIOfUOliC VIII les 1,.,0mmlSSlon: lVlIcnael I en on JOO."VU Ie Illes ommlSSlon: Ie en on 00O."VUDIlC UIIlies L;ommISSlOn: MOllY tioae ,LUI."4UUIJC ulilies \.IommlSSlon: ancy DOle I> 0,V"V."V
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasmg Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 17 of 22
The City Thanks These City Champions That Bought Green Paper TotalUDlIC Uililies L>OmrnISS10n: Nora IVIO Ina
"
OIV,OOUOllC UIIII les ornmlSSlon: acnelle More ,~ jOb,"UUDIIC uUllles lJOmmlSSlon: ,,6060CB I> ,LvOVOU Ie Ie. ommlSSlon: e ecca na ,~ L,j( '."UUDJlC VIII les ommlSSlon: !i.eceJVmg I> 10'.'0UuJlC VUI les lvommlSSlon: an fa ooe I,UDJlG VIII les vommlSSlon: anay"g ,. L,"'",10UuJlG Ulil les LtOmmiSSlon: ;:lera \..to inS
"
voo.•vUDJlC VlII les ommlSSlon: bOlf ey blmp"ano '> IIO.VIuullC uullies l.oOmmlSSlon: vruf ey "ymp lanD ,> ILv,ILUOIlC utilities GOmmlSSlon: ;step en tlroOKS "',UOIlC uU!lues l,.,ommlSSlon: eresa 012 ,> voo."OU Ie Illes liommlsslon: ony LUjan ,. 1,41",
UOIlC UWlies vommlSSlon: any LUJane ,> 100.VVU Ie Illes ommlSSfon: aene QUI ar I. JOO,""uouc UUII les t.,..ommISSlon: verma wanon I. I,WO.OOUUlIC ullilies \..tommISSlon: VIClor IVlana I' o,ov,J.ovUOIlC worKS: Aoa AOeflJl8 I. 0,0UO,"0UoUC vvorl\S: oemarul a t:spawlIa I· ",'OI,OVUOllC worKS: tsrannon wong I~ /00.1UOUC VlorKS: vamenne I> OOV.OOUUIIC VI or S: ayon oy I~ 4,4jl.DUUOliC VVorKS: Josepn AlOe 0 I> 000,'VUUIIC Vlorl\s: r\aUlenne l'iICIlO as I~ bOU,jbUOllC vvorKS: I\amenne won , ,OLI ,J'UullC VI orKS: L.1Sa lVlal\ • 4, Itl.1V
uOlle VVOrK': Mary "gwe • ,III.U,UUHC VI orl\s: IVUC ael vvasn 0 II v,ovUOIIC WorKS: Nancy lieorge jo.o"UOIIC VI orKS: l'iancy Ierranava • "00.10U Ie or S: a an a " JDb.""UOIlC VI arKS: Kaymono Lee " 1,010,'0UUIIC orl\li: oa"y Iuan , j"",OLUOIlC vvorKS: Laloa liamacno , OO/./J
I"eal t:S a e~ vvar IVlemona: ,Joyce rUr OUgn • L,IOOO'IKea11 sa e: Lon Mazzo a ~ I.JLI.I"eal t:S ae: vvennle • LOL, I'
ea Sae: ennle \,jOlumna ~ 1,4Iu,aI"eal t:S ae: vV!Onle LOI • IIO.V/
ecreallon ar: ane anJa • 001.00IKecreaIlon 6;, arK: ;;nern , '0'+,1.0
ecreallon (X, arl\: eu uaVIS • '''I,bUecreaIlon 6;, arK: vvmney t1agoy 0 IJ,t.bUbemooaru: allIY 0 vllau • v,onLv
onerm, on~ : lianJsna mlln ° I.,OOJ.O'"nerm; on-vI : ueura "eeu " ,,,""V,
en - : Joan ::>cannell • jOb,"U;;nerm, on-v I : UIQlliaUterUCCIO 0 IJOV.;)nenll 'Oil-V' : lV,aryveu I cang • ,. ,UI;;nerm; on-v', : aran lileseKe • 00b,'U"flerU! ;Oil-V' : veronica r\eJler • 10,V'::;nerm· on-v1 : VVI lam em ~ «,1.'".40"nenn: Armina t1rown • 'vLLO
en : an ros Ie· ayor • ,j'iO.VU;,nenrr: lVIaryoem Long > Oqq"L
eellno agy- ~epro: c,y oU anaol ",bbj,bUeennoogy- epro: JU Ie lireer J,UI .aueellno ogy- ~epro: oa"a aerma Lb,"UMbee noagy: aniellVlOfflS JOO."Vee no ogy: -nllp ~U••O ,> L,OOMVee no ogy: KOOIn are '0 ,I.&UOreasureslanu uev UlII: I'IKKllvey ,. vOQ.'V
. reasurer ax oneCtor: Janet Win er '0 14,1"LUUvvar IVlemonal Anu t"errormlng ArtS vemer: Joyce urougll
"
I'O,LOran a I ~ 111/i,lU4,.:I1
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff· SFApproved.org Page 18 of 22
E. Details of Contracts & Products in 2009 SF Approved List
Category Sub·Categories , ,, ....
Automotive Antifreeze New subcategory SuggestedFluids Brake Cleaners New subcategory Suggested
Carburetor Cleaners New subcategory Suggested
Degreasers New subcategory Suggested
Parts Washers New subcategory Suggested
Automotive Mud Flaps New subcategory SuggestedSupplies & Refillable Can I Sprayer New subcategory SuggestedEquipment
Shop Towels New subcategory Suggested
Tires New sUbcategory Suggested
Wheel Weights New subcategory Suggested
Automotives Alternative Fuel contract Required
Batteries Rechargeables- Hybrid New subcategory Suggested
Rechargeables- NimH (Office (Office Supplies Required
Alkalines Supplies Contract) Limited Use
Ni-Cad Prohibited
Building New subcategory Suggested
Electronics Computers New subcategory Contract Required
Netbooks New subcategory Required
Computer servers (non New subcategory Required
Copiers, Printers, Contract Required
Electronics Electronics Cleaners New subcategory SuggestedCleaners Air Blowers New subcategory Suggested
Coil Cleaners New subcategory Suggested
Degreasers New subcategory Suggested
Vacuums (hand·held) New subcategory Suggested
Food Meetings, Events New subcategory Suggested
Foodware Aluminum Contract Required
Bags Required
Clamshells Required
Cold Cups Required
Eating Utensils Required
Food Wrapping Required
Hot Cups Required
Paper Napkins And Required
Paper Plates, Required
Fuei Biodiesel Contract Required
Janitorial Bathroom Contract RequiredCleaners Cleaner Degreasers Required
General Purpose Required
Glass Cleaners Required
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff ~ SFApproved.org Page 19 of 22
Category Sub-Categories .. . -.. -'I • • • f I .. ", .
Bowl Cleaners: Acid Suggested
Bowl Cleaners: Non- . Suggested
Carpet Cleaners Suggested
Disinfectants Suggested
Drain Openers Suggested
Floor Finishes Suggested
Floor Strippers Suggested
Hand Soaps Suggested
Metal Cleaners Suggested
Odor Control for Drains Suggested
Tile &Grout Cleaners Suggested
Janitorial Paper Towels Contract RequiredPapers Toilet Seat Covers Required
ToiletTissue Required
Janitorial Contract Language New subcategory Suggested
Janitorial Hand Dryers: Electric SuggestedSupplies Microfiber cloths, Suggested
Landscaping Compost New subcategory Suggested
Edging (Lawn & New subcategory Suggested
Fertilizers New subcategory Suggested
Hoses (Garden & New subcategory Suggested
Mulch New subcategory Suggested
Lighting Fixtures New subcateaorv New Contract Reauired Limited Use ProhibitedBallasts Contract Reauired Limited Use ProhibitedBulbs Tubes Renuired Limited Use Prohibited
Lubricants,Oil Motor Oil (Re-refined) New subcategory Suggested
Movers Reusable Boxes New subcategory Suggested
Office Papers Copier Bond
Office Various (Includes New ContractSupplies Markers: Permanent Suggested
Markers: Whiteboard Suggested
Paper: white, 8.5" X11" Contract Required
Paper: white, 8.5" X14" Required
Paper: white, 11" X17 Required
Sanitizers Suggested
Paints Green Seal Certified New subcategory Suggested
Paint Graffiti Removers New subcategory Suggested
Paint Acetone New subcategory Suggested
Toner Remanufactured Contract Suggested
Wood Forest Stewardship New subcategory Suggested
Arsenic-Treated Limited Use
TOTAL 80 34 3 13 30 48 6 5
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff w SFApproved.org Page 20 of 22
City Purchases of Green Office Supplies 2009Ranked by sales volume for 50 most popular categories. % green for each category are calculated by doliars spent.* From Office Depot sales reports.
SITE SPECIFIC SPECIALS -$13.764- -------
calendars - no recycled content option listed12 CALENDAR, DESK WALL, REFILLS, DATED $12,476 YES 83.00%3 CALENDAR, TIME MGMT, ORGANIZERS, REFILLS, DATED $4,194 YES 83.00%4 LUNCHROOM EQUIP SUPPLIES (FOOD SERVICE,PPR,PLAST $2,8065 FILE FOLDERS - TOP TAB $2,788 YES 98.00%6 TAPE,TAPE DISPENSERS $2,4707 BINDERS, PRESENTATION, VIEW $2,393 YES 88.00%8 POST IT, FLAGS, PADS, EASELS $2,386 YES 19.00%9 PEN,BALLPOINT,EXECUTlVE,SETS, CUSTOM INK, INK CL $2,322 YES 40.00% includes refillable or recycled content
10 CLEANER,DISINFECT,DEODORIZER $2,199 specmcation needed11 INDEXES, DIVIDERS, INDEX TABS $2,166 YES 81.00%12 SAFETY,FIRST AID,CROWD CNTRL,INTERCM,SEC $2,12913 LABELS, SHEET, MAILING, SPECIALTY $1,918 recycled content should be available14 BOOK,ACCOUNTING,COLUMNAR,RECORD,RECORD KEEPING SYS $1,819 YES 10.00%15 STORAGE BOXES,FILES,DRWR,SYSTEMS $1,669 YES 97.00%16 ENVELOPES CUSTOM $1,644 YES 22.00%17 MAILROOM,SHIPPING,CORRAGATED BOXES,KNIVES $1,205 SOME mixed category--can't compare18 COMPUTER TAPE,DISKETTES,CD,MAG CARD STORAGE $1,193 SOME mixed category..can't compare19 BOARD,CHALK,BULLETIN,DRY ERASE $1,176 SOME mixed category.can't measure20 PAD,WRITING,LEGAL,LETTER $1,018 YES 25.00%21 STAPLERS,STAPLES,STAPLE REMOVER, STAPLE GUNS $98522 CALULATORS ACCESSORIES $98123 CORRECTION FLUIDS,PENS,PAPER,TAPE $962 SOME mixed category-can't compare24 MEMORY DRIVES $94025 HANGING FILE FOLOERS $883 YES 97.00%26 LETTERING MACHINE,TAPE CTRG,SUPPLlES,LABELERS $868 SOME mixed category-can't compare27 DESK ACCESSORIES/ORGANIZERS, BOOKENDS, STANDS, ACC $801 YES 17,00%28 PAPER FASTENERS, CLIPS, CLAMPS, SPINDLES, DISPENS $791 SOME mixed category-can't compare29 SKIN, SOAP, LOTION, DISP. $74730 DISCONTINUED BY MANUFACTURER $68631 MARKERS $684 YES 73.00% satisfactory spec does not exist32 AIR CLEANER $67933 EXPANDING FILES $596 YES 98.00%34 OEM Toner Cartridges $544 separate cartridge contract exists35 BINDING,LAMINATING MACHINE SUPPLIES $539 SOME mixed category--can't compare36 FACSIMILE MACHINE $52237 BATTERIES CHARGERS $506 YES 50,00% Nonrechargeable required for some uses38 PAPER PUNCH, DRILL $45539 AEROSOLS $452 spec needed w mostly air fresheners40 BINDERS, REFERENCE STORAGE, NON VIEW $444 YES 93.00%41 HEATER,FAN,AIR CLNR,HUMDFRS $44042 CALENDAR, DESK WALL, REFILLS, UNDATED $408 YES 97,00%
101512010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page21of22
NOTEBOOK,MEMO,WB,BOUND I $407HIGHLIGHTERS I $403DISC JANITORIALITEMS I $391SIGNS,ELECTRONIC SIGNS I $370GLOVES,APRONS I $354REPORT COVERS, PORTFOLIOS I $352 I YES I 73.00%
49 I SHREDDER,SHREDDER BAGS ACCESSORIES I $351• %Green" for fhis calculafion includes primarily any ifems wifh posfconsumer waste recycled content. It also includes "AP Certified NonToxic, Conforms to ASTM D4236" (some with "water-based" designation), "Green Seal Certified, contains 30% postconsumer recycled content" (some paper products), and "refillable" (forballpoint pens). A breakdown of actual recycled contents purchased can be found below,
10/5/2010 2009 Annual Report on Green Purchasing Program for City Staff - SFApproved.org Page 22 of22
-,.,<
*-,..
San Francisco Board of Supervisors
\[ Ie \\.... /L---' J
San Francisco, CA 94102
/f4 ~tl
L\ .t: \{d ,,\ ~'JG ~W/,,
O~S\'JN~(\::I N'iS '" "S'dOS\I\'rl~,l,\,S ;\Q Cid'l Ot]
03}\\3:) ,:18
1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place
- OCT13
2010Itt...
Why I care about St. LUke's Hospital/Why I am against CPMC's current plan:
ILIV.tuF.~~.:r.:~E...u,~~f€..'C.f.E.e.~ ... :f)1.§:.u.H!i~t.I:(Akuu7.IJ.'I.~'!.~.P..uuu.k:Ik.t<;'tJ."'.tJ.Nl'.~~..
~~=~fJt;/~:::~~~t~~4~IGNATURE f..G~~ ~'Iio,,'?>"oATE
. "0'0'" 11~ ',.d:>'C'YOURADDRESSuu"~¢'~,u,uuuuuu
Dear Supervisors:
Please stand up for healthcare justice by opposing CPMC's "Master Plan" for,St. Luke's Hospital and the new Cathedral Hill facility,
California Pacific Medical Center (CPMC) plans on shrinking St. Luke's Hos,pital by 62 percent and segregating most services in the Cathedral Hill area.St. Luke's patients would be offered a lower standard of care. This would bea crippling loss of healthcare resources for our city. CPMC's plans amount tomedical redlining, and would be a tragedy for the many families aroundSt. Luke's Hospital in need of access to quality healthcare services in ourcommunity. A healthy San Francisco cannot discriminate!
I urge you to NOT support CPMC's Master Plan plan unless 1) CPMC agreesto rebuild St. Luke's Hospital at an appropriate size to meet community needsand to provide equal standard of care for all patients, and 2) CPMC signs abinding agreement with the community to treat local residents and businesses,patients, nurses, and hospital staff with the respect we all deserve.
1155 Market St., 11th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94103 • Tel. (415) 554~3155 • Fax (415) 554~3161 • TTY (415) 554.3488
VATER
SAN FRANCISCO PU BLIC
O{lq<J" y. I epa.A C->BtFCij;,]t n:. ~r
,VVl4-/fZ- IUTILITIES COMMISSION
GAVIN NEWSOMMAYOR
F.X. CROWLEYPRESIDENT
FRANCESCA VIETORVICE PRESIDENT
ANN MOLLER CAENCOMMiSSIONER
JULIET ELLISCOMMISSIONER
ANSON B. MORANCOMMISSIONER
ED HARRINGTON(',;ENERAl MANAGER
October 4,2010
Angela CalvilloClerk of the Board of SupervisorsI Drive Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceCity Hall, Room 244San Francisco, CA 94102
Subject: Project CUH947 Sustainable Energy Account Release, $1,873,500
Dear Ms. Calvillo,
[ would like to request your assistance to have calendared a release of reserve on theSFPUC Sustainable Energy Account Project CUH947.
As part of the FY 2007 - 08 Hetch Hetchy Capital Project Budget, $3,173,500 wasplaced on reserve pending the SFPUC status report on the Community ChoiceAggregation Implementation Plan.
On July 8, 2009, at the request of the Public Utilities Commission, the Budget FinanceCommittee released $1,300,000 of the reserved funds. I would like to request theremaining of $1 ,873,500 needed to support costs associated with the implementation ofCCA by early 20 II.
(/ V\".. )
& ..... -11
G p,,-rt'~!1' -p,&
-~ !'If'rY\v£1?-S !J?(o(.;:!: I 1- AM../\ - ~JA&~.,tT ,u-t,J)ON):>.i 05 tiNt> p,
'SlV\),,-~ I\"T 0i'!J (.0(.<.&'1<>' 1OY/- MW-.9 .l)0'\<V1-S -!-- tI/"rlIU tVVi)V'.>/.:>!ttbo0'1 11=V
&!Il-OWt,.>lry ef"~<H'1.lL Or CHtU)ffDoD OIfu,'7Z~ 1-;0 P!14W11.fot JTtv\) H~vJ
~i>0N;a,-Lt>S ~\) o1lleYt- "fr-rf:>-j;ft;,oO LHlo/l1V$ CoNTJl-tl?vlV "0 ~, A-l rf1.viJ/r,l-(
t Do fIJ 0'/ f{IWu CHUf)I'W1V Mil t:- {;JonL i0l fl-UI) ot0i'l-(J::>.> 1'. Wl-(L
/J1i'{(iYL.. 0uj ~ tF~LDjWIJ tkff'.0 fW>1.N-s~:f' 7, (J11J ~.f f{r:rcpCfIJ t 1- r-<;lY'L
rKf-YT {Ii\1-WN1? 'bMuLl;) ~ 11-{e ~l.W J/l0 w\-t~~Wi7 rv
')kit=: Vii- ~t()S, IJ:JV"l 4''FG0C ~TI'rl'-t0 C:;;WrN1fli'l-D5 "::>l{.u-vL\) "l?4" 1N\rqDel
AP \) e-N~1) ~ ~,->'11- 1HJr COf<f0rln-no.u DV--"T/{..; bt,Ol/tr 7;
Tf--to O>It~{)V\AltlL0N t? (/10 ~\.r.i-llttJ lJ 10 WIPr\LJ ~~ (j s tbYL.j[;[,s
/:L0 [4'L TYt o?- C-!tlI...f)/l.d'IJ 1lv -~ Gfj- ,
tell ;rr /2;,fj Itt-p-JOu.Jf'J ;VliM ;vcT l"r 'fntJ o'f- i~Dewvl+lD5 0 Ii- iT~ f:9oD
fj{BUl.cM 3' L»CJnlL 1fd~'1!S. 0vT 3- /flhO 'Do ,t0T!T i0EL 1H.6 f?tfrfJ/hd
10 fL-.- (jf:~{ j) Of%ec, t y ~07 f DU5t:J v 10 yt1 v DOiU Y-1-G\» / 6VI ItsWrJ lL rr-;
1f1./ 7L--fLooL7f\1ND TH-d ~L5 fI'2-oVli)li'~ TC? ("/-Id...'0r1-<:d7J( ~--(}J
(Vvovtu 4D orJ \lit.? ':::>LUV'- \:?uOl101t;:; frJo vWc!P TO 1{~ 5cHocL:;,
:t- ~y\U'15' lP TWx (11,0 ftl-OfO <3>ei) L~!?THI"tT rrnU1-p;, ~ VI:;;l7Lrf~
t)ft'tJVlD 'l276 5fi)/2.-v'u<) f4io~tt w;r-'71l 1'0).5,~ cJ1 Jrucr3
...-rA .. '\ \. t1 D u -r (L- 1.1D U{1--- T~ p-A) I)
!jf\Ml\) ~d 'Off;tJ7fJfYL, (, m-l1'J 'L.. u fO (/
fqcT1[,I-,vteAJ ,
( .
/ f 1,
Vl\V\.O~ CS IC\ E/Vloc..\"o VI ole ttY":::, l'\ l~O '\
rOt""'. J<~Olr Ot t),,\ Mc.JtJl'lo.ld's I
--+- 0<-""1.. .b t <-<--\.. -I- tt: V\... L tv\. v c.... t/u ,,- .5 10 "'- t r- : c-o( "'- of~ S
'f0l1'<:\. s'll b+V+-" lOy- {II<. ~ f "I. f f:I. ~ f\': \"'-..3 (J. \ Q ~
SoJOt-S por ~0\OS~ y /1\0 Ja.r\e9
-t "'-"'- 5. ~ ~ ('it> 7Cl r ct i tI t. flIf'. tt?' ,1'1 Pt "f
" .
/VI v chtt -5 CtA (I:l r \ Ot -.S,
'10 C?~\lO 7u(!. n0 pC)(" Gf-ue..:
e5 ~ ~Pot"\o.Y\t<::. t'O-T"o. \10e..'O\-~o S c...\',c:z...'M-te.- G{-ve.-
,Tam:n\e..Vi ~ 0 (\ Los (\', (\0 3 I 0\. l)<:..Y\\r 0.. Qc:> y"y\ \,,\'()..'t"
0.\ n'\c..d.<!>0.o.\6.'S I y ~<5b('C.c +060 -\-ayY\b~eYl e...:s~
\-
UnQ o~s+\OQC:;OI'\ YCCl\O ~o::s \'l\()c>5 r
+C"(Vlb',<::", l('le<'\'5o Cfve Oe.-V1~'(" (!:l.J c..ortt\,ta..r- al
~ ~onO-.\o\S flO -:::'olo~ lo::s n\'i1D'S \) \~>{\eVI X
e\-::S-d21Ue-tc C2)'-,. no to.VV\'o~,<z-", \0-5 ~e.Y\~c.s
I'Y'lDyo,es/~
-'-OxYl»'IrVl -:::-;:, 0, /YI~Ort<:o..'ftte'S C:[-U<z- to;s ~v<::)ve..-\-e",s
~'l'\.~\,,\I,}e.,", ~o~ qve.. '(V)uc..~q~e.x\-\-e.. h.o'S ~L~~c'
"<\o..'(\'lO5 ,
\k~~ ~~ o~ 8J?£:-~\JiSoRc;,.I
W~\~~ 1-- ~~~~ \S, \\N{~ I-K
o~y -to~ \r\\A\)~~~vY Mert(~
\2:,emU;e )(w:y. WA.\Jc- ~~y ~\,wfc.e(;
m cYW:>b~G ~'MR ~\o\L txCl~tt:1
\f\S~ - O~ w\es \\AL ~\At~ ~\J
\NJv;\Je V\.~~\e. ~~~Cl( ~ LAV\ ~ V\ <; tEU6o~ ~ \\J\Q- ~~t \~ ~()u \b ~C1Ve
~Z\e- ~G\~Q \ ()~Ylt6~ S,u t~ lD\f'
iA\\~~\.O ~\~(\J\\<-- \\s o'f\clY\0 YVl\fe -\1\~rY ~~ tb, ~ec:ezu~c
\\S> ~c ~0-AeV\~S ~\M:) 'Le
\0 0 \N)O::;~ :\0 E~\- 0 c NJ-\:-
\0 t:~-\ ~ \JOV\vl(6S,
1.--0'0 ~~\3~ \'<\eo,\~ '<:::0" 0'C\<::;~ ~"<C\";(2.~\eC\eC\ ,'Y)~~ '<l'fa::::A-jf- ?e'<'o -\€~\\ o~c,~
CC""'O \~ C\~",\e \::::>\~~« B"\ \~o..y de \.0:::, ~C\~:::,
C \b~ CS~O~ e, .~ de.. \a.. """'c>¢.o.. *l\ \e::r::, 'CY-,o..~ ''''''?<::;< \.o.V\\e.
l-e.. 'd~~ f.- ~ __~ ~
Cl+3 H~\ t\J,-"-Vvt\:),, \\~ 60CJ Ii 50c\E:-\a C>-i\~ c~~"'5\"'8~-\c;'C"f\8
f\tJne'C ~<:..\c.£s \0wc>-'65>\-Vle.. ~\A\)\'\C '\~ \!c>~
G.VI(j ~''d ~o A \X o:::f\ Q\~eG-"C>--DCE: cR A'Me,'\ c~)JG~r'
w~\\ 1\ he\~ta\~y G-.\i\?j \CO·~( u\ eCG(\<S\M~C C\\s\sc
Wht) WG...s~ e one \MCl,e ~\~ \\OvS 0\\ G-- ~,O~C\\
fV\Q\ on((j ~~s \he 00\0'('\ -\0 d0.-nUS e~ A\\ 5p:'n\
i; ti\e. Lo,-,--\6 \'Je y"O ~uc\e6- \1\\0 ?o-,er\\kh\~ hCCA\ \'h
c\G.-t)5cSAeM~~\e.5 C;\: CA\f\~ o\\e~ c"\C:~ '\,:,C: WQ(} ccrCYL.\
~~r:;;;;~ ~~ <t30 ~a0 \\:6 Jj5CLf:.- o
Cq \
. \"i \2:e '(\ .. /
ne~~ ~OO--"6- 05\ ~,-~e~:>j\ SO\ "j/
W\\C~\-- c-\l~\08e..~ YJf::oU,s: ~\~6~ \~t> en-\er;;:\(\.tr. \~eDD-5\\\.c-S5 JZ. s:c:-ct\? '.k S'Z'(J 'oD0 ~\\ esS w~\\t e\J e\2j
+-\'\O\.A~~-'\.- \'" t'l~ \'\.EC~ tYt\"'-~\'\\~ '-6°,,-" \\'O\0~ "cO -\ac'KE:
o\je'~1~ O\\\t) ~~e~~n~~\~~ ~~ J~ \\\:\~ \c~~\- . '~e C\V)..\0,o~ jJ\,c\eb \) 5 e\~<A.\-"5 ,,\\lou..' ~e\5\~<?\\100(b\oc\c,,~. !\Q~~ Yj?~ CO\\\~c\e~, O--~ -\~-i"~\.c~G<:->0\l) Yl e,s \(\ ,~\t€- c\(j ~\oO!A\ t~e \" \'\\ \\.A '>
\~() w Y."oC)u\- 1"""~ he0.~ ~eo?le\"l~ ns ~\\ \~e \"1o/1e.6:~ cs\ \h~ ~"J: \\5 0\\ 0- ~\0b~ DCA~~S~ d\\a:\le- ca0CA. 0.5\\€ ~ '~~e 1"\ \\t e\ \' \l'\?~\ 6<;;: \\ ~Ql",,~y\:o \05CA\ G30v\<l 'ae \\ (\~ \ (\ \e~\'I. S d\ 4-Jt e ~l ~sleep cJ \\~?jh-\-?
)-\00 c.o~~ tJC3~ 'oe-\'\\\\e- ~Vte ,0(:'\ LO"',,<0"~\\O\\O-Y\~ dkVV]~1k \\C74Uj on~o fhe- n~~eo~\e 0\-t\A \S c \\~ j wh[k "00'A.. '5;A btZC~ ~\I\ l QC~ l[/ )< E:-
?Ok :~V~()~ \()o\hfe. ~Gf\e SOi!Vje-\:h~n~ <-\C()~:\(\ -th I 7 c [+,(r• \;1<2-\\ '6~c;: ex.:\.S ,cJ;; ~'-"-~\)\ !\2)601.01\ so2\e\o-0-'\\6 \\"\\~()\c., lASe:- cJ.\ MOYle, A\ ~ " \ \~ \ g.\S /\JO \ 9f\'{\~ ID \Me.l.~e Q..~~ (CA5\(:)V'1e ~ ~Cl:f?~/"
-fo\' ·~o t\~ CA..S ~\AC-\:j- ,\\oce.- Q'(\ o'Z~eC \9<:;:: c.
__ ~\d}'c/;j;I;'i'lh\'c\ \<~S"'''''\\,,~6 cA~\
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~\ NCI:4fF Ly,
S~S'\CA-
kfW- \V\/\i OIL Nt \'<<;(JN\ V- 'B'li\'i'-D Of S \J fr12 Y\So \"SI
\ '\\1IN'f- tTS O~f'i Tt\? ll\;fVl:; n'lI'T \lYb rtll IN Ow
1M''!'i Mft; t>; - l3u 1 I1\ ISO 1\1\ Me 1 MM "" b ,ttovvo
o\\J f M WE OY'TI a1":; [", Ou1'- H/'I l'Y'i MfA~s 1--1 ~ b iO
b UjeT
1'> ~1'i1"'\? Gr fILl"', 1- \I< GINO A l-'I't;cf\D-j hfW t THr C h aI( t Of
''I' VI- l' iii \Y'fl?\":; \ IVSIT1"'<7 I) F~ fI£ \t r, :; G 11-11'\1 \"fan r
.)\,~ Hf\\lf~ MOleE rl f/1\\.;n~I';I( Gr't\()f'J~, ]x As
::"Cl\Z 1I-1t~~'fY'1 NI'tT'\~ TO"! ( I TI-i l\'Jb \1 S OILA'} N 'dft t. ( MOst
i'\ PS CGM " fUl" 1\\ t lG~S 1,. (p (-'1 \'"Wi \b(:-C}'V"I;- eli",!
p OJ"\ tll f GN E TI'-\ r-t \tv f\ 0'1 LV'.
POJYZJ- S U pe!11 L..s (J YS
~ 0Pi'o'YL e3 Je- 91cJ C)v/TOY lM-ppy JIA.eo{
fed 1{)P- /0-:;' p-ey~&~ c{u.e.. cofLPJC1.Jt1. C.D!4,dct PceJ/a.
SU-s l<-(jos tiyJ#t-pt d-J1/cM P "s~,,1 JIl-,'';[t?S tle ses,'trJosPG>i rue-. (cJ-.5 pd~6 /!J:/..!) cjv£- rJ-YiJO-~YL c:tlo-- fLJIldcL~1cll11$85 JUslo c;~ LiJ- C(lJi"Te7'1,
~~ 45 ~ \~ ~ ~j;..w ~ 3~ 1f;;vu~+rrw ~ ~ !A~ Jw 0--)J.4Y11 r ~l!~ d-- ~'
~J' :5ft/~ <dfl'\~~ ~ ~~ dJ- /oJ'{" ~'
(J ~ if<>it. ;J;;;iw ~~utfPj M6q lr ,
WfJ~y~J~~PP(J M6Q/·
f~ los ~(eRr-'" q uG '3 60- " f 6
iJ'2 '
lZ· p,~~~---------~------------------
DecA, ~00'r0\ of=" SOt>e..,vt&O,). ' .'CAm ex &.\'()Cj\~ tn\:\Y\ WDme.'f) \Y'\ SCtY') '~fC'h(\~( r",
, ..\ have (\0 \::tc\S. but \ WOoS. (1 klC\ once, 1 , hlghl~ believe.~ ch()\( e.- ~ ?Cl'(" e Y"'~ deG\C\\n~ WhCl.~ +-h..!Lr-e.-Drw:.'\Yff\ -eCA+-' V)'ne Y"\ \ \.NOS 0 Chid Iffi\j prue()+,:>\A..)ovld k"-'1-€:a-\ v'S orx:.e.. tr-. CA tAJhl"\.e. OUf" h4p\=>y tyleM '5
Dr~'( \-C\,\\k CAt'\C\ etpp\e CXI~~\-S ,The. pucQ.ll+s ~\rY()U\U
r ec\\\"2-'e Dn '\1\J2.,rQ- ~Yn Wh~ hbt- Cjt:t:X A DC he<..tHh\j royo\h.Q.r~ vh\4cAre.n. OhO\ce., \~ up "\-<.> ~ pewe.bve +~wt-~rt- *"~ ~Ol'\€ VJrt0+-.~ Tv-lPPY ~,ecLl hl(.4J..£ ~\<:\-ctS hCA~ ." . !L
'slne:e-,r'j)
Kews.s..CA
1__-
~QY-o ~ DI;f':~ V\O ~UI~~eVC1... ~\ L~S'
:+U('\QIALoS ~\;."'S \coS Co~ t' rCv~?C1\r L os. .:J '.') -3.v~~ s
i6 BeY 01'\ ~~ d!L f?e«J~ {ttL C(Ue- {~Stc£-R--~ {a- UJJvl dJL ~<M ~(tc13CO i ~l~30 rJ'0
~aJ7'f Me415 ~ ~9f;1l<Uets {VD a fAUo ~~ letSl1u~ cV- fYlr ~J (l I :51eYl1P1~ 'f wrF('uk lo ~:Ja(}t'hl- 0 b5 . '(eas ttl me!) ~ J.Lo'y i ~<JufA:> {ptytfJ/U/~u(\ ~py ~ rUt- UM+uv:Jcl.- ~;2--gy')~$ y (eLk<V'l t~$ay ~ ~~d-5 Y b(5Jo· ~h ~I MU-{wJ- ~ rYl~ Yu'Ja ~u(1) tC> fY1/ ~'-~ (\;0 'f (11:'Y~~'D\'lS(t,b;lt~dJ &n r~ fvu»~\~ ~ ~ueA'D J;;vv~d CW-o~ ck .. eJ,trYlUf);fe.s ;J, n1r (;ufcz. yD ~'eAr0oyUr& ~ ~SL@f/ ic CkiC). ~~ efL (atrnt' u&,'[)/ fviQ/'(~ ~Yle- ~9i1 (V/.J/;tl £2 Sus !v..j&S
~~~ .Bect\'6- 6~ Sv<ref"VlSOrS
r &e..\ I;k-<- /{Q)1ot'\cdd.$ Ao/py~Cl\~ ct,\fC tAO+ JqJ ~V' 6uV--- ~h, r1d~/I\
I
,~ /;l\Db-~rC\+~t\.· :1.. b-f.Jl'Ve. 1+ SkotA fdh~ tA\y ·6e-.S(~'~" -fo bAy !WPPy tA~t!«(S
~C> c~il'\c "1-' (\1) <:\"t:.be" e.\<:. s""c.o.r \.o'S. I;\~?y "-c.~ ~ '1\ es l.lY'G ~':n
?= \0 S (\\"Os. Cl-\.a",d.o \=. (j'",~rc.s \os~c....1'\ ,?C\.-c. <::."''"'' c.i' '\ \J:>::. \,<,,6.rt.~
ck~Er<\oS cI..... o.e.d.. e'So ~o. '1-' S<>... '"""\o.WI~"O \C::;. pl'e:.<.k'" S ",c>S COm.,J.O:l> Y,,'fpe-.. i!,\.. l:> ~"''{'''' t-... e;;\'('o'S. ('J:i\o s •
A..... 0- T~.J. ~ 0, ~w V'-~ <9 \~ 6'''''1 ~'\-\ T ~"" ~'\'~roAiAV\Cl2- 01 ~ ~&'c'.'~Q~ 'T ~ 0100--+ { 6.t:.1'<;'
0et,\J(':j k\'>{~, T \w\.ow v.J~\: '"'/OV O'<rb. ..(..,..1(('0 -ti tk 'fq. \r-e~~~ cvlo M611l' l,.. +o..~ v<:Y1 5°&.\ .lc....rt-Ro"'-.... GOA ~-te<~ r ~~<D~~ ~ \,'?,\.... (),~;Io~ II\N-~ .wo~. .l. ~lA, ck",t.- ~~ .(k~
{.9d:A'v-j ""'(!; -k ~~ .ke.1'<;.q O"'-.J;. ~<' I cl.o.vd~-br 'f'r.. ~ A'2ltJWO\I' rt. f ... "'At:)r¢- ~.., (!"OVj~ vv~ ~ f"f9n"-..(),~,,,'r"f'ovi?~~ -k> ~ olco,,",- co.'vovRe,,,, I t>,-\- l<v0 \ o~<' ?+a,,,,",, Dr
f"'SCfM<!OvJr w"'Rck ?<l. U"'~,,\~, T o..), 0"'.1 r ~ ~
,-~k\- ~{) ~"-(C ~ ~<:A"c9,o", Jf rr- ~ "('" "] l"S~ ~~ tor
~..- .k '\1 \!.-'~.\\... ft. 1: "",C;l\ vJ- J"ol ft?-~l ~~ ~~~a.,,+- ~oo1 0'''<:"" '(~ '~L.a.~ LVO"l6- lc (W.'b0e>.... tor~ I t\~r lA\A,
-.::i:"' ov-- h.c,/ ~ """.L c;.~ L".8111. vJ. 1-\- &""c", f", ().. oJ.A.jjl€ o..-f,b....-~4 o--u, ~ ~fe-,.. ~.l<Jo~,,+&~~ q,lt-.~ ~s 4-0 ev...t-oV'-6 ~V\ DA.l olA.1 ~V\ <;,~ ~."" ecJ- ~\.~ ~o~ I1:\.,J 'fll\J.~ ~~I'
f~~q ,.,S;X;~~:9i11yEi Co-wI) ')IlI1adrc.. de. ~afM; fl'C\...
Me Se..cS 1'/D c.kS,' ell' Y' S c> bre. /0 C;u. <.
C&J,vte 1\ 'yY1; S . kilos ).CD ~lt0-~'\f CJ
lAo. ff Y me. cd Solos los {'1'Me S c/;e-
~V\..~ Pcty 0- ),Nt~ -3 W vt~D5·
5'm a.... Co- ~~4 vt '(':) U\
(II; t80;fJnI oj {Hj1II"f/fS/Jr I
I W'i"d~iY,,-I.f<A d ft.af !-/cff~ Ife,p./ ~ ;1c~q
jMd4- ~ ~ ,i.../; to 1 ~ ,-<~ ~ 0"'""'7da.. t>i1' k;;t. i r- ~d ~t/"7 «Jab F ~ n.-<.. / )-I'~ ~ ~~ r ~ ~ ~p~(
DOd'i d C)j S\)~e1 \flS(),C,
Dcbe"1I!l'l ('~\J((\\ ~\ lme~1) S\ Lo ~0dle:, de (J)'!>L() deb6'0 "llYn12I\{cn
d Su') nl-IOS. ~ue -tl~ 0 J€' unfit ~d este.Yl (0 Y\ ~O\'l\(e-I\ ~\)) diYl
~e, ~'(c\j1\(d\) de 1i1" ~\\:)te\il~») '¥tlJ'h\~nt~s que *l~}'\E'~ ~~ l~lYll\.~0_
In <'f(Y't'\:\''1;}l'( cl. l\(jcei Q~~l)t\ ~\I:'\ U:Cl<J
't'( ~l ~",,,C\.'Ue. 2- QUf('Ol1d\ )<.Js l(jb\l(';)
Je.')~ue) de (..()mey 1 {ilL \in(Q'n";,0 ml d~s,
et\J\' lo<:> f",-,h e'J ~)e~ en\ qIJ\' l()nS()m~'i\ y~C>~Cln ~ SoS Itl\IbS \j(l~ ll::l~l~c- )Cl\.ud~b\e,
14)", 116 ~'Qfln~;j lc,
swe.d tee. (')'\
Dd' 0Vll\l 'Ilt', e:n.
)l~f.e, ~ ~ ~cn ~ ()
(0'0'.. E' -
Lo ~7 \m'(l(:,I.-t2-'I\~\'
S(\D{e'0.~t> f.~\) ellos ~Q
Jcn.cla ,h\Jt~ S
\lY\ swuJ tE'2\
T ty\\Y\Vt- -wt:A\: ,--\0'--\ 'b\f'()U~Q(\r- .
-\Q'KQ we t-\C\?~ \~~\s c\'~J
1?Qeau~~ dS a \XAf.Q~~ \ \V\ \(\K
V(§? "'b\"G"-\\6 CDy\hr-o\ V-JVut C\f\?\L.\~~ ~-\ fr ~\~ \ ~f\"\- C\
~\ \OR \~"-\ ~~U-~Y\\QR ~\T\'l
a to'-\ 't::B::Dl.~e \ ~row 'S\rw
O~QVQS 'It \ \!\f)Y\T- to 'G2 o\o\e
'\0 ~~. ~ f'rC-.m\O.\c:\CSb
fu\j \reQ Q \rn??~ ~\,
~01:1 C«'J~ A ~CU~<\,I~
l~
l~G e,." \ "'- "- v--G~~'"
"Dt<s<..o.-,,,,i '3)"
je5~ S ~LoJ~\.
~
c(>.o'" Y'(I ,,<;cl p..
p .. c ,s,J [ y '"
5, ~ \ t~c:,
C2 -11. &0 1 0
61 Co. ~1£ ofJ~ M't MAl D~~ aau:a oV ["J., !Jqj!;l'l;Mi!cdc>
o A 1. _I ;,~ .;JI-. -/0, a lft> f~ ':'A--. ) /lIlA.t. /J~ 0~ .R<IA.kVl-C't
{t /v!l /,,'C VVU-L'U--;l t;J1AI\M.( ~v""J f' I
{1M~t;cvaw::l'l pw Oc Lib ~ i '1Oj C[ M1 fOl· 1m rO,!~r d~ CUfCl/VLaA-1
.I)-WJ .~cLo.
·ra~t.~ ~u oU Ccu:, c1JMAloCooIec qvtA--f ~Ov( k",::> ;~
fRp ~) 0 biM:C!.M4.u..;~ M .10 -r:ix:,{£o Le::> d~ I fu. aAi k 04).-.AJC{
M fOd~'~ ~WD [0~,
:s O]S(2e LA-s Vt:mIlS 0c-- LA (!j)H/~ ?t1i2A tVu00s
o +-Ift?pf Me-ITt-s l f1-~; ?1I72-t~ ES Vf:>c./o~ lYE
f-.-;t '0 II ? cKSOf\) fI 0 ?A-V i2.E=s {ye UV'1 i p L A-
~ H 11;9 ? fJ-1Z It S v.s N I tJ as
1ft G rIE f1ItY
f{ E:STfttJ ~(t-tJT
i. e;(!.,H f?S.
07> eA ON r:::S I yIt 19 ()£ t= L
O;-2eC-G ;f(J(jO.5/ LOS /1-?Pt-E 7;:;-I1'P6)'
ffTTe-.
S ; ....l~7_ (-11 e-fJs:.n?L-o
o~peN~SO'\ ..
EYo'f ~~~ 1. 2 n'::ms ~ Q e\\e-s \E-SC2.I1C6n'b. corre' \\c .lbro\~IS.j 01\0 deccrde.c:\ve COfll\e" I +c:nemo5 opc'fones. ~.
~ve. Co (Y'O,n Sq\uebbIe"}\ e\\os \es 3 05\0(\ los J LJ~ue-.\e$ ~
V\O c~eo ~ue SeDY\ \os)~pr/ \-'YL€a \s .~ve ~ce ~<>e <:>\\os SeQYi S<Jr'J;~ 311/0.
\c6 dec~[~one3 ::+c...J~ un.C) +e>mq COmc>
pC\~'\e.
to Vie j 6 fM-tf ~F.x-:
dO~ ~~~ ~-0~ ck
~~ rr J.-e-~ .&.. ~fd~ r£e k/)11UvvtcLcb. ~ ~ ~WU2-:> ~
1tu:fM.-~ ~ hem I&~~ (~)
~~) 1j twt &. (fttMo& ~ ~~
ry~ CYf;~ .{~~ ~ ) -re ~'-J-~
~~ ) --?1-0' ~cr~ .a~ [email protected] ~-t; ~ tm ~uco
k ~'fe d ~H C-j e4 0 ~ ee/cJ>z <Z
Mah I ~-r; ~ .d;vrte ~ ~~rA.> r~~ ~.
~ PooJJ! ~ /IAAc'-.K./l.fJ.-1-<)(IYbL}
J b(1-~~~d~~f-J whJ w-' 0J mJh~. f11~~
77~ ~ 0-~~ vJ- p~-fo+~,~ '.'~ ~~t c eY ~~S 'tNl~~J\S
~f1j ~. ~ p ~ -fv0~ ~~ Dh~ OL~ rL0 (L-f-~
Jk-~ liJdp~~~~~cJMSz-- ~ rert~~~ .
~.~(
~~~;L~
~ 0 (A. i do F SUfi?Y b:SxJv'u,,-3 Yla f?:J !cJ.Yec:?:oy\ <1.<2- '/02 los )/},' /?;oS
10" cia.:; S :\1\6 10 Cc>y>\" n 0. do: <;"'1 ~ €J +e Y'- 8<'0
'30 b, ~'Yl(J ?,UQ no '!. $10... 2!to-t de) '')~cayY1e.
{l0 yu( evo $iveSe 1'u:/.'2,,", rueS VVlo.
h ~)nG.S'. C Cl yY>QY HctPj?I Y>1 e cd de.- VeS
/'>JYI'~C' 1<0 Jv,~ue:z 1'1D1'" Ie S'J5 5"'1 \oS", \ 'Ie- s-l-
5'"-'" F ""'" C :5 C (l C';:' Y-( ~"'1
5~ rycY\,&;z cd'",
vy,
+-\ (). Cf( y ''Y\ e 0, \
vb?Y~e- (p"".,..o.. (o.J
~." CUC\A do
'Bot/rei tfr ~\I!&e('I
,t4I °Frf'Of1 6n \'1Kiny <1\1.4';\ -\he mPf":j xneal, I
t:Y -rhCit J clMt tvJivtc:-1-:t re411'j cltvt.
1'f'- ~ keep \t l -then Wjj ~Plt. U -th>B3 I
+ce\<c:~t C\\Jlt);(j.! +heY) i1~ -tC1~<t C1~. I
~~·t'n\h5 ,~s .~Jqtme . IJeYYlYl1el0t dMs. nDt
1rM!'. q, f\9ht 1t> 'tel\., f'1rent ~wr, I
QJ'I\\c1 caht ect\;: '\hllt its \An htxli1:1:} .)1'::'~
f\yc-VYts choiceio·-Fec! "th'&"!f C~'1ild ~cDJYJqas I
or J1ti;.I
i~- ~{jfJ> II
II
I
I
I
II
I
I
I
II
· '/'-J\Q''j 0 III <2-\''.) So \'\(\ Cj'e. () cr lU. po r,q \qtl eMok cle Me dO/(lQI s «;5 l yV1 POd-ZH1 ie CJ. Ue..
~jCVlI1/\(X;' l05 \ l-u1 f PYmel c) fO Ott (0) )'l iha'S )
-""
~ \?Jt,\\~\J~ c~~ ~cK'Q:~\- S:'0CJ\\l6 nCAV\?J .~ \\~Y\-\-
'm (lI)'{\\-'(o \ ~l"Q..-\- \;Y\~\r C\\\0 eo.\;( I '{'(\C/ QUro\Do Y'O\?O~
'('(\Q(}\<; 01;(; 0 ¥(<<}k -\() ().. cntd '\ 1tO+ 1(f\CJ.~-6&-m~ \L6.fl9.'l'iY\~\[\::S: ~Q& C\ ~\OX'0'j 600. IJ\PV"lO \?(\Vlf) ~ -to \Yl(;
D()'ro\~ .mr C\. ·~~fOf geed D€>\('OV\OQ.- O'f ~ood'O~·
:J.~ '{1\()\\V~ \YlE:J .\-0 'I'<'J 'fIoxe\Q~ . 'BDT S- \r<CU\6 '(\4:-- <31\()\()(D {).\\ -\'0eJ \\{\\~ \ ~-t C\\1:'X1eI OY\C.:;el a xYlork-\n '\l\0£.'t-\\R- ~-\'\m"V C}l\\\O\'tX\ Clf\-~~ '<Yii$lS. ut- no'(rcU
b,(, &CJ~\ \ 6\[\ \\,) \cYo o~.t\r>-V-t\('\~-tn4 eQt-~~\.~. 50 \<:, "(\'!iG'QO\[lr1\d.i:,~I)~ \~·r~t(\- Ifr'(\~ Q'rJQS(\-~
YOS CCP,(\0~f \ ~-e.J y.oV-e, o.\.\r:>o;jJ \(\Q\{-e; ~ w@\jWrecLlS ) go :\- ~\\~'1-€J\\IZJ ~\'I 6~-t~ '\f'O.S, «)o~r;€.)
\ll? \G 'OtcOlE-er "'0r'~ ~ O-"'V Q~ '0CJV\I'V ClY'O\~\()N.J:) \ )
~\)\"" 'f\U OC>'00\6s: '\\'If)( -Q,.E1J'( ~Be\\\Qi~ ."\'1&1- 'w-~.~ SX'Ov\Q V\ot~ .\b\:RX\ QI{'IO.'j'
Infonnation Request Fonnboard.of.supervisorsto:board.of.supervisors10/111201007:29 AMShow Details
/ . Page 1 of1
~l:rr
To:[email protected]:[email protected] NAME:JimLAST NAME:TonerADDRESSj -CITY:~ •STATE:TexasZIP:75040PHONE NUMBER:214-535-4748FAX:noCONTACT_EMAIL:[email protected]_OF_RECORD:Last weekF1LENUMBER:RESOLUTIONNUMBER:ORDINANCENUMBER:MOTIONNUMBER:SEE]ILE_ON:PICK_UP_INFORMATION ON:happy mealsMAIL INFORMATION:YesADDITIONAL_INFORMATION_DETAIL:Why don't you go back to work on your budget problems,and leave raising kids to their parents? You are intruding in an area outside your expertise, and trying tocontrol private life. You ought to be able to see that. The rest of fue country fuinks you are wrong here. Iam 85 and would just drive my family to a place outside your control. Hope everyone would do fuesame.
( bc~)file://C:IDocuments and SettingslRCalonsaglLocal SettingsITemplnotesFFF692\-web086... 1O/12/20~'
Page 1 of 1
Chaffee -- Come to the Ethics Commission Today to Defend YourselfJames Chaffeeto:Bevan.Dufty, board.of.supervisors, Carmen,Chu, Chris.Daly, David Campos, David Chiu, Eric L. Mar,John.Avalos, Michela.Alioto-Pier, Ross.Mirkarimi, Sean,Elsbernd, Sophie.Maxwell10118/201011:33 AMShow Details
1£ not now, When? II not Sne Cauthen, Who?The Ethics Commission today at 6:30 p,m, in Room 408 of City Hall will take up the recommendation of its staff that thepresident of the Library Commission's conduct "tails belaw the standard ofdecency, good faith and right actionimpliedly required ofall public officiais." It fails to mentioned that the conduct is the accepted standard for the LibraryCommission, The Ethics Commission proposes to send this finding to the Mayor as the commissioner's appointingauthority, They have not mentioned that it would be unconscionable for the Mayor not to hold the Library Commissionand the individual commissioner accountable,On June 4, 2009, Sue Cauthen's right to make public comment at a Library Commission meeting, on the agenda item,"General Public Comment" was denied, A complaint was brought against the president ofthe Library Commission, Thepresident refused to offer any justification of this action before the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force,The Secretary of the Library Commission issued a statement that the president of the Library Commission "stood by heractions," Of course, the violation of the Sunshine Ordinance was so inexcusable that no excuse was possible and therefusal to attend Task Force meetings when the violation was under consideration only emphasized that the violationwas willful. The finding of a willful violation was referred by the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force to the EthicsCommission for enforcement.It is now one year and five months later and the Library Commission has confirmed its contempt for decency byunanimously re-electing the offending commissioner for another term as its president,When I was much younger there was such cynicism about complaints of police brutality that a complaint of policebrutality had to be accompanied by disciaimers that the victim was only a wealthy middle-aged married couple, within afew steps of home, and no history of provoking the police, If we have reached that level of cynicism about Sunshineviolations, then Sue Cauthen is the ideal victim,Sue Cauthen is not an activist or a critic, In fact, Sue Cauthen is the chair of the Library Citizens Advisory Committeeappointed by the Board of Supervisors and a member of the Sunshine Ordinance Task Force, Both are positionsappointed by the Board of Supervisors and therefore, presumably, a person whose personal dignity the Supervisorswould have an interest in protecting.The circumstances are that the subject that Sue Cauthen wished to address was the placement of a branch library onproperty that had been designated for use as open space in North Beach, This is the first, and probably the last, timethat Sue Cauthen has ever questioned a library management decision, The fact that they used this agenda item toprevent Sue Cauthen from speaking is glaring,More importantly, Ms. Cauthen has admitted that it is very traumatic to be a blatant victim of the denial of publiccomment. Have you admitted to being so traumatized? I don't wish to put words in Sue Cauthen's mouth but thecontext is not hard to imagine, Sue Cauthen thinks that her opinion is based on her investigation of the facts and herability to reason, She thinks that if she discovers new facts and comes to a different conclusion, she still has a right toher opinion, She thinks that she has a right to an opinion and a right to express that opinion, Isn't that what you think?Isn't that what we all think? It is quite shocking to learn that in front of the Library Commission only certain opinionsconsistent their interests are tolerated. isn't this the danger of privatization and the deference to philanthropy inpublicly supported institutions,An attack on Ms. Cauthen's right to speak is not emblematic of the right to speak for all of us. An attack on one, is anattack on all. If not Sue Cauthen, Who? If not now, When?Please join us at the Ethics Commission meeting of today, October 18, 2010, at 6:30 p,m., City Hall, Room 408 to makesure that the commission acts on this complaint.James Chaffee
file:IIC:\Documents and Settings\pnevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesFFF692\~web0708,htm 10118/2010
Page I of2
Chaffee -- Library Commission Conduct Below the Standard of DecencyJames Chaffeeto:Bevan.Dufty, board.of.supervisors, Carmen.Chu, ChrisDaly, David Campos, David Chiu, Eric L. Mar,John.Avalos, Michela.Alioto-Pier, Ross.Mirkarimi, Sean.Elsbemd, Sophie.Maxwell10/171201001:26 AMCc:deetje, frandacosta, grossman356, h, home, kimo, Libraryusers2004, mail, marc, MPetrelis, "P Warfield",rak0408, "Ray Hartz", SCau1321, "Timothy Gillespie I", "'Timothy Gillespie 2"', "'Timothy Gillespie 3''',W_Lanier, bbegin, "'Bruce Brugmann''', "Katie Worth", "Marisa Lagos", matierandross, rgordon,sfmeskunas, tienShow Details
Dear Friends,
The Ethics Commission has placed a hearing on its October 18 agenda regarding Sue Cauthen v. thelibrary Commission, which was referred to the Ethics Commission on January 13, 2010 by the SunshineOrdinance Task Force for "willful failure" to comply with the Sunshine Ordinance. The memorandumthat was issued by the Ethics Commission staff to support the agenda item is dated October 14. Onewould think that there might be more than two work days and two weekend days for the public toabsorb the information in the memorandum and disseminate information about the hearing tointerested parties.
The underlying violation took place on June 4,2009. The Sunshine Task Force made its initial order ofdetermination ofthe willful violation on July 28, 2009. The library refused to make any sort of responseor offer any correction of its action. That led to the referral to the Ethics Commission on January 13,2010. The violation involves actions by Jewell Gomez, the president of the San Francisco libraryCommission, in actively preventing public comment when it was clear that there was no justification andthe prevention of legitimate comment was especially belligerent and disrespectful.
It must be understood that with both the Order of Determination and referral to the Ethics Commissionwere on the record and had been brought to the attention of the full library Commission by severalcitizens under general public comment. The library Commission never discussed the issue andendorsed the violation by re-electing Jewell Gomez for another term as its president on April 1, 2010,with a unanimous vote.
The memorandum of the Ethics Commission finds that library Commission President Jewell Gomez'conduct 'Jails below the standard of decency, good faith and right action impliedly required Of all publicofficials." The Ethics Commission also proposes to send a letter to the Mayor as Jewell Gomez'appointing authority for the Mayor to consider the implication of such a finding.
The Ethics Commission obViously considers this a compromise since it is recommending no penalty ordisciplinary action of any kind. Without any accountability or repercussions, a strong statement of thetruth is expected to be a sort of a consolation. The memorandum that deflects any discussion of
file://C:\Documents and Settings\pnevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesFFF692\-web7912.htm 10/18/2010(. 22)\1
Page 20f2
accountability is deeply flawed and there would be much to complain about if we wanted to complain.The trouble is, we don't wish to complain. Sometimes giving a name and acknowledgment to a wrongthat has been done and then letting that truth stand unassailed is more powerful than any pro forma ortoken penalty would have been. I think most people understand that this is the acknowledgment of along tradition of Library Commission conduct below the standard of decency and good faith born of itscontempt for the public.
The memorandum ofthe Ethics Commission is attached.
Please join us at the Ethics Commission meeting, October 18, 6:30 p.m., City Hall, Room 408. The SueCauthen Complaint is the first item after general public comment.
James Chaffee
file:IIC:\Documents and Settings\pnevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesFFF692\-web7912.htm 10118/2010
18/18/2818 11:38 4158852225 BILL QUAN PAGE 82/82
October 18,2010
San Francisco Board ofSupervisorsCity and County of San FranciscoI Dr. Carlton Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA. 94102
nUl )D/ 0 ~G.!J.J3()s·-/r \' )
CPIC~
RE: Supervisor Avalos' Updating Enforcement and Compliance Procedures for Nuisance
Dear Sllpervisors:
I am wrHing to you because I have some concems about the subject proposed legislation.heard at the Public Safety Committee on October 18th. The Legislative Digest states thatthere have been complaints about the way property owners have handled and disposed ofgarbage, but the subjectproposed legislation will not only apply to garbage, but toeverything.
The proposed legislation also talks about how a single violation Can become a multipleviolation for each day the violation isn't corrected. Thus, by the fifth day, fines wuldreach$5,OOO for what is really a single problem. Instead oftrus, I think what's needed arefines for tenants who do not cooperate' in the treatment oftheir units. Recently, I had abed bug problem and it took several weeks, even with the intervention of DPH, for thetenant to cooperate with the recommendations ofthe Pest Control Operator (PCO). Thetenant had refused to wasl:t his cJothes, vacuUln his apartment, and get rid of clutter andinfested furniture between sprayings,.
Under the proposed legislation there will be additional paperwork; 1believe excessive.For example, testing and inSj>ection reports and written proof ma.y be required. Also, theproofmust be in a form acceptable to DPH, which I don't understand. I thotlght "proof isproof". In any case, I think it should be sufficient to submit copies of invoices fortreatment from the PCO. Also, annually DPH will required the property owner to submittheir contact information. OBI which issues more NOVs than DPH seems to have notrouble contacting property owners; that's seems true for other emergency responders,such as Police and the Fire Departments, which annually does a surprise inspection ofbuildings. Speaking of DBI. they can also issue NOVs for nuisance and some tenants willcall both DPH and OBI to complain; this leads me to this question: Why is it necessary tohave more than one department involved in enforcement nuisance codes?
Sincerely,
B~~'
SupervisorAvalosNuisanceLeg-0ct2010.wps
AmyL. BrownDirector ofReal Estate
City and County of San Fr~ncisco
REAL ESTATE DIVISION
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
October 12,2010
Angela CalvilloClerk of the Board
Amy 1. Brown ~;f?~~Director of Real Estate
SUBJECT: Japantown City Agency Work GroupStaff ContactReference No. 20101005-008
I am in receipt of your letter dated October 8, 2010, relative to Reference No. 20101005-008. Pleasebe advised that Amy Brown, Director of Real Estate, will be the contact on behalf of the Real EstateDivision to participate in the Japantown City Agency Work Group to assist in coordinating effortsbetween the City, consultants and the community on the Planning Department's Japantown BetterNeighborhoods Plan.
cc: Supervisor Mirkarimi
i:\managers\admin ab\bos ref 201 01 005w 008.doc
Office of the Director of Real Estate' 25 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 400 • San Francisco, CA 94102(415) 554-9850 • FAX: (415) 552-9216
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INQUIRYBoard of to:
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS INQUIRYFor any questions, call the sponsoring supervisor
10/08/2010 10:22 AM
TO:
FROM:DATE:
. REFERENCE:FILE NO.
Amy BrownReal Estate
Clerk of the Board10/8/201020101005-008
Due Date: 11/7/2010
This is an inquiry from a member of the Board of Supervisors made at the Boardmeeting on 101512010.
Supervisor Mirkarimi requests the following information:
Requesting the following City agencies identify staffcontacts for the purpose ofparticipating in a Japantown CityAgency Work Group to coordinate effortsbetween the City, consultants and the community on the Planning Department'sJapantown Better Neighborhoods Plan.
Please indicate the reference number shown above in your response, direct the originalvia email to [email protected] and send a copy to the Supervisor(s)noted above.
Your response to this inquiry is requested by 11/7/2010
Page 1 of33
RE: Cowboy Bob's Bum ReportBob Lariveto:'Bob Larive', Igoodin1, 'Craig Schwan', 'Aline Estournes', dania.duke, 'Jan Misch', 'Kevin Carroll', 'quin.orlick@tuscaninn. com', 'Steve', kevin.cashman, 'cwnevius', 'kgarcia'10/17/201001:01 PMCc:"'Lee Housekeeper"', Board.of.Supervisors, dsaunders, matierandross, 19archik, dhussey, gavin.newsom,northbeachchamber, info, David.Chiu, Bevan.Dufty, Carmen.Chu, Chris.Daly, David.Campos,Eric.L.Mar, John.Avalos, Michela.Alioto-Pier, Ross.Mirkarimi, Sean.Elsbernd, Sophie.MaxwellShow Details
God help us! When wil! the Stupidvisors learn?
!2ankn,ljlt San Fran Conceme(;tA.boutNail Salon Po!i§t!October 17, 2010, 02:01 PMThe State has had $140 billion in deficits in six years. Our unemployment is 12.6% and the governmentschools have a drop out rate of 40% statewide.
San Fran has a budget deficit north of $400 million--in a couple of years it will be $1,000,000,000.Unions close the BART system on a whim. The DA is providing money for illegal aliens to beatdeportation and the Mayor is sending illegal aliens drug dealers to San Bernardino to escape the Feds.
Yet the Board of Supervisors in SF have the time to concern themselves about nail polish.
"Board of Supervisors President David Chiu is using encouragement legislation to try and convince SanFranciscos 200 nail salons to discontinue use ofproducts containing three toxins.
Referred to as the toxic trio, toluene, dibutyl phthalate or formaldehyde found in nail productscan be harmful to pregnant women, and cause headaches, nausea and asthma."
Of course if woman have these problems they would not use the products or go to another salon.Another law is not needed.
Well, maybe one new law is needed. Before you can run for office you need to prove you havecommon sense.
Fior d' ItaliaAmerica's Oidest Italian Restaurant2237 Mason StreetSan Francisco CA 94133(415) 986-1886 www.fiQr,~Qm
From: Bob Larive [maiito:boQ.©lfIoI.com]Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2010 3:05 PMTo: '[email protected]'; 'Craig Schwan'; 'Aline Estournes'; '[email protected]'; 'Jan Misch'; 'KevinCarroll'; 'quin. orlick@tuscaninn. com'; 'Steve'; '[email protected]'; 'cwnevius'; 'kgarcia'ee: 'Lee Housekeeper'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';
file://C:\Documents and Settings\pnevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesFFF692\-web4295.htm 10/18/2010 ('2.. -<."
Page 2 of33
'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]';'[email protected]'; '[email protected]'; '[email protected]'Subject: Cowboy Bob's Bum Report
I'm back. Just a report from yesterday. 47 in the Wharf area. See some of our best below. They sure are pretty!
Of course the city now wants to ban smoking outside our restaurants at tables and on the sidewaiks (that'sreally important) and run away more visitors from overseas who still smoke. We also still need to ban HappyMeals to run away families but God forbid we do anything about the Bum's. They are so "underserved".
A big Thank You to Mayor Newsome and all our Stupidvisors.
Fior d' ItaliaAmerica's Oldest Italian Restaurant
Bob and Jinx LariveProprietors2237 Mason StreetSan Francisco CA 94133(415) 986-1886 ~ww.fior.com
file:IIC:\Documents and Settings\pnevin\Local Settings\Temp\notesFFF692\-web4295.htm 10/18/2010
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Fw: Controller's Office Report: Monthly Overtime Report
From:To:
Date:Subject:Sent by:
Controller Reports/CON/SFGOVAngela Calvillo, BOS-Supervisors/BOS/SFGOV, BOS-Legislative Aides/BOS/SFGOV, Steve Kawa,Greg Wagner/MAYORISFGOV@SFGOV, Tony Winnicker/MAYORISFGOV@SFGOV, StarrTerrell/MAYORISFGOV@SFGOV, Severin Campbell/BudgetAnalystlSFGOV@SFGOV, DebraNewman/BudgetAnalystlSFGOV@SFGOV, [email protected], Ben Rosenfield,[email protected], Maura Lane, CON-EVERYONE/CON/SFGOV10/15/201001:01 PMController's Office Report: September Monthly Overtime ReportDebbie Toy
Administrative Code Section 18.13-1, enacted through Ordinance No. 197-08, requires the Controller tosubmit a monthly overtime report to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor's Budget Director listing thefive City departments using the most overtime in the preceding month.
The five City departments using the most overtime for September 2010 were: (1) MunicipalTransportation Agency; (2) Fire; (3) Police; (4) Public Health; and (5) Sheriff. Collectively, these fivedepartments averaged 6.4% overtime versus regular hours and accounted for 89.3% of the total Citywideovertime for the month.
1tlOTsept201 0_201 01 015131531_000.PDF
~.~:::.:;:::,-«;. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO. .._... .-==~=~=~~==----_---.---:~~-::-:":,~. ~ OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben Rosenfield. .• • Controller~U• .,..fl';#:'
Monique ZmudaDeputy Controller
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Members, Board of SupervisorsMayor Gavin Newsom
Ben Rosenfield, Controller
October 15, 2010
port (Administrative Code Section 18.13-1)
Administrative Code Section 18.13-1, enacted through Ordinance No. 197-08, requires the Controllerto submit a monthly overtime report to the Board of Supervisors and the Mayor's Budgct Directorlisting the five City departments using the most overtime in the preceding month.
The five City departments using the most overtime for September 2010 were: (I) MunicipalTransportation Agency; (2) Fire; (3) Police; (4) Public Health; and (5) Sheriff. Col1ectively, thesenve departments averaged 6.4% overtime versus regular hours and accounted for 89.3% of the totalCitywide overtime for the month. This data includes two pay periods ending September 3, 2010 andSeptember 17,2010.
Fiscal Year 2010-11 To-Date
The five City departments using the most overtime cumulatively for the fiscal year are: (J) MunicipalTransportation Agency; (2) Fire; (3) Police; (4) Public Health; and (5) Sheriff. Collectively, thesefive departments averaged 6.5% overtime versus regular hours and accounted for 88.5% of the totalCitywide overtime for the three month period ofJuly 2010 through September 2010.
Please contact me at (415) 554-7500 ifyou have any questions regarding this overtime information.
cc: Greg Wagner, Mayor's Budget DirectorHarvey Rose, Budget AnalystVictor Young, Clerk, Board of Supervisors' Budget and Finance CommitteeSonali Bose, Finance Director, Municipal Transportation AgencyKen Bukowski, Finance Director, Police DepartmentDeborah Landis, Senior Analyst, Police DepartmentMonica Fields, Deputy ChiefofAdministration, Fire DepartmentMark Corso, Budget Manager, Fire DepartmentGregg Sass, Finance Director, Department ofPublic HealthJenny Louie, Budget Manager, Department of Public HealthMaureen Gannon, Budget Manager, Sheriff
415-554·7500 City Han·! Dr. Carlton R Goodlett Place" Room 316" San FranciSCO CA 94102-4694 FAX 415·554-7466
City and County of San FranciscoController's Office
Appendix 1: Monthly Overtime Report
Julv 2010 finciudes 1.7 cav corleds Jul'i 2010 Averaoe per Pa PeriodPercent 01
Percentage TotalRegular Overtime Overtime vs. Citywide Regular Overtime
Decertrnent Hours Hours Regular Hours Overtime OvertIme Pay Depertmenl HOUfS Hours Overtime PavMTA . 577137 66476 11.5% 46.2% 3215654 MTA 339492 39103 1691679Fire 234705 27545 11.7% 20.0% 1929167 Fire 139062 16203 1134616Police 346724 9261 2.7% 10.2% 641164 Police 132 5447 494814Public Heallh 733461 14116 1.9% 6.7% 646 391 Public Haallh 431459 8304 380 212Sheriff 139151 5577 4.0% 4.0% 357849 Sheriff 81663 3281 210499Total 2.033,197 122.974 6.4% 99.2% $8,990.435 Total 1.185,998 72,338 84.112.021
Au01. 2010 nncludes2 cav corlcds) Auoust 2010 Averaoe r Pav PeriodPercent of
Percentage TotalRegUlar Overtime Overtime vs. Citywide Regular Overtime
Department HOUfS Hours Regular Hours Overtime Overtime Pay Department Hours Hours Overtime PayMTA 679339 89228 13.1% 49.3% 4346678 MTA 339669 44614 2174339Fire 270775 36153 13.4% 20.0% 2506239 Fire 135398 18061 1253119Police 420 619 9395 2.2% 5.2% 1500892 Police 210310 4695 750441Public Haalth 654534 19990 2.3% 11.0% 909720 Public Heatth 442317 9995 454850Public Utilllies Commission 322908 5947 1.8% 3.3% 366206 Public Utilities COmmission 161454 2974 184103Total 2.578,275 180.722 6.8% 88.7% $9.833.724 Total 1.289.137 80,381 84,818.882
sa ember2010 2 riods Sa ember 201 0 Avera e r Pa PeriodPercentol
Percentage TotalRegUlar Overtime overtime vs. CItywlde Regular Overtime
Department KoUfS Hours Regulsr Hours Overtime Overtime Pay Department HOUfS Hours Overtime PayMTA 892479 66130 12.3% 50.6% 4497575 MTA 346240 42566 2246788Fire 272538 32.734 12.0% 19.5% 2249815 Fire 136 319 18367 1124906Police 421126 9804 2.3% 10.0% 1078114 Police 210553 4902 539057Public Heslth 876400 16695 1.9% 5.8% 719455 PublloHeallh 439200 8447 359728Sheriff 165 533 5550 3.4% 3.3% 229410 Sheriff 82916 2790 114705Total 2,428.476 150.143 6.4% 89.3% $8.774,389 Total 1.214,238 76.071 84.387.186
CCSF~ ControUer's OfficeN:\BUOOE1\2011\Overtime\1 Overtime Report 201lJ..ll MonIbly\3 8ept2010\
Moolhly Overtimo Report Soptember 2010 _ 0uu1
City and County 01 San Franc:lscoController's OffIce
Appendix 1: Monthly OV8r1lme Report
Fiscal Vear 2010-11 Total To-Dale Fiscal Vear To-Date Avera , oar Pav PeriodCumulative
Cumulative PercentalCumulative Cumutatlve Pen:eotage Total
Regular Overtime Overtime vs. Citywide Cumulative Regular OvertimeDepartment Hours Hours Regular Hours Overtime Overtime Pay Deportment Hours Hours overtime PayMTA 1949206 240 785 12.4% 49.2% 12068526 MTA 341966 42243 2117265Fire m571 96430 12.4% 19.7% 6685240 Fire 136416 16917 1172849Police 1 191 631 26472 2.4% 5.8% 3429116 Police 209068 4995 601599Public Health 2493168 60990 2.0% 10.4% 2275536 Public Health 437398 8_ 399 217Sheriff 471 00 16632 3.5% 3.4% 904 758 Sheriff 82633 2918 158729Total 6,882,684 433,308 6.6% 88.5% $26,363,176 Total 1,207,471 78,019 $4,449,880
CCSF- Cootrollet's Offi~
N:\BUDGE1\2011\0verfime\1 Overlimc Report 2010-11 Monthl}'I3 Sept 2010\Momhlyavom"",Report 2010~Quut
City and County of San FranciscoController's OfIice
Appendix 2: Monthly Overtime Report
-----------------,I ---.. MTA -Fire
I Overtime Hours, July 2009 through Public Heatth Police
I September 2010 _ . -Sheriff
~ MT~" .... " ...,.. ,..' ...._-" '-- ,~, ,- "" \,-_... -, ,---' "" ,'" ',,' \............., ,.--' ".... ~ \...""-_ ......-...,' \
...., ", "','
I ~- J,,(F1r.
f..••...:;.:.;:..; : ~ _. ~./ ."publicr _._._._ _. _. ... . . !';'••~.Ith, ._._ _._ ... Pbllce____ 4 _ _ .___ l&-
• '''''-'-'~herl
50
45
o
~~#~~~#~~.~#~~##~#~###~#~###~#$#~~~ ~'(" ",\ "'~ ~~ ~'\"'..,\ ~\.. <3."'1' ~v ~......\" ~v oS ~..... '" ~" ~" ..;~ ~ ..... ~".. <)." ,,7" ,.'\' ~..... ~~ ~7" ~ "". ~\ ~\"
0,,; 0,,; .... '" ..;.r.."
i 40c~ 35
~ 30c..e 25•:l! 20•.5 15
"~ 10
5
payPeriod End Date
CCSF ~ Controller's OfficeN:IBUOOEl\2OI1IOvertimell Overtime Report201O.11 Montltly\3 Sept 20101
Monthly Overtime Report September 2010 Graph
To: BOS Constituent Mail Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Fwd: for immediate release / Events
From:To:Date:SUbject:
Axis Love <[email protected]>"board.of.supervisors" <[email protected]>10/18/201011:02 PMFwd: [sf-mmj] Fwd: for immediate release / Events
Hello Supervisors, Bellow is anaction alert released by Axis Of Love SF regarding our recent noticeto register as a retial pharmacy for medical cannabis, which we arenot. As many of you know first hand who have been at educationalforums the center has hosted. THe defition doesnt do its job,it doesntdefine what an mdc is and has without intending to, all of the smallcollective that operate medical cannabis charitys at risk, in whatssuppose to be the sancturay city for medical cannabis. The patientadvocates want to tell you about their collective, with the hope ofyour support to protect all our citys cannabis charitys. Thank you inadvance for listening to our truth,shona
---------- Forwarded message ----------From: Richard Muller <richard [email protected]>Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:57:38 -0700 (PDT)Subject: [sf-mmj ] Fwd: for immediate release / EventsTo: San Francisco Medical Marijuana Discussion List<[email protected]>, SFBay Cannabis Community List<[email protected]>
From: Axis Love <[email protected]> ,friends, and helpers
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:
Tuesday, October 19th, City Hall San Francisco - Axis of Love SFmembers speak out in protest of the issuance of a violation against asocial se~vice/non-profit/compassionatesatellite. Axis of Love SF hasbeen reported as an illegal dispensary, even though there is noexchange of funds for medicine.
At a recent medical cannabis task force meeting, the task force votedto pen a letter to the City Attorney on three major loopholes in theMCA Act of 2005. One of the addressed issues concerns the distributionof cannabis .. If cannabis is distributed to more than ten people, therequirement is one shouldregister as a retail pharmacy for medical
cannabis, regardless if there is an exchange of funds or not.
For over three years, Axis of Love SF has been operating amembers-only community center for low income, and no income patients,with support from 1944 Ocean and HopeNet (both permitted collectives) .Axis of Love SF provides social services, community building, advocacyfor patient rights, as well as compassionate, free medicine. TheDirector of Axis of Love SF, Shona Gochenaur, received an award fromthe Board of Supervisors for her work for citizens in District 6. Axisof Love SF has worked tirelessly supporting the permitting process ofmany local dispensaries. Along side the Mayor's Office and SupervisorAlioto-Pier, Axis helped create reasonable ADA requirements for
dispensaries and prevented the closure of ten clubs. With SupervisorCampos, Axis of Love SF helped create a medical cannabis task
forceand with Supervisor Mirkarimi a historical resolution regardingcompassionate care for the City was instituted.
Axis of Love SF helped create the oversight committee for lowestpriority of marijuana offenses with Tom Ammiano and worked withcongressman John Conyers to write a letter to the head of the D.E.A.regarding the prosecution of medicinal marijuana patients.
When not fighting to change laws for the betterment of the entirecannabis community, Axis of Love SF helps members secure betterhouping, hosts a HIV support and women's health group, and pelpsnavigate social services. There is no way that this community centeris a retail pharmacy.
Patient advocates will speak to the Board about their concerns anddemand that the law be changed to be a reasonable reflection of whatis a medical dispensary.
While this attack on a non-profit community center is happening anunregistereddelivery service with online menus and advertisements in
local papers, is delivering pounds of cannabis with exchange of funds,and no regulations in place. There is only one registered deliveryservice, the Green Cross, who filed proper paperwork and abides bylaw. Instead of focusing on a non-profit that does not exchange fundsfor medicine, the City should be turning it's attention tounregistered profiteers.
Please, support Axis of Love SF against an unwarranted and unfounded attack.
EVENTS======================================
Silicon Valley ASA Chapter Meeting
Tuesday October 19th7:30-9:00pm2000 Senter RdSan Jose
======================================
NEXT EAST BAY CHAPTER MEETING:
Tuesday, November 19Oaksterdam Student Union1915 Broadway (1 block from 19th St. BART)Oakland6:30-8:00 pm
=====================================
NEXT SANFRANCISCO CHAPTER MEETING:
Tuesday, October 26thBowzer's Pizza371 11th Street
To: . BOS Constituent Maii Distribution,Cc:Bcc:Subject: Goiden Gate Park - Westside Water Treatment Piant- EiR SC(mirlO Letter
From:To:Date:Subject:
"Golden Gate Park Preservation Alliance" <[email protected]><[email protected]>10/18/201003:15 PMGolden Gate Park - Westside Recycled Water Treatment Plant - EIR Scoping Letter
Dear Supervisor:
Re: Scoping letter for EIR Case No.200S.0091ESF Westside Recycled Water Project(Recycled water project, including factory planned for Golden Gate Park)
The SF Public Utilities Commission is planning to locate a water treatment factory in Golden Gate Park.The proposed building will be over 40,000 square feet and up to 30 feet high; additional land will berequired for the landscaping as well as paving, parking, and night lighting. Much more land will beimpacted by tree removal; future expansion needs could also impact the Park. This project is notappropriate for prime parkland.
The SFPUC is beginning an Environmental Impact Report review process. Attached is the Scoping Letterthat GGPPA has submitted for this project. The letter references the Beach Chalet Athletic Fieldsproject and the cumulative impacts of the two projects, and therefore, the SFOE June 2010 ScopingRequest letter for that project is also attached.
If you have any questions, please contact us. Thank you for your interest.
Katherine HowardMember, Steering CommitteeGGPPA
~SF Westside Recycled Water Project - Scoping ietter and Comments - GGPPAPDF
~Beach Chalet Athletic Fields - RequesUor_a_scoping_session -6-25-10.pdf
AIRPORT COMMISSION:
Concession Audit of HostInternational, Inc.
September 30, 2010
CONTROLLER'S OFFICECITY SERVICES AUDITOR
The City Services Auditor was created within the Controller's Office through an amendment to theCity Charter that was approved by voters in November 2003. Under Appendix F to the City Charter,the City Services Auditor has broad authority for:
• Reporting on the level and effectiveness of San Francisco's pUblic services andbenchmarking the city to other public agencies and jurisdictions.
• Conducting financial and performance audits of city departments, contractors, and functionsto assess efficiency and effectiveness of processes and services.
• Operating a whistleblower hotline and website and investigating reports of waste, fraud, andabuse of city resources.
• Ensuring the financial integrity and improving the overall performance and efficiency of citygovernment.
The audits unit conducts financial audits, attestation engagements, and performance audits. Financialaudits address the financial integrity of both city departments and contractors and provide reasonableassurance about whether financial statements are presented fairly in all material aspects inconformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Attestation engagements examine, review,or perform procedures on a broad range of subjects such as internal controls; compliance withrequirements of specified laws, regUlations, rules, contracts, or grants; and the reliability ofperformance measures. Performance audits focus primarily on assessment of city services andprocesses, providing recommendations to improve department operations.
We conduct our audits in accordance with the Government Auditing Standards published by the U.S.Government Accountability Office (GAO). These standards require:
• Independence of audit staff and the audit organization.• Objectivity of the auditors performing the work.• Competent staff, including continuing professional education.• Quality control procedures to provide reasonable assurance of compliance with the aUditing
standards.
Audit Team: Elisa Sullivan, Audit ManagerVivian Chu, Associate Auditor
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO
OFFICE OF THE CONTROLLER Ben RosenfieldController
Monique ZmudaDeputy Controller
September 30, 2010
San Francisco Airport CommissionP.O. Box 8097San Francisco International AirportSan Francisco, CA 94128
President, Members, and Director Martin:
John L. Martin, DirectorSan Francisco International AirportP.O. Box 8097San Francisco, CA 94128
The Controller's Office, City Services Auditor, presents its report concerning the concessionaudit of Host International, Inc. (Host). Host has a five-year lease agreement, throughDecember 31, 2013, with the Airport Commission of the City and County of San Francisco (City)to operate two newsstands, one newsstand/cafe, and one clothing store at the San FranciscoInternational Airport (SFO).
Reporting Period: January 1,2008, through December 31, 2009
Rent Paid: $2,498,853
Results:
Host correctly reported gross revenues of $10,254,334, and correctly paid its rent. However,Host did not submit timely to the Airport the required annual certified financial statement reportfor 2009.
The responses of the Airport and Host are attached to this report. The Controller's Office, CityServices Auditor, will work with the Airport to follow up on the status of the recommendationsmade in this report.
Respectfully submitted,
Tonia LedijuDirector of Audits
cc: MayorBoard of SupervisorsBudget AnalystCivil Grand JuryPublic Library
415-554-7500 City Hall- 1 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett Place· Room 316· San Francisco CA 94102M 4694 FAX 415-554-7466
Page intentionally left blank.
INTRODUCTION
Audit Authority
Background
Scope and Methodology
The Office of the Controller (Controller) has authority underthe San Francisco Administrative Code, Chapter 10, Article1, Section 10.6-2, to audit, at regular intervals, all leases ofCity-owned real property where rent of $100,000 or more ayear is to be paid to the City. In addition, the City Charterprovides the Controller, City Services Auditor (CSA), withbroad authority to conduct audits. This audit was conductedunder that authority and pursuant to an audit plan agreed toby the Controller and the Airport Department (Airport).
Host International, Inc., (Host) has a five-year leaseagreement, through December 31, 2013, with the AirportCommission of the City and County of San Francisco (City)to operate two newsstands, one newsstand/cafE'l, and oneclothing store at four locations in Terminal 3 at the SanFrancisco International Airport (SFO).
The iease agreement requires Host to pay the Airportmonthly rent the greater of one-twelfth of a minimum annualguarantee (MAG) or a tiered percentage rent of 12 to 16percent of its gross revenues. The percentage rent rate tobe applied each month depends on the cumulative amountof Host's total gross revenues per lease year it has reachedthat month. Although the lease requires a monthly MAGrent of $125,833 starting on Host's rent commencementdate, which was January 1, 2009, for the period fromJanuary 1, 2008, through December 31,2008, Host paidrent of 20 percent of its gross revenue during thisconstruction period, as specified in the lease agreement.
The purpose of this audit was to determine whether:
• The monthly statements of gross revenues that Hostsubmitted to the Airport accurately reflected actualgross revenues based on monthly and daily records.
• Host paid the proper amount of rent to the Airport,according to the terms of its lease.
• Host currently has no overdue rent payable to theAirport for the audit period.
• Host complied with other provisions of its lease.
1
2
The audit covered the period January 1, 2008, throughDecember 31,2009.
To conduct the audit, the audit team:
• Examined the applicable terms of the lease and theadequacy of Host's procedures for collecting,recording, summarizing, and reporting its grossrevenues to the Airport.
• Compared on a sample basis Host's reported grossrevenues to those recorded in its internal monthlysummary records.
• Compared on a sample basis Host's internal monthlysummary records to daily sales reports.
• Examined the Airport's aged accounts receivablereport to determine whether Host had any outstandingpayments due to the Airport.
• Selected key lease requirements and performed testingto determine whether Host complied with otherprovisions of its leases.
This performance audit was conducted in accordance withgenerally accepted government aUditing standards. These
. standards require planning and performing the audit toobtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to provide areasonable basis for the findings and conclusions based onthe audit objectives. We believe that the evidence obtainedprovides a reasonable basis for the findings andconclusions based on the audit objectives.
AUDIT RESULTS
Host Correctly ReportedIts Revenues andCorrectly Paid Its Rent tothe Airport
For the audit period January 1, 2008, through December31, 2009, Host correctly reported gross revenues of$10,254,334, and accordingly calculated and paid rent of$2,498,853 to the Airport. The exhibit below shows Host'sreported gross revenues and rent paid.
EXHIBIT Gross Revenues Reported and Rent PaidJanuary 1, 2008, through December 31,2009
Reporting Period Gross RevenuesReported
Rents Paid
January 1, 2008 - December 31,2008 $ 4,944,267 $ 988,853
January 1, 2009 - December 31, 2009
Total
5,310,067
$10,254,334
1,510,000
$2,498,853Source: Monthly Statements 'Of Sales and Rent Due submitted by Host.
Host Did Not TimelySubmit the RequiredAnnual CertifiedFinancial Report
Recommendation
Host did not timely submit its annual certified financialreport for 2009 to the Airport. According to the leaseagreement, within 90 days after the end of each leaseyear, Host is required to submit to the Airport anunqualified year-end financial report prepared by aCertified Public Accountant (CPA) showing gross revenueachieved with respect to the prior lease year. According toHost's staff accountant, there was confusion over the startof the lease year. Host thought that the lease year startedon the date its newsstand/cafe opened, which was July 23,2009, when in fact the lease year commenced on January1, 2009. Therefore, Host did not submit a CPA report for2009.'
1. The Airport should ensure that Host submits its annualcertified financial report within 90 days after the end ofeach lease year.
, Host provided the audit team and the Airport with its 2009 CPA report on September 2,2010, after auditfieldwork had concluded.
3
4
Page intentionally left blank.
APPENDIX A: AIRPORT'S RESPONSE
San Francisco International Airport
September 15.2010
YIAEMAIL
Ms. Tonin Lediju, Direclorof AuditsCity Hall, Room 477I Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco. CA 94102
I,~I ,,~(lIl)l ;1)(1(\
b, (l,'),~"! ~(,I),
Reference: lias! International Inc,'s Terminal 3 Newsstands and Spedalty Store Lease No.07..(}lOO between the CilY nnd County of Sail FranciSico, through it~ AirportCommission. and Hoslllltcmational, Inc.
,'·1, /l~(' :l1\IN'V
'.'f''''''MI<r"cu
\A""¥ "h~7."1 /l
'~f"nt~'r
""I'''~.~~/l'''m
w·, "'"~'''''''
The San Francisco International Airport {"Airport") is in receipt of the Audit Recommendationfrom City Services Auditor Division for its audit of Host International. Inc.·s ("Host") Leas~No, 07-0100 between the City and County of San Francisco. through its Airport Commission.and Hos! International. Inc. The following is the Airport's response to the Audit Reportfindings:
1. TI,e Airport should ensure Host submits its annual certified financial rt:portwithin 90 days after the end of each lease year. The Airport concurs,
Thank you for your staffs work on lhis audit. Please do not hesitat~ to call if you have :lnyquc,Stions.
Sincerely,
~Cheryl NashirAssociate D~puty Airport DirectorRewnue Development and Management
,cc: Wallace TangTomasi TokiVivian Chu
A-1
AUDIT RECOMMENDATION AND RESPONSE
Recommendation
1. The Airport should ensure that Hostsubmits its annual certified financialreport within 90 days after the end ofeach lease year.
A-2
Responsible I ResponseAgency
Airport I The Airport concurs.
APPENDIX B: HOST'S RESPONSE
September 22, 2010
Tonia LedijuDirector of AuditsCity Hall, Room 4771 Dr. Carlton B. Goodlett PlaceSan Francisco, CA 94102
Dear Ms. Lediju,
Enclosed please find HMSHost's response to the audit findings report resulting from the examination of theTenninal3.Newsstands an<,t Specialty Store Lease agreement at San Francisco International Airport, for theperiod ofJanuary 2008 through December 2009,
Please do not hesitate to contact me at (240) 694-4265 or Monica Keller at (240) 694-4726 if you have anyquestions.
Sincerely,
13ff~~-Eswaran JeyarajahManagerInternal Audit, Contractual Compliance
6905 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE BETHESOA, MD 20817 240.694.4100
B-1
Responses to san Francisco IntemotJonal AJmort Authority Audit FindingsFor the pariod January 2008 through December 2009
Audjt Finding:
Host did not timely submit its annual certified financial report for 2009 to the Airport. According to the leaseagreement, within 90 days after the end of each lease year, Host is required to submit to the Airport an unqualifiedyear-end financial report prepared by a Certified Public Accountant (CPA) showing gross revenue achIeved withraspect to the prior lease year. According to Hosfs staff accountant, there was confusion over the start of lhe leaseyear. Host thought that the lease year started on the date its newsstant;flcaM opened, which was July 23, 2009, whenin fact the lease year commenced on January 1, 2009. Therefore, Host did not submit a CPA report fOr 2009. 1
Recommendation;
The Airport should ensure that Host submits its annual certified financial report within 90 days after the end of eachlease year.
Management Response;
The Airport concurs.
HMSHost Response;
HMSHost concurs with thefindiTlg. The delay In submitting the CPA--certified annual report for 2009 was due to amislnterpretatton of the lease year for this contract. It was initially thought that the lease and ah reporting terms wouldbecome effective as of July 23, 2009, whIch Was lhe start date of lhe Arrivals Level Starbucks and News Exprassfacility. This initial interpretation fed HMSHost to befleve that the lease year would be July 1 through June 30, with anannual report due within 90 days ofthe lease year Bfld, or September 30.
During the course of your audit, documentation was obtained which clarified that the Ren! Commencement Date wasJanuary 1, 2009, with a lease year and reporting period of January' through December 31. In an effort to remedy theoversight. HMSHost dUly coOrdinated with our Independent auditors, KPMG LLP, to expedite the preparation of the2009 annual report Although HMSHost was only obUgatect 10 submit the annual report fo(2009, we submItted thefollowing on September 2,2010;
CFO-certified statement for the Construction Pefiod of October 29, 2007 through December 31, 2008; and• CPA<:ertified annual report fortlle Lease Year Ending December 31, 2009
Going fOlWard. HMSHost wlll ensure that all CPA~certifjed annual reports are sUbmitted within 90 days of the end ofeach lease year, as contractually required.
TJi'OSt provided the audit team and the Airport wlth ils 2009 CPA report on September 2,2010, after audit fieldwork:had conclUded.
B-2
6905 ROCKLEDGE DRIVE BETHESDA, MD 20817 240.694.4100
{1)~?~j~Coalition for San Francisco
www.csfn.net • PO Box 320098 • San Francisco CA 94132-0098 • 415.262.0440 • Estl972
PresidentJudith Berkowitz 415.824,0617
1st Vice PresidentPenelope Clark 776.3876
2nd Vice PresidentAngelique Mahan 334.7131
Recording SecretaryDemian Quesne/861.5084Corresponding Secretary
Dick Millet 861.0345Treasurer
Jim Lew 771.5250Members-at~Large
Sue CauthenRae Doyfe
Lorraine Lucas
Barbary Coast NeighborhoodAssnBuena Vista NeighbOrhood Assn
Cathedral Hilf Neighbors AssnCayuga Improvement Assn
Cofe Valley Improvement AssnCow Hollow Assn
Dolores Heights improvement ClubEaSf Mission Improvement Assn
Castro-Eureka Vafley NeighborhoodAssnEwing TetnlC$ Neighborhood Assn
Excelsior District Improvement AssnFair Oaks Community Coalition
Forest KnoUs NeighborhoodAssnFrancisco Heights Civic Assn
Golden Gate Heights Neighborhood AssnGreater West Porta' Neigllborhood Assn
Haight Ashbury ImprovementAssnInner Sunset Action CommitteeJordan Park Improvement Assn
Laurel Heights Improvement AssnUncofn Park Homeowners Assn
Marina Civic Improvement &Property OwnefS Assn
Middle Polk Neighborhood AssnMid/own Terrace HomeownefS Assn
Mira/orne. Park Improvement ClubMission Creek Harbor Assn
New Mission Terrace mprovement AssnNorth Beach Neighbors
OCeanvlew, Merced Heights,Ing/eside - Neighbors in Action
Outer Mission Residents AssnPacific Heighls Residents Assn
Panhandle Residents Organization!Slanyan-Fuflon
Parkmerced Residents 0'9Potrero Boosters Neighborhood Assn
Richmond Commum'tyAssnRincon Point Neighborhood Assn
Russian HI1I rmprovsment AssnRussian Hifl Neighbors
Sunset Heights Assn ofResponsible People
Sunset-Pari<sfde Education &Action Committee
Telegraph Hifl DwellersTwin Peaks Council & Open
Space ConseTvancyTwin Peaks Improvement Assn
University Terrace NeighborhoodAssn
September 23, 2010
To: SF PUC Commission President Francis X. Crowley, Vice-President Francesca Vietor,Commissioners Ann Moller Caen, Juliet Ellis, Anson Moran; General Manager EdHarrington; Commission Secretary, Michael Housh;
To: SF Rec & Park Commission President Mark Buell, Vice-President Tom Harrison,Commissioners Gloria Bonilla, Larry Martin, David E. Lee, Meagan Levitan, Michael J.Sullivan; General Manager SF Rec & Park Dept. Philip Ginsburg, Commission LiaisonMargaret A. McArthur
Re: Resolution regarding the proposed construction of the Westside Water Treatment Plantin Golden Gate Park
Sir, Madam,
The General Assembly of the Coalition for San Francisco Neighborhoods voted unanimously onSeptember 21, 2010 to adopt the attached resolution. The Westside Water Treatment Plantintroduces a new building and infrastructure to the western end of Golden Gate Park, an area thatits Master Plan requires should be preserved as parkland and for recreational uses.
CSFN asks that complete information about the project and alternatives be included in theupcoming BIR.
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the Environmental ImpactReport for the Westside Water Treatment Plant include an indepth exploration of alternative locations outside of GoldenGate Park for the water treatment plant. Be it further
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the EIR contain an in-depthexploration of alternative designs for the plant building,including but not limited to a completely below-grade plan, asdescribed in the Golden Gate Park Master Plan, if it is locatedin Golden Gate Park. And be it finally
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the EIR explore, including butnot limited to, the rationale for new pipe installation, theviability of the existing pipes, the rationale for tertiary mixingand alternative processes to it, the need for reverse osmosis, andthe rationale and need (or a Visitors' Center.
We urge you to recognize these deeply felt concerns of our members who wish to protect GoldenGate Park
The full text of the resolution is attached, giving more information on our concerns.
Sincerely,
Judith BerkowitzPresident
RESOLUTION to request exploration of alternative locations outside of GoldenGate Park and alternative designs for the Westside Water Treatment Plant
Whereas: The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission is planning to build a water treatmentplant in Golden Gate Park, on land managed by the San Francisco Recreation and ParkDepartment; and,
Whereas: This water treatment plant will consist of approximately 40,000 square feet ofbuildings, some up to 30 feet high, as well as paving, parking and night lighting; and,
Whereas: According to the 1998 Golden Gate Park Master Plan this space should be used forrecreation and parkland; and,
Whereas: According to the Master Plan if a water treatment plant were installed, it must beplaced completely underground with recreational uses on top; therefore be it
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the Environmental Impact Report for the WestsideWater Treatment Plant include an in.depth exploration of alternative locationsoutside of Golden Gate Park for the water treatment plant. Be it further
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the EIR contain an in·depth exploration ofalternative designs for the plant building, including but not limited to a completelybelow.grade plan, as described in the Golden Gate Park Master Plan, if it is located inGolden Gate Park. And be it finally
Resolved, that CSFN recommends that the EIR explore, including but not limited to, therationale for new pipe installation, the viability of the existing pipes, the rationale fortertiary mixing and alternative processes to it, the need for reverse osmosis, and therationale and need for a Visitors' Center.
cc: Mayor Gavin Newson; Board of Supervisors: District I Eric Mar; District 2 Michela AliotoPier; District 3 David Chiu; District 4 Carmen Chu; District 5 Ross Mirkarimi; District 6,Chris Daly; District 7 Sean Elsbernd; District 8 Bevan Dufty; District 9 David Campos;Disll"ict 10 Sophie Maxwell; District II John Avalos, Clerk of the Board Angela Calvillo
cc: SF Planning Commission President Ron Miguel, Vice President Christina Olague,Commissioners Michael Antonini, Gwyneth Borden, Kathrin Moore, Hisashi Sugaya,Director of Planning, John Rahaim; Commission Secretary Linda Avery; EnvironmentalReview Officer, Bill Wycko
2