calibrating stellar models in the tess era tayar.pdfjamie tayar with zach claytor and the...

32
Calibrating Stellar Models in the TESS Era Jamie Tayar With Zach Claytor and the APOGEE-Kepler, APOGEE-TESS, & TESS Subgiant Collaborations TESS Science Conference July 30, 2019 Hubble Fellow @StellarTayar

Upload: others

Post on 28-Jan-2021

17 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Calibrating Stellar Models in the TESS Era

    Jamie TayarWith Zach Claytor and the

    APOGEE-Kepler, APOGEE-TESS, & TESS Subgiant Collaborations

    TESS Science ConferenceJuly 30, 2019

    Hubble Fellow@StellarTayar

  • Stellar Model

  • Model Physics Uncertain● Convection● Rotation● Mixing● Diffusion● Atmosphere Boundary Condition● Helium● Solar composition● ...

  • Stellar Model Grid

  • Stellar Model Grid

  • Estimate Stellar Properties

    TOI-1411.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.30 ± 0.09 Mo

    TOI-141Espinoza+(2019)

    TOI-197Huber+ (2019)

  • Impact of Model Choice: YREC

    TOI-1411.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.30 ± 0.09 Mo

    Grid:YREC

  • Impact of Model Choice: MIST

    TOI-1411.05 ± 0.03 Mo1.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.31 ± 0.06 Mo1.30 ± 0.09 MoGrid:

    YRECMIST

    MIST: Choi+(2016)

  • Impact of Model Choice: Dartmouth

    TOI-1411.07 ± 0.02 Mo1.05 ± 0.03 Mo1.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.33 ± 0.07 Mo1.31 ± 0.06 Mo1.30 ± 0.09 Mo

    Grid:YRECMISTDartmouth

    Dartmouth: Dotter+(2008)

  • Model Choice Matters

    TOI-1411.07 ± 0.02 Mo1.05 ± 0.03 Mo1.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.33 ± 0.07 Mo1.31 ± 0.06 Mo1.30 ± 0.09 Mo

    Grid:YRECMISTDartmouth

    Offsets of ~4% in inferred mass depending on model grid used

  • Model Choice Matters

    TOI-1411.07 ± 0.02 Mo1.05 ± 0.03 Mo1.04 ± 0.03 Mo

    TOI-1971.33 ± 0.07 Mo1.31 ± 0.06 Mo1.30 ± 0.09 Mo

    Grid:YRECMISTDartmouth

    Offsets of ~4% in inferred mass depending on model grid used No strong metallicity

    dependence

  • Take Away

    When estimating stellar properties from models,

    either inflate the error bars to account for model

    systematics or compare to multiple models.

  • Stellar Model Grid

  • Sample light curve from Huber+ (2019)

    Di Mauro+ (2011)

    Asteroseismic Masses

  • Stellar Models

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Serenelli+(2017) (inc Tayar)

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Serenelli+(2017) (inc Tayar)

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Models from Claytor+(2019)

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Giants

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    GiantsGiantsOffset- Tayar+ 2017

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Models do well for subgiants

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Transition Unclear- Need More data

  • TESS

  • APOGEE-Kepler Subgiants

    Transition Unclear- Need More data

  • TESS Subgiants

  • Summary

    ● Stellar models need calibration● Model choice impacts inferred mass by ~4%● Predicted HR diagram position ~ correct● Kepler stars are a good but insufficient sample

    for testing models of subgiants● TESS will allow us to add up to 300 more

    similarly well characterized subgiants

  • Expected Rotation

  • Expected Rotation

  • Rotation Difference

  • Rotation Difference

    Giants too slow to measure

  • Rotation Difference

    Scatter for hot stars

  • Rotation Difference

    Subgiants spin faster than expected ?

    Slide 1Slide 2Slide 3Slide 5Slide 6Slide 7Slide 8Slide 10Slide 12Slide 13Slide 14Slide 15Slide 16Slide 25Slide 26Slide 27Slide 28Slide 29Slide 30Slide 31Slide 32Slide 33Slide 34Slide 35Slide 36Slide 38Slide 39Slide 40Slide 41Slide 42Slide 43Slide 44