cabling requirements for 10 gb/s ethernet · 2008-08-27 · csc presentation – june 2006 ......
TRANSCRIPT
CSC Presentation – June 2006 © 2006 Fluke Networks 1
Cabling Requirements for Cabling Requirements for 1010 GbGb/s Ethernet/s Ethernet
Overview & Status of Standards WorkFluke Network Test Solutions
© 2006 Fluke Networks 2CSC Presentation – June 2006
IntroductionOverview and status of 10GBASE-T development10 Gb/s Ethernet over twisted pair cablingFocus
The development of the performance specification of the cabling requirementsThe impact on field testing
An overview of measurement techniquesFluke Networks is an active contributor in the research, testing and modeling of cabling requirements for 10GBASE-T
RecommendationsWhat can or should you do today?
© 2006 Fluke Networks 3CSC Presentation – June 2006
10GBASE-T Applications
Application10GBASE Fiber
(802.3ae)10GBASE-T 10GBASE-CX4
(802.3ak)
Data CenterServer Clustering Yes Yes Yes (< 15m)
HorizontalIn Building No Yes No
VerticalRiser Backbone Yes No No
Campus Yes No No
© 2006 Fluke Networks 4CSC Presentation – June 2006
Twisted-Pair Cabling Expected to Support 10GBASE-T
Currently Installed Cabling
Channel Length (m)
Comments
ISO Class F 100 Supported (IEEE objective)
ISO Class E/TIA Cat 6 UTP
55 Supported (IEEE objective)
ISO Class E ScTP 100 Expected to meet requirements
ISO Class E / TIA Cat 6 with PS AXTalk testing
55 to 100 Requires additional (field) test of PS AXTalk parameters
Future CablingTIA Cat 6 AugmentedISO Class E Augmented
100 To be defined; supports 10GBASE-T alien crosstalk requirements over the full 100 m. Contains also improvements of internal parameters (not needed for 10GBASE-T).
© 2006 Fluke Networks 5CSC Presentation – June 2006
Relevant Cabling documents
To support 10GBASE-T over Cat 6/Class E cablingTIA: TSB-155 (Technical Service Bulletin)ISO/IEC: TR24750 (Technical report
To support 10GBASE-T alien crosstalk requirements over the full 100 m
TIA: Addendum #10 to TIA/EIA-568-B.2ISO/IEC: 2nd Amendment of ISO/IEC 11801.
Note: the 55 m for TIA Cat 6 or ISO Class E is being questioned.Some believe that it anything longer than 37 m may be subject to
alien crosstalk failures! See draft 5.0 of TIA TSB-155.
© 2006 Fluke Networks 6CSC Presentation – June 2006
TIA/EIA-TSB155 – Draft 5.0Additional Cabling Guidelines for 4-pair 100 Ω Category 6 Cabling for 10GBASE-T applicationsExtended frequency transmission performance of Cat 6 cabling from 250 MHz to 500 MHz
Channel and Permanent Link guidelines and test limitsAlien Crosstalk coupling between 4-pair Cat 6 cabling channels in close proximity of each other.
Measured by PS ANEXT and PS AACR-FAdditional guidelines for field test equipment and field test methods
Accuracy Level IIIe for field certificationAlien Crosstalk testing
This document is in the final revision stage with final committee ballot – Will be published October 2006
© 2006 Fluke Networks 7CSC Presentation – June 2006
TIA/EIA-568-B.2-10 – Draft 4.0
Transmission Performance Specifications for 4-pair 100 ΩAugmented Category 6 CablingPerformance Specifications for all test parameters
Worst pair-to-pair and multi-disturber (power sum) requirements for cable NEXT Loss and ELFEXT
Alien NEXT (PS ANEXT) and Alien FEXT (PS AACR-F)Performance requirements for Cat 6A components
Design specification for Balance of cable and connecting hardwareConnecting hardware specifications
Critical topic to provide interoperability of Cat 6A Will require significant amount of work past the publication of IEEE 802.3an and TIA TSB155
Patch cord requirements: NEXT and Return Loss
© 2006 Fluke Networks 8CSC Presentation – June 2006
Transmission Performance AnalysisMeasure Signal strength (or signal loss) over the specified frequency range
Insertion Loss measurement (used to be called Attenuation)
Must meet specified performance level (less than maximum loss allowed)
Identify and measure noise parameters of interest over the specified frequency range
Standards define the number of test frequencies (step size)
For example: Cat 6 measurement contains 68,712 points/link
Each noise (test) parameter must meet the specified performance level over the total frequency range
© 2006 Fluke Networks 9CSC Presentation – June 2006
Combined affects of all 3 disturbing pairs = Power Sum
Combined 7 Noise Sources - Disturbances
Combined NEXT disturbance from 3 wire-pairs: PSNEXTReturn Loss on same wire-pairCombined FEXT disturbance from 3 wire-pairs: PSELFEXT
© 2006 Fluke Networks 10CSC Presentation – June 2006
Overview of Test Parameters
Measured Test Parameter
Calculated Test Parameter
Propagation Delay Delay Skew, Length Insertion Loss NEXT (pair-to-pair) PSNEXT, ACR, PSACR FEXT (pair-to-pair) ELFEXT, PSELFEXT Return Loss
All of these “familiar” test parameters will be specified for 10GBASE-T cable certification over the frequency range 1 through 500 MHz
CSC Presentation – June 2006 © 2006 Fluke Networks 11
10 10 Gb/sGb/s Ethernet Introduces Ethernet Introduces AnotherAnother
““ComplicationComplication””Discussion of Alien Crosstalk
© 2006 Fluke Networks 12CSC Presentation – June 2006
Cabling Requirements for 10GBASE-T
The signal-to-noise budget analysis is complex and consists of two types of disturbances:‘In-channel’ disturbances – Initially set to ISO/IEC 11801 Class E limits extended to 500 MHz(Class E/Cat 6 defined from 1 to 250 MHz)‘Between-Channel’ disturbances for Crosstalk referred to as “Alien Crosstalk”
Alien Crosstalk has been identified as a “challenge” for UTP cabling systems
Proposed TIA cabling guideline and standard:TIA-TSB-155Standard for “Augmented Cat 6” (Cat 6A) TIA-568-B.2-10
© 2006 Fluke Networks 13CSC Presentation – June 2006
Alien CrosstalkCrosstalk between wire-pairs in adjacent cables General rules:
The effect is due in first instanceby proximityThis crosstalk is worst betweenwire-pairs with the sametwist rateThe effect is greater for pairswith a lower twist rateImpact increases with the distanceover which the cables run in parallelImpact increases with the frequency of the transmitted signals
© 2006 Fluke Networks 14CSC Presentation – June 2006
Transmit
Receive
WorkstationWorkstation
Transmit
Receive
LANLANEquipmentEquipmentSignal
External Noise from adjacent cables
Attenuated Signal
NEXT
Signal strength: measured by “Insertion Loss”Alien Crosstalk: An external source to NEXT, FEXT and RL
Alien Crosstalk Is An External Noise Source
© 2006 Fluke Networks 15CSC Presentation – June 2006
ANEXT and AFEXT Along the Length of the Links
ANEXT is generated in the first 20 m (65 ft)
AFEXT is cumulative through the link and travels its length
Telecom Room Work Area
Channel configuration as defined
PCCP TOC2C1
Switch
ANEXT AFEXT
PCSwitch
© 2006 Fluke Networks 16CSC Presentation – June 2006
Six-around-One Worst Case Alien Crosstalk (varies with link topologies though: distances between connectors and number of connectors).
TIA-TSB-155 defines the six-around-one test configuration as a laboratory test configuration. It is not intended to prove that installed cabling meets alien crosstalk requirements.The center cable is the disturbed or “victim”cabling linkThis creates a worst case Alien XTALK result, which still depends on detailed topology:
The cables stay in same relation the length of the test bundleThis is not likely to occur in real cabling pathways
PS ANEXT for all pairs in the victim link requires 96 pair-to-pair measurements
© 2006 Fluke Networks 17CSC Presentation – June 2006
ANEXT and AFEXT For Varying Link Lengths
Telecom Room Work Area
Permanent link (90m)
CP TOC2
ANEXTAFEXT
AFEXT influence can be over-powering and cripple transmission on the longer link (victim link)10GBASE-T must back-off signal strength on the shorter link or a “normalization” as specified in all documents must be applied.
Victim Link
© 2006 Fluke Networks 18CSC Presentation – June 2006
Fluke Networks Measurement Methods for 10GBASE-T Alien Crosstalk
The “tools” I will describe are not yet available for sale today (schedule early September 2006)These tools have been available as research tools:
Provide the means to perform experiments and gather data in the lab and in field installationsObtain data about real-world cabling systems
Support for standards developmentAssist in developing test procedures and test limits for field certification to 10GBASE-T
© 2006 Fluke Networks 19CSC Presentation – June 2006
ANEXT Measurement
Channel under testMain
Remote
Synchronization connection
Termination Plugs100 Ω Diff and 50 Ω Common mode
Requires a synchronization communication module in the Main and Remote test units.
© 2006 Fluke Networks 20CSC Presentation – June 2006
Termination Plugs
Provide proper termination for high-frequency applications100 Ω differential mode termination, combined with50 Ω common mode termination
50 Ω ± 0.1% Resistor25 Ω ± 1% Resistor
Test
Too
l
© 2006 Fluke Networks 21CSC Presentation – June 2006
ANEXT Measurements Between Two LinksThe brown pair is “disturbed”by the four wire-pairs in the disturber cableThe measurement of the Power Sum ANEXT for this disturbed pair requires four pair-to-pair NEXT measurementsThe PS ANEXT for all wire-pairs requires 16 pair-to-pair measurements
DisturbersVictim Link
Measure all wire-pair combinations between two adjacent cables in approximately 25 seconds
© 2006 Fluke Networks 22CSC Presentation – June 2006
AFEXT Measurement
Link under testMain
Remote
Synchronization connection Synchronization channel
© 2006 Fluke Networks 23CSC Presentation – June 2006
Evaluation of ExperimentsThe experimental methods we described have been successfully used to perform Alien Crosstalk measurements and evaluationsThe tester interfaces with a PC for data acquisition and computational tasksThe test tools need a very high measurement floor
ANEXT noise floor greater than 95 dB over the frequency range (1 through 500 MHz)Very good correlation to lab equipment (Network Analyzer) – but much fasterAll wire-pair combinations between 2 links are tested in 25 seconds
CSC Presentation – June 2006 © 2006 Fluke Networks 24
Alien Crosstalk Measurement StrategyAlien Crosstalk Measurement Strategy
The approach (procedure) to certify a cabling installation for 10 GbE
© 2006 Fluke Networks 25CSC Presentation – June 2006
Measurement Strategy
Measure the in-channel parameters for every linkFrequency range 1 through 500 MHzUpload the results to LinkWare
Setup the laptop with the LinkWare test results data and the Alien Crosstalk Measurement Application (software)
Insertion Loss test results must be available for PS ANEXT and PS AACR-F evaluations
PS ANEXT and PS AACR-F must be based on a “sampling method”
Experiments have shown that PSAXTALK between bundles is negligible
© 2006 Fluke Networks 26CSC Presentation – June 2006
Practical PSAXTalk Strategy (1)
Depends on whether one tests for 10GBASE-T (TIA TSB-155 or ISO TR24750) or an Augmented Cabling standard.10GBASE-T based standards have limits that depend on the insertion loss of the victim link. For shorter links, the requirements are far easier to pass. The guidelines are pretty much agreed upon.Augmented Cat 6/Class E requirements are intended to be application independent, and have limits that are likely not length dependent, but may have escape clauses, which have not yet been agreed upon. (In any case, the processing of measured data includes the insertion losses of victim and disturber links “normalization”.) Issues may arise that do not affect the signal-to-noise ratios, but could affect pass or fail.
© 2006 Fluke Networks 27CSC Presentation – June 2006
Practical PSAXTalk Strategy (2)When you are testing for 10GBASE-T specifications, you select the longest links as victim links, since the limits are far more demanding than for shorter links.When you test per 10GBASE-T, you have to test the channel configuration.When you test per TIA TSB-155, you can test the permanent link or the channel configuration. The limits are identical.
Note: if you test the channel configuration, all user patch cords must be in place, and not be
changed!
© 2006 Fluke Networks 28CSC Presentation – June 2006
Practical PSAXTalk Strategy (3)When you are testing for Augmented Cat 6 or Class E specifications, you select the longest links and some links with the shortest distances between connectors. These configurations tend to provide the worst results.You will have options to select the channel or permanent link configuration.The pass/fail limits are NOT stable yet!
Note: if you test the channel configurations, all user patch cords must be in place, and not be
changed!
© 2006 Fluke Networks 29CSC Presentation – June 2006
Other PSAXTalk Strategy considerationsOnly consider ANEXT and AFEXT between links that run in the same bundleVictim Links: select per the previous slides.PS ANEXT
Test the alien crosstalk “contribution” of all links in a bundle by using all links in the bundle as disturber links
Standards recommend that a minimum of 10 links in an installation are tested as disturbed (victim) linksLimited number of bundles (data center)
Select 10% of the links in a bundle as disturbed (victim) links
© 2006 Fluke Networks 30CSC Presentation – June 2006
The Number of Tests for PS ANEXTA “complete” test is not practical
ANEXT between two cabling links consists of 16 pair-to-pair combinations plus Power Sum calculation
In a bundle of 24 Links:the PS ANEXT calculation for the pairs in one “victim”link
Requires ANEXT measurements of 368 combinationsTime estimate: ~17¼ minutes
The PS ANEXT measurement combinations when every link must be considered a victim link
Requires ANEXT link-to-link measurements of 276 link combinations 4,416 pair-to-pair combinationsTime estimate: 207 minutes or 3 hours and 45 minutes
© 2006 Fluke Networks 31CSC Presentation – June 2006
Recommendations for Design of New(Data Center) Cabling Systems
CautionThe 10GBASE-T definition is complete and finalThe specifications for Augmented Cat 6 (Cat 6A) are not yet complete and may change
Cabling DecisionsMany Cat 6A cables have a larger OD to put distance between wire pairs in adjacent cables
Impact on pathways: fill rate and sizeImpact on wire management: larger bend radius
For ‘Channels’ up to 55? m, Cat 6 UTP offers high probability to meet the Alien XTALK specifications
Alternatives: select ScTP cable types
© 2006 Fluke Networks 32CSC Presentation – June 2006
Recommendations (Cont’d)Connecting hardware decisions
Select Cat 6a componentsConnecting hardware has a significant impact on the frequency specifications of the installed linkPatch panels are likely a source of AXTALK
Keep bundles small (around 12 links)Alien XTALK of wire-pairs in different bundles is most often negligibleANEXT occurs in the first 20 meters of the bundle: affected by patch cords and cable management in the TR Smaller bundles mean fewer links need to be tested for Alien XTALK interactionSpace the bundle ties to 2 or 3 feet; do not over tighten
less rigid bundles create less AXTALK
© 2006 Fluke Networks 33CSC Presentation – June 2006
Recommendations (Cont’d)
Select a quality installation contractorHigh quality workmanship will preserve Cat 6 or Cat 6A component specifications
Incorporate the bundle or pathway name in the Cable IDIf you need to test cabling links for AXTALK performance, you only need to test among links in the same bundle
Last, but not least …Certify the cabling to one of the new standards (or latest draft)
TIA TSB-155 or TIA-568-B.2-10This is the only way to know that the completed installation meets the requirements and offers some safety margin
CSC Presentation – June 2006 © 2006 Fluke Networks 34
Fluke Networks Online Reference Material
www.flukenetworks.com
Fluke Networks’ web site. The resource center contains white papers and the knowledge base contains articles of interest.
www.flukenetworks.com/consultants
Statement of Work – proposed text for Field test requirements
© 2006 Fluke Networks 35CSC Presentation – June 2006
Time for questionsContact Information:
CSC Presentation – June 2006 © 2006 Fluke Networks 36
10Gb/s Fiber optic testing 10Gb/s Fiber optic testing challengeschallenges
© 2006 Fluke Networks 37CSC Presentation – June 2006
Data Rates of Fiber Technologies
10004 10 16 100 10 52 266 100
10000
02000400060008000
1000012000
Toke
nRi
ng 4
Mb
10B
ASE-
FOIL
Toke
nRi
ng 1
6FD
DI/T
PPM
D10
BAS
E-FL A
TM
Fibr
eC
hann
el10
0BA
SE-
FX 1000
BAS
E-S
X10
GB
ASE-
S
1986 1987 1989 1992 1993 1993 1994 1995 1998 2002
Mbp
s
1000BASE-SX and 10GBASE-S using 50/125 μm cabling
© 2006 Fluke Networks 38CSC Presentation – June 2006
Max Distance for MM Technologies
0500
100015002000250030003500
Toke
nRi
ng 4
Mb
10BA
SE-
FOIL
Toke
nRi
ng 1
6
FDDI
/TP
PMD
10BA
SE-
FL ATM
Fibr
eCh
anne
l
100B
ASE-
FX 1000
BASE
-SX
10G
BASE
-S
1986 1987 1989 1992 1993 1993 1994 1995 1998 2002
Met
ers
1000BASE-SX and 10GBASE-S using 50/125 μm cabling
© 2006 Fluke Networks 39CSC Presentation – June 2006
MM Fiber Cabling Loss Limits
13 12.5 13
1112.5
10
6
11
3.562.60
2468
101214
Toke
nRi
ng 4
Mb
10BA
SE-
FOIL
Toke
nRi
ng 1
6M
bFD
DI/T
PPM
D
10BA
SE-
FL ATM
Fibr
eC
hann
el
100B
ASE-
FX 1000
BASE
-SX
10G
BASE
-S
1986 1987 1989 1992 1993 1993 1994 1995 1998 2002
dB
1000BASE-SX and 10GBASE-S using 50/125 μm cabling
© 2006 Fluke Networks 40CSC Presentation – June 2006
10GBASE-S (850 nm laser) MBW Loss Distance62.5 micron multimode fiber: 160 2.60 dB 26 m62.5 micron multimode fiber: 200 2.50 dB 33 m50 micron multimode fiber: 400 2.20 dB 66 m50 micron multimode fiber: 500 2.30 dB 82 m50 micron multimode fiber: 2000 2.60 dB 300 m
10GBASE-LX4 (1310 nm laser)62.5 micron multimode fiber: 500 2.50 dB 300 m50 micron multimode fiber: 400 2.00 dB 240 m50 micron multimode fiber: 500 2.00 dB 300 m50 micron multimode fiber: 2000 2.00 dB 300 msinglemode fiber: 6.30 dB 10 km
Current 10 Gigabit Ethernet Limits
© 2006 Fluke Networks 41CSC Presentation – June 2006
TSB-140
TIA/TSB-140:
Additional Guidelines For Field-Testing Length, Loss And Polarity Of Optical Fiber Cabling Systems
Approved by TR-42 in February 2004
© 2006 Fluke Networks 42CSC Presentation – June 2006
Two-Tier Testing
Tier 1: OLTS (Optical Loss Test Set)− Conforms to TIA-526-14A and TIA-526-7
(Most closely simulates system)
− Measures the total loss of a fiber channel− Verify polarity using OLTS or VFL
Tier 2: OTDR Trace− Can show segment lengths, connector locations &
losses, and losses not at a connector− Provides evidence that cable is installed without
degrading events (e.g., bends, connection, splice)− Can do single-ended testing
© 2006 Fluke Networks 43CSC Presentation – June 2006
Test Example: Tier 1 (OLTS)
Horizontal Cables
Backbone Cables
TR
MC
62.5/125 μm cabling100 m from the wall outlet7 m patch cord110 m in the backbone
2.15 dB
X
XX X
Source Meter
850 nm1300 nm
© 2006 Fluke Networks 44CSC Presentation – June 2006
Test Example: Tier 2
MCX
XX X
100 m 7 m 110 m
© 2006 Fluke Networks 45CSC Presentation – June 2006
Event Table from OTDR
Location(m)
850nm(dB)
Event Pass/Fail
0 .18 Reflect Pass
100 .14 Reflect Pass
107 .88 Reflect Fail
217 .19 Reflect Pass
1.39 + 0.76 (for cable) = 2.15 dB
100 m 7 m 110 m
© 2006 Fluke Networks 46CSC Presentation – June 2006
Recommendations for Design of Fiber Systems to support 10 Gig
For new fiber optic installations select laser enhanced 50 micron fiber (MBW=2000) and/or singlemodeFor existing installations verify modal bandwidth and length to determine suitability for 10 GigRefer to TSB-140 for field testing of fiber optic systems
Tier 1: mandatory power meter / light source test w/ length and polarity verificationTier 2: OTDR trace to verify quality of installation
Use inspection device to verify no contamination of connectors (dirt is public enemy #1!)